Where did the tradition of military prowess come from - Russian “Hurray!”?

80


Since ancient times, the Russian army went on the attack on the enemy, using the militant and terrifying “Hurray!” Of course, there is an analogue of this cry in almost every modern language, but it is “Hurray!” That Russian is the most “recognizable” in the world. In the very word there is a certain call to action aimed at a decisive victory over the enemy. The call helps shoulder to shoulder to go on the attack, even against such an enemy, whose number is many times greater than the number of Russian troops. “Hurray!” Opponents of the Russian military units heard in the Alps, near Moscow, in Stalingrad, on the Manchurian hills. This victorious “Hurray!” Often made the enemy start and give in to an inexplicable panic.

Let us try to consider several versions about where this word came from, which inspires some and terrifies others. Immediately I must say that there are several versions concerning the appearance of the word “Hurray!”. Often, one version contrasts so much with the version of the other that it is difficult to understand how they could appear at all without points of mutual touch.

Hypothesis the first. The Russian word “Hurray!”, As well as a number of other words, is borrowed from Turkic. According to this version, the word “Hurray!” Is a kind of modification of the word “jur”, meaning “animated” or “moving”. By the way, in the modern Bulgarian language there is the word "Jurassic", which has exactly the Turkic root and means "attacking".

The second hypothesis. According to this version, “Hurray!” Again has Turkic roots, but it comes from the word “Urman”, which in Russian means the verb “beat”. In Azeri language, the word “wur” can be found, which means “hit”. It is possible that the word “Vura!” Was transformed into the widely known today “Hurray!”.

Hypothesis the third. If again refer to the Bulgarian language, that is, in it the word "Urga". This can be translated as “top” or “up”. It is possible that with the word “Hurray!”, At first, a certain ascent to the mountain peak was associated, and this encouragement cry was used to encourage those who had conquered their “Olympus”.

The fourth hypothesis. The Mongols-Tatars allegedly, unwillingly, themselves “taught” the Russians to use such a battle cry during an attack. They say that during the attacks of the Mongol-Tatar warriors they used the cry “Uraksha!” Or “Uragsha!”, Which is a derivative of the word “Urakh”. In turn, the word "urakh" means all the same Russian "forward."

Hypothesis the fifth. The word "Hurray!" Belongs precisely to the Slavic tribes. It is possible that it was transformed from the words “Uraz”, which means “strike”, or (after the baptism of Russia) from the word “U paradise” - the modern version “to paradise”.

Hypothesis Six. This call comes from the Lithuanian "lie", which can also be translated as "a call to attack" or simply "forward."

All these versions have the right to exist, but the whole problem lies in the fact, and when exactly did the word “Hurray!” First appear as something independent and used only by Russian troops.

However, it is possible to reflect for a long time about the origins of the appearance of the world-famous Russian “Hurray!” In fact, the main thing here is the very semantic coloring of the word. After all, if these letters are enough to raise the spirit of militant warriors, it means that this word contains truly phenomenal meaning.

The word "Hurray!" Is used in many literary works. Pushkin also wrote his famous “Far away burst out“ Hurray! ”. But they say that the use of the word “Hurray!”, To put it mildly, was not welcomed by Peter the Great during the battle. Regarding this, there is a unique document from 1706 of the year, which stated how soldiers and officers need to behave in battle. In this document there are surprising words that the officers of the Russian army should have been careful that the soldiers did not allow themselves to shout on the battlefield. However, whether such a ban related precisely to the words “Hurray!” Is a rather dubious fact. Perhaps Tsar Peter forbade his soldiers to shout on the battlefield, so as not to sow panic. After all, it often happens that a scream can easily provoke the most unpredictable reaction.

As punishment "screamers" relied the death penalty on the battlefield. Therefore, there is a version that Pushkin decided to use the word “Hurray!” Only to give his work an expressive color. But in fact, Peter allegedly urged the military to use the word "Viva!" To create an army similar to all European.

But after the death of Tsar Peter I, the fashion for “Hurray!” Began to appear again in Russia. And if during this cry the panic arose, then it appeared in the camp of the enemy, and not in Russian parts. The word “Hurray!” Has now begun to appear in official documents. In one of these documents, Field Marshal Rumyantsev used this appeal to express loyalty to his Empress Elizabeth.

Since then, the word "Hurray!" Began to acquire the meaning that we put into it today. Even the highest military ranks during the battles allowed themselves to use the battle Russian cry to lead their army. Today it is difficult to imagine the silent hand-to-hand attack of the Russian army. It does not fit in with the mentality of our people. The word "Hurray!" Here appears as an emotional springboard that takes hatred of the enemy to a new level.

So, the Russian “Hurray!” Is our national, as it is now fashionable to say, brand. And what other people used (used) in similar cases.

For example, the Romans went on the attack with strange words for us. They shouted “Long live death!” You will agree that such a call would hardly inspire a Russian soldier.

Medieval Europeans fled to the attack with a pretentious "God and my right!" That would certainly hardly inspire the Russians.

The Germans shouted their "Forward!", And the soldiers of Napoleon's army - "For the emperor!"

An interesting borrowing of the Russian “Hurray!” Happened on the part of the Germans. Hearing this Russian cry, the Germans from the 19 century also began to use it often, realizing the power this word carries in itself. The word "Hurra" appeared even in the Prussian military charter.

No less interesting situation with the word “Hurray!” Is also related to the French troops. The Russian “Hurray!” Was initially perceived by the French as “broken”, “Oh ra”, which can be translated as “To the rat!” This offended them, and in response, the French began to shout “To the cat”, which sounds like “O Sha”

Since those times, the Turks have started shouting Russian “hurray”. It is surprising that if the word “Hurray!” Has Turkic roots, then it turns out that the Turks borrowed their own word from us. Prior to that, they shouted during the attack the word "Allah" ("Allah").

Historically, the word “Hurray!” In one form or another has migrated to the army of modern foreign countries.

