New Russian weapons called the threat of all life on Earth

105
A new horror story for the western man published a publication Business Insider. In her, some researcher of the effects of nuclear weapons Stephen Schwartz claims that the new Russian Status-6 underwater drone, which is capable of carrying a nuclear charge on board, is a cobalt bomb and can turn entire continents into lifeless territories.

New Russian weapons called the threat of all life on Earth




Schwartz argues that, unlike in Russia, the US nuclear weapons are intended only for the destruction of weapons of mass destruction in the territory of the enemy, while the charges are detonated in the air, and the shock wave becomes a striking factor. As a result, the city over which the explosion was carried out will be almost completely destroyed, but radioactive contamination will be minimal. At the same time, according to rumors, “Status-6” will not only detonate in the water column, but also contain cobalt-59. As a result of neutron capture, this isotope will turn into radioactive cobalt-60.

Dust and particles of water containing cobalt-60 can be carried by the wind thousands of kilometers from the epicenter of the explosion. If the "Status-6" explodes near Washington, then radioactive fallout is likely to fall in Canada and Mexico. In this case, it will take more than 50 years for the intensity of ionizing radiation to return to background values. According to Schwarz, for all this time any contaminated areas will be unsuitable for life. People who take shelter under the ground, when trying to get to the surface will be subjected to deadly doses of radiation.

According to Business Insider, American nuclear weapons are being developed to pinpoint strategic targets with minimal side damage.

According to US intelligence data presented by The Washington Free Beacon, the new Russian weapons were tested on 27 on November 2016 from the Sarov submarine. "Status-6" has a range of 10 thousands of kilometers, maximum speed - above 56 nodes, the depth of immersion - up to a kilometer. The weapon is attributed to two main striking factors: the creation of a tsunami and radiation pollution, reports "Lenta.ru"
  • First channel
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    16 March 2018 13: 54
    They even have more democratic weapons:
    unlike Russian, US nuclear weapons are intended only to destroy weapons of mass destruction on enemy territory

    Well, Americans, such a thing, devil horned. Their weapons are not harmful to decent, democratically minded people. Their American radiation sidesteps. Oh, grandmothers, I’ll mess up with laughter.
    1. +44
      16 March 2018 13: 55
      The president, it seems, clearly said that we do not need a world without Russia))
      So, do not bother to speculate.
      1. +18
        16 March 2018 14: 07
        can turn entire continents into lifeless territories.

        Not continents, but continent. One small but hefty harmful and stinky CONTINENT. All other continents will benefit from this. But they are afraid in vain, we can do it differently. smile
        1. 0
          16 March 2018 14: 21
          Quote: Monos
          can turn entire continents into lifeless territories.

          Not continents, but continent. One small but hefty harmful and stinky CONTINENT. All other continents will benefit from this. But they are afraid in vain, we can do it differently. smile

          You forgot about England.
          1. +2
            16 March 2018 15: 05
            Naglia without the usa is not significant. Well, by and large, if you do not look at the "expert" ravings, you do not have to offend us and everything will be fine with you. Otherwise .... the answer will be surely and definitely fatal!
            1. +1
              16 March 2018 15: 42
              Quote: volodimer
              Naglia without the usa is not significant.


              I agree, let them continue to do whiskey, do no more harm from them,
              and musicians who are retired there, and some still perform, feel sorry

              -----------------------------

              Another gentleman from the British parliament floated — they began to count how much Putin had stolen.

              They argue, roofing felts 3 billion, or 30, or even 300
            2. +1
              16 March 2018 17: 53
              Here the main question is whether the Russian leadership will have enough decisiveness for a lethal answer. So far, our "partners" (who have found partners) seem confident that there will not be enough. Syria seems to show how far we are ready to go. If the impact of amers and others like them in Baghdad take place ....
              1. ZVO
                +2
                16 March 2018 19: 25
                Quote: Topotun
                Here the main question is whether the Russian leadership will have enough decisiveness for a lethal answer. So far, our "partners" (who have found partners) seem confident that there will not be enough. Syria seems to show how far we are ready to go. If the impact of amers and others like them in Baghdad take place ....


                Russians have too much love for children.
                Putin’s children live and raise their children abroad.
                Children of Lavrov - live abroad.
                Millon's children of critically important officials, businessmen and other power-holders live abroad.

                It would be strange if they thought otherwise ...
                By the way, what does the hat-making Hrych write in response in essence or does the Crap freeze again?
              2. +3
                16 March 2018 19: 33
                To the "perimeter" will and determination are not needed. This system is decisive by definition. smile
                1. +2
                  16 March 2018 23: 01
                  Quote: Monos
                  To the "perimeter" will and determination are not needed. This system is decisive by definition.

