Military Review

National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK

57
The American edition of National Interest was distinguished by another material from the “If Tomorrow's War” series. Usually affecting the issues of confrontation between the United States and Russia, the publication decided to fantasize about the “possible” war between Russia and China. The material is served in the form of "news from the future."


So, National Interest publishes a “letter” from 2020 of the year from the US ambassador to Japan to the head of the US State Department Mike Pompeo. In a letter, the American ambassador said that the war between China and the Russian Federation "begins on the territory of North Korea."

The author of the material is a retired US Navy captain, historian, John Kuen. And the material is clearly inspired by the author of the visit of the head of the North Korean state to Beijing. In his article, Captain Kuen writes that following the meeting between the leader of the DPRK and the chairman of the PRC, agreements were reached on denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula. These agreements were confirmed during the meeting of the head of the DPRK with the “South Korean President Moon” (Ban Ki-moon? - note “IN”).

From the material:
They agreed to eliminate the entire North Korean nuclear weapons and the withdrawal of American troops from the Korean Peninsula. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded to Kim, Moon and Trump. At the same time, Kim Jong-un leaves the post of the leader of the DPRK, sending a letter to Beijing with a request to send troops "for protection from the Russians." Russia is building up a military grouping in the Far East. Kim Jong-un on an armored train runs to Harbin. Russian troops are entering the DPRK, Russian submarines are attacking the Chinese fleet, and Russian cyber specialists are striking at Chinese networks. The Russian-Chinese war promises to be a long one.


National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK


Awesome calculations ...

It should be noted that such “predictions” in the American press are not rare. In the National Interest alone, what kind of “future wars” were not discussed ... And practically every one has Russia, which “invades somewhere”.
Photos used:
MO RF
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 3 2018 07: 38
    +11
    National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK
    And America will drown in radioactive waves crying bully
    1. Thrall
      Thrall April 3 2018 07: 41
      +32
      It is necessary to discuss such NI articles in the "Combat leaflet of a punitive psychologist", and not in smile
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 April 3 2018 07: 48
        +4
        Fantasy is delusional, of course, but how to prevent these "eagles" from going crazy?
        1. Sergey-svs
          Sergey-svs April 3 2018 08: 01
          +17
          Uchi, that writes "National Interest" - the true truth ... u will be so!yes By that time, we were already annexing the Baltic states, Banderostan and Moldova in the South-West direction; in the North - we will return the original Russian - Alaska, and after hoisting the Russian flag in Ulanbator, we will move all the power of the horse-tank-Buryat Putin hordes to the DPRK! tongue
          laughing laughing laughing
          1. bulvas
            bulvas April 3 2018 08: 06
            +4
            National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK


            Previously, it was not clear why Russia should invade the Baltic states, about which all Western shouted

            Then they explained that there is a “Suvalka corridor” for communication with the Kaliningrad region, which passes through Lithuania.

            Maybe soon we will find out something else interesting about the Korean Peninsula?

            Or is it the beginning of an action against the idea of ​​a gas pipeline through the DPRK to South Korea?

            1. Shurik70
              Shurik70 April 3 2018 16: 28
              0
              Quote: Sergey-svs
              By then, we already ... will move all the power of the horse-tank-Buryat Putin hordes to the DPRK! tongue

              To the aid of the DPRK and China in suppressing the last unfinished NATO troops.
          2. cniza
            cniza April 3 2018 08: 20
            +1
            Quote: rocket757
            Fantasy is delusional, of course, but how to prevent these "eagles" from going crazy?


            And why forbid, let them gush and scare themselves.
      2. The black
        The black April 3 2018 07: 55
        +3
        ..... and yet our scouts are spreading something there wassat .....
        1. cniza
          cniza April 3 2018 08: 18
          +1
          At least the laughing gas that acts on them like that.
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 3 2018 10: 51
          0
          Quote: Black
          ..... and yet our scouts are spreading something there wassat .....

