In the United States published satellite images with the results of rocket attacks

The American edition of The Washington Post publishes material with the results of the missile attack of the US-French-British coalition on objects in Syria. The material also contains satellite images of the results of the shelling of objects with cruise missiles. Recall that, according to Trump, the strike on Syria was “super efficient”. Satellite images are provided by the DigitalGlobe service, which analyzes satellite data.

The Barze facility north of Damascus:

Object Shinshar in the province of Homs. In the United States, they stated that it was “probably” stored chemical weapon:

The submission stated that the goal of destroying the infrastructure that would enable the government of Syria to resume work on the creation of chemical weapons has been achieved.

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the airfields of the Syrian air force, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel-General Sergei Rudsky, Chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense weapons.

Comments

[vorobey]

https://twitter.com/DigitalGlobe/status/985319969
742381056 / photo / 1? Tfw_creator = ura_ru & tfw_site
= ura_ru & ref_src = twsrc% 5Etfw & ref_url = https
%3A%2F%2Fura.news%2Fnews%2F1052331117

the comments here are incendiary ...

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: vorobey

the comments here are incendiary ...

Sanya, give a normal link
Unfortunately, there is no such page!
Hi
And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

[andranick]

Correct the link. Rather, I’ll make the link from the first post correct, because twitter is evil: https://ura.news/news/1052331117
vorobey, is this about that? Or was it in tweets?

[vorobey]

Quote: andranick

https://ura.news/news/1052331117

no, I shoved reviews of British and Americans on Inosmi last night .. an interesting resource .. you type a tag .. Trump hits Syria and there an article overview pops up ...

In general .. trumped up .. Putin asked him to advertise 300 and he put a bunch of dibs in advertising Torov and Bukov ..

in general .. it all seems like a deal ..

[Thrall]

Forbes Journal Volumes Changes

[Sergey-svs]

The Americans are not even people, but semi-angels, incapable of lying and who don’t want to not believe ... Therefore, I decided to prove to all skeptics and those who doubted “new and smart” missiles how 76 Tomahawk missiles could fit in one destroyed scientific center ... Well, now it’s clear that everything the Pentagon has told is pure truth ...


And this is the consequences of a “terrible divine” strike, this is how it looks from the air ... A great way to write off missiles shot down over Syrian air bases into one complex.

[konstantin68]

[media = https: //pbs.twimg.com/media/Da1JH6JX4AA-IB
E.jpg: large]
And so they fit.

[demos1111]

Some kind of circus. A bunch of axes flew into the building, carried it under the base of the foundation. Where are the fragments of concrete, reinforcement of brick, roof glass?
Around the road along which cars drive up to 100.
Do you have any idea how much time it takes.
Woe to the United States with such analysts.

[YELLOWSTONE]

instead of Controlled Demolition, did all this take down?

[figwam]

76 NANOTomahawks spent on these three FSA buildings.

[tlauicol]

how many Caliber would you need for such destruction? fair

[voyaka uh]

30 pieces approximately. They have about the same power as Tomahawk.
A single Caliber, like a single Tomahawk, cannot be demolished.
large building. And there was a 3 building, each with two wings.

[tlauicol]

Quite right, even though the question was not asked to you. People are dreaming of some sort of foundation pits.

[_Jack_]

By the way, from the Pentagon there is not a single photo of the destroyed objects, according to which our military reported that all or almost all of the missiles were intercepted by the Syrians, does this indirectly confirm the truth of this statement, what is the difficulty for the Pentagon to post photos of all the attacked objects? why only 2?

[Blackmokona]

They posted pictures of all three attacked objects, but our media have not bothered to post them yet. Demonstrated at a press conference.

[_Jack_]

all three? as far as I understood there were more or not?

[Flyer_64]

Quote: _Jack_

what is the difficulty for the pentagon to upload photos of all the attacked objects? why only 2?

The photos were not posted by the Pentagon but by the Israelis, the Pentagon only replicates them.

[sdc_alex]

In the 90's, in Moscow, a hexogen charge was blown up, with a capacity of about 100 kg of TNT.

in Tomogavka warhead charge 130-300 kg.

compare the scale of destruction. What 30 pcs. You speak?
And the Americans say that not 30, but more than 60 missiles flew into these three buildings.
IMHO:

[figwam]

tlauicol

About 5-7 pieces.

[tlauicol]

Quote: figvam

About 5-7 pieces.

now take off your pink glasses and watch any movie dir. Konashenkova about what damage can cause 5-7 Caliber

[figwam]

tlauicol

I have not seen a single direct hit in the building of 2-3 Caliber.
But I know that the warhead of Caliber and Tomahawk is 450-470 kg of explosives, which corresponds to a bomb of 1.5 tons. A typical civil building will not withstand the direct hit of several bombs or KR.

[tlauicol]

and how Caliber tormented with one or two-story buildings have not seen? and how do militants sometimes run out of them alive?
about the 1500 bomb and about 450kg of explosives - what are you smoking? wasted time on you ..

[YELLOWSTONE]

Quote: figvam

About 5-7 pieces.

up to 10, matches the video of a mass parish in the suburbs of Damascus
it would be unsafe for civilians to shoot down the Kyrgyz Republic or disorientate them, as well as have any chemical production there

[Sands Careers General]

That something like this.

[tlauicol]

great! three missiles and one and a half one-story destruction!
in fact, it is for any KR or OTRK with warheads of 400-500 kg

[Sands Careers General]

Watch from 9:50 and enjoy.

[tlauicol]

did you watch these cartoons yourself? and what does Caliber have to do with it?

[figwam]

Quote: Tlauicol

great! three missiles and one and a half one-story destruction!

And then 76 Tomahawks, 3 two-story buildings were destroyed. A maximum of 6 missiles flew in.

[New Year day]

Quote: figvam

76 NANOTomahawks spent on these three FSA buildings.

I do not believe, they lie. Maybe even everything

[figwam]

tlauicol
Take the time to learn the materiel so you don’t look so stupid.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: vorobey

In general .. trumped up .. Putin asked him to advertise 300 and he put a bunch of dibs in advertising Torov and Bukov ..

What a fool. Nothing can be trusted with him.

[New Year day]

Quote: vorobey

in general .. it all seems like a deal.

as early as Saturday came to this opinion, now there is evidence of this.
But how they argued and cursed at VO!

[vorobey]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Sanya, give a normal link
Unfortunately, there is no such page!

Estimate cleaned up like .. Last night I only posted when I built one troll in the subject ..

the brief point is that western inhabitants themselves do not cut why 103 rockets are needed for two sheds ..

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: vorobey

count cleaned up

On Twitter, quickly banned, swoop. Mark Feigin there posted a photo with Navalny and signed-Ida in the same column with the president I wrote to him that he is a person of non-traditional sexual orientation Burned account, banned, like the Kremlin Troll

[sib.ataman]

Found someone to trust!

[Yasen Ping]

Romanov, your face itself is not a traditional Jewish orientation)))) what’s getting puffed up here?))

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

so the Americans didn’t shoot at airfields ... there were only three targets

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Tiksi-3

so the Americans didn’t shoot at the airfields ...

And they say they shot

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And they say they shot

and you still believe the word in one (which was caught on cartoons and killed Russians in Syria) and do not believe the others who were caught in the left pictures ???

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Tiksi-3

and you still believe the word in one (which was caught on cartoons and killed Russians in Syria) and do not believe the others who were caught in the left pictures ???

I believe the USA

[Muvka]

Quote: Tiksi-3

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

so the Americans didn’t shoot at airfields ... there were only three targets

Good. There were 3 goals. And what was the total number of missiles? Or is it also not 100+?

[venik]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

=======
Yeah! "Trump" - I saw ... He generally has "X-ray vision" - he even sees what is not!

[vkl.47]

Your Sanya is a typical mess

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: vkl.47

Your Sanya is a typical mess

Did you write this to me?

