Military Review

Moscow is right! In China, support and study the actions of Russia in Syria

52
In the complex political situation of the modern world, China is trying to maintain external calm and remoteness from the sides of conflicts. This is quite in the Chinese tradition - the "middle" path, neutrality, calm. But such “political Taoism” of the Chinese leadership is only an external image. In fact, Beijing is very closely monitoring the turbulent political events in Europe and the Middle East, including the armed conflicts in Ukraine and Syria. Of particular interest in China are the actions of Russia in the Syrian conflict. China, despite its vast capabilities, did not intervene in the civil war in Syria. But this does not mean that the Chinese leadership does not show interest in how Russian or American forces operate in Syria.


As the largest country in the world and a key competitor to the United States, China, of course, cannot remain aloof from the events in the Middle East. But Beijing diligently demonstrates political neutrality and distances itself from the parties to the conflict. True, the whole world understands that the sympathies of the Chinese leadership are on the side of Bashar al-Assad. In Beijing, they carefully observe the actions of Russia in Syria, and in Washington - the reaction of Beijing.

Moscow is right! In China, support and study the actions of Russia in Syria


Professor of the US Naval College Lyle Goldstein pays great attention to the study of China’s reaction to Russian actions in Syria. According to Goldstein, the analysis of the Chinese attitude to the Syrian conflict is very significant - China claims the role of a great power, and neutrality in the Syrian conflict does not mean that Chinese policy cannot influence the future course of events. Goldstein also draws attention to China’s growing interest in Russian actions in Syria.

In 2017, the Academy of Social Sciences of the PRC even published a special study on the armed conflict in Syria and the analysis of actions and positions of Russia. This interest is quite applied in nature and is explained, among other things, by the desire to borrow best practices that may be useful to China itself. It is known that China itself has problems in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XUAR, former East Turkestan), associated with the activation of the Uyghur national movement. Many Uighur militants are fighting in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan in the ranks of radical groups, terrorist acts have already taken place on Chinese soil, which makes it necessary to take into account foreign experience in the fight against terrorists.

China is very interested in Russian participation in the Syrian conflict both from a military and political point of view. Researchers highlight several key findings of the Russian Syrian campaign. Firstly, this is the almost complete destruction of the Islamic State (banned in the Russian Federation), which resulted from the active actions of the Russian aviation, special forces and government forces of Syria. The largest terrorist group that has been terrifying the Middle East for years has been virtually destroyed in Syria. For China, this is an invaluable experience in eliminating a terrorist organization outside the country. Considering that militants from the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of the PRC are fighting against Assad in Syria, we can say that Russia partially eases the task of China to destroy them.

Secondly, the Russian participation in the hostilities in Syria led to large-scale changes in world politics. Russia was able to take the initiative in its confrontation with the West, which led to a violent reaction from the US and NATO. Washington and Brussels are responding to Russia with new and new sanctions, but Moscow has in fact broken up American plans to overthrow Assad. For the US, this is a colossal fiasco of military-political plans, probably the first since the wars in Indochina, since both the Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi, and Slobodan Milosevic were able to be overthrown by the Americans quickly. In Syria, the civil war has been going on for more than 6 years, and it is not possible to defeat the Assad government forces — and the main reason for this is Russia's active position. Moscow views operations in Syria as a preventive defense of Russian interests in the southern direction and does not allow NATO to gain control over Syria.



China’s great interest was also caused by the fact that Russia decided on a military operation in Syria under difficult economic conditions. The West imposed economic sanctions against Russia, currency inflation occurred in the country, incomes and purchasing power of the population decreased, but all these circumstances did not become an obstacle to active participation in the Syrian conflict. Moreover, the fight against terrorism in Syria, as noted by Chinese researchers, has become one of the important ways to rally and mobilize the Russian nation. Contrary to expectations, the rating of the Russian president has grown to the maximum, and even those political forces that have traditionally been in opposition have rallied around the authorities. Thus, participation in the Syrian conflict influenced the internal political situation in the Russian Federation, and moreover, rather in a positive direction.