          Talking mushrooms.
        3. volodimer
          volodimer April 3 2018 13: 01
          +1
          What does ours have to do with it? Judging by the arrival of the same nonsense as in 404, maybe mushrooms laughing
      3. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN April 3 2018 08: 40
        +2
        Quote: Thrall
        It is necessary to discuss such NI articles in the "Combat leaflet of a punitive psychologist", and not in

        But what if the foreign policy of one exclusive nuclear power is based on such “deep wet analyzes”?
        It’s just an American dream.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 April 3 2018 10: 36
          +2
          The main thing is that Schaub's American dream did not develop into vigorous nonsense!
          No, it's time for them to prescribe an antidote!
  2. Simon
    Simon April 3 2018 07: 41
    +2
    Some nonsense! Why do we fight with North Korea, I see no reason. And China does not need this, it has problems closer to the United States, not dreams. fool
    1. Lord_Bran
      Lord_Bran April 3 2018 07: 51
      +1
      Yes, and not on April 1, like ..
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 3 2018 07: 56
        +9
        retired US Navy captain; historian John Quen.
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 3 2018 07: 42
    +3
    Yelling from behind a high wall, where they go in dressing gowns and sometimes with OL. laughing
  4. Ankipelgygyrgyn
    Ankipelgygyrgyn April 3 2018 07: 42
    +1
    With such severe iksperdy states are guaranteed to lose. No options.
  5. Heterocapsa
    Heterocapsa April 3 2018 07: 44
    +2
    by 2020, the world will not be unipolar.
    And this forecast of mine is more credible than the war with China.
  6. Papandreou
    Papandreou April 3 2018 07: 45
    +3
    Maybe I should write something?
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic April 3 2018 07: 48
      0
      Write a novel and three novels lol and we will read! !! laughing
    2. Tersky
      Tersky April 3 2018 08: 40
      +2
      Quote: Papandreou
      Maybe I should write something?

      You won’t learn that way No. , a talent like that is absorbed with poppy milk and fresh marijuana smoke. yes
      1. volodimer
        volodimer April 3 2018 13: 06
        0
        Mushrooms !!! Do not forget the mushrooms, otherwise nonsense, oh, the masterpiece will not be sufficiently picky !!!!
    3. Sands Careers General
      Sands Careers General April 3 2018 11: 47
      +2
      Already a lot of things have been written, here is an example))

      The United Nations, as an organization, was dissolved in 2052, the minerals of the planet were coming to an end, and many small countries went bankrupt. The European Union and the oil-producing countries of the Middle East have entered a long war of attrition for the last remaining oil fields.

      At the end of 2053, the United States closed its borders due to the outbreak of the New Plague among the population, as well as the destruction of Tel Aviv in Israel by terrorists using nuclear weapons. At the beginning of 2054, the United States responded to the increased threat of nuclear war by creating the Vault Project. In the course of this project, funded by the sale of virtually worthless Treasury bonds to an increasingly ruined US government (inflation grew by leaps and bounds as the economy worsened), huge underground Shelters were created that could withstand the effects of a nuclear war or viral pandemics.

      In 2060, oil fields in the Middle East ran out, leading to the end of the Resource Wars. The European Union fell apart into many warring states that fought for the last crumbs of resources, and began to resemble Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire.

      In the winter of 2066, China invaded Alaska, intending to capture one of the last oil fields on Earth. The United States responded to the threat, but another 10 years passed before the conflict ended. In a desperate attempt to get the last resources, both powers captured the countries bordering them. The annexation by the United States of Canada ended in 2076. Canadian timber and oil provided raw materials to the US military, and Alaska was recaptured from the Chinese in January 2077.

