Military Review

In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria

72
The head of the State Duma Defense Committee, Vladimir Shamanov, considers it necessary to consider the possibility of closing the airspace of Syria for all foreign states that do not have permission to fly from Damascus.


In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria


To stop the insinuations around Syria, it is necessary to carefully study the proposal of Colonel-General Retired Ivashov to close the airspace over Syria for all foreign states, except those who are given permission by Syria
- quotes Shamanova RIA News.

According to him, such a measure could be a step that is not enough to establish peace in the long-suffering Syrian land.

Earlier, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Federation Council, Konstantin Kosachev, said that the actions of the United States and its partners in Syria could lead to a deterioration of the situation in this country, and therefore the Russian Federation may decide to expand the grouping of its troops.
Photos used:
http://116almet.ru/
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 20 March 2018 16: 47
    +57
    Here are all these dances to close the sky, open, partially cover the fed up ... guys, either get married, or don’t worry the mother-in-law and father-in-law. Kindergarten, by golly.
    1. Logall
      Logall 20 March 2018 16: 49
      +21
      If possible, then go for it!
      I think that this was not done because it was impossible. Syrian air defense was broken, and it was important for Russia to secure its group. But recently, after the liberation of territories from militants, air defense was restored. Apparently managed to recover in full so that it was possible. Otherwise, this topic would not have been raised ...
      1. Anti-Corr.
        Anti-Corr. 20 March 2018 17: 42
        +10
        Quote: Logall
        If possible, then go for it!

        It’s they who are bold for the internal user, I’m more than sure that coalition bullets will simply get worried (although there’s another word in my head), that it didn’t work very well there, when almost half of the SAR air defense was simply demolished. It seems that it’s all balabolstvo with a hangover, the victory was celebrated.
        1. Thrall
          Thrall 20 March 2018 18: 01
          +17
          No need to take it literally. This is a signal to former partners, brought by a completely worthy person, a military general, and a State Duma deputy.
          And the partners, meanwhile, are mutating smile
          1. Freelancer7
            Freelancer7 20 March 2018 23: 37
            +1
            Kindergarten ... is it anyway funny ?!
        2. Don
          Don 20 March 2018 18: 31
          +4
          Quote: Anti-Corr.
          It’s they who are bold for the internal user, I’m more than sure that coalition bullets will simply get worried (although there’s another word in my head), that it didn’t work very well there, when almost half of the SAR air defense was simply demolished. It seems that it’s all balabolstvo with a hangover, the victory was celebrated.

          Absolutely right. This will not completely protect against the American attacks of Syria, but serious forces and means will be needed. As long as ours act correctly, thoughtfully and carefully, although not without errors. The great war on the territory remote from the main bases is a direct path to military defeat. Conclusion: the speech of the deputy is populism.
      2. Flyer_64
        Flyer_64 20 March 2018 19: 01
        +3
        It's impossible. To close the sky in Syria, even the S-400 regiment is not enough. And air defense systems must also be covered from the basmachi. There was an episode deployed a detection station on a hill, guarding the entire platoon. The Basmachi rode up in wheelbarrows and shot the station from far away, the guards could not do anything. Turntables were called, but the Basmachi washed off earlier. So consider how many troops you need to enter Syria to address the proposals of the State Duma.
        1. Sevastiec
          Sevastiec 21 March 2018 09: 19
          0
          So the interception can be carried out by fighters and interceptors. This is impossible, for another reason: we will not go into direct conflict with the amers, just as they are with us.
    2. The black
      The black 20 March 2018 16: 50
      +12
      In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria

      Well, the decision seems to be correct. Only it should not be decided by our Duma, but by the Syrian Kurultai or the government ..... Yes, and before you take such a step, you need to understand - can we ensure it ...
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 16: 53
        +26
        Quote: Black
        In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria

        Well, the decision seems to be the right one. Only it should not be decided by our Duma, but by the Syrian Kurultai or the government .....

        Over Libya, the sky was covered not by the Libyan Kurultai, but by the American Congress. So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?
        1. The black
          The black 20 March 2018 16: 56
          +7
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?

