Military Review

Nuclear "Petrel" will fly a few days

82
The effect of Vladimir Putin’s message to the Federal Assembly, which he read out on 1 in March of this year, is still visible in the media pages, including the Western ones.


The foreign press continues to discuss new types of weapons that were personally announced by the President of the Russian Federation. Experts are lining up to comment on Sarmat, Dagger, Burevestnik and others, but all are united in one thing - the response of the Western powers to this weapon not yet.

The voting on the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ended the other day, where it was proposed to choose names for new weapon systems. The ground-based laser facility is now called the Peresvet, the submarine multi-purpose strategic system is called the Poseidon, and the nuclear-powered cruise missile is now officially called the Storm Petrel.

The latter, by the way, is able to overcome tens of thousands of kilometers, and hit the target on the territory of the enemy from any direction.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Samaritan
    Samaritan 26 March 2018 16: 16
    0
    God forbid, if so you can talk about weapons ...
    The only thing left is to put it into production, but as we know, it’s a little tough for us ...
    1. Romka47
      Romka47 26 March 2018 16: 31
      +7
      Tough and not everywhere, nuclear weapons are very quickly adopted and put on stream. I don’t remember that they would announce nuclear weapons and, as a result, would not put into service, or drag out for years.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 26 March 2018 16: 41
        0
        Nuclear "Petrel" will fly a few days
        i.e ; "arbitrarily long" (C) GDP.
        1. Borik
          Borik 26 March 2018 17: 21
          +4
          The ground laser system is now called "Relight",

          And as I think the name "Sunny Bunny" would suit this weapon.
          All of them in childhood were played by a mirror and blinded each other.
          1. Zheleznostop
            Zheleznostop 26 March 2018 17: 32
            0
            We repeated the experiments of Archimedes)
          2. Romka47
            Romka47 27 March 2018 11: 57
            +3
            Maybe I was not the only one, but I submitted to the MO site a proposal to name the Bunny laser, not only because it’s sunny, but because when you get blind from welding, they say “it’s bunnies
          3. u1977020556
            u1977020556 April 4 2018 11: 49
            +1
            it doesn’t blind, it burns) burns practically) But onykilovy bunnies are now producing in the USA, they will shoot down flies and mosquitoes and, if possible, low-flying small UAVs)
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 26 March 2018 19: 11
      +3
      Quote: Samaritan
      The only thing left is to put it into production, but as we know, it’s a little tough for us ...

      The avant-garde has already gone into the series ... I think the matter for the Dagger will not be in the series. As for Poseidon, then I'm sure everything is very close to the series.
      1. Artek
        Artek April 6 2018 15: 28
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Samaritan
        The only thing left is to put it into production, but as we know, it’s a little tough for us ...

        The avant-garde has already gone into the series ... I think the matter for the Dagger will not be in the series. As for Poseidon, then I'm sure everything is very close to the series.


        and how do you know that "went"? Have you seen this?
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 6 2018 15: 31
          0
          Quote: Artek
          and how do you know that "went"? Have you seen this?

          Look carefully at Putin’s interview with Megan ... and there was already an article that Vanguard went into the series.
          1. Artek
            Artek April 6 2018 15: 37
            0
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Artek
            and how do you know that "went"? Have you seen this?

            Look carefully at Putin’s interview with Megan ... and there was already an article that Vanguard went into the series.

            I don’t believe your Putin and imagine not only me. Putin, for example, spoke about doubling the GDP, but did not keep his word.
            1. Bratkov Oleg
              Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 16: 35
              0
              Despite the collapse of industry by 2000, by 2015, Russia's GDP growth for 1991-2015 was 210 percent, in the USA 200 percent, in Germany 175.
              However, you don’t believe Putin ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 26 March 2018 17: 32
    +2
    And I at the expense of the nuclear installation to "Relight" repeat I immediately said that it is powered by a nuclear power plant.
    Observer 2014 (Sergey) March 3, 2018 09:51 | The new generation military air defense system will be developed this year
    In the course of this research, a thorough analysis of the technical capabilities of the industry for the creation of promising models of military air defense weapons, including those based on new physical principles of destruction, will be conducted.
    Apparently, a mini-nuclear reactor is not only useful for cruise missiles and torpedoes.
  3. konstantin68
    konstantin68 26 March 2018 17: 36
    +1
    I still can’t believe it. But, I think, the GDP would not cormorant, it never happened after him. Well done then!
    1. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 11: 54
      +1
      GDP could either tell the truth or not tell the truth - it had no other possibility.
  4. Dead duck
    Dead duck 26 March 2018 17: 56
    +2
    “Kuzkina Mother” should have been called or a bourgeois film about a boy and a killer winked
    1. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 11: 55
      +1
      I proposed to call the underwater vehicle "The Bastard") It's a pity it did not pass.
  5. Charik
    Charik 26 March 2018 18: 36
    0
    yes fairy tales - rejoice rejoice clap your hands
    1. Lex.
      Lex. 26 March 2018 19: 06
      +1
      And if not a fairy tale?
      1. Arakius
        Arakius 26 March 2018 20: 06
        0
        Not a fairy tale should have a material embodiment. Has anyone seen this nuclear missile live? Is there evidence of her tests (for example, increased radiation background of the area)?

