Military Review

The OPCW mission inspected Russia. And when are they going to the USA?

42
Departmental edition of the Ministry of Defense "A red star" reports that experts of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical weapons (OPCW) in Russia was inspected. This inspection draws attention to itself in connection with recent events, when official London continues baseless accusations against the Russian Federation in the case of allegedly poisoning the spy Skrypal and his daughter in Salisbury.


The inspection team, as noted, included experts from the technical secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The Ministry of Defense does not report which objects were checked by this commission in Russia. It can be assumed that this is one of the enterprises where work on the destruction of the last volumes of the chemical weapons arsenal in the Russian Federation was completed.

The OPCW mission inspected Russia. And when are they going to the USA?


However, there is no evidence that the OPCW inspects facilities, for example, in the United States or Britain? Recall that it was with the United States that Russia signed at one time an agreement on the disposal of chemical weapons. Russia has fully fulfilled its obligations, while the United States still maintains an impressive arsenal of chemical weapons. At the same time, Washington is sending excuses from the series: "We do not have the funds for this yet." Is this with a military budget of 700 billion dollars? ..

By the way, if the OPCW inspects facilities in Russia, then why did the commission of this organization for a whole year since the incident in Syrian Khan-Sheikhoun never bothered to get to this city? On the other hand, they blamed the “Assad regime” and the SAR government forces with lightning speed - exactly the same as today London unfoundedly blames Russia on the situation with the Crypts.
Photos used:
MO RF
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 6 2018 06: 47
    +11
    Perhaps, to withdraw from this treaty and stop letting all sorts of nasty things like inspectors, and in reality spies, into Russia at sensitive facilities?
    1. The black
      The black April 6 2018 06: 53
      +4
      Well, that's it ... God forbid they will see buckwheat in stores ... wassat ... and it will start in a new way .. "In Russia, OM is sold directly in stores" laughing
    2. svp67
      svp67 April 6 2018 06: 54
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Perhaps, to withdraw from this treaty and stop letting all sorts of nasty things like inspectors, and in reality spies, into Russia at sensitive facilities?

      It makes no sense. Believe me, now they are more useful than harm.
      In general, the news completely sounds like this:
      Representatives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation said that specialists from the OPCW visited Russia last week.
      Among other things, Russia was also visited by an inspection of experts from Portugal under the auspices of the OSCE in accordance with the Vienna Document 2011.
      This document was created to regulate confidence-building measures between countries.
      Also in the newspaper of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation "Red Star" it says that Russia carried out two inspections. We are talking about verification in the United States under a strategic offensive arms reduction treaty, as well as an inspection in Ireland under the auspices of the OSCE.
    3. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 April 6 2018 06: 57
      +2
      The OPCW is one of the pet dogs of the United States and its vassals, it is hardly worth waiting for some inspections from them that are not to please the owners. As a result, the mattress didn’t give a damn about this agreement, and why should we observe it then and even more so accept some commissions.
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 6 2018 07: 02
        +3
        Quote: Spartanez300
        The OPCW is one of the indoor dogs of the West, it is hardly worth waiting for some inspections from them which are not to please the owners.

        But nothing that there and our specialists are?
        1. dik-nsk
          dik-nsk April 6 2018 07: 07
          +1
          But nothing that there and our specialists are?
          Well, why are you so cruel, here's how now people shout "mattresses all bought," without understanding the question? wink laughing
          1. Spartanez300
            Spartanez300 April 6 2018 07: 32
            0
            Decent people before wedging into someone else's conversation ask permission or apologize. and generally dispense with sneaky comments.
            1. svp67
              svp67 April 6 2018 07: 40
              +1
              Quote: Spartanez300
              Decent people before wedging into someone else's conversation ask permission.

              On such sites, if someone wants to have a face-to-face conversation, they use "personal mail" or specifically contact their opponent. I just expressed my opinion about your comment, which did not have a specific addressee.
              1. Spartanez300
                Spartanez300 April 6 2018 07: 44
                0
                Comment on wedging into someone else's conversation not at your address but at: dik-nsk (Dmitry).
            2. dik-nsk
              dik-nsk April 6 2018 08: 07
              +1
              young man, teach your wife to cook cabbage soup, are you on an open resource, and not in private conversation, fershtein? the comment is not sneaky, it is a sarcasm for a rash post in the spirit of Urya, made by you even not bothering to understand (find out) the essence of the subject under discussion .. "why? And so it will come down"
              I have the honor hi
          2. svp67
            svp67 April 6 2018 07: 36
            0
            Quote: dik-nsk
            Well, why are you so cruel, here's how now people shout "mattresses all bought," without understanding the question?

