Military Review

General Staff of the Russian Federation: the United States is preparing to strike on Syria

279
The Russian General Staff said that there are signs that the United States is preparing to strike at Syria.


We note the presence of signs of preparation for possible shocks.
- said on Saturday the head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Federation, Colonel-General Sergey Rudskoy.

General Staff of the Russian Federation: the United States is preparing to strike on Syria


In the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea, in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, shock groups of sea carriers of cruise missiles were created.
- declared the general.

The question arises: who are the United States going to support with these blows - the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists (a group banned in the Russian Federation) and their accomplices, who are outraged in Eastern Guta?
- added Rudskoy.

He also said that the United States could strike at state targets and Syrian troops, accusing them of using chemical weapons.

These provocations should serve as a pretext for the United States and its allies to launch strikes against military and government targets in Syria.
- noted the Colonel-General.

We also reliably know that in the area of ​​the city of Al-Tanfa, American instructors prepared several militant groups for conducting provocations using chemical weapons. weapons
- he said.

Rudskoy noted that toxic substances under the guise of humanitarian convoys of a number of non-governmental organizations have already been delivered to the south of Syria.

According to Washington, Damascus continues to use chemical weapons against civilians, in 2018, it was used at least seven times, the Washington Post specified.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
279 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. igor1981
    igor1981 17 March 2018 16: 49
    +44
    The only answer is to bring down missiles and their carriers ...
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 17 March 2018 16: 51
      +38
      It smelled of gunpowder. And not just a smell, but it stank.
      1. Logall
        Logall 17 March 2018 16: 56
        +15
        On this occasion, the President of the Russian Federation and uttered a text about new models of nuclear weapons. Like: knock down and do not hesitate.
        Americans are either superfluous missile carriers, or doubt that an answer will really follow.
        Pysy: S-400 can shoot down ships if necessary ... But I think that without them there is something ...
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 17 March 2018 17: 03
          +19
          The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles ... But you still can't retreat. Otherwise, they cannot be stopped. hi
          1. Logall
            Logall 17 March 2018 17: 10
            +26
            So the warning from our general was not only about missiles, but also about their carriers! Ships, ships, cars (if any).
            1. Viktor.12.71
              Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 22
              +17
              Quote: Logall
              So the warning from our general was not only about missiles, but also about their carriers! Ships, ships, cars (if any).

              You forgot to add the words of the general that the answer will be ONLY when you strike the RF Armed Forces in the SAR. As if the curvature of the Earth again did not hinder.
              1. Logall
                Logall 17 March 2018 17: 29
                +28
                So it is not known where the rocket launched toward the ATS flies. Is there ours or not ... Need to shoot down!
                1. INVESTOR
                  INVESTOR 18 March 2018 12: 41
                  0
                  I will not surrender Assad, even if the fighting will go on the streets of Moscow! I believe....
              2. vorobey
                vorobey 17 March 2018 17: 29
                +4
                Quote: Viktor.12.71
                Quote: Logall
                So the warning from our general was not only about missiles, but also about their carriers! Ships, ships, cars (if any).

                You forgot to add the words of the general that the answer will be ONLY when you strike the RF Armed Forces in the SAR. As if the curvature of the Earth again did not hinder.


                Why do you need details ... the main thing is to shout ..
                1. Logall
                  Logall 17 March 2018 17: 32
                  +12
                  The moderator decided to troll - go nuts! I answered above about the details ... I thought people who were literate would understand without explanation.
                  Quote: Logall
                  So it is not known where the rocket launched toward the ATS flies. Is there ours or not ... Need to shoot down!

                  And the curvature: S-400 sees beyond the horizon.
                  1. vorobey
                    vorobey 17 March 2018 17: 41
                    +10
                    Quote: Logall
                    I thought people who were literate would understand without explanation.


                    emoticons must be set ... not to joke .. war is on the verge of .. laughing
                    1. Logall
                      Logall 17 March 2018 17: 56
                      +2
                      And this is all that can answer, on this topic, the moderator of the resource we respect? Reporters are getting smaller ...
                      1. vorobey
                        vorobey 17 March 2018 18: 00
                        +4
                        Quote: Logall
                        And this is all that can answer, on this topic, the moderator of the resource we respect? Reporters are getting smaller ...


                        1. read below on the topic .. laughing
                        2. I'm not a journalist .. sorry. hi
                    2. figwam
                      figwam 17 March 2018 18: 01
                      +2
                      In addition to the United States, Britain and France can take part in this strike, of course, the number is on their side. Theoretically, the "Dagger" can get all the launch areas of the Tomahawks, and we may have submarines there.
                      1. Andrey K
                        Andrey K 17 March 2018 18: 19
                        +10
                        Quote: figvam
                        ... In addition to the United States, Britain and France can take part in this strike, of course, the number is on their side. Theoretically, the "Dagger" can get all the launch areas of the Tomahawks, and we can have submarines there ...

                        I read on the branch. We fight, we argue - mattresses will hit or not, we will compress or not. Compare TTX, who will strike than what. And somehow another participant in the Syrian epic, our ally on the land of Iran, passes by the topic.
                        Rudskoy:
                        ... in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea, in The gulf and the Red Sea created strike groups of marine carriers of cruise missiles ...

                        I have such a suspicion that the Iranians will quietly close the Persian Gulf with glanders, they have the strength and means to do this. Al-Quds of the Iranian IRGC, have not gone anywhere from Syria yes
                      2. Anti-Corr.
                        Anti-Corr. 17 March 2018 18: 20
                        +3
                        Quote: figvam
                        Theoretically, the "Dagger" can get all the launch areas of the Tomahawks,

                        Do we have so many carriers and the products themselves?
                      3. DMB_95
                        DMB_95 17 March 2018 19: 05
                        +6
                        Quote: figvam
                        In addition to the United States, Britain and France can take part in this strike, of course, the number is on their side ..

                        In this case, it is no longer important if the enemy has a quantitative or any other advantage. It is necessary to respond to the attack, and respond harshly, without even thinking about the consequences. As if this is the only and last chance to hit.
                      4. Lelek
                        Lelek 17 March 2018 23: 01
                        +3
                        Quote: figvam
                        figwam

                        hi
                        Now there is a lull in V. Guta - civilians are leaving and this is extremely worrying for the Americans, because there remain their "sons of bitches" and PMCs.
                    3. Boa kaa
                      Boa kaa 17 March 2018 20: 40
                      +10
                      Quote: vorobey
                      no laughing matter .. war is on the verge .. laughing
                      Dear, we all rely on the Yankees mind ... But, if the "Ax" of the war is obtained, then it will be harder for us than during the Second World War: the strength of the weapon and its combat capabilities have increased many times. Then one thing remains: to take more “lovers of shit democracy” with you beyond the horizon, so to speak ... But it will be crazy. Moreover, in this situation the big uncles will not even listen to all howling wimps (such as "Western democracies")! Everyone will have to pay the Hamburg bill - both right and wrong ... negative
                      1. Lelek
                        Lelek 17 March 2018 23: 34
                        +4
                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        Dear, we all rely on the Yankees mind ..

                        hi
                        Mind the Yankees? And what is it? It is useless to address the mind with a brush on all the fields of the globe. It is useless to turn to the minds of a global corrupt official who bribes governments of countries, introduces “sanctions” to bypass the UN on countries that disagree with the US line of behavior, which frightens the whole world with horror stories about rogue states that it has personally appointed. And do you rely on this "mind"?
              3. flicker
                flicker 17 March 2018 20: 00
                +3
                General’s words that the answer will be ONLY when hitting the RF Armed Forces in the SAR
                Especially TIME or just inattentive?
                1. Bad_santa
                  Bad_santa 17 March 2018 22: 27
                  +3
                  Most likely a bluff. If that the United States can destroy Russia without using any weapons. Our investments in their securities and interest payments will simply be frozen. And we will remember the 90s as paradise. The Americans have already made such a feint with Iraq, with Yugoslavia, and with Libya. You just need a good reason for this. Let's say attacks on Ukraine. I don’t think that in return we will hit with nuclear weapons
                  1. Tersky
                    Tersky 17 March 2018 23: 19
                    +10
                    Quote: Bad_Santa
                    Our investments in their securities and interest payments will simply be frozen. And 90-s will be remembered as paradise. The Americans have already made such a feint with Iraq, with Yugoslavia, and with Libya.

                    Such an expression as the gold and foreign exchange reserve of the Russian Federation heard? So, as of March 9, it is 455,2 billion, Doesn’t it mean anything? Not.. No. ?
                    Quote: Bad_Santa
                    If the US can destroy Russia without using any weapons
                    Wrecker will not fall off? With such a decadent mood, you should hang on the funeral home’s website, “patriotic” you are ours, laughing
                    1. Bad_santa
                      Bad_santa 17 March 2018 23: 34
                      +4
                      In gold there is only 1/3 stored, another 1/3 in the United States and the remainder of the NATO countries and in Russia. I voiced just one of the scenarios of extreme actions before the war itself
                      1. Tersky
                        Tersky 17 March 2018 23: 44
                        +8
                        Quote: Bad_Santa
                        In gold there is only 1 / 3 stored

                        Yes really belay , About 70% of Russia's gold is concentrated in the metropolitan metropolis, namely, in the premises of the Central Bank of Russia vault. The rest is located in inter-regional storage facilities located in St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg. For January, 2018 of the year, the RF RF makes up - 1838,8 tons. As for securities and debt securities, God forbid the war, they will become a paper at the moment .. You’ll be reminded of how we paid the United States for land lending, hi
                  2. DMB_95
                    DMB_95 18 March 2018 11: 32
                    0
                    Quote: Bad_Santa
                    If the United States can destroy Russia without using any weapons ............. We just need a good reason for this. I don’t think that in return we will hit with nuclear weapons

                    Then why are they armed with such a huge number of different weapons and a large modern army? Now they also announced the creation of the Space Forces. At the same time, no one threatens the States beyond the oceans, except for Kim Jong-un laughing Of the real threats, Russia, China and Aliens remain
                  3. sib.ataman
                    sib.ataman 18 March 2018 11: 45
                    +1
                    Bad_Santa, I'm going to make you privates! And we will ruin their world monetary system by translating the sale of energy carriers into rubles (if GDP and Co. have enough for the spirit!)! In vain, have they been saving up for all these years?
            2. weksha50
              weksha50 17 March 2018 18: 17
              +11
              Quote: Logall
              So the warning from our general was not only about missiles, but also about their carriers! Ships, ships, cars (if any).