        And finally, the main question: why is it needed at all? This is a nuclear weapon, and in the event of a nuclear conflict everything will end within 20-30 minutes with counter-strikes of ballistic missiles. A cruise missile that will reach the enemy for more than an hour is not needed at all, the exchange of nuclear strikes will end much earlier
        1. bk316
          bk316 26 March 2018 20: 37
          +6
          Is there evidence of her trials?

          Why do you need it? By 404 no one will even use poplar, and even tactical nuclear weapons are unlikely.
          NW was not done for the war with the Papuans.

          And the role of the Petrel in the nuclear shield is obvious, this is a response to the US missile defense, a cruise missile arriving at a minimum height with non-rocket-dangerous directions are not intercepted.
          1. Arakius
            Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 30
            +1
            It is noteworthy that the standard of living (and minimum wage) you have very little differs from the "Papuan"

            Let me remind you that the US missile defense is not able to repulse a massive nuclear attack with ballistic missiles. And fly a ballistic missile - 20-30 minutes, and a cruise, albeit hypersonic - for at least an hour, just fly, when it is all over
            1. -ш-
              -ш- 27 March 2018 00: 28
              +2
              about the standard of living for Ukrainians it is better not to stutter)))
              1. Arakius
                Arakius 27 March 2018 00: 35
                -1
                The minimum salary of the Russian Federation in 2018 - 9489 p. = 169$
                The minimum wage Ukraine in 2018 is 3723 XNUMX UAH =142$

                A shocking gap in living standards))
                1. -ш-
                  -ш- 27 March 2018 00: 38
                  +4
                  Well, the trouble is that one country has a debt bubble, and the other manages to build nuclear missiles and build bridges across the straits, in short, one builds and takes the other loans and breaks everything at home
                2. Operator
                  Operator 27 March 2018 00: 48
                  0
                  How many percent of the population in Ukraine receive a minimum and lower salary? laughing
                3. Romka47
                  Romka47 27 March 2018 12: 01
                  +2
                  Well by the way 19% is a really big gap wink
                  1. Bratkov Oleg
                    Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 16: 41
                    +1
                    The gap is not 19 percent, but three times. I’ve got it there they wrote about dollars.
                    For example, in 2105 in Ukraine there was one tablet per 100 people, and in Russia 60 tablets per 100 people, according to Google. And try to find at least one Russian prostitute in Ukraine. It is in Russia that Ukrainian mothers, sisters and daughters sell themselves, in order to somehow make ends meet.
                    1. Golovan Jack
                      Golovan Jack 4 October 2018 17: 15
                      0
                      Quote: Bratkov Oleg
                      in 2105 year

                      belay
                      1. Bratkov Oleg
                        Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 17: 17
                        0
                        On a tablet, in google, and read it. This is what the Americans themselves wrote. Scooter is not mine repeat

                        Oh, damn it ... 2015.
        2. u1977020556
          u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 06
          +1
          A lock and a cast with a seal are always hung on the door of the warehouse. The castle will stop the fool - he will not be able to crack it, and the seal will stop the smart person - he will be afraid of the consequences of opening it.
          Serve in the army to begin with, and then judge the latest military news.
        3. Artem Popov
          Artem Popov 27 October 2018 21: 25
          -2
          No, there is only evidence of several starting tests, the rocket flew several tens of kilometers.
          And it is obvious that there is no "reactor" there, for a variety of reasons, from heat supply to environmental consequences during complex tests. Yes, Peskov will then correct for Putin that, they say, the isotope source is also nuclear, so the master is not lying at all. So there is some kind of RTG there, and for propaganda purposes, they inflated it to a nuclear wunderraffe.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 26 March 2018 19: 20
      +3
      Quote: Charik
      yes fairy tales - rejoice rejoice clap your hands

