Commander in Chief of the Navy: by 2020, the fleet will receive about fifty ships and vessels

76
About 50 ships and vessels will be included in the combat structure of the Naval fleet Russia until 2020, said the commander in chief of the Russian Navy Vladimir Korolev.

Commander in Chief of the Navy: by 2020, the fleet will receive about fifty ships and vessels




The shipbuilding program 2018-2020 will be fully implemented - this is not even subject to any doubt. <...> We will definitely receive and commission during this period both nuclear submarine missile cruisers with ballistic missiles to intercept the submarine, and, without any doubt, new frigates, diesel submarines, small missile ships, supply vessels
- said Korolev.

Let's say this - this is the order of 50 ships in this period
- said the commander in chief, adding that this is "the main task that the main command of the Navy today sets for itself."

According to him, all the ships will be provided in accordance with the plans of the shipbuilding program, since they are being built "for specific fleets that will solve tasks both in themselves and in other theaters."

Among the main tasks for the period up to 2020, Korolev called the balance of the number of ships under construction and the infrastructure, which will provide them with everything they need at permanent locations.

In addition, we are still building support vessels - they will also be enough, as well as, strictly speaking, warships
- He stressed, reports TASS.
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    31 March 2018 14: 56
    The death of the AUG NATO will be called!
    1. +8
      31 March 2018 14: 59
      Quote: MIKHAN
      The death of the AUG NATO will be called!

      Yeah, especially the "support vessels." Yes
      1. +6
        31 March 2018 15: 03
        Our tugs are all wassat For each of 4 calibers, and a pair of guns 100 mm caliber! lol And build hundreds of them at least 4! !
        1. +3
          April 1 2018 00: 29
          Quote: Herkulesich
          Our tugs are all

          Well, not without it, of course!
          But it intrigued me more:
          we’ll receive and introduce nuclear submarine missile cruisers in this period with ballistic missiles for intercepting a submarine,
          Is it like P-91 or what? Or something new ...
      2. +7
        31 March 2018 16: 15
        Horror, just horror ... All shipbuilding programs for the Russian fleet, over the past 10 years, have failed ...
        1. +5
          31 March 2018 16: 33
          Quote: Greg Miller
          All shipbuilding programs for the Russian fleet, over the past 10 years, have failed ...

          The coast of Belarus is defenseless !!! How to repulse a suitable US fleet ?!
      3. +5
        31 March 2018 17: 20
        Without supply vessels, the fleet is just metal with a kamikaze crew.
    2. 0
      31 March 2018 15: 05
      We urgently need a naval base off the coast of the United States, just for what it would be.
      1. +8
        31 March 2018 15: 16
        Quote: ancestors from the Don
        We urgently need a naval base off the coast of the United States, just for what it would be.

        Waste, because look, the Americans are flying around our borders to open our defense in the Ukrainian direction and the Baltic, and what can we see while barring off California and Florida? We will look for a hole in their defense to create a bridgehead, with what forces? It’s easier to establish a sea blockade The curtain in the Atlantic can be arranged, although there’s no strength for it. The base near the states will not give us anything, we have every side counting to fulfill the tasks of defending Russia, and not only naval, but also aviation with incomplete regiments closes directions. Therefore, all dreams of Cuba or Venezuela will be discarded or left to the Chinese.
        1. -1
          April 1 2018 16: 24
          The base of the Kyrgyz Republic with nuclear weapons (Cuba, Venezuela) or where, closer to the US borders will give the Pentagon a constant headache and a feeling of sitting “on the fly”. The Caribbean crisis showed how they are afraid of such a feeling ... Today, without interference, they are bringing bases closer to the Russian Federation ...
      2. +18
        31 March 2018 15: 18
        We listen to a song about 50 ships every day for the past five years. But due to the circumstances, all sorts of sanctions and breaks with suppliers there, God forbid, see these ships by the 25th year. It remains to hope for every little thing.
    3. +1
      31 March 2018 15: 23
      We will observe how this will happen, the program program and the specifics of the specifics.
    4. +2
      31 March 2018 16: 04
      A dubious statement, especially when you consider that some states have 12 aircraft carriers!
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +13
      31 March 2018 16: 26
      Yeah, here it is the death of AUG NATO and the pride of the Russian fleets ... Communication boat of the project 1388NZ “Baklan” is more reminiscent of a luxury yacht. Another curious circumstance. You may be surprised, but the representative class of communication boats in the Baltic, even without their fellow, which are hastily building in the Volga township Sokolskoye, is already three. Two - in Kronstadt, one - in Baltiysk. This is more than shock warships, which are now in the ranks of the BF.
      1. +13
        31 March 2018 17: 20
        This boat is designed for VIPs who cannot tolerate pitching. The previous ones were almost two times less in terms of displacement and, therefore, less navigable. And try to sip cognac when pitching.
        1. +1
          31 March 2018 18: 13
          Quote: Borik
          And try to sip cognac when pitching