Special attention is paid by Chinese analysts to the informational aspect of the confrontation between Russia and the West, which has acquired particular importance in the context of the Syrian conflict. The United States and NATO use all the possibilities of their informational arsenal to discredit Russia, but these efforts turn out to be practically meaningless. Inside the country, a rare unanimity in support of foreign policy is demonstrated. Putin can be criticized for some economic problems, but not for confrontation with the West. Anti-Western sentiment has always been characteristic of Russian society, and the Syrian campaign has only strengthened it. Even many critics and opponents of Putin were forced to admit that the president is implementing a foreign policy course that cannot but cause approval in Russian society.

On the foreign policy front, only the EU countries and the US satellites support the anti-Russian campaign. This testifies to the actual failure of the information war unleashed by the West. Moreover, thanks to the Syrian conflict, Russia is finding new, sometimes the most unexpected partners. A typical example is Turkey, which historically was, if not an enemy, then an opponent of Russia.

For a long time, Turkey remained the most important outpost of American influence in Western Asia. Now the situation has changed. The Syrian conflict led to the most serious contradictions in the NATO bloc. Undisguised by Washington support for Kurdish rebels in Syria and the government of Iraqi Kurdistan annoys Ankara very much. For the Turkish authorities, the desire to suppress the Kurdish national liberation movement plays a very large role, it is more important than any allied obligations under NATO.

The relations between Ankara and Washington, Ankara and Brussels are very tense now. Recep Erdogan understands perfectly well that in the West he is hated, but he is trying to play his game and in this game he is forcedly blocked with Russia. The heads and representatives of Russia, Turkey and Iran meet to discuss the situation in Syria independently, thereby emphasizing that their countries have a special relationship to Syrian politics and more reason to participate in it than the United States or Western Europe.



The Syrian conflict has strengthened Russia's cooperation with Iran, which, more than ever, has been interested in support from Moscow. Relations with many Arab countries have improved. Interestingly, representatives of the oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf, including both Saudi Arabia and its main opponent, Qatar, have also come to Russia frequently. Egypt also has very smooth and friendly relations. Thus, the Syrian conflict has led to the strengthening of Russia's position in the international arena, since the world is not limited to the countries of the European Union or the United States of America. In Asia, Africa, Latin America, and many European countries, the position and policy of Russia meets, if not complete approval, then at least understanding.

According to Chinese researchers, Russian intervention in the fighting in Syria has led to positive consequences for Europe, which now supports the US anti-Russian sanctions. After all, political stabilization in the Middle East, in which Russia is interested, contributes to reducing the number of refugees and migrants resettling in the countries of Western Europe. That is, the European Union should thank Russia for the antiterrorist operation in Syria, and not create additional obstacles for it.

Russia has done a lot to ensure that the operation in Syria does not become a “new Afghanistan”. The Russian society was very afraid of this, but the country's leadership made the right decision - in Syria, professionals are fighting, receiving a decent reward and consciously making the decision to go to war. Thus, the Russian army receives specialists with a “running in”, who have experience of real combat operations, and under unusual conditions for Russia.

A separate aspect is the application of new methods of warfare, new weapons. Unmanned aerial vehicles, electronic intelligence equipment are actively used in Syria to minimize losses among Russian troops and cause maximum damage to terrorist groups. Given that Russian troops have been in Syria for years, it is possible to note the high combat effectiveness and the losses that are quite modest for difficult conditions.

The American researcher Goldstein, analyzing the Chinese report, of course, criticizes him from the political standpoint of Washington, noting that Chinese scientists are too positive about the actions of Russia in Syria and in the world as a whole. According to the American researcher, China, building up its political ambitions, is interested in Russia's experience precisely because it is going to itself begin to take active steps outside the Middle Kingdom. In this regard, Beijing is very interested in understanding the experience of neighboring Russia.

Indeed, in recent times, China has been showing an increasing interest in expanding its own presence in the most diverse regions of the world. For example, China opened a naval base in Djibouti, a small country in Northeast Africa. Djibouti has long been providing its territory for military and naval bases of other states. But if the French and Americans used the lands of Djibouti before, now it’s the turn of the Chinese.



