The Perseus project (CVS401 PERSEUS) is a promising universal RCC of the 21st century

20
Paris Air Show 2011 - 21 June 2011 MBDA PRESENTS DRAFT CVS401 PERSEUS:
MULTI-PURPOSE UNIVERSAL heavy strike complex of long-range weapons for 2030 and for a deep perspective. Designed for land and sea-based.

Steve Wadey, MBDA Executive MBDA UK
"Perseus CVS401 is an ideal synthesis of the latest achievements and innovations expected in the near future. The ambitious project involves equipping promising sea-based platforms for 2030 g to achieve superiority at sea."
The complex is intended to replace the current generation of heavy anti-ship and cruise missiles.
The CVS401 PERSEUS system under development will be able, if necessary, to be launched from sea and land mobile platforms, submarines and patrol aircraft aviation. Universal SU will allow an attack on naval targets, stationary and mobile land objects. The modular bay of the warhead allows you to place warheads of the required power.


The system initially laid the ability to overcome the most effective means of missile / air defense. The complex is designed for tactical systems. weapons operating through complex communication links at the junction of sea, land and air combat missions.
The high-strength ultra-light composite rocket body, with a low ESR, will allow maneuvering at cruising supersonic speeds in 2,5 M.
In the manufacture of materials used increased stability at high temperatures. The spatial structure was calculated with complex computer modeling.
Engine : compact multimode straight-through solid fuel supersonic continuous combustion, on the principle of continuous wave detonation technology CDWE (fuel and oxidizer are mixed at the front of the detonation wave).
Structural scheme of fuel injection technology CDWE.
Project "Perseus" (CVS401 PERSEUS) - a promising universal anti-ship missile system of the XXI century

CDWE also reduces the likelihood of fuel ignition to the combustion chamber.
These unique characteristics of the burden and impulse open up the possibility of execution of the rocket body of small dimensions and starting weight, but with satisfactory parameters affecting the warhead.
CVS401 PERSEUS is a weapon to break through enemy defenses at a distance of 300 km and is effective for use against fast moving, maneuverable targets that it can reach in minutes.
Missile weight about 800kg, 5 size m. UHH coincide with the parameters Exocet (MM.38, MM.40, MM.40 Block3)that completely solves the logistical aspects and without any problems will allow placing on the existing media and adapting PU, with minimal modifications.


Extremely low flight profile: above water 2m, above ground 5m. Weight of warhead = 200 kg + 2x 40 kg.
Speed ​​at 3M, at sea level 2M, cruising speed 2,5M
(according to some experts / Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG /, to achieve such indicators it takes at least 12 years for forced research).


In the technical specification of the concept, it is possible to carry either a warhead of increased power, or the main warhead (in the case) and two additional detachable warheads of individual guidance, in this case the CVS401 PERSEUS simultaneously acts both as a means of delivery and as an independent weapon.

This innovation will allow either to increase the area of ​​destruction of a large object (aircraft carrier deck) or to hit a group of ships in a warrant (escort and main guarded object)

The overall effectiveness of the weapon in communication and its flight characteristics (maneuverability, speed), as well as the ability of its sensors to detect missile defense / air defense systems, EPR, and the effectiveness of the warhead were all evaluated and calculated using the latest digital modeling systems.

The command and control system of the complex will be integrated into the general combat network, target designation can be provided by its own carrier, third-party UAV, satellite, aircraft, ship, commando group.
High mobility, short delivery time, quick response to the task, variability in the power of the warhead, the ability to hit several targets simultaneously - allow the use of a rocket for counter-terrorist operations
Ultra-modern dual-mode sensors-sensors, combined in batch: AESA (AFAR radar) in combination with a laser navigation "radar" (LADAR / LIDAR) allow you to perform all weather operations with any source of external target designation. Multi-mode radar - SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) and DBS (Doppler Radar) allow you to detect targets in a given range of distance.

The overall reliability of the weapon system is supported by an advanced hybrid navigation system.

According to military experts, through the 15-20 years, the main threat to the NATO navy and the targets for the complex being developed can only be the navy of Russia and China and (with a low probability) the navy of Argentina.

The rest (except for NATO member countries) contenders for dominance in the Ocean in the next 50 years are not expected.