          From the throat - easily, even in a headstand. It would be WHAT, but AS is not a problem.good
          1. +2
            31 March 2018 19: 38
            Ours may stand on their heads to drink, perhaps some admiral will master this trick. But I doubt something about the abilities of foreign guests. And those are sometimes so away.
        2. +3
          31 March 2018 23: 26
          Quote: Borik
          And try to sip cognac when pitching.

          Great to go! It’s more likely for the “guests” who, upon seeing the waves, turn green and try to send greetings quickly from the bottom of their hearts overboard. " lol
      2. 0
        31 March 2018 17: 21
        boat is not a frigate at a cost
        1. 0
          April 1 2018 08: 23
          Is it really more expensive?
      3. +3
        31 March 2018 19: 12
        Quote: Greg Miller
        communication boats

        Yes ... On such boats it is probably very convenient to enter into various communications.
      4. +3
        31 March 2018 23: 21
        Quote: Greg Miller
        This is more than shock warships, which are now in the ranks of the BF.

        Dad Muller under the Belarusian flag !? It is something!
        Stop trolling. In the Baltic, only in Baltiysk, there are 5 warships: 3 corvettes and 2 Ave. 11540, not counting RTOs and RK. Yes
    7. +6
      31 March 2018 17: 56
      Meanwhile, the PLA Navy conducted exercises in the South China Sea. The total number of participating ships amounted to 40 units. We in all fleets with full combat readiness do not have enough. Is it somehow dumb at such a pace? As I understand it, by 2020 there will be 400 of them?
      1. +1
        31 March 2018 18: 05
        Quote: Mar. Tira
        How does it get dumb at such a pace? As I understand it, by the 2020 year they will have their 400 pieces?

        With all due respect to the PLA, the qualitative component is more important than the quantitative. In addition to the coherence of the crews of the ships, at least a well-coordinated skill of interaction as part of the squadron, AUG, etc., is required. Equally important is the presence of traditions and experience, even historical.
        1. +2
          April 1 2018 05: 03
          I agree! But the fact is that China is making up for this at a frantic pace. And you can be sure that they will do it. To do this, they conduct exercises and titanic rearmament of the army and navy. In addition, look at their ships, They are all modern, and with modern, and most importantly, constantly upgraded weapons.
      2. +1
        31 March 2018 19: 25
        There was no privatization ....
  2. +11
    31 March 2018 15: 01
    And the helicopter carriers, and the destroyers, and how many nuclear-powered cruisers of the Orlan project will be in operation at all? Fleet development program failed, let's talk straight! Due to the lack of engines we take Chinese bullshit. To promise does not mean to fulfill! So I'm skeptical about this statement! We would actually actually finish building a spaceship with a thermonuclear engine on board, rather than complete the fleet re-equipment program on time.
    1. +6
      31 March 2018 15: 16
      Fleet development program failed, let's talk straight! Not failed, but now fashionably corrected! But in general, yes, on surface combat ships recourse
  3. +17
    31 March 2018 15: 05
    We look and compare!
  4. 0
    31 March 2018 15: 15
    Cuba must undergo a deep modernization of its armed forces!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +1
    31 March 2018 15: 17
    what has been said can be safely divided into 2 ..... laughing Recently, here, too, one declared ........ KAZAN, Feb 23 - RIA Novosti. The Russian Navy will replenish with a small rocket ship "Vyshny Volochek", built at the Zelenodolsk plant named after A.M. Gorky in Tatarstan, in March, said on Friday the head of the department of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to ensure state defense orders Pavel Pechkovsky

    RIA Novosti https://ria.ru/defense_safety/20180223/1515191586
    .html
    1. 0
      31 March 2018 17: 10
      Sharing on 2 is inconvenient.
      It is necessary to completely change the power - and nothing will have to be divided, 0 is not divided.
      1. 0
        April 1 2018 09: 41
        Quote: Mestny
        Sharing on 2 is inconvenient.
        It is necessary to completely change the power - and nothing will have to be divided, 0 is not divided.