            It may still first think and analyze the information will begin ...
        2. Spartanez300
          Spartanez300 April 6 2018 07: 08
          +1
          If this organization works only for the sake of the West and unilaterally, then what is the point of finding our specialists there request .
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 6 2018 06: 51
    +6
    Here the principle clearly applies - "What is supposed to Jupiter is not allowed to Bull." Almost all international organizations play on the side of the Anglo-Saxons. And from this pokand no where to go.
    1. 210ox
      210ox April 6 2018 06: 53
      +3
      It’s a shame .. There’s nothing to let them here at all. We have been made guilty of everything, and we, as before, throw beads in front of the pigs ..
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Here the principle clearly applies - "What is supposed to Jupiter is not allowed to Bull." Almost all international organizations play on the side of the Anglo-Saxons. And from this pokand no where to go.
    2. svp67
      svp67 April 6 2018 06: 57
      +3
      Quote: rotmistr60
      . Almost all international organizations play on the side of the Anglo-Saxons. And from this, there’s nowhere to go.

      But I do not agree. We ourselves have surrendered our positions and are now getting a slap in the face because of this. It’s easy to lose, but it will be very difficult to restore, and for this it is necessary to pursue an ACTIVE policy in this matter, fending off “position, for positions”, moving from “milestone to milestone”
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter April 6 2018 07: 26
        +2
        Sergei hi
        Quote: svp67
        We ourselves have surrendered our positions and are now getting a slap in the face because of this. It’s easy to lose, but it will be very difficult to restore, and for this it is necessary to pursue an ACTIVE policy in this matter, fending off “position, for positions”, moving from “milestone to milestone”

        I subscribe to every word! soldier
        1. svp67
          svp67 April 6 2018 07: 42
          +1
          hi
          Good afternoon. Are you not afraid that the “British scientists” will suddenly find a Belarusian root in “Nofichka”?
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter April 6 2018 07: 45
            +2
            No I'm not afraid . It surprises me why this has still not happened.
            1. svp67
              svp67 April 6 2018 09: 34
              +1
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              No I'm not afraid ..

              Well, right. We are not theirs, but they should be afraid of us, since CRIVDA was always afraid of the TRUTH
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter April 6 2018 09: 41
                +3
                Quote: svp67
                CRIVDA was always afraid of the truth

                How not to remember:
                1. u1977020556
                  u1977020556 April 6 2018 12: 44
                  +1
                  Bodrova is very sorry, I watched more than 10000 films and saw in only two that which I, the Slav, was really expensive. All the rest is anti-Slavic clowning or veiled advertising for explicit oligophrenics. Somehow suspiciously, in the Russian state, Russians are uncomfortable and for a very long time.
    3. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose April 6 2018 07: 22
      +3
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Here the principle clearly applies - "What is supposed to Jupiter is not allowed to Bull." Almost all international organizations play on the side of the Anglo-Saxons. And from this, there’s nowhere to go.

      But does it make sense for us to interfere with inspections and make noise about this? Let them check. What will they find there? Part of the body from a dead donkey (ears at best). I believe that Russia went to the destruction of its chemical weapons because it does not consider its use as an effective means of destruction in local and global conflicts. NW is much more efficient and convenient to use, safer to store and more difficult to distribute. And the world community on nuclear weapons is much less excited than on nuclear weapons. And the fact that the nuclear weapons systems have not yet been destroyed, gives us a reason to "dynamize" questions about nuclear disarmament. Somehow: at the next blah-blah-blah-meeting with the p-sami, the need for nuclear disarmament can always be stated: "Well, when you destroy your own chemical weapons, then we'll talk about nuclear."
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 April 6 2018 07: 36
        +1
        For the "chemists" and talk about nothing. There are no weapons of this type and not here.
        Not for the sake of praising the "partners" is being done, there is simply nothing to talk about on this topic!
        A nosed Englishwoman will spoil anyone, sho now, can you agree on nothing at all?
        On the ground, and so enough any muck accumulated, at least this will be less!
        1. svp67
          svp67 April 6 2018 07: 46
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          There are no weapons of this type and not here.

          But why not, weapons of this type EXIST. In the United States, there are still reserves of binary nerve agents of the nerve type “VX”
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 April 6 2018 09: 25
            +1
            Under the contract must be destroyed. Yankees pull the cat by the tail. as with weapons grade plutonium.
            Ours succeeded here and there. Is this a plus or minus?
            This is government policy .... some kind of agreement is still being respected. and which bolts they put on.
            Those. give up everything? And will we do it again? But can we, ali again, put people on “bread and water”?
            Striped still those goat ... but at least there is a chance that they will clean up their arsenals!
            1. svp67
              svp67 April 6 2018 09: 38
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              Is this a plus or minus?

