US media praised the design of the new Russian ship

48
The new Russian Corvette project 22160 has a “fairly innovative” design, which provides great combat power with a small size of the ship, writes The Drive.

Patrol ship "Vasily Bykov" project 22160.



The publication emphasizes that the ship was created on the principle of modularity - “its armament and equipment may vary depending on the task, whether it is the fight against piracy or the support of major shock operations”.

“On the ship, in addition to the standard artillery installation caliber 57 millimeters, machine guns and anti-sabotage grenade launcher complex DP-65, there is an empty space under the helipad. It can be used to house two Caliber missile systems (Club-K), ”the article quotes. RIA News.

According to the author, this will allow small ships "to strike eight missiles at sea and land targets at a great distance."



The autonomy of the ships sailing this project is two months: "during this time the corvette can go up to six thousand nautical miles," the article notes.

This concept is innovative enough to be studied in Western naval forces. It can serve as an inspiration for their multifunctional combat ships,
the author writes.

The corvettes of the modular type of the distant sea zone of the 22160 project are being built at the Zelenodolsk Shipyard. Their main task is the protection of territorial waters, the fight against piracy, as well as the support of their larger ships in battle.

Earlier it was reported that the Black Sea Fleet plans to receive four 2020 ships by 22160.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 4 2018 11: 12
    The Sea of ​​Azov is waiting for "Vasily Bykov", the local dill pirates just need to show it Yes .
    1. +7
      April 4 2018 11: 18
      To drive the Sumerians, simple watchdogs are enough.
      1. +3
        April 4 2018 11: 22
        And what is your opinion?
        Quote: Ankypelgygyrgyn
        To drive the Sumerians, simple watchdogs are enough.
        1. +9
          April 4 2018 11: 48
          Quote: 210ox
          And what is your opinion?
          Quote: Ankypelgygyrgyn
          To drive the Sumerians, simple watchdogs are enough.

          A - “THIS” - Innovative design !!! Well it's written right there laughing laughing Yes
      2. +1
        April 4 2018 11: 38
        chase the Sumerians

        about the Sumerians - it's five! laughing laughing
        1. +8
          April 4 2018 11: 48
          I don’t know how, but real Sumerians turn upside down ... Offend the ancient nation ... And these .. Well, what are they "Sumerians" .. Lice ..
          Quote: Gorjelin
          chase the Sumerians

          about the Sumerians - it's five! laughing laughing
          1. +1
            April 4 2018 14: 39
            Sumerians cannot be offended, but can lice be?
    2. +6
      April 4 2018 12: 26
      Until we begin to REALLY hang "pirates" ukro_ pirates there will be no order am
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +5
    April 4 2018 11: 19
    As they say it’s small, but daring! Because this baby is quite formidable, with its small size.
    1. +1
      April 4 2018 16: 01
      That's interesting. Has anyone read what is written in a reprint of a bad article? Well, where does the stupid 57 mm gun come from? It has long been changed by 76 mm! hi
  4. +5
    April 4 2018 11: 21
    RIA News. This is not a ship, but a ship ..
  5. +12
    April 4 2018 11: 22
    It makes no sense if our sailors are calmly abducted in the black sea in broad daylight. To use forceful methods, political will is needed, but for now our citizens can be held hostage in banana republics (remember the situation with our pilots in Africa) and pray only for a miracle, and we as always, express * discontent *
    1. +6
      April 4 2018 11: 28
      Sense from him ...
      Strange position. And he, that at that time was standing nearby and could not do anything? And the fleet does not need ships?
      1. +7
        April 4 2018 11: 45
        Well, do we have ships in the Black Sea Fleet? and I think they were not very far away, if there was an order there wouldn’t be such a situation ..... but there is no order?
        A ship may be good, but it’s a tool ... it just takes evil from our political impotence. There are a lot of words, but as always there is no business.
        1. +3
          April 4 2018 12: 00
          Quote: Xroft
          Well, do we have ships in the Black Sea Fleet?

          for the protection of ships in the Sea of ​​Azov, it is not the Black Sea Fleet that is needed, but the maritime troops of the border troops that used to be in Azov
        2. +5
          April 4 2018 13: 14
          Quote: Xroft
          it just takes evil from our political impotence. A lot of words, but as always there is no business.

          You think politically. This is not "political impotence," but the political line of "Cat Leopold." It seems that here and there, aggressive tricks are taken by surprise. And after each such trick, our political leadership needs some time to restore its balance. It is surprising that little is thought out in advance. Really it was impossible to assume that such a gangster provocation could happen in the Sea of ​​Azov at any moment?
          1. +7
            April 4 2018 13: 23
            Quote: x.andvlad
            Really it was impossible to assume that such a gangster provocation could happen in the Sea of ​​Azov at any moment?

            Have you personally - thought a lot about the fact that it "could happen"?
            And what else, in your opinion, "can happen" in the near future?
            Work a little Wang ... and after six months or a year, we'll see which of you Wang wink
            1. +2
              April 4 2018 13: 40
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Have you personally - thought a lot about the fact that it "could happen"?

