Military Review

The first carriers of Avangard hypersonic blocks will be the UR-100N UTTH missiles

60
Soviet-made intercontinental ballistic missiles UR-100N UTTH (according to the US classification - SS-19 Stilet) will become the first carriers of hypersonic planning blocks of the newest Avangard complex, reports TASS, citing a source in the Russian defense industry complex


The first carriers of Avangard hypersonic blocks will be the UR-100N UTTH missiles


At the beginning of the 2000-s from Ukraine, the order of 30 UR-100N UTTH liquid missiles was supplied from Ukraine, after the collapse of the USSR, they were stored in warehouses in the open state - that is, practically new, capable of standing on combat duty for several decades. Some of these missiles will become the carriers of the first series of hypersonic planning warheads over the coming years. In the future, such units will be installed on a heavy rocket RS-28 "Sarmat"
- said the source

He also noted that the power of a nuclear warhead installed on a new hypersonic combat unit - “more than 2 megatons in TNT equivalent” - is quite enough for the complete destruction of “especially important targets”.

Earlier it was reported that the newest hypersonic strategic missile system "Avangard" will be adopted no later than 2019.
Photos used:
http://anyaero.com/
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 20 March 2018 12: 31
    +18
    That is, there is already a serial new method of counteraction and retaliation. But UR-100N UTTH is an old missile, and it turns out that the measure is temporary. But the fact that the Vanguard is in such a hurry to put on duty suggests that they will not hesitate either with the new carrier.
    1. Simargl
      Simargl 20 March 2018 12: 37
      +5
      Quote: NEXUS
      But UR-100N UTTH is an old rocket, and it turns out that the measure is temporary.
      It seems to me that because of this they want to be "disposed of" with benefit.
      Interestingly, the barmaley will be shot?
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 20 March 2018 12: 39
        +11
        Quote: Simargl
        It seems to me that because of this they want to be "disposed of" with benefit.

        I don’t think. The governor will be utilized by launching satellites according to the Dnepr program. And here they will put an old missile on alert ... this is clearly a temporary measure until the new carriers go into series.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 20 March 2018 12: 50
          +12
          A lot is not required from a rocket. Only bring the block to the desired height. Do not even break through the missile defense system. Therefore, if the missiles are in excellent condition, since they were not fueled, why not?
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 20 March 2018 12: 51
            +6
            Quote: Muvka
            Much is not required of a rocket. Only bring the block to the desired height. Do not even break through the missile defense system.

            Nothing that this rocket is liquid? Remind you how much it is on duty and what are the requirements for storing fuel for this rocket?
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 20 March 2018 12: 52
              +3
              The article also says that they are in an empty state with us.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 20 March 2018 12: 54
                +5
                Quote: Muvka
                The article also says that they are in an empty state with us.

                In the article they can write anything ... the point is to put Vanguard on an empty, non-refilled carrier then? What then can this carrier endure without fuel?
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka 20 March 2018 12: 58
                  +10
                  They put the block, load it into the mine and fill it up. What is the problem then? And there will be a practically fresh rocket. Or do you think that they will not be able to create / will not find fuel for the rocket that was made at Khrunichev? (To be honest, I did not understand how to write correctly)
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 01
                    +5
                    Quote: Muvka
                    And there will be a practically fresh rocket.

                    Will not be. Based on your logic, the same Voivode could be upgraded and poured fresh fuel before turning blue ... however, you got confused on the creation of Sarmat, spent the money, again the institutes worked, the industry too ... I repeat, these missiles have been around for decades they’ve already passed the deadlines. They set the governor, if sclerosis doesn’t fail me, with an expectation of 20 years (I can be slightly mistaken).
                    1. Muvka
                      Muvka 20 March 2018 13: 04
                      +4
                      Because the voivode is filled, and the fuel is very active. Therefore, it is impossible to use them further. Well, the means to overcome missile defense on the Voivode are already somewhat outdated.
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 09
                        +4
                        Quote: Muvka
                        Because the voivode is filled, and the fuel is very active.