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: vkl.47

Your Sanya is a typical mess

Did you write this to me?

You Alexander, you .. I would not tolerate! It is an insult..

[dauria]

And by the way, did anyone see pictures of razgifagachennyh airfields?

Yes, wake up already. Than the "outfitted"? A hundred FAB-500 high-explosive bombs, of which half did not hit (and even if it did)? This is not enough for the village. You can blame Putin, Moscow region and holy saints, but he is in Syria firmly entrenched with Assad. The enemy doesn’t sew with his bast, but he won’t climb into the ground campaign until he is hosted in the sky. And this is a direct skirmish with the Russian Federation. So they "quarrel" over trifles, but they do not dare to beat.

[Mar.Tirah]

Yes! Https: //www.tomsk.kp.ru/photo/72419/1333284/
Only there are no hits. And to the question of where the missiles were hit, the Special Corps Kotz Kotz answered. I will give you a map with a square of 50 kilometers and go in search of these missiles. Because they were shot down on the route to the targets, and not near them, and they do not lie with the markings of the country of origin. And the search for debris is not the purpose of the correspondent’s trip.

[Yasen Ping]

even so Jewish rockets would be shot down .. and so that the return would fly into Lebanese airspace ..

[oleg-gr]

Show some destroyed buildings. So what? Is this evidence of the production of chemical weapons? That would be funny if it weren’t so sad. Fake diplomacy is held in high esteem by the West.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

And there are no victims ... Everything is very strange!

[MadCat]

Quote: MIKHAN

And there are no victims ... Everything is very strange!

specially even for deep fools on twitter they warned about the blow, and what victims at night? Was there an overnight stay?

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Well, I don’t know, but Damascus, as for the new year, was blazing with fireworks ..
I increasingly believe in this particular version of what happened ..
This missile strike was a contract .. Everyone is happy! he he

[freddyk]

Mikhan, an agreement with FSA, a balm for your wounded soul? )))) Do not be fooled.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: freddyk

Mikhan, an agreement with FSA, a balm for your wounded soul? )))) Do not be fooled.

Still trying to understand what it was ..? But my soul is anxious, intuition rarely let me down ..!

[freddyk]

I think there was no agreement. Trump had to be beaten to save face. So I made a firework. It would be very good if we also landed some kind of paddling pool to maintain our reputation. And they won’t believe us now. What will we scare?

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: freddyk

And they won’t believe us now. What will we scare?

Well, Putin scared the West before the election and I think it’s not bluffing ..
This is the weapon of a loan day though! In fact, these attacks of the USA did not decide anything .. The Russians are now sitting in trenches and fighting off on all fronts. he he
In the west, the first nerves could not stand it!
We work men in the same mode ..

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: MIKHAN

It's a loan day weapon

What day

Quote: MIKHAN

In the west, the first nerves could not stand it!

Vital, remember the 90 year? They were constantly spinning around the box as their axes flew into the window. Impressive, to be honest. It would be necessary to stick on our Buki cameras, and then twist through all the channels.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Mordvin 3

Vital, remember the 90th year? They were constantly spinning around the box as their axes flew into the window. Impressive, to be honest.

And what about the 90s ..? I am here "comrades" from Israel are constantly writing about this .. hehe
And in all the "world media" the same ..)))
I don’t believe them, but there are few people like me in the world or they’re just afraid ..

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: MIKHAN

And what about 90 ..?

No, you don’t understand, I mean the specific operation “Desert Storm”, where the Americans advertised their Tomahawks to the whole world. Video cameras clung to them when launched across Iraq. I wonder why they don’t catch it now. So they don’t have confidence that they won’t get knocked down.

[sdc_alex]

or maybe they clung, and then the records looked and realized that it’s not worth publishing such frames

[Dr. Barmaley]

According to Trump, the strike on Syria was "over-efficient"

[Prisoner]

They have their own performance criteria. Our people do not understand.

[Captain45]

Quote: Captive

They have their own performance criteria. Our not understand

That's right. In the West, even prostitutes' incomes are taken into account in GDP indicators, such as the services market. "Heh .. Peacocks, you say?" (with)

[sib.ataman]

It is a pity they still did not count the collective bunch! Also work too?

[svp67]

The Barze facility north of Damascus:

I wasn’t there, but knowledgeable people say that the main blow was not the scientific cluster, this research center, but the cultural-entertaining and educational one .... Surely "the enemies burned their own bathhouse"

[donavi49]

Two scientific blocks and one auxiliary.

By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

[svp67]

Quote: donavi49

Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

Pragmatic people, all in business, all in business ...

[tlauicol]

than then, Caliber begins, when they try to demolish a one-story hut in the desert? Tennis Balls?
P.S. you demand too much from a 450 kg warhead

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: donavi49

according to them, 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with Nuclear weapons - in the sense of the Kernel

I still think that the buildings were not easy.
Built from monolithic jadeEg

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Quote: donavi49

By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

If the nuclei were stuffed with gunpowder, then it is likely that 76 missiles could cause similar damage on such a patch.

[SOF]

Quote: donavi49

By the way, according to their data, the 76 KR flew here. Seen equipped with nuclear weapons - in the sense of the nucleus instead of warheads.

super accurate tomahawks. There is practically no scatter .... 76 hits at one point ....

[tlauicol]

What's the problem ? on Shairat in 10n10m laid

[SOF]

Quote: Tlauicol

What's the problem ? on Shairat in 10n10m laid

... yeah .... but this is the result of the impact of 40 tons of explosives from more than 70 missiles ???

... I won’t understand what kind of scam you are trying to pull an owl on the globe ???
... isn’t it easier to keep quiet modestly?

[Snakebyte]

Quote: SOF

... yeah .... but this is the result of the impact of 40 tons of explosives from more than 70 missiles ???

70 * 127 kg (explosive weight in the Tomahawka warhead) = 8890. 9 tons of explosives, not forty.

[SOF]

Quote: Snakebyte

70 * 127 kg (explosive weight in the Tomahawka warhead) = 8890. 9 tons of explosives, not forty.

... vrrrret ... ...... But who, however, would doubt ..... the most "light" OFBCH 295kg ....
or, now, will you claim that they were all cassette, and maybe vigorous?

[Snakebyte]

http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/bgm109c
_d / bgm109c_d.shtml

The strategic non-nuclear missile launcher BGM-109C is equipped with a single-unit (semi-armor-piercing) warhead, and the BGM-109D has a cluster which includes up to 166 small-caliber bombs BLU-97B of combined action (each weighing 1.5 kg) in 24 bundles.

Ibid below in the tablet
Warhead
BGM-109A nuclear
BGM-109C semi-armor-piercing - 120kg
BGM-109D cassette - 120kg
300 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead stands on the “Tomahawks” only in the Russian-language Wikipedia.

[SOF]

Quote: Snakebyte

300 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead stands on “Tomahawks” only in the Russian-language Wikipedia

.... all .... give up ..... " "
you won ..... about Assad, the defeated Syria, forever lying to the Russian Defense Ministry and everyone except you - I don’t know ...... but I definitely won ... ... ...........
tomahawks - the best missiles, the us air forces - the most air forces from all over the world, the state department and the pentagon - the most honest sharags in the whole world, and you are the best experts on this site ....

[tlauicol]

were there any difficulties with math? 9 tons of explosives
By the way, you can watch a video about the Pope of all bombs and evaluate the destruction with a single explosion of 44 tons of explosives. True pink glasses have to be removed ..
and keep quiet modestly

[SOF]

Quote: Tlauicol

and keep quiet modestly

... how they defeated .... wise guys .... ok ... about forty tons of your "Emerald" started a topic - I did not go into details ....
... go deeper ...
.... here, uniquely identified in the Donbass, the funnel from Point U .... google the wiki mass of warheads ...

... here are the results of the "arrival" for one "Caliber" ....