              There is probably a difference between what I think and those topics that the special services should work on?
              And here is Vanga, respected organizer?
              Special services should work!
              And to prevent such incidents, it would be sufficient to periodically patrol this "common" water area both by water and from the air by helicopters (as is done, for example, in Abkhazia)
              1. +6
                April 4 2018 13: 53
                Quote: x.andvlad
                Special services should work!

                They talked and wrote a hundred times - it’s impossible to organize supervision over every trough.
                Quote: x.andvlad
                periodic patrolling of this "common" water area both by water and from air by helicopters

                Will you personally pay for it?
                Quote: x.andvlad
                And here is Wang

                Vanga - knew ahead. You are only back, I am talking about it exactly.
                1. +4
                  April 4 2018 14: 03
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  Will you personally pay for it?

                  Not only me, but also you, apparently. Everything needs to be paid. Is this news for you?
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  They talked and wrote a hundred times - it’s impossible to organize supervision over every trough

                  Do not play the fool, dear. What is needed is not supervision of each "trough", as you say, but periodic patrolling, which will be done as a result. Only do this on time.
                  On these troughs are people, citizens, for whose safety you yourself understand who should be responsible.
                  1. +5
                    April 4 2018 14: 35
                    Quote: x.andvlad
                    What is needed is not supervision of each "trough", as you say, but periodic patrolling, which will be done as a result

                    Perhaps this will be done. And perhaps - they will limit themselves to the instruction "troughs" where they can, and where not, climb them.
                    That, from our point of view, our waters, from the opposite, is not ours at all. And the position of Ukraine in this matter, unfortunately, finds (and will continue to find) support.
                    Quote: x.andvlad
                    Only do it on time

                    If I knew where to fall, I would lay straws, you know?
                    That is why, by the way, Wang was mentioned Yes
                    1. +2
                      April 4 2018 14: 43
                      And yet, knowing that Ukraine is extremely hostile towards Russia and taking into account the constant provocations on its part, it is not very difficult to predict that there may be provocations at sea with Russian ships.
                      Rather, they just slammed again and hoped for a chance.
                      I would not be surprised if the Crimean bridge is not guarded. Hope I'm wrong.
                      1. +4
                        April 4 2018 14: 53
                        Quote: Tula gingerbread
                        Hope I'm wrong

                        Wrong.
          2. +4
            April 4 2018 14: 11
            The funny thing is that the Black Sea Fleet ships are constantly on duty at the bridge ..... but then the bridge, or ordinary people. I’m wondering if the Ukrainians or the Baltic states will go further? bring down for example our plane? or a minesweeper by storm? So we will whine in the Foreign Ministry what are all bad?
    2. +1
      April 5 2018 00: 15
      Quote: Xroft
      It is useless if our sailors are quietly abducted in the black sea in broad daylight

      It's just that there was no such arrogance on the part of Ukraine before. But now there is already a precedent, and I think that whoever needs it has already made conclusions. And as for political will, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs now needs it in order to rescue men from captivity.
  6. +3
    April 4 2018 11: 28
    innovative? possibly. for the beginning of the 70s, when the P-15 began to be put on the "mosquito fleet"
    1. +4
      April 4 2018 11: 35
      Quote: Rossia
      innovative? possibly. for the beginning of the 70s, when the P-15 began to be put on the "mosquito fleet"

      And what exactly do you see as its discrepancy with the name - “modern” and “innovative”? The ship is quite at the level to solve tasks for its intended purpose. The principle of modularity is more than modern. Opportunities for modernization during the service are present. So what is your discrepancy in your opinion?
      1. +2
        April 4 2018 12: 07
        Innovative - something new, not yet used. That failed railgun would be, in my understanding, an innovation. Everything that was installed on the project 22160 corvette was already in one form or another. I didn’t say a word about “modern” - the ship is quite modern
        1. +1
          April 4 2018 12: 14
          Quote: Rossia
          Innovative - something new, not yet used. That failed railgun would be, in my understanding, an innovation. Everything that was installed on the project 22160 corvette was already in one form or another. I didn’t say a word about “modern” - the ship is quite modern

          Well, it means our differences only in understanding the meaning of certain words. For me, modern and innovative are almost synonyms. I take off the question smile . Well, when they’ll cram under the flight deck
          something new, not yet used.
          instead of Caliber, I hope the questions disappear and you have ..: winked hi
          1. +3
            April 4 2018 12: 20
            when this crumb, to the general horror of the "partners", begins to burn the enemy with hypersonic Zircons from under the deck, then they will disappear hi winked
            1. +2
              April 4 2018 12: 21
              Quote: Rossia
              when this crumb, to the general horror of the "partners", begins to burn the enemy with hypersonic Zircons from under the deck, then they will disappear hi winked

              Then everyone will have no time for questions with answers .. laughing
      2. 0
        April 4 2018 12: 17
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        So what is your discrepancy in your opinion?