However, there are those peoples who are accustomed to using purely national expressions. For example, Ossetians shout “Marga!”, Which means “kill”. The Japanese shout the famous "Banzai!", Which translates as "10 thousands of years." Why "10 Thousands of Years"? Yes, because it is for so many years that they wish to live for their emperor, and “banzai” is only the end of the whole phrase, which is not quite convenient to pronounce in battle. Israeli soldiers shout the word "Hedad!", Which is a kind of echo echo.
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    28 February 2012 08: 45
    The Kazakh word "Ur" is translated "Hit, hit, strike". What supports the second hypothesis is the ancient connection with the Turkic roots.
    1. Shveik
      +3
      28 February 2012 12: 43
      There are many more versions: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%B0! I like best - what comes from the ancient Egyptian RA (the sun god) and Hurray! - means WE ARE GODS!
      Although it seems that the soldier’s attack most often comes not from URA but from & @) # *! & @ & !! (obscenities), somewhere I read that obscenities (not all, some) are also the names of the ancient Slavic gods.
      1. +3
        29 February 2012 02: 57
        As a hypothetical option, I currently like this translation most of all.
    2. ZHORA
      -8
      28 February 2012 15: 24
      The whole history of Russia and Russian statehood has Turkic roots, but for some reason Russians are embarrassed by this ...
      1. +6
        28 February 2012 15: 49
        The history of the Russian state has many roots, and it is of no use to emphasize precisely the Turkic, in view of their insignificance among others.
        Mathematically accurate information about the roots and habitat is provided by genetic studies that have become publicly available in the last couple of years.
        No less interesting are language studies, customs, and ornaments.
        1. ZHORA
          -10
          28 February 2012 18: 01
          Language studies are very interesting))) So studies by Academician Shakhmatov have shown that more than 55% of the linguistic constructions of the Russian language are Church Slavs, the rest is lexical borrowings from Ukrainian, Polish, Belarusian, Latinism and Turkism. Let me remind you that Church Slavonic was created artificially on the basis of the Solunsky dialect of the Bulgarian language and took root in the territory of present-day Russia only because there were no national Slavic languages ​​there. About the whole mat which is of Turkic origin, I will not say anything)) The style of government is a copy of the Golden Horde, Finno-Ugric customs, partially Slavic and Turkic. The cocktail is fun.
          1. +1
            28 February 2012 18: 05
            Even more light will be shed by a comprehensive study of the term "Slavic", its demolition from the pedestal and the illumination of its abusive meaning as used by the invaders of the Russian land.
          2. +1
            29 February 2012 02: 59
            Ah Zhora, Zhora and why am I so bad?
          3. 0
            April 19 2017 08: 10
            Well, without Ukrainian borrowings, the Russian language is no where! Just nonsense.
      2. +1
        28 February 2012 16: 11
        Statehood of Russia comes more from Byzantium .... so that this attack does not pass .....
        1. ZHORA
          -12
          28 February 2012 17: 42
          These are your desires, but in fact from the Golden Horde, and there is nothing to be ashamed of and stick to the history of other peoples. And the former Muscovy had nothing to do with Rus Russia.
          1. +4
            29 February 2012 03: 06
            Joke. The Elephant sits at home, hears the doorbell, comes up to open the door to no one. After a while, another bell rings, gets up, comes up, opens the door again for no one. The third time the doorbell rings, he is already quickly running up to the door, opening up to no one, he looks out the door angry, looks at the button of the door lock, a mosquito sits. Mosquito asks the Elephant: "Do you hear the Elephant the Elephant at home?" The elephant says no. Then the Mosquito says "Tell the Elephant Zhora came in."
          2. Passing
            +4
            2 March 2012 17: 47
            Quote: JORA
            These are your desires, but in fact from the Golden Horde, and there is nothing to be ashamed of and stick to the history of other peoples. And the former Muscovy had nothing to do with Rus Russia.

            ZHORA, and how much are they now paying to the Polish-American henchmen? Your argument is a stupid distortion of facts, and no one here is impressive. By your methods, I will prove to you in two respects that the Urains are not Slavs at all.
            Compare the territory of Kievan Rus

