Military Review

Yakovenko: British special services are behind the "Skrypal case"

53
Russia's ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko, called the “Skripal case” a provocation carried out by British intelligence services, reports RIA News.




They refuse to cooperate with us, they do not provide us with any invoice. That, in fact, leads us to the conclusion that this is a provocation of the special services,
Yakovenko said in an interview with NTV.

He noted that London is now “in a very difficult position” for two reasons. The first is exit from the EU.

If you noticed in Brussels, when the statement on the Violin was made, the Brexit theme did not sound at all. At this time, very important agreements were reached on further negotiations between the UK and the countries of the European Union. That is, the topic has gone into the shadows, and the British in this case accepted almost all the conditions of the European Union,
told the ambassador.

The second reason is related to the role of Britain "in the Western Union." According to Yakovenko, after the approval of the concept of national security, London set a course for leadership in deterring "Russian aggression."

In order to restrain Russia, a powerful provocation is needed in order for this position to be supported by both the parliament and the people. This is the wild provocation, most likely, arranged by the British in order to get the support of parliament and the people,
added the head of the diplomatic mission.

According to him, London will not be able to classify information on the case.

I am sure that Russia will not release the British from the legal field. The British will have to answer. We are now just choosing a method, which way we will go,
concluded Yakovenko.

Recall that the former GRU officer Sergey Skripal and his daughter Julia were poisoned at the beginning of March in Salisbury. The British authorities accused Russia of poisoning. Moscow categorically denies this accusation.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Anarchist
    Anarchist April 1 2018 17: 00
    +8
    Ugh, damn it, said nothing new! Diplomats and politicians repeat each other ... Like a mantra ...
    Could please the "red word", for a change! For example: the British authorities suck out more and more arguments from the "finger" ... From the "finger" of American curators. While the “Bear” has not yet moved away from hibernation and sucks its paw, the “lion” sucks the “finger” of the “bald eagle”!
    1. Thrall
      Thrall April 1 2018 17: 03
      +18
      He is an ambassador, not a buffoon.
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist April 1 2018 17: 09
        +6
        Quote: Thrall
        He is an ambassador, not a buffoon.

        Konoshenkov is a general, not a jester at all, but his pearls disagree on quotes! Just one "Aviamatka" what is it worth ...!?!
        1. For example
          For example April 1 2018 17: 14
          +16
          Quote: Anarchist
          Ugh, damn it, said nothing new!

          The ambassador said a lot. Just need to hear.
          A year ago, London was in the backyards. In the world media there were more Ukraine and Honduras. Now the situation has changed. London has become a leader. London has put the EU cancer. For example, the ambassador said this. hi
          1. Anarchist
            Anarchist April 1 2018 17: 21
            +2
            Quote: For example
            The ambassador said a lot. Just need to hear.
            A year ago, London was in the backyards. In the world media there were more Ukraine and Honduras. Now the situation has changed. London has become a leader. London has put the EU cancer. For example, the ambassador said this.

            He said almost nothing! He only issued an investigation, and there are much convincing opinions about the reasons:
            newsinfo.ru/articles/2018-03-17 ...
            “... That is, we are talking here primarily about the economic interests of Washington, and the interests of Europe - as is customary for the“ world hegemon ”- somewhere in the margins. America is interested in increasing Europe’s dependence on its gas or on gas coming from sources that in turn depend on the United States. In this regard, Nord Stream 2 is completely unprofitable for Washington. And if so, they will continue to fight with him, even though the interests of the United States and its main European partner, Germany, clearly diverge in this matter. ... It would seem, what does the "Skripal affair" have to do with it? And to whom is it most beneficial? Who needs to once again expose Russia and its leadership as a fiend of hell, which not only kills objectionable citizens, but can, without hesitation, endanger the lives of hundreds of Britons ... "
            1. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny April 1 2018 18: 37
              +5
              Well, as usual in your repertoire, hi Sasha, I live near the city with the sonorous (for you) name Kropotkin. Do you want to bring flowers? laughing I apologize to the administration, if you consider it a flood.
          2. dorz
            dorz April 1 2018 17: 38
            +7
            The toxic agent, which is called in London, belongs to the family of organophosphorus toxic agents of a nerve agent, an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase. There are several hundred such OMs. Their first developers were German chemists. It was in Germany that OMs were used against people during the First World War. After World War II, German chemists were exported to the United States. So, Phosphorus-based OBs kill a person in minutes.