Ensuring the uninterrupted supply of cheap oil and gas is of great importance for China. For this, Beijing seeks to expand control over the situation in the Middle East. The base in Djibouti, the port in Pakistan’s Gwadar is only the tip of the iceberg of the PRC’s foreign policy. Although China does not send its troops to Syria yet, it is very interested in ousting the Americans from this country and reducing the American military and political presence in the Middle East. For China, the destruction of religious extremism in the Middle East is of decisive importance, since in this way China will protect itself against the terrorist attacks that have already taken place on Chinese territory. To deprive the support of terrorists who are trying to penetrate Chinese Xinjiang, sooner or later, Beijing will have to use force outside of the Middle Kingdom. In order for the use of force to be successful, in China and study the Russian experience of hostilities in Syria.

It is noteworthy that the American researcher, analyzing the Chinese interest in the Syrian campaign, makes a “brilliant” conclusion - allegedly fighting outside the country, in remote areas, can lead China to numerous risks. For some reason, a tendentious professor from a naval college does not see such a future for the USA, Britain or France, it turns out that the use of American, British or French troops in Syria and Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, Mali and Somalia is reprehensible. That is, we are faced with a typical example of a Western ideological model - what is allowed to Washington or London is not allowed to Moscow or Beijing. But in the modern world that has ceased to be unipolar, such a model suffers a complete defeat. And one of the evidences of this defeat is the successful military campaign of Russia in Syria, to which the Chinese have rightly paid attention.

It is time for Pentagon theorists to become accustomed to the changes and realize that China and Russia will no longer listen to the hypocritical advice of the American and British "partners" frantically clinging to the remnants of the system that was formed in the era of colonialism.
Author:
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 11 2018 05: 37
    +1
    Neutrality and sitting back in the direction of China and other countries can lead to the collapse of the earth.
    1. kipod
      kipod April 11 2018 05: 45
      0
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Neutrality and sitting back in the direction of China and other countries can lead to the collapse of the earth.

      China, as always, calmly sit aside.
      The Chinese are smart.
      1. Cxnumx
        Cxnumx April 11 2018 05: 54
        +1
        Quote: kipod
        China, as always, calmly sit aside. The Chinese are smart.

        therefore, they are well aware that they cannot compete alone with the West.
        1. kipod
          kipod April 11 2018 09: 10
          +4
          Quote: K0
          Quote: kipod
          China, as always, calmly sit aside. The Chinese are smart.

          therefore, they are well aware that they cannot compete alone with the West.

          Well, the haberdasher and cardinal are power. we heard.
          if you want to compete with the West - this is your right.
          China then what the hell is that for?
          All his gestures and statements make it clear that he is against all kinds of confrontation.
          so of course you can, in order to calm your soul, pull an owl on a globe and say - China with us into fire and into water - only this is absolutely untrue.
          1. Cxnumx
            Cxnumx April 11 2018 13: 12
            +4
            Quote: kipod
            All his gestures and statements make it clear that he is against all kinds of confrontation.

            obviously you live on a different planet where China does not impose duties on American goods, supports their resolutions at the UN, does not build military bases on disputed islands, does not openly declare an alliance with Russia ... drop by us more often hi
            1. Swag
              Swag April 11 2018 18: 22
              0
              take care of beads colleague.
            2. aiden
              aiden April 11 2018 19: 13
              +1
              He lives in the promised land
      2. Same lech
        Same lech April 11 2018 06: 00
        +8
        The Chinese are smart.