              This is a war ... It’s just THE very same - THIRD WORLD and, probably, the last (extreme) ...
              1. Anti-Corr.
                Anti-Corr. 17 March 2018 18: 22
                +2
                Quote: weksha50
                This is a war ... Just SHE is the most -

                Perhaps also from two sides, Kakliya also announced a military operation, and they have 90 thousand troops near Donbass. bayonets. (in any case, the parashka said so).
              2. dauria
                dauria 17 March 2018 18: 43
                +6
                This is a war ... SHE IS THE very - THIRD WORLD


                Ammunition suspended, bombers sealed by special officers, crews in the barracks? Such things are usually preceded by a degree of combat readiness "military danger" or complete. I'm already getting old on my couch, not up to date. But they don’t start a war from a bay. First, the enemy will begin training - and right away we are. Since we are going to vote, it is too early to “write”. crying
                1. Boa kaa
                  Boa kaa 17 March 2018 21: 33
                  +9
                  Quote: dauria
                  This is a war ... SHE IS THE very - THIRD WORLD


                  Ammunition suspended, bombers sealed by special officers, crews in the barracks? Such things are usually preceded by a degree of combat readiness "military danger" or complete. I'm already getting old on my couch, not up to date. But they don’t start a war from a bay. First, the enemy will begin training - and right away we are. Since we are going to vote, it is too early to “write”. crying

                  1. Once you are old on the couch, you must remember the order in which the forces and troops are brought to the highest levels of the BG by the administrative order. This is to get ahead of the adversary in the deployment of forces ... But today you can start a war with DB forces ... and quite effectively.
                  2. 22.06.1941 years, people also slept peacefully, planned Sunday events ... So, this is not a fact.
                2. zaxis450
                  zaxis450 18 March 2018 14: 20
                  0
                  I agree! —For starters, let North Korea try to defeat with its 3.5 warheads and a dozen carriers! (They can’t even do this).
              3. iliitchitch
                iliitchitch 17 March 2018 19: 40
                +6
                Quote: weksha50
                This is a war ... It’s just THE very same - THIRD WORLD and, probably, the last (extreme) ...

                I went for a beer ...
                1. dauria
                  dauria 17 March 2018 19: 48
                  +20
                  I went for a beer ...


                  At the same time, take a loan to Sberbank ... Anyway, you won’t have to give it back laughing If they give, there will be no war, you won’t spend these guys ....
                  1. iliitchitch
                    iliitchitch 17 March 2018 20: 39
                    +2
                    dauria (Alexey) Today, 19:48 ↑
                    I went for a beer ...
                    At the same time, take a loan to Sberbank ... Anyway, you won’t have to give it back. If they give it, there will be no war, you won’t spend these guys .... [/ quote]
                    Oh well, it's kind of boring. With this beer it is better to look into the next entrance. To a woman who is pleasant in every way wassat drinks .
                    1. dauria
                      dauria 17 March 2018 21: 01
                      +18
                      I'd better look into the next entrance. To the woman


                      Spouse finds out - the third world garbage will seem wassat
                    2. Boa kaa
                      Boa kaa 17 March 2018 21: 36
                      +10
                      Quote: iliitch
                      With this beer it is better to look into the next entrance. To a woman who is pleasant in every way

                      Shit !!! Who is the lady, "pleasant in every way," goes with BEER (!) ??? With flowers, champagne and cognac !!!
                      Hussars, damn it, the elderly !!! laughing
                      1. iliitchitch
                        iliitchitch 18 March 2018 00: 29
                        +2
                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        Hussars, damn it, the elderly !!!

                        laughing The lady respects the beer. Who dares the lady’s desire not to fulfill ???
                        And what are the elderly hussars? What are the hussars then. Packing with pivas in the morning will not hurt, because champagne and konjac are pre-packed. The main thing is without fanaticism. hi drinks .
          2. ancestors from Don
            ancestors from Don 17 March 2018 17: 11
            +11
            Quote: Alex777
            The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles ... But you still can't retreat. Otherwise, they cannot be stopped. hi

            it is said to destroy carriers, it doesn’t matter how many “axes” were on board.
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 17 March 2018 17: 25
              +14
              Semen Semenych!
              How many carriers and how will you destroy at ranges from 1500 to 2500 km (depending on version)? There are no fools at all. The only question is whether they will risk it or not. Israel carried out all its missile defense exercises just like that? And the AUG and the amphibious assault formation with 3000 marines came up. We don’t have so much strength there. If the dagger does not count. But who knows how many of them and how many crews are trained to use? There are many questions. More than answers. hi
              1. Viktor.12.71
                Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 40
                +9
                Quote: Alex777
                How many carriers and how will you destroy at ranges from 1500 to 2500 km (depending on version)?

                Add dozens of the largest US bases in the Middle East, too, so the picture will become even sadder. Nothing to answer! Here the hedgehog is clear!
                PS Right now, they will start shouting about nuclear weapons and its immediate use across the USA and NATO. Remember once and for all, nuclear weapons are a deterrence weapon.
                1. DMB_95
                  DMB_95 17 March 2018 19: 32
                  +8
                  Quote: Viktor.12.71
                  Quote: Alex777
                  How many carriers and how will you destroy at ranges from 1500 to 2500 km (depending on version)?

                  Add dozens of the largest US bases in the Middle East, too, so the picture will become even sadder. Nothing to answer! Here the hedgehog is clear!

                  The fighting against the United States and NATO is a special and fundamental case. It is necessary to beat in response, and it does not matter - who has more missiles, carriers, bases and personnel. We can get the dokuda there and beat. As much as we can or in time. If we do not respond with a blow to a blow, then how do you justify yourself and look into your eyes.
                  1. SCHWERIN
                    SCHWERIN 17 March 2018 22: 19
                    +3
                    Hit Houston. There one rocket is enough for half of America. Chemical terminals with cool chemistry in tanks along the entire river.
              2. SRC P-15
                SRC P-15 17 March 2018 17: 42
                +20
                Quote: Alex777
                We don’t have so much strength there.

                How many forces we have in Syria and what, I think, are known only in the General Staff. And if they dared to warn the United States, then not everything is as bad as you say.
                1. Viktor.12.71
                  Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 56
                  +3
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  How many forces we have in Syria and what, I think, are known only in the General Staff.

                  In Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Oman, Qatar. In total, these bases are approximately 77 US troops, these are the bases of the Air Force, Air Defense, Navy, and in Qatar there is one of the largest US armored vehicles bases in the Middle East, and the U.S. Air Force command post is also located there. Recently, 000 US marines arrived in the Mediterranean. We exclude nuclear weapons, since Israel has it and launching in that direction will lead to an immediate response.
                  1. SRC P-15
                    SRC P-15 17 March 2018 18: 25
                    +1
                    Quote: Viktor.12.71
                    . We exclude nuclear weapons, since Israel has it and launching in that direction will lead to an immediate response.

                    And you do not allow the idea that the United States has nuclear weapons? Here they are just they most likely will take advantage. Of course, not against us, but they will open the Pandora’s box.
                  2. Maz
                    Maz 20 March 2018 21: 28
                    0
                    Well, Israel will sit and not rock the boat until the winner rolls out. These are accustomed to raking fire with the wrong hands. and ride on the safe corpses of enemies, seeking profit. tuta everything is fine.
                2. Alex777
                  Alex777 17 March 2018 17: 57
                  +2
                  The Varangian also did not give up. And I, like you, hope for the best.
                  I answered the desire of a colleague to drown Tomahawks carriers. Do you want this too?
                  I do not like hat-hopping because it diminishes the significance of victory. hi
                  1. SRC P-15
                    SRC P-15 17 March 2018 18: 06
                    +7
                    Quote: Alex777
                    The Varangian also did not give up. And I, like you, hope for the best.
                    I do not like hat-hopping because it belittles the price of victory.

                    Well, dust your head with ash, too, is not worth it. You do not take into account the work of our diplomacy. And the fact that work in this direction is going on, says that the United States still has not put its threat into action. So something stops them.
                    1. Alex777
                      Alex777 17 March 2018 19: 31
                      0
                      For example: have not prepared yet and is everything going according to plan? hi
          3. vicvladol
            vicvladol 17 March 2018 17: 32
            +6
            Not every tomahawk needs a missile defense. There is also EW.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 17 March 2018 19: 28
              +4
              Yesterday there was news that under Damascus the Mi-8 with the Lever was spotted.
            2. flicker
              flicker 17 March 2018 20: 06
              +1
              There is also EW
              Here, and axes will fall on Jordan or Israel. request Well, can the dome somehow save the latter, but the former? what
              1. Grigory_78
                Grigory_78 18 March 2018 05: 18
                0
                "Once upon a time there was a girl ... It’s my own fault!" (c) folk art
          4. askme
            askme 17 March 2018 18: 30
            +7
            This is the number in the entire fleet. All over the world. At the same time, in the theater of operations in Syria, the use of the entire US fleet is an impossible event. Maximum 1000. And there are rockets and carriers have something to shoot down / sink.
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 17 March 2018 19: 37
              +6
              Yes, that’s understandable. But do we have at least 600 anti-aircraft missiles in Syria? Considering how much the last time still flew. Then 2 destroyers set. What is stopping now will put 8 and a pair of Ohio on which 154 rockets? Aviation, both marine and land, and invisible, and B-52.
              Well, as one colleague rightly remarked, they have bases in the region from all sides. And we are in the middle. And Israel is against us, unfortunately.
              God forbid that everything will cost ... hi
              1. DMB_95
                DMB_95 17 March 2018 20: 14
                +18
                You have brought a lot of different arguments about the superiority of the United States and its allies, at least in the Middle East theater. But this should not be taken into account at all if, as a result of their attack, the citizens of Russia officially staying there will suffer. You will either need to answer or forget that we are a Superpower and, in general, a country to be reckoned with.
                1. Mengad
                  Mengad 17 March 2018 22: 32
                  +1
                  The Russian Federation will bluff, well, the citizens of Russia will suffer. Politicians will sit at the negotiating table and that’s it. Here and the whole answer will be. Or do you think that nuclear weapons will be used? You are naive winked Although if it will be applied yao .. then it does not matter anymore. laughing Not so inadequate people are sitting there ... they know what will happen and what they can answer and what not ...
                  1. askme
                    askme 18 March 2018 10: 02
                    +1
                    Well, dream up, dream up. This is all that remains for you ....)
              2. askme
                askme 17 March 2018 20: 17
                +9
                Russia in Syria has at least several thousand air defense missiles for any. Including S-400, Shell. Now they don’t have eight destroyers there, only if you count with the Persian Gulf, then yes. But while they will fly from there, the Su-30, Su-35 will bring them down many times. And the B-52 does not carry axes. This is a sea rocket at this time. The Air Force is armed with axes now - no. Out of 600, if 100 fly, they are lucky. Yes, another 90 will bring down the object defense. Ten will fly. This is not a conversation. But our Moreman will easily sink Ohio, while they will let 154 axes. The same with the rest of the destroyers and so on.
                1. Xnumx vis
                  Xnumx vis 17 March 2018 21: 47
                  +3
                  Now near Syria, our naval group is big! Big enough and formidable. Six boats, two new admiral frigates. Twenty pennants in the Mediterranean Sea.
              3. Maz
                Maz 20 March 2018 21: 32
                0
                Israel is never against anyone. God forbid! Passover on the nose. He is in the middle but on the side, the Schaub did not accidentally arrive on the face, and sells weapons, ammunition, food, clothes ... and buys, he has become cheaper. That and we warned him soundly. They are still choking.
          5. Blackbeard
            Blackbeard 17 March 2018 19: 04
            +3
            well, at once they won’t release as much as they like
          6. dorz
            dorz 17 March 2018 19: 36
            0
            Quote: Alex777
            The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles ... But you still can't retreat. Otherwise, they cannot be stopped. hi

