Russia turned out to be the main buyer of Ukrainian weapons

42
The main buyer of Ukrainian weapons During the period from 2013 to 2017, Russia became, reports Look with reference to the report of the Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Russia turned out to be the main buyer of Ukrainian weapons




According to the institute, the Russian Federation acquired 23% of the weapons delivered to the market by Kiev.

The second place was taken by China. It accounted for 20 percent. The third line with 12% was Thailand.

Ukraine itself ranked 11 among the arms suppliers, providing 1,7% of the world arms market.

According to the report, "the supply of weapons from Ukraine for the period from 2013 to 2017 years, compared with the previous five-year period decreased by 26%."

At the same time, SIPRI specifies that “for the period from 2012 to 2016 years, Ukraine occupied a place among the countries-exporters of weapons 9, and for the period 2008-2012 years - 4 place”.

Recall that on Monday in Kiev announced the implementation of the supply contract tanks Oplot to Thailand (contracted 2011).
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 March 2018 10: 02
    Another Sumerian Zradoperemoga
    1. +8
      27 March 2018 10: 07
      Some kind of nonsense .. Well, yes, the Stockholm Institute ...
      Quote: Thrall
      Another Sumerian Zradoperemoga
      1. +6
        27 March 2018 10: 17
        Quote: 210ox
        Some kind of nonsense .. Well, yes, the Stockholm Institute ...

        Dim, and if we assume that British scientists work at this institute? wink
        1. +16
          27 March 2018 10: 26
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          Dim, and if we assume that British scientists work at this institute?

          well, even if they don’t work, they taught you exactly laughing
    2. +11
      27 March 2018 10: 15
      According to the institute, the Russian Federation acquired 23% of the weapons delivered to the market by Kiev.

      Interestingly what this is what we got this on 23% of weapons?
      1. +11
        27 March 2018 10: 28
        Quote: vlad66
        I wonder what we got this on 23% of weapons?

        Most likely they counted there and the aircraft engines and components for them stuffed in there and something else of "dual purpose".
        1. +5
          27 March 2018 11: 05
          Exactly, exactly. Engines, gearboxes and other machinery that was made in cooperation. Everything is very expensive, albeit piece-wise. We can’t do everything about everything ourselves yet. Give time, do it. We get a lot of bad things from those cooperators! And they themselves are cutting this business in the bud!
  2. +5
    27 March 2018 10: 04
    Well, I think so, we didn’t buy weapons, but some components from the previous Soviet cooperation.
    1. +1
      27 March 2018 10: 10
      Or, the share of exports of weapons (components) has dramatically decreased.
      Quote: Yrec
      Well, I think so, we didn’t buy weapons, but some components from the previous Soviet cooperation.
      1. +2
        27 March 2018 10: 24
        Soviet stocks in warehouses ran out, and so they decreased. Production equipment is worn out, they produce mainly or close to marriage. Who will take it?
    2. +2
      27 March 2018 10: 12
      Quote: Yrec
      Well, I think so, we didn’t buy weapons, but some components from the previous Soviet cooperation.

      Well, yes, that’s how I represent our army on suicidal weapons such as a stronghold tank and a hammer mortar. There are a bunch of simpler ways to part with life, for those who want to leave the country of eternal hunting! belay
    3. +3
      27 March 2018 10: 14
      Quote: Yrec
      not the weapons we bought, but some components

      engines - $ 168 ml.
      1. +2
        27 March 2018 10: 25
        Engines for 50-70% of our components. In Ukraine, there was their assembly and refinement.
        1. +1
          27 March 2018 10: 38
          Quote: Yrec
          Engines for 50-70% of our components.

          Why?
          Replacement yes, D-436 (found a replacement), AI-222 (found a replacement), TVZ-117 (found a replacement) GTD R95
          1. +2
            27 March 2018 10: 51
            I meant Ukrainian engines. They consisted mainly of our units. Therefore, relatively quickly, they were able to import substitute.
  3. +1
    27 March 2018 10: 06
    An interesting period of 2013-2017, would be counted from 2014 ...
  4. +7
    27 March 2018 10: 07
    stop, stop, what sale? all the more to the achressor fool
    1. +5
      27 March 2018 10: 14
      Don't you know? Tank "Armata" is a tank "Azovets", which was developed and built by the great Ukrainians. The Russians, in principle, are not capable of this. It’s just that they, through their separ agents, buy them in Ukraine, rename them “Armatu”, for conspiracy and concealment of corruption schemes and launch against powerful AFUs. T-72, just, even from a stern look, the ukra begins to burn, the Russians have to bother.
      1. +4
        27 March 2018 10: 20
        Quote: Yrec
        The Armata tank is the Azovets tank,

