British Defense Ministry: We need to somehow hold back Russia
51
The British Ministry of Defense said that the collective West (which, in fact, NATO) must “responsibly move on to a review of the deterrence strategy. This confirms at least the fact that the West has such a strategy and it is clearly directed against Russia, although several years ago in the very same NATO they tried to dispute this fact.
The executive secretary of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense, Stephen Lovegrove, together with the deputy chief of staff of the British Armed Forces Defense Gordon Messenger said that the current concept of deterrence "does not meet the realities of modern times." It is reported by the news agency TASS.
From the statement of the representatives of the British MO:
In an era when there is a stable "gray zone" of the state, we must be ready to react and act. This does not necessarily mean that you need to respond with the same vector that you were attacked. It is necessary to be able to produce both escalation and de-escalation. You need to be able to use modern technology. And we should be aware that there are legal and political issues related to the state, which does not reach the war. We are used to the distinction between war and peace. We may need to consider this premise to ensure that we do not enter into a boxing match when we have one arm tied behind our backs.
Tied behind his back or keeps the fig in his pocket? ..
All these statements were made by the British representatives in connection with the incident in Salisbury. Continuing the unsubstantiated attacks against Russia, the British actually report that they are entering a "new" phase of relations with the Russian Federation, which on their part will be built solely on provocations in the style of "neither peace nor war."
In fact, nothing new. The policy of provocation at all times was the main vector for the British crown. And Russia managed to get used to it.
www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)
“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"
Information