          Because we are not the United States. ... Since we are there legitimately, we must act exclusively according to the law ..... smile
          1. Logall
            Logall 20 March 2018 17: 00
            +8
            Only our State Duma and follows. After all, our specialists will strike, in which case. And that means that all the consequences will fall on our shoulders ... Both our headquarters and our diplomats will inform about the closing of the sky over Syria, and about the possible consequences. And I think that the RF Armed Forces will protect the air defense systems.
          2. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 17: 01
            +15
            Quote: Black
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?

            Because we are not the United States. ... Since we are there legitimately, we must act exclusively according to the law ..... smile

            America, without realizing it, lives exclusively according to Muslim laws - it fears and respects only power. He takes any goodwill for weakness. So there is nothing to help them with this.
            And if our State Duma decides to close the skies over Syria, then, I think, for the Syrian Kurultai, the matter will not be stalled.
            1. The black
              The black 20 March 2018 17: 03
              +2
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              And if our State Duma decides to close the skies over Syria, then, I think, for the Syrian Kurultai, the matter will not be stalled.

              Well it is clear. But you need to act starting with kurultai ...
          3. tol100v
            tol100v 20 March 2018 17: 08
            +1
            Quote: Black
            Because we are not the United States. ... Since we are there legitimately, we must act exclusively according to the law .....

            According to our law! And bring down everything and everyone!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Serge Gorely
          Serge Gorely 20 March 2018 16: 59
          +1
          But no. The iPhone man, in the role of the president of the Russian Federation, signed the decision on Libya, the result - the decision of the UN Security Council. Now our "partners" naturally will not miss this decision
        4. Anti-Corr.
          Anti-Corr. 20 March 2018 17: 37
          +3
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Over Libya, the sky was covered not by the Libyan Kurultai, but by the American Congress. So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?

          Not quite so, they closed it by the decision of the UN Security Council, and our leaders did not veto it.
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 17: 52
            +12
            Quote: Anti-Corr.
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Over Libya, the sky was covered not by the Libyan Kurultai, but by the American Congress. So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?

            Not quite so, they closed it by the decision of the UN Security Council, and our leaders did not veto it.

            When the skakaly filled up the Boeing and dumped everything on us, among our sluggish excuses was such that they had to declare the sky over the area where the fighting was being conducted closed to flying. It is time.
            The government of ANY country has the right to demand the termination of flights in its sky from ANYONE. Including through the UN. The government of the country and only it decides who will fly in its sky and who will not. Today, with the permission of the Syrian government, only we fly there. This two.
            Assad’s decision as the legitimately elected president and the fact that there is a war going on is enough for us to fly in Syria. Assad no longer called anyone there. These are three.
            1. Anti-Corr.
              Anti-Corr. 20 March 2018 18: 04
              +5
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Assad’s decision as the legitimately elected president and the fact that there is a war going on is enough for us to fly in Syria. Assad no longer called anyone there. These are three.

              Yes, "Nata" wanted to spit on what Assad would say is four.
              And nobody will give ours to close the sky, neither Israel, nor the coalition. -it's five.
              And then you have correctly stated everything. hi
              1. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 18: 19
                +7
                Quote: Anti-Corr.
                And nobody will give ours to close the sky, neither Israel, nor the coalition. -it's five.

                Alex! And the “coalition” is the ultimate truth to decide who and where to fly? International law nevermind? Or can only the “coalition” know how and is allowed to spit? Start with drones, there is a field of uncultivated work. And then some kind of "accident" ... I assure you with knowledge of the question - in America, only generals do not remember Korea and Vietnam, because all their "combat experience" is bombs on Yugoslavia, Libya and Iraq. And to Congress and the Senate, not to mention Trump personally, oh how reluctant this is


                There will be no second Vietnam or Korea. They’ll shout about the aggressor Russia, pile up another smelly bunch of sanctions and that’s how it will end ...
                1. Anti-Corr.
                  Anti-Corr. 20 March 2018 18: 51
                  +4
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  They’ll shout about the aggressor Russia, pile up another smelly bunch of sanctions and that’s how it will end ...

                  Alexei! I understand you perfectly, but we are no longer living in the USSR, but we are thinking how then, because the mattresses do not need to fight with us, they will choke us economically, now we do not have technologies for extracting hard-to-recover oil reserves, which means in the foreseeable future In the future, mining will be reduced, the second moment, it can be said that there will be no SP-99,9 by 2%, the Turks, instead of the declared volume of 64 billion cubic meters, have now left only 31 billion, so they are now engaged in the utilization of the second string of UP, the shaves on Friday refused to import gas from the Russian Federation.
                  And where will we get money for the war, if we have nothing to export besides raw materials?
                  1. You Vlad
                    You Vlad 20 March 2018 19: 10
                    0
                    Quote: Anti-Corr.
                    And where will we get money for the war, if we have nothing to export besides raw materials?

