Seoul: Kim Jong Un promised to stick to denuclearization

20
Kim Jong-un "gave the word" on the obligation regarding the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, reports TASS the message of the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of South Korea Kang Kyung Hwa.



His promise is very valuable, because this is the first time that words come from the North Korean supreme leader in person, this has never happened before,
said the minister on CBS.

In addition, Kyung Hwa called Donald Trump's agreement to negotiate with the DPRK "a very bold decision, demonstrating the intention to solve the problem once and for all."

North Korea has a very limited opportunity for economic interaction with the outside world, which means that the country has few opportunities to improve the quality of life of its people.
she noted.

According to the Foreign Minister, Kim Jong-un is currently considering a statement with which he will address the world community.

Recall that in early March it was reported that US President Donald Trump was ready to meet with Kim Jong-un before May 2018 of the year. At the same time, he will accept the offer to meet only if the North Korean leader takes concrete actions to curb his nuclear and missile developments.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    19 March 2018 08: 41
    Kim Jong-un "gave the word"
    And as the true master of his word, as he gave it, he will be taken back ... if the Americans don’t make concessions.
    1. +6
      19 March 2018 08: 51
      Quote: svp67
      take back ... if the Americans do not make concessions.

      Let Seoul conduct more exercises with the Americans. Then Eun is not only not denuclearizing (an interesting word ... I hope he wrote it correctly), but he is being nucleated ...
      Eun was denuclearized, denuclearized - he didn’t.
      1. +1
        19 March 2018 08: 55
        Eun is not a stupid leader. It will require certain conditions. Iran is ready for the Americans to withdraw from the nuclear deal. Who said that in a deal with the DPRK their behavior will change for the better? You can stay on course forever. How to build communism, for example.
        1. +2
          19 March 2018 10: 07
          Yes, North Korea does not have to have nuclear weapons, it is enough to have the right allies with nuclear weapons. Although, it is clear that the presence of nuclear weapons in the DPRK is not a problem at all, it is an occasion for the escalation of the conflict.
          There is such an interesting point that even if we assume the DPRK refuses nuclear weapons, a situation may arise as with Assad. It seems to have destroyed chemical weapons and claims are only growing. You should not rush into this.
    2. +4
      19 March 2018 08: 52
      In addition, Kyung Hwa called Donald Trump's agreement to negotiate with the DPRK "a very bold decision, demonstrating the intention to solve the problem once and for all."

      Letting this go to inter-Korean negotiations is tantamount to launching a goat in your garden and eating cabbage and eating the beds and trampling the fence. Yes
      1. +3
        19 March 2018 10: 17
        Quote: vlad66
        Letting this go to inter-Korean negotiations is tantamount to launching a goat in your garden and eating cabbage and eating the beds and trampling the fence.

        There are no "inter-Korean" talks at all. The situation is as follows: Eun made a proposal to Trump, met and discussed North Korean initiatives. The American president gave his permission to start a dialogue. That's all, the rest of the countries are not at all involved, you can see the pic Kim ends, so he caved in.
    3. +1
      19 March 2018 10: 46
      And if it doesn’t work out differently with the "jeltmen"? They also change the rules of the game on the fly.
    4. 0
      19 March 2018 12: 52
      Quote: svp67
      svp67


      Hello, Sergey.
      And on the part of the "exceptional" something is really going on like "what was it?". what

      IMHO - "in secret to the whole world." bully
      1. +1
        19 March 2018 13: 08
        Quote: Lelek
        Hello, Sergey.

        Good afternoon hi
        Quote: Lelek
        And on the part of the "exceptional" something is really going on like "what was it?"

        I like their talk about "old-fashioned" ... It turns out Eun needs to open his page on Twitter, to communicate "in a modern way" ... Comedians. By the way, Pompeo is not yet the Secretary of State ... until 01.04.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX ....
  2. +2
    19 March 2018 08: 42
    What kind of "denuclearization" is a Jew writing an article? put Kim on your nukles take care of Hawaii
  3. +6
    19 March 2018 08: 45
    Most likely, the great comrade Eun was misinterpreted / understood ... for the example of North Korea is the opposite ... as long as you possess nuclear weapons you will be blamed and blocked ... BUT as Libya and Gaddafi will not touch you ... too expensive ... In this regard, nuclear weapons guarantee the security of any country ...
    1. +4
      19 March 2018 08: 58
      Kim Jong-un is doing everything right. The teachings of Lao Tzu on tactics of warfare are eternal.
      It’s easy to understand what denuclearization of the Korean peninsula along Eun means, just get rid of the missiles by pulling them away laughing . tongue wassat
  4. +1
    19 March 2018 08: 57
    Recall that in early March it was reported that U.S. President Donald Trump was ready to meet with Kim Jong-un until May 2018. At the same time, he will accept the offer to meet only if the North Korean leader takes concrete actions to curtail his nuclear and missile developments..
    Kina will not. And we were led all on a trampo tweet a couple of weeks ago lol
    Observer2014 (Sergey) 11 March 2018 08: 46 | Trump does not exclude the conclusion with Kim Jong-un “the greatest deal for the world”
    Trump does not exclude the conclusion with Kim Jong-un of the "greatest deal for the world"
    In general, Trump should learn from Putin.! "Filter" every phrase. And then grinds loud statements. On the topic and no.
  5. +3
    19 March 2018 09: 16
    To promise does not mean to marry ... There Libya destroyed her WMD ... and where is she now ...
  6. +16
    19 March 2018 09: 38
    Well
    Something already
  7. +2
    19 March 2018 10: 28
    In this whole situation, already 10+ years there is only one country that does not keep its obligations. And this is not North Korea ..
    Everyone knows her, but they pretend strenuously that they don’t understand where her legs are growing from.
  8. +1
    19 March 2018 10: 43
    Kim jong un now ponders a statement, which will appeal to the world community
    This is probably what RK really wants. Kim Jong-un does not need to ponder the statements, because they are ready for him for all occasions. But Trump should consider his behavior (threats) in relation to the DPRK, and the South on participation in exercises with the main instigators.
  9. -1
    19 March 2018 13: 43
    But I’m wondering how some rhetoric will change if Eun and Trump really agree? Of course you can wave a nuclear club as you like, but you always want to eat !!! I think Eun is not ready to drive his people into the Stone Age.
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 19: 15
      Quote: Korax71
      But I’m wondering how some rhetoric will change if Eun and Trump really agree? Of course you can wave a nuclear club as you like, but you always want to eat !!! I think Eun is not ready to drive his people into the Stone Age.

      Therefore, they frighten Russia, but they are afraid to touch. Because everyone knows our position:
    2. 0
      19 March 2018 20: 58
      Bombed in the Stone Age for an hour if there is no nuclear club. Favorite phrase of 3,14ndos: "How can you not promise?"