Military Review

Cover Moscow from a nuclear strike! Interceptor missile PRS-1M / 53Т6М hit another target

69
The process of updating the strategic missile defense, covering Moscow and the central industrial region from a nuclear missile strike, continues. As part of an extensive and complex program, various works are carried out on the construction and testing of modernized or new defense components. The other day a regular test of a promising missile, designed to protect vital objects from enemy missiles, took place. As reported, the interceptor missile successfully destroyed the conventional target and showed the required capabilities.


On the morning of April 2, the Department of Information and Mass Communications of the Ministry of Defense of Russia published an official announcement of the recent tests of a new Russian anti-missile. As indicated in a short note, the combat crew of air and missile defense forces of aerospace forces successfully conducted another test launch of a new missile for a strategic missile defense. The tests took place at the Sary-Shagan test site, the main site for such events.


Preparations for the November trial run


Upon completion of the tests, the deputy commander of the air defense and missile defense system of the aerospace forces, Major General Andrei Prikhodko, stated that the upgraded antimissile system had successfully hit a conventional ballistic target. The set test problem was solved at the set time.

The press service of the Ministry of Defense also recalled the goals and objectives of the new project. It is indicated that the missile defense system is in service with the VKS and is designed to protect the capital from attacks using aerospace attacks. In addition, a complex system that includes a lot of different systems and tools is used to monitor outer space and to prevent rocket attacks from third countries.

It should be noted that this is the second test launch of the upgraded antimissile, held this year. If we take the last few months, starting with the fall of 2017, the recent start is the third in the current test program. According to official reports, the first trial launch of the current program took place on November 23 2017. The next start was made only a few weeks ago - February 12. It was reported that in both cases the interceptor missile successfully completed the task and destroyed the training target.


Container loading into the mine


Such moments were not specified in official reports of the Department of Information of the Ministry of Defense, but it is known that in recent months an updated version of an already existing anti-missile missile, known as PRS-1М and 53Т6М, is in flight tests. Also, the profile resources report that the site №35 of the Sary-Shagan test site was selected for the ongoing tests, and the launches are provided with the multichannel shooting complex 5ЖXNNUMP "Amur-P".

According to known data, the current project for the development and testing of a promising missile, ORS-1M, is part of a larger program to modernize the national missile defense system. Since the beginning of the nineties, combat duty to protect Moscow and the nearby region has been carried out by the anti-missile system А-235, also known as RTC-181М and "Samolet-M". It consists of various ground-based technical means and a set of interceptor missiles. In the base configuration of this system, the near-level interception echelon was based on the PRS-1 / 53Т6 rocket. The aim of the current work is to re-equip the A-235 system with new missiles.


Product start


For understandable reasons, the defense industry and the military department were not in a hurry to disclose detailed information about the most important project, as a result of which information was published extremely rarely and in limited quantities. Nevertheless, some information about the PRS-1M rocket did get into open access. In addition, certain estimates and assumptions, which are distinguished by sufficient plausibility, have gained some acceptance.

It is known that Novator, an experimental design bureau (Ekaterinburg), which is part of the Almaz-Antey aerospace defense concern, is developing new guided missiles for the Russian strategic missile defense system. The first reports of the development of a completely new or upgraded interceptor missile date back to the middle of the last decade. In the future, the project of such weapons was mentioned several times in certain messages, but without unnecessary details.

At the turn of the decade, it became known that the Almaz-Antey concern is preparing to resume the production of some components of relatively old 53Т6 rockets. In particular, mention was made of plans to produce new solid-fuel engines for such weapons. Even then, there were certain reasons to assume that it was about the production of power plants for the upgraded version of the ORS-1M rocket. It is believed that all these works were related to the expiration of the warranty period for existing missiles ORS-1. The emergence of new batches of engines allowed to retrofit serial missiles and return them on duty.


12 February launch 2018


In December, the 2011 of the year saw the first test launch of an ORS-1 product, equipped with a new series engine, released after production resumed. Probably, then the anti-rocket was tested in its basic configuration, which fully corresponded to the original 53Т6 project. At the same time, versions appeared about testing a new rocket, which is at least a modernized version of the existing one. However, officials did not comment on such assumptions. The events of the following years, in turn, became an indirect confirmation of the fact that in 2011, the main task was to check the engine of the new batch.

Information about testing a promising product, officially called the "new modernized rocket", appeared only last fall. As reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense, on November 23, 2017, a test launch of such an antimissile took place. The command noted that the launch was successful and ended with the interception of the training target. The type of product used in the tests, however, was not specified. However, in the video from the Ministry of Defense it was possible to notice that the 53Т6М index was present on the transport and launch container of the test rocket.

12 February 2018, one of the sites of the Sary-Shagan test site, was again used to test the launch of the “new upgraded missile”. According to A. Prikhodko, then still having the title of colonel, the product completed the task and struck a conventional goal. In this case, the interceptor missile showed a given accuracy. In just a few weeks, another test launch took place, which ended with the destruction of a third target that imitated enemy weapons. Now official statements indicated successful defeat of the target at a given time.


The anti-missile flies to the conditional goal


Apparently, the concern VKO "Almaz-Antey" and the Ministry of Defense will have to continue testing new missiles. After several test launches with an attack of training objectives, such weapons will be able to receive a recommendation for adoption. A corresponding order and a new order for full-scale mass production will follow. As a result, over the next few years, Moscow’s strategic missile defense system will noticeably upgrade its means of intercepting the near-echelon.

The 53T6М / PRS-1М project, as well as the entire A-235 / Samolet-M program, is of particular importance for the country's defense and strategic security. For this reason, most of the information about it has not yet been announced by official sources. The Ministry of Defense regularly reports on the conduct of certain works, publishes photographs and video filming of various processes, including the launch of rockets, but certain data is kept secret. As a result, there are quite a few versions that describe the technical appearance and characteristics of advanced anti-missile weapons. Which of them are true - is still unknown.