      You can’t build a nuclear shield of a country in fairy tales, but it’s about it. So it can be called a bluff or a very distant person. Bluffing, especially of this magnitude, is very easy to reveal. And there is no sense in it, from the word at all. Moreover, mattresses have already assigned their names to our weapons. Apparently, too, they decided to play "fairy tales" with us, in your opinion.
      1. Arakius
        Arakius 26 March 2018 20: 09
        -1
        A nuclear-powered cruise missile is of little use as a nuclear shield
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 26 March 2018 20: 26
          +5
          Quote: Arakius
          A nuclear-powered cruise missile is of little use as a nuclear shield

          Sure? That is, the KR with a nuclear warhead, with unlimited range, which is still a big question, how to intercept, is this not a nuclear shield? And in your opinion, what is this?
          1. Arakius
            Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 27
            0
            This is ridiculous. This rocket fly at least an hour to the territory of the United States. By this time, ordinary ballistic missiles will have everything dusted there

            how to intercept

            The higher her speed - the higher she will have to fly and the easier it is to find her. Well, to destroy - so go thin-walled cruise missile is clearly no more durable than warheads of ballistic missiles
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 26 March 2018 21: 34
              +6
              Quote: Arakius
              This is ridiculous. This rocket fly at least an hour to the territory of the United States. By this time, ordinary ballistic missiles will have everything dusted there

              Is that all? What is the difference how much the Petrel will fly, as well as how much Poseidon will get? It is important to realize that the answer in ANY case will arrive without a doubt for the adversary.
              The principle of the Perimeter system? Even if everything is nuclear, the Perimeter will automatically command the launch of our entire nuclear arsenal. That is, mattresses clearly understand that the answer will somehow arrive.
              Petrel, Poseidon can be said to have replaced systems such as Pomegranate for example. That is, it can be said the second echelon of our nuclear shield.
              1. Arakius
                Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 37
                -1
                The perimeter will not give - it has never been activated in a fully autonomous mode. And after the system crashed in the 80s, in general, launch codes are entered by officers manually.

                What is the difference how long the Petrel will fly, as well as how much Poseidon will get?

                There is a difference if you aim at military targets and you need to destroy them in the very first minutes of the war, before they give an answer. And there’s no difference when it comes to the destruction of megacities, and then this is a weapon of genocide
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 26 March 2018 21: 39
                  +3
                  Quote: Arakius
                  The perimeter will not give - it has never been activated in a fully autonomous mode.

                  Where did the firewood come from, dear? Did you service the Perimeter system or did you stupidly read it on the Wiki? Can you tell me, for example, does this system work now or not?
                  1. Arakius
                    Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 41
                    0
                    Where are you from - from the media. In the end, can you be sure that it even exists?)
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 26 March 2018 21: 48
                      +3
                      Quote: Arakius
                      Where are you from - from the media. In the end, can you be sure that it even exists?)

                      That is, your words are just words. At the same time, just think about your words, FROM THE MEDIA ... Do you seriously believe that the media will write something real about the country's most secret system?
                      1. Arakius
                        Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 56
                        0
                        Just like yours)
                        I hope you served in the army? Do you know what a non-disclosure subscription is? Do you understand why people who are really versed in the topic will never comment on it here even anonymously?

                        So I, you and everyone else here are strangers who can rely only on meager information from the media in their reasoning and only
                      2. Arakius
                        Arakius 26 March 2018 21: 58
                        0
                        And my assumptions that the "Perimeter" is not autonomous are based on common sense. The autonomy of the system in fact means that the fate of the country, bypassing the Commander-in-Chief and the military hierarchy, was given into the hands of the programmers who programmed it. Can you imagine that? Me not
                    2. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 26 March 2018 22: 01
                      +3
                      Quote: Arakius
                      given into the hands of the programmers who programmed it. Can you imagine that? Me not

                      Dear, this system has served enough and there were no abnormal launches of our missiles. Which clearly speaks of its reliability. There are no fools sitting who developed this system.
                      1. Arakius
                        Arakius 26 March 2018 22: 07
                        0
                        Where did you get the information from? From the media? So from the media it is known that in emergency situations, when the system gave a false positive (presumably 2 times), the decision to start / not start was made by officers of the control post
                      2. Arakius
                        Arakius 26 March 2018 22: 09
                        0
                        There are no fools sitting who developed this system.