            And the new American military doctrine on the use of nuclear weapons was imprisoned just under Syria.
          7. INTER
            INTER 17 March 2018 21: 18
            +12
            Quote: Alex777
            The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles ... But you still can't retreat. Otherwise, they cannot be stopped.

            From far away they can be randomized. But I would like to recall the grandson of Saddam Hussein


            He was 14 years old and fought for 6 hours with 400 foot soldiers and killed 14 military Yankees.
          8. Dead duck
            Dead duck 17 March 2018 21: 29
            +3
            Quote: Alex777
            The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles

            Well, they’re not fools to run everything (although Mona still has 3 with more than a thousand to add), otherwise it won’t stay on others ...
            so that new riveting time takes a lot ... request
        2. RUSS
          RUSS 17 March 2018 17: 07
          +10
          Quote: Logall
          S-400 can shoot down ships if necessary

          Spaceships? laughing
          1. Logall
            Logall 17 March 2018 17: 14
            +18
            Quote: RUSS
            Quote: Logall
            S-400 can shoot down ships if necessary

            Spaceships? laughing

            Sarcasm? Understand! No, the S-400 has an upper limit. And on land and sea is capable of naughty ...
            1. Ascetic
              Ascetic 17 March 2018 18: 02
              +10
              Quote: Logall
              Sarcasm? Understand! No, the S-400 has an upper limit. And on land and sea is capable of naughty ...

              In Syria, for a moment, the Bastions are with RCC Yakhont for these purposes.
              1. You Vlad
                You Vlad 17 March 2018 18: 16
                +1
                Quote: Ascetic
                In Syria, for a moment, the Bastions are with RCC Yakhont for these purposes.

                They will not be needed, the US is likely to put a gasket between us, that's who it will be requestSomeone from the allies .. The farther into the forest, the more firewood ..
                1. electrooleg
                  electrooleg 17 March 2018 18: 57
                  +2
                  Quote: You Vlad
                  The US is likely to put a gasket between us


                  So you should flood the gasket. So that no one else agreed to be her
        3. Alex777
          Alex777 17 March 2018 17: 28
          +3
          S-400 can shoot down ships if necessary ...

          Do not tell my horseshoes. Who will come to your line of sight for you to shoot down with their anti-aircraft missiles? bully
          1. K-50
            K-50 17 March 2018 18: 27
            +6
            Quote: Alex777
            Do not tell my horseshoes. Who will come to your line of sight for you to shoot down with their anti-aircraft missiles?

            In fact, when firing at a surface / ground radio contrast target, the firing range is almost twice as long as when repelling an air threat. hi
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 18 March 2018 12: 41
              0
              From this place in more detail please. Where did you get a doubling? And what is the maximum range of defeat? At least approximately. hi
      2. vorobey
        vorobey 17 March 2018 17: 02
        +6
        Quote: 30 vis
        It smelled of gunpowder. And not just a smell, but it stank.


        I think they will not dare ... well, or after agreeing with our people they will bomb some mountain ... repeat
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 17 March 2018 17: 07
          +5
          Quote: vorobey
          I think they will not dare ... well, or after agreeing with our people they will bomb some mountain ...

          Your excrement! yes
      3. rammjager
        rammjager 17 March 2018 21: 21
        +1
        And why, it became scary? Al patriotism began to fall?
      4. sergo42
        sergo42 17 March 2018 21: 41
        +2
        Strelkov warned about the consequences of this Syrian adventure three years ago, all the very smart people were throwing poop at him for it. It would be better if LDNR really helped Ukrainians to wet.
        1. 72jora72
          72jora72 18 March 2018 02: 08
          +2
          Shooters warned about the consequences of this Syrian adventure three years ago, all very smart at him were throwing poop for it
          Girkin with his Pokemon Nesmiyanom (El Murid), not the most authoritative experts on Syria.
        2. Grigory_78
          Grigory_78 18 March 2018 05: 37
          +2
          Girkin with his tame publisher is nothing but contempt. What is there only hysteria during Ukraine’s attempt to send saboteurs to Crimea, when silence was clearly preferable to our special services. Girkin forgot that he was no longer in Ukraine and continued to immediately dump all the information available to him on the Internet. Apparently since then, the list of sources he has thinned greatly. Information about the death of 100500 Wagnerites is the top of reliability. It seems that there are more Wagnerites there than a Peshmerga crawling, about 500 dead, but there should be several times more wounded, many hospitals should be full of them, and not only in Syria. And already the cry over the fact that London will press our swindlers in retaliation now is completely epic. Those who take this brown substance in the open spaces of tyrnet seriously - sincerely sympathize.
    2. kit88
      kit88 17 March 2018 16: 59
      +4
      Someone recently said: If a fight is inevitable, you must hit first.
      Well, well, the coordinates are known, the programs are entered, it remains to issue a command. And let's go ...
      1. shvn
        shvn 17 March 2018 17: 10
        +16
        Yes, there will be nothing. Like last time, p.i.nd.s..s. , and we will express "extreme concern." Unfortunately, that will be so ...
        1. prapor75m
          prapor75m 17 March 2018 17: 26
          +20
          yes no Slavik, it seems that ours are serious - based on open data, the US and its allies are transferring aircraft to the border with Syria, in particular, airbases in Jordan, Turkey, Cyprus and Iraq, and the US Navy is located in the Mediterranean .

          To stop the blow, the Russian military department is resorting not only to verbal rhetoric, but also to very specific military actions.

          A number of Western publications claim that in the last day additional S-400 complexes were deployed to Syria, the media reported the transfer of dozens of Su-30SM and Su-35 fighters, the Admiral Essen and Admiral Grigorovich frigates entered the Mediterranean Sea, BDK "Orsk" and "Minsk", patrol ships "Inquisitive", reports newsli.ru.

          In general, the Russian group of ships in the Mediterranean Sea has increased to two dozen, including up to six submarines - this is for Russia an unprecedented accumulation of the fleet in a limited territory.

          According to information from the Turkish side, Russian special forces are on board the BDK
          1. askme
            askme 17 March 2018 18: 36
            +6
            Both are wrong. It makes no sense for the Yankees to spend ammunition on secondary targets in Syria, on the SAA militia in Syria. The main headquarters, the main warehouses - they are next to Russian bases and in Damascus. Russia will not allow them to shoot, there have already been statements. And the Yankees were silent. So there will be nothing but a war of nerves. Russia will also not allow aviation to be used near our bases in Syria and near Damascus. And if she does, she herself will allow the SAA to hit At-Tanf and the oil fields of D-EZ. And it will bring down all who will attack the SAA. Those. everything is symmetrical ...
            1. flicker
              flicker 17 March 2018 20: 14
              +3
              And if she does, she herself will allow the SAA to hit At-Tanf and the oil fields of D-EZ. And it will bring down all who will attack the SAA. Those. everything is symmetrical ...
              I think so too. If the Americans strike, they will be spread across Syria, including the Kurdish territories.
        2. Stas157
          Stas157 17 March 2018 17: 44
          +7
          Quote: shvn
          Yes, there will be nothing. Like last time, p.i.nd.s..s. , and we will express "extreme concern." Unfortunately, that will be so ...

          And if they hook someone, they will say that they were just mercenaries from the countries of the former CIS, as they said recently about our PMCs.
      2. Viktor.12.71
        Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 25
        +9
        Quote: kit88
        Someone recently said: If a fight is inevitable, you must hit first.