It is known that the PRS-1M rocket, like its predecessor, consists of the starting and marching stages. Assembled product has the shape of a cone with some protruding elements. To obtain the highest possible flight data, both stages are equipped with solid-propellant rocket engines using modern blend fuel. The rocket comes from the factory in a cylindrical transport and launch container. Together with him, she is transported to the place of duty and is loaded into the silo launcher.


The third start of the experienced PRS-1M


According to well-known estimates, the anti-missile 53Т6М maintains the time-tested principles of operation. Her guidance is carried out by commands from the ground. The ground components of the A-235 ABM system monitor the movements of the ballistic target and the rocket, while simultaneously calculating and transmitting commands for the latter. The target is hit with a special warhead, the relatively high power of which compensates for a possible miss. According to some reports, 53Т6М missiles or the like in theory can carry conventional warheads.

Having sufficiently high characteristics, the products PRS-1 and PRS-1М are not distinguished by their large size and weight. The length of such antimissiles together with the container does not exceed 12 m. The diameter of the TPK is no more than 2 m. The launch weight is less than 10 tons. The loading and loading machines based on the MZKT four-axle chassis work with the 53Т6 missiles. At the same time, the relatively large length of the product led to the need to supplement the cargo platform with the removed elements. Also developed a wheel semi-trailer with mounts and means of loading TPK in the launch shaft.

Accurate information about the flight data of the "new modernized" domestic interceptor missile has not yet been officially announced. According to some reports, it develops a speed of at least 4-5 km / s. The firing range, according to various estimates, reaches 100 km, the maximum height is up to 40-50 km. Due to the highest flight speed, the time to intercept the target is reduced to the minimum possible values. A flight to the maximum range takes a few seconds.


Rapid acceleration is provided by a high-powered engine leaving remarkable puffs of smoke.


It should be noted that the intercept zone of the PRS-1M missile is not large. The fact is that such an anti-missile must be used in conjunction with other products of its class that have different flight characteristics. With the help of two or three interceptor missiles with different parameters, the A-235 system creates a layered defense for a fairly large area.

It allows you to intercept dangerous objects at distances up to 1000-1500 km and at altitudes up to several hundred kilometers. The task of the near echelon of the missile defense system represented by the 53Т6 / 53Т6М products, in this case, is the interception of single targets that have managed to break through the zone of responsibility of other missiles. This architecture of the missile defense system makes it possible to obtain a sufficiently high potential and to minimize its probability of successful breakthrough.

Over the past few years, a number of leading enterprises of the Russian defense industry have been working on the modernization of the existing strategic missile defense system. One of the main ways to upgrade it is to upgrade one of the existing missiles, aimed at improving its technical and combat characteristics. This project, known by the 53Т6М index, reached the testing stage last year, and so far three test launches have been completed. Apparently, similar events will be held in the future. At the same time, it should be remembered that the date when the missile was put into service and its subsequent putting on duty is approaching with each new test launch.

On the materials of the sites:
https://function.mil.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://tass.ru/
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-354.html
The first tests of the 53Т6М / PRS-1М rocket:


Second tests:


Third trials:
Author:
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard April 5 2018 05: 50
    +2
    One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I April 5 2018 06: 23
      +1
      Quote: Vard
      One annoying ... I do not live in Moscow.

      And in which Moscow do you live? ... In the "Old" or "New"? wink I ento to what maybe you should not worry? Wait a bit ... when your city becomes the "Moscow Quarter"! yes
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather April 5 2018 06: 26
      +4
      It allows you to intercept dangerous objects at ranges up to 1000-1500 km and at altitudes up to several hundred kilometers
      . impressive damn it!
      Quote: Vard
      one annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

      buddy, you can’t cover the whole country, you understand, such missiles are not of continuous assembly and are not worth a penny, but you need to keep the “head” in any case, without command only the “perimeter” will remain working ...
      1. Bastinda
        Bastinda April 5 2018 07: 10
        0
        buddy, you don’t cover the whole country, you understand

        Yes, I agree. But this is a little annoying:
        The target is struck with the help of a special warhead, whose relatively large power compensates for a possible miss.

        Where it is interesting precipitation will be?
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather April 5 2018 07: 13
          +4
          Quote: Bastinda
          buddy, you don’t cover the whole country, you understand

          Yes, I agree. But this is a little annoying:
          The target is struck with the help of a special warhead, whose relatively large power compensates for a possible miss.

          Where it is interesting precipitation will be?

          depending on what height the interception will take place if there is no precipitation in the stratosphere, And then, what to grieve for: precipitation, or a warhead that can fly? then do not care precipitation ...
          1. Bastinda
            Bastinda April 5 2018 07: 16
            +3
            Well, if you choose, between a warhead in the Rublevka, Barvikha area and radioactive fallout over my city ... I believe many will make the right choice! laughing
            1. svd-xnumx
              svd-xnumx April 5 2018 19: 54
              0
              Well, if you choose, between a warhead in the Rublevka, Barvikha area and radioactive fallout over my city ... I believe many will make the right choice!
              And this is where the wind will blow, in Chernobyl a ground explosion was carried away hundreds of kilometers away, and from a height of tens of kilometers under the accompanying meteorological conditions, radioactive fallout could fall to the same Moscow. Well, this is not the first nuclear attack damaging factor.
          2. milling machine
            milling machine April 5 2018 08: 16
            0
            Quote: Dead Day
            Quote: Bastinda
            buddy, you don’t cover the whole country, you understand

            Yes, I agree. But this is a little annoying:
            The target is struck with the help of a special warhead, whose relatively large power compensates for a possible miss.

