Ambassadors of the United States, Britain, China and France decided to reject the invitation of the Russian Foreign Ministry

36
The US ambassador to Russia refused to accept invitations to the Russian Foreign Ministry, which was also sent to other accredited diplomatic representatives. This is an invitation to participate in a meeting with experts representing the Department of Non-Proliferation and Arms Control. The main subject of the meeting: unfounded accusations of London against the Russian Federation in the poisoning of the spy Slippal and his daughter.

A spokesman for the US embassy, ​​M. Olson, said that the US ambassador to the Russian Foreign Ministry would not go.



Ambassadors of the United States, Britain, China and France decided to reject the invitation of the Russian Foreign Ministry


From her statement:
US Ambassador to the Russian Federation John Huntsman will not participate in the meeting at the Russian Foreign Ministry. The US Embassy is considering participating in this meeting at a working level.


Earlier that refuses to take part in a meeting with experts of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said the British ambassador. A similar statement was made by the French ambassador. At the same time, the French diplomatic mission stated that the diplomatic mission would still be represented - one of the envoys of lower rank. Exactly the same statement was made in the Chinese Embassy in Moscow.

"China will send a representative to the meeting. The ambassador will not go," as stressed in the diplomatic mission.

Thus, the meeting will be held without ambassadors of countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.

Recall that earlier the head of the Foreign Ministry of Britain in one of the interviews let out that London has samples of gas that Skripal and his daughter were poisoned with. If so, from where? And experts in the field of chemistry noted an important detail: in London they say that Skripali did not die, because they had time to inject an antidote - but if so, how did they know in Salisbury which antidote to inject into the poisoned?
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    36 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +16
      21 March 2018 15: 15
      The American ambassador to Russia refused to accept invitations from the Russian Foreign Ministry sent to other accredited diplomatic representatives.

      Why is this necessary, it’s not entirely clear, A strong country doesn’t need to make excuses! And to prove something to the Western ambassadors.
      1. +6
        21 March 2018 15: 19
        I agree why they organized this "briefing" - it’s not clear, there’s no one to explain in essence - and there’s no reason ... Who cares, he already understood everything for a long time, but it’s useless to just wind your nerves, they’ll even have ssy eyes all God's dew.
        Although on the other hand - we demonstrate openness, but they are afraid of the type))
        1. +9
          21 March 2018 16: 22
          Quote: maxim947
          I agree why this “briefing” was organized - it’s not clear, there is no one to explain in essence - and there’s no reason ...

          Now there is a live broadcast, at a briefing, representatives of more than 150 countries, which are chewed on a “spoon” (for dumb people) and where the representative of England has once again noted herself with everyone, is her impenetrable stupidity.
          Ours did everything right.
          1. +2
            28 March 2018 09: 25
            Correctly? Justified correctly? Is it right to prove your innocence after such a provocation? Yes, these ambassadors had to be sent already, and not invited to a briefing !!!!
      2. +5
        21 March 2018 15: 20
        the meeting will be held without ambassadors of countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.

        Definitely afraid to take something ... "Is the hat on the thief?"
      3. +5
        21 March 2018 15: 26
        Quote: Lesorub
        Why is this necessary, it’s not entirely clear

        These are the rules of the diplomatic service. A country accused of something is required to provide colleagues with the opportunity to communicate on the subject of the charge. Refusal to communicate means first of all a lack of interest in the topic of communication. In some ways they are right - everything is so clear!
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +12
        21 March 2018 16: 23
        Quote: Lesorub
        The American ambassador to Russia refused to accept invitations from the Russian Foreign Ministry sent to other accredited diplomatic representatives.

        Why is this necessary, it’s not entirely clear, A strong country doesn’t need to make excuses! And to prove something to the Western ambassadors.

        This meeting is not for excuses, but in order to publicly reprimand the shaving men and their ilk, reasonably and at the expert level.
        Silence or an apology is what they hoped to get arrogant Saxons from us. But figs to them - let them rage!
      6. 0
        21 March 2018 17: 18
        Well, it’s more like an invitation when you know that they’ll definitely not come to you.
        We invited you, they say, but you yourself refused.
      7. +4
        21 March 2018 17: 35
        I looked at the briefing: the position of the Russian Foreign Ministry looked weak. It would be advisable: 1. To require the establishment of the fact of the use of the OM and its qualification as a terrorist attack,
        2. Demand the establishment of the true perpetrators in order to prevent the like, dangerous for all states in the future.
        1. 0
          22 March 2018 05: 30
          Quote: Victor N
          It would be advisable: 1. To require the establishment of the fact of the use of the OM and its qualification as a terrorist attack,
          2. Demand the establishment of the true perpetrators in order to prevent the like, dangerous for all states in the future.