        War is craving either youth or fools. Can't wait to see firsthand how relatives and friends will burn in a radioactive fire? Nuclear weapons containment.
        1. kit88
          kit88 17 March 2018 17: 47
          +25
          The people fed and watered us and you (I believe that you served), just so that at the crucial moment we would not think about high matters, but simply obey the order. And the willingness to fulfill this order is an indicator of the combat readiness of our army.
          "You don’t need to think in the war. You need to think before the war." (C)
          1. Viktor.12.71
            Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 18: 06
            +1
            Quote: kit88
            You don’t have to think in war. We must think before the war

            Gold words! You should read the story of Vasily Alexandrovich Arkhipov.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 17 March 2018 22: 01
            +3
            Quote: kit88
            "You don’t need to think in the war. You need to think before the war." (C)

            Are you serious!? If they hadn’t thought about the war, there would have been no 45 of the year! You would have told this pearl to G.K.Zhukov ... he would have definitely cleaned up your physiognomy, as he had done this more than once to "thoughtless" generals! am
            1. kit88
              kit88 18 March 2018 00: 16
              +4
              Dear KAA. I hope you understand the meaning of what I said. For a second, if G.K. Zhukov, in response to Stalin’s order to take Berlin, began to talk about the harm that the Soviet tanks of the German ecology would do, about the inevitable victims that could be avoided if peace was made now, etc., and whether it was worth crossing the USSR’s border at all ... He didn’t think about that. He is a marshal. But the fighter does not need to think whether to go on the attack or wait.
              1. Maz
                Maz 20 March 2018 21: 39
                0
                And you forgive me for curiosity yourself then served? In which regiment, title, position?
                And then I was always taught differently, with Zhukovsky words: "Do not dare to think while fulfilling the order, and do not dare not to think while fulfilling the order!" And did you come up with your own something there? Interesting.
                1. kit88
                  kit88 20 March 2018 22: 26
                  0
                  Oh how! But you were not taught that orders are not discussed, but executed, precisely and on time.
                  And by the way, slow down, why are you taking chtoli from captivity? What would communicate in this tone?
                  Ps. VUS 4613043 like if the memory does not change.
        2. Grigory_78
          Grigory_78 18 March 2018 05: 51
          0
          Why did you decide that there will be an indispensable use of nuclear weapons? How many clashes have already occurred in countries possessing nuclear weapons - not ending in mutual strikes? The same India and Pakistan had border conflicts - so what? Were many nuclear weapons strikes delivered?
          The conflict in Syria does not threaten the territorial integrity of Russia - therefore, we have no reason to use nuclear weapons. If the United States is smart enough to limit the clash to a local conflict, there will be no nuclear war.
          Is it enough not to start a full-fledged local conflict? We will see. Alas, the choice is not ours. I sincerely hope that they don’t start. But not responding is no longer an option at all.
      3. Mengad
        Mengad 17 March 2018 22: 38
        0
        To say one thing ... and to do it ... it’s not to punch in the face ... it is to order a nuclear strike ... and the death of millions of innocent people ... it’s easy to say .. it’s hard to do it ... if you are an adequate person and are in your right mind ..
    3. newcomer
      newcomer 17 March 2018 17: 48
      +11
      what tells me, the blow will be tomorrow, or tonight.
      1. Mengad
        Mengad 17 March 2018 22: 39
        0
        Wangyu ... nifiga will not be .. and if it will .. then we will not know laughing
    4. mvnmln
      mvnmln 17 March 2018 19: 29
      +2
      Quote: igor1981
      The only answer is to bring down missiles and their carriers ...

      I agree with the missiles. It would be interesting to see our equipment in action. But with the carriers ... perhaps it smells of war, a big war!
      1. flicker
        flicker 17 March 2018 20: 18
        +4
        It smells, it smells. But they were warned. They want their death and the death of their allies, let them begin.
    5. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 17 March 2018 20: 26
      +5
      Quote: igor1981
      - Shoot down rockets and their carriers ...

      This is a very bold and powerful move: to attack the carrier ships of the “Axes”. The ship has diplomatic immunity and is the territory of the flag state under which it travels. Attacking a ship means attacking the territory of the USA ... This is the act of declaring WAR of a nuclear power ... on the 1-2 number in the economic ranking ... Are you personally ready for a nuclear war !? With the West, with the whole West?
      If Putin does not express in an ultimatum the inadmissibility of such a step ... then I personally will not vouch for anything ... A cool batch is possible ... with great economic costs for us ...
      (Resource we can’t endure such a “drive” ... Remember how in the film "Alexander Nevsky": -
      "sorry, the chain mail is too short ...")
      IMHO.
      1. Maz
        Maz 20 March 2018 21: 43
        0
        Well, there’s trollism too, let’s go down, no? But what if we don’t drown? But Emerikosov ass is not iron! Can you imagine how they shake? I think that in the beginning there will be reconnaissance in battle - several missiles from different directions from departing after launching carriers into the zone of absolute cover - to the base from an airplane, like the Israelis. But according to how we react, the second phase will begin. In any situation, the combination will be squeezed to the maximum dividends and benefits. even if everything goes wrong.
    6. Lex.
      Lex. 17 March 2018 22: 04
      +2
      Seriously ship warrant and how?
      Rocket planes can still be shot down and ships this is a nuclear war
      1. Igor V
        Igor V 17 March 2018 22: 34
        +1
        Guys, our General Staff has already warned. Why are you surprised?
    7. Tiksi-3
      Tiksi-3 18 March 2018 08: 49
      0
      Quote: igor1981
      The only answer is to bring down missiles and their carriers ...

      well .... drive and shoot ..... and rockets and carriers .....
    8. R Anatoly
      R Anatoly 18 March 2018 20: 26
      +1
      Igor1981 (Igor) Yesterday, 16:49

      The answer is not correct. SEND BACK WHERE WERE RELEASED. (BRAIN)
    9. Maz
      Maz 20 March 2018 21: 57
      0
      As far as I remember, the last trump hit in Syria, out of 26 missiles or how many did he launch there? The target hit no more than six, and then nearby. And at all they did not physically go astray. They were demolished by our electronic warfare equipment. They just didn’t tell anyone. But in vain should my grandmother shag. We’ll suppress these 600s so that they will fly away to Israel and there the American tomahawks are combining advanced IDF air defense systems. And we are saving the rockets. And we still have them. laughing
  2. AleksPol
    AleksPol 17 March 2018 16: 50
    +17
    The evening ceases to be languid. It seems to me that a large racket is planned. Will our answer and how.
  3. Dormidont
    Dormidont 17 March 2018 16: 52
    +5
    Great opportunity to test our new anti-ship missiles
    1. Genry
      Genry 17 March 2018 17: 29
      +1
      Daggers have not yet been tested in full.
      1. Grigory_78
        Grigory_78 18 March 2018 06: 00
        0
        But do we have them in Syria in the required quantity? It is extremely doubtful. Although of course, if necessary, they will appear, of course. But the same Israel is constantly watching over the Syrian air bases. I think the information is immediately available to the allies.
        1. gig334
          gig334 18 March 2018 06: 19
          +1
          Quote: Gregory_78
          But do we have them in Syria in the required quantity? It is extremely doubtful. Although of course, if necessary, they will appear, of course. But the same Israel is constantly watching over the Syrian air bases. I think the information is immediately available to the allies.

          Mig 31 launches a dagger from a distance of 2000 km, he does not need to do this from the territory of Syria.
          1. Genry
            Genry 18 March 2018 14: 01
            0
            Quote: gig334
            Mig 31 launches a dagger from a distance of 2000 km, he does not need to do this from the territory of Syria.

            So the goals are not in Syria. Jordan, the Mediterranean Sea, ...... Tomahawk range is comparable.
            1. gig334
              gig334 18 March 2018 17: 29
              0
              Quote: Genry
              Quote: gig334
              Mig 31 launches a dagger from a distance of 2000 km, he does not need to do this from the territory of Syria.

              So the goals are not in Syria. Jordan, the Mediterranean Sea, ...... Tomahawk range is comparable.

              And daggers will not be launched from the territory of Russia, they will fly up to the strike distance, and this is 2000 km and they will launch daggers on American ships. Although from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea less than 2000 km.
  4. keeper03
    keeper03 17 March 2018 16: 52
    +4
    This is a special US election campaign! Picked up time !!! Our need to respond tough and even more! angry soldier
  5. Methane
    Methane 17 March 2018 16: 53
    +5
    Our urgent need to stir up something in the oncoming courses.
  6. Vard
    Vard 17 March 2018 16: 55
    +14
    Yes ... we just didn’t have enough war ... but if something comes of it ... these people are gopniks ... and the gopniks only understand the fist in the face ...
    1. Maz
      Maz 20 March 2018 21: 46
      0
      You can not fight in large numbers. You can start shooting the highest performers, or blackmail the supreme leadership. But this is higher mathematics. But you can intimidate goosebumps.
  7. Yura Kharlamov
    Yura Kharlamov 17 March 2018 16: 55
    +9
    This will be another test of us for lice. For us ... or not
    1. Friday
      Friday 17 March 2018 17: 48
      +8
      Quote: yura kharlamov
      This will be another test of us for lice. For us ... or not

      There are no checks, for the USA we are not a threat, they put a bolt on our opinion.
      They will bomb Syria, and we will only watch.
      A missile defense system has been deployed around Russia, most of our nuclear weapons have been crushed, and Putin is "well done," he eliminated the chem. armaments during the strengthening and expansion of NATO, it is immediately obvious a natural born strategist.
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 17 March 2018 18: 10
        +16
        Quote: Friday
        most of our yao is crushed, and

        fool fool Immediately visible
        a born strategist.

        Only a sofa. yes
      2. flicker
        flicker 17 March 2018 20: 48
        +1
        There are no checks, for the USA we are not a threat, they put a bolt on our opinion.
        It’s a pity the gelding generals don’t hear this belay otherwise they would cry nervously yes
      3. alexddd
        alexddd 17 March 2018 21: 32
        0
        I don’t think that all chemical weapons have been eliminated.
        1. Grigory_78
          Grigory_78 18 March 2018 06: 06
          0
          Mass defeat is everything. The reasons are good.
      4. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 17 March 2018 22: 28
        +5
        Quote: Friday
        most of our yao is crushed,

        And where did you get such info? Do you even think what you're talking about? The degree of impact on the object of impact "Suppression" - implies the impossibility of using it for its intended purpose ... Do we have all silos and other carriers already disabled ??? fool
        1. Ascetic
          Ascetic 17 March 2018 22: 53
          +7
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          "Suppression" - implies the impossibility of its use for its intended purpose ..

          There are three degrees of combat readiness.-PU combat ready.located in delay to start(It is determined by the time of restoration work in full (time of decision to restore readiness + time of execution of works + time of march + time of work). Until the completion of the entire cycle of these operations, launching a rocket from this launcher is impossible. The delay is entered immediately after calculating its duration ) and sky ready.those. completely destroyed and launch is impossible.
          The Americans have always had one problem that is important for them - the possibility of reliable XNUMX% confirmation of the destruction of the potential of a retaliatory strike in real time.
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 17 March 2018 23: 35
            +5
            Quote: Ascetic
            There are three degrees of combat readiness-PU combat readiness.