            And present Ukraine

            From this it can be seen that the Uraintsy are some kind of a cross between Magyars, Khazars, Crimean Tatras and don’t understand what.
            In short, Ukrainians are Magyar-Tatars.
            Bullshit of course, but this is an example of your logic. Understand, people gathered here are smarter than you. Do not disgrace your stupidity in People.
          3. +4
            19 March 2012 13: 12
            For that matter, the so-called. "Muscovy" has managed to create its own Great History, civilization and culture. Including absorbing and embodying not only ancient Russia, but also assimilating many other, less viable and less perfect civilizations and cultures. Preserving both traditions and territories. Created in practice, and not with empty chatter, as the so-called. "svidomye", trying to give at least some historical justification to the useless western political project "independent Ukraine".
          4. 0
            April 19 2017 08: 13
            Well, in this case, the so-called Ukrainians are almost all Turks. And do not be shy about this and the shalvars and forelocks, and the black-eyed and dark-haired sisters, and the couple aren’t from there. And do not be shy of their roots.
        2. 0
          28 February 2012 18: 20
          Here it would be remembered
          who is Tarquinius, who is patrician,
          what is the Latin language and plebeians,
          when and in what form did it come to which lands. And not in reverse order, which is easy to see.
        3. ZHORA
          -7
          28 February 2012 18: 21
          In the middle of the XNUMXth century, the Moscow princes recognized themselves as younger brothers of the Giraev clan, and the Crimean khans as their kings. At the same time, they got the support and patronage of the ruling dynasty, as well as certain rights and obligations to "collect the land of the Golden Horde" into a new unified state headed by the Girai.
          Since the beginning of the XVI century, when Crimea became a vilayet (province) of the Ottoman caliphate, the Sultan in Istanbul began to be considered the supreme ruler for Muscovy, however, as they say now, the right of “operational control” was still owned by Crimean khans.
          It is known that Ivan III (Ivan the Terrible’s grandfather), in a sign of his vassal position in front of the Crimean Khan, took the oath of allegiance to the Giraev house on the Bible, recognizing them as heirs of the Genghis Khan family. This oath was strictly observed until 1700, and Muscovy paid tribute to the Crimean Khanate, as its sovereign and master.
          The famous Russian historian S.M. Soloviev in the collection "Readings and Stories on Russian History", "the Turks were terribly exhausted (by 1700 by continuous wars) and made peace, ceded to Russia Azov with all sorts of old and new towns, already built by Peter; and the Crimean Khan had to refuse the tribute that Russia had been paying him until now under the specious name of commemoration or gifts "/ p. 502-503./
          Muscovy and under Ivan the Terrible, in the second half of the end of the XVI century, paid tribute to the Crimea, like the kings of the Golden Horde. But Russian imperial historians desperately ignore Moscow’s dependence on the Crimean Khanate, clearly refuting the very fact of Muscovy’s independent existence as a kingdom in the XNUMXth century.
          However, being a vassal of the Crimea, Muscovy in this position also had benefits. The Crimean khans provided Muscovy with constant military and political support, in the so-called Livonian war. It was as a result of the support of Crimea that the troops of Ivan the Terrible won one victory after another at the beginning of the war.
          But since 1563, relations between Muscovy and the Crimean Khanate began to change dramatically. And in 1570, the Ottoman sultan Suleiman Kanuni demanded the liquidation of the autonomy of Muscovy.
          Here is what the historian K. Valishevsky wrote in his book "Ivan the Terrible":
          "From 1563 to 1570 Ivan tried in vain to prevent the Tatar invasion ... Unsuccessfully his ambassadors, like Naked and Rzhevskiy, came to the khan with peace-loving speeches and magnificent gifts ... But the sultan demanded the return of Kazan and Astrakhan and the recognition of the Moscow state as a subject of the Port "./ p. 224./
          The reason for the overlords ’dissatisfaction with their vassal was as follows: in 1561 Muscovy received a fraudulent invitation letter from the Patriarch of Constantinople, where Ivan IV was recognized as the direct heir to the Byzantine emperors. Either this deceitful letter became the work of Moscow church rulers, or it was composed for money in Constantinople, without the knowledge of the Ecumenical Holy Council. Not the point. The very fact of the encroachment of Ivan IV on the legacy of the ancient title of the Byzantine Caesar was recorded in 1561.
          Naturally, for several years this infringement of the Moscow prince was reported to the Crimean Khan, who quite rightly considered Ivan IV to be his subject.
          Ivan IV's cunning resourcefulness did not help. Khan Devlet Girai decided to teach a lesson to the obstinate impostor who had infringed on the title of the Byzantine emperor. And in 1571, the troops of the Crimean Khan moved to Muscovy. The Moscow princes came forward to meet the Crimean cavalry and stopped at the borders of the r. Oki. However, the Crimean Khan bypassed the Muscovites and set out on a forced march straight to Moscow. The Moscow prince fled at first without looking back into the Yaroslavl forests, but then came to negotiate with the "merciful brother."
          Here is how N. Karamzin describes those events in the "History of the Russian State":
          "On June 15, he (Ivan IV) approached Moscow and stopped in Bratovshchina, where they introduced him to two messengers from Davlet-Girey, who, leaving Russia (Muscovy), as a stately winner, wanted to sincerely explain himself to him (Ivan IV) ... When Ioannov asked about the health of his brother, Davlet-Girey, the Khansky official replied: “This is what our Tsar says to you: ... I looked everywhere for you, in Serpukhov and in Moscow itself; wanted a crown from your head: but you fled from Serpukhov, fled from Moscow - and you dare to boast of your Tsarist greatness, having neither courage nor shame! .. I will come to you again ... if you do not do what I require, and do not give me a letter of oath for yourself, for your children and your grandchildren. "What did John do? .. Beat Khan with his forehead."

          Russian full-time historians constantly convinced that these "wild Tatar barbarians" came to Muscovy in order to commit robberies and robberies. They avoided giving explanations for the Devlet Girai military campaign. By such simple methods, the princes of Moscow were relieved of responsibility for the robberies caused by their fault, and they stubbornly remained silent that in this case the Crimean khan came to punish the vassal tributary for ordinary disobedience.
          Ivan the Terrible had no choice but to "strike with his forehead" Khan Devlet Giray and, apparently, to give the so-called "oath certificate for himself, for his children and for his grandchildren," as all his ancestors took such oaths. So, the clan of the Moscow Rurikovich, until its last tribe, remained in vassals among the Horde, and then among the Crimean khans.

          Devlet Girai left Muscovy, taking the promise from the tsar that he would give up his plans, otherwise, he promised to come back with the army.

          Ivan the Terrible understood well that Muscovy would not stand the second blow from the Crimeans. Therefore, he decided on a forced and fully conscious act, which in the generally accepted history is interpreted as "a strange whim of the king's extravagance." In 1575, he publicly resigned the title of tsar - the heir to the Byzantine, renounced the throne in favor of his distant relative, the Kasimov khan Sain-Bulat, and for several years left for the Aleksandrovskaya Sloboda.

          Sain Bulat adopted the royal title according to all the relying canons of the Byzantine emperor. And Ivan IV from that time lost his false title, and became known, like his ancestors, as the Moscow prince. With an act of renunciation, Ivan the Terrible demonstrated to the Crimean Khan and the Ottoman caliphate that he was not claiming primacy.

          Immediately after the abdication of Ivan IV from the imperial title, a great embassy was equipped with rich gifts in Bakhchisarai in order to report to Girayam about these events, explain everything and repent of the misunderstanding that had arisen earlier.

          Here is how Ivan IV admonished his ambassador: "... behave quietly, run away with caustic speeches, and if the Khan or Nobles remember him about the times of Kalita and the King Uzbek, then do not show anger, but respond quietly: I do not know the old days; God knows it and you , Sovereigns! "

          The penultimate representative of the Moscow clan of the Rurikovich clearly recognized his ancient dependent kinship with the great Genghisides. Girai put Ivan IV in that dynastic row and in the place where he was supposed to be. However, much later, the Russian ruling elite tried to compose otherwise, and thereby tried to pass off a lie as truth.
          1. +3
            28 February 2012 18: 28
            Zhora ....
            Who is the author of this study?

            And if you turn to Nosovsky-Fomenko?
            And if to Alexander Bushkov?
            And if to Alexei Kungurov?

            The version, of course, is interesting ... but a bit long, the thread ... is lost ...

            Putin, too, has been serving as prime minister for 4 years ..
            1. ZHORA
              -6
              28 February 2012 18: 36
              Yes, all the facts are available, only since the creation of the imperial myth started by Peter the First and FORCED! the advantages of the decree of Peter the Muscovy to Russia, they were carefully silent. The history of Muscovy actually comes from Ivan Kalita, and he was an enemy of Russia!

              “From childhood, from the pages of state history textbooks, we were drummed into our heads that Russia traces its history from ancient Russia, and therefore is its heir, the national state of the Russian people, acting in its interests.
              In fact, Russia traces its history from a later time, namely from 1327, when the Mongol khan Uzbek decided to create a puppet state on the occupied Russian territories by the Horde, consisting of Russian traitors.