                    Why do we need to feed this rotten west? wink
                  2. Zoldat_A
                    Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 20: 48
                    +9
                    Quote: Anti-Corr.
                    And where will we get money for the war, if we have nothing to export besides raw materials?

                    And where did they get it in 41? Or are you, Alex, also sure that you wouldn’t have defeated Hitler without the Lendlis of the USSR? Perhaps, not in May of 45, perhaps not 28 of millions would have settled - but the result, I assure you, would have been the same. The question then was that the price did not matter. And in 57, and in 61 where did they get the money?
                    That's the stump that from the end of the 70's they got used to live in export, and just as in the 90's our oligarchy has fixed this habit - and it's scary to think. But it’s worth reading K. Marx’s “Capital” - it becomes clear that money can be earned not only through trade (goods = money = goods + surplus value is an extensive way of economic development), but also by creating material values ​​(goods + labor = surplus value - intensive way). Work more, trade less - and the money will be ...
                    1. Anti-Corr.
                      Anti-Corr. 20 March 2018 21: 42
                      +4
                      Quote: Zoldat_A
                      And where did they get it in the 41st?

                      Alexei, with all due respect to you, I must say that in the 41st Commissars the loot did not poke abroad. And as for the Lend-Lease, I agree with you. But again, the RF is just a bit of the former USSR, and with another watered. labor system. and mob. resources. I believe that at first it is necessary to raise industry and the economy, and then play with the muscles in the world arena, and not defend the interests of big capital.
                      1. Zoldat_A
                        Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 22: 08
                        +9
                        Quote: Anti-Corr.
                        The Russian Federation is just a stub of the former USSR, and with another watered. labor system. and mob. resources.

                        You know, Alex, what's the trouble with all the conquerors who came to conquer us? That they incorrectly estimated our mobilization resource.
                        And personally, to you, Alex, in secret, I’ll open our Main Military Secret - we cannot fully assess our mobresource ourselves ... lol It seems there is no more strength - but they all come from somewhere ... It seems you can’t stand it - but we stand ....
            2. misti1973
              misti1973 21 March 2018 18: 48
              0
              Why is there such a certainty that the Boeing has flinched his hips? I'm so not so sure about that! Why would they keep the military air defense systems in the combat zone if the enemy has no aircraft?
              1. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A 21 March 2018 18: 56
                +5
                Quote: misti1973
                Why is there such a certainty that the Boeing has flinched his hips? I'm so not so sure about that! Why would they keep the military air defense systems in the combat zone if the enemy has no aircraft?

                And you didn’t notice how much that unfortunate Boeing resembles the plane of the President of the Russian Federation, which was just flying from somewhere at that time (I don’t remember where it came from)?
                And the provocation itself is good - even if you do not take the malicious intent in relation to the President of the Russian Federation. The wreckage did not reach the ground, but Russia "already brought down" it. The star-striped ears of the hosts of Ukraine - recognized masters of lies and provocation - are visible for several thousand kilometers ...
      2. Andrey K
        Andrey K 20 March 2018 16: 59
        +9
        Quote: Black
        ... Well, the decision seems to be the right one. Only it should not be decided by our Duma, but by the Syrian Kurultai or the government ..... And before you take such a step, you need to understand - can we ensure it ...

        The SAR government would like to, but does not have the technical ability.
        If they clearly indicate their requirements for uninvited guests, then I think ours will be able to provide a clear sky. There would be political will on this.
        Everything will rest on the capabilities of the Syrian Express, to saturate the ATS with the necessary equipment and its rapid deployment.
      3. KAV
        KAV 20 March 2018 17: 02
        +2
        Quote: Black
        Well, the decision seems to be the right one. Only it should not be decided by our Duma, but by the Syrian Kurultai or the government .....

