MiG-31 of Kamchatka air base worked to intercept conditional enemy aircraft

17
MiG-31 marine fighters aviation During the exercise, Pacific Fleet intercepted conditional enemy aircraft and worked out relocation to another airfield with refueling in the air, reports press office Eastern District.



MiG-31 high-altitude fighter-interceptors of the Kamchatka airbase of a separate mixed aviation regiment of Pacific naval aviation fleet during the flight tactical exercises, they fulfilled the tasks of intercepting conditional enemy aircraft that violated the airspace of the Russian Federation,
says release.

The role of the intruder was performed by two anti-submarine aircraft IL-38H, imitating the strategic bombers of the conditional enemy.

It is reported that "a pair of high-altitude MiG-31 interceptor fighters from the duty forces, who, in conjunction with ground-based radio, successfully detected and classified targets, and later carried out electronic air-to-air missile launches, were alerted.

In addition, during the exercise, the interceptors "worked off the relocation to the airfield in the Chukotka Autonomous District and refueled in the air from the IL-78 aircraft."
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    16 March 2018 15: 30
    It’s not necessary to carry out these exercises, but in the area of ​​the North Sea
    1. +1
      16 March 2018 17: 17
      Yes, by the number of exercises, moreover, in all regions of the country, we probably already surpassed the USSR. In my time, we carried out firing only once a year on final inspections and three rounds each ..... True, this is alarming very much like the preparation of the Russian Armed Forces for a possible REAL repulsion of aggression. God grant that we have time.
      1. 0
        16 March 2018 17: 29
        Quote: Topotun
        Yes, by the number of exercises, moreover, in all regions of the country, we probably already surpassed the USSR.

        No, they haven’t even caught up yet ...
  2. +1
    16 March 2018 15: 34
    And let this "conditional adversary" stock up on diapers
  3. 0
    16 March 2018 15: 41
    Well, with all due respect. Well, when will something new come to replace these ancient twinks !? Yes, a good car, I do not argue, but it can’t last so long. 81 year of release! , and where are the newbies being asked?
    After all, "they" there are riveting in full!
    1. +9
      16 March 2018 16: 04
      Dezinto
      Years of serial production 81-94 years.
      And in Elizovo there are still not upgraded sides ...
      The sailors are still ahead with modernization, they just once were transferred to the Navy, it is not clear why ... well, they were financed there on a residual basis ....
    2. 0
      16 March 2018 18: 00
      In vain do you worry about 31, he has outstripped his time and is still reaping the head start given to him. Here is the Su-24 or Tu-95 - these are really mastodons
  4. 0
    16 March 2018 15: 52
    getting ready to receive daggers?
  5. +1
    16 March 2018 16: 20
    Missiles are few that electronic launches and not combat? You won’t learn much at such launches.
    1. 0
      16 March 2018 17: 19
      Quote: Herkulesich
      There are few rockets that electronic launches and not military ones, soldier.
    2. 0
      16 March 2018 18: 01
      Goals for combat launches are very costly to launch in the stratosphere
    3. +2
      17 March 2018 12: 24
      We also launch Herculesych two or three times a year, and the rest of the time, tactically! It makes no sense to constantly shoot high-precision and expensive auras at the same expensive targets. Tactical launches fully allow the formation and maintenance of skills in combat use by crews; in the 90s and early 2000s, in YES, launches were generally carried out once a year, 2 crews from a regiment (usually not lower than the deputy commander), these were the times .
  6. 0
    16 March 2018 18: 47
    Is it soon they will attach a dagger and hold on to the country of Japan?
  7. 0
    17 March 2018 05: 29
    Quote: Voyager
    it’s just that they were once transferred to the Navy, it’s not clear why ...

    They should be in close cooperation with the Navy, as they cover the base of atomic submarines.
    1. +2
      17 March 2018 12: 19
      Aviation also covers many important combined-arms facilities, so now give the Air Force subordinate to the infantry? Specifically, about this part, I’ll say the following: when they were given under the Air Force the guys there and the combat training went up, and the raid and class, and when again under the Moreman, everything fell. They have now been reduced to a separate AE, although the materiel is almost a small regiment. Sailors supply their aircraft as a last resort, so it would be better if they were under the Air Force - the base of our SSBNs would be more reliable covered, I am sure.
      1. +8
        18 March 2018 14: 09
        Dmitry, welcome!

        The fact that they have materiel on a whole regiment, that's for sure ...
        But not modernized, old stuff ...
        The sailors seem to have agreed to upgrade to BSM, and the guys should go for retraining ...
        Let's see how it grows together ...
        I have odnokans there ...
        1. +2
          18 March 2018 18: 56
          Hey. Well, God forbid, of course, the Pacific Fleet is weak in all respects, both in ships and in aviation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"