              The fact is that the giant Mongol empire needed local "policemen" to control the situation in such vast areas, and the constant Russian anti-Mongol uprisings, which threatened to result in the expulsion of the invaders from Russia, demanded the involvement of local collaborators in the service of the empire. And such traitors were found - they were headed by the prince of the then provincial city of Moscow Ivan Kalita.

              He decided, relying on the Mongol spears and bows, to expand his possessions at the cost of betrayal of the Russian liberation struggle. And for this he received a label (authority of the governor) and military assistance from Uzbekistan. In exchange, Ivan Kalita was supposed to suppress all Russian anti-Mongol speeches, which he did with sophisticated cruelty, as is typical of all the traitors of his people. As the famous historian L.V. Cherepnin wrote, “This prince (Kalita) brutally suppressed those spontaneous popular movements that undermined the foundations of the Horde’s domination over Russia ... They brutally cracked down on their opponents from among other Russian princes without disdaining Tatar help for this "Kalita has achieved a significant increase in the power of the Moscow principality."
              Time passed, and the Horde, obeying the eternal law of the collapse of all empires, gradually weakened. And the puppet Muscovy created by her - on the contrary, became more and more strengthened, capturing the Russian principalities. In the end, the Horde sank into oblivion, and Muscovy set off on an "independent voyage." However, this was no longer Russia, it was the heiress of the Horde, blood from blood and flesh from flesh. The Moscow tsars, the first of whom was the notorious Ivan the Terrible, by the nature of their unlimited power were the very khans. It was even worse, since the power of the khan rested only on his cruelty and personal authority, while the power of the kings was also based on religious implications adopted in Orthodox Byzantium, which broke away from the single Christian Church. The tsar was proclaimed the "anointed" of God and in fact stood over the people and over the Church, concentrating in his hands both secular and religious power. He was not even like the khans, but the pagan Roman emperors of the era of the decline of ancient civilization, who possessed absolute power and, as a rule, were insane (remember Nero). This concept was clearly expressed in his letters to the fugitive Prince Andrei Kurbsky by the Moscow "Nero" Ivan the Terrible, who wrote that all Russians are his "slaves" whom he is free to execute or have mercy on his own whim, since he is "God's anointed".

              Having got rid of the patronage of its Mongol creators, Muscovy first of all finished off the remaining free Russian lands - first of all, of course, the free and prosperous Novgorod Republic, which was even a member of the Hanseatic League and had such a developed democracy that no European states of that time could even dream of it. The Muscovites, under the leadership of their "God-bearing" tsar, plundered Novgorod and staged a real massacre of the Russian population there. Since then, Novgorod has forever turned from a prosperous pearl of Europe into a gray provincial city with a poor population, like all cities in Russia, with the exception of Moscow. "
              1. +5
                28 February 2012 18: 42
                Zhora, Zhora ... do not get excited ...
                I understand that we are Muscovites. and the other Chechens who have clung to us now are not worthy of life ...
                Only I asked about something else ... - who is the author of this work that you are now showing us? , ... and only .. The author is who?

                The fact that he uses the concept - Genghisides .... for me this is enough.
                So ".. where is his button, Uri ?? .." - who is the author?
                1. Alfa
                  +1
                  29 March 2012 05: 15
                  The Chechens did not cling to themselves, but were conquered by Russia. But indigestion came out. And now we are tormented.
              2. +5
                28 February 2012 20: 49
                And where in the evidence base is the reference to the Globe of Independent Ukraine? Yes, we still have "Saint" Vladimir sorted out relations with brothers in civil strife. That is still "house2". But for me it’s better to be a barbarian from Mordor, who destroyed Rome, than "Ivan who does not remember his kinship" from Nezalezhnoy, with a complex of historical inferiority.
                Yes, and the Tatar is my brother, if he thinks in the language of Pushkin.
              3. +6
                28 February 2012 22: 58
                So it’s still non-profit from being trapped, they have their own scientists from Anglo-Saxony, that is, their masters, and even their lords from Poland from sea to sea !!! laughing
          2. +4
            29 February 2012 03: 12
            Anectode. A Behemoth sits on the bank of the river and cries, tears dripping into his palm. Suddenly a frog jumps out of the water onto his palm. The hippopotamus asks through tears: "Who are you?" The frog answers I'm Zhora. "The hippopotamus slaps himself with this palm on his forehead." Oh, Zhora, Zhora, if only you knew how I was. "
      3. Alfa
        0
        29 March 2012 04: 43
        All is correct. I support.
    3. southmen
      +3
      28 February 2012 18: 24
      Just wanted to write about it! I think this is the most correct option. I’ve known about this version for about forty years.
      1. +1
        28 February 2012 18: 35
        Anyway, Zhora ...
        judging by the flag - Ukrainian .... what kind of fic Girai? ... and Chornobai igde? Muscovy promised them a tribute from the summer of 4076 from creation ..
        it's just a joke .. don’t be angry, please.
        1. ZHORA
          +1
          28 February 2012 18: 46
          The joke is not a joke but the fact that Sain-Bulat Khan (Simeon Bekbulatovich) was on the royal throne and was seated on the kingdom in the fall of 1575 in the Assumption Cathedral of the Kremlin by Ivan the Terrible is undeniable and undeniable!

          "... he planted Simeon Bekbulatovich as tsar in Moscow and crowned him with a royal crown, and he called himself Ivan of Moscow and left the city, lived on Petrovka; he gave all his tsar's rank to Simeon, and he himself went just like a boyar, in shafts ..."
          Solovyov S. M. "History of Russia since ancient times"

          Are you looking for the origin of the word "Hurray!" yes it is obvious ... the battle cry of the Horde warriors ...
          1. +1
            28 February 2012 18: 55
            That's it ... Zhora ... so we got to the point ...
            Simeon Bekbulatovich .... there is where ... the truth-sabaka is buried ...
            Please bring the full title of the esteemed Simeon Bekbulatovich, if it does not complicate ...
            I’ll be very surprised - if there are no words in the title - saint ...

