Militants "Jaish Tahrir ash-Sham" shot down Su-24

103
According to Lenta.ru, citing the Directorate 4 channel-channel, which monitors the activities of terrorists, militants from the Jash Tahrir ash-Sham group (* banned in the Russian Federation) shot down a Su-24 plane belonging to the Syrian Air Force in the East Kalamun region . The moment of the fall hit the video.

Militants "Jaish Tahrir ash-Sham" shot down Su-24




According to Al-Masdar News, the plane crashed into territory controlled by Syrian government forces. In turn, the Syria Call News publication, citing sources, reported that the aircraft was shot down from a ground-based rocket launcher and fell near the cement factory. In this case, the pilot allegedly managed to eject, but there is no other information about him yet.

According to the portal Al-Masdar News, earlier the terrorists announced the resumption of the attack on the Syrian army in the area. No comments from the official Damascus on this incident have yet been received.

  • https://www.youtube.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    18 March 2018 20: 29
    Today is a holiday with our Western and Middle Eastern partners, as well as with non-brothers and other trash
    1. +7
      18 March 2018 20: 40
      Syria Call News, citing sources, reported that the aircraft was shot down from a ground-based rocket launcher and crashed near a cement factory.

      As noted by Al-Masdar News, the attack aircraft was shot down by anti-aircraft machine guns. https://news.rambler.ru/incidents/39388469/?utm_c
      ontent = rnews & utm_medium = read_more & utm_sou
      rce = copylink
      Let's hope for the best, but the domes are not visible on the video.
      1. NKT
        +4
        18 March 2018 20: 55
        A couple of times flashed information on the internet that was shot down by Wasp.
        1. +7
          18 March 2018 21: 10
          There are many versions, but the video does not show the characteristic “trace” of the rocket, as well as the parachute canopies.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. +13
            19 March 2018 05: 42
            Quote: Hanokem
            One less and it's nice

            Probably very nice always is at war, the roof and without it blows.
          2. +10
            19 March 2018 05: 47
            This is not the only good news for the Zionists (fascists), it is much more pleasant for you that the power of your partners from the Russian oligarchy over the fragment of Russia continues and therefore your lawlessness regarding the ATS continues.
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 11: 42
              Quote: zoolu350
              This is not the only good news for the Zionists.
              What is good for the Zionist is the death of the Arabs (Nazis).
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          4. +12
            19 March 2018 09: 30
            Oh, and I remember, here recently the 16-th failed. We also write that it was nice. Next time I’ll write, just that the flights so far are not “brave”. The answers were scared. But the Syrians are not afraid and fly And they are stronger, the truth is on their side, and not on yours. So do not, your comment is similar to the whining of a beaten dog. And scary to bite and want to yap.
          5. The comment was deleted.
          6. +2
            19 March 2018 11: 28
            Kasher. Are you confused ?! Your nome should not be there at all. You still answer for the Gollan.
            1. 0
              19 March 2018 20: 11
              How will we be responsible for the Golan? More from now on please
              1. +1
                19 March 2018 21: 34
                It will be a SUPRISE))) You will appreciate!
          7. +1
            19 March 2018 19: 41
            What is pleasant in fact? That the plane was shot down by terrorists or their accomplices? Are you not happy for your allies?
      2. +15
        18 March 2018 21: 20
        In the Western and our media, another topic is being promoted, also related to Syria.
        A whole conspiracy theological theory is being advanced regarding the downed HH-15.03 Pave Hawk helicopter of the Americans.
        It turns out that in addition to the helicopter pilots, its passengers were also pilots.
        And then we read:
        ... More detailed information appeared in large Western media, they said that according to preliminary data, 7 US troops were killed (according to some sources, we are talking about 9 dead).
        "A separate official told ABC News that there were seven people on board the helicopter. All were US Air Force pilots, ABC News confirms," ​​the ABC television channel said ...

        All this is linked to the fact that it was these pilots who attacked our guys on February 7 and 8 in the area of ​​the gas fields Hasham and At-Tabiya.
        1. +11
          18 March 2018 22: 53
          Not. This is not possible, if only because they attracted a bunch of diverse forces. Together, they cannot be shoved into one helicopter, except for awarding - but then he would have fallen somewhere at the base in El Udeid (Qatar).