            Thus, London has to decide - how to complete this story? To declare Skripals recovered means to admit that there was simply no fatal OM.
            1. sxfRipper
              sxfRipper April 1 2018 20: 06
              +5
              Exactly! Since the military department of the Moscow Art Theater, I remember that Vx poisons in a couple of minutes. And here they tell us that a more effective tool was used. The ends do not meet. Or they poisoned Skripals with household dichlorvos (also an organophosphorus), which is why they are still alive.
        2. vovanpain
          vovanpain April 1 2018 18: 06
          +10
          Quote: Anarchist
          Konoshenkov is a general, not a jester at all, but his pearls disagree on quotes

          Sanya Zdarova Be! hi Konashenkov’s position in the Ministry of Defense is the same as that of Zakharova’s in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, they are allowed to laugh, the ambassador must think what to say. He is the face of the state in the host country. yes He would also be pleased to say: “The British prime minister is just a pet dog of Washington and the intelligence agencies work in close connection with the US intelligence agencies and the stench comes from these countries on this matter.” In principle, he could poke that in the faceLet them prove that they have nothing to do with it. drinks hi
          1. Monster_Fat
            Monster_Fat April 2 2018 14: 25
            +1
            What is "this"? The smoke marker shown in the photo? winked
    2. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 April 1 2018 17: 05
      +8
      I have one feeling that diplomacy has smoothly migrated to the Internet and the media?
      Instead of working on "special" channels, there are competitions - Who will give more interviews!
      For what then ..... contain embassies? Let on the Internet - correspond, and we honor!
      1. For example
        For example April 1 2018 17: 18
        +6
        Quote: Hunter 2
        I have one feeling that diplomacy has smoothly migrated to the Internet and the media?

        I think one and a few.
        My friend, you migrated to the Internet. The whole world is here for you. So you draw the appropriate conclusions.
        Surely you have received information without the Internet and the media? Did you receive a report from the Foreign Ministry by mail? If so, why the hell do you need the Internet and this site?
        1. Hunter 2
          Hunter 2 April 1 2018 17: 39
          +6
          Quote: For example
          Quote: Hunter 2
          I have one feeling that diplomacy has smoothly migrated to the Internet and the media?

          I think one and a few.
          My friend, you migrated to the Internet. The whole world is here for you. So you draw the appropriate conclusions.
          Surely you have received information without the Internet and the media? Did you receive a report from the Foreign Ministry by mail? If so, why the hell do you need the Internet and this site?

          I'm afraid to “think” you do it badly!
          The activity of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is carried out in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Regulation on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, internal documentation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, under the leadership of the President of the Russian Federation.
          The international rules for diplomatic relations and diplomatic etiquette are set forth in the Vienna Convention.
          It’s not interesting for you to chew on how diplomatic activity should be carried out, I’m afraid you still won’t understand!
          I - NEED to know the official position of My Country! Expressed accordingly, and not the private opinion of the person, through his interview, albeit in the rank of ambassador!
      2. You Vlad
        You Vlad April 1 2018 17: 22
        +4
        Quote: Hunter 2
        I have one feeling that diplomacy has smoothly migrated to the Internet and the media?
        Instead of working on "special" channels, there are competitions - Who will give more interviews!

        This is called the information war. yes hi
        Quote: Hunter 2
        For what then ..... contain embassies? Let on the Internet - correspond, and we honor!

        This is written to inform the population of warring countries, so to speak.
      3. hydrox
        hydrox April 1 2018 17: 42
        +4
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Let on the Internet - correspond, and we honor!

