Military Review

An American expert told why cooperation between Russia, China and the USA is needed.

23
Despite the fact that Russia and China are named in the American strategy as the main rivals of the United States, cooperation between these three states is very important for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. weaponsleads RIA News opinion of the director of the Center for Military-Political Analysis of the Hudson Institute (USA) Richard Weitz.


An American expert told why cooperation between Russia, China and the USA is needed.


Recall that in December, the Pentagon published a new strategy on national security, the main focus of which, as before, was on Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and the Middle East. Earlier, Donald Trump said that Moscow and Beijing “are trying to challenge American influence, values ​​and wealth,” but the United States “will try to build a great partnership” with these countries.

I think that relations between China, Russia and the United States are really important (for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons). Now in the US national security strategy, Russia and China are named as the main rivals. But we have to cooperate in areas where we can do this, one of these areas is non-proliferation of nuclear weapons,
Weitz said at a lecture at MGIMO.

In addition, he said, it is necessary to introduce control over the proliferation of conventional weapons.

The expert also believes that if we can resolve the issue of developing nuclear weapons in the DPRK, many other countries will also be able to resolve it.

The more nuclear powers there can be in the world, the more dangerous we are,
added Weiz.
Photos used:
http://army-news.ru
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Kars
    Kars April 3 2018 14: 45
    +12
    Well, let them take away nuclear weapons from Israel)
    1. Sergey39
      Sergey39 April 3 2018 14: 47
      +5
      Also from Europe
    2. Sergey39
      Sergey39 April 3 2018 14: 48
      0
      Also from Europe
    3. Proxima
      Proxima April 3 2018 15: 09
      0
      Quote: Kars
      Well, let them take away nuclear weapons from Israel)

      That something pick up - you need it "something" give at the beginning. And so, all nuclear weapons in Israel "local spill", including carriers ("Jericho). Moreover, hypothetically imagine that the United States by force will take away from Israel their nuclear weapons, but for this, Israel must recognize that they have IT, so Israel does not sign an agreement on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. (why sign contract for what you do not have request ) The Americans will not scour the Israeli bases and facilities, after all, a sovereign state. recourse
      In a word, oh and the cunning of these children of Zion. lol
      1. Kerensky
        Kerensky April 3 2018 15: 20
        0
        The Americans will not scour the Israeli bases and facilities, after all, a sovereign state.

        And what is Aunt May in London? One call and in an hour Israel will have nuclear weapons. And Boris will confirm!
        1. Proxima
          Proxima April 3 2018 15: 40
          +1
          Quote: Kerensky
          The Americans will not scour the Israeli bases and facilities, after all, a sovereign state.

          And what is Aunt May in London? One call and in an hour Israel will have nuclear weapons. And Boris will confirm!

          What for? request Israel has a pretty decent nuclear arsenal to fight off its Arab "friends", and it doesn’t need more. Israel is definitely not going to fight with Russia, the USA and China. According to estimates by experts from the US RUMO, Israel has at its disposal about 80 nuclear warheads, while having fissile materials needed to produce from 115 to 190 warheads. Moreover, according to the same experts, Israel is one of the countries with full-fledged strategic nuclear triad (along with the United States, Russia and China), that is, it has weapons for delivering nuclear weapons in all three natural environments. belay
          As Aunt Sofa from Odessa said, it’s better to always have your own than to ask someone so that there is no response demand. winked
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh April 3 2018 20: 11
            0
            Israeli nuclear weapons are not deployed on carriers. He is not on combat duty.
            It is stored unassembled and cannot be applied all at once.
            Like Japan, by the way.
            Russia, the United States and China have nuclear missiles on duty. Therefore there is a serious danger
            sudden nuclear war. Due to technical malfunctions, for example.
            Of course, we need a trilateral agreement on the control and reduction of strategic nuclear weapons.
            Like that observed between Russia and America, but with the inclusion of China.
            1. Fayter2017
              Fayter2017 April 4 2018 01: 37
              +1
              As you can say, why don't you know? Or in Israeli warehouses with nuclear weapons there were inspections from international organizations that would confirm your speculation that your nuclear weapons allegedly lay apart or the Jews are such a gullible people?
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh April 4 2018 12: 19
                0
                On all the tables about nuclear weapons, about Israel it is written "in reserve."
                To make it easier for you to understand, tactical nuclear weapons are "perishable." Maintaining it in a combat-ready state is also a mess. Now sort it out, then collect it. Therefore, those countries that do not need to deliver a surprise or be prepared to respond to a sudden strike,
                keep warhead disassembled. Cheaper and more reliable.
      2. faridg7
        faridg7 April 3 2018 15: 41
        +2
        Come on, Americans ,? take away nuclear weapons by force ,? Jews? Yes, never. Now, if it were Arabs or Turks, then the Americans would not even need confirmation that it really is. It would be like in Iraq, would have waved a dosimeter at the UNe and flooded.
      3. Dam
        Dam April 4 2018 01: 23
        0
        As you know: for every cunning opu there is a bolt with a left-hand thread. No matter how they outwit themselves.
    4. APASUS
      APASUS April 3 2018 19: 23
      0
      Quote: Kars
      Well, let them take away nuclear weapons from Israel)