          Most likely, the turntable was carrying the TACP squad (airborne pilots - belong to the US Air Force, well, or the U.S. KMP - if they direct KMP aviation) with a couple of cover. Then everything converges both logically and numerically. It was Koniko’s good TACP work that served as the foundation for success in that battle, which the general noted separately.
      3. +3
        18 March 2018 22: 38
        Quote: kapitan92
        As noted by Al-Masdar News, the attack aircraft was shot down by anti-aircraft machine guns.

        It’s they who so bring the Barmalean “curators” out of suspicion. The plane crashed into the territory controlled by Assad's troops, so we'll find out soon.
      4. 0
        19 March 2018 11: 47
        Quote: kapitan92
        As noted by Al-Masdar News, the attack aircraft was shot down by anti-aircraft machine guns.
        Of course, when did the Arabs lie?
    2. +3
      18 March 2018 20: 42
      Well, honestly, I didn’t see how much I got into a plane. It seems to me that there was surging, if it is of course possible on these engines. One word Arabs, on a heavy bomber from low altitude NURSami shoot. What bombs in Syria are over or light aircraft?
      1. +5
        18 March 2018 21: 08
        Quote: RASKAT
        Well, honestly, I didn’t see how much I got into a plane. It seems to me that there was surging, if it is of course possible on these engines.

        There, the sandstorm season is about to begin. And then, at what altitude the attack aircraft flew. I would like to hope that the pilot is alive and already at the base. hi
      2. +10
        18 March 2018 21: 39
        Quote: RASKAT
        shoot on a heavy bomber from low altitude with NURSs. What bombs in Syria are over or light aircraft?

        Correction - SU-24 front-line bomber, not heavy, was once considered a fighter-bomber. Very, very much he has from the F-117 (this is a separate topic, dig in the trash by the name of the Internet, if desired). With the advent of SVP-24, he received a second life. Damn effective machine was in combat use. Will serve more.
        1. +8
          18 March 2018 22: 06
          correction - not f-117, but f-111
          1. +4
            18 March 2018 22: 26
            Quote: novel xnumx
            correction - not f-117, but f-111

            Guilty, corrected, old, forgotten, the cache is buggy after a hard choice of the President laughing drinks .
          2. +6
            18 March 2018 23: 38
            with F-111 Sukhoi is related only to its general purpose, but the progenitor of Su-24 (T-6-2 product) is structurally the experienced English TSR-2, thanks to the constructive chip: flat milled panels
            In the photo the product T-6-1 and TSR-2
            Take-off engines were removed on the T-6-2 and a swept wing with variable sweep was used
            1. +7
              19 March 2018 01: 09
              Filxnumx

              What are you carrying)))
              Or maybe just before the TSR-2 and T-6 and was the serial Su-15 ?!
        2. +4
          18 March 2018 22: 20
          Quote: iliitch
          Correction - SU-24 front-line bomber, not heavy, was once considered a fighter-bomber

          No, the Su-24 was never considered a fighter-bomber, a pure front-line bomber.
          1. 0
            18 March 2018 22: 44
            Quote: figvam
            No, the Su-24 was never considered a fighter-bomber, a pure front-line bomber.

            It was originally considered. Although this, of course, pouting cheeks, nothing more. Any bomber can be considered a fighter. All that moves and does not move.
        3. +2
          18 March 2018 22: 33
          Quote: iliitch
          Damn effective machine was in combat use. Will serve more.

          Good, but voracious - "mother do not grieve."
        4. +2
          19 March 2018 00: 49
          Quote: iliitch
          Very, very much he has from F-117 (this is a separate topic, dig in the trash by the name of the Internet, if desired)

          What is it ?????? In general, he has a lot from Su-15, and if you can not distinguish f-117 from f-11, then maybe you should not argue who has very much?
          1. +3
            19 March 2018 02: 00
            Quote: tomket
            if you cannot distinguish f-117 from f-11

            Well, it’s good to kick. Yes, I mistakenly set 7 instead of 1. Shoot the heart out now, damn it.
            This is from inattention, and not from ignorance.
            1. +1
              19 March 2018 08: 36
              from the floor. what a sophistication! type PM is not enough? lol
        5. 0
          19 March 2018 13: 29
          Quote: iliitch
          he has a lot from F-117 (

          from 111. 117 invisible
      3. +4
        18 March 2018 23: 02
        Quote: RASKAT
        It seems to me that there was surging, if it is of course possible on these engines.

