Military Review

The damage caused by the Ministry of Defense will be allowed to be compensated by installments.

31
Soldiers will have the opportunity in installments to compensate for the damage caused by them to the Armed Forces, according to News.




However, only those soldiers and officers who pleaded guilty and signed an obligation of compensation with an agreed schedule of cash payments will be able to take advantage of this benefit.

The Defense Ministry confirmed the preparation of a draft amendment to the law "On the material liability of servicemen."

“We are talking about clarifying the responsibility of soldiers, officers and citizens called up for charges for damage to property assigned to military units. The document details the procedure for compensation for damage. Now he is in agreement with the law enforcement agencies and is undergoing an independent anti-corruption examination, ”the newspaper explained to the department.

The amendments prepared also provide for sanctions against commanders who “did not take the necessary measures to compensate for the damage caused by the military unit to the guilty persons”.

The Defense Ministry noted that today it is only possible to collect damages from a serviceman through a court, which does not always take the side of the department: soldiers or officers of payment. "

According to Oleg Zherdev, the founder of the Russian Bar Association of law enforcement agencies "Guard", "after the adoption of the amendments, the command of the unit and the military will be able to solve the problem of payments directly in the units."

Cases where the destruction or damage of equipment worth hundreds of thousands or millions of rubles does not appear will be decided without the participation of the court,
added an expert.

The current legislation allows to recover 20% of the monthly income of a soldier. In exceptional cases (for example, if the fact of damage of equipment with the purpose of theft of components is proved), payments can reach 50%.
Photos used:
JOURNAL / Alexander Kazakov
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Wilderness
    Wilderness April 10 2018 11: 56
    +3
    Comrade Warrant Officer, can I watch TV? You can ... just don’t turn it on!)))
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K April 10 2018 12: 04
      +8
      ... The damage caused to the Ministry of Defense will be allowed to compensate by installments ...

