Military Review

In the United States published satellite images with the results of rocket attacks

256
The American edition of The Washington Post publishes material with the results of the missile attack of the US-French-British coalition on objects in Syria. The material also contains satellite images of the results of the shelling of objects with cruise missiles. Recall that, according to Trump, the strike on Syria was “super efficient”. Satellite images are provided by the DigitalGlobe service, which analyzes satellite data.


The Barze facility north of Damascus:


Object Shinshar in the province of Homs. In the United States, they stated that it was “probably” stored chemical weapon:


The submission stated that the goal of destroying the infrastructure that would enable the government of Syria to resume work on the creation of chemical weapons has been achieved.

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the airfields of the Syrian air force, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel-General Sergei Rudsky, Chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense weapons.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/DigitalGlobe
256 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. vorobey
    vorobey April 16 2018 07: 38
    +3
    https://twitter.com/DigitalGlobe/status/985319969
    742381056 / photo / 1? Tfw_creator = ura_ru & tfw_site
    = ura_ru & ref_src = twsrc% 5Etfw & ref_url = https
    %3A%2F%2Fura.news%2Fnews%2F1052331117

    the comments here are incendiary ...
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 07: 41
      +5
      Quote: vorobey
      the comments here are incendiary ...

      Sanya, give a normal link
      Unfortunately, there is no such page!
      Hi hi
      And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?
      1. andranick
        andranick April 16 2018 07: 44
        0
        Correct the link. Rather, I’ll make the link from the first post correct, because twitter is evil: https://ura.news/news/1052331117
        vorobey, is this about that? Or was it in tweets?
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 16 2018 08: 01
          +15
          Quote: andranick
          https://ura.news/news/1052331117


          no, I shoved reviews of British and Americans on Inosmi last night .. an interesting resource .. you type a tag .. Trump hits Syria and there an article overview pops up ...

          In general .. trumped up .. Putin asked him to advertise 300 and he put a bunch of dibs in advertising Torov and Bukov ..

          in general .. it all seems like a deal .. laughing laughing
          1. Thrall
            Thrall April 16 2018 08: 17
            +32
            Forbes Journal Volumes Changes smile
            1. Sergey-svs
              Sergey-svs April 16 2018 09: 01
              +6
              The Americans are not even people, but semi-angels, incapable of lying and who don’t want to not believe ... lol Therefore, I decided to prove to all skeptics and those who doubted “new and smart” missiles how 76 Tomahawk missiles could fit in one destroyed scientific center ... Well, now it’s clear that everything the Pentagon has told is pure truth ... fellow

              laughing laughing laughing
              And this is the consequences of a “terrible divine” strike, this is how it looks from the air ... A great way to write off missiles shot down over Syrian air bases into one complex. yes

              laughing laughing laughing
              1. konstantin68
                konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 05
                0
                [media = https: //pbs.twimg.com/media/Da1JH6JX4AA-IB
                E.jpg: large]
                And so they fit.
              2. demos1111
                demos1111 April 16 2018 12: 14
                +4
                Some kind of circus. A bunch of axes flew into the building, carried it under the base of the foundation. Where are the fragments of concrete, reinforcement of brick, roof glass?
                Around the road along which cars drive up to 100.
                Do you have any idea how much time it takes.
                Woe to the United States with such analysts.
                1. YELLOWSTONE
                  YELLOWSTONE April 17 2018 00: 47
                  0
                  instead of Controlled Demolition, did all this take down?
            2. figwam
              figwam April 16 2018 09: 08
              +3
              76 NANOTomahawks spent on these three FSA buildings.
              1. tlauicol
                tlauicol April 16 2018 09: 41
                +3
                how many Caliber would you need for such destruction? fair
                1. voyaka uh
                  voyaka uh April 16 2018 09: 52
                  +12
                  30 pieces approximately. They have about the same power as Tomahawk.
                  A single Caliber, like a single Tomahawk, cannot be demolished.
                  large building. And there was a 3 building, each with two wings.
                  1. tlauicol
                    tlauicol April 16 2018 09: 55
                    +4
                    Quite right, even though the question was not asked to you. People are dreaming of some sort of foundation pits.
                  2. _Jack_
                    _Jack_ April 16 2018 10: 46
                    +3
                    By the way, from the Pentagon there is not a single photo of the destroyed objects, according to which our military reported that all or almost all of the missiles were intercepted by the Syrians, does this indirectly confirm the truth of this statement, what is the difficulty for the Pentagon to post photos of all the attacked objects? why only 2?
                    1. Blackmokona
                      Blackmokona April 16 2018 12: 06
                      +1
                      They posted pictures of all three attacked objects, but our media have not bothered to post them yet. Demonstrated at a press conference.
                      1. _Jack_
                        _Jack_ April 16 2018 12: 12
                        +2
                        all three? as far as I understood there were more or not?
                    2. Flyer_64
                      Flyer_64 April 16 2018 13: 02
                      +1
                      Quote: _Jack_
                      what is the difficulty for the pentagon to upload photos of all the attacked objects? why only 2?

                      The photos were not posted by the Pentagon but by the Israelis, the Pentagon only replicates them.
                  3. sdc_alex
                    sdc_alex April 16 2018 17: 02
                    +2
                    In the 90's, in Moscow, a hexogen charge was blown up, with a capacity of about 100 kg of TNT.

                    in Tomogavka warhead charge 130-300 kg.

                    compare the scale of destruction. What 30 pcs. You speak?
                    And the Americans say that not 30, but more than 60 missiles flew into these three buildings.
                    IMHO: wassat
                2. figwam
                  figwam April 16 2018 10: 23
                  +1
                  tlauicol

                  About 5-7 pieces.
                  1. tlauicol
                    tlauicol April 16 2018 11: 17
                    +2
                    Quote: figvam

                    About 5-7 pieces.

                    yes now take off your pink glasses and watch any movie dir. Konashenkova about what damage can cause 5-7 Caliber
                    1. figwam
                      figwam April 16 2018 11: 59
                      +2
                      tlauicol

                      I have not seen a single direct hit in the building of 2-3 Caliber.
                      But I know that the warhead of Caliber and Tomahawk is 450-470 kg of explosives, which corresponds to a bomb of 1.5 tons. A typical civil building will not withstand the direct hit of several bombs or KR.
                      1. tlauicol
                        tlauicol April 16 2018 12: 03
                        +3
                        and how Caliber tormented with one or two-story buildings have not seen? and how do militants sometimes run out of them alive?
                        about the 1500 bomb and about 450kg of explosives - what are you smoking? wasted time on you ..
                  2. YELLOWSTONE
                    YELLOWSTONE April 17 2018 00: 52
                    0
                    Quote: figvam
                    About 5-7 pieces.

                    up to 10, matches the video of a mass parish in the suburbs of Damascus
                    it would be unsafe for civilians to shoot down the Kyrgyz Republic or disorientate them, as well as have any chemical production there
                3. Sands Careers General
                  Sands Careers General April 16 2018 15: 24
                  +3
                  That something like this.
                  1. tlauicol
                    tlauicol April 16 2018 15: 40
                    +1
                    great! three missiles and one and a half one-story destruction!
                    in fact, it is for any KR or OTRK with warheads of 400-500 kg
                    1. Sands Careers General
                      Sands Careers General April 16 2018 15: 42
                      +3
                      Watch from 9:50 and enjoy.
                      1. tlauicol
                        tlauicol April 17 2018 04: 07
                        0
                        did you watch these cartoons yourself? fool and what does Caliber have to do with it?
                    2. figwam
                      figwam April 16 2018 16: 21
                      +4
                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      great! three missiles and one and a half one-story destruction!

                      And then 76 Tomahawks, 3 two-story buildings were destroyed. A maximum of 6 missiles flew in.
              2. New Year day
                New Year day April 16 2018 09: 45
                0
                Quote: figvam
                76 NANOTomahawks spent on these three FSA buildings.

                I do not believe, they lie. Maybe even everything
                1. figwam
                  figwam April 16 2018 12: 16
                  +3
                  tlauicol
                  Take the time to learn the materiel so you don’t look so stupid.
          2. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 April 16 2018 08: 23
            +7
            Quote: vorobey
            In general .. trumped up .. Putin asked him to advertise 300 and he put a bunch of dibs in advertising Torov and Bukov ..

            What a fool. Nothing can be trusted with him. laughing
          3. New Year day
            New Year day April 16 2018 09: 48
            +2
            Quote: vorobey
            in general .. it all seems like a deal.

            as early as Saturday came to this opinion, now there is evidence of this.
            But how they argued and cursed at VO!
      2. vorobey
        vorobey April 16 2018 07: 45
        +10
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Sanya, give a normal link
        Unfortunately, there is no such page!


        Estimate cleaned up like .. Last night I only posted when I built one troll in the subject ..

        the brief point is that western inhabitants themselves do not cut why 103 rockets are needed for two sheds .. laughing
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 07: 50
          +16
          Quote: vorobey
          count cleaned up

          On Twitter, quickly banned, swoop. Mark Feigin there posted a photo with Navalny and signed-Ida in the same column with the president wassat I wrote to him that he is a person of non-traditional sexual orientation laughing Burned account, banned, like the Kremlin Troll
          1. sib.ataman
            sib.ataman April 16 2018 13: 36
            0
            Found someone to trust!
          2. Yasen Ping
            Yasen Ping April 16 2018 19: 00
            0
            Romanov, your face itself is not a traditional Jewish orientation)))) what’s getting puffed up here?))
      3. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 April 16 2018 08: 16
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

        so the Americans didn’t shoot at airfields ... there were only three targets
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 08: 21
          +3
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          so the Americans didn’t shoot at the airfields ...