        Put everyone from the composition of those commenting on HE at the head of state and live beautifully. Dear Mestny, I hope you already have lists? Are you there as whom?
  7. +1
    31 March 2018 15: 17
    Quote: MIKHAN
    The death of the AUG NATO will be called!

    Death is not death, but FIGs will come nearer to our shores without consequences for themselves!
  8. +8
    31 March 2018 15: 20
    and nuclear submarine missile cruisers with ballistic missiles for intercepting a submarine,
    Cool .. laughed heartily .. lol But in fact - the implementation of this program in the originally declared volume raises great doubts. I hope the multi-star military in this case knows better.
    1. 0
      31 March 2018 16: 38
      Why ... maybe they want to intercept enemy submarines at the bases, intercepting the enemy with ballistic strikes on their navies, we will not dismiss this option either, given the difficult situation in the world, our admiral generals also have to take a deep breath, you know and beat with a blizzard (to answer something), but what are the pure intentions of the strategists at the time of the confrontation, God forbid we do not know, because I’m ready to lie in the company infantry chain, fighting off the enemy’s onslaught with fire, but not a single army is ready to attack the naval base and large cities, maybe this will save us from the great war?
      1. +6
        31 March 2018 17: 19
        Well, I think that Korolev did make a reservation or got messed up in the sentence. This happens, especially since he is not a speaker, but a military man. Although if I spoke on the draft, then questions to the speechwriter. Yes and it doesn’t matter - everyone understood his thought ...
        1. 0
          31 March 2018 20: 45
          In short, KVU-NSVD, you are an adequate fighter, you will cover me with Vitek and I will come up, I’ll overcome the mountain block and the claws of my attack will cover me. They’re just around the corner, got out of the bag and snooping around the camp, in a word, I'm sorry for the familiarity and the transition to you, I don’t watch anything except military newsreels and memoirs of soldiers, sergeants, generals. I read Krasnaya’s documentary evidence every night Armies .... We went forward, they were crushed, There is so much typed, but does the younger generation know (my baby goes to the gymnasium German), what kind of place is Szekesfehervar ...?
          1. 0
            31 March 2018 20: 53
            don’t take what I said here and I’m sorry for everything that I’ve carried, it’s just accumulating, but I’ll share something, sorry
            1. 0
              April 1 2018 09: 43
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              don’t take what I said here and I’m sorry for everything that I’ve carried, it’s just accumulating, but I’ll share something, sorry

              Share with your wife, so she will be pleased and others understand.
  9. +4
    31 March 2018 16: 21
    "The shipbuilding program 2018-2020 will be fully implemented - this is not even subject to any doubt" - ridiculed so ridiculed)))
  10. +5
    31 March 2018 16: 25
    The head patrol corvette of project 22160 "Vasily Bykov" moored in Novorossiysk. It is supposedly intended to fight smugglers and piracy, however, it is armed with the Caliber RK and RCC Onyx, in the future Zircon. For pirates, excessive armament, but it can upset something. The second of six is ​​on the way.
    1. +8
      31 March 2018 17: 41
      It is armed with one 176M cannon in a new cap and two MTPU turrets. Gibka will be brought up later. Plus a helicopter.

      There is a feed CONVERTIBLE AREAand what will happen - a refugee camp, a banquet hall, passing cargo to Tartus or somewhere else, a target container (for example, a prison unit or a medical unit for a specific purpose, or a complex with deep-sea devices / a base unit for diving operations with a pressure chamber and compressors) or yours Gauges in a container is a big question.
  11. exo
    +7
    31 March 2018 16: 44
    Blessed is he who believes!
    1. -1
      31 March 2018 17: 11
      And who does not believe? Are those in hell burning?
      1. exo
        +3
        31 March 2018 19: 12
        And who does not believe in sorrow. Because there will not be any 50 ships close. Again they will set up boats and small grass Buyans and Karakurt, against the background of the construction by China and the USA of normal large-capacity ships. And the patriots, will tell the fable about the "land of the Russian Federation and the unnecessary fleet"
  12. +9
    31 March 2018 17: 12
    I agree that there will be 50 units if 40 of them are motor boats. As our OSK ships build on 10-12 years, we’ll build in the next century. And we need ships yesterday.
    1. +1
      31 March 2018 17: 24
      If they can regularly launch icebreakers the size of an aircraft carrier, then production capabilities
      1. +1
        31 March 2018 17: 29
        Are you seriously?
      2. 0
        31 March 2018 17: 31
        On the same site was a series of articles about ChSZ. I recommend reading it.
        1. +1
          31 March 2018 18: 56
          sabotage (Dmitry) Today, 17:31 ↑ New
          On the same site was a series of articles about ChSZ. I recommend reading it.

