Military Review

Satanic dance of lies and "Tomahawks"

35
What is more dangerous: a lie or weapon? Of course, the weapon: it kills really. Of course, a lie: it can kill more people. Both are equally dangerous, and a lie is also a weapon. All three answers will be correct.


In the attack of the United States, Britain and France against Syria, concentrated lies and cruise missiles acted together, demonstrating their satanic dance. Yes, it can be said that he did not cause significant damage to the Syrian army. Yes, Syria succeeded in minimizing human losses with the help of old, still Soviet air defense systems (three or six wounded civilians were mentioned in different sources). But a lie ... An incredible lie, which, according to the teachings of Dr. Goebbels, the more monstrous, the easier it will be believed in ... She continues her “dance” after “Tomahawks” have finished. And it can lead to even more terrible consequences.



You can joke and mock the aggressors who bombed the old Research Center in the Barzah quarter of Damascus. This Center had previously bombed Israel, and perhaps it was then abandoned. One can rejoice at the fact that, according to the General Staff of Russia, most of the “smart” and “good” tramp rockets were shot down by old weapons that are armed with the Syrian army. You can put forward various theories about the "contract", etc.

But most importantly, the act of aggression from this does not cease to be a war crime deserving the strongest condemnation. Moreover, the perpetrators of this aggression, according to all conceivable and inconceivable laws, should have been punished. But there are no mechanisms for this in the current world system. Therefore, they are not in prison, but on the air. And for a long time they will lie to all of us about what is happening in Syria and about their “noble” mission, which is supposedly aimed at protecting civilians.

And if you imagine that the chemical weapons that Washington, London, Paris, and their “little mongrels” talked about, really were in the buildings that were bombed? Yes, at least - in the same research center in Barz? Around the object is a densely populated area. If there were poisonous substances there, then the crime of the aggressors would have been much larger - they would have poisoned the entire quarter. And this is the protection of civilians? As a result, the residents of the area were saved only by the fact that there were no chemical weapons there.

Unfortunately, the most important result of what happened is the very fact that a lie triumphed, which led to an act of violence against a sovereign state. The precedent is not the first: earlier on a thick lie were attacked attacks on Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya. But in the Syrian war, the predators made a very important step: they moved from threats and blackmail to real criminal actions.

"Overton's Window" in action. At first, Washington, along with the so-called antiterrorist coalition, argued that the invasion of Syria was not directed against its army and leadership (despite the fact that the United States had come out from the very beginning of the conflict). Allegedly, this is exclusively a struggle against ISIS (a terrorist organization banned in Russia). Under this cover, the forces of the “coalition” destroyed the infrastructure of Syria, built their base in Al-Tanfah and training camps for the “moderate opposition” and did other dark deeds. With one hand they “fought” against ISIS, with the other they rescued its militants from seemingly inevitable influence. But all this was going on under the guise of "fighting terrorism", and the "coalition" did not enter into a direct clash with the Syrian army for the time being.

Then, more and more, news began to arrive that the United States and its allies were already striking the SAR army. First, supposedly by chance, then - no longer by chance, but for the sake of mythical self-defense. At the same time, the statements of the American side followed that it still does not want a direct clash with the army of the country where the coalition forces so unceremoniously broke into.

Last year, a provocation with chemical weapons led to a criminal attack by the United States on the airfield of the Syrian army "Shairat". One more step to what is happening now, one more bite of a predator, which tastes the prey and looks around - is there anyone who can stop it?

Now it has come to the point that Washington believes that it is “doing justice” (as US permanent representative Nikki Haley said at a meeting of the UN Security Council). This "struggle for justice" means that now the White House and the Pentagon have assumed the right to bomb anything in Syria. And such a blow took place at four in the morning of April 14.

Each time, not only the power and scale of the attack increases, but also the enormity of the lies, and the brazenness of anti-Syrian statements. What will we see next time when somewhere in the office of the White House or the Pentagon (or maybe the Elysian Palace) they decide that somewhere in Syria the mythical chemical weapon was used again? Carpet bombing of Damascus, Aleppo and other cities? Attacks against Russian military facilities?

And the ground for new attacks (which may become even more aggressive and bloody) is already being prepared. She generously fertilized with lies. Moreover, the lie, which place - at the dump stories. Nothing new, except lies about the Syrian chemical weapons, even the criminals cannot invent. Or do not want. Why, if this lie works?

The aggressor expands the geography of its actions. Sanctions because of Syria threaten Russia already. At the same time, Trump is trying to weaken Iran, even withdraw from the nuclear weapons deal with this country and thus impose further sanctions on this country. The reasons for this new round of hostility towards Iran are not directly announced, but one of them may be the fact that Iran is an ally of Syria. Here we can expect further expansion: any country that has dared to express its solidarity with Damascus and Moscow is in danger. For example, there may be slogans about the need to “democratize” Bolivia, which behaves quite boldly in the UN Security Council (this country, together with China, supported Russia's desire to condemn the aggression against Syria, when Kazakhstan, one of Russia's closest partners, refused to do so ). Well and, of course, the anti-Chinese steps can also be taken by Washington, including to retaliate for this position in the UN Security Council.