                        Do these rockets fly on water?
                      2. antivirus
                        antivirus 20 March 2018 13: 44
                        +1
                        about overcoming - ROMANIANS AND POLES WERE NOT AFRAID..IM SHAKING FROM FEAR IS IMPOSSIBLE - WILL FALL OUT AND IN SMALL COUNTRIES IMMEDIATELY TO LIVE
                    2. Piramidon
                      Piramidon 20 March 2018 14: 52
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      the same Voivods could be upgraded and filled with fresh fuel until blue in the face ...

                      "Voivode" how many years are on alert? So "Stilettos" can stand as much. At least until the advent of the Sarmatians
                    3. Simargl
                      Simargl 20 March 2018 15: 10
                      +10
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Based on your logic, the same Voivode could upgrade and fill in fresh fuel before turning blue ...
                      This is your strange logic!
                      The missiles were on conservation, they have not seen fuel yet.
                      Yes, they will not be able to stand on duty for a full settlement period, but this is not required of them: they are required to provide experimental-combat operation, until the appearance of a serial missile.
                2. The comment was deleted.
            2. Non liberoid Russian
              Non liberoid Russian 20 March 2018 13: 25
              +9
              NEXUS,
              if it was stored in a non-refilled form at the warehouse, then after checking for fatigue, the hull and tanks will be installed in the mine, refuel, mount the avant-garde and put on combat duty ... it does not contain kerosene, but mixed chemistry, it will stand idle for a long time in an encapsulated state how many engineers will measure ... may extend
            3. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 20 March 2018 13: 52
              0
              Quote: NEXUS
              Nothing that this rocket is liquid? Remind you how much it is on duty and what are the requirements for storing fuel for this rocket?
              Reply Quote Complaint

              chainsaw, does not want to work on last year's fuel ...- fact. hi
        2. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 20 March 2018 13: 02
          +6
          Old but alive ..... yes
          Utkin launch vehicle is very ...... Payload weight - 8800 kg, Maximum range, km - 11000 + 16000, Very "lively" for the output of the shock block ......
          And the fact that they were in "canned food", but in a "dry" form ..... so nothing will become to them ......
          They will light at the start, we are not cutting the 404th good for scrap. hi
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 07
            +5
            Quote: Solomon Kane
            And the fact that they were in "canned food", but in a "dry" form ..... so nothing will become to them ......

            Oh ... filling, storage, and so on ... do you think that time does not affect them? At the same time, giptil is very poisonous muck and very unstable, and all these dances with refueling of old rockets, in which the body itself can be (walls) thinner than necessary, do not cause optimism.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 20 March 2018 13: 13
              +6
              You are really kidding me. MISSILES WERE STORED IN A WAREHOUSE - NOT FOR THE RIGHT BEFORE WE ARE! What could eat there?
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 17
                +4
                Quote: Muvka
                You are really kidding me. MISSILES WERE STORED IN A WAREHOUSE - NOT FOR THE RIGHT BEFORE WE ARE! What could eat there?

                Dear, I'm not scoffing ... ICBM is not an iron or even a toaster. Storage is a good thing, but I repeat, firstly there are certain standards that must be observed. Perhaps with these missiles everything is fine, but maybe not. How to check?
                1. Vkd dvk
                  Vkd dvk 20 March 2018 22: 02
                  0
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Quote: Muvka
                  You are really kidding me. MISSILES WERE STORED IN A WAREHOUSE - NOT FOR THE RIGHT BEFORE WE ARE! What could eat there?

                  Dear, I'm not scoffing ... ICBM is not an iron or even a toaster. Storage is a good thing, but I repeat, firstly there are certain standards that must be observed. Perhaps with these missiles everything is fine, but maybe not. How to check?

                  So we will not check with you? Or are we?
                  Then why panic? Tanks, pumps, turbines without the influence of aggressive muck are stored normally. It is possible with inert gas filling. Here, electronics, plastic, rubber ages almost the same as refueled and empty. That's what you need to root for. Do you still have memory blocks on ferrites? Here is a headache, if anything happens to them. Try to restore this miracle. And how to replace the firmware, because the initial coordinates of the Stylet is Ukraine?
              2. Kisso4kin
                Kisso4kin 20 March 2018 19: 32
                0
                And you do not understand ...
            2. Solomon Kane
              Solomon Kane 20 March 2018 13: 16
              +6
              So the article explicitly states:
              stored in warehouses in an empty state - that is, practically new
              , will they be?
              The "harness" with the "body kit" checked, tucked and go!
              Moreover, they are in the TPK .....
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 21
                +4
                Quote: Solomon Kane
                The "harness" with the "body kit" checked, tucked and go!
                Moreover, they are in the TPK .....

