In Voronezh, began testing the next An-148

32
Flight tests of the next, thirteenth in a row, passenger aircraft An-148-100Е, built by Voronezh Aircraft Company (VASO) for the Russian Defense Ministry, began in Voronezh. bmpd.



The contract for the supply of 15 aircraft to the military was signed in 2013. The cost of the transaction amounted to 18,4 billion rubles.

“Soaring the 24 of March 2018, the board became the 33-m An-148 aircraft built by VASO and the 44-m aircraft of the An-148 / An-158 family as a whole (including the 11 units built in Ukraine). This aircraft was originally scheduled for delivery in the 2017 year, but then was postponed for delivery to the 2018 year, ”the material says.



This year, the VASO also intends to deliver the last two aircraft under a contract with the Ministry of Defense. After the contract is completed, the construction of An-148 in Voronezh will be frozen.

According to the resource, of the 12 machines received by the Ministry, nine are part of the 8th aviation divisions at the Chkalovsky airdrome, two in the 33rd separate transport aviation regiment of the 6th Air Force and Air Defense Army of the Western District, one in the 30th separate transport air regiment of the 4th Red Banner Army Air Force and Air Defense of the Southern District.
  • vk.com/antonov_148
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    26 March 2018 16: 05
    Good news. As things are with the D-436 engines, the engine itself is good. Still, abandoning Ukrainian components would be generally wonderful. I hope work is underway at Salute.
    1. +9
      26 March 2018 16: 09
      Quote: RASKAT
      Still to abandon the Ukrainian components would be generally wonderful.

      It’s easier to abandon the aircraft itself and put its Yaks, Ily, Tu .... on the stream.
      1. +1
        26 March 2018 16: 21
        So it’s true .. But you see how tightly and with a time shift we are launching a new plane, ship, rocket into production. There isn’t that. This is ... Of course you have to build your own. It would be from what.
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: RASKAT
        Still to abandon the Ukrainian components would be generally wonderful.

        It’s easier to abandon the aircraft itself and put its Yaks, Ily, Tu .... on the stream.
        1. +3
          26 March 2018 16: 27
          Quote: 210ox
          It would be from what.

          And it is necessary to ask Rogozin Sr.
          1. +3
            26 March 2018 16: 38
            The answer is known: everything will be done on time. The storyteller, however.
            1. +2
              26 March 2018 17: 15
              Quote: svp67
              And it is necessary to ask Rogozin Sr.

              Quote: Sergey985
              The answer is known: everything will be done on time. The storyteller, however.

              You think too primitively about deadlines and production. They forgot that most of the production remained "abroad". Even Belarus is already Excluded into the industrial chains of strategic industries.
    2. +1
      26 March 2018 16: 09
      Not. The engine is everything.

      For the short term (Be-200) - consider SaM-146. Well, how short a year XLUMX-20 can fly LL. On a long PD-21 in this dimension they will do, unless of course they provide economic loading on this segment. This is the main problem.

      There are engines for the whole order of An-148. For unfinished, and engines under the contract were purchased even earlier, before the sanctions.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      26 March 2018 16: 13
      So we have a full package of documentation for D-436. We can produce it ourselves, if I understand correctly.
      1. +2
        26 March 2018 16: 29
        Quote: Sergey985
        So we have a full package of documentation for D-436. We can produce it ourselves, if I understand correctly.