          And they say they shot
          1. Tiksi-3
            Tiksi-3 April 16 2018 08: 23
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And they say they shot

            and you still believe the word in one (which was caught on cartoons and killed Russians in Syria) and do not believe the others who were caught in the left pictures ???
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 08: 28
              +9
              Quote: Tiksi-3
              and you still believe the word in one (which was caught on cartoons and killed Russians in Syria) and do not believe the others who were caught in the left pictures ???

              I believe the USA
        2. Muvka
          Muvka April 16 2018 08: 33
          +4
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

          so the Americans didn’t shoot at airfields ... there were only three targets

          Good. There were 3 goals. And what was the total number of missiles? Or is it also not 100+?
      4. venik
        venik April 16 2018 08: 17
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

        =======
        Yeah! "Trump" - I saw ... He generally has "X-ray vision" - he even sees what is not!
      5. vkl.47
        vkl.47 April 16 2018 08: 28
        0
        Your Sanya is a typical mess
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 10: 01
          +3
          Quote: vkl.47
          Your Sanya is a typical mess

          Did you write this to me?
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 14: 25
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: vkl.47
            Your Sanya is a typical mess

            Did you write this to me?

            You Alexander, you .. I would not tolerate! hi It is an insult..
      6. dauria
        dauria April 16 2018 09: 14
        0
        And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?


        Yes, wake up already. Than the "outfitted"? A hundred FAB-500 high-explosive bombs, of which half did not hit (and even if it did)? This is not enough for the village. You can blame Putin, Moscow region and holy saints, but he is in Syria firmly entrenched with Assad. The enemy doesn’t sew with his bast, but he won’t climb into the ground campaign until he is hosted in the sky. And this is a direct skirmish with the Russian Federation. So they "quarrel" over trifles, but they do not dare to beat.
      7. Mar.Tirah
        Mar.Tirah April 16 2018 09: 43
        +2
        Yes! Https: //www.tomsk.kp.ru/photo/72419/1333284/
        Only there are no hits. And to the question of where the missiles were hit, the Special Corps Kotz Kotz answered. I will give you a map with a square of 50 kilometers and go in search of these missiles. Because they were shot down on the route to the targets, and not near them, and they do not lie with the markings of the country of origin. And the search for debris is not the purpose of the correspondent’s trip.
        1. Yasen Ping
          Yasen Ping April 16 2018 19: 03
          0
          even so Jewish rockets would be shot down .. and so that the return would fly into Lebanese airspace ..
  2. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr April 16 2018 07: 39
    +2
    Show some destroyed buildings. So what? Is this evidence of the production of chemical weapons? That would be funny if it weren’t so sad. Fake diplomacy is held in high esteem by the West.
  3. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 07: 39
    +1
    And there are no victims ... Everything is very strange!
    1. MadCat
      MadCat April 16 2018 08: 37
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      And there are no victims ... Everything is very strange!

      specially even for deep fools on twitter they warned about the blow, and what victims at night? Was there an overnight stay?
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 11: 45
        +1
        Well, I don’t know, but Damascus, as for the new year, was blazing with fireworks ..
        I increasingly believe in this particular version of what happened .. hi
        This missile strike was a contract .. Everyone is happy! he he
        1. freddyk
          freddyk April 16 2018 13: 12
          +1
          Mikhan, an agreement with FSA, a balm for your wounded soul? )))) Do not be fooled.
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 13: 31
            0
            Quote: freddyk
            Mikhan, an agreement with FSA, a balm for your wounded soul? )))) Do not be fooled.

            Still trying to understand what it was ..? But my soul is anxious, intuition rarely let me down ..! soldier
            1. freddyk
              freddyk April 16 2018 13: 57
              0
              I think there was no agreement. Trump had to be beaten to save face. So I made a firework. It would be very good if we also landed some kind of paddling pool to maintain our reputation. And they won’t believe us now. What will we scare?
              1. Vitaly Anisimov
                Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 14: 23
                0
                Quote: freddyk
                And they won’t believe us now. What will we scare?

                Well, Putin scared the West before the election and I think it’s not bluffing ..
                This is the weapon of a loan day though! In fact, these attacks of the USA did not decide anything .. The Russians are now sitting in trenches and fighting off on all fronts. he he
                In the west, the first nerves could not stand it! soldier
                We work men in the same mode ..
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 April 16 2018 14: 34
                  0
                  Quote: MIKHAN
                  It's a loan day weapon

                  What day belay
                  Quote: MIKHAN
                  In the west, the first nerves could not stand it!

                  Vital, remember the 90 year? They were constantly spinning around the box as their axes flew into the window. Impressive, to be honest. It would be necessary to stick on our Buki cameras, and then twist through all the channels.
                  1. Vitaly Anisimov
                    Vitaly Anisimov April 16 2018 15: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    Vital, remember the 90th year? They were constantly spinning around the box as their axes flew into the window. Impressive, to be honest.

                    And what about the 90s ..? I am here "comrades" from Israel are constantly writing about this .. hehe
                    And in all the "world media" the same ..)))
                    I don’t believe them, but there are few people like me in the world or they’re just afraid .. hi
                    1. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 April 16 2018 15: 56
                      +1
                      Quote: MIKHAN
                      And what about 90 ..?

                      No, you don’t understand, I mean the specific operation “Desert Storm”, where the Americans advertised their Tomahawks to the whole world. Video cameras clung to them when launched across Iraq. I wonder why they don’t catch it now. So they don’t have confidence that they won’t get knocked down. hi
                      1. sdc_alex
                        sdc_alex April 16 2018 17: 08
                        +2
                        or maybe they clung, and then the records looked and realized that it’s not worth publishing such frames winked
  4. Dr. Barmaley
    Dr. Barmaley April 16 2018 07: 40
    +1
    According to Trump, the strike on Syria was "over-efficient"

    1. Prisoner
      Prisoner April 16 2018 07: 46
      +2
      They have their own performance criteria. Our people do not understand. laughing
      1. Captain45
        Captain45 April 16 2018 10: 25
        +4
        Quote: Captive
        They have their own performance criteria. Our not understand

        That's right. In the West, even prostitutes' incomes are taken into account in GDP indicators, such as the services market. "Heh .. Peacocks, you say?" (with)
        1. sib.ataman
          sib.ataman April 16 2018 13: 45
          0
          It is a pity they still did not count the collective bunch! Also work too?
  5. svp67
    svp67 April 16 2018 07: 40
    +5
    The Barze facility north of Damascus:
    I wasn’t there, but knowledgeable people say that the main blow was not the scientific cluster, this research center, but the cultural-entertaining and educational one .... Surely "the enemies burned their own bathhouse"
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 16 2018 07: 44
      +15
      Two scientific blocks and one auxiliary.

      By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 16 2018 07: 46
        +6
        Quote: donavi49
        Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

        Pragmatic people, all in business, all in business ...
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol April 16 2018 09: 49
          +3
          than then, Caliber begins, when they try to demolish a one-story hut in the desert? Tennis Balls?
          P.S. you demand too much from a 450 kg warhead
      2. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 16 2018 07: 49
        +9
        Quote: donavi49
        according to them, 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with Nuclear weapons - in the sense of the Kernel

        I still think that the buildings were not easy.
        Built from monolithic jadeEg laughing
      3. IGOR GORDEEV
        IGOR GORDEEV April 16 2018 07: 55
        +5
        Quote: donavi49
        By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

        If the nuclei were stuffed with gunpowder, then it is likely that 76 missiles could cause similar damage on such a patch.
      4. SOF
        SOF April 16 2018 08: 42
        +13
        Quote: donavi49
        By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

        lol super accurate tomahawks. There is practically no scatter .... 76 hits at one point ....
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol April 16 2018 10: 04
          +2
          What's the problem ? on Shairat in 10n10m laid
          1. SOF
            SOF April 16 2018 10: 14
            +10
            Quote: Tlauicol
            What's the problem ? on Shairat in 10n10m laid

            ... yeah .... but this is the result of the impact of 40 tons of explosives from more than 70 missiles ???

            ... I won’t understand what kind of scam you are trying to pull an owl on the globe ???
            ... isn’t it easier to keep quiet modestly?
            1. Snakebyte
              Snakebyte April 16 2018 11: 11
              +5
              Quote: SOF
              ... yeah .... but this is the result of the impact of 40 tons of explosives from more than 70 missiles ???

              70 * 127 kg (explosive weight in the Tomahawka warhead) = 8890. 9 tons of explosives, not forty.
              1. SOF
                SOF April 16 2018 12: 16
                +2
                Quote: Snakebyte
                70 * 127 kg (explosive weight in the Tomahawka warhead) = 8890. 9 tons of explosives, not forty.

                ... vrrrret ... ...... But who, however, would doubt ..... the most "light" OFBCH 295kg ....
                or, now, will you claim that they were all cassette, and maybe vigorous? wink
                1. Snakebyte
                  Snakebyte April 16 2018 13: 29
                  +2
                  http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/bgm109c
                  _d / bgm109c_d.shtml
                  The strategic non-nuclear missile launcher BGM-109C is equipped with a single-unit (semi-armor-piercing) warhead, and the BGM-109D has a cluster which includes up to 166 small-caliber bombs BLU-97B of combined action (each weighing 1.5 kg) in 24 bundles.