            I'm waiting ...
          2. +8
            28 February 2012 20: 17
            It seems .. I can’t wait ...
            Then I will end like this ...
            I will not speak - Russian ... I will not speak Russian, I will not speak Bulgarian ... I will speak Ordynskaya ....
            At the turn of the 11th-12th centuries, it became clear to normal peoples living through needlework and organization of society - we won’t streamline the way along the Volga (in the current reading ... Excuse me, if I stop wagging, it will be more clear) - the Caspian Sea - the Aral Sea - Amu Daria - the Persian the gulf - kirdyk will come from the pirates ...
            Dashing little people - always a shaft -........... to do so ... was proud?
            So - at the turn of the 7th-10th centuries BC (keep in mind, using traditional chronology) - the state that straddled the confluence of the two largest rivers in Europe - the Kama and Volga - became the LORD ... Volga Bulgaria ... and by no means embroidering some Khazaria there .... two points of application are always better, than one ...
            We look further ... there is one more merger - the Oka and the Volga .... Pop my eyes - even more interesting .... here you have deposits of the swamp IRON (haralug - famous)., Here you have forests, here you and the population - calm, listless ... Finns, one word
            Ay guys ... how many opinions ... no one ever even tried to figure it out .... - ah, PACHIMUY_TA - Russian Atstalyia? ...
            Got it ... ALREADY - to argue with you ... opponents ... RUSSIA ...
            One fact of the dispute ... is already getting enough ... to at least get rid of it ... get out ....
            Russia-was and will be .... because the original ....
            we’ll warm everyone else, feed, caress, once again we’ll run into the same rake ....
            We are Russia ....

            And there have always been - Russia .. They were called differently .. 7-10 centuries - Bulgaria, 10-11 centuries - Kievan Rus .. 11-14 centuries - Ancient Russia, Muscovy .. WE are the only state in life. In our life, religion and lifestyle have changed. We were everything .. we will become everything ..
            We .... - ... RUSSIAN.
            1. Alfa
              -1
              29 March 2012 05: 32
              [everyone else we’ll warm, feed, caress, once again we’ll run into the same rake]
              First - Who feeds whom?
              In vorory - We conquered the Urals, Siberia, Wed. Asia, the Caucasus, we came there with swords, not with gingerbread cookies.
              So what are we better than the Golden Horde?
              1. pioneer
                0
                20 October 2012 21: 09
                Tatars were kicked out of Siberia who fled from Central Asia to conquer this very Siberia. Kuchum was a prince from the Central Asians. The Urals were mastered by the Novgorodians in the 10-12 centuries. Open the pre-revolutionary textbooks and read how, starting with Ivan IV, the Caucasus requested under the Russian hand. It was enough for Ivan Vasilievich to write a letter to the Persian Shah as all military preparations for an attack on the Georgian kingdoms were instantly over. And Russia was forced to conquer Central Asia. The good that came with the Russian people to the representatives of Central Asia must be constantly reminded. And in general, one must know the history of one’s own people much better before speaking publicly.
          3. Alfa
            0
            29 March 2012 05: 20
            Battle cry of the Horde warriors - Urrah!
            1. 0
              April 8 2024 17: 24
              The Lithuanian battle cry is "virai", which can be translated as "call to attack" or simply "forward".
              English battle cry Hurray! or other option Hurray!
              Are the British also Horde?
        2. +1
          28 February 2012 19: 02
          Not supposed to - answer yourself ... mess

          Horde warriors - about which, you, Zhora. write - this would not be approved ...
          taking into account the fact that - by the Horde, Horde - they called Redeemed from slavery - whether soldiers or prostitutes - it does not matter.
          Himself paid off, bought off - and the trace of a lifetime ... that means he could not die with dignity ... not people ..
          1. +3
            28 February 2012 19: 21
            Here an interesting moment arises - responsibility ....
            Not a human ... a Horde ... not fulfilling his duty to the end ("" I mean that before all sorts of fainting, hemorrhoids, loss of orientation - did not bother ") - is not capable - do not fight ..
            types of punishments for soldiers who have not fulfilled a duty:
            Osmania (Sultanate) - a silk lace as a gift - strangle-hang-swallow and choke - it's your business .. you can’t cope, help ... (and Persia and Egypt - together)
            China and Japan - even the emperor’s opinions are not needed - the Seppuku (Harakiri) rite - do not suffer, brother, we’ll blow our heads at a pace ....
            Europe - long and tedious ways of settling accounts with life (knightly tournaments, gladiatorial fights ... - the essence is the same)
            Russia - before Catherine ... no one could have thought that the life of the service person belongs to someone else but the sovereign - the bearer of statehood ... then it went - all sorts of duel ... confusion, in short.
            You can add more ... but "Russian roulette" is the judgment of God - ... the apotheosis of Russianness !!
    4. +2
      29 February 2012 02: 55
      And the Uzbeks say the same. As I remember now, during clashes with them, they encouraged each other drgua "ur, ur". I also thought then (they called the Russians Urus), whether this "ur urus" came from the Mongol Khan - beat the Russian.
  2. schta
    +6
    28 February 2012 09: 29
    As they say: "Forward, ..., shouting" Hurray! ", ...!"
    (sorry, but you won’t erase the words from the song) ...

    In addition, the seventh hypothesis: Hurray arose on its own in the mouths of Russian soldiers in the midst of a great battle.

    It's just the sounds themselves in the word "UR-A-A-A-A-A-A-A !!!" sound much better than "IYYAYAYAYA" or "HAYYYAYAYAYA". A growling "R" sound adds aggression, and the ending "A-A-A-A-A" is easiest to shout.

