The secret weapon of the 2 Cold War

26
Edition The avion newspaper publishes a material called "The Secret weapon 2 of the Cold War. The material is devoted to modern military-technical developments of four states of the world: Russia, the USA, China and India.

The secret weapon of the 2 Cold War




In this case, it is mainly about Russia.

The author of the material tells his readers about the unique modern weapons presented by the Russian president, including hypersonic weapons.

From the material:
Russia said it has fully developed a system that will be deployed in 2019 year. This system is called Avangard, and it will launch SS-19 reusable accelerators on board. Russia also stated that these weapons were successfully tested in preparation for mass production. Although the exact details and technical characteristics of the Avangard system are scarce, and one can always be skeptical of Russian statements, personnel from another rocket system have appeared. In mid-March, a high-tech KH-72M “Dagger” high-tech hypersonic rocket system was launched from a modernized high-altitude interceptor MiG-31. Russia again declares its new rocket, but in the video it simply turns into a modified Iskander ballistic missile that already existed in the Russian arsenal. Russia also claimed that in 2017, they had tested a hypersonic missile at sea, but these claims are also questionable.


Further, the author continues to rush between the definitions of Russian weapons. On the one hand, he writes about the threat, on the other hand he constantly mentions the term “doubtful”.

From the article:
The missile system, which Russian President Putin showed on the screen during his annual message, is a cruise missile with a nuclear power plant and with an almost unlimited range, called the "Petrel". This would be a completely new strategic strike weapon compared with a conventional ballistic missile or even with hypersonic weapon systems. With almost 20 000 km range, this rocket could hit any targets in the combat zone. This rocket is specifically designed as a missile defense suppression weapon. All the nuances about this weapon are published in the Russian media, but the reality of these weapons, which actually exist in usable condition, remains uncertain.


In the same article, the author talks about the development of the latest (including hypersonic) weapons in the United States, China and India. In particular, it speaks of the BrahMos missiles, the Chinese DF-21 and the American hypersonic armament for the F-35.

As a result, the author summarizes that modern weapons put the world on the brink of a big war, in which every mistake or provocation can cost too much. According to him, the means of delivery of nuclear warheads are being improved, and hence the time of approach decreases.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    April 4 2018 07: 51
    These "experts" breed in batches and do not write unless on the toilet.
    1. +1
      April 4 2018 07: 55
      but the reality of this weapon, which actually exists in a usable condition, remains dubious.

      the competence of this EChspert remains doubtful
      1. +1
        April 4 2018 08: 35
        Quote: Hammerlock
        but the reality of this weapon, which actually exists in a usable condition, remains dubious.

        the competence of this EChspert remains doubtful

        While no one has ever seen all of the above weapons, the word "doubtful" is quite appropriate.
      2. +1
        April 4 2018 11: 54
        As long as these products are not used at least in training, he has every reason for doubt. I do not understand your indignation.
      3. -1
        April 5 2018 22: 47
        You need to understand the reason and purpose, which was the statement made by the president about the latest weapons on March 1. The situation was aggravated by the use of the United States and the police of the mass strike of the Kyrgyz Republic and aviation against the Syrian troops to turn the tide in Syria. Then the president made it clear that the answer would be complete and unlimited, up to the use of nuclear weapons and the latest tools. For some, the demonstration of pictures, of course, was more a demonstration of opportunities than existing mass realities ... But the goal was to discourage the idea of ​​a mass strike in Syria, because the test was already with 59 Tomahawks ...
    2. 0
      April 4 2018 07: 57
      Let them doubt who does not give them, everyone is trying to convince themselves and others that the new Russian weapon is a bluff.
    3. +6
      April 4 2018 07: 58
      Quote: 210ox
      and do not write unless on the toilet.
      which is doubtful, most likely they write)
    4. 0
      April 4 2018 09: 28
      At almost 20 km range, this missile could hit any targets in the combat zone

      How did you learn shaitan ?? Even we don’t say a figure, they say it unlimitedly, like it can fly as much as you want over the territory and strike at the right time, but these have already been calculated ...
    5. 0
      April 14 2018 13: 47
      Quote: 210ox
      These "experts" breed in batches and do not write unless on the toilet.