                I do not claim that the missiles are "defective" .. I say that they are old! The carrier for a new class of strategic weapons was not chosen for the first freshness. That is, clearly a temporary measure. Apparently they decided not to wait for Sarmat, but to bet on what is.
            3. Piramidon
              Piramidon 20 March 2018 14: 55
              +2
              Quote: NEXUS
              in which the body itself can be (wall) thinner than necessary

              And why should it be thinner? Are they riveted by eye without any calculations?
        3. Moore
          Moore 20 March 2018 15: 28
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS
          And then they put the old missile on alert

          They are already standing.
          Quote: NEXUS
          Remind you how much she is on duty and what are the fuel storage requirements for this rocket?

          From the time limit to the time limit stand themselves and do not buzz.
          In general, I think the journalist got a little confused and gave out an experienced shooting for preparing a statement on the database.
          Although if you think about it, Topol-M without significant alterations of ground equipment was thrown into the silos from the 35th. What is the point of occupying an ultra-protected mine with a monoblock missile in modern realities - HZ. Maybe they’ll return to them the 35th with the “Vanguard” - they will still stand. Titans-2 in the USA won how long they stood ...
      2. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 13: 41
        +6
        Quote: Simargl
        Quote: NEXUS
        But UR-100N UTTH is an old rocket, and it turns out that the measure is temporary.
        It seems to me that because of this they want to be "disposed of" with benefit.
        Interestingly, the barmaley will be shot?

        American experience? They used all the junk in Iraq. Although hitting the barmaleas with hypersound is, it seems to me, a little unreasonable. If only, again, in front of the "partners" show off - "but I have a cho!" ....
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 20 March 2018 13: 56
          +5
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          "but I have cho!" ....

          I’m more interested in - “they didn’t show” ... because if it’s such as Vanguard, they showed nuclear KR, why are we developing this, which is more secret than that?
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 14: 00
            +6
            Andrew, hi!
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            "but I have cho!" ....

            I’m more interested in - “they didn’t show” ... because if it’s such as Vanguard, they showed nuclear KR, why are we developing this, which is more secret than that?

            I think we can always find something to surprise our "partners" with .... Uncles, apparently, do not spit on the ceiling ... Years through 3-5, if America thinks up something like this, we will have them again pleasantly "please".
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 20 March 2018 14: 02
              +5
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              In 3-5 years, if America thinks up something similar, we will pleasantly “please” them again.

              Alex. hi
              A very true saying-the war is won by the TEACHER!
              1. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A 20 March 2018 14: 18
                +6
                Quote: NEXUS
                A very true saying-the war is won by the TEACHER!

                Well, with the introduction of the Bologna system and the Unified State Examination, it became tight with teachers, but the Soviet traditions still exist in the design bureau and when the "masters" come to the design bureau, they either do not take root there or are quickly impregnated with Soviet leaven.
                In my post-Army life, I began a civilian biography in an organization that worked closely with the military-industrial complex. On KB, which at the beginning of the 90's were still Soviet at 100%, I had seen enough. And it was precisely these Soviet orders that helped them survive to this day. I speak not from my words - two neighbors in the country are the same old stumps as I do - sometimes we recall the past for a “glass of tea” ... fellow
      3. midivan
        midivan 20 March 2018 21: 56
        +2
        Quote: Simargl
        Interestingly, the barmaley will be shot?

        belay
        He also noted that the power installed on the new hypersonic warhead nuclear warhead “More than 2 megatons of TNT” is enough to completely destroy “critical goals.”
        I hope you joked what
        1. Simargl
          Simargl 21 March 2018 01: 13
          +1
          Quote: midivan
          I hope you joked
          Are the mushrooms growing on the Kura during firing? You can throw a few tons of TNT.
          1. midivan
            midivan 21 March 2018 01: 41
            +2
            Quote: Simargl
            Are the mushrooms growing on the Kura during firing?