Unfortunately, the lack of condemnation of aggression by the UN Security Council, impunity of violators of international law and the UN Charter is preparing the basis for new satanic attacks, and not only against Syria. And the number of victims of these attacks can be much larger - they will be written off as collateral victims while “defending democracy”.
Author:
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Snakebyte
    Snakebyte April 18 2018 15: 05
    +2
    That damned West made Russia block the proposal to investigate the incident at the UN.
    Of course, only in order to “Tomahawks” to shoot.
    1. elenagromova
      April 18 2018 15: 21
      +5
      Russia offered its own version of the investigation, which was rejected. Yes, sometimes you have to fight with the West for every comma. Such a situation was created - any omission in the resolution is interpreted in such a way that real Tomahawks are flying. Recall Libya
    2. passing
      passing April 18 2018 20: 47
      +5
      Here the damned West made Russia block the proposal to investigate the incident at the UN

      Careful attention must be paid to information!
      The resolution of the West stated that Syria used chemical weapons and this fact needs to be investigated. Russia proposed to establish the existence of an event of the use of chemical weapons, and if such a fact is established, then who should investigate.
      Do you see the difference?
      1. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte April 18 2018 22: 29
        +1
        But how to establish the presence of an event without investigation?
        Even sending a dog to smell chemistry is already called investigative action.
        1. passing
          passing April 19 2018 07: 40
          +2
          But how to establish the presence of an event without investigation?

          But why acknowledge the fact of a chemical attack, i.e. an event, without investigation.
          Initially admit Assad's guilt?
          1. Snakebyte
            Snakebyte April 19 2018 09: 22
            0
            Quote: passing
            But why acknowledge the fact of a chemical attack, i.e. an event, without investigation.

            And why deny the fact of using chemistry without investigation?
            And after a couple of days, a chemical laboratory was found ... so did chemistry still exist?
            https://govoritmoskva.ru/news/157493/
            Everything repeats like a year ago.
            At first, the fact of the attack was denied, then they talked about staging, then they blamed the terrorists. And they didn’t let me investigate either.
            1. passing
              passing April 19 2018 11: 24
              +2
              And why deny the fact of using chemistry without investigation?

              Let's go the other way winked You are accused of murder lol suppose!
              You agree, go ahead and prove. They lock you up for two months, start poking around in “your dirty laundry”, after a month they don’t prove the murder, but they either find a bunch that are not related to the criminal code of actions, for example, that you have two lovers. Yes, you are not a murderer, but what a villain was deceiving a family, children. It means that he did not admit in vain, he simply did not prove it. Like that.
              And in the international arena where there is no need for evidence, only the adoption of the resolution will be accepted as an undeniable fact of the use of chemical weapons hi
              1. Snakebyte
                Snakebyte April 19 2018 13: 11
                0
                Quote: passing
                And in the international arena where there is no need for evidence, only the adoption of the resolution will be accepted as an undeniable fact of the use of chemical weapons

                Even so.
                If Russia immediately recognizes the fact of the use of chemistry, condemns it, agrees to an investigation, provides assistance. An investigation will reveal that Assad is a villain and has applied chemistry. Americans strike. But Russia has nothing to blame.
                If Russia does not recognize the fact of the use of chemistry, does not agree to an investigation, provides assistance, then the Americans strike and accuse Assad of using chemistry. The fact of the use of chemistry still pops up later. And Russia is accused of supporting inhuman methods of war. This is followed by international condemnation and new sanctions, etc.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 18 2018 15: 17
    +7
    What are the results of the strike? Assad remained in power, the offensive is proceeding normally. Mattresses gave us the opportunity to strengthen Syria's air defense. All strategically important objects are unharmed.
    So what is it about? A bunch in Trump's empty basin? Is it worth talking about this gas evolution at all?
    1. NF68
      NF68 April 18 2018 16: 00
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      What are the results of the strike? Assad remained in power, the offensive is proceeding normally. Mattresses gave us the opportunity to strengthen Syria's air defense. All strategically important objects are unharmed.


      Most likely, Trump, May and Macron “played” primarily on their internal audience.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 18 2018 16: 02
        +2
        Quote: NF68
        Most likely, Trump, May and Macron “played” primarily on their internal audience.

        But what about the cries, Assad must go?
        1. NF68
          NF68 April 18 2018 16: 40
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: NF68
          Most likely, Trump, May and Macron “played” primarily on their internal audience.

          But what about the cries, Assad must go?