            Where it is interesting precipitation will be?

            depending on what height the interception will take place if there is no precipitation in the stratosphere, And then, what to grieve for: precipitation, or a warhead that can fly? then do not care precipitation ...

            Undermining the special warhead and such a light on the radar pro that other warheads will no longer be visible. So this is an extreme case, because a massive blow can no longer be intercepted.
            Another thing is strange to me, the article indicates the mass of the rocket in the region of 10 tons, while the Amer’s Sm3 of the last block weighs a little more than 2 tons. Yes, I understand that they will throw a Czech interception, but still the difference in mass and dimensions is huge. Well, it can’t be ours from solid cast iron.
            1. Hole puncher
              Hole puncher April 5 2018 08: 58
              +1
              Quote: frezer
              Yes, I understand that they will throw a Czech interception, but still the difference in mass and dimensions is huge. Well, it can’t be ours from solid cast iron.

              A large mass of warheads requires more fuel for delivery, you can still joke about the biggest chips ...
              1. sivuch
                sivuch April 6 2018 11: 32
                +1
                special warhead does not weigh so much. It’s another matter if there is still an OF.
                I hope it doesn’t reach verification
            2. neri73-r
              neri73-r April 5 2018 09: 25
              +2
              Quote: frezer
              Another thing is strange to me, the article indicates the mass of the rocket in the region of 10 tons, while the Amer’s Sm3 of the last block weighs a little more than 2 tons. Yes, I understand that they will throw a Czech interception, but still the difference in mass and dimensions is huge. Well, it can’t be ours from solid cast iron.

              Well, so they have speed, if I am not mistaken, completely different, as well as other parameters!
      2. Cherry Nine
        Cherry Nine April 5 2018 08: 21
        +3
        Quote: Dead Day
        impressive damn it

        Not really. The number 1500 is theoretically possible for a control system. The existence of missiles capable of realizing it is not known.
        Quote: Vard
        One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

        Just in this case - this is a plus. High-altitude explosion
        1. In clear weather, it will do more work than a low-power anti-bunker Buruzui warhead.
        2. Guaranteed to disable radars for some time. This means that the second batch of democracy will pass without problems.
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 5 2018 12: 27
        +2
        Quote: Dead Day
        you don’t cover the whole country, you know, such missiles are not in-line assembly, and they’re not worth a penny,

        For this, the economy option-S-500, so to say, is done for cities and objects throughout Russia. The modernization of Amur is the right thing ... but I would say that Nudol is essentially a new missile defense.
        Initially, the A-235 missile defense system was planned in three echelons: the long-range echelon with missile defense A-925 missiles, the middle echelon - the 58P6 firing complex, the near echelon - PRS-1M missiles (the result of the modernization of PRS-1 missiles). In the modified A-235 anti-ballistic and anti-space defense system, it is planned to use two-stage anti-missiles with a high-explosive fragmentation and nuclear warhead, providing it with the ability to shoot down hypersonic attack weapons, ballistic missiles and their warheads, as well as satellites in low space
      4. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 5 2018 14: 47
        +3
        When I served, the interception range was 300 km.
      5. Kalmar
        Kalmar April 5 2018 22: 11
        0
        "head" needs to be saved anyway

        Of course, I am not an expert, but from one head there is somehow little use. If I were an imperialist predator, first of all I would irrigate democracy with the most important objects for the economy: oil and gas, seaports, large industrial enterprises, etc. And after that you can even capitulate calmly: one enemy FIG (we mean) will put his teeth on the shelf in the near future.
        1. Cherry Nine
          Cherry Nine April 6 2018 08: 41
          0
          Quote: Kalmar
          oil and gas, seaports, large industrial enterprises

          Nice try, but no.
          For the measures proposed by you, nuclear weapons are not required. All this, especially pipelines, is easiest to close on the side that is partly being done.
          And there are only two scenarios for global impact:
          1. Counterforce - on the objects of strategic nuclear forces.
          2. The blow of retaliation - in the cities.
          Moreover, for the first scenario, nuclear weapons really need a lot, and intelligence should work very clearly. It is considered only by Americans. No one else, including the Russian Federation, can handle this now.
        2. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 6 2018 17: 43
          0
          The imperialist predators there did already about 15 years ago: they redirected their ICBMs from cities to prom. and energy infrastructure.
          1. Cherry Nine
            Cherry Nine April 6 2018 17: 47
            0
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The imperialist predators there did already 15 years ago

            Why do you think so? Not very up to date, but it seems that under existing treaties, missiles in peacetime should be aimed "at milk"
            1. freejack
              freejack 2 May 2018 21: 54
              0
              Why do you think so?


              He took it from Obama’s open speech (he’s the “kindest” Nob. Lowriat of the world). I also heard this statement. Like, the United States, because of its innate kindness and humanity, redirected all nuclear warheads from Russian cities to infrastructure. They even calculated that there would be few casualties: 2-3 million. For a dermocrat, a dove of peace, a couple of millionaires of Russians is dust! ... ( negative
      6. zenion
        zenion 13 May 2018 17: 14
        0
        Wow! I remember that while working at the factory, no one said what was being done, everything was a product.
    3. Ascetic
      Ascetic April 5 2018 12: 19
      +3
      Quote: Vard
      One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

      In addition to Moscow, the Central Development Commission includes 15 more regions, and with the adoption of the S-500, the capabilities of the Strategic Missile Defense will increase significantly, including in terms of covering other strategically important areas .. And if you talk like that, it’s better to live in an area that is not a potential target for application ROW.
    4. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener April 5 2018 14: 40
      +1
      Do not strain. This system will not protect against a massive blow.
    5. Yak28
      Yak28 April 5 2018 17: 53
      0
      But I live, and a lot of things bother me besides US nuclear missiles wink
    6. Setrac
      Setrac April 5 2018 20: 02
      +1
      Quote: Vard
      One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

