China effortlessly launched dozens of Iskander analogues

33
The People’s Liberation Army of China just recently conducted exercises in the massive use of its own development of tactical complexes. The maneuvers, which involved both electronic and actual missile launches, included the DF-15B, DF-11AZT complexes, as well as the latest development of the DF-16.

DF-15B is a classic OTRK, developed in the late 80-s of the last century. It carries a solid single-stage rocket with a maximum range of 600 km. The mass of the warhead is 500 kg (up to 350 CT in the case of a nuclear warhead). Circular probable deviation - up to 600 meters.



DF-11AZT is a kind of analogue of the Russian Iskander-M. In this complex, the accuracy of the hit was improved, as well as the time of its combat deployment, which is 5 minutes.

DF-16 is a heavy tactical complex with a two-stage rocket. The range of its flight may exceed 1000 km. It is assumed that the rocket QUO is just 5 meters.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    33 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      28 March 2018 16: 23
      Apples and uncle in Kiev.
      At the parade, yes, there were a dozen tactics. And what the hell with three containers?
      "Dozens of launches" did not see.
      1. +18
        28 March 2018 18: 16
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Apples and uncle in Kiev.

        And most of all I liked this: "China playfully launched dozens of Iskander analogues. " request That is, did not puff, did not fart, did not groan, like the others ???
        1. 0
          28 March 2018 21: 04
          That is, for China to launch a couple of dozen tactical missiles at the exercises - just to spit
        2. +4
          April 2 2018 01: 03
          Effortlessly - it meant on computers they started.
    2. +8
      28 March 2018 17: 20
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Apples and uncle in Kiev.
      At the parade, yes, there were a dozen tactics. And what the hell with three containers?
      "Dozens of launches" did not see.

      There it was written on them: DF-10. The Chinese, apparently writing their name on their OTRK immediately in capital letters, so that the enemy knew and did not fool his head with all kinds of crap, such as intelligence, etc. laughing
      1. +1
        29 March 2018 05: 26
        Thank you, I did not notice. This is a KR with a range of 1500 km and a warhead of 500 km, an analogue of the "ax."
    3. +3
      29 March 2018 09: 03
      That's how the news is drained from the finger))) Someone will answer what is the difficulty of launching 10 a couple of dozen operational tactical missiles? laughing
      1. +5
        29 March 2018 11: 33
        The hardest thing is to press the start button at the same time laughing
        1. 0
          29 March 2018 14: 02
          Quote: duche
          The hardest thing is to press the start button at the same time laughing


          Mass is fun for the Chinese
    4. +11
      29 March 2018 14: 08
      And in what sense is it an analogue of Iskander?
      So far it has analogs, like not? So you can say that AvtoVAZ, effortlessly released thousands of analogues of Mercedes.
      1. +5
        29 March 2018 14: 21
        There are currently no analogues to Iskander! A certain analogue is not an analogue ... Let the author correctly express it in Russian, otherwise many questions arise ...
    5. +1
      29 March 2018 14: 41
      rather on fau
    6. +4
      29 March 2018 17: 22
      Did not impress.
    7. 0
      29 March 2018 18: 35
      Quote: IGAR
      That is, for China to launch a couple of dozen tactical missiles at the exercises - just to spit
      1. +3
        29 March 2018 18: 40
        Thus, a sense of the greatness of the nation and plans to expand the territory, ending in the failure and loss of the following "Taiwan"
    8. 0
      29 March 2018 22: 10
      Does DF16 not fall under the INF Treaty, or has China not signed it?
      1. +2
        April 1 2018 21: 55
        The bilateral treaty somehow did not provide for the presence of China. laughing
    9. +6
      29 March 2018 22: 31
      Cool, an analog of Iskander with a KVO 600 ... Still probably with an unpredictable flight path. That is, whom God will send ...
    10. +2
      30 March 2018 10: 06
      Outwardly, there may be a twin brother. only one brother is just a soldier, and the other is a special forces soldier, and they are sooo alike.
    11. +2
      30 March 2018 16: 13
      Why are we merging our technology with China? Why do we sell our latest weapons, the same su-35s. Well, I understand if the quick-eyed would buy hundreds of planes from us. But a dozen or two?
      Though kill, I don’t understand why we dig a hole for ourselves. Sooner or later this will come to us
      1. 0
        30 March 2018 16: 28
        Our eyes rolled back on the rollbacks, or the order to be friends in the "lite" version
      2. +4
        31 March 2018 15: 17
        When copying someone else’s equipment, you can never catch up with whom you copy, because while you copy, he will already have done something completely new ... Therefore, the Chinese get the “fifth generation fighter” J-5 with engines from Su- 20 or "analogue of Iskander" with KVO 27m. =))
        1. +1
          April 4 2018 01: 23
          Quote: Dmitry Hippy
          "5th generation fighter" J-20 with engines from the Su-27