        Not smart but cunning ... smile would be smart would not steal technology around the world.
        Only the Jews are more cunning than the Chinese ...
        1. Hoc vince
          Hoc vince April 11 2018 06: 21
          +4
          There was a lot of crazy news yesterday:
          "The first place on this list is the news that the leadership of the People’s Republic of China transferred its fleet command to the leadership of the Russian Ministry of Defense."
          1. Wolka
            Wolka April 11 2018 06: 54
            0
            this is where such a desa ...
            1. Hoc vince
              Hoc vince April 11 2018 08: 58
              0
              The Americans began to celebrate the victory early and blew up the destroyer Donald Cook - the top fake news about the upcoming war in Syria

              https://tsargrad.tv/news/amerikancy-rano-nachali-
              prazdnovat-pobedu-i-vzorvali-jesminec-donald-kuk-
              top-samyh-fejk-novostej-o-predstojashhej-vojne-v-
              sirii_12454
        2. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I April 11 2018 07: 29
          +3
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          Only the Jews are more cunning than the Chinese ...

          I do not agree! Just a little again, the Jews! What are the Jews? After all, they are completely understandable to the Russians! As the Russians understand "gopnik"! Well, the Arabs looked "sideways" towards Israel ... said something "not so" about the Jewish mother .... and u! The Israelis stuffed their faces to the Arabs and took away the "purse and watch" ... that is, tanks, guns, rocket launchers .... in general ... everything that was! But do the Chinese do this? N-e-ah! It's like in a famous parable about the exchange of goods and ideas ... Remember? If the two sides exchanged "apples" ... then what? And if the two sides exchanged ideas ... then chago? That’s the point: the Jews took away the tanks from the Arabs ... the Arabs didn’t have any more ... The Chinese stole the idea from the 3's "sides .... each of the 3's" sides, as it was and the idea remained .... but the Chinese had nothing, but there were 3 ideas ... So how can the Chinese be compared with the Jews? The Chinese are trickier!
          1. Same lech
            Same lech April 11 2018 07: 31
            +1
            So how can the Chinese be compared with the Jews? The Chinese are trickier!


            Okay ... smile so be it.
            1. novel66
              novel66 April 11 2018 11: 39
              +1
              more cunning than all the descendants of the Sumerians
        3. kipod
          kipod April 11 2018 09: 10
          +1
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          e smart and cunning ... would be smart would not steal technology around the world.

          as I understand it, the USSR and Russia never stole anything.
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          Only the Jews are more cunning than the Chinese ..

          If you are so smart, why are you so poor? laughing
          1. andj61
            andj61 April 11 2018 10: 51
            0
            Quote: kipod
            as I understand the USSR and Russia have never stolen anything.

            Why didn’t steal - they stole, of course. Only now Western countries have stolen an order of magnitude more, moreover, and more commercially more successfully. And now we have copyright rules that are even more stringent than in the West. By the way, mitigation to a minimum - for example, to the level of China - of these norms can be an extremely worthy and painful response to recent US sanctions! bully hi
            1. kipod
              kipod April 11 2018 10: 56
              +1
              Quote: andj61
              Why didn’t steal - they stole, of course. Only Western countries stole an order of magnitude more

              wonderful excuse. is the same in court?
              Quote: andj61
              and more commercially successful

              Can I have an example?
              Quote: andj61
              And now we have even better compliance with copyright laws than in the West

              okay, i.e. aren't stealing now?
              Quote: andj61
              . By the way, mitigation to a minimum - for example, to the level of China - of these norms can be an extremely worthy and painful response to recent US sanctions

              One of the requirements for China (trump) was copyright compliance and China caved in.
              1. andj61
                andj61 April 11 2018 11: 24
                +1
                Quote: kipod
                Quote: andj61
                Why didn’t steal - they stole, of course. Only Western countries stole an order of magnitude more
                wonderful excuse. is the same in court?

                I will answer in Jewish: were there any courts on this subject?
                Quote: kipod
                Quote: andj61
                and more commercially successful
                Can I have an example?