    As you can see, the machine gunner shouts the end of the combat "Hurray!"
  3. serge
    +12
    28 February 2012 09: 53
    The most ancient name of the sacred Russian river Volga is the river "Ra". God - RA - God-Creator, Fiery God, the Sun - the most ancient god of the Russian people (and the Aryan peoples in general). Rarog (a falcon, by the way, the Egyptian RA was depicted with the head of a falcon), Raseya (later Russia), Rainbow, Orthodoxy, cult-u-RA, WORK, PARADISE, TRUTH, RIGHT, Dawn (dawn, sunrise - light of RA), beauty, RA-z-um, Warrior, URAZhay, Joy, Rogue, hello, Rastov, Samara, Saratov, URAL, great-grandfather, courage, battle, guards, edge, country.
    The word URA means "God is with us." We are Russians. God with us. HOORAY!
    1. 0
      28 February 2012 14: 04
      Why else mix the late Semitic interpretation with the name of our river.
      See below.
    2. +3
      28 February 2012 16: 14
      Well this is Zadornov’s theory ....... very controversial ...... but still a plus sign + smile
      1. 0
        28 February 2012 18: 14
        The theme of worship is inseparable from the shameful groveling before any invaders who imagine themselves to be sacred and then Russian, which does not prevent them from blaming the foundations of Russian publicly. However, walk around, not detained. Such are the paradoxes.
        The result is destructive, in moral and then strategic importance.
        No matter how prominent scientists Zadornov may seem to those who despise or ignore the primary sources, it is better to trust your own eyes and ears, draw conclusions based on these studies. The primary sources were preserved in many other nations, where ours passed, but the inquisition of the enslavers did not reach. There are wonderful materials.
      2. pioneer
        0
        20 October 2012 21: 13
        There is such a Russian writer - Alekseev. Zadornov only voiced on TV what Alekseev wrote (Treasures of the Valkyries and his other books).
    3. 0
      28 February 2012 23: 04
      Let me fix it. Not God with us, but we with God !!! Who are we against God! And if God is with us, then who is against us? Urraaaaaaaaaaaa !!!
    4. Alfa
      -1
      29 March 2012 05: 38
      how can a syllable of 2 letters be the root? Man you wander. No.
  4. Volkhov
    +4
    28 February 2012 09: 55
    Translation from Sanskrit "GO" - we are just older, and Peter 1 forbade, in order to tear it from the roots, he cut out the Great Perm in the Urals completely in 1718 with the help of an "army of a new look" in order to destroy the continuity (Perm - from the word "change" - I will learn, it was a center for the storage and transfer of Hyperborean knowledge and it is no coincidence that cast-iron cannons were poured in the Urals 200 years earlier than in Europe).
    1. +2
      28 February 2012 12: 50
      Quote: Volkhov
      it was the center for the storage and transfer of Hyperborean knowledge

      Oh how.
  5. 755962
    +2
    28 February 2012 11: 14
    Hurray - battle cry. Why cheers? What does this cry mean, what is the meaning of it?
    The explanation can be seen when comparing this word with the Armenian war cry, which sounds like: - h'ura, and literally means “fire”, “flame” - (hur). http: //www.litsovet.ru/index.php/materia ...

    Brockhaus and Efron claim:
    Hurray - military clique. It is supposed to shout Hurray when attacking; hence the expression "go to Hurray", i.e. go into hand-to-hand combat - to attack, to storm. The word Ura probably comes from the Tatar ur '= bey (uranium, a war cry among the Kirghiz). During the Napoleonic Wars, the cry of Hurrah came into use among the Western European peoples. With a cry of Ur, the troops greet the Emperor or the commander-in-chief.
    According to Fasmer
    The closest etymology: to raise with a bang, with a bang; judging by the meaning, rather from the new-century-n. hurra "hurray" from the middle-century-n. hurra, which is associated with hurren "to move quickly" (Kluge-Goetze 259 et seq.) than from Türk. urа "beat": urmak "beat" (Goryaev, ES 388; Lokoch 169).
    Trubachev's comment: [Jacobson (IJSLP, 1/2, 1959, p. 273) considers borrowing. straight from Turk. --T.]

    By Dahl
    Hurray, a cry of enthusiastic approval, joy and greetings, courageous encouragement, general encouragement, etc. to exercise, hello; | at once, together, hit! With a cry of cheers, troops meet the sovereign, the floor of the commander. Hurray burst forth: the regiments saw Peter, Pushkin. And the lady cheers shouted, bonnets threw into the air! Griboedov. Hit with a bang, go with a bang, in bayonets, in an attack, in melee. Long live dear master! Hooray! cry of cheers reminds Lithuanian. cry: virai (vir?), and Tatar. ur, hit, from ummak, beat, also Kyrgyz uranium, tribal war cry (see below), and finally ours to beat, hit. Maybe: Se Urim shout under the Polovtsian sabers (the Word of Igor’s regiment) refers here. | Hooray noun. g. casp a bast net, lowered with stones to the bottom, at the stockade of the fish tank so that carp would not undermine it. | A twisted bast net with sinkers, which block fish passages in the lakes, when fishing with a net, a bonfire. Cry, scream cheers. We will dare the adverb. arch. with a cry of cheers. We fight the seal with a cry, with a cry of cheers, throwing at it all the artel at once.
    Mongolian Urashsha means Forward

    The Roman legionnaires shouted "barra".
    1. 0
      28 February 2012 19: 56
      Considering that the cry, most likely, did not arise at all under Prince Igor, and the succession from Byzantium (and from Rome) is most likely from "Barra". And Brockhaus and Efron are not authorities on this issue.
    2. Alfa
      0
      29 March 2012 05: 43
      In my opinion too short to look for meaning in it. It just sounds cool, that's all.
  6. +5
    28 February 2012 11: 34
    Borrowing from Turks, Romanians, Balts is extremely unlikely. Since we began to fight with the Turks much later than the appearance of the word Hurray, the Balts themselves appeared as people and took shape in sufficient numbers in Europe and then Russia 150 years earlier than they started to fight with the Turks. The Tatar Mongol roots of the word are quite probable, but most likely this is a complicated version of the animal roar (from the word growling). Everything is genius simple. And if you listen to it that way. From the side it resembles a tsunami of anger, anger. The element. These words described the attack of the Russian infantry .
  7. lars
    +3
    28 February 2012 11: 40
    There was another option. The ending of the cry "For the ancestor!"
  8. Georg Shep
    +8
    28 February 2012 11: 49
    Without any hypotheses - Russian cheers - this is Russian cheers! And here no one will be mistaken, especially in battle.
  9. predator
    +1
    28 February 2012 12: 05
    Hurrah! this is the cry of the soldiers of Genghis Khan; in the 14th century, Russian soldiers began to use it.
    1. +5
      28 February 2012 14: 29
      And who were Genghis Khan and his fellow tribesmen, if the description of the khan as a red-haired and green-eyed European was preserved?
      That is, those monogols are not at all today.
      1. pioneer
        +1
        20 October 2012 21: 18
        Actually, the term "Mongol" was introduced into scientific circulation by the son of the Tatar Murza Karamzin. Before him, they wrote about the Tatar invasion.
  10. +3
    28 February 2012 12: 20
    And here, what is: a half-moon?
    1. serge
      +3
      28 February 2012 13: 04
      (http://slovari.yandex.ru) HALF. Borrowing in the XIX century. from goal. lang., where val onder "fall down"
      (Ushakov) HALF (or palundra), mezhdun. [from English fall under - fall down]
      On the subject: it's funny, by the way, that our people still attached the ending "ra" to the Dutch "phalander" or the English "follandé".
      1. +1
        28 February 2012 16: 23
        Yes sir! Almost all naval terms came during the time of Peter the Great from Dutch, English .... well, of course. Something remained of Pomor
        The theme of naval language also deserves a separate discussion .... wink .......
  11. +4
    28 February 2012 12: 46
    The people, of course, are interested in conducting linguistic research.
    I myself, it happens, I’ll bend it - I chew on my own.
    And here, with a cry of Hurray - in my opinion, everything is much simpler.
    How the mythical Mongol warriors shouted there, how the no less mythical Roman legionaries shouted there - I don’t know and I won’t guess.
    From experience simply, from polls of friends - this is most often an instinctive cry that allows you to drown out fear, allows you to quickly add blood - Aaaaaaaaaaaa. And all
    And how to start it - from Ur, ... from Barra, Ur, Khurrah - it does not matter.
    Even in advertising, running on roller coasters - ahhhhh, yelling. Who is being attacked?
    To test me, shout simply. Feel the difference. Right away. In the head.