          Ours is also with the same engines.
          Quote: Dmitry Hippy
          or "analogue of Iskander" with KVO 600m. =))

          This "analogue of Iskander" was created ten years earlier than the Iskander itself. Past. No.

          Quote: Dmitry Hippy
          When copying someone else’s technique, you can never catch up with the one you copy,

          Controversial statement. Japanese and Korean industry did not begin with scientific research of the corresponding academies of sciences. It just had access to the advanced technology and knowledge that China now has. It is ridiculous, for our part, not to be sure, but to simply say that China will not overtake us. Overtook. We would not be left behind.
    12. 0
      31 March 2018 15: 23
      Kaput Russia! Everyone will take to the Urals
      1. +1
        31 March 2018 18: 30
        Let them take it from me, I'm closer than the Urals!
    13. +2
      April 1 2018 01: 40
      Copy it does not develop. It's like writing off homework at school.
      Those who did this remained ignorant. So let them copy.
      She sometimes does not even know what they are copying ....
    14. +2
      April 1 2018 01: 45
      I can say even more. I myself work in the industry where they develop software.
      Those complex algorithms that were developed to understand an outsider is very, very difficult.
      It’s impossible to comprehend many things without commentary and additional information.
      So how can something be developed without descriptions? The so-called "Reverse Engineering" is very unproductive and usually leads to unsatisfactory results.
      1. 0
        April 1 2018 22: 03
        The Chinese have realized the impasse of this path and are trying to create something of their own, despite the fact that they initially do not have much. It is surprising that not everyone understands and continues to "write off the homework" from the liberals.
    15. +1
      April 1 2018 07: 17
      The same thing is exactly standing near the Votkinsk Rocket Plant.
    16. 0
      April 1 2018 21: 58
      And I also saw a video of the Chinese launching shells from a piece of slate.
    17. +1
      April 1 2018 23: 08
      At 00:37 P-17 (scud) analogues however. laughing
    18. +3
      April 2 2018 01: 12
      When you get tired of any nonsense to write.
    19. +1
      April 5 2018 00: 27
      Quote: AID.S
      Ours is also with the same engines.

      Not at all! Our with AL-41F1 engines is an improved version of the engine from Su-35, generation 4 ++;
      but on the Chinese J-20 are AL-31FN - created by Russia specifically for the Chinese J-10 (Su-27) based on the AL-31F from the Su-27 ... In short, not only that from the 4th generation, yes not yet their development.

      Quote: AID.S
      This "analogue of Iskander" was created ten years earlier than the Iskander itself. Past. No.

      Well, this is to the author of the article - I did not call this thing "an analogue of Iskander" - therefore I wrote in quotation marks;)

      Quote: AID.S
      Controversial statement. Japanese and Korean industry did not begin with scientific research of the corresponding academies of sciences.

      Have begun! And they reached the world level only when they started to do their own thing.
      Quote: AID.S
      It is ridiculous, on our part, not to be sure, but to simply say that China will not overtake us. Overtook. We would not be left behind.

      We are building nuclear power plants for China, and not vice versa; engines - we supply; SAM, ATGMs and other “smart” weapons, - again, we are ... Here we are NOT selling strategic bombers to them, therefore they still have Tu-16s in service.
      Even the Chinese aircraft carriers - copies of our (very imperfect) Kuznetsov - they completed one, buying unfinished from Ukraine, the other was copied from the first =)
      The Chinese space station was recently ... an analogue of Salyut-7 =)))
      So where did they overtake us? In jeans and coffee makers?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"