              With respect to OWL explicit +. We still had stocks of military time, including trophy ones. They are no longer enemies, but we were in danger. If God forbid, then, with the current development of the chemical industry, this muck can be released on a completely different basis and can be done quite quickly.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 April 6 2018 10: 32
                +1
                It was such a thing, ammunition for "donkey" with colored stripes, however, ours are the same, only bigger, for BM.
      2. svp67
        svp67 April 6 2018 09: 36
        +1
        Quote: Polite Elk
        But does it make sense for us to interfere with inspections and make noise about this?

        Sorry, but everything should be in moderation. And if we are ready to give them something, then SIMULTANEOUSLY and they must show us something, at our request. What would it not be unilaterally
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 April 6 2018 10: 34
          +1
          And here is the imbalance. Consider, they do not want to show anything and for nothing to answer the identity!
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer April 6 2018 06: 54
    0
    We are, as always ... Why should we observe anything at all in this political situation?! Mattress covers under the Open Skies program, our planes are not allowed in, and we accept all kinds of commissions for secret objects! The Pro agreement has been violated, so we can safely deploy radars and missiles in Cuba! And how many more such examples?! In the modern world, honesty and kindness have long been mistaken for cowardice and weakness .. it's time to understand this
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 6 2018 06: 55
    +3
    We looked, made sure ... and remained in our opinion. And the opinion should be the same as that of the owner. bully
  5. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii April 6 2018 06: 57
    +5
    All these "surveys" touched this for the future, they say they found this and that and why they didn’t make it public, but for objectivity and reliability they checked it repeatedly, they said they did not believe their noses and eyes.
  6. bald
    bald April 6 2018 07: 08
    +1
    What a babble - checks. Which state will allow, hell knows who, to classified objects and what only a certain circle is involved in it is known. Official window dressing.
  7. Hagalaz
    Hagalaz April 6 2018 07: 42
    0
    But honestly, it would be necessary to appoint a moment to start checks on the last destroyer.
  8. Vard
    Vard April 6 2018 08: 18
    +2
    And what we want ... to be respected ... it won’t happen ... until we do it ourselves ... Do you want to conduct an inspection ... for God's sake ... but only in exchange for a similar one ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 6 2018 12: 55
      +1
      Yes, they spend in general, only they come to us wherever they want, we go to them where they will let us go! Here is such arithmetic!
  9. K-50
    K-50 April 6 2018 10: 11
    +1
    if the OPCW inspects facilities in Russia, then why the commission of this organization for the whole year since the incident in Syrian Khan Sheikhun never bothered to get to this city? But blame the "Assad regime" and the government troops of the SAR rushed at lightning speed - exactly the same as today, London is groundlessly accusing Russia of the situation with the Skripals.

    All such "organizations" located in the west and under constant "democratic" pressure are the "corrupt defectives" where they live under that. sad
    Take at least the same UN. How many times did it happen that the leaders of the state, who must attend the UN meeting, did not give a visa to Matrasia and the UN was silent about this "in a rag", because it is based in Matrasia.
    Yes, and all Western international organizations are corrupt, because the bulk of their “servants” under the jurisdiction of the laws there and any unwanted will easily send an article. An example with the previous head of the IMF is evident. No one is immune from the dictatorship of pin dosniks or little british.
    Therefore, the whole essence of such organizations is deposed even in the formation and selection of a "location".
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 6 2018 12: 53
      +1
      Normal Aglitsky practice who is not with us that corpse! It was like this, with the UN that’s the main identity, they didn’t find the end, what to do .... however, who was looking for it?
  10. u1977020556
    u1977020556 April 6 2018 12: 49
    0
    Military power + economic vulnerability = enemy commission filed the country's defense
    Enemy commission + state traitors = loss of military technology and ability to effectively resist.
    Enemy commission + kick in the ass = very "good" and profitable relations with the Euro-USA, a desire to cooperate with us and a lot of a lot of misconduct))
  11. iouris
    iouris April 6 2018 13: 14
    0
    Why does the Russian Federation spend money and other resources to comply with treaties that are not valid?
  12. flanker7
    flanker7 April 6 2018 20: 46
    0
    In the photo, a shot to a tank gun, not at all ....
  13. VOENOBOZ
    VOENOBOZ April 7 2018 22: 57
    0
    By and large, it’s good that we destroyed chemical weapons, practically protected ourselves from another dangerous threat on our territory. And the adversary can be obtained by other means.