      What are you, what weapons to take from Israel?
      They openly sell solid propellant ballistic missiles and are not shy, it’s constantly scaring us, but they can:
      As the British newspaper The Sunday Times recently reported, the British Ministry of Defense was trying to hide the "fact of the unsuccessful launch of the Trident solid-fuel ballistic missile" in June last year.

      What would happen if our missiles of this type were transferred to Korea, for example, I think the scandal was not enough, but here nothing, all the way through!
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 3 2018 14: 48
    0
    cooperation between these three states is very important for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons
    Logically. Although this blizzard has already passed. bully
    The more nuclear powers there can be in the world, the more dangerous we are,
    added Weiz.
    We need a common distracting enemy. Logically. But we no longer believe them. am
    What will happen if our normal. Filmed by professionals cartoon about a group blow along the coast of Poseidon will be removed bully repeat
  3. Russia
    Russia April 3 2018 14: 49
    +4
    The teeth want to talk to us, but to arm themselves.
  4. Altona
    Altona April 3 2018 14: 49
    0
    Minke let it slip. If Russia and China withdraw from the Treaties on the Control and Proliferation of Nuclear and Other Weapons, the United States will face enormous problems if they insist on their role as the only world hegemon.
  5. Aaleks1974
    Aaleks1974 April 3 2018 14: 50
    +1
    The most dangerous thing for any country begins at the moment when the United States announces friendship and cooperation with it - no enemies are needed with such “friends”.
  6. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD April 3 2018 14: 55
    +2
    The whale whisks softly .. I hope that after this lecture a lesson with “exposing tricks” was held with the students ..
  7. Slovak
    Slovak April 3 2018 14: 59
    0
    Though ... in the eyes, they will say "God's dew." The United States places its nuclear weapons in NATO countries, but this is not considered proliferation?
  8. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova April 3 2018 15: 39
    +1
    And what power will these signed papers now have if the Americans, the British, etc. can easily ignore any agreements, if it is beneficial for them?
  9. Weyland
    Weyland April 3 2018 16: 03
    0
    Now in the US national security strategy, Russia and China are named as main rivals. But we must cooperate in areas where we can do this.

    Are they keeping us suckers? Willingly, I believe that we have enough of those in the government - but certainly it will not work with the Chinese!
  10. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz April 3 2018 18: 34
    0
    I think that relations between China, Russia and the United States are actually important (for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons).
    And what then is the United States doing, teaching the "NATO allies" on the use of nuclear weapons - B61-12 air bombs in Germany ???
  11. SEER
    SEER April 4 2018 01: 18
    0
    "The more nuclear powers there can be in the world, the greater the danger that we,
    Weitz added. "

    I remember, at one time there was one power, managed to become nuclear.
    I could not stand it, I applied it a couple of times.
    Then she entered the rage - the plan "The Unthinkable".
    So who was in danger?
    Those who have already tried it for themselves or those who have already intended?
    Then the plans were repeatedly processed - the essence was one, only the number of nuclear warheads changed. Here are those "afraid" to take "by the belt and the weaving". So that the balls with rollers in the skull fell into place. "DB!" (c) S. Lavrov
  12. Dam
    Dam April 4 2018 01: 24
    0
    It has been experimentally proved that RUSSIA any confrontation with P.inddostan is more profitable than the largest and brightest cooperation