        You offend :: diplomacy is taking its course, and the open air on the square is its own and you never know what the demos are yelling at !? On the square, the attitude of the demos to the state-wu is formed, and on each square - to their own, and diplomacy takes its course and the “gladiators” diplomats can only quickly and quickly calculate the ratio of “thumbs down” to “thumbs up” - because defeat will mean resignation fakebritov! lol
    3. Baloo
      Baloo April 1 2018 17: 11
      +6
      Quote: Anarchist
      Ugh, damn it, said nothing new! Diplomats and politicians repeat each other ... Like a mantra ...
      Could please the "red word", for a change!

      He said the gist. A diplomat must tell the truth, but nowhere is it written that the whole truth. Briefly said the essence, while leaving a riddle so that the opponents are worried.
      I would venture to suggest that no one poisoned the violins. A preparation for general anesthesia was injected through clothing or in an open area of ​​the skin, then with a brush where necessary it was anointed with one of the harmless components of the “novice”, that’s the whole performance. Used convulsively, with poor illiterate ressure, in connection with the events in Syria, which will soon be discussed. I mean not only captured British and Americans, but also documents captured in eastern Ghout that are being worked on. The GDP has already been asked for assistance, but the GDP replied that the captured Europeans are in the competence of the Syrian secret services. We are waiting for the next performance. The US ambassador is already babbling about the need to build relations with Russia. And only the naglitsy got into an argument, how long is it? ?
      1. Terenin
        Terenin April 1 2018 17: 28
        +6
        Quote: Balu
        Used frantically, with poor illiterate directing,

        Obviously, they hope that until the World Cup is over Russia will be accommodating, and it will be possible to taxi back, in which case, promising Russia not to "stir up the water." But this is only when they are “squeezed into a corner”. If he was wrong, this World Cup is on the one hand, but on the other hand, these are the conditions for joining the league of superpowers. Here the "maroon beret" must be really earned (and in the end, according to their rules - to shoot) yes .
      2. hydrox
        hydrox April 1 2018 17: 52
        +2
        They issued a good text, but the demotivator is super! laughing
        Not the Secretary of State, but a sloppy cat with a gangster face - and what more can be expected from such a hari ??
        1. Senior manager
          Senior manager April 1 2018 19: 04
          +1
          Quote: hydrox
          and what else can be expected from such a hari ??

          The aforementioned facial expression in this case is fully consistent with the theory of Comrade Lombroso. The texture does not differ from the content. So are the Theresa girls.
          1. Lelek
            Lelek April 1 2018 23: 05
            +2
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            So are the Theresa girls.

            hi
            Well, this freya is associated with the scavenger vulture. bully
    4. AST576
      AST576 April 1 2018 17: 15
      +2
      Yes, he could not say anything new, Sanya, because he’s sitting on his salary ... Come on, if you will, will I say? All this is a performance for us ordinary mortals, they, the powers that be, have already divided everything ... And " ours ", and not ours ....... wink
    5. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 1 2018 17: 21
      +7
      Quote: Anarchist
      ... British authorities suck from the "finger" ... From the "finger" ... "Bear" ... sucks its paw, the "lion" sucks the "finger" of the "bald eagle"

      Um ... I thought it’s so good that you are not an ambassador ... request
      1. volodya
        volodya April 1 2018 17: 41
        +2
        The ambassador said, "they are the citizens of the Naglits!"
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack April 1 2018 17: 45
          +4
          Quote: volodya
          The ambassador said

          Poke the buttons more accurately, for me your "answer" - why? wink
          1. volodya
            volodya April 1 2018 17: 49
            +1
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Poke the buttons more accurately, for me your "answer" - why?