        IT is made in Russia ..
      3. 0
        April 4 2018 14: 20
        Very similar to the border guard 22100 "Ocean". Or not?
    2. +1
      April 4 2018 11: 42
      Quote: Rossia
      innovative? possibly. for the beginning of the 70s, when the P-15 began to be put on the "mosquito fleet"

      I will join KVU-NSVD: what do you think is “wrong” in it? dimensions or what? so for his tasks are big and not needed. it’s not very convenient and practical to drive pirate missile cruisers. and technologically it corresponds to the epithets “modern” and “innovative”.
    3. +4
      April 4 2018 11: 57
      I do not agree with you .. the term "mosquito fleet" in relation to project 22160 is not too appropriate, as it is positioned as a "corvette of the far sea zone" ... and the hand of this "mosquito" is long, for 2 thousand. Km
      1. +1
        April 4 2018 22: 13
        hi...Hi Andrew.
        Quote: assa67
        ... the term "mosquito fleet" in relation to project 22160 is not too appropriate.

        ... That's for sure ... Despite the dimensions (bigger), in comparison with the armament, this “overseas” can be attributed to the “mosquito”:
        USS Milwaukee Coastal Ship (LCS 5)
        Key Features: Full displacement of 3500 tons. Length 115,3 meters, width 17,5 meters, draft 3,7 meters. Speed ​​45 knots.
        Engines: 2 Rolls-Royce MT30 36 MW gas turbine engines; 2 Colt-Pielstick diesel engines; 4 Rolls-Royce water cannons. The total capacity of 36 MW.
        Cruising range 3500 miles at 18 knots. The autonomy of swimming is 21 days.
        Crew: 50 people of the main crew, during the deployment of the crew of 75 people (the crew will change).
        Armament: 1 × 1 57-mm universal naval artillery mount BAE Systems Mk 110; 1 × 21 shipborne anti-aircraft missile system RIM-116; four guns of caliber 50 mm; Mission Modules.
        Aviation group: 2 helicopters MH-60R / S Seahawks and one UAV MQ-8 Fire Scout.

        TTX of project 22160 here:
        http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-789.html
        1. +3
          April 4 2018 22: 55
          Sanya, Respect good as always, in the hole, let the "mourners" - "little mosquitoes", "fishing crap" .....
  7. +1
    April 4 2018 11: 32
    Cheap, good and cheerful. The Star has already begun to scum from the east and crap on amers
  8. 0
    April 4 2018 11: 34
    All this is good and wonderful, but ships of greater displacement are needed.
  9. +1
    April 4 2018 11: 35
    Corvettes Corvettes ... And where are the destroyers? Still, the Americans would not have praised ... They would have built a cruiser instead of him, then they would have painted what a dead-end development option, and then of course they would praise
    1. +2
      April 4 2018 12: 03
      Quote: Vol4ara
      Still Americans would not praise

      Yeah, I was visited by the same thought: if they praise me, it means crap.
  10. +2
    April 4 2018 12: 04
    Well guys 4 ships until 2020 this maloot
  11. +2
    April 4 2018 12: 22
    "On board, besides ..."
    A vessel can be a civilian, and one that is visited in a hospital, and a ship is always only a battle ...
    And the design and functionality are excellent, I hope they will do enough to protect our borders.
    1. +2
      April 4 2018 12: 37
      Quote: gukoyan
      A vessel can be a civilian, and one that is visited in a hospital, and a ship is always only a battle ...

      I love such gurus who do not know a damn thing, but they teach everyone. The main pathos for ten. A ship is a special case of a ship. So, dear, the ship can be military. Ozhegov's dictionary to help ...
  12. +2
    April 4 2018 12: 23
    has a "fairly innovative" design that provides tremendous combat power

    Design is power, it is power, it is our main secret weapon!
  13. +2
    April 4 2018 12: 23
    Good day to all.
    But I don’t like it when the Yankees praise us, it’s always alarming. When scolded and blamed, then the soul is calm, then we are on the right path))).
    On the ship: yes — it’s expensive, yes — the armament is weak, yes — the modularity is not tested by tests, yes — there is no air defense, but my opinion is that any project is important and necessary for us now, especially since it can free us from minor tasks like patrolling and demonstrating Flag more powerful units. Plus, this is the accumulation of experience in design and production, the preservation of working hands and their advanced training.

    By the way, I’m all wondering what he has placed for the nose art installation? Who will tell? It doesn’t seem like a set of "Bending" ..
  14. +1
    April 4 2018 17: 16
    Yes, new ships. The fleet really needs it. Especially for the fight against diggers of the Black Sea. Now it’s just parasitic. Individuals of ancient diggers of the sea (pirates)
  15. +1
    April 5 2018 00: 20
    has a "fairly innovative" design that provides tremendous combat power with a small ship size, writes The Drive.
    I did not think that design could affect combat power. I have always believed that the combat capability of a ship is influenced by the design features and weapons incorporated in the design. And design is the lot of artists and decorators, not designers. But still nice when the weapon looks beautiful.