.... but the results of the "arrival" - 76 "Tomahawks" .... for those who do not see the first time ....

.... conclusion ... either the Syrians are building their buildings on an alien technology, or your axes are a worthless waste of money, a bugbear that scared the whole white world ....

[tlauicol]

except for the Syrian photo you have only empty lines

[SOF]

...
FUNNEL
...

CALIBERS

[tlauicol]

Well ? one-story buildings ... Caliber ... continue to stand

[SOF]

... give up ....

[Moore]

They didn’t hit the excavator, decadents ...
Joke.

[sib.ataman]

Lunar landscape. There Hollywood, apparently, worked all night!

[stalkerwalker]

Quote: svp67

Surely "the enemies burned their own bathhouse"

The United States decided to remind the whole world such as "Who is the boss in the house."
A potential conflict is brewing in the South China Sea, as Vice President Mike Pence is planning to come to Taiwan, which will give a reason to unfreeze the "Taiwan problem." Therefore, Beijing is preparing for large-scale military exercises in the South China Sea, and right off the coast of Taiwan.
In recent months, US authorities have stepped up the situation around Taiwan. A nearly $ 1.5 billion contract is agreed upon for Washington to supply Taipei with modern weapons. Which again warms up a long-standing conflict. And on 18 of April, the Chinese fleet will approach the Taiwan Strait, where the main phase of the exercises will take place

[Alexander War]

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

[Volodin]

Quote: Alexander War

I want to see from the General-Colonel Sergey Rudsky photos of the destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER!

Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))

[Alexander War]

Remains of destroyed missiles!

[vorobey]

Quote: Alexander War

Remains of destroyed missiles!

you have already been answered .. if you Grotesque did not understand then everything is bad ..

Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))

[vorobey]

Quote: Volodin

Satellite or conventional full fragments?)))

Well, it began ... you will pull out a claim to Trump for the provision of services of inadequate quality ... He had to advertise C400 at his show and advertised Buki and Torah ...

again, the people's money wasted?

[New Year day]

Quote: vorobey

you her tramp claim rolled out for the provision of services of inadequate quality ..

is logical. Everyone was waiting for the elephant, and a mouse flew in. There is deception

[donavi49]

The Pentagon officially announced that they had not bombed any airfields. It is the Syrians themselves who started shooting at Allah, when three objects are already in the dust.

1) Borzoi - 76 missiles, destruction. Apparently, they used nuclear weapons (in the sense of the Kernel instead of warheads); otherwise it is difficult to explain why every 3 meter - with destruction of a rocket - is pretty limited.

[donavi49]

Xnumx rockets here.

[donavi49]

7 missiles here (entitled as a bunker - where chemical attacks are planned). Total 105 - from the entire coalition.

[72jora72]

The Pentagon officially announced that they had not bombed any airfields. It is the Syrians themselves who started shooting at Allah, when three objects are already in the dust.

So right, it makes sense to say that if everything that was launched at the airfields was shot down.

[Glock]

Syrian air defense destroyed all the tomahawks and their carriers ....
It’s just that no one wants to humiliate partners, and they don’t tell the truth.
Where are the satellite images of Donald Cook before and after the hit? There are none of them. Here I am about that. No more Donald Cook. He drowned, along with nuclear tomahawks, well, in the sense of which the nucleus instead of warhead

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Quote: Glock

Where are the satellite images of Donald Cook before and after the hit? There are none of them. Here I am about that. No more Donald Cook. He drowned.

You better tell about 76 missiles fired at the "chemical center" in Damascus.

[milling machine]

Quote: Alexander War

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

But the coalition did not declare any attacks on the airfield.
But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published. And then to believe the statements of our MO - do not respect yourself, how many times they have caught lying.

[Piramidon]

Quote: frezer

But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published.

Very small pieces remained. Long need to collect in the desert.

[LMN]

Quote: frezer

Quote: Alexander War

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

But the coalition did not declare any attacks on the airfield.
But photos of supposedly intercepted axes could have been published. And then to believe the statements of our MO - do not respect yourself, how many times they have caught lying.

And how then can you prove that these are exactly the rubble? It is clear that this will not suit you.

[LMN]

And what for do you need the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to prove something to someone?
Those who are fighting there, and so everyone knows. But Putin and Co., public PR is not needed. They silently do their job and for me it is enough.

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: Alexander War

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.

[tlauicol]

Quote: Aaron Zawi

Quote: Alexander War

Meanwhile, at the moment there are no satellite images of the Syrian Air Force airfields, which were hit by cruise missiles. In fact, this may be a confirmation of the statement by Colonel General Sergei Rudsky, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, that missiles aimed at airfields were successfully intercepted by air defense systems. I want to see photos of destroyed tomahawks and JASSM-ER from Colonel General Sergei Rudsky!

It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.

wait, Konashenkov did not find last year

[Tusv]

Quote: Tlauicol

wait, Konashenkov did not find last year

And will not find. They were taken away to souvenirs in the cellars of the Moscow Region.

[Tusv]

Quote: Aaron Zawi

It remains only to see the wreckage of intercepted missiles. The fool's ax is healthy. 6.25m long and 0.5m in diameter. The debris should be large.

Hang the drones over the second color points and enjoy the picture. This is not a problem for you

[the lord]

You really thinks. that two missiles with warheads designed to crush everything and everyone, meeting in the sky will leave large pieces? This is at test launches at the training grounds, you can still see something like that and then ....

[Kleber]

Izichka, Russia has officially stated - no one has denied.

[Alexander War]

There is no faith in the Pentagon!

[Kleber]

These even kinship with mom will be disproved ..... not for free of course.

[sdc_alex]

If you have denied, then tell me where did the other missiles go? Or did all 103 really fly into these sheds ????

[Kleber]

Quote: sdc_alex

If you have denied, then tell me where did the other missiles go? Or did all 103 really fly into these sheds ????

Excuse me, but did you personally sit near the barn counting them?

[sdc_alex]

Clover, the fact of the matter is that I did not count them, but here is our portner with a cross on the flag claims that with the help of 103 rockets, worth more than a million dollars for each, you can destroy the whole 3 building and 2 shed.

And if we take for granted the information that even these buildings were destroyed back in 2013, it turns out that the "formidable tomahawks" are completely incapable of anything .. well, or they were not equipped with warheads (warheads) at all and just flew into log quality - then yes the scale of destruction is suitable

[Kleber]

I apologize, I only later saw that I didn’t answer, but to you.

Commentary was on Ize.

[cost 75]

Quote: Edema

There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25?

Well, to destruct destruction from 10 and from 76 is possible.

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: kos 75

Well, to destruct destruction from 10 and from 76 is possible.

Yah? There were two axes. How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

[SOF]

Quote: Aron Zaavi

How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...

[tlauicol]

Quote: SOF

Quote: Aron Zaavi

How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...

Why did it happen ?

[SOF]

Quote: Tlauicol

Why did it happen ?

... "why" what?
... remember? "What are you here?" - "What would it be!" (C) M. Zadoronov

[tlauicol]

where would the foundation pit come from?
Terminal Don. aer-ta, Brest kr. (East Fort 22 five hundred and one 1800), Nevsky Piglet (50 thousand shells and air bombs daily), Malta, Malaya Zemlya, etc. etc. - are there already pits?
Take a look how Caliber with one-story buildings are tormented - it's not for you to play in towns

[Artemy]

Quote: SOF

Quote: Aron Zaavi

How much then does it take to destroy this hangar in the trash?

... so you tell this to “Izhechka”, otherwise it doesn’t reach him that with a heap of 76 axes, in one place, such a foundation pit should turn out, and not what we are rubbed ...

Where did you get the idea that 76 flew to that center exactly "axes"? From "INOSMI"?

[SOF]

Quote: Artemy

Where did you get the idea that it was 76 “axes” that flew into that center? From "INOSMI"?