            Just the fact of use will raise such a howl, the earth will shake yes
            Quote: Simargl
            You can throw a few tons of TNT.

            Well, TNT can
            1. Simargl
              Simargl 21 March 2018 03: 54
              +1
              Quote: midivan
              Just the fact of use will raise such a howl, the earth will shake
              A week on Twitter to show how a rocket is prepared - they won’t even notice.
    2. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 20 March 2018 12: 38
      +4
      And I was always confused by the "sources" of the media commenting on classified information. If it’s just not in the interests of the Russian Defense Ministry?
      1. Oznob
        Oznob 20 March 2018 12: 49
        +1
        Of course in the interests. the analogy suggests itself. Weighing on the wall, never used for its intended purpose, the belt has a powerful educational effect on the growing shift.
      2. Solomon Kane
        Solomon Kane 20 March 2018 13: 11
        +2
        But the topic of sources has always been contradictory and not always objective .....
        It is not a fact that these LV data were already used to test the technical parameters of the unit and test launches ...
        They have already been used, but the topic has just "surfaced" .... request
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 20 March 2018 14: 59
        0
        Quote: rotmistr60
        And I was always confused by the "sources" of the media commenting on classified information. If it’s just not in the interests of the Russian Defense Ministry?

        And who gives these media outlets? Of course MO. And dosed, as much as necessary
  2. vaaaaadik
    vaaaaadik 20 March 2018 12: 32
    +3
    Nice to read such news
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 20 March 2018 12: 37
    0
    Source: UR-100N UTTH missiles will be the first carriers of Avangard hypersonic blocks
    Well, why not !? And it’s not so long ago at VO that some suffered because of the freezing of the Barguzin project bully laughing
    Do not consider it an insult. I just want to remind you that I am right then in this matter hi
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 20 March 2018 12: 53
      +6
      Quote: Observer2014
      Do not consider it an insult. I just want to remind you that I am right then in this matter

      Are you sure that the Barguzin project was frozen? wassat
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 20 March 2018 12: 55
        +3
        Quote: NEXUS
        Are you sure that the Barguzin project was frozen?

        Considering how MO "merged" the information about the "not particularly" successful launches of "Zircon", setting up a prototype "Barguzin" on the database will not cause much surprise ....
        laughing
  4. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 20 March 2018 12: 38
    0
    In the early 2000s, about 30 UR-100N UTTKh liquid rockets were delivered from Ukraine for "gas debts", after the collapse of the USSR, they were stored in warehouses in an empty state - that is, practically new ones that could stand on combat duty for several decades. Part of these missiles will become the carriers of the first series of hypersonic planning warheads

    Those. not even 30 Vanguards coming soon? It’s not thick .. Apparently something props up, since for the “Vanguard” they put the UR-100UTTKh as a temporary measure.
  5. Fedorov
    Fedorov 20 March 2018 12: 44
    +1
    Not my photo, but it's worth considering, it's just Poplar. Not even "M", but Sarmat missile defense does not even turn its tongue.

