Military Review

Attack aircraft Su-25 BBO named in honor of the hero of Russia Roman Filipov

50
On Saturday, a ceremony was held in Primorye Territory to award the name of Hero of Russia, Major Roman Filipov to the Su-25 Su-Assault Aviation Regiment of the Eastern Military District (VVO), the district press service reports.


Attack aircraft Su-25 BBO named in honor of the hero of Russia Roman Filipov


Today, at the airfield of the assault aviation regiment of the Air Force and Air Defense Army of the Eastern Military District, stationed in the Primorsky Territory, the ceremony of conferring the name of Hero of Russia Major Roman Filipov to the Su-25CM aircraft took place. In this part, the pilot served for 10 years and from there he was sent to solve special tasks in the SAR
- said the head of the information support department of the BBO press service for the Pacific the fleet captain of the second rank Nikolay Voskresensky.

A solemn formation of the regiment's personnel and a rally took place at the airport, in which the parents and widow of Filipov took part.

The father of the deceased pilot, Nikolai Filipov, thanked the aviators for the memory of his son and expressed the hope that the pilots who will fly on a personal attack aircraft will receive special motivation for exemplary performance of tasks.

Recall, Major Guard Roman Filipov was killed on February 3 while patrolling over the province of Idlib. His Su-25 attack aircraft was shot down from a portable anti-aircraft missile system. The pilot managed to eject and led the battle until the last minutes. In order not to be captured, a Russian officer blew himself up with a grenade. The pilot was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of Russia.
Photos used:
press service BBO
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 24 March 2018 10: 10
    +12
    For the boys! This is the main cry of Russia ...
    How many of them fell into obscurity for all of us, in this massacre with world demons .. Forgive us boys. And the heroes will always remember you!
    1. tanit
      tanit 24 March 2018 10: 13
      +8
      Meehan, there is another cry. "WORK, BROTHERS."
      This one is closer to me.
      1. Russia
        Russia 24 March 2018 11: 20
        +7
        Each of them died as a hero and put his whole soul into his last words. hi
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 24 March 2018 12: 31
        +3
        Quote: tanit
        Meehan, there is another cry. "WORK, BROTHERS."
        This one is closer to me.

        Then it was already ....
        And first they threw the yellow-handed to the slaughterhouse "Shoot there, not knowing where and for what .." They were simply killed. cut, sold and they shouted MOM .. Lump in the throat straight guys!
        For revenge on the guys ... Standing without clinking glasses.
    2. Anti-Corr.
      Anti-Corr. 24 March 2018 11: 22
      +6
      Soon, “Roman Filipov” will again rise to the sky.
      Great news.
      Rasteryaev has a song, I think to the point.
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 24 March 2018 12: 53
        0
        Soon, “Roman Filipov” will again rise to the sky.
        Great news.
        Rasteryaev has a song, I think to the point.

        You bastard yet .... Laugh and mock? Oh well..

        This is the situation in Russia ...
        1. Anti-Corr.
          Anti-Corr. 24 March 2018 13: 05
          0
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Are you laughing and mocking? Oh well.

          I never make fun of such topics! soldier
  2. Muvka
    Muvka 24 March 2018 10: 12
    0
    And recently, someone was worried ... :)
  3. Falcond
    Falcond 24 March 2018 10: 16
    +6
    So Roman will continue to fly and beat the enemy!
    1. tanit
      tanit 24 March 2018 10: 21
      +5
      So it will be so. Roman Filipov - so also call the new TU-160shku.
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 24 March 2018 10: 25
        +1
        160 called the names of people involved in the far.
        1. tanit
          tanit 24 March 2018 10: 27
          +1
          And submarines - by names involved in submarines? Hero of Russia is not worthy of the fact that his name would be far away?
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 24 March 2018 10: 47
            0
            No. But the Tu-160 is called the names of people involved in the development of the aircraft or long-range aviation.
            1. tanit
              tanit 24 March 2018 10: 56
              0
              I understand. But here as with submarines. He died. Eternal Memory and Eternal Glory. But did Admiral Makarov not die? Unsuccessful. Hm Admiral Kuznetsov died in what battle?
          2. iaroslav.mudryi
            iaroslav.mudryi 24 March 2018 11: 13
            +1
            Quote: tanit
            And submarines - by names involved in submarines? Hero of Russia is not worthy of the fact that his name would be far away?

            This topic has already been here in VO:
            From the history of Russia's own names of aircraft in the postwar period
            https://topwar.ru/22842-iz-istorii-sobstvennyh-na
            imenovaniy-vozdushnyh-sudov-rossii-v-poslevoennoe
            -vremya.html
      2. Chertt
        Chertt 24 March 2018 10: 26
        +2
        Quote: tanit
        Roman Filipov - so also call the new TU-160shku.