                        Not fools, of course. But this is not the point, but the fact that the military elite and the Commander-in-Chief personally, in principle, could not give control of nuclear weapons into the hands of programmers and the special services supervising them. This is illogical, and illegal
                2. Bratkov Oleg
                  Bratkov Oleg 4 October 2018 16: 45
                  +1
                  Quote: Arakius
                  ... And after system crashes in the 80s ...

                  Bullshit, don’t fuck, sir. There were absolutely no failures, the Arakius nonsense.
                  Or do not use the information from the garbage can, so that you are not called a bullshit in your eyes.
            2. Operator
              Operator 26 March 2018 21: 49
              +3
              This is another matter - intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine ballistic missiles and cruise missiles on strategic bombers are strictly limited by the START treaty. Consequently, the number of targets hit on enemy territory is also limited.

              But if you additionally launch the nth number of Albatros cruise missiles with 1 Mt from the territory of Russia across the United States, the number of targets hit will increase by the nth number of units. And it doesn’t matter that the Albatrosses hit their targets a few hours after take-off - it’s even profitable because they will fly to the United States when their air defense / missile defense ceases to exist after a ballistic missile strike.

              The same applies to Poseidon submarine drones with 100 Mtn on board - they will sail to US coastal megacities through 2-3 days and wash the megalopolises into the ocean.

              Although there are quite possible options - for example, to put on Poseidon in advance on the ground outside US territorial waters (12 miles) exactly opposite New York, Washington, Los Angeles and San Francisco, and then give the command at the same time as the ballistic missiles start "Poseidons" to follow at a speed of 50 nodes to the specified goals.

              For this, the Poseidons will need no more than 20 minutes (and ICBMs will fly at least 35 minutes). So the first 40-50 million Americans will die from a strike from the sea, not from the sky.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 26 March 2018 21: 58
                +3
                Quote: Operator
                But if you additionally launch the n-th number of Albatross cruise missiles from the territory of Russia through the United States

                I’m talking about this to people ... only not Albatross, but Petrel. hi
                1. Operator
                  Operator 26 March 2018 22: 01
                  +1
                  You are right.

                  True, I suggested "Arctic fox" bully
                2. Procyon lotor
                  Procyon lotor 26 March 2018 23: 19
                  0
                  Well???? What's next? Come great joy? Horseradish strategist
              2. Arakius
                Arakius 26 March 2018 22: 05
                0
                When Sakharov offered the military his own version of a thermonuclear torpedo that could wash the US East Coast into the ocean, they indignantly replied that they were soldiers, not mass murderers, and they were not interested in such weapons. That was a difficult time, the Soviet people were most afraid that world capital would win and the bourgeoisie would take power in Russia. But he won and the power in Russia was established according to the Western model, and those in power have both yachts and palaces and money. And what in these conditions makes ordinary Russians rejoice at a possible apocalypse, for which ideals are they ready to die? This is a question that in the future, I hope, will be resolved by British scientists
                1. Operator
                  Operator 26 March 2018 23: 40
                  0
                  Do not distort, “simple Russian” - our blow will be retaliatory, the choice of the apocalypse / not the apocalypse is not ours, but yours.
                  1. Arakius
                    Arakius 27 March 2018 00: 40
                    +1
                    There will be neither one nor the other. The United States will follow the beaten track and break off the horns of some without any war or loss. The USSR was broken off, and Russia will be weaker in every way, so that they will be forced to agree on any terms on favorable terms
                    1. Operator
                      Operator 27 March 2018 00: 45
                      0
                      Russia is not the USSR, with the exception of stockpiles of weapons-grade plutonium and a nuclear missile complex bully
              3. Procyon lotor
                Procyon lotor 26 March 2018 23: 16
                +1
                Well???? What's next? Come great joy? Horseradish strategist
              4. The comment was deleted.
              5. The comment was deleted.
          2. Charik
            Charik 26 March 2018 22: 17
            0
            Nex was such a C10 Pomegranate with apples for submarines and where it is, the same with this
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 26 March 2018 22: 24
              +3
              Quote: Charik
              Nex was such a C10 Pomegranate with apples for submarines and where it is, the same with this