                For example, EDM equipment was invented in the 50s-60s by our people in the USSR, they even patented it, and then it was simple: at first they bought patents in the west, then they began to build units in their equipment, then they upgraded it and refused to pay. Moreover, they have already patented their equipment. Novelty - only bypassing the patent formula. Ours appealed, but there was a problem with the payment of lawyers - the courts did not finish it. That was in the 70s. And in the mid-80s, we managed to purchase this equipment ourselves! Something similar was also with the super-powerful presses. And how many various technologies we had stolen in the 90s is incomprehensible to the mind! For example, Samsung Electronics. Without hiding, they invited leading experts from specialized research institutes in television technology and, with their help, began to manufacture televisions and monitors for computers with the purchase of some Western technologies. In the 90s, even the Samsung functionaries themselves did not hide that without Soviet specialists and the constructive solutions and technologies they transmitted, there would have been no stormy take-off of Samsung. Isn't that theft?
                Quote: kipod
                Quote: andj61
                And now we have even better compliance with copyright laws than in the West
                okay, i.e. aren't stealing now?

                Already 10 years - no. The statement of the copyright holder is enough - and an administrative case is immediately instituted against the violator. There is even no obligation to deeply verify the information contained in the application. Russian law firms use this: they take powers of attorney from well-known brands, brands, holders, etc. to represent interests - and business will simply be nightmares. Our state may be slow, but in this regard it works extremely hard. Copyright compliance was one of the requirements for joining the WTO. They entered the WTO, there are no bonuses from this due to changes in the international situation, and copyright rules can be softened.
                Quote: kipod
                One of the requirements for China (trump) was copyright compliance and China caved in.

                Is China bent? wassat
                Yes, they only expressed their understanding of the US concern in this regard and expressed their willingness to cooperate on this topic - and that’s it! As they did not comply with copyright in China, they still do not. Only less advertising has become like: iPhone one-on-one with the original, but at a price 8 times less! And that’s it! bully hi
          2. Senior manager
            Senior manager April 11 2018 11: 01
            0
            Quote: kipod
            as I understand it, the USSR and Russia never stole anything.

            The FSA just didn’t steal, they just brought their heads with ideas to themselves, and subsequently the amersa lure their heads with ideas with their confessions, and steal them a little bit. And Israeli scientists from scratch gave the country nuclear weapons. And all around are white and fluffy, and especially the chosen ones, the most furry of all. Life-giving democracy, however.
          3. Panikovsky
            Panikovsky April 11 2018 19: 38
            +3
            Quote: kipod
            If you are so smart, why are you so poor?

            Are yours and our former Jews very rich?
        4. Swag
          Swag April 11 2018 18: 26
          +1
          and they’re neither cunning nor smart-traders. we threw them all 90s as the last suckers, just a lot of them, they are different, some exploit others, and the CCP party is all.)
      3. 72jora72
        72jora72 April 11 2018 08: 42
        +3
        China, as always, calmly sit aside.
        and as a result, they did not win a single war, even Vietnam jammed them.
        1. yehat
          yehat April 11 2018 09: 20
          +1
          China is a winner in ww2.
          Of course, the USA and the USSR did most of the work for them, but the fact remains.
      4. antivirus
        antivirus April 11 2018 11: 44
        0
        smart ones can bring 10-20 ships to Okinawa and axes in the Mediterranean will drop.
        It is dangerous to provoke retaliatory actions - and not only the mighty USA, but also peaceful China
      5. Swag
        Swag April 11 2018 18: 19
        0
        and where the mind is here, they will tear us to their work.
      6. zhekazs
        zhekazs April 12 2018 00: 48
        +1
        Quote: kipod
        China, as always, calmly sit aside.

        What side would China sit in? The world is already small. Do not stay out. Amerzoid has already begun to crap under China: economically - introducing duties on goods and militarily - they begin to flirt with Taiwan, sell weapons, including F35 - and what, China will sit aside? Will it be calm to watch?
        Quote: kipod
        The Chinese are smart.