        Surge is possible on any engine. But to shoot down the plane with an anti-aircraft machine gun - somehow doubts torment me ... It is theoretically possible, but with very favorable conditions for the shooter (minimum speed and height from 100 to 300 m at least).
      4. 0
        19 March 2018 11: 44
        Quote: RASKAT
        I didn’t see any hit on the plane
        There was an explosion on board the plane. And why and why is not yet clear.
    3. +6
      18 March 2018 21: 03
      Quote: Dormidont
      Today is a holiday with our Western and Middle Eastern partners, as well as with non-brothers and other trash

      When these donkeys yell about Alla in the bar, I really, really want to pick up a dagger to kill their creators. Tear out the viper teeth, drown the fleets. How many do they have there, seven?
    4. +1
      18 March 2018 21: 19
      Quote: Dormidont
      Today is a holiday with our Western and Middle Eastern partners, as well as with non-brothers and other trash

      Still, if this were not so, then
      "Lenta.ru"
      would be silent in a rag ... still that "Trojan horse"
    5. 0
      19 March 2018 00: 40
      How many Russian planes must be shot down so that at least they put at least a fake pro on our planes.
    6. +2
      19 March 2018 05: 44
      Today is also a holiday among adherents of the KhPP and the slaves of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation. And the Su-24 is only a sign of what will happen next.
  2. +6
    18 March 2018 20: 31
    If above their own, then there is a hope that the pilots are alive
  3. +17
    18 March 2018 20: 33
    ... the plane crashed into territory controlled by Syrian government forces ...

    The most important thing is that the pilot remains alive. The Syrian Air Force is worth its weight in gold.
    Iron, this is iron.
    1. +6
      18 March 2018 20: 43
      But there are few pilots. Airplanes of the Russian Federation will still throw ...
      If you do not cut delivery routes, this is not the last incident.
      1. +9
        18 March 2018 20: 59
        Quote: Logall
        ... But there are few pilots. Airplanes of the Russian Federation will still throw ...

        Somehow at leisure I read analytics on the SAR Air Force. It’s hard for them.
        The technique is a special conversation, a museum with a certain number of dissimilar specimens, which during the seventh year of the massacre were simply echoed.
        With the pilots in general, a blockage - it was described that they pulled out people who had long since retired.
    2. +3
      18 March 2018 20: 48
      The video quality is poor, but in silhouette it seems to me that this is a Su-22m4 (Su-17m4).
      1. 0
        18 March 2018 21: 29
        Or is it even MIG?
        1. +2
          18 March 2018 22: 05
          Quote: zivXP
          Or is it even MIG?

          No, definitely not Mig ...
      2. +9
        18 March 2018 21: 59
        figwam

        Do not make out in the photo ...
        Yes, and rummaged in the internet, there is also no clarity ...
        But in the morning all the news about 24 ...
        Let's see later ...
    3. +3
      18 March 2018 20: 56
      Andrey K (Andrey Evgenievich)
      The most important thing is that the pilot remains alive. The Syrian Air Force is worth its weight in gold.
      Iron, this is iron.
      And don’t tell Eugenevich. That is, that is. There will be a frame hunger. There is no joke against Syria. The whole "civilized world" is his mother am
      1. +7
        18 March 2018 21: 04
        Quote: Observer2014
        ... And don’t tell Eugenevich. That is, that is. There will be frame hunger ...

        Good evening Sergey hi
        Surely cadets of Syrian descent appeared in our flight schools, otherwise it will lead to a collapse.
    4. +15
      18 March 2018 21: 21
      Andrey K

      There are two in the carriage ... if it's su 24 ..
      And indeed, the moment of the hit is not quite visible on the video or how it was shot down ...
      Here is the further development of the emergency situation, right up to the destruction of the aircraft in the air ,,,
      They pulled to the last, to their own ... And the guys did not have time to eject ...
      Condolences, sorry for the guys ...
      1. +6
        18 March 2018 21: 24
        Quote: NN52
        ... there are two in the carriage ...