      Let it not bother you, let Muscovites strain. With all the degree of security, Moscow will be replaced anyway, they will not regret the warheads on it. But if you live in some kind of Hlyuposranke - your chances of survival in a nuclear war are very high.
      1. Click
        Click April 5 2018 20: 42
        0
        In Magnitogorsk, I feel unwell ... request
  2. Hole puncher
    Hole puncher April 5 2018 08: 53
    +3
    The author is somewhat wrong, conditional goals are struck, not physical ones. That is, a hypothetically certain point in space in which the target is conditionally located. There were no tests for real purposes. Predicting objections: it is necessary to convert a ballistic missile into a target rocket, assign it its own index, conduct tests notifying "probably the enemy" that this target rocket does not fall under the INF Treaty. After notifying him that this is a training launch, so that the SPRN “probably the enemy” would not present this as an attack.
    Those. it is impossible to hide the missile defense test against a real target, and if they say that the target is conditional, then it was.
  3. Snakebyte
    Snakebyte April 5 2018 09: 31
    +1
    Does secrecy not allow you to shoot a defeat of a target?
    1. Hole puncher
      Hole puncher April 5 2018 09: 33
      +2
      Conditional goal, what is there to shoot?
      1. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte April 5 2018 09: 38
        +2
        That is, there was no interception of a real target.
        In a recent discussion, the patriots blamed the Americans that their missile defense during the tests hit the target with previously known parameters, which means their missile defense is ineffective.
        But the domestic missile defense, it turns out, didn’t intercept anything at all. However, it seems that soon it will be adopted.
        1. Hole puncher
          Hole puncher April 5 2018 11: 07
          +1
          So she doesn’t have to intercept anyone, so for the species there is, but there is no sense from her. If Muscovites do not suffer from a nuclear strike, they will all the same disappear from the cold, hunger and radiation.
        2. Ascetic
          Ascetic April 5 2018 12: 44
          +3
          In Soviet times, exercises were conducted with real interception of BR
          One of the tests of the system took place on 18.06.1982/5/60 as part of the largest exercises of the Armed Forces of the USSR. Two PR systems 15ZH45P launched from the “A” range intercepted the RSD-10 BRZD 29ZhXNUMX RK-XNUMX launched from the Kapustin Yar range and one R-XNUMX SLBM from the Delta class nuclear submarine.
          1. Hole puncher
            Hole puncher April 5 2018 14: 18
            +2
            So who interferes with real tests now, each year Topol is written off for disposal.
          2. Cherry Nine
            Cherry Nine April 5 2018 15: 43
            +1
            Quote: Ascetic
            exercises were carried out with real interception of BR

            The BR there was real (i.e. blank), and interception conditional. There was no real explosion of a nuclear warhead missile. That is, the anti-missile missile reportedly passed at such a distance from the target that an explosion of a nuclear warhead missile would most likely incapacitate a warhead.
            1. Hole puncher
              Hole puncher April 6 2018 04: 04
              0
              They wrote a conditional goal. Yes and no MO missile targets for missile defense tests
              1. Cherry Nine
                Cherry Nine April 6 2018 08: 31
                0
                Quote: Puncher
                They wrote a conditional goal.

                I'm talking about the 82nd year.
  4. Vadim237
    Vadim237 April 5 2018 09: 59
    +1
    "It allows you to intercept dangerous objects at ranges up to 1000-1500 km and at altitudes up to several hundred kilometers." - Only there are no such missiles around Moscow - 120 53T6 missiles are the whole missile defense system of Russia.
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic April 5 2018 12: 38
      +4
      Quote: Vadim237
      But there are no such missiles around Moscow - 120 53T6 missiles are the whole Russian missile defense system.

      Where did 120 missiles come from? No new mines will be put, all upgraded missiles will be placed in old mines, including those being mothballed. If they are of course.
      Currently, 68 launchers are deployed around Moscow (according to domestic data), starting positions are located near the settlements of Lytkarino (16 launchers), Skhodnya (16 launchers), Korolev (12 launchers), Vnukovo (12 launchers) and Sofrino (12 launchers) .This is a short-range intercept missile with warhead similar to the S-300. Another 32 mines for long-range intercept missiles were mothballed, under a missile defense agreement, more than 100PU should not be deployed in a positional area.
      Since 2008, a unified air defense and missile defense system has been created in Russia and the CIS, designed to combine the management and exchange of information between different systems. In fact, the border between the tactical and strategic missile defense of Russia will be erased within the framework of the integrated system
      The concept of a new unified system involves the creation of a multilayer missile defense. It will include short-range complexes "Tunguska", "Tor-M2" and "Shell-C1" and medium and long-range S-300, S-400 and from 2020 - S-500. Currently, all of the above systems form the military and object air defense, but formally belong to the tactical missile defense of Russia. The upper "layer" of the unified Russian missile defense, obviously, will be the A-235.
  5. san4es
    san4es April 5 2018 10: 38
    +2

