Beijing shut off the nuclear valve to Pyongyang

23
In the framework of meeting the requirements of the UN Security Council resolution, the PRC authorities banned the export to the DPRK of materials and technologies that can be used in the manufacture of weapons mass destruction RIA News.





As part of the implementation of UN Security Council resolution 2575, in accordance with the 16 and 18 articles of the Foreign Trade Act, stop exporting to the DPRK dual-use materials and technologies related to weapons of mass destruction and its means of transportation, and also dual-use materials for conventional weapons,
says the release of the ministry of commerce of China.

The ban came into force on the day of publication of this statement.

In total, the list includes "32 material, technology with potential use in the manufacture of weapons of mass destruction, including particle accelerators and centrifuges."

Recall, the new sanctions against Pyongyang, the UN Security Council approved December 22. The resolution adopted at the meeting was developed by the United States and was a “response” to another missile test in North Korea. The document, in particular, limits about 90% exports of refined petroleum products.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 9 2018 08: 24
    Well done, we discussed everything and fed the geese. smile
    1. +4
      April 9 2018 08: 38
      Eun does not need a nuclear club. Only an occasion gives for the deployment of missile defense systems of Americans. Correctly, China supported the decision of the UN Security Council.
      1. +2
        April 9 2018 09: 19
        North Korea is a zone of influence of China. Now the PRC army has grown to the level that it has the ability to suppress any military threat in its sphere of influence, so there is no longer any need for nuclear weapons in North Korea. Therefore, it is easier for China to remove nuclear weapons from there - so the dependence of the UK on China will increase and there will be fewer problems, and probably everyone will be better.
        Although it seems to me, this is not the best news for Eun’s authority.
  2. +2
    April 9 2018 08: 50
    Just ripened now ??? This Korean, apparently, was even tired of the Chinese. And if you think so, then it would be necessary to take away a nuclear toy from Kim because it is unsafe. God forbid RK and Japan decides to get hold of its nuclear weapons under the guise of danger from the DPRK and PRC, and these guys are not backward North Korea - they blind quickly and much
    1. +5
      April 9 2018 09: 10
      Is it easy to take a toy? A sovereign country?
      If a policeman comes up to you and says, give me the phone, otherwise you’ll throw it in your head!
      What right do we have to act on the basis of speculation? Or act like the USA)
      1. +1
        April 9 2018 09: 20
        strictly speaking, nuclear weapons are not exactly North Korean property. Technologies and materials were provided for a long time by the USSR and China. And they do not take it away - they stop supporting development.
      2. 0
        April 9 2018 09: 47
        The DPRK is an extremely poor state, it survived only due to handouts from the PRC and the Russian Federation, and periodically due to assistance from the UN. If this faucet is blocked, then Kim will start major problems. In addition, he obtained nuclear weapons illegally (well, based on international treaties).
        And yes, the PLA will have enough funds to cover all the DPRK missile bases at once and prevent missile launches from the apple. And ordinary forces will clean up everything that remains because the PRC’s army is no less, but equipped much better.
        Again, nuclear weapons in the hands of the DPRK are not very good for the reason that the ROK and Japan can also start their nuclear weapons development programs. What will look justified because they will be threatened by a nuclear DPRK, the Russian Federation, and even more so it will be very unprofitable for China to have 2 more states with nuclear weapons at hand. And these guys will be able to develop it in an extremely short time.
  3. 0
    April 9 2018 09: 12
    China will not, so the Khokhlomas will again sell their thread like rocket engines this morning.
  4. +1
    April 9 2018 09: 19
    Quote: bazzbazz
    Is it easy to take a toy? A sovereign country?
    If a policeman comes up to you and says, give me the phone, otherwise you’ll throw it in your head!
    What right do we have to act on the basis of speculation? Or act like the USA)

    This sovereign country has become its Big Brother (PRC) across the throat. And take away? Yes, elementary. They will deliver an ultimatum to Eun. Or or.
    Or in power without a nuclear baton and under our auspices - or without power and without a "baton". He will bring his charges on a silver platter ... There are always ways to put pressure
    1. 0
      April 9 2018 09: 36
      And here on the couch, for the fun will be the process of selecting a club ?! At our borders. Tens of thousands of people, and even millions, can die.
      1. 0
        April 9 2018 09: 48
        Well, as an option, RK and Japan will acquire their clubs. I do not think that such an option will suit everyone, and it is possible to strangle the country not by military means. You can also organize a coup.
        1. +1
          April 10 2018 23: 12
          Quote: NordOst16
          You can also organize a coup.