        Thanks for clarifying hi
    5. +2
      18 March 2018 21: 48
      Quote: Andrey K
      The most important thing is that the pilot remains alive.

      Two people there, a pilot and an operator of weapons.
      1. +13
        18 March 2018 21: 56
        iliitchitch

        I’ll clarify ..
        Pilot and navigator-pilot ... and not an operator of weapons ..
        1. +2
          18 March 2018 22: 25
          Quote: NN52
          iliitchitch

          I’ll clarify ..
          Pilot and navigator-pilot ... and not an operator of weapons ..

          More precisely, the pilot (KVS) and the navigator.
          1. +10
            18 March 2018 22: 37
            No.
            The posts sound exactly as I wrote ...
            FAC among citizens ...
            1. +2
              18 March 2018 23: 08
              Quote: NN52
              Posts sound exactly as I wrote

              More precisely, the crew commander and navigator ...
            2. 0
              19 March 2018 21: 21
              Quote: NN52
              No.
              The posts sound exactly as I wrote ...
              FAC among citizens ...

              Therefore, I wrote the PIC in brackets for citizens. And the right clean navigator. Is not it?
        2. +4
          19 March 2018 02: 55
          Quote: NN52
          weapons operator ..

          This is from the evil one, more precisely with the F-14, there was an armaments controller, aka WSO - weapon system officer
          1. +1
            19 March 2018 08: 41
            SU-30 is also double. in vain?
          2. +1
            19 March 2018 10: 32
            Quote: Pete Mitchell
            This is from the evil one, more precisely with the F-14, there was an armaments controller, aka WSO - weapon system officer

            There the line of weapons is very long, so the weapon operator is also the term appropriate.
            1. +5
              19 March 2018 10: 48
              Quote: novel xnumx
              SU-30 is also double. in vain?

              Quote: iliitch
              There the line of weapons is very long, so the weapon operator is also the term appropriate.

              Good morning, in the videoconferencing another designation of posts, therefore, I agree with Half a hundred second
      2. +6
        18 March 2018 22: 02
        Quote: iliitch
        ... Two people there, a pilot and an operator of weapons ...

        Already penetrated. I wrote about the pilot, as I have the custom of double-checking information.
        On the website of Interfax the following was written about the incident:
        ... According to CCA, pilot The plane ejected. ABOUT his fate is unknown. In addition, it is noted that the plane was shot down by representatives of a group that calls itself "Kalamun Rebels" ...
    6. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    18 March 2018 20: 33
    Yes, it’s very disappointing, the Syrian air fleet has greatly decreased during the war, I wonder how many combat aircraft remained there? let's hope that the pilot survived and was saved
  5. +4
    18 March 2018 20: 34
    They should be helped by airplanes, they still have brave pilots
    1. +6
      18 March 2018 20: 44
      Of course they will help and we know who. It’s only necessary to fight more professionally ourselves, this applies not only to the Syrian Air Force, but also to infantry, reconnaissance, etc.
      1. +9
        18 March 2018 20: 53
        I think the Syrians have been allotted a place in our flight schools, the conveyor is running, now the main thing is to pick them up. hi
    2. +3
      19 March 2018 00: 07
      you can podshamanit and transfer those planes that are under decommissioning. This is what they do with their younger brothers. And it is right.
  6. +4
    18 March 2018 20: 38
    It seems to me alone that the emotions of the Barmaleikins really resemble Sumerian races?
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 00: 06
      these are the sons of deserts ...
  7. +2
    18 March 2018 20: 39
    And what brought down something? No coalition humanitarian aid leaked.
    1. +3
      18 March 2018 20: 55
      Quote: Siberia55
      And what brought down something?

      Quote from the news
      In turn, the Syria Call News publication, citing sources, reported that the aircraft was shot down from a ground-based missile installation
      Have you read? The stump is clear that it’s not from a slingshot donated by a scout from Florida, the son of Muslim moonlighting as a bearded man
  8. +4
    18 March 2018 20: 59
    Something recently at the barmaley successes are suspicious. It is not otherwise the Saudis tossed up or “friends” from Qatar.
    1. 0
      18 March 2018 21: 10
      Quote: konstantin68
      Something recently at the barmaley successes are suspicious. It is not otherwise the Saudis tossed up or “friends” from Qatar.