The current favorites in the market of anti-ship missiles:
3M54E Club- M SS-N-27 "Sizzler"
L = 8,22 m D = 533 mm Starting M = 2300 kg RV = 400 kg High-explosive or cluster firing range = 220 km V flight March = 0,8 M In the target: 2,9 M Trajectory: 20-10 m

3М55 P-800 "Onyx" / "Yakhont" SS-N-26 Strobile PJ-10 "BrahMos" (PJ-10 "BrahMos")
L = 8,9 m, D = 0,7 m, Mass: 3100 kg Speed ​​at height: 750 m / s (2,6 M), Surface speed: 2 M
Distance: along the combined trajectory (the length of the final section 40 km) - 300 km
on a low-altitude trajectory - 120 km, flight altitude 10-14000


As can be seen from the above specifications, the CVS401 PERSEUS has a significant advantage, especially in terms of the weight of warhead / launch weight, dimensions, flight profile, cassette warhead.
However, not everything is so tragic. CVS401 exists so far only, at best, on paper, an intensive stage of R & D is underway.
But you should not lose sight of the fact that all components can be reproduced at the existing technological level of technology, except for the unique engine of course ...
While there is time for an "asymmetric" response, it should be taken into account the potential of MBDA and enormous production capabilities.
MBDA (Matra BAE Dynamics Alenia) address: 37 boulevard de Montmorency 75016 Paris France.
MBDA is the only global concern capable of designing and producing missiles and missile systems, a full range of current and future operational needs of the three types of armed forces (land, sea and air).
In general, the group offers a wide range of 45 rocket attack systems and countermeasures.
PRODUCTION (decree. Rocket science only)
Ground-based air defense:Aspide, ASTER, CAMM, LFK NG, MEADS, MICA, MISTRAL, RAPIER / JERNAS
airborne:AIR DOMINANCE, AASM, ACTIONS, ASRAAM, BANG, CAMM, COUNTERMEASURES, DIAMOND BACK, DUAL MODE, BRIMSTONE, LASER GUIDED PARS-350 LR
land-based:ERYX, FIRE SHADOW, MILAN ER, PARS 3 LR, SOUVIM 2, TiGER, MARITIME SUPERIORITY
sea-based:ASPIDE, ASTER, CAMM ,, EXOCET, FASGW-ANL, MARTE, MdCN, MICA, MILAS ,, MISTRAL, OTOMAT / TESEO, VL SEAWOLF
MBDA owns industrial enterprises in four countries in Europe and the USA.
The company's turnover in 2010 has reached € 2.800.000.000. It has customers in more than 90 armed forces around the world.
Last year, at the Farnborough Air Show, it demonstrated its concept CVS 10: a family of guided combat missiles of urban areas Sniper (weighing 1kg)


and Enforcer (5 kg)




[I]In ancient Greek mythology, Perseus is the god of the seas, the winner of the Gorgon Medusa, the savior of Andromeda (later married). Sly, kidnapped Graya's 3 sisters (with three 1 eyes and a 1 tooth) and a tooth and an eye. This tooth and an eye were returned to them for winged sandals, a bag, and Aida's magic helmet (the invisible hat).


Interesting fact: in the video - the demonstrator of the CVS401 PERSEU capabilities, the anti-ship missile attacks, something similar to the promising destroyer of the USA, the Zumwalt type.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ares
    +6
    April 30 2012 07: 47
    Thanks to the author for the review. A very interesting RCC concept. If we manage to keep within the declared mass-dimensional limits and at the same time have a high supersonic speed and the declared range, then this will be a real breakthrough. Lightweight multiplatform high-precision assassins capable of operating both on the ground and on land will raise the fire capabilities of primarily tactical aviation to a new level. Light boats can become a formidable force, and land units will have a new highly mobile "long arm".
    I liked the idea of ​​shared warheads.
    1. 755962
      +1
      April 30 2012 19: 00
      Cruise missiles, which played a significant role in the confrontation between superpowers and in local military conflicts of the second half of the XNUMXth century and the new century, will remain the most important weapons. The prospect of the development of unified missiles will affect the cost and multifunctionality of products, as well as promising technologies.
  2. Redpartyzan
    +2
    April 30 2012 09: 24
    Yeah not bad. Perseus is a new trend in the environment of RCC. Our designers also need to think about it. The possibilities of the good old Granite are almost at an end and the yachting is already not up to the specifications ... we need new ideas!
  3. +2
    April 30 2012 09: 50
    Really interesting article.
    what kind of opposition from such missiles can be is just interesting.
  4. FTALL
    +10
    April 30 2012 09: 51
    An attempt to catch up with the development of the USSR 30 years ago 3M25 meteorite .. all the tests and development with us were completed 25 years ago and if in 10 years they reach the level of 1984, it will be possible to put into series with what we have developed all 3 versions of airborne and land .. limited production of an air version under the X-90 index has already begun)) And even the level of our today's developments, even in their colorful presentations, can’t draw enough imagination)) wink
    1. Neighbor
      +6
      April 30 2012 10: 57
      Quote: FTALL
      And they cannot even draw the level of our today's developments even in their colorful presentations - there will not be enough imagination))