  6. Egorovich
    Egorovich 20 March 2018 12: 44
    0
    Good luck to fear aggressors !!! And there, “Sarmat” will not take long. good
  7. san4es
    san4es 20 March 2018 12: 45
    +1
    The images of Roscosmos show the launch of the UR-100N / RS-18 ICBM from the Baikonur Cosmodrome (October 22, 2008). soldier
    The performance characteristics of the rocket UR-100N UTTH
    Combat alert
    November 6 1979 city
    Number of steps 2 + breeding unit
    Liquid stored fuel
    Launcher type mine PU with gas-dynamic launch
    The number and power of warheads RGCH IN 6x750 ct
    Mass of the head / casting weight 4350 kg
    Maximum range 10000 km
    Autonomous inertial control system
    Accuracy 920 m
    Length 24.3 m (complete with container)
    Maximum diameter 2.5 m
    Starting weight 105.6 t
    Fuel mass 93.1 t
    Oxidant Nitrogen Tetraoxide
    UDMG fuel
    Thrust ДУ (sea level / vacuum) 1842/2038 kN (first stage)
  8. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 20 March 2018 12: 52
    +2
    When journalists pronounce the word “about 17 pieces,” I really want to give mathematicians (and the order of arithmetic) to their teachers. Journalists are not to blame, they were simply underestimated. They made higher educational institutions, invented specialties. Where can they go now, only in the tongue-tied "journalists" Zamastrahansk-TV "
  9. Muvka
    Muvka 20 March 2018 13: 10
    +4
    NEXUS,
    Are you kidding or slowing down? The voivode has been refueled for decades. And these missiles are dry.
  10. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 20 March 2018 13: 29
    +1
    Well .... as a temporary measure ..... the only question is: how temporary. BB "Vanguard" has a weight of 2 tons and "noticeable" dimensions. By the weight of the thrown cargo, the UR-100 "pulls" on the 2 of the Avangard block; but, given the dimensions of the “Vanguard”, most likely it will “take” the 1 block ... “Sarmat” can be “oriented” to the 4 blocks by the weight of the loaded combat load; but, most likely, the 3 battle blocks .... It is encouraging that we decided "complete" the active protection of mine launchers (Mozyr system) ...
  11. mark1
    mark1 20 March 2018 14: 08
    +2
    NEXUS,
    The missiles are stored in an unfilled condition, the tanks are filled with nitrogen under pressure, the missile is inspected before being installed in the mine, the tanks are refueled and oxidizing, are amplified and the rocket rolls out to a position and can stand on the DB for 15-25 years. The warhead is installed after installing the rocket in the mine.
  12. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 20 March 2018 14: 42
    +1
    In general, I think so far it is better not to spread our developers about the "Vanguard", otherwise the media will quickly blow all the secrecy ...
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 20 March 2018 14: 58
      0
      You can just say anything about them, because
      there will not be many more (and are unlikely to be at all).
      They are no better than conventional warheads of ICBMs: much more complicated in design
      and less accurate.
      1. Voyager
        Voyager 21 March 2018 10: 30
        0
        Sorry, but where will your data about be from, accuracy and so on?
  13. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 20 March 2018 14: 55
    0
    Which was required to confirm. Carriers for for these
    There are no planning warheads. Since they are much larger than usual
    warheads. Under them Sarmat can adapt when he will
    ready. And put on combat duty rusty missiles lying down
    in stock for 20 years? belay
    And the strategic arms reduction treaty will not give them
    to deliver. Even the voivode removed the combat units in order to free
    a place for new Yars without breaking the contract.
    So these Vanguards will not be another 10 years (not to mention that
    they’re generally the 5th wheel in an ICBM cart.)
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 20 March 2018 15: 24
      +6
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Even the voivode removed the combat units in order to free
      a place for new Yars without breaking the contract.
      So these Vanguards will not be another 10 years (not to mention that
      they’re generally the 5th wheel in an ICBM cart.)

      wassat wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing Don’t be afraid. You already ... Well, she’s like small children. This is not against you, but against international terrorism. laughing
    2. Vlad Petrov
      Vlad Petrov 20 March 2018 15: 30
      0
      Everything in the world is simple and affordable.
      Not knowing only your six is ​​a sin.
      It is criminal to deceive others.
      It’s ridiculous to deceive yourself.
  14. slipped
    slipped 20 March 2018 18: 01
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    And put on combat duty rusty missiles lying down
    in stock for 20 years? belay


    Herase statement.) But Nitsche, that the Rokot rocket flies and all 23 launches of the UR-100 UTTX, which is the first stage of this carrier, have been successful since 2000? You see, his rusty rockets.

    Not only that, they are going to Roar-2.
  15. Old26
    Old26 20 March 2018 18: 28
    0
    Quote: Simargl
    Interestingly, the barmaley will be shot?

    Yes, a competition has already been announced for filling the vacant pilot position in the head part exclusively for shooting at barmales. Hurry up. There are still vacant places for "pullers"

    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Muvka
    The article also says that they are in an empty state with us.

    In the article they can write anything ... the point is to put Vanguard on an empty, non-refilled carrier then? What then can this carrier endure without fuel?