          Also a game to the public. Although now the hopes of this are minimal. But you can make a fuss about making such statements.
    2. NIKNN
      NIKNN April 18 2018 16: 50
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      What are the results of the strike? Assad remained in power, the offensive is proceeding normally. Mattresses gave us the opportunity to strengthen Syria's air defense. All strategically important objects are unharmed.
      So what is it about? A bunch in Trump's empty basin? Is it worth talking about this gas evolution at all?

      As if everything is so, as well as the fact that arrogance has already crossed all borders. You can interpret all this from different points of view, but the fact of intimidation is not Assad or even Russia, but world mongrels on your face. Well, Naglia and S. France took part in this circus, but they don’t understand what they were intimidating and forced to shell out for NATO, and depriving them of any opinion whatsoever about themselves? The message is simple, if not with us then who will protect you like this? Merkel someone smarter suggested the real goals of this plan ... that to go on dutifully behind the states is the way to the slaughter ... Well, what else to add, I don’t know, but for me it’s a message to everyone, and Assad is a tool .. The target through which the seriousness of the message must be conveyed ...
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 18 2018 16: 55
        +3
        Quote: NIKNN
        it is necessary to convey the seriousness of the promise ...

        Our MESSAGE was much more serious, namely, Go to a distant pornographic, with elements of BDSM, travel, forest, field, gully ...
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN April 18 2018 16: 58
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: NIKNN
          it is necessary to convey the seriousness of the promise ...

          Our MESSAGE was much more serious, namely, Go to a distant pornographic, with elements of BDSM, travel, forest, field, gully ...

          So I say that the message is not so much to us, and Assad is also not so much worse than the past ...
      2. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets April 18 2018 20: 40
        +1
        Quote: NIKNN
        As if everything is so, as well as the fact that arrogance has already crossed all borders.

        Insolence has crossed these boundaries a long time ago, it’s just that everything’s becoming stupid and clumsy now, next time there will be no references to pseudo-chemical weapons, the justifications will be simple: “I want to bomb” or “I just don’t like him”. yes
  3. BAI
    BAI April 18 2018 16: 40
    +1
    And if you imagine that the chemical weapons that Washington, London, Paris and their "little mongrel" talked about were actually in the buildings that bombed? Yes, at least - in the same research center in Barz? Around the facility is a densely populated area. If there were poisonous substances, then the crime of the aggressors would be much more widespread - they would poison the entire quarter. And this is the protection of civilians? And as a result, the residents of the district were saved only by the fact that no chemical weapons were there.

    So this is the most important thing, which is what the Foreign Ministry needs to talk about constantly - there were no chemical weapons. They bombed everything (the United States themselves confirm), but no one was poisoned.
  4. turbris
    turbris April 18 2018 17: 10
    +1
    “Unfortunately, the lack of condemnation of aggression by the UN Security Council, the impunity of violators of international law and the UN Charter is preparing the basis for new satanic attacks, and not only against Syria. And the number of victims of these attacks can be much larger - they will be attributed to collateral victims in the“ defense of democracy ” Yes, this is the unipolar world under the rule of the hegemon, no international organizations and laws are in force. The hegemon decided and "justice" prevailed. It is very dangerous, and as long as the countries supporting the hegemon do not understand this, the world will remain very fragile. While Russia is almost single-handedly fighting to comply with the hegemonic decisions of the UN organization and international laws, but this is beneficial to the entire international community, it remains to be hoped that at least the countries in the top 20 understand this.
    1. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov April 18 2018 19: 07
      +3
      Theatrical performance is in force! And the other debaters all think that Russia is fighting for Syria. but in fact, the Russian government is fighting for the oligarchs of Russia in Syria. No sacred meaning, just chewing gum for idiots and propagandists.
      1. turbris
        turbris April 18 2018 20: 29
        +2
        Your statements about the oligarchs and comprador power, this is just chewing gum for idiots and propagandists, as you put it. They do not affect anything, so one shaking of the air in the hope of originality, but can you say something on the merits of the topic?
        1. andrej-shironov
          andrej-shironov April 19 2018 08: 45
          0
          smile Hoping for originality? laughing Turbris, I beg you! Water sharpens a stone. wink
  5. NordUral
    NordUral April 18 2018 18: 56
    +4
    No need to spend so many words on all this. The actions of the West in Syria (I take only this country) are aggression. The actions of Russia in Syria are determined by the agreement of Syria and Russia, while being absolutely legitimate.
    The USA is the leader of the organized crime group, whose active members are England, France, and the rest of the NATO members in a passive form.
    And it is time for Moscow to say this toughly, without any partners there, in quotation marks and without quotation marks.
  6. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov April 18 2018 19: 02
    +2
    Elena! Your lies are much more dangerous and the lies of the State Department and the Kremlin! Please, less stupidity and pathetics! NOBODY ALREADY BELIEVE IN THIS!
    1. elenagromova
      April 18 2018 19: 16
      +5
      First of all, there is nothing to speak for everyone. Secondly, be able to answer for their words. Where is the lie? In what? What staged a provocation and hit? Thirdly, even if there is some kind of “false” as you say, it does not lead to war. But the lie of the State Department leads. There is a difference? Or just to blurt out something?
    2. turbris
      turbris April 18 2018 20: 33
      +2
      Who is THERE NO ONE BELIEVES IN THIS? You once again look at the results of the presidential election or have already become completely blind, but what about the 65 million voters? This is only a handful of people like you who do not believe in anything!
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid April 20 2018 04: 49
        +2
        An information war is constantly waged with Russia. It is more correct to say a hybrid war, and an information war is part of it. And we must also talk about it constantly. What would nobody wear pink glasses. Thanks for the article, Elena.
  7. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara April 18 2018 22: 02
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    What are the results of the strike? Assad remained in power, the offensive is proceeding normally. Mattresses gave us the opportunity to strengthen Syria's air defense. All strategically important objects are unharmed.
    So what is it about? A bunch in Trump's empty basin? Is it worth talking about this gas evolution at all?