      good drinks
      100 Pudovo. Not to mention what missiles we will have by 2030.
      If by 2014 - RCC Zircon will be - 13 Machs (4,3 km / s), maneuvering, stealth - range of 1000 km.
      This Amersky - know-how - to our technologies - (not to mention prices) - like a fast booty from Moscow to New York backing up. Just - about 30 years - it may be possible to crawl! wassat laughing
      Quote: Kars
      what kind of opposition from such missiles can be is just interesting.

      What kind of opposition. Yes, just on the way to the goal - the rocket will be cut down and that’s all - to go into the ocean with your nose. Already now we have such devices - allowing to do this. They are installed not only on ships, but also on helicopters - the rocket just misses 100% - leaves the target. Look at the Impact Force - there is an issue just about these systems.
      So they say - when we tested them - everything was stuck with Amer spies. They tried to sniff out what's what. Then one Traitor - almost steamed our technology to Amer. In time for the 5th point they took - right now, probably sitting - 25 years with confiscation.
      In general, nothing came out of the Amers. And now this technology is the State. Secret.
      drinks
      1. Ares
        +1
        April 30 2012 12: 12
        Quote: Neighbor
        If by 2014 - RCC Zircon will be - 13 Machs (4,3 km / s), maneuvering, stealth - range of 1000 km.


        This data is complete fiction. Such indicators cannot be, in principle, if it is not a ballistic missile.

        Quote: Neighbor
        What kind of opposition. Yes, just on the way to the goal - the rocket will be cut down and that’s all - to go into the ocean with your nose. Already now we have such devices - allowing to do this. They are installed not only on ships, but also on helicopters - the rocket just misses 100% - leaves the target. Look at the Impact Force - there is an issue just about these systems.


        I would strongly advise you to make as few conclusions as possible on the Striking Force. Usually this program has very little in common with reality.
        1. Neighbor
          +5
          April 30 2012 12: 26
          Quote: Ares
          This data is complete fiction. Such indicators cannot be, in principle, if it is not a ballistic missile.

          And you read 2 articles - which took place to be on this resource - one week ago, the other from half a month ago.
          It is these data that were given there. And the developers admitted - that the creation of such a rocket is an Archicomplex task - but it will be completed on time. I didn’t invent all of this myself. Many other FREQUENT users of this resource - probably also remember these articles.
          And then I look you 3 days ago just registered - and already teach life here people. They would have looked at least for a start in the Archive. Then they would say so.
          Quote: Ares
          fewer Impact Findings

          What is the basis of your such unflattering opinion about the Striking Force. A very good program - I have all the releases on my computer. And not once - not a single issue - made me doubt what they were telling and showing. Everything is absolutely true, backed up by video materials, interviews with Generals and very respected scientists - luminaries - if you want.
          I'd rather believe them than you - it is not clear to anyone. Agree. tongue
          1. Ares
            +1
            April 30 2012 12: 58
            Quote: Neighbor
            And you read 2 articles - which took place to be on this resource - one week ago, the other from half a month ago.
            It is these data that were given there. And the developers admitted - that the creation of such a rocket is an Archicomplex task - but it will be completed on time. I didn’t invent all of this myself. Many other FREQUENT users of this resource - probably also remember these articles.