    hi Rocket 53T6
    Design - housing type - bearing cone; the casing is made of high-strength steels using winding made of composite materials with solidly shaped conical charges of solid fuel of a specific shape. According to Balancer, the missile body is made of titanium and has a ceramic tip. A detachable stage with a start-accelerating solid propellant rocket engine, a detachable combat stage - controlled warhead with gas-dynamic steering engines, directed perpendicular to the axis of the rocket. Gas-dynamic rocket launch on its own engine.
    Weight - 9693 kg
    Fuel weight - 7625 kg
    Weight of MS - 500-700 kg (estimated)
    Warhead mass - 150 kg (estimated)
    Range:
    - 80-100 km
    - 20.8 km (range launches 53T6)
    Damage height:
    - 5000-30000 m
    - 14000 m (range launches 53T6)
    Speed:
    - 10-14 M (according to one data)
    - 5200-5500 m / s (according to other data)
    - 4000 m / s (according to other data)
    - up to 3600 m / s (source - Russian Shield)
    Rate of climb - 30000 m height per 5-6 s
    Acceleration to maximum speed - 3-4 s (according to various sources)
    The exit time from the mine from the moment of launch is 0.2-0.4 s
    Maximum overloads:
    - 210G longitudinal
    - 90 G transverse
    Missile deflection angle after launch - up to 70 degrees
    Guaranteed shelf life is at least 10 years, possibly with an extension of up to 15-20 years based on the results of additional tests and improvements. Types of warheads:
    - nuclear warhead with AA-84 warhead with a capacity of 10 kt.
    - a fragmentation warhead of a directional type with active destructive elements-fragments weighing 15 grams of 5-6 fragments per 1 sq.m. soldier
    Transport and installation machine 77YU6 and TPK
  6. Reader 2013
    Reader 2013 April 5 2018 10: 56
    +2
    And here the headline "cover Moscow" to Moscow in any situation is over, they would have written honestly, to cover the bunkers and assholes of the leadership
  7. dnestr74
    dnestr74 April 5 2018 11: 14
    0
    I would like not only to Moscow, but all millionaire cities to reliably cover.
  8. Old26
    Old26 April 5 2018 11: 19
    +3
    Quote: Vadim237
    "It allows you to intercept dangerous objects at ranges up to 1000-1500 km and at altitudes up to several hundred kilometers." - Only there are no such missiles around Moscow - 120 53T6 missiles are the whole missile defense system of Russia.

    Vadim! Where did 120 missiles come from? In the Moscow missile defense zone, 100 launchers were deployed. 32 with interceptors 51T6 and 68 with interceptors 53T6. Where is 120 ??
    1. Cherry Nine
      Cherry Nine April 5 2018 14: 50
      0
      Quote: Old26
      32 with interceptors 51T6

      It seems like they’ve already written off, no?
  9. Falcon5555
    Falcon5555 April 5 2018 11: 31
    +2
    When I see all these “should be noted” and other verbal garbage, then I immediately understand that the article was written by “Ryabov Kirill”.
    And how does this rocket take off? .. How the hellish power! How a bullet flies away!
  10. Dmitry Grishin
    Dmitry Grishin April 5 2018 15: 47
    0
    Wow, guys !!!) And let it not be all right in other sectors, but every day I start to believe and make sure that I live in a country that will definitely protect its citizens)
    1. Reader 2013
      Reader 2013 April 5 2018 22: 31
      0
      Go to the news, in this section for your nonsense they will not put pluses
  11. Old26
    Old26 April 5 2018 15: 59
    0
    Quote: Cherry Nine
    Quote: Old26
    32 with interceptors 51T6

    It seems like they’ve already written off, no?

    Copied. I gave them as an example of the ratio of interceptors 51T6 and 53T6
  12. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim April 5 2018 17: 47
    +1
    Quote: Vard
    One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

    Relax.
    In the “best” years, flight missions for hitting Moscow were introduced into 60 warheads.
  13. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion April 6 2018 16: 21
    +1
    Quote: Bastinda
    buddy, you don’t cover the whole country, you understand

    Yes, I agree. But this is a little annoying:
    The target is struck with the help of a special warhead, whose relatively large power compensates for a possible miss.

    Where it is interesting precipitation will be?


    With a high-altitude nuclear explosion, REM is absent.

    Quote: svd-xnumx
    Well, if you choose, between a warhead in the Rublevka, Barvikha area and radioactive fallout over my city ... I believe many will make the right choice!
    And this is where the wind will blow, in Chernobyl a ground explosion was carried away hundreds of kilometers away, and from a height of tens of kilometers under the accompanying meteorological conditions, radioactive fallout could fall to the same Moscow. Well, this is not the first nuclear attack damaging factor.


    Do not compare ground and high-altitude explosions. With a ground explosion, REM is maximum, with a high-altitude explosion it is absent.

    Quote: Dead Day
    Quote: Bastinda
    buddy, you don’t cover the whole country, you understand

    Yes, I agree. But this is a little annoying:
    The target is struck with the help of a special warhead, whose relatively large power compensates for a possible miss.

    Where it is interesting precipitation will be?

    depending on what height the interception will take place if there is no precipitation in the stratosphere, And then, what to grieve for: precipitation, or a warhead that can fly? then do not care precipitation ...


    With an explosion above 15 km, precipitation can no longer be thought of.

    Quote: Cherry Nine
    Quote: Dead Day
    impressive damn it

    Not really. The number 1500 is theoretically possible for a control system. The existence of missiles capable of realizing it is not known.
    Quote: Vard
    One annoying ... I live not in Moscow ...

    Just in this case - this is a plus. High-altitude explosion
    1. In clear weather, it will do more work than a low-power anti-bunker Buruzui warhead.
    2. Guaranteed to disable radars for some time. This means that the second batch of democracy will pass without problems.


    1. What will she do? With a high-altitude nuclear explosion, people will not have anything on earth. The maximum temporary blinding due to a burn of the cornea is for those who decide to admire the fireworks without goggles. The problems will be with aircraft and satellites that will be in radius of destruction. They are guaranteed to fail.
    2. Do not exaggerate. Basically there will be problems with radio communications in short waves. On other waves, temporary interruptions from several seconds to several minutes are possible. Of course, everything will depend on the height and power of the explosion. In one test in the USSR, there were problems at all frequencies in the radius 500 km in an hour. But then a megaton warhead was blown up over the Semipalatinsk test site. More dangerous is EMP. There will be many problems from it. In high-altitude nuclear explosions, the radius of destruction of EMP can reach up to a thousand km. And in high-altitude nuclear tests in the 60s Over the years, problems with power supply were recorded within a radius of 1300 km. Of course, this does not mean that all electronics will fail. Only one that does not have protection against severe voltage surges. And even simple grounding, lightning rods, fuses can significantly reduce the effects of electromagnetic radiation.
    1. Cherry Nine
      Cherry Nine April 6 2018 18: 42
      0
      Quote: Xscorpion
      What will she do? With a high-altitude nuclear explosion, people on earth will not have anything. The maximum temporary blinding due to a burn of the cornea is for those who decide to admire the fireworks without protective glasses.