      Throw a little, more important to teach how to use the "tool".
      I hope that the next day, there the earth will burn.
      To make the operator’s joy premature.
  9. +3
    18 March 2018 21: 05
    Well, the Arabic language is weak and weak.
  10. 0
    18 March 2018 21: 08
    Landing there would be landed, as in Serbia, but to clean up thoroughly. All the gangs will surrender right away. Kama profitable this tyagomotina? Perhaps to test new technology.
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 00: 04
      Nehru. We cannot be greater Syrians than the Syrians themselves
    2. 0
      19 March 2018 00: 52
      Who is bothering? Go clean up.
    3. 0
      19 March 2018 00: 55
      Are you still in school, are you our dynamite?
  11. 0
    18 March 2018 21: 11
    Dumb monkeys scream so much the microphone can’t stand it. I hope this is not our plane and where the fucking heat traps.
  12. 0
    18 March 2018 21: 42
    How long ?! We "defeated ISIS"! (Prohibited in the Russian Federation).
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 00: 02
      look at the operational map of Syria 2015 and 2018.
  13. +1
    18 March 2018 21: 43
    So I didn’t understand something: they shot down su 25 or su24? Post a stormtrooper? Why a pilot, not pilots?
    1. +1
      18 March 2018 22: 22
      Because the Su-22
  14. 0
    18 March 2018 22: 38
    Quote: NN52
    iliitchitch

    I’ll clarify ..
    Pilot and navigator-pilot ... and not an operator of weapons ..

    More precisely, the pilot and navigator.
  15. 0
    18 March 2018 23: 06
    I understand that to use the Su-24 against Islamic Islamist gangs ... It’s the same as hammering nails with a microscope.
    That is .... not from a good life. But "not from a good life," and the result is often not good.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 00: 01
      Nevertheless, it was the Su-24 and Su-25 that repeatedly turned the situation in favor of the SAA, and this cannot be denied.
  16. +2
    18 March 2018 23: 47
    The Syrian war showed that it is time to send the Su-24 and Su-25 to a landfill. These aircraft can’t work efficiently from high altitudes, and at small ones they become easy prey for anti-aircraft guns and MANPADS. If the armored Su-25 still has a chance of landing in case of severe damage, then the paper Su-24 has very few chances, and accident statistics do not speak in its favor.
    The concept of manned drums has become obsolete; now drones dominate the battlefield. All the leading world powers already have serial or pre-production models of heavy strike UAVs, so Russia is categorically not lagged behind.
    1. 0
      18 March 2018 23: 59
      1. It is impossible to seize control over a manned aircraft or disconnect)) 2. New sights and new electronic warfare like “Vitebsk” will save the situation.
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 00: 49
        1. It is almost impossible to intercept UAV control, given the complex encryption methods of the control signal. It is only possible to drown out the control signal and GPS itself, but then the drone will simply return to base. The most advanced models of shock drones can attack targets on their own, and the operator serves only to confirm them. Nothing prevents the drone from working independently for those purposes whose signatures are in its database.
        2. EW will not help in any way against ZU-23, DShK and MANPADS with laser guidance, and new sights will not allow unguided FABs and NURSs to hit small moving targets - the dispersion of these ammunition is too large.
        1. 0
          20 March 2018 14: 15
          1. But the Iranians seized control of the US drone)). I do not argue that drones do not need to be developed, I am saying that a drone cannot completely replace a person. So the Americans put in operation conserved "warthogs"

          2. There is no reception against the snouts (armor), but there are already anti-thermal and laser-guided MANPADS. The fight against moving targets, however, requires special missiles, but this does not apply to the dispute between drones and attack aircraft
    2. +3
      19 March 2018 00: 52
      Quote: krasnyiy.partizan
      The Syrian war showed that it is time to send Su-24 and Su-25 to a landfill.

      And it's time to send you for treatment.
      Quote: krasnyiy.partizan
      These aircraft can’t work efficiently from high altitudes, and at small ones they become easy prey for anti-aircraft guns and MANPADS

      With horseradish? Give the statistics of losses, by the number of sorties, then blather.
      Quote: krasnyiy.partizan
      All the leading world powers already have serial or pre-production models of heavy strike UAVs, so Russia is categorically not lagged behind.