            Stanislav, my respect! hi
            A colleague did not talk about silos, he talked about "nuclear weapons". And we have, as you know, a triad. According to the theory of OI, and from the Fundamentals (sorry, I'm military, still in stock) there are other degrees of destruction of objects. Moreover, the degree of "suppression" refers to area targets, such as an art battery, company / battalion stronghold, airfield, air defense division ...
            And for broadening the horizons - St. Petersburg! yes
            1. Ascetic
              Ascetic 18 March 2018 00: 08
              +6
              Alexander! hi
              In principle, for all objects with nuclear weapons it is the same, only the view from the side. It is estimated by the coefficient of incurred damage, which is calculated during the planning of the military base. To an elementary object, the positional area is already a composite areal object in which includes the EO.
              In short
              up to 0,2 - weak defeat; PU can be either combat ready or in a small time delay
              0,2 - 0,3 - suppression; PU in a delay is able to start guaranteed after restoration
              0,5 - 0,6 (0,6 - 0,9) - severe defeat PU targets in a long delay or sky ready
              more than 0,7 (0,9) - destruction of goals - Punebegotova, completely destroyed.

              For EA, there is still such a gradation in the degree of damage to the lesion.


              for a particular operation, accordingly, the alignment of such


              And as an example, the calculation of the defeat of adversaries suppression of typical objects, I will not give the layout for nuclear weapons. For a secret, but the technique is about the same
              1. Boa kaa
                Boa kaa 18 March 2018 00: 19
                +3
                Thank you, Stanislav. I knew this before. See http://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/dictionar
                y/[email protected] hi
      5. Grigory_78
        Grigory_78 18 March 2018 06: 04
        0
        Charming. Do you even know why we eliminated our chemical weapons? I won’t even ask about the rest, because it is obviously pointless.
      6. R Anatoly
        R Anatoly 18 March 2018 21: 01
        0
        Friday (Sergio) Yesterday, 17:48
        Already for .. sal - so the United States. Calm down, scared. It was evidently remembered how Donald Cook was draping.
        But we don't need chemical weapons - one REDUCE of what is worth.
  8. Amper
    Amper 17 March 2018 16: 58
    +14
    The armor is strong and our tanks are fast !?
    Modern and insurmountable air defense systems of Russia reliably cover our troops, as well as the territory and troops of our allies !?
    Not only missiles will be destroyed, but also their carriers and delivery vehicles !?
    Time X!
    A real war will check for rot and the state, and the military, and politicians, and diplomats!
    1. Methane
      Methane 17 March 2018 17: 02
      +3
      Well said! Bravo, Amp!
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 17 March 2018 17: 09
        +7
        Quote: Amper
        The armor is strong and our tanks are fast !?
        Modern and insurmountable air defense systems of Russia reliably cover our troops, as well as the territory and troops of our allies !?
        Not only missiles will be destroyed, but also their carriers and delivery vehicles !?
        Time X!
        A real war will check for rot and the state, and the military, and politicians, and diplomats!

        Quote: Methane
        Well said! Bravo, Amp!


        Yeah, the guys apparently took care of personal places in the cemetery .... I wonder if we’ll find out the result if that? well. this is .. who won
        1. Viktor.12.71
          Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 36
          +3
          Quote: vorobey
          well. this is .. who won

          No, we don’t know. There is a theory that the American NMD system national missile defense will detect the launch of ICBMs within 20-40 seconds plus 30 of the latest military early warning satellites, and the Russian SRO will detect missiles already on the horizon since there are no ground-based radars of the Russian Federation orbital group Oko-S since 2014, that is, from space we are blind.
          1. askme
            askme 17 March 2018 19: 12
            +12
            What nonsense. "On the horizon" .... Russia deployed ZagRLS around the entire perimeter of its borders. And he sees launches over Canada and Alaska. What is enough to answer in excess of time.

            In addition, the EW system Murmansk will destroy communications throughout the Mediterranean, Red Seas and the Persian Gulf in seconds. Kraukhi, Levers and so on. will do this for US satellites and for NATO forces in general. Without communication, without radar on carriers, the Allies will not be able to fight in the ATS against the Russian Federation in principle. Without any missiles, we can wash them ...
          2. flicker
            flicker 17 March 2018 20: 53
            +3
            Your confidence and the Merinsky generals ... otherwise they have sadness in their hearts
            1. askme
              askme 17 March 2018 21: 18
              +5
              So they all know it. Their aircraft carriers are now in US ports, with the exception of two, one in the Persian Gulf and the other in the East China Sea. Like amphibious forces. Only three at sea - the rest in the US, at the bases. If they were preparing to fight seriously, an absolutely different configuration would be. Now the operational tension of the US Navy is lower than in previous weeks, is on the decline.

              That is, now there is intimidation. In the blah blah genre. By inertia. There will be no blow. But ours do the right thing, that they react. It is necessary to show severity. But not aggression and fear!
          3. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 17 March 2018 22: 59
            +5
            Quote: Viktor.12.71
            from space we are blind.

            You are blind, but the videoconferencing is not!
            The Tundra system (product 14Ф142) is deployed - the spacecraft of the Unified Space System (CEN), designed to detect missile launches and which replaced the Oko-1 system. Launched 17.11.2015. The Tundra system determines the parameters of the ballistic trajectory of ICBMs and the likely area of ​​damage. In addition, the Tundra determines the launches and trajectories of not only ICBMs, but also other missiles, for example, launched from submarines. It is indicated that this is a "fifth generation apparatus." The launch of the 14Ф142 device marked the beginning of the deployment of the Unified Space System (CEN). In addition, a combat control system is installed on the satellite, that is, through it you can give a signal about retaliatory strike. Launched the Soyuz 2b launch vehicle with the Fregat upper stage from the Plesetsk launch site, 4 platform. In orbit at least - 2: Space 2510 and 2518.
          4. R Anatoly
            R Anatoly 18 March 2018 21: 09
            0
            Viktor.12.71 (viktor.12.71) Yesterday, 17:36
            quote ...... Oko-S is not from 2014, that is, from space we are blind.
            Or maybe there is! There are so many satellites there - not to breathe.
        2. R Anatoly
          R Anatoly 18 March 2018 21: 04
          0
          vorobey (Sashka) Yesterday, 17:09

          There will be nothing to collect. What coffins.
    2. alexddd
      alexddd 17 March 2018 21: 39
      +6
      I do not think that words about the destruction of carriers are thoughtlessly said. We have, I think, there are no fools to take amers on Pontus. I think that everything is really ready to repulse expansion, because of this, and such rhetoric. And Putin did not bluff on March 1 in circulation. He was just the first to reveal the cards, hoping that they would change their minds. The inadequacy of amers is irritating and frightening, i.e. those who are currently managing them. In the case of kneading, I really hope that a massive, destructive blow will be made not only on the fists of the USA, but mainly on the brains of this vile organism, and the United States is far from being brains. I really hope that our people know how to destroy this hydra.
      1. flicker
        flicker 18 March 2018 09: 25
        +1
        “I assure you: all this is in stock and works well”
        No wonder said
  9. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 17 March 2018 16: 59
    +6
    The day we sit, the other day we sit, and on the third day the Eagle Eye noticed that the barn does not have one wall (s)
    1. R Anatoly
      R Anatoly 18 March 2018 21: 24
      0
      Quote: Alex777
      The Americans have so many of these Tomahawks (> 4000) that we may not have enough anti-aircraft missiles ... But you still can't retreat. Otherwise, they cannot be stopped. hi

      Wow. For all of these 4000, only one computer is needed, and it is called RAPID !!! And C400 and C500 are not needed.
  10. Masya masya
    Masya masya 17 March 2018 17: 00
    +4
    take what are you going?
  11. Sadko88
    Sadko88 17 March 2018 17: 00
    +6
    It would be good for us to start civil defense exercises on a regular basis in large settlements. The population should competently act with the sounds of a siren. Now the preparation, to put it mildly, no
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 17 March 2018 17: 14
      0
      Quote: Sadko88
      Now the preparation, to put it mildly, no

      now for the sake of truth and serena do not help
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 17 March 2018 23: 05
      +6
      Quote: Sadko88
      It’s good for us to start civil defense exercises

      We would have to restore at least bad bomb shelters for a start. I climbed German Pillau - well, I immediately respected the gloomy German engineering genius! But in central Russia we don’t even have sheds! What GO are you going to talk about?
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 17 March 2018 23: 23
        +3
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        What GO are you going to talk about?