    I'm afraid that out of the 20 that were returned in the early 2000s, several pieces remained of power. Where in this case they will be based is unknown. The only platform adapted for this is Object 310, singular in the PR of the 13th Division. Restructuring of the remaining "alive" mines from the UR-100N UTTX has not yet happened. "Purchases" are silent about it, like "fish on ice"

    Quote: Solomon Kane
    Utkin launch vehicle is very ...... Payload weight - 8800 kg, Maximum range, km - 11000 + 16000, Very "lively" for the output of the shock block ......

    For starters, there is no such thing as payload in the Strategic Missile Forces. There is an abandoned weight. Where everything goes from a warhead to a breeding stage, fuel reserves, means of overcoming missile defense, i.e. false goals. The real weight of warheads that can be taken, that is, what can be called at least remotely USEFUL LOAD, is something about 5 tons ...

    The maximum range is again depending on the load. With a monoblock and a throwing weight of 8,47 tons - really 16000. With an RGC and an air pollutant of 8,73 tons - 11000

    Quote: Muvka
    You are really kidding me. MISSILES WERE STORED IN A WAREHOUSE - NOT FOR THE RIGHT BEFORE WE ARE! What could eat there?

    Nothing. But electronics will most likely have to be "sorted out", as well as to check all the "rubber products" (membranes, etc.). Nobody canceled the aging of materials ...

    Quote: Moore
    Although if you think about it, Topol-M without significant alterations of ground equipment was thrown into the silos from the 35th.

    As far as I know, they reworked the mine. She even had a different index after the alteration - 15P735-65. In the Tatishchev’s division, just 60 of the 90 mines existing there were redone.

    Quote: Moore
    What is the point of occupying an ultra-protected mine with a monoblock missile in modern realities - HZ. Maybe they’ll return to them the 35th with the “Vanguard” - they will still stand.

    Maybe they will return it. but it is worth considering that the 35th with this block is 7 meters longer than the regular one. In the PR of the 13th division, the silos from the R-36M UTTH were redesigned for the experimental silos. And that one has more dimensions than the 35th

    Quote: Solomon Kane
    But the topic of sources has always been contradictory and not always objective .....
    It is not a fact that these LV data were already used to test the technical parameters of the unit and test launches ...
    They have already been used, but the topic has just "surfaced" .... request

    It is a possible option. Moreover, they transferred EMNIP a year and a half ago

    Quote: Piramidon
    And who gives these media outlets? Of course MO. And dosed, as much as necessary

    And sometimes frank linden. What is also necessary

    Quote: Fedorov
    Not my photo, but it's worth considering, it's just Poplar. Not even "M", but Sarmat missile defense does not even turn its tongue.

    "Poplar", clean, without the "M" has never been deployed in silos. It can only be Topol-M

    Quote: voyaka uh
    And the strategic arms reduction treaty will not give them
    to deliver. Even the voivode removed the combat units in order to free
    a place for new Yars without breaking the contract.

    No need to come up with about VOEVOD. A certain number of VOEVOD was actually removed from the database so as not to exceed the ceilings. But we have a reserve in terms of deployed systems. 501 units instead of 700. In contrast to the previous contract, the missile is considered not the number of warheads with which it passed the test, but the real amount. That is, for example, on some VOEVODOM it is possible to leave for example 6 BB, and on some -10, and on the third, for example 3. And so in relation to all existing weapons systems. The only weapon system where the number of warheads is clearly stated is heavy bombers. They have 1 plane, 1 charge. The maximum is limited for B-52 to 20 charges. But in the calculations we are talking about ONE CHARGE
  16. Old26
    Old26 20 March 2018 21: 40
    0
    Quote: slipped
    Herase statement.) But Nitsche, that the Rokot rocket flies and all 23 launches of the UR-100 UTTX, which is the first stage of this carrier, have been successful since 2000? You see, his rusty rockets.

    Since 2000, there have been 26 launches. One emergency and two partially successful. In total, since the start of operation, 2 unsuccessful and 2 partially successful. so there were emergency

    Quote: slipped
    Not only that, they are going to Roar-2.

    Oh really? Have you agreed with Petro Poroshenko?