      Inspired laughing

      1. Hire
        Hire April 10 2018 12: 19
        +11
        The military will have the opportunity ...

        This, like, went to a meeting? I wonder how this is consistent with the Constitution? I, after all, do not go out of my own accord to serve, but in a forced manner, fulfilling my duty. During the execution, I broke something, so don’t call anyone and nobody will break anything. Sur. I remember when I served, there was no question about this at all. What could not be repaired on their own, they simply wrote off everything.
        1. loki565
          loki565 April 10 2018 12: 24
          +4
          Nda Serdyukov nervously smokes on the sidelines))) And so it could be)))
        2. Warrior with machine gun
          Warrior with machine gun April 10 2018 13: 11
          +8
          baryyz capitalism in action, and do not care that the military may lose their lives, "but the iron is all over the place", now let these bookkeepers be stupid with their carcasses and risk in case of a buchi, and what kind of patriotism is involved in such situations? I’m unfortunate, it’s not necessary in the old fashioned way like cattle by external inspection, but even if he has “oil” in his head or is empty, he invented the technique for this purpose, but it needs to be worked out, it’s easier to determine as always by eye (to be honest, as many fellows during service fell, anywhere else then so much did not meet)
    2. den3080
      den3080 April 10 2018 12: 29
      +7
      I really thought about Taburetkin, Puzikova and Scarlet slippers remembered. But no ... about the soldiers and officers who, taken together, can never inflict the same damage to the Armed Forces as Taburetkin and Co. did.
  2. Vard
    Vard April 10 2018 11: 57
    +1
    I don’t understand ... if a shell got into the tank ... can its cost be deducted from the salary?
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii April 10 2018 12: 02
      +8
      Yes, if you lupanuli on it, but it turned out to be your own and was under repair. hi smile
    2. Ross_ulair
      Ross_ulair April 10 2018 12: 05
      +2
      Here, rather, the protagonist of recent history should figure. Who wanted to make a dry fire in the steppe, next to the armored personnel carrier under the maskset. Bonfire went to fame!
      These comrades will now pay by installments laughing
      Caution! A lot of obscene language! repeat
      1. Vard
        Vard April 10 2018 12: 10
        +9
        That is, the warrior is to blame for the fact that we do not have the opportunity to heat canned food in the field ... this time ... that the camouflage network is burning ... and the armored personnel carrier ... is the same ... I'm afraid to imagine ... what if the war ?!
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 10 2018 12: 21
          +2
          Scorch, in armored boxes, noble.
        2. LiSiCyn
          LiSiCyn April 10 2018 12: 25
          +5
          Paek opened ?? Dry fuel seen ?? If your hands are out of ..... you at least put a microwave in the armored personnel carrier ... The whole thing is not subordination, there was no order to take food .. I decided to "quiet", but it turned out very loud ..
        3. parathyron
          parathyron April 10 2018 16: 24
          +2
          The warrior is guilty of ditching the general army military property by stupidity. We are used to the fact that the state is rich, it will not decrease from it, but we are financing this equipment through taxes. If he burned your apartment, would you just as well have forgiven him? This is about money. Now imagine that you have advanced in a small detachment on an armored personnel carrier behind enemy lines, and this gouge burned him. For your party, this means certain death.
      2. loki565
        loki565 April 10 2018 12: 20
        +2
        So what??? it's cheaper to slope than to end up in slavery in your own country for the rest of your life
    3. loki565
      loki565 April 10 2018 12: 07
      +3
      If you take into account that the cost of the tank is 120 lyam, this mortgage will go to your children)))
      1. Vard
        Vard April 10 2018 12: 23
        0
        120 million ... and with double ammunition ?! I would think...
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 10 2018 12: 24
        0
        Usually, if a tank is destroyed, it happens together with the crew responsible for this.
  3. bazzbazz
    bazzbazz April 10 2018 11: 58
    +1
    In the army, one can get tens of millions with one nimble hand movement. Well, why not, I signed a contract, be prepared to pay. On the citizen also responsible for damage!
    Can insure every unit in the army. Here is someone boiling up)
  4. bone1
    bone1 April 10 2018 12: 02
    +8
    It’s great. They’ll rake me at the training camp, but will I still pay for damaged equipment? Nacher then these fees, I’ll go to the partisans.
    1. Archivist Vasya
      Archivist Vasya April 10 2018 12: 09
      0
      Stop the panic! Everything will be a bunch. laughing
    2. Wilderness
      Wilderness April 10 2018 12: 21
      +2
      With regard to modern conditions - not everything is so simple. Imagine an alternative reality: the USSR in the Second World War - the cap.country (WTO, market, investors, etc.) - the Wehrmacht gives the Soviet command a writ of execution - "... to recover from the partisans the cost of property blown up in the train: three anti-aircraft guns, three ammunition boxes, tanks tiger ... also three ... ")))
  5. loki565
    loki565 April 10 2018 12: 05
    +2
    This will not add enthusiasm to the recruits))) It’s not enough that a year minus from life you’ll also be enslaved until the end of your life))) Popados is worse than mortgages, you live in your apartment at least)))
    1. Lyapis
      Lyapis April 10 2018 13: 53
      0
      Simple logic suggests that in order not to fall into “slavery”, it’s enough just not to spoil expensive military equipment — not to burn APCs, not to smash cars, not to lose weapons. request
      Or would it be better just to mock such kosyachniks, they say the army is rich, still buy? With money from our taxes, by the way.
      1. loki565
        loki565 April 10 2018 20: 12
        +1
        Let the equipment be insured !!! That is why a soldier risk his life when they treat him like that ??? Since we have a country of lawyers and economists, let them take Kalash in the mouth and defend it ...
  6. Masya masya
    Masya masya April 10 2018 12: 06
    +4
    Me: - Let's go buy an iPhone!
    Salary: - None.
    Me: - But today is Black Friday!
    Salary: - NOT ENOUGH BLACK !!!
    And if anything, it’s not funny at all ...
  7. Slavik74
    Slavik74 April 10 2018 12: 11
    +1
    Everything that the senior officers sold will be written off to the younger ones.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. Moore
    Moore April 10 2018 12: 14
    +1
    It is not very clear what the novelty of the idea is.
    Here in this:
    However, only those soldiers and officers who pleaded guilty and signed an obligation of compensation with an agreed schedule of cash payments will be able to take advantage of this benefit.
    ??
    And what is the point for the military? The hope that the command will charge less than the court? So that the first audit takes the commander for the zugunder for understating the damage?
    If the damage exceeds the possibilities of a lump sum payment, the court will still issue a writ of execution and will pay premium through the financial part with the same deferral of not more than 20%.
    The meaning, IMHO, is only one thing: not to spoil relations with the command.
  10. BAI
    BAI April 10 2018 14: 01
    +1
    Cases where the destruction or damage of equipment worth hundreds of thousands or millions of rubles does not appear will be decided without the participation of the court,

    How is it in a joke?
    "Now I understand why captains prefer to sink with the ship."
    Let's say the Kuznetsov comes back to the Mediterranean Sea and drowns a couple of fighters again. Who will pay?
    By the way, it is not clear from the article, but what about the equipment lost during the hostilities. Reimburse too?
  11. Wilderness
    Wilderness April 10 2018 14: 48
    +2
    Such a law would be applied to deputies and any ministers of finance, they save a penny today - they lose billions tomorrow and do not care for everyone.
  12. igorbrsv
    igorbrsv April 11 2018 12: 24
    0
    Like a tank knocked out-tankers into slavery?
  13. impostor
    impostor April 11 2018 21: 01
    0
    The Baltic Fleet MA justified. Someone got drunk.