            I will try.
    6. Vadivak
      Vadivak April 1 2018 17: 33
      +2
      Quote: .........
      British secret services are behind the Skripal affair


      Also me Binom Newton
    7. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 1 2018 20: 39
      +1
      Quote: Anarchist
      Diplomats and politicians repeat each other

      And what to repeat if the information is zero. Even the fact of "poisoning" is not confirmed by anything. On the other hand, unlike mediocre politicians, diplomats are people who answer the question "I'm sorry, what did you say?" always answer carefully "you need to think." lol Although diplomats are taught at special educational institutions, where are they taught at politicians?
  2. Vita vko
    Vita vko April 1 2018 17: 05
    +3
    The British will have to answer. Now we just choose the methodology, which way we will go
    Let's hope that this will not be another “Olympic technique” like WADA. The OPCW has more than once been talking about the United States and NATO on the issue of chemical weapons in Syria.
    1. Vard
      Vard April 1 2018 17: 10
      +1
      In any case, they will have to answer specifically ... The French were pulled up ... It won’t end in good ...
      1. hydrox
        hydrox April 1 2018 17: 57
        +1
        This is just good: on what basis should we tighten the french jackets, even if we are not informed according to the Convention ?? But they will have to explain this fact ...
        This is no accident, and the service jackets help them crawl out of some ass that we weren’t told about (or maybe they won’t say) ...
  3. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 1 2018 17: 08
    +1
    The British special services are just the fruit body of the fungus visible to the eye. At the same time, the mycelium itself is not visible and entangles the earth for kilometers
  4. svp67
    svp67 April 1 2018 17: 09
    +2
    Yakovenko: British special services are behind the "Skrypal case"
    And the ears because of the Ocean, aren't they sticking out behind them?
    Now we just choose the methodology, which way we will go,
    That’s the problem: while we “calve” and choose something there, we METHODALLY “cover up” and “smear” ... We do not have ready-made forms of counteraction against such “force majeure” cases. And that's bad
    1. cniza
      cniza April 1 2018 17: 13
      +1
      While attacking the crowd, you have to react chaotically, but gradually we will line up everyone in the queue and each will receive his own.
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 1 2018 17: 18
        +1
        Quote: cniza
        While being attacked by a crowd, you have to react chaotically,
        The crowd must be forced to interfere with each other, and do it quickly, otherwise it will simply be trampled, and randomness in actions leads to death.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek April 1 2018 23: 15
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      That is the problem, that while we are “calving” and choosing something there, we METHODALLY “smear” and “smear” them.

      hi
      How is it, how is it? Look, despite the dirty tricks that they suit us, it turns out to be very respected and even inclined to be friends with us. But now the question arises, do we need such friendship?
  5. askort154
    askort154 April 1 2018 17: 32
    +1
    Who, who, and intelligence and diplomats should always have at least two answers. One for the public (media), the other for domestic consumption. By the way, in England, intelligence is subordinate to the Foreign Ministry. Therefore, what the media hysterically presents to us is all "noodles on our ears." Realities will manifest themselves for a long time and little noticeable.
    1. Terenin
      Terenin April 1 2018 18: 06
      +3
      Who, who, and intelligence and diplomats should always have at least two answers.
      Welcome hi Of course, the principle must act here - do no harm to your country. As with the release of hostages, it is impossible to transmit real information to the media, which the terrorists also monitor, until the end of the special operation. The public is one thing, it does not have the function of duty and responsibility, and acting in the interests of the state is necessary to think about.
  6. Mimohod
    Mimohod April 1 2018 17: 37
    +2
    Yakovenko: British special services are behind the "Skrypal case"
    Whoever doubts that the Anglo-Saxons are old provocateurs and poisoners - the history of this is confirmed by the wild and crazy resonance due to one traitor no one needed (for Western political freaks it turned out to be necessary) which even seems to be poisoned, especially blasphemously against the background of the Kemerovo tragedy , the West showed firsthand its long-drawn grimace appearance .....
  7. APASUS
    APASUS April 1 2018 17: 56
    +4
    Here are a few questions about this:
    1 Actually, this provocation was planned and carried out by the British intelligence services, because without the actions of the Americans, nothing is done in the world. They could have put Theresa May blind, simply using her authority for a confident statement.
    You will learn the handwriting, rake coals with the wrong hands.
    2 In Syria, they found something and the security services did not understand the further course of the Russians’ actions,
    preemptive strike.
  8. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD April 1 2018 18: 27
    +4
    Now we just choose the methodology, which way we will go,
    Comrade Yakovenko speaks well, he speaks correctly ... But things are still there .. You can choose such a thing until a new dirty trick begins, this business will lose its relevance and you will again have to "choose a technique" ..
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 1 2018 20: 52
      +1
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      it will be necessary again to "choose a technique."

