Operation "Antidote". Organizers and performers of the provocation in Salisbury
The British laboratory in Porton Down could not identify the country of origin of the substance that was used in Salisbury. Why?
The editor of the American magazine "Culture Wars" E. Michael Jones concluded that the poisoning of a former GRU agent who had spied for Britain, Sergey Skripal and his daughter, was carried out under the "fake flag" by the British special service MI-5 . He outlined his thoughts on April 2 in an interview with the Iranian English-language television channel Press TV. He stressed that "Britain is only following the elite of the United States in this matter and demonizing Russia, and the countries of the European Union are only following the example of Britain in this matter." But if so, then MI-5 could only be the perpetrator of this crime, and the customers are on the other side of the ocean.
In the British presentation, designed for the mental level of losers from elementary school and the leadership of Western countries, it was said as “proof” of Russia's guilt in poisoning: “No other country, except Russia, has the necessary capabilities and motives. There is no other plausible explanation ". But is it really?
On the last page of their presentation, the authors of this masterpiece themselves did not notice how they highlighted the customers of this provocation. They listed the previous "crimes" of Russia. Any person who follows political events in the world knows that there is not a single proof of Russia for any of these acts, and for a number of events, for example, about the war in South Ossetia, it was officially established that the fighting began Georgian armed forces, not Russia. That is, the entire English list is a set of fakes and lies, designed to demonize Russia before the eyes of the world community. However, the British embed in one logical chain with the rest of the "criminal acts" of Russia and Slippery poisoning, and showing that all these false accusations are stages of the same program to blacken our country.
Let's see who was the most overwhelming, trying to accuse Russia of the listed acts reporting from the 2006 year, that is, from the time when Russia began to show the first signs of exit from external control. First of all, this is the leadership of the United States, which is only a screen hiding the real rulers of this country, and more than half of the world. It is no secret that almost all American presidents, starting with Woodrow Wilson, before being elected to the post, receive approval, so to speak, a label for reigning, in various globalist structures organized by the global financial backstage. Initially, it was only the Council on Foreign Relations, later the Bilderberg club and a number of other backstage organizations became such structures. In the USA, recently the name of this structure has taken root - “The Deep State”.
At the last expanded meeting of the Bilderberg Club, held in the American town of Chantilly in 2017, the National Security Advisor to the President of the United States, Herbert Raymond McMaster, was among those present. By a "strange coincidence of circumstances," Trump sent "the most brilliant and heroic general" of modern America, McMaster, at the height of the hype about the Skripl poisoning. Didn't Trump sense that having McMaster behind him could compromise him if the true organizers of the provocation in Salisbury were revealed?
At the same gathering in Chantilly, former CIA head John Brennan was present. It was after his visit to Kiev in April 2014 of the year that a decision was made to hold power actions in the Donbas. "Brennan actually authorized the use weapons and provoked the bloodshed in Ukraine, "- said the former President of Ukraine Yanukovych. In a presentation submitted by the British, the destabilization of Ukraine was attributed to Russia.
There was also the King of Holland and the Minister of Defense of this country, Jeanine Hennis-Plasshart. Probably, their presence was due to the need to consult on the further fabrication of the case against Russia regarding the Boeing over the Donbas that was shot down in the summer of 2014.
Gideon Rahman, chief foreign affairs columnist for the British newspaper The Financial Times, lit up at a gathering of the Bilderberg Club. It was this March edition of 9 that hastened to debunk the arguments of the Russian side that Russia did not need to poison some long-established spy. "The Financial Times" said that Skripal, it turns out, continued to work for the intelligence services of Great Britain and other foreign countries. That is, representatives of the "Deep State" tried to convince public opinion that Russia had a motive for the elimination of the traitor.
The intelligence services of the United States and Great Britain, as well as the main Western media outlets, are under the control of this very club of the elderly paranoid, suffering from delusions of world domination, including the CIA, MI5, MI6 and the most popular information resources, among which are especially worth highlighting such as CNN - " Cable News Network, which American patriots call the Crap News Network News"), The New York Times, called smart people, New York Crimes and the Washington Post. Many Americans call this newspaper the Washington Compost because of the utter nonsense, which is published on its pages. It is the political figures who are part of the secret world structures and the media, personifying the opinion of the world behind the scenes, who are most trying to represent Russia as a monster that has emerged from the depths of the sea.