          Coup? In North Korea? However, you are a dreamer ... smile
          1. 0
            April 11 2018 07: 26
            And what an option! Bulk on a trip with a one-way ticket.
          2. 0
            April 11 2018 07: 56
            And the scoop was considered indestructible hi
  5. +2
    April 9 2018 09: 48
    Quote: oleg-gr
    Eun does not need a nuclear club. Only an occasion gives for the deployment of missile defense systems of Americans. Correctly, China supported the decision of the UN Security Council.

    Yes, what are you? What did you want China to say? Well really? In the spirit of .... "I put on the decision of the UN Security Council and will continue to further develop ..."
    Do not make anyone laugh! In diplomacy, there is sometimes an abyss between “talking” and “doing”!
    My words are confirmed by the simple fact that the DPRK, being almost 50 years under sanctions and in "complete isolation", managed to create its own nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles.
    1. +1
      April 9 2018 10: 36
      Quote: konstantin68
      In diplomacy, there is sometimes an abyss between “talking” and “doing”!

      good This is the same as a screech recently began regarding the expulsion of North Korean workers from Russia. Either what yellowness blurted out, or one of the local governors turned on the "proactive and near" ... request In fact, the Koreans are working quietly and no expulsion is expected.
  6. 0
    April 9 2018 09: 53
    Quote: bazzbazz
    And here on the couch, for the fun will be the process of selecting a club ?! At our borders. Tens of thousands of people, and even millions, can die.

    And this is already beyond our will. They will select it one way or another. Either the Chinese have bloodless (or little blood), or our "sworn friends", but with millions of victims in the region. Eunu "club" one way or another, but will not leave. The same Chinese.
    1. +3
      April 10 2018 21: 52
      there is already a "club" ... and it’s very difficult to take it away .. China showed solidarity with the world community (like Russia) solidarity to prevent nuclear weapons ... but steps to destroy it (nuclear weapons) are not visible ... for the DPRK now the question is food supplies from China and the Russian Federation ... but they are trying to bring democratic mattresses to the “dual purpose”: a nuclear physicist eats rice, and a well-fed one continues "malicious" activity (sanctions against Russia are motivated by the same maliciousness) means compare rice to nuclear charge ... prohibit supplies, let everything go dry, and democracy will prevail
  7. 0
    April 9 2018 10: 27
    Did the Chinese put the Eun down? May be...
    1. +2
      April 9 2018 21: 10
      No need to be naive. Officially, atatat was discharged, unofficially the nuclear program is supported by China and Russia. The DPRK nuclear club is needed to restrain the greyhound of the United States and its colonies. Now they are starting to bargain.
  8. 0
    April 9 2018 11: 06
    Quote: Old26
    Eunu "club" one way or another, but will not leave. The same Chinese.

    Everything will remain as it is, no one will take it from anyone. Is it really not clear that the US economic war with China has begun, and the DPRK is a good lever of pressure on the Chinese outposts and outposts. At the same time, one must understand that everything that Eun does is consistent with X.
  9. 0
    April 9 2018 12: 33
    Note! The United States gives its allies security guarantees, and why China and Russia do not give such a guarantee to the DPRK? North Korea is forced to take care of itself. Hence all these conflicts. Russia throws its own, but I did not expect this from China!
  10. +1
    April 9 2018 19: 04
    In fact, this “eternal” C somehow does not inspire confidence. Is it not Gorbachev who is Chinese, trying to integrate China through Hong Kong into the world behind the scenes?
    Then the decision is expected.