        Well, our thought, including. For if Syria decides, and ours are in limbo, then nothing will work either.
      4. bazzbazz
        bazzbazz 20 March 2018 17: 14
        +1
        Unfortunately, no one will make such a decision, and if he does, then no one will fully implement it. But the NPCs will not shoot down anyone, this is, in principle, true. Otherwise, the war ...
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 20 March 2018 21: 10
        +1
        Quote: Black
        In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria

        Well, the decision seems to be correct. Only it should not be decided by our Duma, but by the Syrian Kurultai or the government ..... Yes, and before you take such a step, you need to understand - can we ensure it ...
        C'mon ..... This sentence for the most part sounded not so much for a real implementation, but for it to be heard by those who need it. Surely "TAM" is already discussing this topic with concern. The site for scoring was also chosen not weak - the State Duma after all. Not all the same, Putin can take it upon himself ... even if the Duma thinks when they never strain the "partners".
    3. smart ass
      smart ass 20 March 2018 17: 39
      0
      It’s necessary to close the sky. Before this, saturate and separate the air defense as much as possible
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Falcond
      Falcond 20 March 2018 20: 09
      +1
      Well, at least someone should voice loud populist slogans!
      Shamans, as a military man, of course, are right ... but politics is here .., and this is a slightly different matter!
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 20 March 2018 16: 49
    +1
    In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria
    But what about finding contacts with partners belay
    1. KAV
      KAV 20 March 2018 16: 54
      +2
      Quote: Observer2014
      But what about finding contacts with partners

      Apparently enough. Contacted at the most reluctant.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 20 March 2018 16: 56
        +2
        KAV (Alexander)
        Apparently enough. Contacted at the most reluctant.
        Tssssssss.Do not scare repeat
  3. Yrec
    Yrec 20 March 2018 16: 50
    +1
    They will not close anything. Otherwise, relations with the Turks will again deteriorate. With the rest, there’s nowhere else to go.
    1. KAV
      KAV 20 March 2018 16: 53
      +2
      Quote: Yrec
      They will not close anything. Otherwise, relations with the Turks will again deteriorate. With the rest, there’s nowhere else to go.

      And what will they do to us? They already did everything they could. They will not risk more.
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 16: 55
      +11
      Quote: Yrec
      They will not close anything. Otherwise, relations with the Turks will again deteriorate. With the rest, there’s nowhere else to go.

      But we already know how to restore relations with the Turks - tourists and tomatoes. And Erdogan understood everything about gas. So do not be offended.
      And on the rest - to drool with saliva ...
  4. Russia
    Russia 20 March 2018 16: 58
    +4
    They scare him like that, though without feedback, but the troops and equipment of the bourgeoisie are tightening and someday it will end.
  5. kaschey
    kaschey 20 March 2018 16: 58
    +2
    They thought for a long time.
    Too late. No.
  6. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 20 March 2018 17: 01
    +7
    One should learn about such things in fact from emergency news releases. Otherwise, it is nothing more than speculations on military-political issues. Ivashov suggested, Shamanov supported --- it remains to find out the opinion of our esteemed senators on this subject and to discuss with Solovyov)) ) GSh works differently, and in the circumstances it is a war in its purest form.
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 20 March 2018 17: 38
      +1
      Not a war, but an international crisis of the Suez crisis, the Six Day War, the Doomsday War, battles in the Bekaa Valley and other regular Middle Eastern crises, from which everyone suddenly lost the habit after 1991.
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 20 March 2018 17: 41
      0
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      and in the circumstances it is a war in its purest form.

      And in war, as in war .... First do, and then discuss!
  7. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 20 March 2018 17: 03
    +4
    This should be considered after Syria submitted a draft resolution to the UN General Assembly (it is useless in the Security Council) on the illegal presence of US units in Syria, as well as illegal violation of airspace and other aggressive acts such as shelling the air base with "axes", seizing territories and declaring part of Syrian airspace controlled by yourself.
    Then there will be the necessary background for the decision to close the airspace, since the risk of a direct clash between our airborne forces and mattresses is very high.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 20 March 2018 18: 48
      +2
      Yankees at the UN bustled around. There are so many "dogs hanging" on Assad !!!
      We must act, try again and again and seek support from different countries! It’s difficult of course, but not everyone is bought, afraid, and many have a tooth on the striped ones!
      In short - less empty talk, statements, the thing to do!
    2. misti1973
      misti1973 21 March 2018 18: 32
      0
      This project will be immediately blocked. And what's next?
  8. tchoni
    tchoni 20 March 2018 17: 26
    +1
    The tool is more than garne. The question is whether the strength is enough
  9. Radikal
    Radikal 20 March 2018 17: 28
    +2
    Quote: Black
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    So why not close the sky over Syria to our State Duma?