      Depends on the specific parameters. Warhead 51T6, they say, is more than 1 Mt (possibly up to 3) 53T6 - 10 Kt, the minimum interception height is 70 and 5 km, respectively.
      In the first case (at 1 Mt), the zone of medium damage (5psi) with a radius of 7 km, burns 3 km 14 km. 1M + dead, 3M + wounded at the epicenter in the center of Moscow.
      In the second case, the dead and injured are 50K + and 200K +, respectively.
      If the explosions occur at the maximum altitude - 670 and 45 km, respectively - then yes, not so bad.
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Do not exaggerate. Mostly there will be problems with radio communications.

      Interested in a period of a few seconds before the arrival of the warheads of the next missile. As a matter of fact, this is the main problem with nuclear warhead missile defense, which forced the Americans to switch to that hit.
    2. Reader 2013
      Reader 2013 April 6 2018 20: 58
      0
      1. What will she do? With a high-altitude nuclear explosion, people on earth will not have anything. The maximum temporary blinding due to a burn of the cornea is for those who decide to admire the fireworks without protective glasses.
      Yes bullshit question put on black glasses caps from precipitation and went about their business
  14. Fedor egoist
    Fedor egoist April 7 2018 17: 35
    +1
    A missile defense system around Moscow and the central missile defense center is not created for absolute protection, but to win 10-15 minutes to evacuate VIPs in bomb shelters and to an organized response in the style of "the whole world in ruin."
    The best defense against a nuclear missile is the distance from the epicenter. With a certain probability, even a resident of the Moscow Region can survive by hiding in a regular basement. If near (5-10 km) with his house there are no tidy targets for nuclear strikes, of course. In Moscow itself it will be very sad and sad. Metro will not help.
    Residents of million-plus cities and regional centers are better off at the dachas at the beginning. I have bad news for them.
    Residents of rural areas at a great distance from large cities, industrial facilities and mines of the Strategic Missile Forces - wear dark glasses and watch free fireworks.
    1. Cherry Nine
      Cherry Nine April 7 2018 19: 05
      +2
      Quote: Fedor Egoist
      With a certain probability, even a resident of the Moscow region can survive by hiding in an ordinary basement

      You're dramatizing.
      The 10 Mt warheads have passed. Now the most powerful warhead at the disposal of partners is the W88 at 455 (475) Kt, and there are not many of them. Most likely, they will go to the strategic nuclear forces. The rest are 100 and 300 Kt.
      Since the strike in Moscow is thought to be decapitating, the explosions will be ground or low air, with maximum anti-bunker potential. Naturally, the site within the Garden Ring will be completely destroyed, but, on the other hand, the radius of fires and average destruction of a ground explosion of 300 Kt is 3-4 km. That is, the Falout zone will be limited by the TTK, and, for example, Cheryomushki, not to mention Butovo, even a glass-breaking shock wave of 1 psi will not reach.
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 7 2018 19: 13
        +4
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        to, for example, Cheryomushki, not to mention Butovo, even a glass-breaking shock wave of 1 psi will not reach

        Another Vadim237 drew ...
        Young man, remember about the SVR in Yasenevo, for example. As well as other miscellaneous, widely scattered around Moscow, "goodies."
        Moscow, it (contrary to widespread misconception) not only consists of offices and water parks wink
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        ... the zone of Falaut will be limited ...

        Schazz yes
        1. Cherry Nine
          Cherry Nine April 7 2018 21: 54
          0
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          remember about the SVR in Yasenevo, for example.

          Do not like Butovo? )))
          Even if the enemies do not spare the W-76 trident on the SVR, the Dresden zone will end in the Yasenevo metro area, and the broken glass - Konkovo ​​metro (ground explosion). With a ground explosion of the W-87 minitude, the area of ​​broken glass will be limited to m Troparevo - Kaluzhskaya - Tsaritsyno, continuous fires will capture m Prague and Konkovo.
          You see. I am not going to argue that in the event of a nuclear war, Butovo or, conversely, Bibirevo will be a completely safe place. Even without tridents, they are not always pleasant. I only claim that the phrase
          Quote: Fedor Egoist
          Survive with some probability will even resident of the Moscow region, huddled in an ordinary basement

          greatly exaggerates the capabilities of nuclear weapons. A quick and easy death is not to be expected.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 7 2018 22: 33
            +4
            You have extremely idealistic ideas about the stability of the city with external influence on it.
            In a city, for example, it is full of all kinds of aggressive chemistry, from chlorine to ammonia, and it’s quite enough for yourself in commercial quantities. And all this chemistry (inevitably) will also come out.
            Further, you somehow did not notice my remark about
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            other various, widely scattered around Moscow, "goodies"

            , and only in vain did it.
            In Moscow (and the nearest Moscow region, and not only in the nearest one), there are a lot of objects "attracting" the same nuclear weapons.
            Mytishchi, Korolev - this is from what I know well personally. This is for example yes
            Quote: Cherry Nine
            A quick and easy death should not be expected.

            Ahem ... I personally would rather die long, hard ... and soon, if you don't mind laughing
            1. Cherry Nine
              Cherry Nine April 7 2018 23: 16
              0
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              You have extremely idealistic ideas about the stability of the city with external influence on it.