                  Ibid below in the tablet
                  Warhead
                  BGM-109A nuclear
                  BGM-109C semi-armor-piercing - 120kg
                  BGM-109D cassette - 120kg
                  300 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead stands on the “Tomahawks” only in the Russian-language Wikipedia.
                  1. SOF
                    SOF April 16 2018 14: 00
                    +3
                    Quote: Snakebyte
                    300 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead stands on “Tomahawks” only in the Russian-language Wikipedia

                    .... all .... give up ..... " No. "
                    you won ..... about Assad, the defeated Syria, forever lying to the Russian Defense Ministry and everyone except you - I don’t know ...... but I definitely won ... ... ...........
                    tomahawks - the best missiles, the us air forces - the most air forces from all over the world, the state department and the pentagon - the most honest sharags in the whole world, and you are the best experts on this site ....
                    hi
            2. tlauicol
              tlauicol April 16 2018 11: 20
              +1
              were there any difficulties with math? 9 tons of explosives
              By the way, you can watch a video about the Pope of all bombs and evaluate the destruction with a single explosion of 44 tons of explosives. True pink glasses have to be removed ..
              and keep quiet modestly
              1. SOF
                SOF April 16 2018 12: 05
                +4
                Quote: Tlauicol
                and keep quiet modestly

                ... how they defeated .... wise guys .... ok ... about forty tons of your "Emerald" started a topic - I did not go into details ....
                ... go deeper ...
                .... here, uniquely identified in the Donbass, the funnel from Point U .... google the wiki mass of warheads ...

                ... here are the results of the "arrival" for one "Caliber" ....

                .... but the results of the "arrival" - 76 "Tomahawks" .... for those who do not see the first time ....

                .... conclusion ... either the Syrians are building their buildings on an alien technology, or your axes are a worthless waste of money, a bugbear that scared the whole white world ....
                1. tlauicol
                  tlauicol April 16 2018 13: 00
                  0
                  except for the Syrian photo you have only empty lines request
                  1. SOF
                    SOF April 16 2018 13: 56
                    +4
                    ...
                    FUNNEL
                    .

                    CALIBERS
                    1. tlauicol
                      tlauicol April 16 2018 14: 23
                      +1
                      Well ? one-story buildings ... Caliber ... continue to stand
                      1. SOF
                        SOF April 16 2018 14: 38
                        +3
                        crying

                        ... give up ....
      5. Moore
        Moore April 16 2018 08: 53
        +3
        They didn’t hit the excavator, decadents ...
        Joke.
      6. sib.ataman
        sib.ataman April 16 2018 13: 49
        0
        Lunar landscape. There Hollywood, apparently, worked all night!
    2. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker April 16 2018 08: 52
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      Surely "the enemies burned their own bathhouse"

      The United States decided to remind the whole world such as "Who is the boss in the house."
      A potential conflict is brewing in the South China Sea, as Vice President Mike Pence is planning to come to Taiwan, which will give a reason to unfreeze the "Taiwan problem." Therefore, Beijing is preparing for large-scale military exercises in the South China Sea, and right off the coast of Taiwan.
      In recent months, US authorities have stepped up the situation around Taiwan. A nearly $ 1.5 billion contract is agreed upon for Washington to supply Taipei with modern weapons. Which again warms up a long-standing conflict. And on 18 of April, the Chinese fleet will approach the Taiwan Strait, where the main phase of the exercises will take place
  6. Alexander War
    Alexander War April 16 2018 07: 42
    +7
    Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!
    1. Volodin
      Volodin April 16 2018 07: 47
      +6
      Quote: Alexander War
      I want to see from the General-Colonel Sergey Rudsky photos of the destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER!

      Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))
      1. Alexander War
        Alexander War April 16 2018 07: 50
        +1
        Remains of destroyed missiles!
        1. vorobey
          vorobey April 16 2018 08: 19
          +6
          Quote: Alexander War
          Remains of destroyed missiles!


          you have already been answered .. if you Grotesque did not understand then everything is bad ..

          Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))
      2. vorobey
        vorobey April 16 2018 08: 18
        +5
        Quote: Volodin
        Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))



        Well, it began ... you will pull out a claim to Trump for the provision of services of inadequate quality ... He had to advertise C400 at his show and advertised Buki and Torah ...

        again, the people's money wasted? laughing laughing
        1. New Year day
          New Year day April 16 2018 09: 50
          +4
          Quote: vorobey
          you her tramp claim rolled out for the provision of services of inadequate quality ..

          is logical. Everyone was waiting for the elephant, and a mouse flew in. There is deception
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 April 16 2018 07: 50
      +12
      The Pentagon officially announced that they had not bombed any airfields. It is the Syrians themselves who started shooting at Allah, when three objects are already in the dust.

      1) Borzoi - 76 missiles, destruction. Apparently, they used nuclear weapons (in the sense of the Kernel instead of warheads); otherwise it is difficult to explain why every 3 meter - with destruction of a rocket - is pretty limited.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 April 16 2018 07: 52
        +10
        Xnumx rockets here.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 April 16 2018 07: 54
          +10
          7 missiles here (entitled as a bunker - where chemical attacks are planned). Total 105 - from the entire coalition.
      2. 72jora72
        72jora72 April 16 2018 08: 33
        +1
        The Pentagon officially announced that they had not bombed any airfields. It is the Syrians themselves who started shooting at Allah, when three objects are already in the dust.
        So right, it makes sense to say that if everything that was launched at the airfields was shot down.
    3. Glock
      Glock April 16 2018 07: 52
      +12
      Syrian air defense destroyed all the tomahawks and their carriers ....
      It’s just that no one wants to humiliate partners, and they don’t tell the truth.
      Where are the satellite images of Donald Cook before and after the hit? There are none of them. Here I am about that. No more Donald Cook. He drowned, along with nuclear tomahawks, well, in the sense of which the nucleus instead of warhead
      1. IGOR GORDEEV
        IGOR GORDEEV April 16 2018 08: 02
        +6
        Quote: Glock
        Where are the satellite images of Donald Cook before and after the hit? There are none of them. Here I am about that. No more Donald Cook. He drowned.

        You better tell about 76 missiles fired at the "chemical center" in Damascus.
    4. milling machine
      milling machine April 16 2018 08: 01
      +17
      Quote: Alexander War
      Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

      But the coalition did not declare any attacks on the airfield.
      But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published. And then to believe the statements of our MO - do not respect yourself, how many times they have caught lying.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon April 16 2018 08: 36
        0
        Quote: frezer
        But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published.

        Very small pieces remained. Long need to collect in the desert. request
      2. LMN
        LMN April 16 2018 12: 40
        +4
        Quote: frezer
        Quote: Alexander War
        Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

        But the coalition did not declare any attacks on the airfield.
        But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published. And then to believe the statements of our MO - do not respect yourself, how many times they have caught lying.

        And how then can you prove that these are exactly the rubble? It is clear that this will not suit you.
        1. LMN
          LMN April 16 2018 12: 42
          +4
          And what for do you need the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to prove something to someone?
          Those who are fighting there, and so everyone knows. But Putin and Co., public PR is not needed. They silently do their job and for me it is enough.
    5. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 08: 57
      +9
      Quote: Alexander War
      Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

      It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol April 16 2018 09: 50
        +7
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        Quote: Alexander War
        Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

        It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.

        wait, Konashenkov did not find last year
        1. Tusv
          Tusv April 16 2018 10: 04
          +2
          Quote: Tlauicol
          wait, Konashenkov did not find last year

          And will not find. They were taken away to souvenirs in the cellars of the Moscow Region. bully
      2. Tusv
        Tusv April 16 2018 09: 51
        +1
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.

        Hang the drones over the second color points and enjoy the picture. This is not a problem for you lol
      3. the lord
        the lord April 17 2018 04: 01
        +1
        You really thinks. that two missiles with warheads designed to crush everything and everyone, meeting in the sky will leave large pieces? This is at test launches at the training grounds, you can still see something like that and then ....
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. Kleber
      Kleber April 16 2018 07: 45
      +4
      Izichka, Russia has officially stated - no one has denied.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Alexander War
          Alexander War April 16 2018 07: 50
          +3
          There is no faith in the Pentagon!
        2. Kleber
          Kleber April 16 2018 07: 52
          +2
          These even kinship with mom will be disproved ..... not for free of course.
        3. sdc_alex
          sdc_alex April 16 2018 07: 53
          +5
          If you have denied, then tell me where did the other missiles go? Or did all 103 really fly into these sheds ????
          1. Kleber
            Kleber April 16 2018 08: 00
            +3
            Quote: sdc_alex
            If you have denied, then tell me where did the other missiles go? Or did all 103 really fly into these sheds ????


            Excuse me, but did you personally sit near the barn counting them?
            1. sdc_alex
              sdc_alex April 16 2018 08: 35
              +5
              Clover, the fact of the matter is that I did not count them, but here is our portner lol with a cross on the flag claims that with the help of 103 rockets, worth more than a million dollars for each, you can destroy the whole 3 building and 2 shed.

              And if we take for granted the information that even these buildings were destroyed back in 2013, it turns out that the "formidable tomahawks" are completely incapable of anything .. well, or they were not equipped with warheads (warheads) at all and just flew into log quality laughing - then yes the scale of destruction is suitable laughing
              1. Kleber
                Kleber April 16 2018 08: 41
                +2
                I apologize, I only later saw that I didn’t answer, but to you.

                Commentary was on Ize.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. cost 75
              cost 75 April 16 2018 08: 34
              +3
              Quote: Edema
              There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25? winked

              Well, to destruct destruction from 10 and from 76 is possible.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Aaron Zawi
                Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 08: 59
                +8
                Quote: kos 75

                Well, to destruct destruction from 10 and from 76 is possible.