                  That ama called her fly-in "AMORAL"! No less, however!
              3. 0
                17 March 2018 10: 17
                Quote: Topotun
                Here the main question is whether the Russian leadership will have enough decisiveness for a lethal answer. So far, our "partners" (who have found partners) seem confident that there will not be enough. Syria seems to show how far we are ready to go. If the attack on Amer and others like them in Baghdad takes place ....
                What does Baghdad have to do with it? If not a secret, of course. As you did not throw in Tripoli, with such a level of analytics.
                1. +1
                  19 March 2018 10: 33
                  I apologize, Damascus meant. When in a hurry (and there is no time, you also need to work), sometimes you miss ...
          2. +1
            16 March 2018 15: 23
            Well, it’s difficult to call it a continent, for example, an island there is just one “yars”, but Australia is quite possible ...
        2. +9
          16 March 2018 14: 30
          Finally, they talked about real things, otherwise all sorts of greens on the CIA’s suction convinced everyone of the apocalyptic consequences of nuclear exchanges, carried the blizzard of a nuclear winter, etc. The whole point was to achieve nuclear disarmament of Russia, and without it they would trample on our huge homeland from all sides NATO, Chinese, Japanese and Islamists, who will trample a billion from the west, a billion from the east, a billion from the south. With our perfect strategic nuclear forces and tactical nuclear weapons, we don’t care how many of them, the question is how much meat is fried. Almost 90% or more of nuclear explosions will be airborne nuclear explosions, not because they are the most environmentally friendly, but the most effective in terms of radius of destruction. Only during the tests 2 and a half thousand nuclear charges were blown up and nothing happened to the Earth, the same winter, but one volcano throws dirt into the stratosphere more than all bombs, all the more so air explosions do not raise dust into the stratosphere. Finally, they let it slip that the planet’s weapons are not harmful, yes to states and megalopolises, and the planet becomes cleaner, these megalopolises mess up nature every second, dump tons of feces, etc. But it must be admitted that Status-6 is really harmful, Freemasons cannot get out shelters in a month and become gods for the remaining troglodytes (as they planned), for hundreds of years the continents will fonit wassat
        3. 0
          16 March 2018 16: 08
          Monos to your video
          Victor is not worth it and we are not taken into account. In case of aggression, I will pick up a weapon to protect children and granddaughters. And at least one, but I’ll take it with me. And with good luck and skills and more
          1. +2
            16 March 2018 17: 42
            Quote: AleksPol
            In case of aggression, I will pick up a weapon to protect children and granddaughters.

            In which case, everyone will stand under the gun, but the first blow will be taken by the personnel army.
          2. ZVO
            0
            16 March 2018 19: 21
            Quote: AleksPol
            Monos to your video
            Victor is not worth it and we are not taken into account. In case of aggression, I will pick up a weapon to protect children and granddaughters. And at least one, but I’ll take it with me. And with good luck and skills and more


            And what will you do against aviation?
            For almost 50 years there have been no infantry battles ...
            1. 0
              17 March 2018 10: 29
              Quote: ZVO
              And what will you do against aviation? For almost 50 years there have been no infantry battles ...
              And what will they do against our nuclear weapons? Very inhumane, by the way.
        4. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. +4
                      16 March 2018 22: 50
                      Hmm, in the topic about cons I voted "I do not care", but after the comrade ZVO I realized that I was wrong ... we need to return the cons. At least somehow in a gray faded color, paint a self-confident nonsense. Talking about cobalt, as if opened it))
                      1. +4
                        17 March 2018 01: 20
                        Quote: Voyager
                        Hmm, in the topic about cons I voted "I do not care", but after the comrade ZVO I realized that I was mistaken ... we must return the cons.

                        laughing Similarly. One to one. good
      2. +14
        16 March 2018 14: 09
        You can be chained to death. Humane American nuclear weapons.
        Mattresses you tell your crap to your mothers.
        Hiroshima, Nagasaki ....

        Tell the old women about the humane napalm.

        Ghouls.

        Scary is not a weapon, but those people who have it in their hands. Europeans and mattresses (the same Europeans living now in the territories of the peoples that they destroyed) for centuries destroyed people. Thousands and millions killed. Destroyed by entire nations.
        PADLES they and Ghouls.
      3. +4
        16 March 2018 14: 10
        That's what I thought ... If we are trying to make Babu Yaga out of us in every possible way, maybe we can become her for half an hour ?! Or to make it easier to understand - Boogeyman ?!
        1. +3
          16 March 2018 14: 14
          Quote: Zhelezyakin
          of us are trying in every possible way to make Babu Yaga, maybe we can become it, for half an hour ?! Or to make it easier to understand - Boogeyman ?!