              Not at all.
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              You somehow did not notice my remark about

              I noticed, but did not develop this topic. The conversation would be endless.
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              soon if you do not mind

              And in the sense of attracting nuclear weapons, and in the sense of radioactive fallout, the most trump places are Australia and New Zealand. Do not even happen a nuclear war - you still will not lose)))
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Mytishchi, Korolev - this is from what I know well personally. This is for example

              It is believed that this logic is outdated. Destroying the industrial facilities of present-day Russia with the help of nuclear weapons makes no sense. Cope on their own.
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack April 7 2018 23: 20
                +4
                You said more with one phrase than with the rest ... um, scribble:
                Quote: Cherry Nine
                Destroying the industrial facilities of present-day Russia with the help of nuclear weapons makes no sense. Cope on their own

                It would be softer to say ... ah, here:
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                You have extremely idealistic ideas

                All. You are not interesting for me. With your "considerations" - to Vadim237you’ll sing.
                1. Cherry Nine
                  Cherry Nine April 8 2018 07: 48
                  0
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  Vadim 237, you’ll sing.

                  No idea who it is.
                  Since, judging by a couple of pages of your comments, you almost always sit on the News, (and I almost never go there) frequent communication with you does not threaten me. On the other hand, some of your comments give the impression of a rare adult here. hi

                  By the way, for cucumbers and the year 2000 I will not say, but
                  Cherry Nine
                  7 May 2017 19: 37

                  Quote: Cherry Nine
                  All prices, of course, do not remember
                  Forced to apologize to the user Social Democrat. The memory of the old man (((
                  I found yesterday in Lidl both chocolates at 0.78 (albeit not Milka), and orange juice at 0.59 per liter (albeit an uncomfortable bag without a lid).

                  Just in Stockholm it was)))
      2. Fedor egoist
        Fedor egoist April 10 2018 13: 33
        0
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        You're dramatizing.

        I do not exaggerate. Moscow and the Moscow region are extremely densely packed with objects of a strategic level. Dozens of warheads will go to Moscow alone. In the suburbs - about a hundred more warheads. Intercept up to a third in the best case. Hence my phrase "with some probability." I hope you will not dispute the fact that there is a probability of surviving the moment of exchange of nuclear strikes, and that for a resident of the Moscow Region this probability is significantly lower than 0,5. Especially if there is an ABM system object or one of the reserve command bunkers behind the grove, or even nothing, but thirty years ago there was something.
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        The 10 Mt warheads have passed.

        Fortunately for us, yes. The Americans did not have more than 1Mt of monoblocks, and they are temporarily unable to make new ones. Although monoblocks of high power are a consequence, designed to compensate for the lack of accuracy in early versions of nuclear warheads. In cities, such use was not planned, it is excess capacity. The city will have enough 200-500kt, the rest will be done by fires, chaos and mass panic.
        But for Americans, a monoblock of high power at the bottom of the sea (well, you understand) can be a very unpleasant surprise. Even without the cobalt seasoning, which there most likely will still be.
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        Since the strike in Moscow is conceived as decapitating, the explosions will be ground or low air, with maximum anti-bunker potential.

        Then I agree, the same thoughts. The same picture will be observed in the Moscow Region, at the Strategic Missile Forces, ABM facilities and in some key cities for the military-industrial complex.
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        Naturally, the site within the Garden Ring will be completely destroyed, but, on the other hand, the radius of fires and average destruction of a ground explosion of 300 Kt is 3-4 km. That is, the Falout zone will be limited by the TTK, and, for example, Cheryomushki, not to mention Butovo, even a glass-breaking shock wave of 1 psi will not reach.

        No no and one more time no. The area of ​​Moscow to the Moscow Ring Road is about 1000 sq. Km. To completely make this area a zone of complete destruction, it will take more than a hundred warheads. The objects of special importance are located very unevenly, and if my thoughts on mostly ground-based explosions are correct, then Moscow after an exchange of blows will resemble a piece of Maasdam cheese. Such, with large holes. The main hole is in the center. But the rest will be located without any system, and it makes no sense to talk about whether this or that sleeping area near the Moscow Ring Road will survive. I will not even comment on the phrase about glass.
        A separate topic is survival in the city during the first week after the exchange of nuclear strikes. I am sure that a significant part of the townspeople who survived the explosions will die in the first two days after the start.
  15. Old26
    Old26 April 8 2018 11: 36
    0
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    remember about the SVR in Yasenevo, for example. As well as other miscellaneous, widely scattered around Moscow, "goodies."

    Fortunately, Roman, the times when the adversary was ready to strike at a mass of targets in the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries are a thing of the past. It was in 1980 that Carter, in terms of SIOP-5D, planned to strike at 40 targets in the USSR, VD countries, China, Vietnam, Cuba.
    But after 6 years, in 1986, Reagan had already planned 86 strikes under the SIOP-16000 plan. In 1999, Clinton planned 2260 hits as part of the SIOP plan.
    Now, when the number of BBs has dropped to 1500 thousand, I think that not only "goodies" have left this plan, but also many cities that were previously targets ...
  16. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion April 8 2018 14: 23
    0
    Quote: Cherry Nine
    Quote: Xscorpion
    What will she do? With a high-altitude nuclear explosion, people on earth will not have anything. The maximum temporary blinding due to a burn of the cornea is for those who decide to admire the fireworks without protective glasses.

    Depends on the specific parameters. Warhead 51T6, they say, is more than 1 Mt (possibly up to 3) 53T6 - 10 Kt, the minimum interception height is 70 and 5 km, respectively.
    In the first case (at 1 Mt), the zone of medium damage (5psi) with a radius of 7 km, burns 3 km 14 km. 1M + dead, 3M + wounded at the epicenter in the center of Moscow.
    In the second case, the dead and injured are 50K + and 200K +, respectively.
    If the explosions occur at the maximum altitude - 670 and 45 km, respectively - then yes, not so bad.
    Quote: Xscorpion
    Do not exaggerate. Mostly there will be problems with radio communications.