... was attacked, according to the "true" data of the Pentagon, three goals ......
.... flip through the topic ... Donavi posted photos ....... for other purposes, judging by "destruction" applied "less" .....

[Artemy]

Quote: SOF

Quote: Artemy

Where did you get the idea that it was 76 “axes” that flew into that center? From "INOSMI"?

... was attacked, according to the "true" data of the Pentagon, three goals ......
.... flip through the topic ... Donavi posted photos ....... for other purposes, judging by "destruction" applied "less" .....

When a person tries to comment and discuss something, it is assumed that he understands the topic. Nowhere and never did the Americans say that 76 axes were launched on this complex. It was a question of a total of 76 missiles, of which not all were KR. Will you find the source yourself or is it difficult for you?

[72jora72]

There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25? winked

Imagine yes.

[konstantin68]

Learn, son! The teaching is light!
Have you ever seen the consequences of an explosion of “only” only 152 mm HE ammunition from the Acacia? So there is 8 kg. BB In the ax-130-300kg. Continue to continue?

[konstantin68]

Og, underground everything is in a mess, and the supporting beams and the foundation are standing. Or are they hanging? I'm confused...

[Ezekha]

why don’t they stand if the blasting occurs under a “cap” of fortified, reinforced concrete at a depth of 15 meters?

[SOF]

Quote: konstantin68

Og, underground everything is in a mess, and the supporting beams and the foundation are standing. Or are they hanging? I'm confused...

...I understood ... a person has a disease ..... "highly like" is called - and this is a diagnosis ....

[sdc_alex]

10 or 100 - can even distinguish (ahem. Here should be the name of the great novel by F.M.Dostevsky )

[sdc_alex]

so it’s necessary to study

[SOF]

Quote: Edema

There and flew. Are you a great specialist? determine by eye - here 10 Tomahawks exploded and then 25?

... good people, especially for you, painted circles of hits .... count 76 pieces of "Tomahawkers" got here

.... taken from Cassada ...

[SOF]

Quote: Edema

III? Do you know what destruction should be from, somewhere, 40 tons of explosives? at least outline these circles, this is not an argument

... your "expert" opinion, but to put a fact ...

Quote: Edema

III

.... iiiii .... horror what "scary" arms giant states will be. If on to destroy one building you need 76 super-smart-beautiful-new missiles, then how many then, in pieces, do you need to put at least one airfield into disrepair .... not to mention the whole of Syria ....

[Audiff]

Look, https://youtu.be/Z2Zw5h9Xr_w man-made explosion in China .. And this is 21t. After the impact, the crater should be from so many axes ...

[Operator]

Cassad, as always, screwed up - the complex of destroyed Barze buildings included three more small buildings in the lower right corner of the building.

In any case, after the impact of the 76 Tomahawks, corresponding to the same number of 450-kg high explosive bombs, on 3 + civilian buildings (and not on concrete caponiers of aircraft at the aerodrome) - as a result, an even field of gravel would have formed on the site of the block, which is not observed.

You must be able to lie (that is, to misinform)

[SOF]

Quote: Operator

Cassad as always messed up

... you are confusing something, I hope. It’s just with him that it appears as evidence of idiocy about claims for the destruction of one building with 76 missiles.

... and therefore

Quote: Operator

You must be able to lie (that is, to misinform)

...wrong address...

[Operator]

As for misinformation, this is about the Pentagon.

Look again at the Cassada photo - three gray parallel buildings between three red buildings within a block



But space photos of gray buildings are also destroyed.

[SOF]

Quote: Operator

As for misinformation, this is about the Pentagon.
Look again at the photo of Cassada

...understandably...
But the photo is still not his, someone, on an initiative basis, showed creativity ...
But even by adding two targets in the same area and redistributing the number of “probable” hits, we still have the “unmatched world” super-accuracy and super-inefficiency of 76 vaunted missiles ...

[Operator]

Quote: SOF

But even by adding two targets in the same area and redistributing the number of “probable” hits, we still have the “unmatched world” super-accuracy and super-inefficiency of 76 vaunted missiles

Certainly.

[konstantin68]

This humor was kakbe

[ang450]

Yes, I'm an expert. For a whole year I caught from the Donbass from 82 to the hurricane and saw what they can do. And this is ridiculous.

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Quote: Edema

The Pentagon has already denied

Where are the rebuttals? They have them, but they will not show them to anyone? Or in their opinion with a high probability all missiles hit the target?

[E_V_N]

Quote: Edema

Their rebuttal is a photo of bombed buildings. Now it's your turn to refute the words of the Pentagon and show the remains of the downed Tomahawks

Izya, well, I hope you don’t think that the Tomogawk worth millions of dollars is a simple blank without warheads? The last time they shot at the airfield there, the radius of destruction of the Tomahawk and the destruction of each rocket was clearly visible in the pictures. In these images, the impression is not of a missile strike, but of the detonation of an "ammunition depot." In addition, where is the certainty that the pictures were taken “in a minute and yes” of the blow and in the “minute after” the blow?
PS Now there are so many "fakes" in the media and social networks that it is difficult to believe in the veracity of the photos and videos written and published.

[E_V_N]

Quote: Edema

In this case, I am more likely to trust the Pentagon. He shows at least something, unlike

You can trust or not trust whomever you wish, it’s your right, the main thing is not to begin to trust “crooks with pictures”. There are the same "white helmets" not only pictures, but also vidyashki publish, so what?

[E_V_N]

Quote: Edema

let’s not let it flow smoothly from the topic “who bresh?” MO or the Pentagon, on white helmets are completely different topics

Well, no one flows over, you just gave an example that the presence of a “picture” and a “movie” in the modern world has long been no longer an argument of veracity. 30 years ago, I easily changed the heads of characters in photographs 30 years ago, and now even "preschoolers" are capable of it, and you are a photo-argument of truthfulness not even funny like that.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: Edema

In this case, I am more likely to trust the Pentagon. He shows at least something, unlike

Precisely that "something." Hollywood also shows a lot. Do you tend to trust him? Just now, toy screenshots were shown about the evil Russians ...

[Vasyan1971]

Do not simplify. Those who follow the events know what and why those screenshots were attached.

[Ezekha]

You do not fail out of the blue, just tell me - was it the Pentagon?

[76SSSR]

The Pentagon has repeatedly denied the incontrovertible, these can.

[Ezekha]

Do not be unfounded. examples in the studio we'll see

[76SSSR]

The US Congress conducted investigations that in CENTCOM the US Armed Forces changed intelligence to better illustrate the US fight against radical groups in the Middle East. You, as the representative of Israel, are ashamed not to know this.

[Ezekha]

Very interesting, be sure to check out

[V. Salama]

Quote: 76SSSR

The Pentagon has repeatedly denied the incontrovertible, these can.

Yes, yes, and he also proved the unprovable.

[V. Salama]

Here I just don’t understand - do they refute or prove something? Most likely this is called bear ...: https://youtu.be/WMhWmAruuAg
(Barricade)

[Glock]

They were not 70% shot down by Izya, but 95%, plus the carriers failed ..
It is better to underestimate the effectiveness of Syrian air defense. Let the Americans think that only 70%, but here we all know the truth. We look forward to the next salvo, and then a surprise

[konstantin68]

But what's the difference how many intercepted? The main thing is that the impact efficiency is very high! I used to be afraid of 4k axes, now I know for sure that the collective farm “100 years without a harvest” will be enough to destroy them. Everything in my soul is calmer.

[anjey]

Rabinovich You are the largest DB in BV

[Alex-a832]

This is how the “axes” carry objects if there were no Russian air defense systems nearby. I won’t be surprised that foreign applications for our complexes from C300 and Buk will increase sharply ... Thanks to Trump for advertising

[Artemy]

Quote: Alex-a832

This is how the “axes” carry objects if there were no Russian air defense systems nearby. I won’t be surprised that foreign applications for our complexes from C300 and Buk will increase sharply ... Thanks to Trump for advertising

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

Oh well.