      Fallout
  7. nivander
    nivander April 3 2018 07: 47
    0
    and why on the Korean zamlitsa?
    1. ProkletyiPirat
      ProkletyiPirat April 3 2018 13: 34
      0
      about a year ago, in a notebook in the "garbage" section, I’ve written such crazy nonsense (it was boring already good-for-nothinglaughing )
      as delirious musings:
      ? Is war between Russia and the United States possible? or between the Russian Federation and other countries where exactly will the Russian Federation act as a party to the attack?
      ------
      Suppose that a conflict begins between North Korea (hereinafter referred to as SK) and South Korea (hereinafter SK) with the support of the United States, or directly between northern and United States. Since North Korea has nuclear weapons, there is a chance that in the process of war, something unfavorable to the Russian Federation will happen to these weapons.
      1) a situation is possible when the United States seizes the nuclear weapons of the SK and launches it in the Russian Federation, and all blame is blamed on someone else (read SK).
      2) a situation is possible when the nuclear weapons of the UK detach in the territory of the UK but part of the Russian Federation will be infected.
      3) a situation is possible when the authorities of the UK will blackmail the Russian Federation with nuclear weapons and demand the provision of military assistance.
      In all cases, it is permissible to use nuclear weapons from the Russian Federation in the US Navy and partially in the territory of the South Caucasus / North Caucasus, this is permissible due to the fact that such use will reduce the territory of the Russian Federation exposed to radiation.
      But this option will lead to damage to relations between the Russian Federation and Japan \ SK \ SK \ China and other neighboring countries. What is disadvantageous for the Russian Federation.
      therefore it is most reasonable to spend army resources to destroy the US fleet, and block supplies to belligerent countries (SK and SK) in order to reduce their military resources (ability to fight) and, as a result, end the war.
      It is also possible to invade the territory of the UK in order to block and / or destroy and / or control objects dangerous to the Russian Federation.
  8. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 3 2018 07: 47
    0
    In my opinion, we will, together with North Korea and China America, set our brains before! fool
  9. Tarasios
    Tarasios April 3 2018 07: 56
    0
    An article in the National Interest is nonsense, kanesh, but it adds another smear to the portrait of "Russia-aggressor". Which was the purpose of the article ...
  10. cobalt
    cobalt April 3 2018 07: 57
    +3
    Yes, I will instantly give the same forecast for the United States for 2022, they will be simultaneously attacked by zombies, vampires, werewolves, 3 year-olds and 7 kinkongs, well, Haiti at the same time.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 April 3 2018 08: 04
      +1
      Quote: cobalt
      Well, Haiti at the same time.


      Just not Haiti !!! Horror, endless horror !!!

      But in fact - well, at least some justification for why we have Korean land or not ??? In my opinion - even if they pay extra for it - absolutely not needed ...
  11. jaha
    jaha April 3 2018 07: 59
    0
    diagnosis for a sore head - amputation
  12. cariperpaint
    cariperpaint April 3 2018 08: 15
    0
    what a nightmare))) this stupidity in my eyes everyone else has surpassed in recent years) they made my day)))
  13. sleeve
    sleeve April 3 2018 08: 18
    +1
    Do we have a medical publication here? To familiarize yourself with the "mental" mood, I propose introducing the editorial board of VO into a permanent section with similar opuses from there and merging culturally into the general viewing. You can also comment (but it is better not to). And to make this blinker a subject of discussion seems to me irrational.
    1. volodimer
      volodimer April 3 2018 13: 12
      0
      As in the old joke: "Well, you must agree, colleague, oh @ wonderful performance!" Neighing, but to do a separate section for wo ... They do not deserve it.
  14. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 3 2018 08: 22
    0
    The mattress covers vang, having eaten mushrooms from the reserves of Gingema! Glitches mixed with mantras!
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky April 3 2018 10: 29
      +1
      Quote: sib.ataman
      The mattress covers vang, having eaten mushrooms from the reserves of Gingema!

      The fact of the matter is that they did not get bite and even had nothing to smoke. This can only be written during the period of exacerbation of evil withdrawal.
  15. arhPavel
    arhPavel April 3 2018 08: 37
    0
    For us, these articles seem crazy, but they are only written from the American paradigm of thinking. They cannot think differently. It’s like “on the thief and the hat is on fire” and they and us see the rest of the world, looking through the crooked glasses of their value system.
    They cannot get used to what we think differently. We look like them .. here comes the break of the template. If the Russians looked like blacks or Chinese, then the Anglo-Saxons would take us more calmly.
  16. Sergey985
    Sergey985 April 3 2018 08: 38
    0
    Weak little article. The theme of American aircraft carriers is not disclosed at all. Shredded edition.
  17. Azazelo
    Azazelo April 3 2018 08: 38
    0
    Only in your dreams
  18. Cananecat
    Cananecat April 3 2018 08: 46
    0
    Article not of April 1 in NI? If Russia is exchanged with Amerka in the text, then a very plausible scenario is obtained ...)))
    Although it seems to me that April 1 at NI, the date is year-round.
  19. d ^ Amir
    d ^ Amir April 3 2018 08: 47
    +1
    it was already ... nothing new ....
    1. karish
      karish April 3 2018 08: 50
      0
      Quote: d ^ Amir
      it was already ... nothing new ....