                Yah? There were two axes. How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?
                1. SOF
                  SOF April 16 2018 09: 19
                  +3
                  Quote: Aron Zaavi
                  How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

                  ... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...
                  1. tlauicol
                    tlauicol April 16 2018 09: 53
                    +2
                    Quote: SOF
                    Quote: Aron Zaavi
                    How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

                    ... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...

                    Why did it happen ?
                    1. SOF
                      SOF April 16 2018 10: 08
                      +4
                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      Why did it happen ?

                      ... "why" what?
                      ... remember? "What are you here?" - "What would it be!" (C) M. Zadoronov
                      1. tlauicol
                        tlauicol April 16 2018 10: 14
                        +6
                        where would the foundation pit come from?
                        Terminal Don. aer-ta, Brest kr. (East Fort 22 five hundred and one 1800), Nevsky Piglet (50 thousand shells and air bombs daily), Malta, Malaya Zemlya, etc. etc. - are there already pits?
                        Take a look how Caliber with one-story buildings are tormented - it's not for you to play in towns
                  2. Artemy
                    Artemy April 16 2018 10: 06
                    0
                    Quote: SOF
                    Quote: Aron Zaavi
                    How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

                    ... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...

                    Where did you get the idea that 76 flew to that center exactly "axes"? From "INOSMI"?
                    1. SOF
                      SOF April 16 2018 12: 19
                      +3
                      Quote: Artemy
                      Where did you get the idea that it was 76 “axes” that flew into that center? From "INOSMI"?

                      ... was attacked, according to the "true" data of the Pentagon, three goals ......
                      .... flip through the topic ... Donavi posted photos ....... for other purposes, judging by "destruction" wassat applied "less" ..... wassat
                      1. Artemy
                        Artemy April 16 2018 14: 56
                        0
                        Quote: SOF
                        Quote: Artemy
                        Where did you get the idea that it was 76 “axes” that flew into that center? From "INOSMI"?

                        ... was attacked, according to the "true" data of the Pentagon, three goals ......
                        .... flip through the topic ... Donavi posted photos ....... for other purposes, judging by "destruction" wassat applied "less" ..... wassat

                        When a person tries to comment and discuss something, it is assumed that he understands the topic. Nowhere and never did the Americans say that 76 axes were launched on this complex. It was a question of a total of 76 missiles, of which not all were KR. Will you find the source yourself or is it difficult for you?
            2. 72jora72
              72jora72 April 16 2018 08: 35
              +3
              There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25? winked
              Imagine yes.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. konstantin68
                  konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 17
                  +6
                  Learn, son! The teaching is light!
                  Have you ever seen the consequences of an explosion of “only” only 152 mm HE ammunition from the Acacia? So there is 8 kg. BB In the ax-130-300kg. Continue to continue?
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. konstantin68
                      konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 40
                      +4
                      Og, underground everything is in a mess, and the supporting beams and the foundation are standing. Or are they hanging? I'm confused...
                      1. Ezekha
                        Ezekha April 16 2018 10: 03
                        +2
                        why don’t they stand if the blasting occurs under a “cap” of fortified, reinforced concrete at a depth of 15 meters? winked
                      2. SOF
                        SOF April 16 2018 10: 05
                        +4
                        Quote: konstantin68
                        Og, underground everything is in a mess, and the supporting beams and the foundation are standing. Or are they hanging? I'm confused...

                        ...I understood laughing ... a person has a disease ..... "highly like" is called - and this is a diagnosis ....
                        wassat
            3. sdc_alex
              sdc_alex April 16 2018 08: 39
              +4
              10 or 100 - can even distinguish (ahem. Here should be the name of the great novel by F.M.Dostevsky wink )
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. sdc_alex
                  sdc_alex April 16 2018 08: 52
                  +4
                  so it’s necessary to study fool
            4. SOF
              SOF April 16 2018 08: 49
              +4
              Quote: Edema
              There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25? winked

              ... good people, especially for you, painted circles of hits .... count laughing 76 pieces of "Tomahawkers" got here

              .... taken from Cassada ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. SOF
                  SOF April 16 2018 09: 15
                  +4
                  Quote: Edema
                  III? Do you know what destruction should be from, somewhere, 40 tons of explosives? at least outline these circles, this is not an argument winked

                  ... your "expert" opinion, but to put a fact ...
                  Quote: Edema
                  III
                  .... iiiii .... horror what "scary" arms giant states will be. If on to destroy one building you need 76 super-smart-beautiful-new missiles, then how many then, in pieces, do you need to put at least one airfield into disrepair .... not to mention the whole of Syria ....
                2. Audiff
                  Audiff April 16 2018 11: 34
                  0
                  Look, https://youtu.be/Z2Zw5h9Xr_w man-made explosion in China .. And this is 21t. After the impact, the crater should be from so many axes ...
              2. Operator
                Operator April 16 2018 09: 28
                +3
                Cassad, as always, screwed up - the complex of destroyed Barze buildings included three more small buildings in the lower right corner of the building.

                In any case, after the impact of the 76 Tomahawks, corresponding to the same number of 450-kg high explosive bombs, on 3 + civilian buildings (and not on concrete caponiers of aircraft at the aerodrome) - as a result, an even field of gravel would have formed on the site of the block, which is not observed.

                You must be able to lie (that is, to misinform) laughing
                1. SOF
                  SOF April 16 2018 09: 42
                  +3
                  Quote: Operator
                  Cassad as always messed up

                  ... you are confusing something, I hope. It’s just with him that it appears as evidence of idiocy about claims for the destruction of one building with 76 missiles.

                  ... and therefore
                  Quote: Operator
                  You must be able to lie (that is, to misinform)

                  ...wrong address...
                  1. Operator
                    Operator April 16 2018 09: 55
                    0
                    As for misinformation, this is about the Pentagon.

                    Look again at the Cassada photo - three gray parallel buildings between three red buildings within a block



                    But space photos of gray buildings are also destroyed.
                    1. SOF
                      SOF April 16 2018 10: 03
                      +2
                      Quote: Operator
                      As for misinformation, this is about the Pentagon.
                      Look again at the photo of Cassada

                      ...understandably...
                      But the photo is still not his, someone, on an initiative basis, showed creativity ...
                      But even by adding two targets in the same area and redistributing the number of “probable” hits, we still have the “unmatched world” super-accuracy and super-inefficiency of 76 vaunted missiles ...
                      1. Operator
                        Operator April 16 2018 18: 52
                        0
                        Quote: SOF
                        But even by adding two targets in the same area and redistributing the number of “probable” hits, we still have the “unmatched world” super-accuracy and super-inefficiency of 76 vaunted missiles

                        Certainly.
                2. konstantin68
                  konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 55
                  +1
                  This humor was kakbe laughing
            5. ang450
              ang450 April 16 2018 15: 58
              +1
              Yes, I'm an expert. For a whole year I caught from the Donbass from 82 to the hurricane and saw what they can do. And this is ridiculous.
        4. IGOR GORDEEV
          IGOR GORDEEV April 16 2018 07: 56
          +4
          Quote: Edema
          The Pentagon has already denied

          Where are the rebuttals? They have them, but they will not show them to anyone? Or in their opinion with a high probability all missiles hit the target?
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. E_V_N
              E_V_N April 16 2018 08: 56
              +1
              Quote: Edema
              Their rebuttal is a photo of bombed buildings. Now it's your turn to refute the words of the Pentagon and show the remains of the downed Tomahawks

              Izya, well, I hope you don’t think that the Tomogawk worth millions of dollars is a simple blank without warheads? The last time they shot at the airfield there, the radius of destruction of the Tomahawk and the destruction of each rocket was clearly visible in the pictures. In these images, the impression is not of a missile strike, but of the detonation of an "ammunition depot." In addition, where is the certainty that the pictures were taken “in a minute and yes” of the blow and in the “minute after” the blow?
              PS Now there are so many "fakes" in the media and social networks that it is difficult to believe in the veracity of the photos and videos written and published.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. E_V_N
                  E_V_N April 16 2018 10: 35
                  +1
                  Quote: Edema
                  In this case, I am more likely to trust the Pentagon. He shows at least something, unlike

                  You can trust or not trust whomever you wish, it’s your right, the main thing is not to begin to trust “crooks with pictures”. There are the same "white helmets" not only pictures, but also vidyashki publish, so what?
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. E_V_N
                      E_V_N April 16 2018 14: 37
                      0
                      Quote: Edema
                      let’s not let it flow smoothly from the topic “who bresh?” MO or the Pentagon, on white helmets are completely different topics

                      Well, no one flows over, you just gave an example that the presence of a “picture” and a “movie” in the modern world has long been no longer an argument of veracity. 30 years ago, I easily changed the heads of characters in photographs 30 years ago, and now even "preschoolers" are capable of it, and you are a photo-argument of truthfulness fellow not even funny like that.
                2. Vasyan1971
                  Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 11: 00
                  +2
                  Quote: Edema
                  In this case, I am more likely to trust the Pentagon. He shows at least something, unlike winked

                  Precisely that "something." Hollywood also shows a lot. Do you tend to trust him? Just now, toy screenshots were shown about the evil Russians ...
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. Vasyan1971
                      Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 12: 11
                      0
                      Do not simplify. Those who follow the events know what and why those screenshots were attached.
                      1. Ezekha
                        Ezekha April 16 2018 12: 44
                        0
                        You do not fail out of the blue, just tell me - was it the Pentagon? winked
        5. 76SSSR
          76SSSR April 16 2018 10: 18
          +1
          The Pentagon has repeatedly denied the incontrovertible, these can.
          1. Ezekha
            Ezekha April 16 2018 10: 27
            +3
            Do not be unfounded. examples in the studio we'll see winked
            1. 76SSSR
              76SSSR April 16 2018 11: 42
              +1
              The US Congress conducted investigations that in CENTCOM the US Armed Forces changed intelligence to better illustrate the US fight against radical groups in the Middle East. You, as the representative of Israel, are ashamed not to know this.
              1. Ezekha
                Ezekha April 16 2018 11: 49
                0
                Very interesting, be sure to check out winked
          2. V. Salama
            V. Salama April 16 2018 13: 14
            +1
            Quote: 76SSSR
            The Pentagon has repeatedly denied the incontrovertible, these can.