    And what prevented us from strengthening in Syria before the incident? Attempts to find advantages where they do not exist ...
    1. turbris
      turbris April 19 2018 09: 08
      +1
      But you are looking for cons, not knowing the real situation.
  8. Alex sheichenko
    Alex sheichenko April 18 2018 22: 32
    +3
    In fact, the situation looks like this, you are standing at the bus stop and waiting for the bus. A certain Karken comes up and and I say piss here, you tell him that if you piss me off, then he will fly to you. The kraken begins to piss past your feet. He pisses around your legs and walks away.
    1. G A_2
      G A_2 April 21 2018 12: 44
      +1
      Quote: Alex Sheichenko
      In fact, the situation looks like this, you are standing at the bus stop and waiting for the bus. A certain Karken comes up and and I say piss here, you tell him that if you piss me off, then he will fly to you. The kraken begins to piss past your feet. He pisses around your legs and walks away.

      Not this way. Kraken says I will piss your friend but you will not be hurt. Deal? Deal. Scoops a friend and leaves.
  9. Amurets
    Amurets April 19 2018 01: 26
    +3
    Kazakhstan, one of Russia's closest partners, refused to do so

    Thanks Lena for the article. And I cited a quote about Kazakhstan not in vain. Nazarbayev did not knowingly go to bow to Trump. Kazakhstan assets frozen in the USA. "A representative of a Moldovan businessman said that a Belgian court decided to freeze the savings portfolio of the National Fund of Kazakhstan (Bank of New York Mellon is an international custodian) totaling approximately $ 22 billion, including US treasury bills of about $ 11 billion and cash in the amount of $ 589 million. "
    As Winans explained, the court of Amsterdam (Netherlands) made the same decision as in Belgium.
    https://forbes.kz/process/probing/pochemu_zamoroj
    enyi_aktivyi_natsfonda_kazahstana
    Kazakhstan’s assets were unfrozen, but a lesson for Kazakhstan went to good. https://www.lsm.kz/sredstva-nacfonda-razmorozili
    Directly with the Russian Federation, this does not seem to be connected, but you look at the proposals for the latest sanctions against the Russian Federation. Here is IMHO, why Kazakhstan did not support the Russian Federation
    1. Camry30
      Camry30 10 June 2018 01: 12
      0
      Kazakhstan is the venue for the Astana Process. The adoption of one of the parties would put an end to the negotiation processes and the opposition would no longer go to a neutral country.
      Although to whom I explain, the slogans “Kazakhs betrayed us, sold to the USA” have already paid to the trolls repeat
  10. Dr. Hub
    Dr. Hub April 19 2018 11: 23
    +2
    That’s what I can’t understand, it’s the indignation of compatriots. Yes, calm down you already about the lie. Is it really not clear that a war is being waged on us at which all means are good. And no one promised us knightly fights. The only goal is to bring us down. Therefore, it’s time to get used to the meanness of the West and, if possible, answer the same, only beautifully and not as clumsy as they are. Although, as you know, maybe we answer))
  11. sleeve
    sleeve April 19 2018 12: 53
    0
    Oh coming, I foresee the reformatting of the world order. It will remain like the SB platform and that's it. The formation of a parallel financial system (at least on the basis of the yuan) will end and the global platform will fall apart into two large and smaller ones. And the kayuk will come to the “sea of ​​lies”. It will become an individual toy for internal use (oh, how ambiguous something).
  12. shinobi
    shinobi April 19 2018 13: 57
    +2
    The UN repeats the fate of the League of Nations. Another big war, a matter of time. As soon as the United States believes that they can break through our anti-aircraft defense, it will begin. Most likely it will be in the manner of the "Crimean wars" of the century before last.