[donavi49]

Well, in general the blow was quite limited. At 800 meters from Borzi is the position of C-125. On her 0 arrivals.

Or - they really chose the mildest type of blow - with a signal we will destroy you at any moment, as you want. (Pentagon version)
Or - they underestimated the air defense (version of the Defense Ministry) - and had to take responsibility only for the 3 of the actually destroyed facility.

[andranick]

And I have a strong impression that the United States and Russia are testing their capabilities and probing each other, not fully revealing their potentials. Therefore, the American strikes were not so hot, and ours did not open.

[anjey]

Quote: donavi49

Or - they really chose the mildest type of blow - with a signal we will destroy you at any moment, as you want. (Pentagon version)

So tovarisch, it’s closer to the truth, but how did you lie reliably, even with cheating documentation, how did you lie, fingers lick and eat, it was your mother taught you in childhood ???? The type of strike was contractual, the ramp works for Russia ...

[donavi49]

When? On the day of the hit? So I cited the Pentagon’s point of view - with its own slides (the first slides are always not of very high quality, on the other hand, the MO has only words).

And the French 100% participated in the attack. They have already posted both video of launches from FREMM and from Rafaley. Therefore, MO either overslept them, or confused them with other carriers.

In this case, the number of declared MO - 103 missiles, the Pentagon - 105 missiles. +/- converge.

I repeat, there is a version of the MO - supported by words, a version of the Pentagon supported by photographs (and they even carried journalists to the research institute, the same Kots post photos in the KP), but not contradicting the MO in the category of confirmations.

Again - there is an opinion that this is far from the end. Nicky won yesterday that the United States has 146% confirmation that Assad is working with Uranus.

[konstantin68]

Well, normal coordination. Do you think when Israel bombes Hezbollah, it does not warn everyone? Only those blows do not pedal in the media like that. If there weren’t all these approvals, long ago the trouble would have been.

[vorobey]

Quote: Artemy

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be that the Turks and Saudit will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not ..

and you can discuss pictures as much as you like ..

[Artemy]

Quote: vorobey

Quote: Artemy

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be that the Turks and Saudit will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not ..

and you can discuss pictures as much as you like ..

I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

[vorobey]

Quote: Artemy

I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

in now everything rests on my logic .. so be it .. wait?

[Artemy]

Quote: vorobey

Quote: Artemy

I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

in now everything rests on my logic .. so be it .. wait?

There is nothing to wait for, Even if they refuse to buy, then you will immediately begin to claim that you refused "under pressure", and not because of the disappointment with the weapon. This is always the case with you - you should read your comments about the Indians and their disappointment in the joint development of a 5th generation aircraft.

[E_V_N]

Quote: Artemy

I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

If the old systems, the year before last, are effective against the existing weapons of the United States, then logically, the modern should be more effective, isn’t that the logic? Or do you think that if an effective shot is fired from a silicon rifle, then everyone will abandon modern weapons and begin to purchase flintlocks?

[Artemy]

Quote: E_V_N

Quote: Artemy

I’m probably not able to understand your logic. Shot down by Torahs and Beeches, and we will see the result if we do not refuse to purchase the S-300 and S-400, which did not participate.

If the old systems, the year before last, are effective against the existing weapons of the United States, then logically, the modern should be more effective, isn’t that the logic? Or do you think that if an effective shot is fired from a silicon rifle, then everyone will abandon modern weapons and begin to purchase flintlocks?

You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.

[E_V_N]

Quote: Artemy

You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.

What do you think are weapons classes?
Beeches and S-300/400 are air defense missile systems, therefore, by any logic, they belong to the same group (class) and if the beech is effective, then the greater effectiveness of the S-300/400 is implied.
If you consider the class of "firearms" then yes, the pistol and sniper rifle are one class, but if you count the class of pistols, the class of guns, the class of machine guns .... then the flintlock and modern rifle belong to the same group (class), but the gun and the machine does not fit.

[Artemy]

Quote: E_V_N

Quote: Artemy

You have a "logic", like vorobey. According to your "logic", if the gun proved to be effective (and the Torah and Buki and S-300/400 are weapons of different classes), then you need to urgently buy sniper rifles from the manufacturer.

What do you think are weapons classes?
Beeches and S-300/400 are air defense missile systems, therefore, by any logic, they belong to the same group (class) and if the beech is effective, then the greater effectiveness of the S-300/400 is implied.
If you consider the class of "firearms" then yes, the pistol and sniper rifle are one class, but if you count the class of pistols, the class of guns, the class of machine guns .... then the flintlock and modern rifle belong to the same group (class), but the gun and the machine does not fit.

I will continue for you: If a short-range submarine is effective, then it is urgent to take a submarine, because it will be even better.
If Point-U is effective, then Yars is much more effective.
And therefore, customers never look at the nuclear submarines and Yars to buy them, but test the submarines and points. On this we will end. Good luck in building logical chains, but without me.

[E_V_N]

Quote: Artemy

And therefore, customers never look at the nuclear submarines and Yars to buy them, but test the submarines and points.

What to take is not always a question of efficiency, but mainly a question of money. Bentley will never become a mass car, just don’t screw it with various “goodies”, and Lada will be a mass car even in the absence of “goodies”

Quote: Artemy

Good luck in building logical chains, but without me.

Of course, without you, since with logical chains you somehow get a little crooked, it may just not be given to you, or maybe pride does not allow stupidity.

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Quote: vorobey

man, I told you yesterday. I repeat .. that the best indicator now will be the Turks and Saudith will refuse from the announced purchases of S300-400 or not

They may and do want, but they may be forced not to buy them.

[Parade]

and we won’t give a damn about the Turks if they don’t give up their happiness that we offered them, we’ll get out anyway and the Turks will be eternal slaves of the Yankees and Erdogash will quickly merge their own into the toilet, so of course they have a difficult choice, and show off here it doesn’t count, only a reasonable head ...

[Alex-a832]

Quote: Artemy

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

If there was an attack on the palace, there would be interceptions. But, apparently, the palace was on the list of targets prohibited for shelling, where the official representatives of the Russian departments were located. Because the air defense system and were silent. Something like this.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Artemy

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

very convincing argument

[Artemy]

Quote: Stirbjorn

Quote: Artemy

Here is a research center that was carved like a tortoise god, but 10 km away. Presidential Palace Assad. Was there no air defense nearby?

very convincing argument

What is wrong with the argument? Asadov’s "air defense falcons" were waiting for the "axes" to fly over the palace to start shooting them down?

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Artemy

What is wrong with the argument? Asadov’s "air defense falcons" were waiting for the "axes" to fly over the palace to start shooting them down?

I completely agree with you, no irony - hurray to the patriots to keep bonnets about Syrian air defense

[cariperpaint]

and the funniest thing you know?))) for example, the first before and after the photo the first was taken in August 2013))) is it okay right?)))))

[Denis Obukhov]

1. Detonated a chemical plant and chemical warehouses. There are no consequences.
2. All chemicals wisely, without human intervention, were annihilated out of respect for “democratic” bombs and missiles.

[konstantin68]

I am writing to you .... From the front line, here!

[andranick]

What would you do if you were the President of Russia? Chet, I think, write comments - do not toss the bags

[andranick]

I don’t see the logic in your actions, Eldar.
The unleashed local conflict would inevitably grow to a larger one, and the question would inevitably arise of causing unacceptable damage to the enemy on its territory, which would automatically translate the local conflict into nuclear (on our part) and nuclear, chemical and bacteriological (on the part of the enemy, remember laboratories around Russia) confrontation. Then it would be more logical to immediately proactively strike nuclear warheads against the aggressor country, because one hell will come to this and there is no need to pull the cat by the tail.
I understood you correctly: are you for an early unleashing of war using the means of mass destruction?