            Yes, yes, and he also proved the unprovable.
            1. V. Salama
              V. Salama April 17 2018 21: 28
              0
              Here I just don’t understand - do they refute or prove something? Most likely this is called bear ...: https://youtu.be/WMhWmAruuAg
              (Barricade)
    2. Glock
      Glock April 16 2018 07: 55
      +5
      They were not 70% shot down by Izya, but 95%, plus the carriers failed ..
      It is better to underestimate the effectiveness of Syrian air defense. Let the Americans think that only 70%, but here we all know the truth. We look forward to the next salvo, and then a surprise laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. konstantin68
        konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 21
        +2
        But what's the difference how many intercepted? The main thing is that the impact efficiency is very high! I used to be afraid of 4k axes, now I know for sure that the collective farm “100 years without a harvest” will be enough to destroy them. Everything in my soul is calmer.
    3. anjey
      anjey April 16 2018 08: 47
      +7
      Rabinovich You are the largest DB in BV laughing
  8. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 April 16 2018 07: 45
    +7
    This is how the “axes” carry objects if there were no Russian air defense systems nearby. I won’t be surprised that foreign applications for our complexes from C300 and Buk will increase sharply ... Thanks to Trump for advertising lol
    1. Artemy
      Artemy April 16 2018 07: 52
      +11
      Quote: Alex-a832
      This is how the “axes” carry objects if there were no Russian air defense systems nearby. I won’t be surprised that foreign applications for our complexes from C300 and Buk will increase sharply ... Thanks to Trump for advertising lol

      Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

      Oh well.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 April 16 2018 07: 59
        +6
        Well, in general the blow was quite limited. At 800 meters from Borzi is the position of C-125. On her 0 arrivals.

        Or - they really chose the mildest type of blow - with a signal we will destroy you at any moment, as you want. (Pentagon version)
        Or - they underestimated the air defense (version of the Defense Ministry) - and had to take responsibility only for the 3 of the actually destroyed facility.
        1. andranick
          andranick April 16 2018 08: 06
          +12
          And I have a strong impression that the United States and Russia are testing their capabilities and probing each other, not fully revealing their potentials. Therefore, the American strikes were not so hot, and ours did not open.
        2. anjey
          anjey April 16 2018 08: 50
          +1
          Quote: donavi49
          Or - they really chose the mildest type of blow - with a signal we will destroy you at any moment, as you want. (Pentagon version)
          So tovarisch, it’s closer to the truth, but how did you lie reliably, even with cheating documentation, how did you lie, fingers lick and eat, it was your mother taught you in childhood ???? The type of strike was contractual, the ramp works for Russia ...
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 April 16 2018 13: 24
            0
            When? On the day of the hit? So I cited the Pentagon’s point of view - with its own slides (the first slides are always not of very high quality, on the other hand, the MO has only words).

            And the French 100% participated in the attack. They have already posted both video of launches from FREMM and from Rafaley. Therefore, MO either overslept them, or confused them with other carriers.

            In this case, the number of declared MO - 103 missiles, the Pentagon - 105 missiles. +/- converge.

            I repeat, there is a version of the MO - supported by words, a version of the Pentagon supported by photographs (and they even carried journalists to the research institute, the same Kots post photos in the KP), but not contradicting the MO in the category of confirmations.

            Again - there is an opinion that this is far from the end. Nicky won yesterday that the United States has 146% confirmation that Assad is working with Uranus.
        3. konstantin68
          konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 26
          +1
          Well, normal coordination. Do you think when Israel bombes Hezbollah, it does not warn everyone? Only those blows do not pedal in the media like that. If there weren’t all these approvals, long ago the trouble would have been.
      2. vorobey
        vorobey April 16 2018 08: 09
        +9
        Quote: Artemy
        Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?


        man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be that the Turks and Saudit will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not .. laughing laughing

        and you can discuss pictures as much as you like ..
        1. Artemy
          Artemy April 16 2018 08: 17
          +4
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Artemy
          Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?


          man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be that the Turks and Saudit will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not .. laughing laughing

          and you can discuss pictures as much as you like ..

          I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.
          1. vorobey
            vorobey April 16 2018 08: 29
            +7
            Quote: Artemy
            I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.


            in now everything rests on my logic .. laughing so be it .. wait?
            1. Artemy
              Artemy April 16 2018 09: 53
              +4
              Quote: vorobey
              Quote: Artemy
              I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.


              in now everything rests on my logic .. laughing so be it .. wait?

              There is nothing to wait for, Even if they refuse to buy, then you will immediately begin to claim that you refused "under pressure", and not because of the disappointment with the weapon. This is always the case with you - you should read your comments about the Indians and their disappointment in the joint development of a 5th generation aircraft.
          2. E_V_N
            E_V_N April 16 2018 09: 02
            +2
            Quote: Artemy
            I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

            If the old systems, the year before last, are effective against the existing weapons of the United States, then logically, the modern should be more effective, isn’t that the logic? Or do you think that if an effective shot is fired from a silicon rifle, then everyone will abandon modern weapons and begin to purchase flintlocks?
            1. Artemy
              Artemy April 16 2018 09: 50
              +2
              Quote: E_V_N
              Quote: Artemy
              I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

              If the old systems, the year before last, are effective against the existing weapons of the United States, then logically, the modern should be more effective, isn’t that the logic? Or do you think that if an effective shot is fired from a silicon rifle, then everyone will abandon modern weapons and begin to purchase flintlocks?

              You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.
              1. E_V_N
                E_V_N April 16 2018 10: 45
                +2
                Quote: Artemy
                You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.

                What do you think are weapons classes?
                Beeches and S-300/400 are air defense missile systems, therefore, by any logic, they belong to the same group (class) and if the beech is effective, then the greater effectiveness of the S-300/400 is implied.
                If you consider the class of "firearms" then yes, the pistol and sniper rifle are one class, but if you count the class of pistols, the class of guns, the class of machine guns .... then the flintlock and modern rifle belong to the same group (class), but the gun and the machine does not fit.
                1. Artemy
                  Artemy April 16 2018 10: 58
                  +1
                  Quote: E_V_N
                  Quote: Artemy
                  You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.

                  What do you think are weapons classes?
                  Beeches and S-300/400 are air defense missile systems, therefore, by any logic, they belong to the same group (class) and if the beech is effective, then the greater effectiveness of the S-300/400 is implied.
                  If you consider the class of "firearms" then yes, the pistol and sniper rifle are one class, but if you count the class of pistols, the class of guns, the class of machine guns .... then the flintlock and modern rifle belong to the same group (class), but the gun and the machine does not fit.

                  I will continue for you: If a short-range submarine is effective, then it is urgent to take a submarine, because it will be even better.
                  If Point-U is effective, then Yars is much more effective.
                  And therefore, customers never look at the nuclear submarines and Yars to buy them, but test the submarines and points. On this we will end. Good luck in building logical chains, but without me.
                  1. E_V_N
                    E_V_N April 16 2018 14: 46
                    +1
                    Quote: Artemy
                    And therefore, customers never look at the nuclear submarines and Yars to buy them, but test the submarines and points.

                    What to take is not always a question of efficiency, but mainly a question of money. Bentley will never become a mass car, just don’t screw it with various “goodies”, and Lada will be a mass car even in the absence of “goodies”
                    Quote: Artemy
                    Good luck in building logical chains, but without me.

                    Of course, without you, since with logical chains you somehow get a little crooked, it may just not be given to you, or maybe pride does not allow stupidity.
        2. IGOR GORDEEV
          IGOR GORDEEV April 16 2018 08: 21
          0
          Quote: vorobey
          man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be the Turks and Saudith will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not

          They may and do want, but they may be forced not to buy them.
        3. Mimohod
          Mimohod April 16 2018 09: 01
          +2
          and we won’t give a damn about the Turks if they don’t give up their happiness that we offered them, we’ll get out anyway and the Turks will be eternal slaves of the Yankees and Erdogash will quickly merge their own into the toilet, so of course they have a difficult choice, and show off here it doesn’t count, only a reasonable head ... laughing
      3. Alex-a832
        Alex-a832 April 16 2018 09: 20
        0
        Quote: Artemy
        Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

        If there was an attack on the palace, there would be interceptions. But, apparently, the palace was on the list of targets prohibited for shelling, where the official representatives of the Russian departments were located. Because the air defense system and were silent. Something like this.
      4. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn April 16 2018 10: 10
        +3
        Quote: Artemy
        Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

        very convincing argument hi
        1. Artemy
          Artemy April 16 2018 10: 17
          +7
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          Quote: Artemy
          Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

          very convincing argument hi

          What is wrong with the argument? Asadov’s "air defense falcons" were waiting for the "axes" to fly over the palace to start shooting them down?
          1. Stirbjorn
            Stirbjorn April 16 2018 10: 23
            +6
            Quote: Artemy
            What is wrong with the argument? Asadov’s "air defense falcons" were waiting for the "axes" to fly over the palace to start shooting them down?