    Because we are not the United States. ... Since we are there legitimately, we must act exclusively according to the law ..... smile

    Syria has long been asking Russia for this ... sad In general, such things are being done simultaneously, in dynamics - they were proposed, discussed, decided, introduced! And if they pull it, they will "fix it", as it often happens with "them"! winked
  10. K-50
    K-50 20 March 2018 17: 32
    0
    it is necessary to consider the possibility of closing Syrian airspace for all foreign states that do not have permission to fly from Damascus.

    At the same time, Barmalean leaders will no longer be rescued, but as they are squeezed, the “wizards” arrive on green helicopters and take them out. I save them from retribution. sad angry
  11. Geonezis
    Geonezis 20 March 2018 17: 34
    +1
    Weakly believe that they can do it.
  12. Jack O'Neill
    Jack O'Neill 20 March 2018 17: 40
    +2
    And the sense to close the sky ATS, if we are not ready for decisive action? Technically, of course, we can accomplish such a task.
    An American or an Israeli will fly in and throw in ATS, then what? Will we hit Israel, USA? Shut up their planes?
  13. Fedorov
    Fedorov 20 March 2018 17: 43
    +2
    “The former chairman of the NATO military committee, German General Harald Kuyat, speaking on the German television channel ARD on October 9, 2016, expressed this idea very figuratively and categorically. He said:“ Americans are not able to close Syrian airspace. The only state that can close the Syrian airspace is Russia. Russia has absolute air superiority. If the Russians wanted, then even in Syria sparrows would be forced to walk ... "
    1. misti1973
      misti1973 21 March 2018 18: 30
      0
      It's all about the word "former"! They love to carry these nonsense.
  14. Strips
    Strips 20 March 2018 17: 49
    +3
    Fantasy and nothing more. Russia and Israel have an agreement, and as we see Russia does not intervene.
    As the Russian ambassador to Israel noted in his interview, Russia is fighting terrorists in Syria and there is no agreement on Syria’s help in the fight against Israel.

    Therefore, as Russia did not prevent Israel from pecking in Syria and those who help them, it will not interfere.

    The same goes for others. The USA will not give Russia such power in Syria, just like Russia will not give such a USA. But no one will give in completely - everything rests on a balance of interests and understanding.

    If Russia lands a US military plane, then there will be an answer that is also painful and will not lead to anything good, and obviously the USA will not leave after that, and the confrontation will only intensify.
  15. Penzyac
    Penzyac 20 March 2018 17: 59
    0
    Quote: Observer2014
    In the State Duma offered to close the airspace of Syria
    But what about finding contacts with partners belay

    Contacts are different, for example, sex "in a perverted form" ... negative
  16. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 20 March 2018 18: 17
    +1
    and we have the State Duma makes military decisions? is there a commander in chief, otherwise they will gather in three readings and debate with debate, did it happen with Georgia as well?
  17. andj61
    andj61 20 March 2018 18: 23
    +1
    Quote: Clever man
    It’s necessary to close the sky. Before this, saturate and separate the air defense as much as possible