          You watch a lot of Amer films with Keanu Reeves. "John WEC" is a film, albeit a good one, interesting, peculiar, but you don’t need to poke it here.
          1. +3
            16 March 2018 14: 18
            Maybe I’m watching (you seem to be too;)), but the essence of what was said is not that. They demonize us, but not one of the adversaries thinks about what could happen if Russia really becomes a country violating the world order and undermining the foundations of security ...
            1. +5
              16 March 2018 14: 20
              I agree, they are trying to blame Russia for what they themselves would have done, had it not been for the Russian Federation. Therefore, they are angry that we interfere.
      4. +4
        16 March 2018 14: 22
        Well, at the expense of Co-59, the guys bent, horribly caught up, of course, since no one had tested charges with such a substance and is a purely theoretical modification of weapons of mass destruction.
        When using this warhead for 6-7 months, all life on Earth will disappear .....
        1. +2
          16 March 2018 21: 55
          I think so too. There you can do without cobalt.
          I wonder if it is possible to make 100 torpedoes with smaller charges instead of a 5 megatons monster. It’s enough to sail the UAV along the coast of the likely enemy and fire one torpedo at the most significant targets. Damage will be greater than one powerful ammunition in one place. hi
      5. +1
        16 March 2018 15: 25
        Quote: maxim947
        The president, it seems, clearly said that we do not need a world without Russia))

        There will be no peace without Russia, since if we remove the RF from these scales, then the power parity will be greatly violated and the world will simply be covered with a copper basin. We will use weapons based on the defense doctrine, not offensive, that is, only in response.
        And the screams from behind the puddles will only increase, because “they don’t have methods against Kostya Soprykin.” (From the movie “The meeting place cannot be changed”)
      6. +1
        17 March 2018 11: 29
        maxim947
        The president, it seems, clearly said that we do not need a world without Russia))
        That's it. And in general, Americans and the British are far from the whole earthly life laughing
    2. +6
      16 March 2018 14: 07
      For example, Dresden was destroyed along with hundreds of thousands of residents exclusively ecologically clean bombs
      1. +2
        16 March 2018 14: 09
        Quote: Dormidont
        For example, Dresden was destroyed along with hundreds of thousands of residents exclusively environmentally friendly bombs

        In Japan, cities destroyed by lighters
        1. +2
          16 March 2018 14: 16
          You can continue the list. For example, OWLs that the United States never destroyed are also environmentally friendly products - they do not leave any radioactive contamination, as well as no excess blood, damage and dust ..
        2. 0
          16 March 2018 15: 26
          In Vietnam, rivers were poisoned with pure "orange" good
          1. ZVO
            0
            16 March 2018 19: 35
            Quote: Incvizitor
            In Vietnam, rivers were poisoned with pure "orange" good


            The rivers are not destroyed - do not lie.
            Orange burned openings in the jungle to control the movement of "their enemy."
            I dare to assure. that if we needed such a goal, then we would do the same.
            For the safety of our soldiers is much higher than some kind of jungle ...
    3. +1
      16 March 2018 14: 15
      Yes, let them scare, this is not new for them. They are afraid, then respected. Who respected the United States if they were not afraid? winked
      1. +3
        16 March 2018 14: 20
        Americans didn’t read all the fans and actors from the VO forum - so they would know that these are all cartoons shown by Putin to cheer up the local electorate

        1. ZVO
          +1
          16 March 2018 19: 42
          Quote: c-Petrov
          Americans didn’t read all the fans and actors from the VO forum - so they would know that these are all cartoons shown by Putin to cheer up the local electorate


          What is all-crawler?

          Do you know that the "Pessimist" is just an "uninformed Optimist"?
          those. in common language - a moron - this is nothing in this life that does not understand a fool .. He does not know. what is cobalt-60 ...
          doesn't think about that. what is nuclear war.
          does not understand. what is cold and hunger
          Well, he's just so stupid. that can’t look any further. Just a little further ...

          I hate America. I hate Europe, I hate Arabs ...
          But I do not want war.
          The very one - with which you all sing praises. Mlyn ...
          I saw a local war.
          Believe me - global is another.
          This is not partisanism - there will be no karamultuk.
          here, either the Kyrgyz Republic will be cast, casting the whole world into the Stone Age, or they will completely knock it down. The world in the sense. And I want to understand my grandchildren.
          And if there is war again, then I will have to get under arms. unlike most local idiots, supposedly far beyond retirement age.
          indeed, the brain liquefies over the years.
    4. +3
      16 March 2018 14: 18
      “Democratic weapons of the USA and their coalitions” - IRAN AND YUGOSLAVIA!