Among the main topics discussed at the last meeting of the Bilderberg Club were: "EU development and management", "Can globalization be slowed down?", "Information wars", "Russia's role in the world order". The set of topics and the dirty information war that broke out against our country shows that special attention was paid to Russia and its growing role in the world.
Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray in an interview with the online publication "The Consortium" said that the main supervisor of Skripal in Moscow was British intelligence officer MI-6 Pablo Miller, who lived in Salisbury, not far from Skrypal's house. Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 employee in Moscow, has worked with this curator in a bundle and is still working. These people took part in the creation of a “Trump dossier” in which they tried to prove the ties between the US President and Russia. It is no secret that the very "Deep State" was opposed to Trump in the United States. That is, Steele and Miller worked in the interests of the world behind the scenes. Considering the fact that the British Prime Minister introduced the indictment "very likely" into international law, can we just as well say that it was these people who dealt with Skripale at the request of those for whom they drafted their report on Trump and Russia?
This whistle takes place at the moment when Russia is preparing to host the World Cup. The UK and several other Western countries have already called for a boycott of this event. The world behind the scenes, eager to finish off Russia, is unthinkable the idea that half a million fans from all over the world will visit our country, and they will see not Mordor with orcs and monsters from the bottom of the sea, but a beautiful country with millions of sympathetic, honest and hospitable people. And then they will tell about their positive impressions to their friends and acquaintances in their countries.
The British leadership is unlikely to devote to the situation. Teresa May, Boris Johnson, and the British defense minister were completely hysterical, in their eyes the horror of what had happened was read. After the hype raised by the British, an anecdote was born: "Lavrov comes to Putin and says that Teresa May was raped last night in Salisbury. Putin sighed and asked:" Are they all accusing Russia or just me? "
The British Prime Minister and the rest of the actors in this ominous performance more than enough used the situation to hide their own flaws, and perhaps even shameful crimes. First, they needed to divert from the people the failures with Brexit, because, as it turned out, the entrance to the EU was worth a pound, and the output was two, just like in criminal gangs. The exit from the EU threatens the British with losses in the amount of 30 billion euros in the near future.
Secondly, Foggy Albion has been shaken by pedophile scandals involving top officials of this state for several years. First, in 2014, a case of the rape of almost one and a half thousand minor children between the ages of 11 and 15 in the English town of Rotherham surfaced. When the police tried to punish the guilty, the case was quickly lowered and the guilty were announced, basically, only those who had already died or reached the stage of senile marasmus. It should be noted that at that moment Teresa May was the Minister of the Interior of the country.
And just before the poisoning of Skrypal and his daughter, a new pedophile scandal had matured. This time it turned out that with the full connivance of the authorities in the town of Telford, about a thousand young girls were raped, many of whom were killed. About this dirty stories The Mirror newspaper reported, but it all quickly sank in a powerful stream of lies about the poisoning of Skripal and his daughter.
It is clear with the motives, organizers and performers of this provocation, now let's see if there were any opportunities for the "deep state" to poison Skrypal and his daughter with the gas "Novice"? Since the British prevented the death of Skrypal and his daughter, who was already recovering, the British had an antidote. But it can be obtained only with the presence of the nerve agent. That is, in Porton Down chemical laboratory located in 13 km from the House of Skrypal, there is a sample of this poisonous substance.
According to the head of the laboratory of chemical and analytical control of the Defense Center Igor Rybalchenko, a toxic substance similar to gas A-234, which the English say is called “Novice”, was found in the base of the spectral library of chemical compounds of the US National Bureau of Standards in 1998 year. That is, in the United States conducted the development of this toxic substance.
The nerve agent, called the English "Novice", was developed in the USSR by the State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology (GNIIOKHT), whose branch was located in Nukus, Uzbekistan. After the collapse of the USSR, Uzbekistan became the base for the destructive acts of "Bilderberg" by George Soros. His Foundation has become "the largest private investor in the country." Uzbekistan at that time worked in close cooperation with the United States for the disposal of objects where the very “Novice” was tested, that is, the Americans had direct access to chemical weapons of this class. World backstage had the opportunity to take possession of the Soviet samples of "Novice" in Uzbekistan.
Analyzing the entire chain of events, we can assume that the organizers of the provocation in Salisbury are the structures of the “Deep State”, which has a serious influence in all the management bodies of Western countries, and the executors were employees of Western special services.
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, was hardly mistaken when she said: "The provocation that was organized in Great Britain is supported by strong, powerful forces that are in the United States of America and in Great Britain." Notice, she did not blame the governments of these countries, which, because of their low importance in world politics, were hardly devoted to the plan of provocation in Salisbury!