        What's the point? That it is necessary to produce such an engine, there are no questions, but Ivchenko’s KB engines ... Own, on its base it is necessary to do MODERN. Moreover, it can also be used for UAVs
  2. +2
    26 March 2018 16: 08
    In Voronezh, flight tests of the next, thirteenth, passenger An-148-100Е aircraft built by JSC Voronezh Joint-Stock Aircraft Building Company (VASO) for the Russian Ministry of Defense began,
    I’m glad that a new plane is coming to our VKS, but I’m not glad that this is An ... especially since the thirteenth
    1. +6
      26 March 2018 17: 06
      Quote: svp67
      In Voronezh, flight tests of the next, thirteenth, passenger An-148-100Е aircraft built by JSC Voronezh Joint-Stock Aircraft Building Company (VASO) for the Russian Ministry of Defense began,
      I’m glad that a new plane is coming to our VKS, but I’m not glad that this is An ... especially since the thirteenth



      Do not be bullshit.
      1. 0
        26 March 2018 17: 59
        Quote: shuravi
        Do not be bullshit.
        And you, so I see nothing smart to add and no ...
        1. +2
          26 March 2018 18: 18
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: shuravi
          Do not be bullshit.
          And you, so I see nothing smart to add and no ...



          Why add? To cheers-patriotic exclamations?
          1. +1
            26 March 2018 18: 24
            Quote: shuravi
            Why add? To cheers-patriotic exclamations?

            And where did you SEE him there? You seem to have some clouding. I can argue my position.
            1. A new car is good. Do you see "cheers-patriotism" here?
            2. But it’s bad that it’s An. Once again I repeat BAD. Since the car is NOT OUR, although it is produced at our factories, with the overwhelming number of our components, it is enough that the engines are UKRAINIAN and that they need to be replaced by permission of the Antonov Design Bureau. Do you think that they will talk with us about this? Therefore, I am against the "An" with us. A good, very useful car ... remove the "alien" put your own and release it under any other brand, but not "An". Learn from the Chinese.
            3. If you are a pilot, then on the account of the "thirteenth", I think I don’t really need to explain it ...
            1. +2
              26 March 2018 18: 31
              Quote: svp67
              3. If you are a pilot, then on the account of the "thirteenth", I think I don’t really need to explain it ...

              Superstition about the number thirteen applies only to the tail number. Otherwise, we would have 12 units each, because it is impossible to collect the 12th immediately after the 14th. They told you about this "nonsense".
            2. +2
              26 March 2018 20: 07
              Quote: svp67

              1. A new car is good. Do you see "cheers-patriotism" here?
              2. But it’s bad that it’s An. Once again I repeat BAD. Since the car is NOT OUR, although it is produced at our factories, with the overwhelming number of our components, it is enough that the engines are UKRAINIAN and that they need to be replaced by permission of the Antonov Design Bureau. Do you think that they will talk with us about this? Therefore, I am against the "An" with us. A good, very useful car ... remove the "alien" put your own and release it under any other brand, but not "An". Learn from the Chinese.


              The approach is fundamentally wrong. This is not an alien and accessories on it.
              one must face the truth. part of our territory was torn away in the 1991 year. Together with factories and design bureaus. And currently under American occupation. And to our people, American propaganda is now brainwashing, turning them into our enemies.
              But alas, in the near future no release is expected. For the president of the looting was replaced by the president, the watchman of the capital of the inner circle.

              3. If you are a pilot, then on the account of the "thirteenth", I think I don’t really need to explain it ...


              Well, in my third year I had the call sign 013.
              And this number in aviation is not so afraid:




              1. 0
                26 March 2018 22: 24
                Quote: shuravi
                Well, in my third year I had the call sign 013.
                And this number in aviation is not so afraid:

                I do not agree! Hi Volodya! In our OVE, the numbering of the sides was in order, only after the 12-th immediately 14-th. Here is the 14-th and was defeated by CIT, well, at least the crew is alive! True, the commander received damage, but after treatment returned to flight work.
                1. 0
                  27 March 2018 20: 12
                  Quote: non-primary

                  I do not agree! Hi Volodya! In our OVE, the numbering of the sides was in order, only after the 12-th immediately 14-th. Here is the 14-th and was defeated by CIT, well, at least the crew is alive! True, the commander received damage, but after treatment returned to flight work.


                  As you can see, they were not always afraid.
                  1. 0
                    27 March 2018 20: 28
                    Quote: shuravi
                    As you can see, they were not always afraid.