          somehow you looked strange, even if you showed excerpts in the news where ours directly demanded an investigation in accordance with the OPCW rules; they directly said that a terror act was committed against our citizens.
    2. +8
      21 March 2018 15: 18
      As it came down to it; so in the bushes ... there is nothing to say ...
      1. 0
        21 March 2018 15: 37
        Arrive, accused of collaborating with the Russians.
    3. 0
      21 March 2018 15: 20
      they told them to decline the invitation and they reject it, otherwise it’s not the business of the owner to argue
    4. 0
      21 March 2018 15: 24
      Call the summons! There was nothing to yell ...
      1. +1
        30 March 2018 19: 08
        Right! And bring a summons to everyone in the capital on the tank!
    5. +6
      21 March 2018 15: 27
      Not pleasantly surprised by the position of China.
      1. +4
        21 March 2018 15: 52
        Ambassador, not an errand boy! Why did you need to be invited to the briefing at the rank of ambassador?
      2. 0
        30 March 2018 19: 11
        There is nothing surprising with China. China's foreign policy is a monkey on a tree, watching two tigers fight below. When there is only one left, she will go down from the tree and finish off the remaining wounded and bloodless, having received everything for which they fought.
    6. 0
      21 March 2018 15: 31
      Jews say that we are weak, so we twirl them on one tidy
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. 0
      21 March 2018 15: 35
      Pigs + beads = 0
    9. 0
      21 March 2018 15: 52
      Quote: Valid Rapper
      Not pleasantly surprised by the position of China.

      To normal people this situation is up to the stars
    10. +3
      21 March 2018 15: 55
      The creaks did not die, since they managed to introduce an antidote

      The vague doubt that they were generally poisoned torments me. So, the play was played.
    11. +2
      21 March 2018 16: 05
      Quote: Valid Rapper
      Not pleasantly surprised by the position of China.

      Probably this Skripal is simply uninteresting to the Chinese ... The horseradish will die with it. And who destroyed him, what's the difference. Normal reaction, normal people.
    12. 0
      21 March 2018 16: 05
      The Security Council has long signed for its powerlessness. It's time to crush them with their own weapons! Planting Kompru about them in the media, and then let them slap back! Well, like, black princesses for a white prince!
    13. 0
      21 March 2018 16: 06
      They refused, because they would have nothing to cover for the arguments of Russia, and they did not want to sit blushing either. But all the same, they will pay for the collision, handsomely, so that it wouldn’t bark further on Russia. Everyone will be counted and everyone will be asked. angry
    14. 0
      21 March 2018 19: 33
      Why invite these? It is necessary to call the ambassador and hammered.
    15. +2
      21 March 2018 19: 38
      It was possible to collect all the ambassadors of countries to our Ministry of Foreign Affairs only in one case - to deliver a Note regarding the poisoning of two Russian citizens in the UK, to present a bill for moral and material damage. Expel all Britons from Russia, introduce a tax on all goods and services from Britain and raise gas and oil prices for Britain by 100%. All citizens of Russia must be obliged to leave this foggy island within 30 days. All those who refused to deprive of Russian citizenship and nationalize all property. Well, you can add another ban on flying over the territory of Russia of British civil aviation, and of any transport from the estate of the Queen. Sea, rail transit cargo, road. That's something like this ... Zhirinovsky send an ambassador to them. Suraikina deputy.
    16. 0
      21 March 2018 19: 42
      Well, with the United States, Britain and France, everything is clear! But then a bunch of people wrote that the PRC is almost our brother and finally an ally of Russia!
      1. 0
        22 March 2018 05: 39
        Of course, I could be wrong ... in my opinion, China was not represented by the ambassador for the reason that there were no ambassadors from other countries either. No more.
        1. 0
          22 March 2018 08: 35
          smile That is, how was it not? I invite, as far as I remember, not only the USA, China, Great Britain, France, but also other countries! Or other countries Ketayu already in general and not countries?
          1. 0
            23 March 2018 06: 53
            Or other countries Ketayu already in general and not countries?

            Like everyone else in essence, actually - hypocrisy is smaller and everything falls into place ... there were no heavyweights? Did not have! So China does not believe that the rest should be "spent time as an ambassador."
            1. 0
              23 March 2018 08: 53
              smile As I wrote, Ketai had his own priorities and he did not care about Russia. But here our power pours into our ears again a fairy tale about the Russian and the Chinaman friendships forever! Although, of course, it is more convenient to drive resources for the Power of Siberia and water from Lake Baikal, as well as forest, under this matter.
    17. 0
      22 March 2018 00: 22
      Why should the ambassadors wrinkle their "faces" in front of the arguments currently available not in their favor? They will “wrinkle” in the silence of their cabinets without witnesses, writing something to which there are no answers.
    18. 0
      29 March 2018 13: 54
      This will mean that the poisoners do not want to communicate and fully proves the involvement of Skripal poisoning.
    19. Sam
      0
      29 March 2018 16: 24
      And China is not a friend to us!
    20. 0
      30 March 2018 18: 56
      How did all this creak already. After all, it’s clear that guano is not ours. If only because no one “grunted”. It would be ours - and the Skripals would not survive, and the town, most likely, became extinct.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"