[NordUral]

The biggest risk of nuclear war is cowardice or treachery of the Kremlin.

[True]

It was necessary to answer more to the Turks. Even then, it became clear that chlo stsyko.

[NordUral]

We are all in a mental hospital, in adjoining rooms. Both in the country and in the world.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: manu

if I had cartridges I would have shot you a damn liberalist

You have horns. Butt.

[NordUral]

But I’m not so sure of his unconditional victory in the election.

[Parade]

Quote: manu

In short, we wiped our feet about us, and we put our tongue in the ass,

Well, you and soooooozel, emphasis on the first vowel, and not .....

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: manu

we stuck our tongue in

It would be better if you didn’t take it out of there, once you put it in.

[Denis Obukhov]

CNN cited a link by the Antagonist lined up a photo of the facility in Damascus allegedly before and after the attack. Israel states that it was bombed in 2013.
(c) URGUVAYA
The

[donavi49]

Kotsu on the spot just do not say, otherwise he walks along the steaming ruins and fasts it in the Komsomol.
A UFO was really struck at this center in the 2013 year. But these were rather limited arrivals.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/26819.5/3856087/

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: donavi49

A UFO was really struck at this center in the 2013 year.

And so I twist the picture and syak. I can not understand what is in the photo?

[IGOR GORDEEV]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And so I twist the picture and syak. I can not understand what is in the photo?

A relatively small fragment of some kind of mechanism.

[Zhelezyakin]

With carbon fiber lining, moreover.

[mejik]

Amazing performance. 105 axes = Three buildings, two hangars and a barn. Choto laugh.

[milling machine]

Quote: mejik

Amazing performance. 105 axes = Three buildings, two hangars and a barn. Choto laugh.

Yes, they are stupid, they can’t make a rocket right away with a target. Our "gauges" immediately go with the integrated headquarters of the igil. Where they fell - there is headquarters.

[dojjdik]

these strikes will be repeated periodically and on the rise here is the first 60 rocket and now the second 103 missiles and soon the third one on the way so under about 300 will be silent? snail position? the hell with them with soyueniks the main thing "I don’t know at all my hut from the edge"? Weak stars in Israel but don’t need cruise missiles; here you can get almost any zilch and howitzers to almost any military facility in Israel and it will cost nothing, but we will begin to be hypocritical and Syria is an ally and Iran, and sideways Israel, we begin a failed policy of hypocrisy and acting and unrequited rudeness very quickly lead the whole world to the third world; the main customer of Assad’s head is a war criminal and dictator netanyahu all the same it’s not for nothing that he came to Putin twice smiling sweetly and shaking his hand — the Jewish “copper pipes” in the sense of the Nobel Prize for “peace” are very hard to pass — willpower is needed and decisiveness against Jewish sucker

[Mestny]

"When they beat, you will cry."
Not worth it yet.
103 flew in. The efficiency for such an amount is close to zero. There is no reason to wring hands about "putinsil".

[donavi49]

The issue of impact efficiency.

Last time, we actually burned a couple of planes (flying / non-flying - this is already a debatable issue) + local fuel and lubricant depots / bombs. That is, real damage was done to the army.

Now. They officially destroyed the research institutes (where, according to the USA, Zarin / Chlorine was poured), destroyed a warehouse (where, in the USA, Zarin / Chlor was stored and bottled them), destroyed a certain bunker - where, in the USA's opinion, they planned chemical attacks. If behind the scenes there is not a couple of a / b bombed into dust - which, according to the gentlemen's agreement of the MO / Pentagon - are not announced, then the real damage to the army is about zero.

Again about Khimki. Imagine that we are Assad. We have an unaccounted Khimki. The critical moment is a breakthrough through Teaching in Aleppo. On a small corridor, hiding along a building (along which hailstones are not very effective) - a large mass of broads in a small area enters. A breakthrough of the ring and the counter-body of a part of Assad’s troops could transfer the initiative into the hands of the broads (there is still a lot to mean who wins, doubters and neutrals always flow to the winner). Then there was a really critical moment of the war and Assad fought back on a thin one. It was then that I would have put Khimki in place of Assad. For the last argument. Plus, according to the broken construction, it will go well, it will flow over all volumes. And then there would be a counterattack. Well, in general, according to the patterns.

Another point. The Battle of Hama a little over six months later. The KhTSh and SSA tanks entered the 2-3 km, part of the troops naturally draped. Losing Hama would even turn the war upside down. Also complicated (actually made impossible) - the supply of Aleppo. They would actually lose the 2 city after Damascus economically now (Hama did not know and does not know war - the only major city in Syria). Plus, they would have unblocked the Rastan enclave, at once moving the front to Homs. At this critical moment - when it is unclear who escaped and passes the winning broadcast from under Homs, and who is fighting. Khimki could be used to delay the strike and win 1-2 days for the transfer of troops. But again, by a miracle, on a thin one they fought off without a Khimki.

And here - that a year ago, winning, the broads flee, and in order for them to run more fun, we shot one cylinder of Khimki. And now - the Duma is already in the queue for the Bus Tour, so that tickets are sold out faster, let's hit Khimki. Also one balloon. To the effect of real 0, only media.

[Prisoner]

Now they will mobilize their "free" media, network "hamsters" and will prove that the strike was effective at 10000% and even with tenths. Sorry sight.

[MadCat]

Quote: Captive

Now they will mobilize their "free" media, network "hamsters" and will prove that the strike was effective at 10000% and even with tenths. Sorry sight.

even the last genius is clear that this is a complete and unconditional victory of the Syrian air defense! Urya!

[victor50]

And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!

[NordUral]

Don’t put me on the team of “our” Supreme.
I am ashamed of the Syrians, and ashamed of us! I am ashamed of our people that allowed this little man to steal the election victory from a worthy candidate to become President!
My Supreme - Stalin or a man worthy of this name and a symbol of courage.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: victor50

And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!

Here on this occasion, just before the Vietnam War was remembered. War. Full-fledged. With napalm, orange (that's where the chemistry is!), Carpet bombing. So there is the same story - the Air Force, instructors, weapons. And no one was ashamed of the USSR. Vietnam, by the way, if you do not remember, recaptured.

[Terminolol]

If you take into account 2 photos, the absence of fragments of buildings (only columns of structures are visible), then they were made of cardboard and prices were 3 kopecks. In general, the photo seems to have been "slightly" retouched. Again, looking at 2 photos I see 5 hits (funnel), 107 rocket / 3 objects = 35 hits should be. Those. even 1/7 of the released tamahawks flew by the pictures, where are the others?

[Paul zewike]

Now we can say for sure that tomahawks are useless weapons, the Americans have only about 4000. We divide by 100 and multiply by three. Altogether with axes you can destroy 120 unprotected objects. And I don’t know how many protected. Probably several times smaller. Not enough for Russia.

[NordUral]

And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.

[Paul zewike]

Then it will be sad. To everyone.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: NordUral

And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.

[E_V_N]

Quote: NordUral

And who will believe that it will be ordinary explosives. "Small" atomic ammunition in 1-5 Hiroshima, what then you say about a little.

Oh how, the only problem is that the "Small" atomic munitions in 1-5 Hiroshima are all registered, the commissions count them individually. Well, the US does not have 4000 ammunition and bringing them to the borders of Russia is all the more imperceptibly impossible, from the word at all.

[Vard]

For the production of chemical weapons ... you need a room of 20 square meters ... equipped with exhaust ventilation through a filter ... We put the pilot plant and go ahead ... Everything else is a lie ... and it is impossible to find it ... from the word at all ...

[Wilderness]

If from ready-made components - then yes, you can probably and in the closet to body. If from the primary material, with a full cycle (the production of any acids, etc.), then a full-fledged factory is already needed. By the way, the photo of the destroyed objects shows something similar to inclined conveyors. I saw such to move the ore to the crusher.