            You can write anything you want. As they say, the paper will endure everything.
            And about the data given:
            Movement in dense layers of the atmosphere at such a speed is impossible due to temperature limitations. Such a rocket would simply melt as a result of temperature heating during friction against air. Heating at stated speeds with a margin exceeds the melting point of the most refractory metals.

            Quote: Neighbor
            What is the basis of your such unflattering opinion about the Striking Force. A very good program - I have all the releases on my computer. And not once - not a single issue - made me doubt what they were telling and showing. Everything is absolutely true, backed up by video materials, interviews with Generals and very respected scientists - luminaries - if you want.


            Of course, if it’s so convenient for you, you can continue to believe. All reasonable people have long recognized its failure, as well as the characteristic propaganda orientation of Ilyin and his lack of basic technical knowledge. On the network, this program causes a lot of jokes.
            That there is only a nasal American voice under a hiss, in each program dubbing the text of the report to the CIA director about the new Russian "miracle of weapons" wink With dates, notes of urgency and secrecy of the report.
            Interestingly, the CIA transmits data on its reports exclusively to the Striking Force smile It definitely inspires confidence)
            1. +3
              April 30 2012 14: 33
              Quote: Ares
              Such a rocket would simply melt as a result of temperature heating during friction against air. Heating at stated speeds with a margin exceeds the melting point of the most refractory metals.

              What has metals to do with it? On "Buran" and on American shuttles, a special ceramic coating is successfully used to protect the product from overheating, developed thirty-five years ago, remember the Teflon pans. And the speed of their entry into the atmosphere is about the same order. Now, I think, there are already more advanced materials, IMHO.
              1. Ares
                0
                April 30 2012 14: 42
                Quote: Nick
                And the speed of their entry into the atmosphere is approximately the same order.


                The speed of entry into the dense layers of the atmosphere is much lower.

                Quote: Nick
                successfully applied a special coating from overheating, developed another thirty-five years ago, remember Teflon pans.


                No coating can withstand a fairly long exposure to temperatures above 5000 degrees when flying in dense layers of the atmosphere at the indicated ranges. It just contradicts physics.
                1. +1
                  April 30 2012 14: 53
                  Quote: Ares
                  The speed of entry into the dense layers of the atmosphere is much lower.

                  But the speed in rarefied layers is much higher, approximately 25 Max.
                2. snek
                  +6
                  April 30 2012 15: 04
                  Quote: Neighbor
                  And you read 2 articles - which took place to be on this resource - one week ago, the other from half a month ago. It is these data that were given there. And the developers admitted - that the creation of such a rocket is an Archicomplex task - but it will be completed on time. I didn’t invent all of this myself. Many other FREQUENT users of this resource - probably also remember these articles.

                  Well, I'm a frequent user - I remember one for sure. Just the fact that something was published on this site does not make it true - there was once an article that the Russians are a separate branch of humanity, which is almost older than dinosaurs.
                  Quote: Neighbor
                  And then I look you 3 days ago just registered - and already teach life here people. They would have looked at least for a start in the Archive. Then they would say so.

                  Survived - hazing on the site. A person tells you truthful things - that 13 strokes in the atmosphere is the fruit of someone’s not too healthy imagination, and you turn to personality.
                  Quote: Neighbor
                  What is the basis of your such unflattering opinion about the Striking Force. A very good program - I have all the releases on my computer. And not once - not a single issue - made me doubt what they were telling and showing. Everything is absolutely true, backed up by video materials, interviews with Generals and very respected scientists - luminaries - if you want.

                  He was a fan of the program. I reviewed some issues more than once. But there is enough nonsense. In a certain issue, they told how the T-72 holds several 120 mm guns at close range.
                  Quote: Nick
                  What has metals to do with it? On "Buran" and on American shuttles, a special ceramic coating is successfully applied, which protects the product from overheating, which was developed thirty-five years ago.

                  Covering the "bottom" of shuttles and snowstorms is an expensive material. Plus, as Ares pointed out, it's not durable. The SR-71 was the only aircraft that could fly for a long time at speeds slightly above Mach 3 and was made of special alloys and titanium. And then he barely kept that temperature. The MiG-25 could also develop the same speed, but it could not keep it for hours, again because of the materials.
                  1. +2
                    April 30 2012 16: 01
                    Quote: snek
                    Sam was a fan of the program


                    I can still see. The Russian response to the discovery.
                    Quote: snek
                    Plus, as Ares remarked, it's not for long-term use.