        1. 0
          27 March 2018 14: 31
          And I’m warming my head, how did UVZ pile up Armata so quickly? And this disguised Azovec turns out to be! Where did you look before?
      2. +1
        27 March 2018 10: 46
        blowing a snot, a stern Ukrainian shots down a plane!
    2. +5
      27 March 2018 10: 25
      Quote: iza top
      stop, stop, what sale? all the more to the achressor fool


      Yesterday we saw an intergalactic cruiser. Gouged it from an RPG. The crew is all Imperials from Tatooine. Captured.
      1. +2
        27 March 2018 10: 44
        in vain they are it, the Tatuins are vindictive, now wait for the Jedi with claims
        1. +3
          27 March 2018 11: 25
          Quote: novel xnumx
          in vain they are, tattooed vindictive


          - These are dangerous. I do not trust them. There were cases, they penetrated the brain with rays.
    3. +2
      27 March 2018 10: 51
      Eat abruptly laughing
      1. +2
        27 March 2018 11: 25
        tymchuk on gilyaku! the first nuclear-loaf discovered galetey-Seastopol
        1. +1
          27 March 2018 11: 29
          Among the great Ukrainian commanders Geleta is listed as Illovaysky wink
          1. +1
            27 March 2018 11: 38
            Speaking of Tenyukh, he requested a written order from Turchinov so that then all the dogs would not be hanged on him, as a result he was removed for indecision.
  5. +1
    27 March 2018 10: 17
    What a funky universal human hutspa
    1. +1
      27 March 2018 10: 27
      Quote: Dormidont
      What a funky universal human hutspa

  6. +1
    27 March 2018 10: 18
    Quote: Yrec
    Don't you know? Tank "Armata" is a tank "Azovets", which was developed and built by the great Ukrainians. The Russians, in principle, are not capable of this. It’s just that they, through their separ agents, buy them in Ukraine, rename them “Armatu”, for conspiracy and concealment of corruption schemes and launch against powerful AFUs. T-72, just, even from a stern look, the ukra begins to burn, the Russians have to bother.


    "Sala in Ukraine!"
  7. 0
    27 March 2018 10: 32
    What is being done: the Separs bought all the weapons of Ukraine, with what to fight?
  8. 0
    27 March 2018 11: 06
    It is interesting that we could get this from Ukrainians, which we do not have. Again they lie godlessly.
  9. +3
    27 March 2018 11: 24
    If this is true, then I am sorry for my people. So many years (27) have been divorced and still have not made any conclusions. Starting from the aircraft AN. They buried theirs (IL, TU, YAK), and tried to save the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Strategic forces sat on the Ukrainian needle. Well, what other country in the world allows this? Is it stupidity or greed?
    1. +1
      27 March 2018 13: 19
      it was an attempt to raise the status of non-brothers, otherwise they were always complex about their inferiority against the background of the Russians.
      therefore, the Russians built all the way to them the most advanced, so that at least they could be proud of something.
  10. 0
    27 March 2018 11: 27
    As I understand it, we were talking about components equated to weapons and dual-use products - ship turbines, aircraft engines, navigation and location instruments, etc.
  11. +1
    27 March 2018 11: 40
    The Stockholm Institute, like the Stockholm court, got a little confused, ranking dual-use components as weapons. One of the main trade items was aircraft and helicopter engines. But the reality is that, first of all, Russian engines were used on Russian helicopters, while Ukrainian ones were used for civilian versions and export orders. We also bought ship turbines, spare parts for KRAZ and other pieces of iron, which, as a "weapon", do not go well.
  12. +3
    27 March 2018 11: 40
    But what is dill arming Russia with now? what
    1. +3
      27 March 2018 12: 39
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      But what is dill arming Russia with now? what

      with fur laughing and laughter, as you know, prolongs life Yes it turns out immortality request
  13. 0
    27 March 2018 15: 00
    "Russia has become the main buyer of Ukrainian weapons from 2013-2017," what about the sanctions on dual-use products?
  14. 0
    27 March 2018 16: 55
    and shaw then?
  15. +1
    27 March 2018 21: 50
    And what did we buy from the country 404 ??? Although the Swedes .... what to take from them ....