            I completely agree with you, no irony - hurray to the patriots to keep bonnets about Syrian air defense
  9. cariperpaint
    cariperpaint April 16 2018 07: 47
    +6
    and the funniest thing you know?))) for example, the first before and after the photo the first was taken in August 2013))) is it okay right?)))))
  10. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 16 2018 07: 47
    +12
    1. Detonated a chemical plant and chemical warehouses. There are no consequences.
    2. All chemicals wisely, without human intervention, were annihilated out of respect for “democratic” bombs and missiles.
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. konstantin68
        konstantin68 April 16 2018 09: 28
        0
        I am writing to you .... From the front line, here!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    6. The comment was deleted.
      1. andranick
        andranick April 16 2018 09: 06
        +3
        What would you do if you were the President of Russia? Chet, I think, write comments - do not toss the bags
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. andranick
            andranick April 16 2018 09: 35
            +3
            I don’t see the logic in your actions, Eldar.
            The unleashed local conflict would inevitably grow to a larger one, and the question would inevitably arise of causing unacceptable damage to the enemy on its territory, which would automatically translate the local conflict into nuclear (on our part) and nuclear, chemical and bacteriological (on the part of the enemy, remember laboratories around Russia) confrontation. Then it would be more logical to immediately proactively strike nuclear warheads against the aggressor country, because one hell will come to this and there is no need to pull the cat by the tail.
            I understood you correctly: are you for an early unleashing of war using the means of mass destruction?
          2. NordUral
            NordUral April 16 2018 12: 03
            0
            The biggest risk of nuclear war is cowardice or treachery of the Kremlin.
          3. True
            True April 16 2018 12: 47
            +1
            It was necessary to answer more to the Turks. Even then, it became clear that chlo stsyko.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            3. NordUral
              NordUral April 16 2018 12: 06
              0
              We are all in a mental hospital, in adjoining rooms. Both in the country and in the world.
          2. Vasyan1971
            Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 11: 08
            +1
            Quote: manu
            if I had cartridges I would have shot you a damn liberalist

            You have horns. Butt.
      3. NordUral
        NordUral April 16 2018 12: 05
        +1
        But I’m not so sure of his unconditional victory in the election.
    7. Mimohod
      Mimohod April 16 2018 10: 41
      0
      Quote: manu
      In short, we wiped our feet about us, and we put our tongue in the ass,

      Well, you and soooooozel, emphasis on the first vowel, and not .....
    8. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 11: 06
      +1
      Quote: manu
      we stuck our tongue in

      It would be better if you didn’t take it out of there, once you put it in.
  12. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 16 2018 07: 49
    +6
    CNN cited a link by the Antagonist lined up a photo of the facility in Damascus allegedly before and after the attack. Israel states that it was bombed in 2013.
    (c) URGUVAYA
    The
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 16 2018 08: 03
      +5
      Kotsu on the spot just do not say, otherwise he walks along the steaming ruins and fasts it in the Komsomol.
      A UFO was really struck at this center in the 2013 year. But these were rather limited arrivals.

      https://www.kp.ru/daily/26819.5/3856087/
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 08: 09
        +2
        Quote: donavi49
        A UFO was really struck at this center in the 2013 year.

        And so I twist the picture and syak. I can not understand what is in the photo?
        1. IGOR GORDEEV
          IGOR GORDEEV April 16 2018 08: 26
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And so I twist the picture and syak. I can not understand what is in the photo?

          A relatively small fragment of some kind of mechanism.
          1. Zhelezyakin
            Zhelezyakin April 16 2018 12: 58
            +2
            With carbon fiber lining, moreover.
  13. mejik
    mejik April 16 2018 07: 54
    +8
    Amazing performance. 105 axes = Three buildings, two hangars and a barn. Choto laugh.
    1. milling machine
      milling machine April 16 2018 09: 26
      +6
      Quote: mejik
      Amazing performance. 105 axes = Three buildings, two hangars and a barn. Choto laugh.

      Yes, they are stupid, they can’t make a rocket right away with a target. Our "gauges" immediately go with the integrated headquarters of the igil. Where they fell - there is headquarters.
  14. dojjdik
    dojjdik April 16 2018 07: 59
    +4
    these strikes will be repeated periodically and on the rise here is the first 60 rocket and now the second 103 missiles and soon the third one on the way so under about 300 will be silent? snail position? the hell with them with soyueniks the main thing "I don’t know at all my hut from the edge"? Weak stars in Israel but don’t need cruise missiles; here you can get almost any zilch and howitzers to almost any military facility in Israel and it will cost nothing, but we will begin to be hypocritical and Syria is an ally and Iran, and sideways Israel, we begin a failed policy of hypocrisy and acting and unrequited rudeness very quickly lead the whole world to the third world; the main customer of Assad’s head is a war criminal and dictator netanyahu all the same it’s not for nothing that he came to Putin twice smiling sweetly and shaking his hand — the Jewish “copper pipes” in the sense of the Nobel Prize for “peace” are very hard to pass — willpower is needed and decisiveness against Jewish sucker
    1. Mestny
      Mestny April 16 2018 08: 33
      0
      "When they beat, you will cry."
      Not worth it yet.
      103 flew in. The efficiency for such an amount is close to zero. There is no reason to wring hands about "putinsil".
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 April 16 2018 08: 38
      +15
      The issue of impact efficiency.

      Last time, we actually burned a couple of planes (flying / non-flying - this is already a debatable issue) + local fuel and lubricant depots / bombs. That is, real damage was done to the army.

      Now. They officially destroyed the research institutes (where, according to the USA, Zarin / Chlorine was poured), destroyed a warehouse (where, in the USA, Zarin / Chlor was stored and bottled them), destroyed a certain bunker - where, in the USA's opinion, they planned chemical attacks. If behind the scenes there is not a couple of a / b bombed into dust - which, according to the gentlemen's agreement of the MO / Pentagon - are not announced, then the real damage to the army is about zero.

      Again about Khimki. Imagine that we are Assad. We have an unaccounted Khimki. The critical moment is a breakthrough through Teaching in Aleppo. On a small corridor, hiding along a building (along which hailstones are not very effective) - a large mass of broads in a small area enters. A breakthrough of the ring and the counter-body of a part of Assad’s troops could transfer the initiative into the hands of the broads (there is still a lot to mean who wins, doubters and neutrals always flow to the winner). Then there was a really critical moment of the war and Assad fought back on a thin one. It was then that I would have put Khimki in place of Assad. For the last argument. Plus, according to the broken construction, it will go well, it will flow over all volumes. And then there would be a counterattack. Well, in general, according to the patterns.

      Another point. The Battle of Hama a little over six months later. The KhTSh and SSA tanks entered the 2-3 km, part of the troops naturally draped. Losing Hama would even turn the war upside down. Also complicated (actually made impossible) - the supply of Aleppo. They would actually lose the 2 city after Damascus economically now (Hama did not know and does not know war - the only major city in Syria). Plus, they would have unblocked the Rastan enclave, at once moving the front to Homs. At this critical moment - when it is unclear who escaped and passes the winning broadcast from under Homs, and who is fighting. Khimki could be used to delay the strike and win 1-2 days for the transfer of troops. But again, by a miracle, on a thin one they fought off without a Khimki.

      And here - that a year ago, winning, the broads flee, and in order for them to run more fun, we shot one cylinder of Khimki. And now - the Duma is already in the queue for the Bus Tour, so that tickets are sold out faster, let's hit Khimki. Also one balloon. To the effect of real 0, only media.
  15. Prisoner
    Prisoner April 16 2018 08: 32
    +2
    Now they will mobilize their "free" media, network "hamsters" and will prove that the strike was effective at 10000% and even with tenths. Sorry sight.
    1. MadCat
      MadCat April 16 2018 08: 48
      +2
      Quote: Captive
      Now they will mobilize their "free" media, network "hamsters" and will prove that the strike was effective at 10000% and even with tenths. Sorry sight.

      even the last genius is clear that this is a complete and unconditional victory of the Syrian air defense! Urya! laughing
    2. victor50
      victor50 April 16 2018 09: 09
      +3
      And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!
      1. NordUral
        NordUral April 16 2018 10: 33
        +3
        Don’t put me on the team of “our” Supreme.
        I am ashamed of the Syrians, and ashamed of us! I am ashamed of our people that allowed this little man to steal the election victory from a worthy candidate to become President!
        My Supreme - Stalin or a man worthy of this name and a symbol of courage.
      2. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 11: 20
        +1
        Quote: victor50
        And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!

        Here on this occasion, just before the Vietnam War was remembered. War. Full-fledged. With napalm, orange (that's where the chemistry is!), Carpet bombing. So there is the same story - the Air Force, instructors, weapons. And no one was ashamed of the USSR. Vietnam, by the way, if you do not remember, recaptured.
  16. Terminolol
    Terminolol April 16 2018 08: 33
    +2
    If you take into account 2 photos, the absence of fragments of buildings (only columns of structures are visible), then they were made of cardboard and prices were 3 kopecks. In general, the photo seems to have been "slightly" retouched. Again, looking at 2 photos I see 5 hits (funnel), 107 rocket / 3 objects = 35 hits should be. Those. even 1/7 of the released tamahawks flew by the pictures, where are the others?
  17. Paul zewike
    Paul zewike April 16 2018 09: 04
    +2
    Now we can say for sure that tomahawks are useless weapons, the Americans have only about 4000. We divide by 100 and multiply by three. Altogether with axes you can destroy 120 unprotected objects. And I don’t know how many protected. Probably several times smaller. Not enough for Russia.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral April 16 2018 10: 31
      +2
      And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.
      1. Paul zewike
        Paul zewike April 16 2018 11: 04
        0
        Then it will be sad. To everyone.
      2. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 April 16 2018 11: 22
        +1
        Quote: NordUral
        And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.

        fool
      3. E_V_N
        E_V_N April 16 2018 14: 59
        +2
        Quote: NordUral
        And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.