        Tu-160 m2 are going to build 50 pieces. God grant that the majority of the nameless were
        1. tanit
          tanit 24 March 2018 10: 33
          +1
          Why? Few names? Yes, it seems enough for a series and more. Anger.
          New Heroes and not posthumously. But in honor of the Roman - it could be called.
          1. iaroslav.mudryi
            iaroslav.mudryi 24 March 2018 11: 14
            +1
            Quote: tanit
            Why? Few names? Yes, it seems enough for a series and more. Anger.
            New Heroes and not posthumously. But in honor of the Roman - it could be called.

            This topic has already been here in VO:
            From the history of Russia's own names of aircraft in the postwar period
            https://topwar.ru/22842-iz-istorii-sobstvennyh-na
            imenovaniy-vozdushnyh-sudov-rossii-v-poslevoennoe
            -vremya.html
    2. NN52
      NN52 24 March 2018 12: 06
      +2
      The correct decision is his fellow soldiers, well done, I support ..
      And well done, that struck up on the topic by the authorities, it’s quite difficult to actually break through the topic of applying any inscription to the plane in military aviation ... But I think there were no dissent ...
  4. vaaaaadik
    vaaaaadik 24 March 2018 10: 46
    +1
    Eternal memory to the hero !!!
  5. tanit
    tanit 24 March 2018 10: 49
    +3
    There will be a bust at the School. There will be a monument at the School. there will be graffiti in the cities (and hell who erase). All will be. Wang. There will be a TUSHKA in his honor. (From unknown sources)
    Graffiti in the city of Penza will definitely be, my daughter promised)
  6. shuravi
    shuravi 24 March 2018 11: 04
    +2
    Damn, muzzles to entertainers of similar PR actions to beat.
    Want to perpetuate the name of the hero, so build a new street, school, airfield.
    But to give a name to an aircraft that was assembled in the distant Soviet years and which has long been time for disposal, this is just an event for show.
    1. tanit
      tanit 24 March 2018 11: 15
      +2
      Everything will be new. Take it easy.
      1. shuravi
        shuravi 24 March 2018 11: 22
        +1
        Quote: tanit
        Everything will be new. Take it easy.

        Can you tell me where to go with your advice, or will you guess it yourself?
        1. tanit
          tanit 24 March 2018 11: 27
          0
          Oh, and tell me. Volodya, well. come on, tell me. On the mat, I will not succumb. I won’t fall for anything. Come on.
          1. tanit
            tanit 24 March 2018 11: 28
            0
            shuravi. Well then stalled?
            1. tanit
              tanit 24 March 2018 11: 30
              0
              Wanted to pull me inadequately?
              1. tanit
                tanit 24 March 2018 11: 31
                0
                Ah, I’ve pulled it out to the flood.))
        2. iaroslav.mudryi
          iaroslav.mudryi 24 March 2018 11: 31
          +1
          This topic has already been here in VO:
          From the history of Russia's own names of aircraft in the postwar period
          https://topwar.ru/22842-iz-istorii-sobstvennyh-na
          imenovaniy-vozdushnyh-sudov-rossii-v-poslevoennoe
          -vremya.html
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  7. svp67
    svp67 24 March 2018 13: 19
    +1
    I hope the onboard number of this "Rook" is the same as that of the DEBE who died in Syria. And it is necessary that the plane with THIS NUMBER bears the name of the Hero CONSTANTLY, regardless of the model and type of aircraft, which in the future will be in service with this part
    1. shuravi
      shuravi 24 March 2018 13: 24
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      I hope the onboard number of this "Rook" is the same as that of the DEBE who died in Syria. And it is necessary that the plane with THIS NUMBER bears the name of the Hero CONSTANTLY, regardless of the model and type of aircraft, which in the future will be in service with this part


      The side number for each aircraft is unique, as is the factory one. As for tactical ones, they are not permanent. Periodically change.
      1. NN52
        NN52 24 March 2018 15: 06
        0
        I don’t remember exactly what it was like in Syria, I have to look ... But not 06 for sure ... Yes, it doesn’t matter ...

        And I don’t know of a single case of a change in the aircraft’s bot number in fighter and attack aircraft ... correctly, it is unique ..
        1. shuravi
          shuravi 24 March 2018 15: 24
          0
          Quote: NN52
          I don’t remember exactly what it was like in Syria, I have to look ... But not 06 for sure ... Yes, it doesn’t matter ...

          And I don’t know of a single case of a change in the aircraft’s bot number in fighter and attack aircraft ... correctly, it is unique ..