              Until recently, she stood on PIKES-B. As far as I know, it was modernized and it is supposedly in the arsenal of the Iskander-K complexes.
              1. Charik
                Charik 26 March 2018 22: 40
                0
                yeah in dreams with a humpback everything removed
          3. Axon
            Axon April 22 2018 11: 46
            0
            don't, let them believe
      2. Charik
        Charik 26 March 2018 22: 37
        0
        Yes, I’m far away - only I’m not far from the primary goal in the center of Russia, they’re as pistoons as they were at Bor, why didn’t they ask which of the officials to pull up and not to name them as a rocket, I think more participants would be --- eh?
      3. u1977020556
        u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 08
        +1
        very sensible ... people stopped recognizing obvious things, right?
  6. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 26 March 2018 19: 27
    0
    In total, one third of the votes - 73%, from Russia
    Mathematicians, damn it. (4:50)
  7. Operator
    Operator 26 March 2018 22: 06
    0
    Arakius,
    With the "Perimeter", or rather, with its modern counterpart, everything is simple - in peacetime it is turned off, in a special period it is turned on.

    Smoke yesterday’s statement by the Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces to reduce the time needed to prepare for strikes by the Russian WTO by 1,5 times.
    1. Arakius
      Arakius 26 March 2018 22: 16
      0
      As far as I know the topic, nuclear weapons are useless without specific activation codes. They are available only to the Commander-in-Chief and his deputies, and without their participation nothing will come of it. The perimeter can automate part of the process, but people still make the final decision to strike. Nobody will trust this to the robot, because the robots are programmed by people, and the authorities are not fools to give nuclear weapons to programmers
      1. Operator
        Operator 26 March 2018 23: 56
        0
        Again: in peacetime, the codes are not at the starting calculations, in a special period - at the starting.

        The reaction time of the Russian strategic nuclear forces in a special period is determined by the flight time of the American Trident ballistic missiles launched from submarines near our territorial waters along a flat trajectory - approximately 10 minutes.

        From this time limit, 1 minute is spent on detecting missile launch using satellites and over-the-horizon radars, 1 minute is on passing the launch command, 1 minute is on entering codes and launching ballistic and cruise missiles from mines, from mobile installations, submarines and surface ships . Then 5 minutes to the active section of the trajectory of ballistic missiles. Plus, the passage of the Poseidon activation team on ultra-long radio waves from the Zeus transmitter on the Kola Peninsula is 1 minute.

        And with your USA - FSE.
        1. Arakius
          Arakius 27 March 2018 00: 29
          0
          And with your USA - FSO

          As with Russia. Moreover, if the United States has at least ghostly chances to be reborn from the ashes, then Russia has 0. There were thousands of public and private bunkers in the United States during the Cold War to shelter at least part of the population, in the USSR / Russia - only for the elite, political, military and scientific, people are kindly invited to die from the nuclear bombing and its consequences

          However, I’ll reassure you: there will be no war. If the Commander-in-Chief rescued even before non-nuclear Turkey, then what would happen if the United States shot down a Russian plane? Another round of formidable silence from the bushes?
          1. Operator
            Operator 27 March 2018 00: 41
            0
            Unlike you, I participated in GO events until the 1991 of the year - with shelters for the population we have no worse than in your USA, and the ability to disperse the population in rural areas during a special period is many times better than in the USA.

            Do not bother to reassure - there will be no war due to the fact that our retaliatory strike and survival opportunities after your preventive strike in fact are much more effective.

            Better tell the bike about the unique US experience in rebuilding the American economy after 1945 year laughing

            The crew of our Su-24 itself was to blame for flying into Turkish airspace.
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 27 March 2018 16: 30
              0
              Quote: Arakius
              As with Russia. Moreover, if the United States has at least ghostly chances to be reborn from the ashes, then Russia has them — 0. In the USA, during the Cold War, thousands of state and private bunkers were built to shelter at least part of the population, in the USSR / Russia - only for the elite, political, military and scientific, the people are kindly invited to die from the nuclear bombing and its consequences. However, I will reassure you: there will be no war. If the Commander-in-Chief rescued even before non-nuclear Turkey, then what would happen if the United States shot down a Russian plane? Another round of formidable silence from the bushes?



              Is it hard to be too smart?

              We are not threatening anyone, they are threatening us.
              In order not to be disturbed, we have rockets and torpedoes.
              It’s not your mind to decide who and how to apply them, you still won’t guess

              Those to whom these gifts are in store - everyone understood and made conclusions
              And whether or not they can crush us without war, we will see.