The editor of the American magazine "Culture Wars" E. Michael Jones concluded that the poisoning of a former GRU agent who had spied for Britain, Sergey Skripal and his daughter, was carried out under the "fake flag" by the British special service MI-5 . He outlined his thoughts on April 2 in an interview with the Iranian English-language television channel Press TV. He stressed that "Britain is only following the elite of the United States in this matter and demonizing Russia, and the countries of the European Union are only following the example of Britain in this matter." But if so, then MI-5 could only be the perpetrator of this crime, and the customers are on the other side of the ocean.
In the British presentation, designed for the mental level of losers from elementary school and the leadership of Western countries, it was said as “proof” of Russia's guilt in poisoning: “No other country, except Russia, has the necessary capabilities and motives. There is no other plausible explanation ". But is it really?
On the last page of their presentation, the authors of this masterpiece themselves did not notice how they highlighted the customers of this provocation. They listed the previous "crimes" of Russia. Any person who follows political events in the world knows that there is not a single proof of Russia for any of these acts, and for a number of events, for example, about the war in South Ossetia, it was officially established that the fighting began Georgian armed forces, not Russia. That is, the entire English list is a set of fakes and lies, designed to demonize Russia before the eyes of the world community. However, the British embed in one logical chain with the rest of the "criminal acts" of Russia and Slippery poisoning, and showing that all these false accusations are stages of the same program to blacken our country.
Let's see who was the most overwhelming, trying to accuse Russia of the listed acts reporting from the 2006 year, that is, from the time when Russia began to show the first signs of exit from external control. First of all, this is the leadership of the United States, which is only a screen hiding the real rulers of this country, and more than half of the world. It is no secret that almost all American presidents, starting with Woodrow Wilson, before being elected to the post, receive approval, so to speak, a label for reigning, in various globalist structures organized by the global financial backstage. Initially, it was only the Council on Foreign Relations, later the Bilderberg club and a number of other backstage organizations became such structures. In the USA, recently the name of this structure has taken root - “The Deep State”.
At the last expanded meeting of the Bilderberg Club, held in the American town of Chantilly in 2017, the National Security Advisor to the President of the United States, Herbert Raymond McMaster, was among those present. By a "strange coincidence of circumstances," Trump sent "the most brilliant and heroic general" of modern America, McMaster, at the height of the hype about the Skripl poisoning. Didn't Trump sense that having McMaster behind him could compromise him if the true organizers of the provocation in Salisbury were revealed?
At the same gathering in Chantilly, former CIA head John Brennan was present. It was after his visit to Kiev in April 2014 of the year that a decision was made to hold power actions in the Donbas. "Brennan actually authorized the use weapons and provoked the bloodshed in Ukraine, "- said the former President of Ukraine Yanukovych. In a presentation submitted by the British, the destabilization of Ukraine was attributed to Russia.
There was also the King of Holland and the Minister of Defense of this country, Jeanine Hennis-Plasshart. Probably, their presence was due to the need to consult on the further fabrication of the case against Russia regarding the Boeing over the Donbas that was shot down in the summer of 2014.
Gideon Rahman, chief foreign affairs columnist for the British newspaper The Financial Times, lit up at a gathering of the Bilderberg Club. It was this March edition of 9 that hastened to debunk the arguments of the Russian side that Russia did not need to poison some long-established spy. "The Financial Times" said that Skripal, it turns out, continued to work for the intelligence services of Great Britain and other foreign countries. That is, representatives of the "Deep State" tried to convince public opinion that Russia had a motive for the elimination of the traitor.
The intelligence services of the United States and Great Britain, as well as the main Western media outlets, are under the control of this very club of the elderly paranoid, suffering from delusions of world domination, including the CIA, MI5, MI6 and the most popular information resources, among which are especially worth highlighting such as CNN - " Cable News Network, which American patriots call the Crap News Network News"), The New York Times, called smart people, New York Crimes and the Washington Post. Many Americans call this newspaper the Washington Compost because of the utter nonsense, which is published on its pages. It is the political figures who are part of the secret world structures and the media, personifying the opinion of the world behind the scenes, who are most trying to represent Russia as a monster that has emerged from the depths of the sea.
Among the main topics discussed at the last meeting of the Bilderberg Club were: "EU development and management", "Can globalization be slowed down?", "Information wars", "Russia's role in the world order". The set of topics and the dirty information war that broke out against our country shows that special attention was paid to Russia and its growing role in the world.
Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray in an interview with the online publication "The Consortium" said that the main supervisor of Skripal in Moscow was British intelligence officer MI-6 Pablo Miller, who lived in Salisbury, not far from Skrypal's house. Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 employee in Moscow, has worked with this curator in a bundle and is still working. These people took part in the creation of a “Trump dossier” in which they tried to prove the ties between the US President and Russia. It is no secret that the very "Deep State" was opposed to Trump in the United States. That is, Steele and Miller worked in the interests of the world behind the scenes. Considering the fact that the British Prime Minister introduced the indictment "very likely" into international law, can we just as well say that it was these people who dealt with Skripale at the request of those for whom they drafted their report on Trump and Russia?
This whistle takes place at the moment when Russia is preparing to host the World Cup. The UK and several other Western countries have already called for a boycott of this event. The world behind the scenes, eager to finish off Russia, is unthinkable the idea that half a million fans from all over the world will visit our country, and they will see not Mordor with orcs and monsters from the bottom of the sea, but a beautiful country with millions of sympathetic, honest and hospitable people. And then they will tell about their positive impressions to their friends and acquaintances in their countries.
The British leadership is unlikely to devote to the situation. Teresa May, Boris Johnson, and the British defense minister were completely hysterical, in their eyes the horror of what had happened was read. After the hype raised by the British, an anecdote was born: "Lavrov comes to Putin and says that Teresa May was raped last night in Salisbury. Putin sighed and asked:" Are they all accusing Russia or just me? "
The British Prime Minister and the rest of the actors in this ominous performance more than enough used the situation to hide their own flaws, and perhaps even shameful crimes. First, they needed to divert from the people the failures with Brexit, because, as it turned out, the entrance to the EU was worth a pound, and the output was two, just like in criminal gangs. The exit from the EU threatens the British with losses in the amount of 30 billion euros in the near future.
Secondly, Foggy Albion has been shaken by pedophile scandals involving top officials of this state for several years. First, in 2014, a case of the rape of almost one and a half thousand minor children between the ages of 11 and 15 in the English town of Rotherham surfaced. When the police tried to punish the guilty, the case was quickly lowered and the guilty were announced, basically, only those who had already died or reached the stage of senile marasmus. It should be noted that at that moment Teresa May was the Minister of the Interior of the country.
And just before the poisoning of Skrypal and his daughter, a new pedophile scandal had matured. This time it turned out that with the full connivance of the authorities in the town of Telford, about a thousand young girls were raped, many of whom were killed. About this dirty stories The Mirror newspaper reported, but it all quickly sank in a powerful stream of lies about the poisoning of Skripal and his daughter.
It is clear with the motives, organizers and performers of this provocation, now let's see if there were any opportunities for the "deep state" to poison Skrypal and his daughter with the gas "Novice"? Since the British prevented the death of Skrypal and his daughter, who was already recovering, the British had an antidote. But it can be obtained only with the presence of the nerve agent. That is, in Porton Down chemical laboratory located in 13 km from the House of Skrypal, there is a sample of this poisonous substance.
According to the head of the laboratory of chemical and analytical control of the Defense Center Igor Rybalchenko, a toxic substance similar to gas A-234, which the English say is called “Novice”, was found in the base of the spectral library of chemical compounds of the US National Bureau of Standards in 1998 year. That is, in the United States conducted the development of this toxic substance.
The nerve agent, called the English "Novice", was developed in the USSR by the State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology (GNIIOKHT), whose branch was located in Nukus, Uzbekistan. After the collapse of the USSR, Uzbekistan became the base for the destructive acts of "Bilderberg" by George Soros. His Foundation has become "the largest private investor in the country." Uzbekistan at that time worked in close cooperation with the United States for the disposal of objects where the very “Novice” was tested, that is, the Americans had direct access to chemical weapons of this class. World backstage had the opportunity to take possession of the Soviet samples of "Novice" in Uzbekistan.
Analyzing the entire chain of events, we can assume that the organizers of the provocation in Salisbury are the structures of the “Deep State”, which has a serious influence in all the management bodies of Western countries, and the executors were employees of Western special services.
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, was hardly mistaken when she said: "The provocation that was organized in Great Britain is supported by strong, powerful forces that are in the United States of America and in Great Britain." Notice, she did not blame the governments of these countries, which, because of their low importance in world politics, were hardly devoted to the plan of provocation in Salisbury!
Information