                    I see in this that there were no 13 boards, and crashed 14. How not to believe in superstition?
  3. 0
    26 March 2018 17: 33
    You need to be a complete idiot, so now even in uniform, get into it. Are there few of your own?
    1. +4
      26 March 2018 17: 49
      And what's the problem? A good plane, commissions and shishkoparov to carry the very thing. Just for these purposes, fewer and fewer
    2. +1
      26 March 2018 18: 28
      Quote: AnGiNa
      You need to be a complete idiot, so now even in uniform, get into it.

      Well, of course there are more options ... by train, by car, on foot .... yes, take a trampoline from Mr. Rogozin
      Quote: AnGiNa
      Are there few of your own

      Well, this "An" is 75% ours. And this is much more than in the "Russian" "Super Jet" ...
      But there are NO "friends" yet. There are still SOVIET. But they are EXTENDED
      1. +2
        26 March 2018 18: 58
        All at once. It's not about the options: by train, on foot, on skis. Aircraft Design Bureau Antonov, i.e. not ours anymore. Let now and 75%. And the remaining 25% where, where to get and most importantly when? What about the engine? Or again they forgot that this is "Antonov"? Or is it just to make the aircraft factory in Voronezh work? ..
        My first education is just profile - aviation. Although in the past, there is just an understanding of how the aircraft is created and not operated.
        1. 0
          26 March 2018 19: 04
          Quote: AnGiNa
          Aircraft Design Bureau Antonov, i.e. not ours anymore.

          I agree completely.
          Quote: AnGiNa
          And the remaining 25% where, where to get and most importantly when? What about the engine

          It is necessary to work, fruitfully and hard. Create YOUR production.
          Quote: AnGiNa
          Or again they forgot that this is "Antonov"? Or is it just to make the aircraft factory in Voronezh work? ..

          And why is it bad that, at least somehow, but the plant WORKS? And the plane itself, I think is GOOD. And you can fully consider the option, on its basis to create OUR, a Russian plane and produce it under the name "NeAn", "Antoshka" ...
          1. +1
            26 March 2018 19: 38
            That’s what’s bad: “After the contract is completed, the construction of the An-148 in Voronezh will be frozen.”
            And then, here I complained that 148 is not ours at all. And there will be many problems from this. Aircraft production is a complex industry, a lot of resources are required at the preparation stage: slipways, rigging ... It turns out that all this with such plans is not a block approach, for unification, but a “one-time” one. And so let him fly, be completely from the Russian Federation.
            1. 0
              26 March 2018 19: 41
              Quote: AnGiNa
              That’s what’s bad: “After the contract is completed, the construction of the An-148 in Voronezh will be frozen.”

              They are preparing to launch the IL-112. As soon as the "green light" is given, there will be MUCH these aircraft. Significantly more than the An-148
              1. +1
                26 March 2018 20: 18
                And again the slipways, equipment and other joys of the new product. After all, we are not discussing in a party at the club where the “movement” is the main thing.
                1. 0
                  26 March 2018 20: 20
                  Quote: AnGiNa
                  And again the slipways, equipment and other joys of the new product. After all, we are not discussing in a party at the club where the “movement” is the main thing.

                  What to do, not we are, but the world is ....
  4. +1
    26 March 2018 18: 12
    After the contract is completed, the construction of the An-148 in Voronezh will be frozen

    What will VASO do, will they assemble the IL-96th or will they start working with the IL-112?
    1. 0
      26 March 2018 19: 03
      They have orders for IL-96 until 2024
    2. 0
      26 March 2018 19: 06
      Quote: Sergey-72
      What will VASO do, will they assemble the IL-96th or will they start working with the IL-112?

      I would very much like for the “112” to finally take off and fly. By the way, I don’t understand why it is impossible to provide for the Moscow Region a purely passenger option “112”
  5. 0
    26 March 2018 19: 18
    they seem to have banned their flights. no? after the catastrophe

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"