          So 06, it's tactical.
          1. NN52
            NN52 24 March 2018 15: 54
            0
            shuravi

            I will not argue.
            In my memory, not a single number was changed. Even after modernization, accident and restoration at the factory.
            And in principle, why do this?
  8. infantry76
    infantry76 24 March 2018 13: 53
    +1
    Honor, Glory and Eternal Memory to the Russian officer, our Hero! Let the enemies know - Heroes in Mother Russia have not been extinct! I have honor! soldier
  9. Opera
    Opera 24 March 2018 14: 02
    +2
    The main thing is that at that moment my father felt good at heart. Look at the photo - he touched the attack aircraft as he touched his son.
  10. Radikal
    Radikal 24 March 2018 17: 19
    0
    Attack aircraft Su-25 BBO named in honor of the hero of Russia Roman Filipov
    Conquered the plane ... sad
  11. Sergey-72
    Sergey-72 24 March 2018 18: 36
    +2
    I don’t remember exactly what it was like in Syria, I have to look ... But not 06

    "06" is only blue. In the regiment from where this board was, now number 06 will be bypassed.
    1. NN52
      NN52 24 March 2018 18: 58
      +1
      Sergey-72

      Yes you are right. found...
      1. NN52
        NN52 24 March 2018 19: 00
        +1
        And red which
        1. Sergey-72
          Sergey-72 24 March 2018 19: 11
          +2
          It is possible that he flew on it ("evil rock" or "irony of fate"). Knowledgeable people can correct.
  12. shuravi
    shuravi 24 March 2018 19: 17
    +1
    Do not confuse the concept:
    - the aircraft assigned to the crew according to combat crew
    - flew on this plane

    If in the first case, the order is fixed once a year (maybe more often) and not the fact that the next will be on this machine.
    When performing UTP, you can fly on any side of the squadron.
    1. Sergey-72
      Sergey-72 24 March 2018 19: 47
      +1
      Do not confuse the concept:

      Perhaps I confuse it, on land technology the fixed crew is recorded in the form and operates it. In the Air Force, it turns out the technical staff is preparing the car, and who is flying is not known?
      1. shuravi
        shuravi 24 March 2018 20: 00
        0
        Quote: Sergey-72
        Do not confuse the concept:

        Perhaps I confuse it, on land technology the fixed crew is recorded in the form and operates it. In the Air Force, it turns out the technical staff is preparing the car, and who is flying is not known?



        A technician works only with his aircraft. A flight crew is a variable value.
        The fact is that the engineer has his own plans for the operation of the sides, and the squadron commander for the advancement of the flight crew according to the KBP programs has his own.
        1. Sergey-72
          Sergey-72 24 March 2018 20: 25
          +1
          A technician works only with his aircraft. A flight crew is a variable value.

          The number of crews and vehicles in the squadron is not =? or it turns out there is a second composition in case of illness-holidays-business trips?
          1. shuravi
            shuravi 24 March 2018 20: 37
            +2
            Quote: Sergey-72
            A technician works only with his aircraft. A flight crew is a variable value.

            The number of crews and vehicles in the squadron is not =? or it turns out there is a second composition in case of illness-holidays-business trips?



            Just the same. Each plane has its own pilot (crew). But drugs have vacations, illnesses, business trips, outfits, and it’s just that they fly overnight to SMU, and the lieutenant has admissions to PMU day, it’s clear that he does not fly.
            Also, airplanes can be on schedule, overhaul, replacement of units.
            Well, such an example, there is a limit on the number of landings. And if the pilot is scheduled to fly in a circle, then he will choose his limit in a maximum of an hour and a half.
            A six-hour flight shift. So one plane for at least four pilots is enough to fly in turn.
            Therefore, not all aircraft are allocated by squadron at the airfield landing site near the aerodrome.
            Haha do pre-flight and post-flight training on three machines, if three aircraft with the head enough for one aircraft.
            1. Sergey-72
              Sergey-72 24 March 2018 21: 08
              +1
              Thank you, the principle is clear. We came to the conclusion that pilot R. Filipov flew on this board while serving in this unit (squadron).
            2. NN52
              NN52 24 March 2018 21: 12
              +1
              Something you are confused here a little ...

              We had eight-hour shifts. At the task setting, on the eve of the flight shift, the number of serviceable aircraft was determined (this concept includes a lot, and regulations and resource and failures and regulations, etc.)
              A planned flight table was compiled and pilots signed for airplanes, and it doesn’t matter which side from which squadron, regimental flights ...
              And naturally, the planned one was drawn up in accordance with the KBP and the level of training of each pilot.
              There weren’t enough boards at that time, and now too ...

              I just don’t understand what are you arguing about?
              1. shuravi
                shuravi 24 March 2018 21: 29
                +1
                Quote: NN52
                Something you are confused here a little ...

                We had eight-hour shifts.



                Well, yes, eight hours. I confused it with a maximum flight per AA pilot per shift.


                A planned flight table was compiled and pilots signed for airplanes, and it doesn’t matter which side from which squadron, regimental flights ...


                Planned tables with a schedule of pilots on the sides made up the castle masks.
                Then they were made a summary planning table.



                There weren’t enough boards at that time, and now too ...


                Do not confuse the combat readiness and serviceability of the material part of the squadron with the withdrawal of the sides at the UTP.

                I just don’t understand what are you arguing about?


                Yes, no argument. I’m just explaining that the pilot didn’t fly only on a fixed plane.
                And on what account.
                1. NN52
                  NN52 24 March 2018 21: 54
                  +1
                  Well and good.