          So this is Ukraine, Nikolaev, served there in 181 BSRK. ChSZ is already gone ... out of 40 workers, 000 remain, 2000 of the Commune generally lay down, "Ocean" is barely breathing ...
      3. +1
        31 March 2018 17: 49
        Em. Only if you take the world's smallest aircraft carrier Chakri Narubet:
        12 000 tons of displacement
        182 meter length

        That Muromets (the last icebreaker handed over, only in January came to the Northern Fleet).
        6500 tons of displacement
        85 meters of length

        If you take the Arctic, then he left for + 3 years. This time. And then it’s logical to compare it with the smallest nuclear aircraft carrier in the world, Charles De Gaulle:
        43 000 displacement (and after repair and modernization will be 45 +).
        260 meters

        Arctic:
        33 500 displacement
        175 meters
    2. +2
      31 March 2018 17: 58
      "Sailor
      Today, 17: 12
      I agree that there will be 50 units if 40 of them are motor boats. As our OSK ships builds for 10-12 years, so in the next century and build. And the ships are needed yesterday. "
      As a sailor of the Black Sea Fleet, explain to me exactly what kind of ships were needed yesterday, what will the ships do not replace them with today and tomorrow, and most importantly, apparently you are talking about large vessels, where are you going to go to them? And the purpose of these trips.
      1. +3
        31 March 2018 18: 35
        Which ships are needed, I’ll answer you NEW and different classes (aircraft carriers do not count), frigates, MRK corvettes and minesweepers in the first place, and at least on EM once every 4 years, I generally keep quiet about nuclear submarines and submarines, and it’s yours today and tomorrow the day after tomorrow and the other day. And all the ships I listed are ships for the protection of territorial waters and zonal air defense. Ships of the 1st and 2nd rank which are available are old and not all of them can carry out combat missions of the present.
        1. +3
          31 March 2018 20: 10
          If you did not notice, then I drew attention to the fact that now a tendency has gone towards a decrease in (maximum) dimensions. With extremely powerful weapons of the same dimensions.
          Now the torpedo boat is armed like EM once. Moreover, EM could not even dream of such weapons. The question arises: why build a huge 3000t bandura in displacement if the 800t steamer fulfills a task and even exceeds it?
      2. +6
        31 March 2018 18: 39
        Quote: Petrol cutter
        As a sailor of the Black Sea Fleet, explain to me exactly what ships were needed yesterday, what ships will not replace them from today and tomorrow

        First of all, by quantity. There is a landslide reduction in the number of fleets - old ships continue to age, their capabilities do not correspond to today's challenges from the word "no way", but there are no new ones
        Quote: Petrol cutter
        and most importantly, apparently, because you are talking about large vessels, where are you going to go to them? And the purpose of these trips.

        The main goal of our Navy is the security of the SSBN, the strategic nuclear forces component on which "sits" on the order of 40% of our strategic nuclear shield.
        Well, at the Pacific Fleet today this same safety is provided by the 1 (ONE) Submarine of the Schuka-B type, despite the fact that the fleet (not only the Pacific Fleet, but in general) does not have a single minesweeper capable of fighting the modern mine threat.
        So clearer?
        1. +4
          31 March 2018 19: 45
          I will answer both. MRK we will give you. They are universal launch platforms. It’s not for us to decide what to run for whom. The main word-22800 on the Black Sea Fleet is the PLATFORM to launch! This is not a cruiser, not an EM. Well, when do you guys understand the doctrine? We will not chase the states by the number of EMs, Cruisers and other Dreadnought. Empty is the thing.
          And submarines in the right quantity at the Black Sea Fleet will be built by my colleagues specializing in this matter. God help them.
        2. +1
          31 March 2018 20: 16
          No, it’s not clear. I personally led the Black Sea Fleet. The situation at the Pacific Fleet is not known to me.
          1. +1
            31 March 2018 21: 00
            Speaking of birds! The installers began to mount the shaft lines on the Storm.
            1. 0
              31 March 2018 21: 58
              Quote: Petrol cutter
              Speaking of birds! The installers began to mount the shaft lines on the Storm.