                    And here it is just interesting.
                    RCC is vet a one-time device, and how much does it fly then those 300 km at 13 speeds will be?

                    Scientists that ours, that their brainy guys, so that everything can only be when.
                    1. snek
                      +5
                      April 30 2012 16: 05
                      Quote: Kars
                      Russian response to the discovery.

                      A fairly accurate definition: both there and there they can freeze such that sometimes you doubt the adequacy of the authors.
                      Quote: Kars
                      RCC is vet a one-time device, and how much does it fly then those 300 km at 13 speeds will be?

                      Yes, in general the question is very complicated, but so far the question with materials that can withstand huge temperatures remains the most difficult when creating hypersonic devices.
                      1. +1
                        April 30 2012 21: 26
                        So I read everything and think about how it happens in an internal combustion engine. In general, the first orbital speed of 1 km / s and 8 M is 12 km / s.
                  2. +5
                    April 30 2012 20: 41
                    about torpedoes "squall" the same thing said that they say 60 km / h for a torpedo is the limit. However, our torpedo develops a speed of 360 ... 500 km / h according to various sources. So what's the problem? There is such a new direction as plasma aerodynamics. Work in this area, as you can understand, is underway, but the information is very poor. By separating the anti-ship missile system from the air, as before the torpedo from the water, we will do this too.
                    1. +2
                      April 30 2012 23: 01
                      As far as I heard, plasma dynamics can reduce drag by 60% - no more. And 13 mach is too much, how can one maneuver at such a speed ??? Yes, the RCC will fly apart, and 13 flights, for sure this is a very short section of the trajectory (for example, the final stage before approaching the target), and the marching speed will be about 3-4 flights.

                      And I don’t see anything supernatural in this rocket! Small size, not very high speed, stealth technology (well, this fetish is now used everywhere in the States, because it is strange that in 2030 they won’t even use them for bullets). And the red color is nonsense))) It is clear that this is for advertising, but it painfully brightly turns out.

                      Again, I repeat - a height of 2 m above the least level (it limits the application even in small waves, and fuel consumption increases significantly). I’m just sure that if the rocket is created as planned, then it will be out of date by then ...
                    2. Passing
                      +4
                      1 May 2012 18: 14
                      Quote: Snow
                      about torpedoes "squall" the same thing said that they say 60 km / h for a torpedo is the limit. However, our torpedo develops a speed of 360 ... 500 km / h according to various sources. So what's the problem?

                      The problems are usually the smallest such nuances.
                      For example, the super-propagated Flurry goes at such a speed only and exclusively at the surface, at large depths the gas cavity stops working and the speed accordingly drops to typical. And even more so, the Flurry does not have its own GOS due to the presence of the same gas cavity in front of the nose.
                      It can be safely assumed that if Zircon flies at such a speed, it will be completely and exclusively in the stratosphere.
                      In sci-fi plasma aerodynamics, there’s also a small such nuance - how can a radar seeker work through a plasma curtain?
              2. postman
                +2
                2 May 2012 02: 45
                Quote: Nick
                Ceramic special coating is successfully applied on "Buran" and on American shuttles

                NIK- they (Buran, Shuttle, CA) - the task is different: BRAKE. Entering the atmosphere.
                Descent, as a rule from a height of 200 km, the exposure time (distance) of high temperatures is only 10 seconds / 40 km (from 120 to 80), there is practically no atmosphere there. The entrance angle is strictly maintained (otherwise it will burn out or ricochet)
                Buran and Shuttle "brake" with the bottom.
                / On the nose fairing and toes of the wing of the device, where temperatures exceed 1260 ° C, carbon fiber reinforced carbon material was used. In the process of the spacecraft returning to Earth, this material is destroyed, and it must be replaced with a new one before each subsequent flight.
                (Ablation coating) /

                RCC does not fly at such a height, RCC does not fly so little in time

                In a plasma cocoon, it is not possible, communication, radar, i.e. guidance.