      1. d ^ Amir
        d ^ Amir April 3 2018 08: 53
        0
        Well, this one is sanctified, so to speak !!! like the phrase about permanent interests in the absence of permanent allies ...
  20. Amateur
    Amateur April 3 2018 08: 58
    0
    Previously, only meteorologists (like “it’s sunny today”, although it’s raining outside) used to make forecasts, and now Veronika Krasheninnikova is on Zvezda and the National Interest, with the same success
  21. Altona
    Altona April 3 2018 09: 31
    +1
    Quote: Thrall
    It is necessary to discuss such NI articles in the "Combat leaflet of a punitive psychologist", and not in

    ----------------------------------------
    I will try to discuss such a fantastic version. China, like the United States, is pushing its population to the east coast, and several strikes with nuclear weapons (a popular nuclear bomb) on this coast will deprive China of infrastructure. Secondly, China is unlikely to get involved in the adventurous undertaking of a war with Russia, bearing in mind that the Japanese used to pile on them at the time, and then the Russians came and put the Japanese on, moreover, in 10 days. It does not make sense to discuss diplomacy at all, it is obviously fantastic.
  22. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 3 2018 09: 38
    +1
    By 2020, the United States entering the war with Mexico and will lose a third of its territory
  23. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 3 2018 09: 38
    +2
    National Interest
    Quiet. Do not stop the American publication from dreaming. For them, Russia against China is much better than Russia against the United States. Was the article accidentally published on April 1?
  24. Berkut24
    Berkut24 April 3 2018 09: 58
    +1
    In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China on the territory of the DPRK

    This is the National Interest of the United States. So that all enemies soak each other without the participation of the hegemon.
  25. svp67
    svp67 April 3 2018 10: 42
    0
    National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK
    Well, it’s somehow not interesting, but WHERE are interference in the elections in a democratic DPRK and a very democratic PRC, where are the “suffocating gas clubs” “Nofichyok”, where are the “holes” from the Russian “Drills”? No, not interesting ...
  26. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 3 2018 11: 04
    +1
    What are you guys smoking there ......... lol
  27. flicker
    flicker April 3 2018 12: 36
    +1
    National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China in the territory of the DPRK
    Well, everything, the roof finally went: they gave vent to fantasies, then their same-sex marriages have become almost the norm, then Russia and China will self-destruct.
    The blue dream of the geldings: Russia and China will destroy each other, just so that the geldings again become hegemons. laughing
  28. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin April 3 2018 12: 48
    0
    In the National Interest alone, what kind of “future wars” were not discussed ... And practically in every figure appears Russia, which is “invading somewhere”.

    Dreamers, most likely Russia and China will be on the side of the DPRK, as it used to be, from which the Americans have very hard memories. These memories do not allow them to still calm down!
  29. prior
    prior April 3 2018 14: 17
    +1
    "National Interest: In 2020, Russia will enter the war with China on the territory of the DPRK"
    And the "Novice" is not even poisonous, but very funny and inhibitory gas. It is very common in the West.
    It is possible that in 2020 Russia will enter the war with China, but it is certain that by this time the United States and Europe will already be Russian colonies, and conscripts from these colonies will serve in the troops participating in hostilities.
  30. Andrey Panov
    Andrey Panov April 3 2018 14: 57
    0
    Dreams, dreams, they would only heat the heat with the wrong hands ...
  31. Hiller
    Hiller April 3 2018 22: 57
    0
    To whistle - not toss bags! Oh, these storytellers ...
  32. razved
    razved April 3 2018 22: 58
    0
    Previously, this publication could still be read, but now they give out one nonsense more delirious than another ...
  33. nod739
    nod739 April 4 2018 11: 34
    0
    pickled mushrooms they smoke there, however