        Well you, my friend, grabbed .....
        Poor bomb shelters remained in Stalin-era houses. And they are now occupied by warehouses, shops and gyms. Since Khrushchev, such a luxury could not afford ...
        Well, Baltiysk is not an indicator in this regard. All hydrotechnical and fortifications from Pillau to Konigsberg have been built for many decades, starting from the second half of the 19th century. And the main goal was to protect against high-power artillery fire, which turned out to be very useful in the light of their use as shelters.
  12. Yura Kharlamov
    Yura Kharlamov 17 March 2018 17: 01
    0
    Amp. Only the military do not fly here. Flies and ha .. but separately
    1. The comment was deleted.
  13. Micfoster
    Micfoster 17 March 2018 17: 01
    +15
    Most likely tomorrow or tonight some sort of muck will be thrown out! Bastards! I wish strength to our military in Syria. And bring down everything that is not ours.
  14. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 17 March 2018 17: 01
    +1
    I would not be surprised if the "novice" of Saxon production will be. I think the world missed the war.
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 17 March 2018 17: 13
      +8
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      I would not be surprised if the "novice" of Saxon production will be. I think the world missed the war.
      The world didn’t get bored, but a number of irresponsible politicians in the USA and Veniko Britain obviously run into "lulina". If the exchange of blows takes place, then rewinding a time ago will not work and they will have to answer on accounts.
  15. Crabio
    Crabio 17 March 2018 17: 12
    0
    If it does, what can we technically contrast?
    1. Petio
      Petio 17 March 2018 17: 58
      +3
      I don’t think there will be bullets on ships, direct war with the USA
      for Assad’s sake, I don’t need it, but some of the axes will be knocked down this time including with the help of the S-400 so as not to look toothless and warn about it before the strike, I think the USA will also warn, as in 2017, the war with Russia is not needed either. But this will not stop the attack on Guta - it’s too late and the US military understands this well. The blow will be more for authority - the Americans also do not want to be accused of powerlessness and unwillingness to stop the bombing of Guta
      1. emwave
        emwave 17 March 2018 18: 20
        +1
        As for the decision to destroy the approaching Tomogavks, there are doubts - something similar happened when they hit the ATS aerodrome (when the unit did not reach). The USA is illegally located on the territory of the SAR and is almost openly supporting and organizing the Ishilovites. The status of Russia in Syria, as in this case, correlates with the actions of the United States? Under the USSR, there would already be a war between the USSR and the USA. Ala Vietnam to the utmost. Now, to understand something is very difficult. What decision will our commander make? Or maybe there is a very specific plan - this is more likely if you recall the operation in the Crimea.
    2. alexddd
      alexddd 17 March 2018 21: 51
      +1
      If ours drown the Amer ship, then the strike will be made at the base of Khmeimim and Tartus. In response, ours will hit missiles from ships and aircraft at Amer’s bases in Syria. The allies of the United States will try to hit our ships in the Mediterranean Sea and will receive an answer with a strategic aviation strike by non-nuclear munitions. There will be a big batch in the Mediterranean Sea, who will sink each other who can. Our invisible submarines pinch the NATO fleet thoroughly. The allies of the United States will hit Kaliningrad, and they will receive an answer from the Iskander and strategists about the US bases and their own. In short, Americans are afraid to hit the territory of Russia, so Russia will not hit the territory of the United States. Europe will be ravaged all over. And yet .. If nuclear weapons are used then from Europe by European pilots and then Europe Khan. Our strategists and iskander will respond with special ammunition. One thing is worrying - where is our civil defense, where are bomb shelters. What type doesn’t it make sense? It’s sad. People can then be kept in shelters. After all, we all have families and children. God forbid war!
  16. Voyager
    Voyager 17 March 2018 17: 12
    +2
    I’m wondering, let's say the states are firing rockets, and we will bring down these missiles and sink their carriers. What will happen next, after a moment? A war that will grow into a full-blown one, or what?
    1. Genry
      Genry 17 March 2018 17: 31
      +5
      And what about Cuba, Vietnam, Korea, ...? The Americans washed and rolled away.
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 17 March 2018 17: 32
      +7
      There will be a pause and then war. But the question is if the Americans hit Syria if something happens, but we won’t drown their carriers. I am sure of that. Recently, we have been completely toothless (at least that's what our foreign policy looks like, just maybe I don’t know what?).
      1. alexddd
        alexddd 17 March 2018 21: 55
        +2
        Do you think the representative of the General Staff Gerasimov himself answered? There was a pause of 3-4 hours, then the answer. Do you think that our short-sighted amers took to the show and drove themselves into a trap before the election? I don’t think so. Most likely everything is calculated and everything is ready. The carriers will destroy.
        1. Yura Yakovlev
          Yura Yakovlev 17 March 2018 23: 05
          +3
          "Most likely everything is calculated and everything is ready. The carriers will be destroyed."

          I think you are right. The Foreign Ministry’s response to England just confirms that ours are determined.
    3. emwave
      emwave 17 March 2018 18: 24
      +7
      Rather, the carriers will not sink, but the rockets will bring down to the maximum. Further, tough actions on the ground against the needles with the involvement of the VKS in full growth.
      1. Voyager
        Voyager 17 March 2018 19: 02
        +3
        In my opinion, this is the most realistic option, the only question is that we will finally prove our weakness and the inconsistency of words with real deeds. Why then was this formidable pathos originally ..
        1. Anti-Corr.
          Anti-Corr. 17 March 2018 19: 13
          +3
          Quote: Voyager
          that we will finally prove our weakness and the inconsistency of words with real deeds. Why then was this formidable pathos originally ..

          Do you remember the saying from the 90s, “a cheap show off is more expensive than a gun” and who used it? A lot of water has flowed since then, and “a dog on the way, maybe it was possible to grow up.”
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Mengad
        Mengad 17 March 2018 17: 50
        +4
        Sorry, of course, I don’t know how long you lived in this world, but judging by your post ... you didn’t get your mind. Thank you for your attention.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Mengad
                Mengad 17 March 2018 19: 09
                +3
                I now live in the West, as you put it, Yes, Latvia has become the West, but there are many Russian speakers, and people who are not indifferent to Russia, please take into account that Russia and Putin are two different things for them. Have you been to the West? Have you talked to ordinary people? Or didn’t you go further from your Zaryupinsk? And you lived and worked in England and Germany (Don’t worry, I’m not recruited, I have my own principles) Do you know the attitude of the common people towards Russia? They are afraid of it ... they don’t respect it for certain achievements .. .a be afraid .. But respect does not come from the fact that a person has a weapon .. but for his business ... In this case ... Russia wants self-respect by holding a revolver in his hand .... will you respect a man who points a gun at you and demands respect? You will be afraid of him ... Political game on those or there have always been and will be other fronts ... but the people in this game should not participate and hate each other because someone needs it? Do you agree with me?
                1. anjey
                  anjey 17 March 2018 19: 44
                  +7
                  Usually bring Colt on Uncle Sam’s partner-beneficiary ... I come from the USSR, I remember that schools were built in Afghanistan, that the Yankees built there for their twenty-year occupation ????
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 17 March 2018 19: 48
                    +6
                    Quote: anjey
                    prerogative

                    * not "at", but "pre"
                    * instead of "e" - "o"
                    * instead of "o" - "a"
                    Would you put it simpler or something ... otherwise, mnu after such words has a very bad stomach laughing
                  2. Mengad
                    Mengad 17 March 2018 19: 55
                    0
                    Yes, you are right, the Soviet Union built in Afghanistan. And they are the United States ... they take the Yankees ... not fair to the long-suffering people of Afghanistan. I agree with you. But you understand what’s the matter? The thing is, unlike Russia .. .USA first of all thinks about itself and its people .. that is, its interest, But Russia ... we are a good soul ... we give ... let our people live below the poverty line, but we are kind .... from this ,, kindness, but such and evil .. and we hate others and ourselves. Maybe I didn’t say it right?
                2. Bad_santa
                  Bad_santa 17 March 2018 22: 55
                  +4
                  And you propose not respecting the British for the stupid behavior of their government? Or do you want to tell us we need to be afraid of the Americans, because their bases are around Russia? Or are Germans afraid, because German soldiers are already in the Baltic states? If that fear appears because of their insecurity and because of the understanding of the incorrectness and immorality of their actions. Speaking frankly, fear and hysteria are artificially driven up. Among his relatives in Germany and their acquaintances did not notice fear of Russia.
                3. Separ
                  Separ 18 March 2018 17: 11
                  0
                  “They are afraid, they mean respect” (People)
            2. Mengad
              Mengad 17 March 2018 18: 27
              +6
              Judging by your vocabulary, my post above is true. You are our warrior. You, like a monkey, give you a stick. You will go bananas from a tree on Putin’s order. How do I differ from you? My grandfather fought and freed his native land from the Nazi invaders , not in order that we would relive again, what our grandfathers and great-grandfathers had to endure. If I take arms in my hands, then to protect my home and Motherland from the aggressor, And not by the order of some kind of swindler. Ivan? You are not Ivan .. you are a blockhead excuse me, but it’s so. Ivan-Kind, strong, and fair .. and for itnik motherland instead agressor.Py Ssu In Russia two bedy..duraki and roads.
              1. Galaxy
                Galaxy 17 March 2018 19: 08
                0
                We have already learned how to build roads more or less, but there are more and more fools, and Russian medicine in this direction is absolutely powerless. The trouble is ....
                1. anjey
                  anjey 17 March 2018 19: 29
                  +1
                  Have you heard Rabinovich for a long time? He cannot be cured ...
              2. The Emperor
                The Emperor 17 March 2018 19: 16
                +1
                Quote: Mengad
                If I take a weapon in my hands, then to protect my home and Motherland from the aggressor, And not by the order of some kind of scumbag.

                I agree, why Syria = oil for us. Remember how many Erdogan profits from Serial oil totaled, bombed fuel trucks, and now silence, apparently agreed. The Americans will strike Syria without a doubt, not for nothing that the GDP showed terrible cartoons and threatened the decaying west. Well, who is afraid of us after the tomatoes, well, it's ridiculous. I generally have the opinion that the GDP is doing everything that Russia would not be ....
                1. Mengad
                  Mengad 17 March 2018 20: 16
                  +3
                  Mr. Putin put it: “Why do we need such a world if Russia will not be there?”
                  His message is clear ... if what? The whole world is in ruins .... I watched Putin a lot ... though not a fan of him, but somehow I didn’t notice such words from his lips: Peace, friendship, good neighborly relations. He pursues his goals, and the goals of some gentlemen, and the people of Russia are held hostage by him. This is my ichmo.
                  1. region58
                    region58 18 March 2018 02: 05
                    +3
                    Quote: Mengad
                    Mr. Putin put it: “Why do we need such a world if Russia will not be there?”
                    His message is clear ... if what?