    Ah, half a .. Well, this is a traditional marine cry of danger. He was not interested in etymology. Moreover, only - Ra-a-a-a-a-a remains in the cry.
  12. +9
    28 February 2012 12: 46
    For example, Ossetians shout “Marga!”, Which means “kill”,

    The joke was remembered:

    - When the Russian goes on the attack - he shouts “Hooray!”, Which means “forward”;
    - When the Ossetians go into battle - he shouts “Marga!”, Which means “kill”;
    - When the Georgians go on the attack, he shouts “It is becoming micronized!” Which means “help.”
  13. daxed
    +6
    28 February 2012 13: 48
    People do not argue, in fact we got the battle cry from the Scythian era.
    Before the attack, the leader said to his soldiers: "We will meet at the god Ra", and all the warriors shouted in unison at Ra.
    The gods changed, the cry remained.
    1. +2
      28 February 2012 23: 08
      Names changed God remained.
  14. 0
    28 February 2012 13: 57
    The truth between 5 and 6 hypotheses, the first 4 are false.
    Yer Peter has done a lot of things, good and not very.
    See also indisputable written sources from other peoples where our people have visited (links are now unsuccessful, but without links I will hold on to time).
    _________
    Volkhov pointed to the right side RU Today, 09: 55
  15. black_eagle
    +4
    28 February 2012 19: 24
    Among these theories I am more impressed by the Mongol-Tatar uraksha! But, you can disagree and you will do the right thing, since I have a question: Why are the roots of OUR words everyone looking for in other languages ​​??? Let all the rest of us look for the roots of their words! The word "Hurray" is originally Slavic!
    1. +4
      28 February 2012 19: 34
      But I do not like ... Nigram ... even the Mongol-Tatar ..
      self-name "Mongol", as we understand them - oirat ...
      They are flattered, of course, that they had Croats - as they wanted ..
      Only, is it true ...
      Oh, and also Ukrainian television companies miss this, obviously, not patriotic crap ...
      There were only SLAVES ..... in Europe ....
      1. Alfa
        0
        29 March 2012 05: 52
        Patriotically does not mean false. We must seek the truth, not what we want to hear. If we find a parking of people on Mars, then we’ll immediately shout that there were Slavs. In my opinion it is necessary to be more modest. Modesty beautifies the nation best.
  16. gercog_75
    +1
    28 February 2012 19: 57
    There was no Mongol-Tatar yoke there was a Tatar yoke, just one German historian from Greek translated the word migaleon incorrectly, such as very fucked up, like a Mongol. I myself have not yet verified unbelief. I advise you to find in the internet any old chronicles and with the help of a computer to count the mention of the words Tatars and Mongol in the texts. I got 138 against 1 unbelieve check. wink
    1. -1
      28 February 2012 20: 39
      We believe, we believe ... the current is very chaotic and invariable ... check out your thought transceiver for the first time .. please ..
  17. slan
    +1
    28 February 2012 20: 41
    Well, where are the moderators? Again, here this ukrodegenerat fucked up the whole topic.
    But you’re engaged in garbage, you limit the minimum length of comments ..
    1. slan
      0
      1 March 2012 23: 18
      It's about JOПRU of course.
  18. 37dmds
    +1
    28 February 2012 23: 33
    I stick more to Sergei Alekseev. Sorry for the post. This is from the book "Treasures of the Valkyrie".
    "Var-Var" was interpreted as an exclamation, a battle cry
    ancient Aryans, preserved in Slavic tribes BC, whence
    there was also their name - barbarians. The concepts "RA" and "AR" - sun and earth -
    existed inextricably, which proved the distorted sound of these words, and
    cumulatively. In the name of Mount ARARAT, the ancient arias put the meaning of the connection
    earth and sun. Light and heat kindled the earth, made it look like
    the sun, suitable for human existence, for the arias are the peoples of Ara
    considered themselves literally children of the light of the sun. Therefore their exclamation
    "Var" meant heat, earthly fire, heat, and the word "heat" was its synonym.
    (This is where the verbs "cook", "fry", the name
    "firebird.") The battle cry of the Aryans glorified this earthly fire, as it were. AND
    after victory they glorified the sun with a cry - Hurray! - which is preserved and
    to this day and meant the triumph of light - "by the sun!" - over the darkness. Antonym-
    a word of the opposite meaning - there was a bitter sigh, also existing and
    to this day - Alas! - that is, literally "at the darkness!", for the plural - YOU
    - called darkness. Therefore, the impudent princes, plotting campaigns against enemies,
    said "I'm going to you!" not at all out of respect for the enemy, but definitely
    determined the goal of the upcoming battle - the battle with darkness.
    And it turns out that this is why you cannot call God "you" ...
  19. Nilfgaard
    +1
    29 February 2012 03: 17
    And I like the version about paradise more. Especially if you recall how they brought up warriors who were taught they are not afraid of anyone but God. And that death for their homeland will make him a holy warrior. For me it’s so logical) But this is of course IMHO.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgn_0u-Dm9I&feature=g-like&context=G22b491fALT01H
    3wBVAA by the way was very surprised by this program. Who will find the original let me know.
    1. 0
      29 February 2012 16: 43
      + + + +
      Mi-8 they do not like, neighing!
      -
      Discovery could not do without adverts of the gidostan, but, of course, the Russian warrior bowed his head to Zion, naturally. The impression spoils.
      Slightly.
    2. Alfa
      +1
      29 March 2012 05: 56
      Religion is needed for this - to send people to death without fear. Like for God's sake, Allah, etc.
      1. 0
        29 March 2012 16: 20
        Exactly. For the king, for the priest, for Jehovah, for the grandmother hedgehog, and so on.
        Because without a zombie by these fairy-tale characters, a normal person will not go far from his family, take away someone else’s bread.
  20. +1
    29 February 2012 08: 28
    In English, the same thing is available ........ if anyone remembers Boney M- "Hurrey, Hurrey itz e holliday ..." - something like this ....., translated - Hurray, hurray ... holiday ..... so that everything is not so simple
    1. slan
      0
      29 February 2012 23: 19
      Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
      Hurray, Hurray Itz E Holliday