      That's what they write on the toilet.
    6. 0
      April 28 2018 04: 23
      and do not write unless on the toilet
      I wouldn’t promise it.
  2. +2
    April 4 2018 07: 52
    While everyone is constrained by complete total annihilation, fear and minimal remnants of humanity! And here are two options, we cross the line and then the end, or humanity will take a step forward to peace, against politics!
    1. +4
      April 4 2018 08: 12
      Quote: bazzbazz
      While everyone is constrained by complete total annihilation, fear and minimal remnants of humanity! And here are two options, we cross the line and then the end, or humanity will take a step forward to peace, against politics!

      So then it is, everything is correct, everything is correct, yes. It is said beautifully. Only two questions arise, who are "we" and "humanity" is who?
      I would rephrase and say that WE are not against the world. But is it correct to call MANKIND a separate hegemon, hehe? I think no. laughing
      1. +3
        April 4 2018 08: 59
        We do not need war, we need peace and preferably all laughing , banter of course laughing
    2. 0
      April 11 2018 10: 27
      It is unlikely that "private capital" in its militarization himself stop before such a value as "peace between the strongest powers." Armaments, conflicts and lobbying for private cross-border campaigns are an instrument for promoting one’s interests, a way to increase sales, and simply a criterion for the survival of capital. How can this be willfully refuse? No way, I think.
  3. +3
    April 4 2018 07: 55
    Well, if all of Russia's new weapons are “dubious," don't worry so much. Relax gentlemen experts ...
    1. 0
      April 4 2018 07: 56
      Relax gentlemen experts ...

      let the rolls relax lol
    2. 0
      April 4 2018 14: 34
      Quote: Jovanni
      if all of Russia's new weapons are “doubtful,” don't worry so much

      So all these phrases about doubtfulness are intended to calm the "western" inhabitants. Otherwise, for example, office clerks will categorically demand the inclusion of a clause on the free daily issue of diapers in the trade union agreement. (But how could it be otherwise? Some kind of bogeyman "flask" will be thrown into the trash can, you will immediately need diapers! After all, it will be after terrible stories about terrible Russian weapons !!!)
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +2
    April 4 2018 08: 09
    This system is called the Vanguard, and it will launch the SS-19 reusable accelerators on board. R
    Journalists! Well, turn your head on when translating ....
    All the nuances about these weapons are published in the Russian media, but
    If what our media publish about Petrel, for the author
    The Avion Newspaper Edition
    is "all the nuances", then as they say, call .. request
  6. +1
    April 4 2018 08: 11
    In particular, it refers to BrahMos rockets

    But nothing that BrahMos is the renamed Yakhont?
    Again, a Russian rocket. Yes laughing
  7. +1
    April 4 2018 08: 12
    Yeah .. SHCHAZZ ... I will tell EVERYTHING !! Naive aki nursery school. Real experts will not say such a thing, and will not show videos where at least a drop of truth will be ... or will not be. Only a warning leak for hawks (true cockfishes), but they are proudly called.
  8. +1
    April 4 2018 09: 53
    Yeah!! The chief editor of "Aviation Newspaper" Henry Neiberlien in his "opus" "Secret Weapons of Cold War 2.0" really reminds an unlucky gynecologist tormented by thoughts: "the patient is pregnant in generalpregnant halfor not pregnant does?? "
    The only really clever idea is only at the end:
    "This means that by the early 2020s the Earth's four of the Earth's most powerful nations will be armed with nuclear weapons that can be delivered faster than ever through even the most robust defenses. In the coming years mutually assured destruction will take on a whole new meaning, tensions continue to rise, provocations and slander continue to be thrown, in the late Cold War of the 21st century. "
    ((By the beginning of the 20s, the 21st century, the four most powerful states on the planet will have nuclear weapons capable of breaking through the strongest defense. In the coming years, the ability to “mutually assure destruction” will reach a new level, in the period of exacerbation of tension (in international relations) provocations and slander (which takes place) in the newest cold war of the 21st century.)
  9. +2
    April 4 2018 10: 06
    In all versions of the new weapons, technologies are used that cannot be skipped by simple desires. Therefore, the average person will talk a lot, and scientists will suffer and think how to move into a new era of development.
  10. +2
    April 4 2018 11: 46
    It is only natural that the brain brought up on unconditional Western military superiority refuses to believe that Russia has already created this weapon, which is unattainable for the West.
  11. +1
    April 4 2018 11: 56
    And fig it to print? blah blah not even disguised
  12. 0
    April 4 2018 14: 17
    I think that Putin did not have the task of proving that we have something unexpected. It is enough to sow doubt. The fear of expectation is always stronger than the fear of understanding.
  13. +1
    6 May 2018 00: 19
    We have SUCH devices!
    But we won’t tell you about them. wassat

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"