                In addition to temperatures (more than 5000 g. C), that the RCC would move at a speed of 13M (!!!?) In the dense layers of the atmosphere: it must be accelerated to such a speed and maintain this speed.
                What would this turn out to be RCC for a flight at 300 km, at a speed of 13 m (?) Would be the size of a Proton
                1. +1
                  3 May 2012 19: 21
                  Quote: Postman
                  In addition to temperatures (more than 5000gr.С), the RCC would move at a speed of 13М (!!!?) In dense layers of the atmosphere: it must be accelerated to such a speed and maintain this speed. That would be the RCC for a flight on 300km, with a speed 13m (?) Will be the size of a Proton launch vehicle

                  To be honest, I do not know the trajectory and dynamics of the Zircon flight and, perhaps, even most likely, this speed will be maintained only on a part of the route. Yes, I actually wanted to say that scientific and technical thought does not stand still, that what seems impossible today may become commonplace tomorrow. New materials, new aerodynamic solutions, etc.
                  1. postman
                    0
                    3 May 2012 19: 59
                    Quote: Nick
                    dynamics of the Zircon flight a

                    There is no Zircon. Yes and will not be with such parameters. Achinea is.
                    USA November 17, 2011 dispersed AHW (Advanced Hypersonic Weapon) to 5-8 (!) M at an altitude of 70-000 km. In the upper layers!
                    Where atmospheric pressure is less than 1,7 million bar (at sea level 1,3 bar), and density = less than 0,001 kg / m3 (at sea level-1,29 kg / m3
                    In the "upper" layers of the atmosphere, where "Meteorites do not withstand resistance and, burning, as a result of friction in the upper atmosphere, lose most of their mass"
                    AHW - Recognized by the THREE STAGE STARS launcher
                    CREATED and of the 2 first stages of the UGM-27 Polaris MBRPL and the third stage (booster unit) ORBUS-1A
                    The total weight of the system for 17000kg.
                    Well, what is RCC? Who will be its bearer?
                    It’s easier to shoot the ICBMs on ships as the Chinese gather.
  5. Railways
    +4
    April 30 2012 09: 54
    Production will cost a pretty penny. Another crisis in Europe and rising oil prices may put an end to this RCC.
  6. Jaguar
    +3
    April 30 2012 10: 31
    Strongly optimistic characteristics. For example, from which carrier will the range be reached to 300 km and with what trajectory. Maybe the plane will launch it from a great height and it will fly to the target without any low-altitude trajectory.
    1. postman
      0
      4 May 2012 02: 27
      Quote: Jaguar
      Jaguar

      300 is when starting from a surface ship (this is the project specification).
      she (the rocket) has a direct-flow solid propellant supersonic continuous combustion.
      TT-only fuel. Oxidizing agent: air.
  7. +4
    April 30 2012 11: 31
    Altitude 2 m above sea level? And if the excitement is small, then the rocket will bite your nose? And its sky-high price ...
    1. postman
      0
      4 May 2012 02: 30
      Quote: Zerkalo
      And if the excitement

      will fly at a height of 2m from the top edge of the wave, in the presence of excitement
  8. KA
    KA
    0
    April 30 2012 15: 21
    They know how to advertise in the west smile
    High performance declared I am feeling that as with the F-35 succeed. wink
    A missile defense must be done with warheads (combat modules) being divided at the approach to the target with individual guidance and trajectories of approaching the target or diving into the water when reaching the target and attack like a torpedo rocket.
  9. - = KeepeR = -
    0
    April 30 2012 23: 22
    Yes dregs it all! Managing to develop this. Another PiaR move. And the counteraction to such things is simple - beam weapons, in other words, orbital lasers. And the development of lasers has long been in full swing and there is plenty of evidence for this. Having an orbital battle group, you can NO reduce all these hyper-duper-super sound rockets, and not only rockets.
    1. Ares
      +3
      1 May 2012 01: 44
      Quote: - = KeepeR = -
      And the counteraction to such things is simple - beam weapons, in other words, orbital lasers.


      But it has nothing to do with reality yet. You still offer the Death Star)
  10. mind1954
    -2
    1 May 2012 00: 47
    Amazing! We truly have a country of believers!
    4% go to church, and 84% call themselves believers!

    These wonderful statements: "I'd rather believe ..." -
    - this is amazing and touching, as it is
    not about women's ears and not about love !!!
  11. 0
    3 March 2015 14: 02
    Not like Zamwolt.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"