        Nobody argues. But they outwitted themselves, sitting at their yellow river Yellow River and waiting for the corpse of an enemy passing by. If they fit in to help us in Syria, it would be easier for us and it will be easier for them to solve their problems with the Amersoid in the future.
        1. Normal ok
          Normal ok April 14 2018 14: 52
          0
          Quote: zhekazs
          Enter them to help us in Syria

          But does it need them to “help Russia”? Judging by their behavior, they are happy with the fact that Russia and the United States butt in Syria.
  2. kipod
    kipod April 11 2018 05: 46
    +1
    For China, the elimination of religious extremism in the Middle East is crucial, because in this way China will protect itself from terrorist attacks that have already taken place on Chinese territory.

    tales for the domestic Russian user.
    1. Vard
      Vard April 11 2018 05: 55
      0
      In Syria, up to three thousand separatists from China are fighting in ISIS ...
      1. kipod
        kipod April 11 2018 06: 02
        +1
        Quote: Vard
        In Syria, up to three thousand separatists from China are fighting in IS

        And let them fight themselves.
        In order to soak them, they are somehow in a hurry to climb into Syria.
        1. credo
          credo April 11 2018 11: 13
          0
          Quote: kipod
          Quote: Vard
          In Syria, up to three thousand separatists from China are fighting in IS

          And let them fight themselves.
          In order to soak them, they are somehow in a hurry to climb into Syria.

          They do it in other ways, but it is not advertised.
          1. kipod
            kipod April 11 2018 11: 17
            +1
            Quote: credo
            They do it in other ways, but it is not advertised.

            and only you know about it. laughing
        2. antivirus
          antivirus April 11 2018 11: 45
          0
          Syria are fighting and the Palestinians are gaining experience
    2. Same lech
      Same lech April 11 2018 05: 56
      +7
      tales for the domestic Russian user.

      Well, these are normal tales ...
      for an Israeli insider, they came up with more terrible tales of the type ...
      Allegedly, the Assad animal poisons the poor Ishilovites with children with chlorine every morning and then fries them in a frying pan for dinner smile
      You yourself are great masters of Jewish fairy tales and epics in the world media.
      1. kipod
        kipod April 11 2018 06: 04
        +1
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        for an Israeli insider, they came up with more terrible tales of the type ...
        Allegedly, the Assad animal poisons the poor Ishilovites with children with chlorine every morning and then fries them in a frying pan for dinner

        Frankly, we don’t give a damn about Assad, nor about his subjects.
        Poisons - for me so let poisons. These are their internal breakdowns, we wish success to both sides.
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        you yourself are great masters of Jewish fairy tales and epics in the world media

        And on the topic have something to say?
        1. Same lech
          Same lech April 11 2018 06: 09
          +5
          Well, to be honest, I don’t give a damn what the Chinese are studying there ... it's their business ... I wish them success in this matter.
          And on the topic have something to say?


          Of course there is ... if you do not delve into the tales for the domestic Russian user. smile
          I believe the Chinese are trying on Russia's actions to their realities ... the only question is where the vector of their future expansion will be directed. what
          1. kipod
            kipod April 11 2018 09: 11
            +1
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            I believe the Chinese are trying on the actions of Russia to their realities ... the only question is where the vector of their future expansion will be directed

            Well, you're smart, guess 3 times laughing
        2. mkop
          mkop April 11 2018 08: 44
          +2
          Thinking and behavior of ordinary Nazis. Is your nation above all? Kill everyone around, along with your friends from the West, no less than the Nazis, with your slogans that Western civilization is the whole civilized world (again, the Nazi mindset).
          And about Assad, leave your empty words to yourself, there wouldn’t be a case - your planes would not fly to bomb the territory of a sovereign country. You can lie to someone else.
        3. Senior manager
          Senior manager April 11 2018 11: 04
          +2
          Quote: kipod
          Frankly, we don’t give a damn about Assad, nor about his subjects.

          Therefore, beat in Syria how much in vain. An interesting passage - from the territory of Lebanon you hit the Iranians in Syria. Well, they would hit Iran directly, or maybe the owner does not allow it?
          1. kipod
            kipod April 11 2018 11: 10
            +1
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            Therefore, beat in Syria how much in vain

            not in vain
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            Stealthily.

            More than 150 times .... from the undercoat: laughing
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            from the territory of Lebanon, hit the Iranians in Syria.

