Military Review

The Russian Foreign Ministry has published 13 questions to the OPCW in connection with the "Skrypal case"

30
The Russian Foreign Ministry sent to the OPCW a list of 13 issues related to the “Skripal case”, reports RIA News.




The Foreign Ministry’s leadership, in particular, wonders what information the British authorities are transmitting to the organization’s technical secretariat, and whether the OPCW is informed about how the investigation of the incident in the United Kingdom is progressing.

In addition, diplomats want to know whether the technical secretariat intends to share with the executive committee of the organization, which also includes Russia, information received from the British side.

Specifically, what are the British asking to confirm the OPCW's technical secretary: is it only the fact of the use of a nerve agent, or is it a “newcomer” type according to the western classification?
interested in the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Moscow is also asked to clarify "which experts traveled to the scene of the incident," and "in which laboratories the samples will be analyzed, and whether the procedure for collecting evidence complies with the fundamental principles of the organization."

Recall the incident with the poisoning of the former GRU officer Sergey Skrypal and his daughter Yulia occurred in early March in the British Salisbury. London accused the Russian authorities of poisoning and refused to cooperate with Moscow on the investigation. Russia categorically denied the charges.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 2 2018 09: 27
    +4
    The British have nothing against us, only unfounded accusations, and therefore do not voice to Russia the progress of the investigation.
    Here is a list of these 13 questions:
    1. What kind of assistance did London request from the OPCW Technical Secretariat?

    2. Does the OPCW Technical Secretariat intend to share, in the established manner, with the Executive Board, including, of course, with Russia, the information that the British provide to the Technical Secretariat when interacting under Article 38 (e) of Article VIII of the Convention (technical assessment in the implementation of the provisions of this Convention, including the assessment of scheduled and non-listed chemicals)?

    3. Did the British side provide the Technical Secretariat with any additional information on its own national investigation (operational, medical, legal, etc.)?

    4. What specifically are the British asking for confirmation from the OPCW Technical Secretariat: is it just the fact that a nerve agent is used, or is it a “novice” type according to the Western classification?

    5. What kind of data and material evidence did the British make available to the Technical Secretariat (sample samples, results of their own analysis of samples, other evidence)?

    6. Who led the OPCW team of experts visiting the UK? What experts are included in its composition? How much time did they work? Who did you interact with?

    7. What was the sampling procedure, was the fundamental principle of the CWC observed during investigations (the so-called “chain of custody”)?

    8. In which certified laboratories will the samples received by the OPCW Technical Secretariat during the visit of its experts to the UK be analyzed?

    9. How long will the OPCW Technical Secretariat need to prepare an appropriate opinion?

    10. Did the OPCW Technical Secretariat agree to the UK disclosing the investigation materials to the EU countries (according to available information, France joined the investigation in full format)?

    11. Has France notified the OPCW Technical Secretariat of its involvement in the technical assistance requested by the UK?

    12. Did France transmit the materials of its own investigation (if any) to the OPCW Technical Secretariat?

    13. Can the OPCW Technical Secretariat provide Russia with French investigation materials (if any) to review its results? If not, why?
    1. 210ox
      210ox April 2 2018 10: 03
      +2
      Another "White Helmets" ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 2 2018 10: 12
        +2
        Quote: 210ox
        Another "White Helmets" ...

        In this case, "White gas masks ..."
    2. svp67
      svp67 April 2 2018 10: 15
      +6
      Quote: Spartanez300
      The British have nothing against us, one unfounded accusations

      Our people, with every enemy, first of all learned to fight with a JOKE:
      “Lavrov comes to Putin and informs that Teresa May was raped in Salisbury at night. Putin asks: is Russia accused or only me?”
    3. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be April 2 2018 10: 29
      +1
      31.03.1820:30
      Questions of the Russian Side to France on the “Skripals case” fabricated by Great Britain against Russia
      http://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_
      publisher / cKNonkJE02Bw / content / id / 3150139

      31.03.1819:00
      Questions of the Russian Side to Great Britain on the “Skripals case” fabricated against Russia
      http://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_
      publisher / cKNonkJE02Bw / content / id / 3150129
    4. a housewife
      a housewife April 2 2018 11: 55
      +3
      Well, now the questions need to be added - how exactly did the poison come in a bag of buckwheat, in what form, when did they eat that buckwheat, did they cook it or, like chickens, pecked with raw materials? Did you sprinkle a handle on the door with buckwheat or are these two different poisons? The more they say, the dumber.
    5. Vladimir Ter-Odiyants
      Vladimir Ter-Odiyants April 2 2018 12: 26
      0
      If it were, be calm immediately published and ostracized. In general, Russia is passive. Why, for example, does not convene an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council?
  2. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 2 2018 09: 29
    +1
    So the Kolka Powell didn’t shake a test tube for investigations
    1. novel66
      novel66 April 2 2018 09: 43
      +3
      that's for sure, set the tone for years to come, though now they’re barking even without a test tube
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather April 2 2018 09: 44
      +6
      duck like Bonded buckwheat gluttonized ... (damn it ... I also chopped yesterday ... I have krants.
      1. Nikolay Fedorov
        Nikolay Fedorov April 2 2018 11: 54
        +4
        Quote: Dead Day
        duck like Bonded buckwheat gluttonized ... (damn it ... I also chopped yesterday ... I have krants.

        Did you chop English buckwheat or Russian? That's where the squiggle is hiding! Kranty - only from English.
      2. a housewife
        a housewife April 2 2018 11: 57
        +3
        you will live again. laughing
      3. Evil543
        Evil543 April 2 2018 12: 28
        +2
        Constipation only laughing
      4. stariy
        stariy April 3 2018 16: 00
        +1
        Quote: Dead Day
        .. (damn it ... I also chopped it yesterday ... I got cranes.