    Interested in a period of a few seconds before the arrival of the warheads of the next missile. As a matter of fact, this is the main problem with nuclear warhead missile defense, which forced the Americans to switch to that hit.


    Undermining the special missile defense missile defense system will be at an altitude of 60 km approximately. Ideally, it should be so, because at this altitude the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion, in particular light radiation, are maximum and most dangerous for ballistic missiles.
    As for the destruction. In an explosion above 12 km, neither the shock wave, nor the light radiation, nor the penetrating radiation will reach the earth. From the atmosphere, there will be no REE either, since there will be no release of radioactive soil from the earth’s surface. at altitude there is another damaging factor, RZV. That is, radioactive contamination of the air. That is, you will not be allowed to fly on airplanes in this area for several years. So your data on losses are greatly exaggerated. Such damage will be about an explosion of 1Mt at an altitude below 1 km.
    1. Cherry Nine
      Cherry Nine April 8 2018 18: 37
      0
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Undermining the special missile defense missile defense will be at an altitude of 60 km approximately

      51T6 and 53T6 are specific products with specific capabilities, and not "should be so." Moreover, in the 1st case there are doubts about the existence of the product.
      Quote: Xscorpion
      nuclear explosion damaging factors

      Behind the atmosphere and as applied to warheads are neutron flux and x-ray radiation.
      Quote: Xscorpion
      In an explosion above 12 km, neither a shock wave, nor light radiation, nor penetrating radiation will reach the ground.

      Depends on the characteristics of the warhead.
      Quote: Xscorpion
      That is, radioactive contamination of the air. That is, it will be impossible to fly on airplanes in this area for several years

      You are the author of "fiction", I understand correctly?
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Such damage will occur approximately with a 1Mt explosion below 1 km.

      Hmm, you're right about that. I did not keep track of the settings.
      Quote: Cherry Nine
      Depends on the specific parameters. Warhead 51T6, they say, is more than 1 Mt (possibly up to 3) 53T6 - 10 Kt, the minimum interception height is 70 and 5 km, respectively.
      In the first case (at 1 Mt), the zone of medium damage (5psi) with a radius of 7 km, burns 3 km 14 km. 1M + dead, 3M + wounded at the epicenter in the center of Moscow.
      In the second case, the dead and injured are 50K + and 200K +, respectively.

      Damage for explosions at an altitude of 3 km and 670 m, respectively, is indicated.
      I apologize for the misinformation. At the interception height indicated in the post, local fires and minor burns are likely.
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Or do you think the Americans will launch one rocket 1 time per hour?

      No. War blocks will be suitable at intervals of seconds, and these are very difficult goals. The radius of the confident destruction of the W71 warhead of the 49MT LIM-5A anti-missile was no more than 20 km (6 km if the warhead has protection against damaging factors). The ICBM warhead in the transatmospheric section is at a speed of 7-10 km / s.
  17. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion April 8 2018 14: 28
    0
    As for the problem of intercepting the following missiles, it will not be, because missile defense missiles will fly out before the first warhead explodes. Or do you think the Americans will launch one missile once per hour?
  18. Amateur
    Amateur April 12 2018 04: 36
    0
    Especially valuable is the information about "At the same time, the relatively large length of the product necessitated the addition of the loading platform with extended elements. A wheeled semi-trailer with mounts and means for loading the TPK into the launching shaft was also developed." Without a truck radar, COMPUTERS, Communication Systems - nonsense!
  19. Chaos
    Chaos 2 May 2018 19: 28
    0
    It is not clear how our GO is organized. Where to run to hide under the threat of a missile attack? Build new residential neighborhoods and not a single shelter. Where will the recruiting stations be located? Where to get gas masks, weapons? Who is responsible for the country's civil defense? loafers. I have not seen a single memo about actions in case of a threat of nuclear weapons. Management companies oblige to hang information in every entrance of the house!
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 19: 43
      +1
      Quote: Chaos
      Where to run to hide under the threat of a missile attack?

      If it comes to this - IMHO is better nowhere.
      Quote: Chaos
      Build new residential neighborhoods and not a single shelter

      From the twenty-fifth floor you do not run all the way to the shelter request
      Quote: Chaos
      Where will the recruiting stations be located? Where to get gas masks, weapons?

      If necessary, they will be brought to you. But definitely not
      Quote: Chaos
      with the threat of a missile attack

      There will already be, as it were softer ... late metatso, in.
      Quote: Chaos
      I have not seen a single memo about actions in case of a threat of nuclear weapons

      Stand aside and do not shine. If you want spasazzo - think in advance, there will be all “periods” provided for by the case, when you can try to fade into the shadows.
      Quote: Chaos
      Management companies oblige to hang information in every entrance of the house

      It is unlikely that you will be very pleased with this information.
      1. Chaos
        Chaos 2 May 2018 21: 16
        +1
        They made fun)) ATP))
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 2 May 2018 21: 21
          +2
          Quote: Chaos
          Made fun of

          You have a good and healthy sense of humor, and that’s good.
          The same that I wrote to you is today's reality.
          Yes, even under the Union, no one guaranteed the salvation of the civilian population in the event of a nuclear war. I know what I'm saying, because I found those times and knew well where in my town there are real bomb shelters.
          In which case only employees of the organization in whose territory these objects were located would have got there. Nobody really wanted to save us, all the others. Although not far from the town was a part of Moscow’s air defense, and it would certainly have flown there.
          That's something like request
  20. Bobxnumx
    Bobxnumx 13 May 2018 15: 49
    0
    Return Rogozin to remove Mutko!