        Oh how, the only problem is that the "Small" atomic munitions in 1-5 Hiroshima are all registered, the commissions count them individually. Well, the US does not have 4000 ammunition and bringing them to the borders of Russia is all the more imperceptibly impossible, from the word at all.
  18. Vard
    Vard April 16 2018 09: 31
    0
    For the production of chemical weapons ... you need a room of 20 square meters ... equipped with exhaust ventilation through a filter ... We put the pilot plant and go ahead ... Everything else is a lie ... and it is impossible to find it ... from the word at all ...
    1. Wilderness
      Wilderness April 16 2018 13: 04
      +1
      If from ready-made components - then yes, you can probably and in the closet to body. If from the primary material, with a full cycle (the production of any acids, etc.), then a full-fledged factory is already needed. By the way, the photo of the destroyed objects shows something similar to inclined conveyors. I saw such to move the ore to the crusher.
    2. V. Salama
      V. Salama April 16 2018 13: 59
      +2
      Quote: Vard
      For the production of chemical weapons ... you need a room of 20 square meters ... equipped with exhaust ventilation through a filter ... We put the pilot plant and go ahead ... Everything else is a lie ... and it is impossible to find it ... from the word at all ...

      And what are we going to produce - chlorine or binary sarin? How are we going to apply it later - run after the enemy and spray with a bucket? SDYAV and BTXV are different substances, this is first. Secondly, the goal of Western propaganda is to pass the first off as the second and blame those who are not involved in the use of chemical weapons (chemical weapons). SDYAV does not need to be specially produced, it is widely used in industry. The terrorists will use it - they will blame Assad, it’s very convenient. However, now it has become more convenient not to even apply, but to imitate the application (White helmets) or production (test tube with white powder). The use of SDYaV against troops is problematic due to low efficiency, as well as having BTXV (the basis of chemical weapons) if they are not binary (difficulties with secrecy of production, storage, preparation for use). So Assad has no XO in any way, which should be obvious.
      1. Vard
        Vard April 17 2018 08: 21
        0
        As events in Japan showed ... Zorin can be made literally on the knee ... As for chlorine ... it's good that the basmachi and their curators do not understand harmful substances in the industry ... And it pleases ...
        1. V. Salama
          V. Salama April 17 2018 21: 05
          +1
          Quote: Vard
          As events in Japan showed ... Zorin can be made literally on the knee ... As for chlorine ... it's good that the basmachi and their curators do not understand harmful substances in the industry ... And it pleases ...

          Synthesis of sarin is not an easy task. In the best case, 17% of impurities are obtained. You can try to do it "literally on your knees" - the question is what happens. Apply sarin in a closed volume (metro) - this is a week to take out corpses. In Japan, I still did not understand the information, it is too contradictory or something like what is now in Syria, idiocy and setup in one bottle. I remember there about a dozen people were very sick and had headaches, then, after a couple of months - that there were dead people, without indicating the number.
          Regarding chlorine, one does not need to understand harmful substances, but in the means and methods of their use, to know what is “inversion” and “isothermy”, otherwise it’s just zilch in the form of a yellow-green cloud. Chemical weapons may also be weapons for poor countries, as they once said, but with an educated population. Well, or if their specialists studied in the USSR VA.
  19. Operator
    Operator April 16 2018 09: 38
    +2
    For border iksperds - cruise missiles are equipped with a self-destructive device that fires in the event of an anti-aircraft missile, so it will not work to show a photo of a downed, but unexploded cruise missile.
    1. Snakebyte
      Snakebyte April 16 2018 11: 31
      +2
      Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?

      1. Artemy
        Artemy April 16 2018 11: 43
        +1
        Quote: Snakebyte
        Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?


        For MO, others do it

        1. Snakebyte
          Snakebyte April 16 2018 11: 44
          +1
          Well, the "others" were able to quickly find 8 lost missiles. But Moscow Region cannot find 36 a year already.
          1. Disant
            Disant April 16 2018 13: 02
            +3
            Are you out of your mind?
            what and to whom should MO show?
            what and to whom should the MO prove and seek?
            A year ago, missiles flew through the territory of several countries. They landed.
            - Ah, not landed? Then where are they, show me, you ask. So ask those who shot, let them climb and search to show you the result of hits, if the photos posted by the intelligence agencies of the world are not enough for you. Make them, let them dig the desert with their nose.
            .
            If the Defense Ministry found the wreckage for a long time, it was laid out in a row a long time ago and twisted back and forth, laid out and tried on the tooth, without posting what remained of the rockets
            1. Snakebyte
              Snakebyte April 16 2018 20: 22
              +1
              So MO evidence is not needed? They may say that they intercepted 100500 missiles. It may be said that a billion terrorists were killed by targeted airstrikes without hooking a single civilian. They can talk about unique products that have no analogues, which do not fly in the rain and fall at night, although they are considered all-weather and night.
              You can carry any nonsense, pseudo-patriots do everything, and they will prove to others.
              1. Cynic
                Cynic April 17 2018 13: 21
                0
                Quote: Snakebyte
                So MO evidence is not needed?

                In what century do you live the cutest?
                There is no need to interpret the rules for counting down WWII targets as the know-how of our army. Now the whole world is quite transparent.
    2. Kerensky
      Kerensky April 16 2018 15: 43
      +1
      cruise missiles are equipped with self-liquidator, which is triggered in the event of an anti-aircraft missile,

      What a fool you .... Self-liquidator should burn the necessary blocks, and not dudonin almost 7 meters and a diameter of 50 cm!
  20. bumerang.
    bumerang. April 16 2018 09: 55
    +1
    Shinshar facility in Homs. In the United States, it was said that it "probably" contained chemical weapons:
    But there is poison gas and sarin if you bomb, then you will poison the Syrians more. Do bombardments of chemical warehouses protect people from poisoning? And if they bombed last year and no one was poisoned, then there are no chemical weapons, why else bomb, your instructors are there too. If you were sure that Syria had chemical weapons, you would not have been bombed, since the cloud does not know where it will go, it could poison your soldiers. So they bombed for another purpose.
    Maybe they wanted to test their smart missiles, because last year, many did not reach the goal.
    Ivanka wept again and asked Trump to bomb Syria.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral April 16 2018 10: 28
      +2
      They bombed Russia and hit, which is doubly embarrassing! But ordinary Syrians, whose death, as it turned out, cost nothing to “our” rulers, good luck and the will to win! So these us, who are seated in the Kremlin and its environs, will surrender, choking on something. How long will we still come to our senses from liberal dreams?
      1. E_V_N
        E_V_N April 16 2018 15: 07
        +2
        Quote: NordUral
        They bombed Russia and hit, which is doubly embarrassing!

        Imagine, I even know where we got ... you probably got a lot of blows on your head this time, well, no luck, it happens.
    2. MadCat
      MadCat April 17 2018 04: 02
      0
      Quote: bumerang.
      But there is poison gas and sarin if you bomb, then you will poison the Syrians more. Do bombardments of chemical warehouses protect people from poisoning?

      in general, the components are mixed before use, the components themselves are stored separately. And the amount of explosives that the Americans dumped could burn anything.
  21. NordUral
    NordUral April 16 2018 10: 22
    +1
    The submission stated that the goal of destroying the infrastructure that would enable the government of Syria to resume work on the creation of chemical weapons has been achieved.

    And you don’t hesitate to admit that Assad does not have any chemical weapons.

    And if the country had a real Supreme, then the answer to the impudent sally of the Anglo-Saxons would cool their impulse, discouraging a repeat.
  22. Orkraider
    Orkraider April 16 2018 10: 47
    +2
    Quote: victor50
    And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!

    Why prove it? The proof for people involved in the analysis is a comparison of the 2015 map and the map from the current date. The help provided is obvious. Point.
    In the current situation, engaging in direct clashes, especially with superior forces and surrounded by "friends", is not reasonable.
  23. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov April 16 2018 11: 13
    +3
    1. Intercepted something or not is not so important here. Deaf defense was defeated again and always will be. It will be very difficult to intercept an inconspicuous CR capable of maneuvering with sufficiently large overloads. If to this we add that of the larger number of missiles, always more and fewer of them will break through to the goal of the air defense / missile defense task becomes practically impracticable. You can only respond to a blow with a blow - it is confirmed again and again.
    2. The calculation of this blow is driven by a wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran and Syria. The USA is demonstrating - look, if we don’t touch the Russians, they won’t protect you. In vain do you think in Russian you need to fulfill our conditions.
    3. If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.
    1. E_V_N
      E_V_N April 16 2018 15: 24
      +1
      Quote: Kostadinov
      1. Intercepted something or not is not so important here. Deaf defense was defeated again and always will be. It will be very difficult to intercept an inconspicuous CR capable of maneuvering with sufficiently large overloads. If to this we add that of the larger number of missiles, always more and fewer of them will break through to the goal of the air defense / missile defense task becomes practically impracticable. You can only respond to a blow with a blow - it is confirmed again and again.
      2. The calculation of this blow is driven by a wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran and Syria. The USA is demonstrating - look, if we don’t touch the Russians, they won’t protect you. In vain do you think in Russian you need to fulfill our conditions.
      3. If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.