              What is the Storm?
              1. +1
                April 1 2018 19: 50
                If you need to explain, then you need to explain.
              2. +1
                April 1 2018 20: 23
                "Storm" is MRC pr.22800 which we are building at the More factory. In the amount of three units.
                Each one has eight p at the Club K. system. He, Caliber, aka Kolya. '' Nikolay, I call him important!
          2. 0
            April 1 2018 09: 55
            Firstly, it means that you did not carefully read the article, there is not a word about the Black Sea Fleet, and secondly, your question about Pacific Fleet, then there is the most deplorable state there. And your stories about 800t ships that are armed like destroyers, this is nonsense, EM BKR RKR, are armed with complex weapons, this is both air defense PLO and work along the coast, where you put the same Polement redoubt in 800t, I am silent about GAS.
            1. +2
              April 1 2018 20: 00
              Oopsie, I answered you, but did not answer the article. I do not know the situation on the Pacific Fleet! You pretentiously called yourself a sailor of the Black Sea Fleet! So answer me, a real shipbuilder working at the Black Sea Fleet.
              1. 0
                April 1 2018 20: 58
                And what is pathos? I served in the Black Sea Fleet during the Soviet era and I am proud of it, and I didn’t ask you questions, but expressed my opinion regarding the article. Quickly, you “changed shoes”.
            2. +1
              April 7 2018 20: 31
              I don’t know where to put it. They did not discuss this with me. Moreover, the level of secrecy has been raised since April XNUMX. So now we go with a bunch of passes. Now even with the Black Sea Fleet sailors it was very dumb to discuss the performance characteristics of our troughs. And then you’ll sit down for an hour ...
              1. 0
                April 8 2018 16: 37
                Strictness lies in your recent understanding of the general problem, judging by the level of your intellect TTX of your ships and a secret for you.
    3. +1
      April 1 2018 09: 47
      Quote: Sailor
      I agree that there will be 50 units if 40 of them are motor boats. As our OSK ships build on 10-12 years, we’ll build in the next century. And we need ships yesterday.

      Well, of course, you need to stop building everything and put all the money into building the fleet. We do not need roads, ports, airports, bridges and, of course, moorings. Blind aircraft carriers and where will they moor? Near your summer house? Or have you already built a pier for them?
      1. +1
        April 1 2018 12: 29
        And what roads are being built somewhere? We just don’t have them in Volgograd, and recently I was driving along the M-4 toll road in Rostov, so there’s rubbish too. But there are berths under the ships of the classes I have indicated, because the seats were freed up due to the loss of decommissioned ships . It is necessary to steal less and prices to be lifted up, if Joseph Vissarionovich was at the helm now, we would have completed all aircraft upgrade programs on time, or even ahead of schedule, with the same amount of funds. A star in the Far East has been building a corvette for 10 years, is that what?
  13. 0
    31 March 2018 17: 26
    As I understand it, shipyards are exempted from Indian and other orders, and now they will be allowed to work on our fleet?
    1. +6
      31 March 2018 17: 56
      Shipyards have long been free of Indian orders.

      The last Indian INS Trikand surrendered back in 2013.
      Admiralteika completes a couple of 636 for Algeria.
      SV is working on gatekeepers / RTOs for Algeria - the main repairs at the facilities are over.


      Actually everything. In two built 11356 buildings at Yantar, the Indians are still trading - there is no active movement on orders, so the loot did not go.
  14. +1
    31 March 2018 17: 43
    I would like to believe ...
  15. +4
    31 March 2018 18: 59
    RZHU NIMAGU ... !!!!! About 50 ships and vessels will enter the combat structure of the Russian Navy until 2020. This was announced by the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Vladimir Korolev, speaking on Saturday at the ceremony of installing the last board of the outer skin on the hull of the exact replica of the sailing battleship of the Baltic Fleet "Poltava". I believe that the number of admirals should be halved !!! Their number does not correspond to the size fleet! am
  16. +1
    31 March 2018 20: 15
    We will see. The Navy Commander before 2020 should be at the post, so there is a demand from him!
  17. 0
    April 1 2018 09: 14
    Yeah, again, just empty promises.
    1. +1
      April 1 2018 09: 51
      Quote: kefan
      Yeah, again, just empty promises.

      I agree with you. Here, under the Communists, everything was like garlic: they promised communism in the 1980 year and it arrived. Communism for people from party families. Do you also already live in communism? Probably as children of our general secretaries, in the USA and the EU?