                    Man, what are you pulling words out of context? These words of Putin were a response to the actions and statements of "our Western partners", which you preferred not to mention. And it would be necessary. Then everything falls into place.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. Mengad
                      Mengad 18 March 2018 09: 28
                      0
                      Here is the video, .. about asked himself a question .. and actually answered himself ... out loud.
              3. anjey
                anjey 17 March 2018 19: 20
                +3
                .
                Do you know the attitude of the common people towards Russia? They are afraid of it
                I would like to hope that in addition to the crosses and plebs. Frightened by your inadequate and corrupt media, there are people who are reasonable, thinking and constructively thinking, and with the narrow-minded, we will not all go far, understand that you don’t have a future without Russia, the United States and the West need you as servile , anti-Russian buffer and poison you like a hungry doggie against us, for this you and the economy are pulled like rubber bands ..., well, of course there are people who just pass by - but this is not fish and not meat, they are really slaves in their "free" country, do not decide anything, pro-Western rules to the cerebellum coccyx elite ...
                1. Mengad
                  Mengad 17 March 2018 20: 50
                  +3
                  Do you think there are few adequate people in the same Baltic? And they don’t understand that the Baltic and its people are used as mongrels? Yes, there are a bunch of ,, jingo-patriots ,, and a procession of ss legionnaires which I use as old dogs on occasion. The Baltic has always been a buffer zone they are afraid of this ... and the fact that it is being used now is understood by 85% of the population. It’s not the people’s fault .. but the politicians and their provocateurs who don’t need to be led on occasion. A SMD * Means of Mass Disinformation) They are in the West what is in Russia. they are contracted, and they are friends with the Government to some extent ... But in Russia, the SMD is friendly with the Government. If we assume that the financing of the SMD of Russia comes from ... the budget ... who pays and orders the music.
              4. anjey
                anjey 17 March 2018 19: 35
                +8
                You are the Labusovsky pretzel, my grandfather, heroically died on Belarusian soil in December 1943, and I'm proud of him, and when every fag ... I raise my head, like on the edge, where I left a piece of heart, I’d like to shoot marching Bander today, they were prepared to burn our children tomorrow, and whoever doesn’t realize that the Anglo-Saxon creatures kindle the Third World War and the main goal is Russia, I can’t help you, excuse me ...
                1. Mengad
                  Mengad 17 March 2018 21: 11
                  0
                  Are you proud of the grandfather who defended his homeland from the aggressor? My grandfather also defended the USSR from the aggressor, and I also fit them, but my grandfather was lucky, my grandfather ended the war near Königsberg, wounded, you live in the past, you are angry, can not forgive? I I’ll answer you this: Only a strong person is capable of forgiveness. You need to live in the present and think about the future .... the future of our children ... and the bright sky above their heads ... as our grandfathers were fighting the German-German fascist aggressors. ... All the best to you.
              5. Separ
                Separ 18 March 2018 17: 14
                0
                To the "troubles" add one more - traitors, like you Balts ..
            3. anjey
              anjey 17 March 2018 19: 55
              +4
              all the more, you should be ashamed of the fact that you are on the side of the enemy and sow his ideology here, what would your grandfather say, keeping the PCA to the advantage ????
              1. anjey
                anjey 17 March 2018 20: 00
                +3
                Only the hidden enemies of Russia of a certain nationality can support you, there is nothing constructive, clever in your speech, and you did not substantiate your experience abroad not in the negative, not in the positive, adyu ...
          2. Korax71
            Korax71 17 March 2018 18: 56
            +1
            The post has deleted its own. Otherwise it will be sent to the ban in a patriotic impulse.
            1. anjey
              anjey 17 March 2018 19: 40
              +3
              And you cut the truth, the uterus, can squeal laughing ...
          3. iliitchitch
            iliitchitch 17 March 2018 20: 26
            +1
            Quote: anjey
            and God forbid you fucked for Russia, are you from such pi-v ..?

            "What was that, Michael?" . The fall of Meehan from the pedestal, it seems.
  18. Amper
    Amper 17 March 2018 17: 13
    +1
    Quote: yura kharlamov
    Amp. Only the military do not fly here. Flies and ha .. but separately

    I always mean not military soldiers, sergeants, warrant officers, officers, but those who manage resources and politics. To shoot down, not to shoot down, to send a reserve, not to send, to keep ammunition, not to save, etc.
  19. motorized rifle
    motorized rifle 17 March 2018 17: 14
    +4
    The Queen in admiration! (C) The whole World in admiration! What a wonderful opportunity to wipe it to pieces! Especially for those who have neither money nor children. Here is just one question, not a question. And why, nevertheless, did not tear up this "wonderful grandson"? Is DPRK stronger than the Russian Federation? By the way, indeed, Russia has something to answer, while Eun - God knows him, so it’s better not to mess with him. Something tells me that there will be no blow, and if there is, then everything will somehow get complicated, for EVERYONE!
    1. Viktor.12.71
      Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 46
      +1
      Quote: motorized infantryman
      that there will be no blow, and if it is, then everything will somehow become more complicated, for ALL!

      Civilizations will be burned to hell, and those who survive will see half a century of nuclear winter, and this is in the best case. At its worst, the only survivor will be Earth.
      1. alexddd
        alexddd 17 March 2018 22: 54
        +6
        May there be no winter. And there will be no radioactive contamination if thermonuclear ammunition is used. Read the test of 50 megatons of ammunition on Novaya Zemlya during the time of Khrushchev, that famous “Kuzkina mother”. An hour after the explosion, nuclear physicists, testers, and military were in place. The background was normal. A thermonuclear reaction is a reaction of the synthesis of deuterium and tritium of hydrogen isotopes with conversion to helium. a small nuclear charge serves as a fuse for the reaction, and probably free neutrons from this fuse die out in the main fusion reaction, and that’s pure after it. Those "dirty" atomic bombs of the 1945-1955 model are no longer in the arsenal of countries. We will not be., Evaporate, the city will collapse. The winner may be. That is the question, and this is scary in the first place. There will be no nuclear winter, because in the first place all the charges that are present will not explode. After a massive blow to the main cities, no particular answer will follow (we may still have this "dead hand", but they don’t). Secondly, initially this "nuclear winter" was most likely a bogeyman for mutual intimidation of the inhabitants. Observe the ash discharge by the volcano, how much power is the volcano (several atomic bombs) and the ashes are deposited and carried away and the whole business. A man of too much opinion about himself, we are gossips unreasonable on the body of Mother Earth. We simply can’t even get along with each other, they invented shit of all sorts that would destroy each other, and they gathered in space for planets to others! What will we tell the aliens that like rats in each other’s barrels, they gnaw 5 thousand years with an average life expectancy of 70 years. A disgrace.
        1. Cananecat
          Cananecat 18 March 2018 01: 28
          0
          Do you know yellowstone? Volcanoes in Kamchatka? Imagine what will happen as a result of an attack on the United States if at least 2-3 warheads explode within 100 km of the volcano? This is not a nuclear winter, but the sky will close well ...
  20. tchoni
    tchoni 17 March 2018 17: 21
    +2
    The question is different, what is going to be done by our general staff?
  21. samarin1969
    samarin1969 17 March 2018 17: 25
    +4
    It is interesting how the “RF” will respond to the strategic investor and partner in the “local Pearl Harbor”. ...
    1. Micfoster
      Micfoster 17 March 2018 17: 31
      +5
      MO must be appointed at 6-00 tomorrow’s exercise of strategic nuclear forces. Announce training launches of missiles to Kamchatka.
  22. Kent0001
    Kent0001 17 March 2018 17: 29
    +3
    Well and then what? They can fall in love with the elections at night, and how do we react? Will we answer or will we die again? The general did not answer this question.
    1. Viktor.12.71
      Viktor.12.71 17 March 2018 17: 47
      0
      Quote: Kent0001
      The general did not answer this question.

      Replied. He said that in the event of a strike against the RF Armed Forces there would be a rejection, he did not say with words or weapons. But Assad will not be responsible.
    2. Separ
      Separ 17 March 2018 18: 02
      0
      We will wait for the first landing of their rocket on our territory (so that they wouldn’t say that we started first0 and then we beat out of all kinds - land, air, surface and underwater, and then we'll see who has the eggs more steel ..
      1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT 17 March 2018 18: 56
        +3
        We will wait for the first landing of their rocket on our territory (so that they wouldn’t say that we started first0 and then we beat out of all kinds - land, air, surface and underwater, and then we'll see who has the eggs more steel ..

        There is a big doubt that she will be alone!
        1. Separ
          Separ 17 March 2018 19: 36
          0
          we will have a lot too.
      2. Freeman
        Freeman 17 March 2018 19: 13
        +2
        Quote: Separ
        We will wait for the first landing of their rocket on our territory (so that they wouldn’t say that we started first

        In the case of the full-scale use of nuclear weapons, and this follows from the military doctrine of Russia when "surviving a missile landing on our territory", it will not be at all interesting to "who started first."
        1. Anti-Corr.
          Anti-Corr. 17 March 2018 19: 36
          0
          Quote: Freeman
          the survivors

          they will envy the dead. I don’t want to burn in a nuclear fire at someone’s whim.
    3. region58
      region58 18 March 2018 02: 37
      0
      Quote: Kent0001
      The general did not answer this question.

      Quote: Viktor.12.71
      Replied. He said that in the event of an attack on the Russian Armed Forces there will be a rejection

      Yes, everything has already been said:
      Washington plans to launch a bombing raid on government blocks in Damascus. At the same time, in Damascus, in the institutions and facilities of the Ministry of Defense of Syria, there are Russian military advisers, representatives of the Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties and members of our military police.
      Therefore, in the event of a threat to the lives of our troops, the armed forces of the Russian Federation will take retaliatory measures both on missiles and on carriers (!) That will use them.

      "in the event of a threat to the lives of our troops" - a rocket flew towards Syria - there is a threat to life - there is. Well, that’s it.
      From 4:30 a.m.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. BARHAN
    BARHAN 17 March 2018 17: 33
    +1
    Quote: kit88
    Someone recently said: If a fight is inevitable, you must hit first.
    Well, well, the coordinates are known, the programs are entered, it remains to issue a command. And let's go ...

    This is the motto of Putin, even from Leningrad streets during his youth.
  25. Doliva63
    Doliva63 17 March 2018 17: 34
    +8
    Well? It's time to practice intercepting missiles? We don’t know where they are flying.
    Or again express concern?
  26. lance
    lance 17 March 2018 17: 35
    +1
    My Russian Federation does not understand that there are three options? 1. to spread the whole territory with thermal bars where provocations are being prepared for the accumulation and the factories of militant means are enough. there is no provocation, we must come up with a new one. 2. the same as the last time the reb and pro to the aid — a decrease in the effect of -50% 3. 2 option + destruction by all means of delivery of US ships that launched rockets. (Syria has not enough of its own max 3 divisions of balls and bastions, but in what condition are they?
    4000 missiles will not be launched; the hegemon is naked, than to fill the launchers.
    1. emwave
      emwave 17 March 2018 18: 30
      0
      The effectiveness of the Tomogawks in EW conditions is in question. Paragraphs 1 and 2.
    2. Bad_santa
      Bad_santa 17 March 2018 23: 03
      0
      For some reason, we have to think more about protecting Syria than the Syrians themselves
  27. Vlad Morozov
    Vlad Morozov 17 March 2018 17: 37
    +4
    Cheeks are inflated! I think you should be prepared for any options anyway! But the military response must be tough !!!
  28. Vladimir K.
    Vladimir K. 17 March 2018 17: 40
    +6
    I hope that carriers do not mean UAVs, but ordinary fighters, bombers and ships. It must be given in the teeth from the heart. The states will not respond with atomic weapons, and they will not go to a full-blown conflict on all fronts, although there will be horror and hysteria. But we are used to it.
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 17 March 2018 21: 57
      +1
      Quote: Vladimir K.
      although hysteria and howling will be - horror. But we are used to it.