            Do you know what Lebanon is? No ?
            Well, sit and don’t trynd.

            Quote: St. Propulsion
            Well, they would hit Iran directly

            what for.? Iran from us is 1500 km. let them knock themselves back and they will be happy.
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            or maybe the owner does not allow?

            and the Russian Federation allows?
  3. Wolka
    Wolka April 11 2018 06: 53
    +5
    with all this, however, strong doubts are overcoming the celestial interference in the international conflict in Syria, they will sit out to the end, see on the ashes they want to play their part, otherwise they would like, they would have participated, Iran, despite all the unfavorable, has something to fight for ...
  4. Helmsman
    Helmsman April 11 2018 06: 59
    +5
    Comrades, and on this resource there are specialized sinologists or those who conduct analytics in China and everything connected with it? It is very interesting for me to hear comments on the info recently voiced by Satanovsky on Vesti FM, about the number of losses in the personnel of Western advisers and instructors in Syria. He referred to Chinese sources. I would be grateful for the links.
  5. vlad007
    vlad007 April 11 2018 08: 44
    0
    More useful information could be written about China.
  6. jncnfdybr
    jncnfdybr April 11 2018 09: 29
    +1
    If a big mess begins, China will not sit aside.
    1. MadCat
      MadCat April 11 2018 16: 57
      +1
      Quote: jncnfdybr
      If a big mess begins, China will not sit aside.

      Of course, they will be busy finishing off the “winner”.
  7. A.
    A. April 11 2018 13: 35
    0
    Quote: The same Lech
    The Chinese are smart.

    Not smart but cunning ... smile would be smart would not steal technology around the world.
    Only the Jews are more cunning than the Chinese ...

    Not quite right. Where the crest took place, the Jew has nothing to do.
  8. jncnfdybr
    jncnfdybr April 11 2018 17: 11
    +1
    Quote: MadCat
    Quote: jncnfdybr
    If a big mess begins, China will not sit aside.

    Of course, they will be busy finishing off the “winner”.

    Will there be a “winner”?
    1. MadCat
      MadCat April 11 2018 19: 45
      +1
      Quote: jncnfdybr
      Will there be a “winner”?

      the least affected party, which deigns to "help" everyone and everything for their expense of course.
  9. Doliva63
    Doliva63 April 11 2018 19: 11
    +5
    The topic of boobs is not disclosed (crossed out) - what the Chinese think about the study by the Americans of the actions of the Russian Federation in Syria. drinks
  10. NordUral
    NordUral April 11 2018 23: 16
    +1
    You should not be deceived either by our understanding of China, or, all the more, by a strange alliance with Erdogan. China will make an alliance with us, only the threat of defeat from the States will come, and Erdogan is a dark sultan with imperial ambitions, like Poles, only confident, smart and not yap like descendants of the gentry (this does not apply to the Polish people).
    We need to hope so far, then life will show, only for ourselves and for short-term, short-term partnerships, and even then with an eye out so as not to be shot in the back.
    God bless Trump, and the whole top of the United States! But he won’t give, give mind and Freedom to Putin and the country's leadership. I do not recognize the election results, but since we were defeated, and he beat the people, let him prove that he is worthy to lead the country and be the real Supreme.
    Chickens - we will go into oblivion, disgraced and humiliated.
  11. Normal ok
    Normal ok April 14 2018 14: 47
    0
    China is trying to capitalize on what is happening. From this point of view, it is worth considering the relationship between Russia and China, and not singing the praises of eternal friendship with the "fraternal Chinese people."
  12. chingachguc
    chingachguc April 15 2018 23: 03
    0
    It must be understood that both Americans, Russians, and Englishmen received their bases abroad not just like that, but as a result of various wars, crises, and conflicts. This means that China will not be able to expand its influence without entering into conflict with anyone. Here it’s impossible to climb silent glanders. The base in Djibouti, of course, is a good thing. But Djibouti is not a satellite of China, and there are no Chinese communications with this distant base. In which case this base will be blocked and instantly destroyed.