      Expert
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 05: 56
        -What "statistics" should I check ..? -Where are the real results of all the bombing ..?
        - There are only some numerous unconfirmed "reports" about the killed ISIS ringleaders .., about the destroyed bases and warehouses with weapons, etc. ... -But, ISIS shows an endless number of these ringleaders ... -and in bulk weapons ( MANPADS, etc.) ... and "other equipment" ... -one time they shoot down military planes so easily and at the same time they remove and "lay out" all this for review ...
    3. 0
      19 March 2018 05: 57
      You should be sent to a landfill, and not well-deserved combat aircraft designed and built in the USSR. This is a war, and if the enemy has something more serious than a memory and MANPADS, then planes and helicopters will fall in dozens. And when they begin to use the UBC, then the bill will go to millions, and what not to fight because of this?
  17. 0
    18 March 2018 23: 57
    American partners have become generous with stingers
  18. +1
    19 March 2018 00: 07
    Hold on, Syria, we are with you!
    1. +1
      19 March 2018 00: 50
      Do you want to go there? Patriot.
      1. 0
        19 March 2018 12: 18
        If the Motherland sends)) In general, I would be more useful in the post-war civil administration, taking into account the experience.
  19. 0
    19 March 2018 00: 25
    how so We have already defeated everyone.
  20. 0
    19 March 2018 00: 55
    Quote: Fil743
    with F-111 Sukhoi is related only to its general purpose, but the progenitor of Su-24 (T-6-2 product) is structurally the experienced English TSR-2, thanks to the constructive chip: flat milled panels
    In the photo the product T-6-1 and TSR-2
    Take-off engines were removed on the T-6-2 and a swept wing with variable sweep was used

    This is the same as saying that the prototype of La-9 was the P-51 Mustang, simply because there was a laminar profile wing both there and there.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 01: 31
      Su-24 completely repeats the concept of F-111, because created as an answer to the Americans. The answer was not very successful, given the number of crashes "drying" during testing and operation. Amerikos, by the way, also had a reputation as a rather unreliable and difficult machine to drive. My words are confirmed by the fact that more in Russia and the USA did not create front-line bombers and attack aircraft.
      What we have at the output:
      F-111 - decommissioned back in 1998;
      A-10 - will be written off in the early 20's;
      Mig-27 - decommissioned in the 90s;
      Su-24M - will be decommissioned in the early 20's, giving way to the Su-34.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    19 March 2018 02: 00
    Quote: krasnyiy.partizan
    It is only possible to drown out the control signal and GPS itself, but then the drone will simply return to base.

    and what base will he return to without gps?
  22. 0
    19 March 2018 02: 18
    how tired of this agbar that he’s stuck in them
  23. 0
    19 March 2018 06: 18
    Quote: Hanokem
    One less and it's nice

    I propose to put Syria Mig 31 and a dagger. It will be even more pleasant. Bomb, start massively selling them to all your friends in Israel.
    1. 0
      19 March 2018 09: 04
      MiG-31 is a fighter-interceptor, or rather an aviation interception complex, who will he drive in Syria?
      Quote: demos1111
      Quote: Hanokem
      One less and it's nice

      I propose to put Syria Mig 31 and a dagger. It will be even more pleasant. Bomb, start massively selling them to all your friends in Israel.
  24. 0
    19 March 2018 08: 21
    Vidio is simply profanity, not their work, they just play a performance-kalamun, and this means Israeli air defense is not far away; Well, let’s say the Syrians will shoot down Israeli planes and the Jews, both ours and Syrian, then the log-out flights will be stopped from both sides, which means that by any means Israel is left without an air force and this is in the hands of Hezbollah
  25. +2
    19 March 2018 09: 54
    Sorry, some strange feelings arise when in the video the crowd begins to chant the “morbid phrase”. There is an approximate picture:

    And after that - silence ... belay I guess I'm a sadist ... crying
  26. +2
    19 March 2018 10: 25
    It's a pity the car, pilots are doubly sorry. Let's hope that the crew still managed to eject.
    There is a war, cruel and boundless.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"