      So the jackals of Tobacco have been fighting on the lapworm day. Either this teresa, her mother, is completely wretched, or they bent her so much that she only screams in writing and remains. This is still a preamble, as I understand it.
      Why are they doing such stupid things, miserables.
  29. anjey
    anjey 17 March 2018 17: 43
    +3
    We note the presence of signs of preparation for possible shocks.
    - said on Saturday the head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Federation, Colonel-General Sergey Rudskoy.
    D and to hell with us, if only Russia lived, let the Yankees crawl with a drunk, Why did we start all this in Syria?
    So give the stars to the world bully, without bending under this system ..., break to hell and build your own, Russian, and all the shit, then you will lick your legs ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  30. Separ
    Separ 17 March 2018 17: 44
    +2
    Looking at the mental abilities of Boris, they think that this is computer shooting, the response will be to micro-shaving - we will accuse her of using chemical weapons against a citizen of the Russian Federation
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. anjey
    anjey 17 March 2018 17: 53
    0
    General Staff of the Russian Federation: the United States is preparing to strike on Syria

    Beat Vasya first !!!
  33. Separ
    Separ 17 March 2018 17: 53
    +1
    Not for nothing 3-4 days ago, the whole sky over Voronezh was in condensation trails in the direction from the north-west to the southeast - none other than “gifts” were taken to Syria ...
    1. Fulcrumxnumx
      Fulcrumxnumx 17 March 2018 21: 35
      +1
      And it was not by chance that at the western air borders of the Russian Federation on the Baltic air direction, not only did the RC-135V / W radio electronic and radio reconnaissance aircraft, but also on 2 AWACS E-3A suddenly begin to patrol. The AN / APY-2 airborne radar operators tried to probe the composition of the air component of tactical aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which is distilled from the air bases of the Western Military District to the Syrian theater of radio silence in radio silence mode ..
    2. Servla
      Servla 18 March 2018 13: 26
      0
      Gifts are not transported through Voronezh.
  34. New Year day
    New Year day 17 March 2018 17: 54
    +2
    if so, then we stand on the eve of ....

    Gerasimov’s promise to bring down everything and the desire of the Americans to see it - smacks of Vietnam
  35. kriwo.alek
    kriwo.alek 17 March 2018 17: 57
    +3
    I am surprised at the position of Russia. Is there no mutual assistance agreement with Syria? Is not Russia the guarantor of the integrity of Syria? So tell me: what the hell, you have to bomb Syria, and Moscow again to hide his head like an ostrich in the sand. What, is it really weak for Russia to punish s and a hedgehog with them to the fullest? Kedmi is 100 times right when he says that if Russia continues to BE WASED, then they will SHOE US IN LAPTI.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 17 March 2018 19: 05
      +7
      The position of the Russian Federation is dictated by realities. Because in the world of capital there can be only 1 rat king, the rest are hangers-on. And the hangers-on are not afraid. Tomorrow disconnected from Swift, and -. And once, with a few corpses, the Yankees wiped their nose over the entire 6th fleet (Tripoli, in the 80s, for example).
  36. Yura Kharlamov
    Yura Kharlamov 17 March 2018 17: 59
    0
    Well, shoot at least one fu18. They are constantly breaking.
  37. K-50
    K-50 17 March 2018 18: 04
    +2
    How's Wang? When will Syria fall?
    It is necessary to think that after massive blows with “axes” the kipzha will start another one. negative sad
    The ghouls are crazy about it, and they want to organize a new war on the whole planet in order to write off their debts. But the campaign didn’t realize that the stupid snouts of the shit could not write off debts to anyone, there would be no debtors or creditors. sad
    1. Cananecat
      Cananecat 18 March 2018 01: 32
      +1
      "... Syria has not yet fallen ...", but who said that history will follow this vector. Even she said that she sees a possible option ... i.e. there may be several.
  38. groks
    groks 17 March 2018 18: 05
    +1
    It looks like the MORF got involved in the election campaign. The USA did not interfere and does not interfere especially with the demolition of government districts of the Syrian capital. They will say that they definitely know about Assad’s XO and that he was going to apply it now. What would entail ..... Then there will be a multi-year trial with a test tube shock. Well, apologize in the end - as usual.
    Unless, of course, earlier there will be a message that Assad has been overthrown and to ensure the democratic elections of the new Assad ..... Also standard.
    Our government could lend Assad a dozen Iskanders and Bastions. This is not there. So there will be an expression of concern.
  39. Northern warrior
    Northern warrior 17 March 2018 18: 05
    +2
    If the United States hits Khmeimim and Tartus, then it is necessary to destroy their AUG with X-32 and X-47M2 missiles equipped with nuclear warheads. If the blow is only on the Syrian forces, then it is necessary to bring down the tomahawks and aircraft of the pro-American coalition. Vietnam 2!
    1. Voyager
      Voyager 17 March 2018 19: 05
      0
      If my memory serves me right, the constitution does not allow the use of nuclear weapons first in the absence of a direct threat to the country. The region is still not ours. Yes, and the point is in the YaBCh, usual enough ..
      1. Northern warrior
        Northern warrior 17 March 2018 19: 33
        0
        An attack on the base is tantamount to an attack on the territory of the Russian Federation, so the use of nuclear weapons is perfectly acceptable. It should also take into account the strong air defense of the AUG, for the breakthrough of which several tens of anti-ship missiles with a high-explosive warhead are required.
  40. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 17 March 2018 18: 08
    0
    Quote: Viktor.12.71
    Quote: СРЦ П-15
    How many forces we have in Syria and what, I think, are known only in the General Staff.

    In Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Oman, Qatar. In total, these bases are approximately 77 US troops, these are the bases of the Air Force, Air Defense, Navy, and in Qatar there is one of the largest US armored vehicles bases in the Middle East, and the U.S. Air Force command post is also located there. Recently, 000 US marines arrived in the Mediterranean. We exclude nuclear weapons, since Israel has it and launching in that direction will lead to an immediate response.

    Well, you give ...
    "... nuclear weapons are excluded, since Israel has it ..."
    Personally seen? How I envy you ... Even, damn it, Wikipedia did not see, but only heard, and you saw !!!
    1. alexddd
      alexddd 18 March 2018 00: 31
      +1
      If there is, and so what? This piece the size of 1/8 of the territory of the Omsk region will also be at war with us. Do not make me laugh. Even the memories will not remain.
  41. lopvlad
    lopvlad 17 March 2018 18: 11
    +3
    US preparing to strike at Syria


    well, and you are making preparations to repel this blow so that the Americans can see signs that you are ready to respond harshly.
    The American star-striped gopnik respects only power, and if you show it, you will devour nafig.
  42. Vlad Petrov
    Vlad Petrov 17 March 2018 18: 11
    +1
    Russian ship. also a military base in Khmeinim (lease under an agreement by Syria) is the territory of the Russian Federation. The current doctrine allows the possibility of using nuclear weapons to repel aggression, which is committed even using conventional weapons. DPRK Comrade Eun Shuganul however old man Trump here the other day the other day with a young hydrogen bomb. Well now, how have you already stopped being afraid?
  43. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 17 March 2018 18: 18
    +1
    Well, do not spoil the karmic status of Americans. After all, if our air defense works as it should, they will get a blow to their reputation - they will not wash it off. wassat
  44. Amper
    Amper 17 March 2018 18: 19
    +1
    American fascism is ready for any crime, like its predecessor, German fascism, in order to achieve the world hegemony of the American nation, and since the middle of the last century its bloody traces can be found all over the world, and he stubbornly continues to achieve his goal.
    Its satellites and partners play the role of nothing more than weak-willed puppets.
    1. alexddd
      alexddd 18 March 2018 00: 34
      0
      The most accurate expression of modern realities. And again, the whole world is silent as in 1939. Then, after hitting the head, they will sing "Rotten fascist evil will drive a bullet in the forehead .."
  45. anjey
    anjey 17 March 2018 18: 26
    0
    Quote: Mengad
    Sorry, of course, I don’t know how long you lived in this world, but judging by your post ... you didn’t get your mind. Thank you for your attention.
    bought for you, and sold it to you, an expert on the mind and life in Russia, it was yours in Odessa and Berlin, it became ours in the Urals laughing
  46. Amper
    Amper 17 March 2018 18: 37
    +3
    Quote: motorized infantryman
    The Queen in admiration! (C) The whole World in admiration! What a wonderful opportunity to wipe it to pieces! Especially for those who have neither money nor children. Here is just one question, not a question. And why, nevertheless, did not tear up this "wonderful grandson"? Is DPRK stronger than the Russian Federation? By the way, indeed, Russia has something to answer, while Eun - God knows him, so it’s better not to mess with him. Something tells me that there will be no blow, and if there is, then everything will somehow get complicated, for EVERYONE!


    DPRK is stronger in spirit and unity! Kim Jong-un is the father of most North Koreans.
    And we have? Stolen, destroyed, without a king in the head, modern Russia is not an example to her.
  47. Radikal
    Radikal 17 March 2018 18: 41
    +1
    Quote: Logall
    On this occasion, the President of the Russian Federation and uttered a text about new models of nuclear weapons. Like: knock down and do not hesitate.
    Americans are either superfluous missile carriers, or doubt that an answer will really follow.
    Pysy: S-400 can shoot down ships if necessary ... But I think that without them there is something ...

    Maybe "shoot down" ships - if they fly! wassat In general, usually ships (when it comes to floating objects) are destroyed, drowned, or simply sent to the bottom! lol
  48. HAM
    HAM 17 March 2018 18: 42
    +3
    ONE THING HEALTHY STRESSES: Kiev Ukrainians pulled troops to the Donbass at a certain hour X, a strike was being "unexpectedly" planned in Syria, Teresa got rid of it in earnest. Only one Tampon was sitting quietly, but with some kind of meanness at one o'clock.
    It seems that these are links of the same chain. There are fears that synchronously will start both in the Donbass and in Syria, with the expectation that Russia will not cope ......
  49. cedar
    cedar 17 March 2018 18: 44
    +6
    Whoever understands what is really going on will choose the Commander-in-Chief tomorrow, the rest will choose the President.
    See the root, dear ...
  50. Radikal
    Radikal 17 March 2018 18: 45
    0
    Quote: anjey
    General Staff of the Russian Federation: the United States is preparing to strike on Syria

    Beat Vasya first !!!

    And who is Vasya? belay