      1. Whether interception or not was exactly the opposite, it is very important. Two new strategies are being tested here: the “disarming first strike” from the United States and the “deaf defense followed by a guaranteed response” from Russia. If the truth gets lost 2% of the missiles, this means the failure of the US strategy, but 70% flew to the target becomes not very important.
      2. This strike does not drive any wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran, and Syria. Russia said that Assad will re-elect the people of Syria and he will not be mixed up by the US coalition, it happened. No one in the West is already shouting that Assad should be immediately mixed and destroyed. The coup in Turkey with the help of Russia also failed and Erdogan retained his post. Iran was not bombed by the United States, but with the help of Russia concluded a nuclear deal on favorable terms for itself and received the lifting of 30 summer sanctions. You do not see the forest beyond the trees. The United States is now trying to save face, to show that they are doing what they want (but they don’t shoot at the Russians, by the way), Assad did not overthrow and did not want to and are ready to withdraw troops from Syria
      3. And a warning, hit get an answer on the rocket carriers is not that the answer? Notice the 100 missiles fired at 4 a.m. and not one dead, doesn't it look strange? And you can say anything, these are just words.
    2. Kerensky
      Kerensky April 16 2018 15: 48
      0
      If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.

      Come on! Can Syria have at least one rocket per ship ?!
  24. tlauicol
    tlauicol April 16 2018 11: 26
    +2
    Now, according to the First1, the Syrian asked the leaders why Russia does not protect them!? So Sheinin didn’t say a word more, shame
    1. Wilderness
      Wilderness April 16 2018 13: 00
      +1
      Shame, this is why the hosts did not ask this "Syrian": Why aren't you in the trenches yourself? I was bombarded with critical posts the other day, like: why not at the military enlistment office yet? But because there is no desire to die for the "hatskraynikov". Russia had oil, gas, metal, and now it seems that the main export commodities are soldiers, children, and sewers.
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol April 16 2018 13: 12
        0
        diplomat in the trenches?
        1. Wilderness
          Wilderness April 16 2018 13: 23
          +1
          A diplomat is not supposed to ask such garbage, he is an official (to transfer paper, accept paper, etc.). He asked as a citizen of the country. Imagine the next time he asks: Why didn’t the Russian Federation send us money, a lot of money? Didn’t give us a piece of your territory? ... No, I understand, they came there - you need to act, and not just stand aside ... but these quacks, that we still have something to do is a bust.
  25. konstantin68
    konstantin68 April 16 2018 11: 44
    +1
    Ezekha,
    I understand, you are a writer ... It's sad. Amen!
  26. bumerang.
    bumerang. April 16 2018 12: 13
    +1
    Quote: NordUral
    And if the country had a real Supreme, then the answer to the impudent sally of the Anglo-Saxons would cool their impulse, discouraging a repeat.
    Russia has a real Supreme, you don’t know why the missiles were only in the warehouse, and this is proof that there are no chemical weapons in that warehouse. Do you think that Russia could not repel the attack on this warehouse?
    If the Supreme would attack those who bombed, now they would analyze the actions of Russia, and so take the actions of the United States and its aides. After all, it was they who attacked Syria and according to their belief that there was a chemical weapon in that warehouse, they actually attacked the Syrians, because if there were sarin or other chemical weapons, there would be huge sacrifices. Here we will see the further action of the whole world.
    That is why the Russians chose Putin!
  27. Lynx33
    Lynx33 April 16 2018 12: 24
    0
    If we compare the satellite images of Syria 5 years ago with the current ones, then yes, the West did its best, wiped off the whole country, soon there will not be a whole building there. Such a fight against bandits hired by Western countries is not effective and victory within Syria is impossible in principle. It is time to learn from the enemy’s experience and launch this infection into their house, let them bomb themselves. Rather, it is not even necessary to run anyone, they let everyone in, they only have to set the wick on fire, let Europe burn.
  28. Bronevick
    Bronevick April 16 2018 12: 48
    +1
    If, according to them, chemical weapons were stored there, now chemical contamination of the area is now there. Is it better?
  29. G A_2
    G A_2 April 16 2018 14: 20
    +1
    ]
    Quote: Artemy
    Quote: Snakebyte
    Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?


    For MO, others do it


    Old photos? Is it tomahawks? Look in google what kind of photo you posted
    http://rahyabnews.com/fa/news/89194/
    1. tlauicol
      tlauicol April 16 2018 15: 15
      0
      the man just showed how fast you can find rockets ... if you look.
      our MO has been looking for more than a year, and the peasants in minutes find
      1. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex April 16 2018 17: 26
        +2
        Who told you that someone is looking for them? You need it and you are looking for it. What is it for our MO? What would be measured organs?
        We need to post a few photos on Twitter and instu, and do the thing, which the RF Ministry of Defense does. They repelled the air attack - repelled, there were no victims - no, there was no irreparable damage - no, then the job was done. And let the forum posts post tweaks and tweets.
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol April 16 2018 18: 16
          0

          Thank you for enlightening. they just don’t want to, I understand. Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets? Okay, I’ll take the word of MO, even though they’ve been lying recently
          1. sdc_alex
            sdc_alex April 16 2018 18: 30
            +1
            Quote: Tlauicol
            Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets?

            How is this interconnected? if no debris is found, then the SAM will self-destruct ??????
            you are talking nonsense.
            fotochki shot down missiles are needed only for trolls ... and even then they won’t believe .. why throw beads in front of pigs? wink

            Quote: Tlauicol
            just don't want to understand

            Well, at least something you understand? already happy. hi
          2. Cynic
            Cynic April 16 2018 19: 30
            0
            Quote: Tlauicol
            It’s probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems,

            Or it may turn out that you are right.
            I remember this at the training grounds, though it’s not rockets, but you won’t find you are tormented to unsubscribe ...
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. Snakebyte
            Snakebyte April 17 2018 19: 16
            0
            Quote: Tlauicol

            Thank you for enlightening. they just don’t want to, I understand. Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets? Okay, I’ll take the word of MO, even though they’ve been lying recently

            By the way, in this photo - R-40, apparently Syrian.
    2. Snakebyte
      Snakebyte April 17 2018 19: 13
      +1
      I am aware that these are the fallen Caliber, which the terrorists (apparently using special search camels) found in a few hours.
      In contrast to the "downed tomahawks", which "it makes no sense to look."
      And it makes no sense to search, because there is nothing to search. As today, at first they boasted that they shot down 9 missiles over Shayrat, then they admitted that it was a false alarm. So on the 14th, shot down missiles fled.
  30. Archivist Vasya
    Archivist Vasya April 16 2018 15: 34
    +1
    The S-200, in principle, could not intercept the axes that fly 50 meters, how and what the Syrians shot down there remains to be guessed. And the fact that ours this time too - "a hut from the edge, I don’t know anything" stayed up without firing a single missile - a disgrace negative
    What was so difficult to shoot down several missiles that flew close to our military ??? Just in case, well, at the same time, to show that we are there and the equipment is not inflatable and quite working. But no, they got scared.
    Someone says that they didn’t shoot down because they didn’t have to spend ammunition in case they were already going to hit ours ... damn it, why then there are so few missiles we have there ??? The mess.
    Well, and another version that is more convincing - an agreement with the Americans. As it turns out - they gave our ally to the enemies to be beaten, and in return we will not have anything. Naturally, therefore, we do not have allies.
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex April 16 2018 17: 33
      0
      Quote: Archivist Vasya
      What was so difficult to shoot down several missiles that flew close to our military ???

      The Defense Ministry made it clear at the briefing - "NATO missiles did not enter the Russian air defense zone."

      The fact that they are there is already clear.

      Quote: Archivist Vasya
      As it turns out - they gave our ally to the enemies to be beaten, and in return we will not have anything.

      They didn’t give it away, but covered it with air defense systems.

      And why are you calling for war ??? Do you need it ???
      Our Moscow Region chose the Solomon’s decision, they didn’t get into a big fight, they didn’t give in to the provocation, and they covered their ally. If ours shot down amers, who incidentally did not attack us, then this would be an act of aggression on our part. And so on behalf of the Syrians and under their flag ... providing technical support and specialists is a competent decision.
      1. Archivist Vasya
        Archivist Vasya April 16 2018 17: 41
        0
        The capabilities of the Syrians in the sense of air defense are very limited, what is the difficulty in providing them with modern systems for greater effectiveness? Again, check them out of the training environment, take into account the shortcomings. Shoot down rockets, not carriers, I'm just talking about that.
        1. sdc_alex
          sdc_alex April 16 2018 17: 53
          0
          I don’t know about you, but I weakly believe that the 70 with more than one missile shot down precisely the Syrian systems, under the control of Syrian experts.
          At a minimum, target designation, tracking, coordination of actions and the supply of ammunition were carried out by our ...
          And most likely some of our air defense systems worked (for example, Shell), therefore no casualties, there is no big destruction, etc. etc.
  31. VOENOBOZ
    VOENOBOZ April 16 2018 17: 11
    0
    If these pictures are true, then the accuracy of the hit is excellent. Perhaps they worked out guidance and positioning systems. It is impossible for an adversary to underestimate this, it can have a bad effect.
  32. 1536
    1536 April 16 2018 17: 13
    0
    Only a madman could bomb chemical weapons laboratories.
    Only a complete scoundrel or fascist could bomb targets in a foreign country, knowing that there were no chemical weapons there.
  33. Cynic
    Cynic April 16 2018 17: 29
    0
    purely rhetorically
    https://www.5-tv.ru/news/196942/?utm_referrer=htt
    ps% 3A% 2F% 2Fzen.yandex.com