        In our cafe, buckwheat porridge is served by a "newcomer" ... the cook is creative, porridge for grab good
  3. svp67
    svp67 April 2 2018 09: 31
    +1
    The Russian Foreign Ministry has published 13 questions to the OPCW in connection with the "Skrypal case"
    This is the third group of questions, but WHERE are ANSWERS?
    1. Dormidont
      Dormidont April 2 2018 09: 32
      +2
      The answer was published in the fable of I.A. Krylova "The Wolf and the Lamb"
    2. novel66
      novel66 April 2 2018 09: 44
      +3
      Well. in fact, the expulsion of diplomats can be considered to some extent the answer
  4. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 April 2 2018 09: 33
    +1
    The Russian Foreign Ministry sent a list of 13 questions to the OPCW

    Voice in the wilderness. No one will even think to answer the questions posed. And if they moo something, then such a balcony that they will feel sick.
    How many questions have we raised before the commission investigating flight MH-17 ??? Well. And nothing has changed.
    Typical ordering in both cases.
    1. stayer
      stayer April 2 2018 09: 42
      +3
      Quote: Corsair0304
      The Russian Foreign Ministry sent a list of 13 questions to the OPCW

      Voice in the wilderness. No one will even think to answer the questions posed. And if they moo something, then such a balcony that they will feel sick.
      How many questions have we raised before the commission investigating flight MH-17 ??? Well. And nothing has changed.
      Typical ordering in both cases.

      Not certainly in that way. Russia is a full member of the OPCW. No wonder they ask questions. This England may not answer the questions posed to him, and for this they will not be anything. And the organization is obliged to answer. Or Russia is simply blocking participation (financial, legal, specialists, etc.). This is fraught with the resumption of production of chemical weapons.
  5. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber April 2 2018 09: 39
    +2
    Interesting situation for shaving laughing Save face, now, does not work. So, you need to wait, from them, for the next dirty tricks.
    Shit will be, with a vengeance. However, in a different way, they do not know how.
    I hope our Foreign Ministry has purchased umbrellas and raincoats in full laughing
  6. Ingvar0401
    Ingvar0401 April 2 2018 09: 55
    +2
    Quote: stayer
    Quote: Corsair0304
    The Russian Foreign Ministry sent a list of 13 questions to the OPCW

    Voice in the wilderness. No one will even think to answer the questions posed. And if they moo something, then such a balcony that they will feel sick.
    How many questions have we raised before the commission investigating flight MH-17 ??? Well. And nothing has changed.
    Typical ordering in both cases.

    Not certainly in that way. Russia is a full member of the OPCW. No wonder they ask questions. This England may not answer the questions posed to him, and for this they will not be anything. And the organization is obliged to answer. Or Russia is simply blocking participation (financial, legal, specialists, etc.). This is fraught with the resumption of production of chemical weapons.

    Did the UN answer many questions? Wada? They never answered and will not answer now. Correctly wrote "the voice of one crying in the wilderness" ...
  7. Fedorov
    Fedorov April 2 2018 09: 57
    0
    Who the hell is he for? Forget it in a month.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 2 2018 10: 15
    +2
    Questions of course need to be asked. When asked the questions of England - there are no answers and is not expected. The OPCW may possibly answer some questions, but who will guarantee that these will be true and unbiased answers. It is enough to recall the use of chemical weapons in Syria and the reaction of this organization without going to the place of use.
  9. Navy7981
    Navy7981 April 2 2018 10: 22
    +3
    Most likely Skripal has nothing to do with it, he is just a pawn. The reasons are the Northern Sea Route, new weapons, the construction of bridges and factories, the failure to accept Euro values, and the country's own opinion finally.
    How is it that some Russians do what they consider necessary without asking advanced ghouls ...
  10. Rostislav
    Rostislav April 2 2018 10: 30
    0
    It is necessary not only to send requests to the authorities, but to cover their actions as widely as possible in the Western press, including stupid mooing of the English instead of answers to specific questions. Not everyone there is completely duped and such actions will help them understand the essence of what is happening.
  11. Kerensky
    Kerensky April 2 2018 10: 56
    +1
    14. A soft enough piece of paper on which we printed our questions?
  12. Zubr
    Zubr April 2 2018 11: 02
    +3
    And when the 2018 World Cup begins, what else will they come up with? smile Dear football fans, do not believe this corrupt girl in the face of the UK & USA government and other corrupt politicians like them. Come, you will be fed, watered and put to bed. It will be necessary, we will teach you hugs with bears and play the balalaika. Let's just say, Let's hit the bourgeois lawlessness with our ploretarian consciousness. smile good drinks
    1. a housewife
      a housewife April 2 2018 12: 00
      +2
      for me - so let them sit at home, the British - a headache. And then after all, they themselves will intentionally poison someone here, then it will certainly become clear to everyone what kind of villains these Russians are.
  13. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz April 2 2018 22: 18
    +2
    “There are too many idiots in the world asking the right questions” ... I don’t remember whose statement, but London has it clearly in the language ...
  14. 1536
    1536 April 3 2018 15: 49
    +1
    Fantomas to the question "who are you?" replied: "Ha Ha Ha!"
    By the way, questions to the Canadian WADA, which turned out to be a world organization, were also in the same vein. I remember in English lessons we taught what types of questions are in English: general, alternative, special, dividing, etc. Someone, apparently, was lucky to ask the English to improve them in spoken English.