      By the way, yes.
      And instead of "OH" they have "OOPS" and instead of "AH" - "WOW"))
      Oh, and a "linguist" author, he would have a shovel in his hands, and energy into a creative channel ..
      I suppose I’ve already prepared to write the next article on the topic “where did the tradition come from .. Russian“ OH! ”?"
  21. 0
    29 February 2012 19: 17
    By the way, just now I read something from Mikhail Weller. As usual under Peter the Great, there were also many Englishmen in the service. The answer appeared - "Yes". It turns out such a thing that comes from "Yes, sir" for short. Considering such abbreviations of words in the military environment, it may well be.
  22. +1
    29 February 2012 20: 51
    The word commentary-ary means aria-commentary, and not just someone else's. And so on.
    We must not go too far!
    Learn languages, soberly compare sources.
  23. slan
    +1
    29 February 2012 23: 01
    Strangely, no one ever wrote that in Russian the word "hurray" primarily means an enthusiastic exclamation of joy. Russian people use this word from infancy and by no means on the eve of a fight. It is only natural to go on the attack with a cheer. This is probably how this tradition was born, quite naturally. Why cheers? You can make out where the word "midnight" came from, "dusk" "early in the morning" .. but guessing where the word "night" came from is the height of idiocy. The night went from the night, another thing is that the pronunciation changed, the word was transformed from the same Old Aryan, the English came out "night", the Germans - "nakht". Okay, the author blunted and wrote a nonsense article based on Google materials, but so many Russian people did it ..
    Well, damn it, you give (s)
  24. +2
    29 February 2012 23: 52
    all these "parallels" (allegedly) of our hurray with different Turkisms are nothing more than typical false friends of translators.

    and then it’s more likely that the opposite is true. the Turks borrowed everything from us, but not us from them.
  25. Tiger
    0
    1 March 2012 23: 37
    Question; Why are there many Englishisms in modern Russian?
    Why are there many Germanisms in the Russian language in the 19th century?
    Why are there many French words in Russian in the 18th century?
    Answer; Because these countries at one time were and are setting the tone in everything.
    Question: Which state in 7-10 centuries on our territory set the tone in everything?
    Answer; Igarr claims that the Volga Bugaria, I also think so for a very long time,
    and therefore, since then, in the Russian language there are many Bulgarisms (Chuvashisms)
    to which URA refers, and this word is associated with the god TURA-URA RA.
    I would be grateful for counter questions and constructive criticism.
  26. vylvyn
    -1
    4 March 2012 10: 41
    And I agree with the statement that hurray could have come from imitating an animal roar. Of course it was a very, very long time ago. Earlier, warriors put on animal skins, claws, heads, why not use the animal roar in addition to this? It is quite logical. Yes, and frightening, shows that a person boils like an animal with rage, and animal rage is irrepressible and blind. In principle, such a fighter can be confused with a beast. Like in the movie "The 13th Warrior" there was a tribe of bears. And the Vikings, and the Indians, and the same Romans, all wanted to be like animals both in appearance and in voice. Or will no one be frightened by a viciously growling Rottweiler or Great Dane (I'm not talking about a wolf and a bear)? Most likely it came to us from Scandinavia, we had very strong ties before. And all this happened much earlier than our wars with the Turks and others. By the way, there are words that, if repeated without interruption in one line, then they sound the other way around. If we say for a long time to repeat RAURRAURAU ..., then in the end you will hear URAURAURA ..... Perhaps someone in ancient times had a war cry RAU, and ours heard URA and, on the sly, they piled on them. This is how URA defeated RAU.
  27. 0
    19 March 2012 13: 38
    I want to add a few words on this topic. Purely IMHO.
    Why do we often look for in such "sacred" words as, for example, "URA" (I think this is exactly the SACRED word), some kind of "material" roots and borrowings?
    I think it’s not just that “In the beginning there was a word”. There is a theory that it is sound vibrations that form the "matter" we know. In many ancient cultures and traditions, there are sacred words or sounds that do not carry any semantic load at all, but they themselves create certain emotional, mental and even energy potentials. And they are in no way connected (at least there is no serious data on this score) with any phonetic borrowings from historical, cultural or toponymic knowledge.
    I think our "URA" can be artificially tied to anything similar in sound, however, I think that in a situation when a person goes to a mortal enemy, sacred sounds are more appropriate, and not some semantic phrases. IMHO.
  28. 0
    29 January 2013 21: 14
    Now an Armenian will come in and write that 'Hurray' came from the word 'Urartu'. feel
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. 0
    18 February 2024 23: 54
    Nonsense about the Turks.
    German – hurra (hurray).
    Old German - hirra (hurray).
    Presumably, the German interjection hirra was formed from the verb hurren, meaning “to move quickly.” In Russian, “hurray” began to be widely used in the 18th century. , in the era of massive borrowings from the German language.
    Under Peter the Great, many things were adopted. Including drill.
  31. 0
    April 8 2024 17: 30
    Quote: sasha.28blaga
    Didn’t this “ur urus” come from the Mongol Khan - beat the Russian.
    Urus, translated from Turkic, means warlike, (Urus kiye) - dressed like an urus, kiye - dressed. Russians, this noun word comes from the Tatar phrase Urus kiye. In the Avar language, glurus is written in Avar because (gl) there is no such bu in other languages ​​and the pronunciation is very difficult and that’s why it’s easy to say Urus.
    In short, "Urus" is simply a "warrior".
    By the way, in 1377 Tamerlane began to fight against someone Urus Khan, Tamerlane entered. But Urus Khan died before the battles began.
  32. 0
    April 8 2024 17: 33
    Quote: predator
    Hurrah! this is the cry of the soldiers of Genghis Khan; in the 14th century, Russian soldiers began to use it.
    Apparently the British are also “Genghis Khan’s warriors.” Since the English battle cry is: "Hurrah" or (another option) "Hooray". hi