      What do you suggest? Shut up the western media, or the English prime minister? It will not work, even if they are crushed by facts. On the other hand, should there be methods "for Kostya Saprykin"? For example, Zheglov found, not very of course, but it worked perfectly. I think that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs also has something left to let the British drop a little in guano. With jackals the only way.
  9. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 1 2018 19: 34
    +1
    In order to restrain Russia, a powerful provocation is needed in order for this position to be supported by both the parliament and the people. This is the wild provocation, most likely, arranged by the British in order to get the support of parliament and the people,

    Captain Evidence ... and then we, blind stupid kittens, did not understand this at all ... wassat
  10. askme
    askme April 1 2018 19: 53
    0
    Well done! The first emotional wave subsided. We paused ... There is confusion in the camp of the enemy, there is no unity ... Now that we have begun to seriously bazaar, we are dealing a counter-information blow of well-founded charges! It is according to the laws of psychology. Learned ...
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 1 2018 20: 55
      +1
      Quote: askme
      There is confusion in the camp of the enemy, there is no unity

      Yeah, there is no unity. Half of Europe and the states sent Russian diplomats, so simply, due to lack of unity. When it comes to Russia, the West is always united as never before, along with its pugs of course.
      1. askme
        askme April 1 2018 21: 06
        0
        Well? Where is the contradiction? First we read, then we oppose. Unity - NO.
        1. Cossack 471
          Cossack 471 April 1 2018 22: 04
          0
          Here is the case. when we all the time in the role of the defenders. did not deliver any preemptive strikes. We could use their advisers. captured in eastern ghouta. Yes, and gas. this smelly english.
          1. askme
            askme April 1 2018 22: 34
            0
            You decide for yourself who specifically attacks us and from whom we are defending. As well as our goals, what exactly do we want both tactically and strategically in the context of this situation. Then everything will fall into place and better than our ministries are working out while no one has proposed strategies.

            One situation is when we want to intimidate scum by becoming even bigger scum (through the breaking of their global media and through the voices of their allies) or if we really want to win in a long-term campaign. Despite the fact that all moves are recorded and replayed, nothing can be fixed ...
        2. Orionvit
          Orionvit April 1 2018 23: 12
          +1
          Quote: askme
          Well? Where is the contradiction? First we read, then we oppose. Unity - NO.

          You probably write one thing, but think about yours. What is written is read. What do you mean there about the lack of unity in Europe, only you know one thing. In the meantime, they are opposing Russia on a united front.
          1. askme
            askme April 1 2018 23: 16
            +1
            Here either your vision is distorted, or you are not in the subject. A third of the EU did not support England. Moreover, some presidents, the same Zeman, PUBLICALLY very clearly criticized her for the fact that she puts speculation, and not evidence or even the semblance of facts.

            Thus, the lack of unity in the EU’s position is a fact. Which is recognized by the Western press as well, and not just our media. The rest is your speculation.
  11. Raasmus_
    Raasmus_ April 1 2018 21: 56
    0
    Captain obvious
  12. PValery53
    PValery53 April 2 2018 00: 06
    0
    For the notorious intrigues of puffy Anglo-Saxons, they must have been dragged for a long time by the muzzle over the bumps. They completely lost fear on their protected island.
  13. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 2 2018 01: 43
    +3
    I am sure that Russia will not release the British from the legal field. The British will have to answer. We are now just choosing a method, which way we will go,

    It would certainly be good, and that the words do not diverge from the deed.
  14. notingem
    notingem April 2 2018 10: 11
    +1
    And I thought that the Templars were behind the Skripal affair. But it turns out British intelligence