    Is there a technical possibility for this? Now there are S-300 and S-400 air defense systems. Perhaps there is another three hundredth. And it is necessary to cover Syria at least two, preferably three dozen three hundred and four hundred with different missiles, plus the creation of a continuous permanent radar field, plus at least 7-8 dozen air defense fighters in constant combat readiness. Plus, the corresponding ground infrastructure and ground protection of the group with military air defense - from the Shell to Verb. In fact, it will turn out, if not the army, then the reinforced corps - that's for sure - with the appropriate amount of forces and means. Can we ensure this economically, logistically and militarily? If we can, then we can close the sky over Syria. For this, it is enough, as the comrades said, the decision of the President of Syria.
    Here is just such a solution - this is a test of Americans for lice. And this can lead to real clashes. And the Shamans, as well as Ivashov, to which the Shamanov refers, will not be shocked by the air. Perhaps this is a probe to test the reaction of the US leadership. But another option is also possible - we have become so strong that we are able to put such questions on a practical plane. I'd like to believe in it! hi
  18. dgonni
    dgonni 20 March 2018 18: 29
    +1
    Well, and who? AND WHAT AND FROM WHO? Will close the sky of Syria? Israel has bombed both the Hezbollah training ground and the Iranians will. mattress mattresses, if necessary, will again launch 60 tomahawks and roll everything into dust. And they will not abandon their allies, albeit temporary ones, in the territories where they are entrenched. If you close the sky, then it was necessary to close it back in 2015. But there were contracts with the same Americans. So it’s unrealistic, from the word vaabsche.
  19. Wolka
    Wolka 20 March 2018 18: 56
    0
    it had to be done 2 years ago ...
  20. Palagecha
    Palagecha 20 March 2018 19: 36
    +2
    Not diarrhea, so scrofula ... Then we won, then no ... now expressed concern, then close the sky ... then we bring out the equipment, then we build up ... then one thing, then another ... But you can’t immediately sit down and think ? Just not the place where they sit ...
    1. gukoyan
      gukoyan 21 March 2018 09: 32
      0
      Unfortunately, in our country everything is through the place where they sit.
  21. Falcond
    Falcond 20 March 2018 20: 13
    +1
    Close airspace, this means taking on the obligation to shoot down any aircraft that has invaded a restricted area! And, accordingly, responsibility too! And for this we need steel eggs !! To make loud statements you need a sip and a post!
  22. Shahno
    Shahno 20 March 2018 22: 12
    0
    Zoldat_A,
    Eh. Not so simple. And where was the resource in 90 e ....
  23. iouris
    iouris 20 March 2018 22: 20
    0
    You can offer anything, provide resources - is another matter. I wonder why this was attended to in the State Duma of the Russian Federation, and not the Assad administration?
  24. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 20 March 2018 22: 45
    +1
    Quote: Letun_64
    It's impossible. To close the sky in Syria, even the S-400 regiment is not enough. And air defense systems must also be covered from the basmachi. There was an episode deployed a detection station on a hill, guarding the entire platoon. The Basmachi rode up in wheelbarrows and shot the station from far away, the guards could not do anything. Turntables were called, but the Basmachi washed off earlier. So consider how many troops you need to enter Syria to address the proposals of the State Duma.


    Believe me, even just words will be enough. And the S-300-400 and fighters are just a serious appendage to the statement. There will be a direct order to be closed in one day even by the means that are there now
  25. Alexander War
    Alexander War 20 March 2018 23: 03
    0
    The State Duma proposed to close the airspace of Syria. It is possible to place several S-400 divisions in the region of Es Sukhna!
  26. Petio
    Petio 20 March 2018 23: 55
    +1
    Quote: Tol100v
    Quote: Black
    Because we are not the United States. ... Since we are there legitimately, we must act exclusively according to the law .....

    According to our law! And bring down everything and everyone!

    Before the first air defense strike, and he will follow immediately after the first firing
  27. gukoyan
    gukoyan 21 March 2018 09: 30
    0
    Yes, it would have been closed for a long time and not opened, what kind of kindergarten ...
  28. Ivanov IV
    Ivanov IV 21 March 2018 16: 07
    0
    In the State Duma they suggested, but in the General Staff the diapers ran to change .....
  29. misti1973
    misti1973 21 March 2018 18: 25
    0
    No, I'm crazy: Erdogan will support An Nusra and those groups that are commonly called the SSA, and there is talk of closing the airspace. This talk already got! What is the point of trashing people’s brains if you don’t sweep the United States anyway? They will easily erase both the base in Latakia and the port in Tartus into powder. Why should you use your forehead on the wall?
  30. Vladimir K.
    Vladimir K. 29 March 2018 19: 05
    +1
    It is high time! So far they don’t have any right to be there, but over time they can organize there (on the territory of Syria occupied by them) an autonomous state to recognize it themselves with all the consequences - such tricks have been done by "civilized gentlemen" before. Sooner or later, Russia will have to clash with the Americans in Syria, because they themselves will not leave there, while remaining they will continue to seek the overthrow of the legitimate authority in Damascus and the expulsion of our military from this region. It seems to me that it is better to make the fight earlier than to give them time to prepare and all kinds of provocations, which will certainly be. Moreover, we only need to make it clear the seriousness of our intentions and they will run away, tail-tailing - without guaranteed victory with little blood (better than someone else's), the Americans no longer know how to fight, and they didn’t know how to do it before.