[V. Salama]

Quote: Vard

For the production of chemical weapons ... you need a room of 20 square meters ... equipped with exhaust ventilation through a filter ... We put the pilot plant and go ahead ... Everything else is a lie ... and it is impossible to find it ... from the word at all ...

And what are we going to produce - chlorine or binary sarin? How are we going to apply it later - run after the enemy and spray with a bucket? SDYAV and BTXV are different substances, this is first. Secondly, the goal of Western propaganda is to pass the first off as the second and blame those who are not involved in the use of chemical weapons (chemical weapons). SDYAV does not need to be specially produced, it is widely used in industry. The terrorists will use it - they will blame Assad, it’s very convenient. However, now it has become more convenient not to even apply, but to imitate the application (White helmets) or production (test tube with white powder). The use of SDYaV against troops is problematic due to low efficiency, as well as having BTXV (the basis of chemical weapons) if they are not binary (difficulties with secrecy of production, storage, preparation for use). So Assad has no XO in any way, which should be obvious.

[Vard]

As events in Japan showed ... Zorin can be made literally on the knee ... As for chlorine ... it's good that the basmachi and their curators do not understand harmful substances in the industry ... And it pleases ...

[V. Salama]

Quote: Vard

As events in Japan showed ... Zorin can be made literally on the knee ... As for chlorine ... it's good that the basmachi and their curators do not understand harmful substances in the industry ... And it pleases ...

Synthesis of sarin is not an easy task. In the best case, 17% of impurities are obtained. You can try to do it "literally on your knees" - the question is what happens. Apply sarin in a closed volume (metro) - this is a week to take out corpses. In Japan, I still did not understand the information, it is too contradictory or something like what is now in Syria, idiocy and setup in one bottle. I remember there about a dozen people were very sick and had headaches, then, after a couple of months - that there were dead people, without indicating the number.
Regarding chlorine, one does not need to understand harmful substances, but in the means and methods of their use, to know what is “inversion” and “isothermy”, otherwise it’s just zilch in the form of a yellow-green cloud. Chemical weapons may also be weapons for poor countries, as they once said, but with an educated population. Well, or if their specialists studied in the USSR VA.

[Operator]

For border iksperds - cruise missiles are equipped with a self-destructive device that fires in the event of an anti-aircraft missile, so it will not work to show a photo of a downed, but unexploded cruise missile.

[Snakebyte]

Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?

[Artemy]

Quote: Snakebyte

Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?

For MO, others do it

[Snakebyte]

Well, the "others" were able to quickly find 8 lost missiles. But Moscow Region cannot find 36 a year already.

[Disant]

Are you out of your mind?
what and to whom should MO show?
what and to whom should the MO prove and seek?
A year ago, missiles flew through the territory of several countries. They landed.
- Ah, not landed? Then where are they, show me, you ask. So ask those who shot, let them climb and search to show you the result of hits, if the photos posted by the intelligence agencies of the world are not enough for you. Make them, let them dig the desert with their nose.
.
If the Defense Ministry found the wreckage for a long time, it was laid out in a row a long time ago and twisted back and forth, laid out and tried on the tooth, without posting what remained of the rockets

[Snakebyte]

So MO evidence is not needed? They may say that they intercepted 100500 missiles. It may be said that a billion terrorists were killed by targeted airstrikes without hooking a single civilian. They can talk about unique products that have no analogues, which do not fly in the rain and fall at night, although they are considered all-weather and night.
You can carry any nonsense, pseudo-patriots do everything, and they will prove to others.

[Cynic]

Quote: Snakebyte

So MO evidence is not needed?

In what century do you live the cutest?
There is no need to interpret the rules for counting down WWII targets as the know-how of our army. Now the whole world is quite transparent.

[Kerensky]

cruise missiles are equipped with self-liquidator, which is triggered in the event of an anti-aircraft missile,

What a fool you .... Self-liquidator should burn the necessary blocks, and not dudonin almost 7 meters and a diameter of 50 cm!

[boomerang.]

Shinshar facility in Homs. In the United States, it was said that it "probably" contained chemical weapons:

But there is poison gas and sarin if you bomb, then you will poison the Syrians more. Do bombardments of chemical warehouses protect people from poisoning? And if they bombed last year and no one was poisoned, then there are no chemical weapons, why else bomb, your instructors are there too. If you were sure that Syria had chemical weapons, you would not have been bombed, since the cloud does not know where it will go, it could poison your soldiers. So they bombed for another purpose.
Maybe they wanted to test their smart missiles, because last year, many did not reach the goal.
Ivanka wept again and asked Trump to bomb Syria.

[NordUral]

They bombed Russia and hit, which is doubly embarrassing! But ordinary Syrians, whose death, as it turned out, cost nothing to “our” rulers, good luck and the will to win! So these us, who are seated in the Kremlin and its environs, will surrender, choking on something. How long will we still come to our senses from liberal dreams?

[E_V_N]

Quote: NordUral

They bombed Russia and hit, which is doubly embarrassing!

Imagine, I even know where we got ... you probably got a lot of blows on your head this time, well, no luck, it happens.

[MadCat]

Quote: bumerang.

But there is poison gas and sarin if you bomb, then you will poison the Syrians more. Do bombardments of chemical warehouses protect people from poisoning?

in general, the components are mixed before use, the components themselves are stored separately. And the amount of explosives that the Americans dumped could burn anything.

[NordUral]

The submission stated that the goal of destroying the infrastructure that would enable the government of Syria to resume work on the creation of chemical weapons has been achieved.

And you don’t hesitate to admit that Assad does not have any chemical weapons.

And if the country had a real Supreme, then the answer to the impudent sally of the Anglo-Saxons would cool their impulse, discouraging a repeat.

[Orkraider]

Quote: victor50

And we will prove that we effectively defended the country that invited us, asking for help! It seems that shame and conscience have lost not only at the top!

Why prove it? The proof for people involved in the analysis is a comparison of the 2015 map and the map from the current date. The help provided is obvious. Point.
In the current situation, engaging in direct clashes, especially with superior forces and surrounded by "friends", is not reasonable.

[Kostadinov]

1. Intercepted something or not is not so important here. Deaf defense was defeated again and always will be. It will be very difficult to intercept an inconspicuous CR capable of maneuvering with sufficiently large overloads. If to this we add that of the larger number of missiles, always more and fewer of them will break through to the goal of the air defense / missile defense task becomes practically impracticable. You can only respond to a blow with a blow - it is confirmed again and again.
2. The calculation of this blow is driven by a wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran and Syria. The USA is demonstrating - look, if we don’t touch the Russians, they won’t protect you. In vain do you think in Russian you need to fulfill our conditions.
3. If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.

[E_V_N]

Quote: Kostadinov

1. Intercepted something or not is not so important here. Deaf defense was defeated again and always will be. It will be very difficult to intercept an inconspicuous CR capable of maneuvering with sufficiently large overloads. If to this we add that of the larger number of missiles, always more and fewer of them will break through to the goal of the air defense / missile defense task becomes practically impracticable. You can only respond to a blow with a blow - it is confirmed again and again.
2. The calculation of this blow is driven by a wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran and Syria. The USA is demonstrating - look, if we don’t touch the Russians, they won’t protect you. In vain do you think in Russian you need to fulfill our conditions.
3. If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.

1. Whether interception or not was exactly the opposite, it is very important. Two new strategies are being tested here: the “disarming first strike” from the United States and the “deaf defense followed by a guaranteed response” from Russia. If the truth gets lost 2% of the missiles, this means the failure of the US strategy, but 70% flew to the target becomes not very important.
2. This strike does not drive any wedge between Russia and Turkey, Iran, and Syria. Russia said that Assad will re-elect the people of Syria and he will not be mixed up by the US coalition, it happened. No one in the West is already shouting that Assad should be immediately mixed and destroyed. The coup in Turkey with the help of Russia also failed and Erdogan retained his post. Iran was not bombed by the United States, but with the help of Russia concluded a nuclear deal on favorable terms for itself and received the lifting of 30 summer sanctions. You do not see the forest beyond the trees. The United States is now trying to save face, to show that they are doing what they want (but they don’t shoot at the Russians, by the way), Assad did not overthrow and did not want to and are ready to withdraw troops from Syria
3. And a warning, hit get an answer on the rocket carriers is not that the answer? Notice the 100 missiles fired at 4 a.m. and not one dead, doesn't it look strange? And you can say anything, these are just words.