              Nobody has ever defeated Russia and no country has risen from ruin since Russia
              Think better that every time you get up, Russia only gets stronger
              So wait and rejoice that we, unlike the Poles and Romanians, we will regret and feed

              History is cyclical, not finite, so hello, you and your Americans
      2. u1977020556
        u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 33
        +1
        you are little informed, you know, ... in certain circumstances no codes are needed. All weapons on duty with WMD warheads are constantly forced to receive confirmation "that there is peace on earth." Otherwise, they will start without human intervention and will execute the flight program incorporated in them. Even in the case of orbital nuclear bombardment, the probability that a significant part of the WMD in the attacked territory will survive is very high. And then everything will depend on how far and long a "nuclear-powered rocket" can fly.
  8. Charik
    Charik 26 March 2018 22: 21
    0
    even if it is all this nonsense - either they are with us or we have accumulated from them - isn’t that so?
    1. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 34
      +1
      nonsense in your head, the real state of affairs is much more interesting.
  9. Charik
    Charik 26 March 2018 22: 27
    0
    I can’t please you with a salary, but I’ll delight you with a dagger, rejoice rejoice clap your hands, shake your mane and grip
    1. Charik
      Charik 26 March 2018 22: 31
      0
      C10 -garnet with apple for submarine -where it is-yes in ...... t in full -not noticed
    2. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 36
      +1
      your information is very outdated, or you are trolling
  10. Procyon lotor
    Procyon lotor 26 March 2018 23: 09
    0
    Indeed, in the West there is no such thing .... but it will not be
  11. The poor man
    The poor man 27 March 2018 08: 18
    0
    More than one spectacular unexpected can fly out of our new weapons. I think so. And his fame, as a symbol of Russian scientific thought, will not fade for centuries.
  12. Sergey Suvorov Ria
    Sergey Suvorov Ria 27 March 2018 21: 57
    0
    Quote: Arakius
    The minimum salary of the Russian Federation in 2018 - 9489 p. = 169$
    The minimum wage Ukraine in 2018 is 3723 XNUMX UAH =142$

    A shocking gap in living standards))

    sorry that climbed. but I want to correct you a little, for you do not take into account such a concept in the Russian economic model as the “Chumara," when this is taken into account, then the minimum rate can increase several times.
    1. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 43
      0
      And also in our apartment there is gas)) and they have the fallen)) for which they now have to pay tri-trip costs)) We must assume that it remains by the end of the month when there is no money) According to my information, the end of the month in Ukraine comes through 1-2 weeks after pay at best. And there will be no further improvements. Such an analysis is obtained.
  13. Fitratovich
    Fitratovich April 1 2018 14: 24
    0
    I would instead of "Sarmat" call "Sunset" for whom it is intended
  14. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara April 1 2018 22: 05
    0
    Quote: Arakius
    And with your USA - FSO

    As with Russia. Moreover, if the United States has at least ghostly chances to be reborn from the ashes, then Russia has 0. There were thousands of public and private bunkers in the United States during the Cold War to shelter at least part of the population, in the USSR / Russia - only for the elite, political, military and scientific, people are kindly invited to die from the nuclear bombing and its consequences

    However, I’ll reassure you: there will be no war. If the Commander-in-Chief rescued even before non-nuclear Turkey, then what would happen if the United States shot down a Russian plane? Another round of formidable silence from the bushes?

    The United States has no uninhabited places and everywhere there are valuable objects, so that after applying it will be everywhere. And in our entire northeast, the density is 1 person per 20 km and at what facilities except yurts :) the worst thing is that nuclear plants will be bombed in the first place ...
    1. u1977020556
      u1977020556 April 4 2018 12: 50
      0
      We do not need to be reborn and we are not going to die)) We want and will live)) Read the story in general, or talk to people. Who is alive - he lives, and who was born dead, he simply goes to work for the time being ...
  15. master2
    master2 April 10 2018 21: 32
    -1
    I read comments and am surprised like adults and fairy tales believe - have seen enough cartoons.
  16. Axon
    Axon April 22 2018 11: 43
    0
    How many amers we leaked, but they still did not understand anything. In the 90s, when the doors to such research institutes opened with my feet, I accidentally talked to the developer of microTVs. The Americans were the first to rush to them "sharing experiences."