[Kerensky]

If Russia somehow does not respond to the blow, I think there will be the following more powerful blows. Evade does not work.

Come on! Can Syria have at least one rocket per ship ?!

[tlauicol]

Now, according to the First1, the Syrian asked the leaders why Russia does not protect them!? So Sheinin didn’t say a word more, shame

[Wilderness]

Shame, this is why the hosts did not ask this "Syrian": Why aren't you in the trenches yourself? I was bombarded with critical posts the other day, like: why not at the military enlistment office yet? But because there is no desire to die for the "hatskraynikov". Russia had oil, gas, metal, and now it seems that the main export commodities are soldiers, children, and sewers.

[tlauicol]

diplomat in the trenches?

[Wilderness]

A diplomat is not supposed to ask such garbage, he is an official (to transfer paper, accept paper, etc.). He asked as a citizen of the country. Imagine the next time he asks: Why didn’t the Russian Federation send us money, a lot of money? Didn’t give us a piece of your territory? ... No, I understand, they came there - you need to act, and not just stand aside ... but these quacks, that we still have something to do is a bust.

[konstantin68]

Ezekha,
I understand, you are a writer ... It's sad. Amen!

[boomerang.]

Quote: NordUral

And if the country had a real Supreme, then the answer to the impudent sally of the Anglo-Saxons would cool their impulse, discouraging a repeat.

Russia has a real Supreme, you don’t know why the missiles were only in the warehouse, and this is proof that there are no chemical weapons in that warehouse. Do you think that Russia could not repel the attack on this warehouse?
If the Supreme would attack those who bombed, now they would analyze the actions of Russia, and so take the actions of the United States and its aides. After all, it was they who attacked Syria and according to their belief that there was a chemical weapon in that warehouse, they actually attacked the Syrians, because if there were sarin or other chemical weapons, there would be huge sacrifices. Here we will see the further action of the whole world.
That is why the Russians chose Putin!

[Lynx33]

If we compare the satellite images of Syria 5 years ago with the current ones, then yes, the West did its best, wiped off the whole country, soon there will not be a whole building there. Such a fight against bandits hired by Western countries is not effective and victory within Syria is impossible in principle. It is time to learn from the enemy’s experience and launch this infection into their house, let them bomb themselves. Rather, it is not even necessary to run anyone, they let everyone in, they only have to set the wick on fire, let Europe burn.

[Bronevick]

If, according to them, chemical weapons were stored there, now chemical contamination of the area is now there. Is it better?

[G A_2]

]

Quote: Artemy

Quote: Snakebyte

Terrorists, then, can show such photos, but MO doesn’t succeed?

For MO, others do it

Old photos? Is it tomahawks? Look in google what kind of photo you posted
http://rahyabnews.com/fa/news/89194/

[tlauicol]

the man just showed how fast you can find rockets ... if you look.
our MO has been looking for more than a year, and the peasants in minutes find

[sdc_alex]

Who told you that someone is looking for them? You need it and you are looking for it. What is it for our MO? What would be measured organs?
We need to post a few photos on Twitter and instu, and do the thing, which the RF Ministry of Defense does. They repelled the air attack - repelled, there were no victims - no, there was no irreparable damage - no, then the job was done. And let the forum posts post tweaks and tweets.

[tlauicol]

Thank you for enlightening. they just don’t want to, I understand. Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets? Okay, I’ll take the word of MO, even though they’ve been lying recently

[sdc_alex]

Quote: Tlauicol

Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets?

How is this interconnected? if no debris is found, then the SAM will self-destruct ??????
you are talking nonsense.
fotochki shot down missiles are needed only for trolls ... and even then they won’t believe .. why throw beads in front of pigs?

Quote: Tlauicol

just don't want to understand

Well, at least something you understand? already happy.

[Cynic]

Quote: Tlauicol

It’s probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems,

Or it may turn out that you are right.
I remember this at the training grounds, though it’s not rockets, but you won’t find you are tormented to unsubscribe ...

[Snakebyte]

Quote: Tlauicol

Thank you for enlightening. they just don’t want to, I understand. Probably much more interesting to collect the wreckage of air defense systems than downed targets? Okay, I’ll take the word of MO, even though they’ve been lying recently

By the way, in this photo - R-40, apparently Syrian.

[Snakebyte]

I am aware that these are the fallen Caliber, which the terrorists (apparently using special search camels) found in a few hours.
In contrast to the "downed tomahawks", which "it makes no sense to look."
And it makes no sense to search, because there is nothing to search. As today, at first they boasted that they shot down 9 missiles over Shayrat, then they admitted that it was a false alarm. So on the 14th, shot down missiles fled.

[Archivist Vasya]

The S-200, in principle, could not intercept the axes that fly 50 meters, how and what the Syrians shot down there remains to be guessed. And the fact that ours this time too - "a hut from the edge, I don’t know anything" stayed up without firing a single missile - a disgrace
What was so difficult to shoot down several missiles that flew close to our military ??? Just in case, well, at the same time, to show that we are there and the equipment is not inflatable and quite working. But no, they got scared.
Someone says that they didn’t shoot down because they didn’t have to spend ammunition in case they were already going to hit ours ... damn it, why then there are so few missiles we have there ??? The mess.
Well, and another version that is more convincing - an agreement with the Americans. As it turns out - they gave our ally to the enemies to be beaten, and in return we will not have anything. Naturally, therefore, we do not have allies.

[sdc_alex]

Quote: Archivist Vasya

What was so difficult to shoot down several missiles that flew close to our military ???

The Defense Ministry made it clear at the briefing - "NATO missiles did not enter the Russian air defense zone."

The fact that they are there is already clear.

Quote: Archivist Vasya

As it turns out - they gave our ally to the enemies to be beaten, and in return we will not have anything.

They didn’t give it away, but covered it with air defense systems.

And why are you calling for war ??? Do you need it ???
Our Moscow Region chose the Solomon’s decision, they didn’t get into a big fight, they didn’t give in to the provocation, and they covered their ally. If ours shot down amers, who incidentally did not attack us, then this would be an act of aggression on our part. And so on behalf of the Syrians and under their flag ... providing technical support and specialists is a competent decision.

[Archivist Vasya]

The capabilities of the Syrians in the sense of air defense are very limited, what is the difficulty in providing them with modern systems for greater effectiveness? Again, check them out of the training environment, take into account the shortcomings. Shoot down rockets, not carriers, I'm just talking about that.

[sdc_alex]

I don’t know about you, but I weakly believe that the 70 with more than one missile shot down precisely the Syrian systems, under the control of Syrian experts.
At a minimum, target designation, tracking, coordination of actions and the supply of ammunition were carried out by our ...
And most likely some of our air defense systems worked (for example, Shell), therefore no casualties, there is no big destruction, etc. etc.

[Voenoboz]

If these pictures are true, then the accuracy of the hit is excellent. Perhaps they worked out guidance and positioning systems. It is impossible for an adversary to underestimate this, it can have a bad effect.

[1536]

Only a madman could bomb chemical weapons laboratories.
Only a complete scoundrel or fascist could bomb targets in a foreign country, knowing that there were no chemical weapons there.

[Cynic]

purely rhetorically
https://www.5-tv.ru/news/196942/?utm_referrer=htt
ps% 3A% 2F% 2Fzen.yandex.com