      Dr. Chris Busby, a member of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, is studying the effects of using depleted uranium.
      “” “When we arrived in Fallujah,” says Chris Busby, “we found there an elevated level of congenital malformations and cancer. We began to examine parents who had children with congenital malformations. "We took samples of their hair to understand what genotoxic substances can be in them and lead to the development of congenital defects, and we discovered uranium in them."
      Contact with uranium leads to serious genetic damage and also causes cancer. Thus, all traces lead to uranium. Its only source could be uranium weapons, which were used by the forces of the US-led coalition. “They used not only depleted uranium, but, as it later became known, poorly enriched uranium ..” ”


      The United States and its NATO partners widely used depleted uranium ammunition during the 1999 aggression against Yugoslavia.
      When such a projectile or rocket hits the target, dust is formed containing uranium oxide, which is extremely dangerous for human health. It affects the kidneys, the immune system and causes cancer.
      Shortly after the aggression against Yugoslavia, there was an outbreak of leukemia among the Italian troops participating in the peacekeeping contingent in Kosovo.
      Map of depleted uranium strikes in Yugoslavia
    5. 0
      16 March 2018 15: 03
      C'mon, just the strait between Mexico and Canada will be all ...
    6. +2
      16 March 2018 15: 19
      They would be silent ..
      "March 16, 1968, 50 years ago, soldiers of the Charlie company of the 1st battalion of the 20th infantry regiment of the US Army entered the Vietnamese village of Songmi and completely destroyed it. 504 civilians were killed."
    7. Maz
      0
      16 March 2018 16: 25
      And Israeli weapons and their advisers serve only to destroy terrorists, made under license and in close cooperation with the United States laughing
    8. 0
      16 March 2018 16: 36
      NATO is not all life on earth. Without them, the air on earth will become cleaner even with a dose of radiation.
    9. +1
      16 March 2018 18: 03
      Quote: Crowe
      Well, Americans, such a thing, devil horned. Their weapons are not harmful to decent, democratically minded people. Their American radiation sidesteps.

      Yeah. The Japanese still do not know how to "thank" these "little rascals" for the "safe" bombing of Hiroshima m Nagasaki.
      1. +2
        16 March 2018 18: 14
        So many young Japanese people think that they were bombed by Russians.
      2. ZVO
        0
        16 March 2018 19: 43
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Quote: Crowe
        Well, Americans, such a thing, devil horned. Their weapons are not harmful to decent, democratically minded people. Their American radiation sidesteps.

        Yeah. The Japanese still do not know how to "thank" these "little rascals" for the "safe" bombing of Hiroshima m Nagasaki.

        And?
        Where are the attempts of terrorist attacks against America by the Japanese?
        Where is the gap in diplomatic relations?

        Do you really believe. in what you write?

        How much do you get paid for such an extravagant text?
        1. +3
          16 March 2018 21: 17
          Quote: ZVO
          And?
          Where are the Japanese attacks on terrorist attacks against America? Where is the severance of diplomatic relations? Do you really believe. in what you write? How much do they pay you for such an extravagant text?
          You understand a foreigner, in Russian and spelling the quotation marks do not fulfill the function of "decor", but mean the opposite meaning. If you read “I Love,” the word in quotation marks means “I would kill the fuck.” Therefore, if you return to my comment and read it again, you will find the word "thank" taken in quotation marks, which means "how to punish." The Japanese are a disciplined nation, the emperor said to endure - endure. As for payment, check the balance of your card. I transferred to her exactly as much as I was paid.
    10. 0
      17 March 2018 10: 09
      Quote: Crowe
      Their American radiation sidesteps.

      It is necessary to remind these non-star-striped men, often to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Moreover, to remind publicly and from the stands of the UN. Better yet, to show a film about the consequences of their use of atomic bombs in these cities. Directly at the UN to organize an exhibition about the atrocities of their military in Vietnam, the use of napalm and "Orange 5" for civilians.
  2. +5
    16 March 2018 13: 55
    The threat of all life on Earth is the USA !!! There will be no USA - there will not be in the World of Wars !!! am
    1. +7
      16 March 2018 13: 59
      Quote: keeper03
      The threat of all life on Earth is the USA !!! There will be no USA - there will not be in the World of Wars !!! am

      Anglo-Saxons.
      Damn, they’re really “exceptional”.
      According to Business Insider, American nuclear weapons are being developed to pinpoint strategic targets with minimal side damage.

      Yes ... a mushroom over Moscow is a strategic object with a "minimal" collateral of several tens of millions of lives, and hundreds of cities are under the gun .... and these frostbitten ones are talking about undemocratic weapons? ...
      Ugh on them.
  3. +3
    16 March 2018 13: 57
    let me guess for myself, piss with fear, then maybe for ordinary townsfolk in Pindo @ these settle in the head the idea that it’s better not to touch us
    1. +2
      16 March 2018 14: 08
      It seems to me that ordinary people do not speak on television and do not give interviews in newspapers. DIFFICULT people write laws in them and impose sanctions! It is necessary that these UNSENSEs have no desire to yap.
  4. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 05
    May our Western and Middle Eastern partners tremble with fear
  5. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 05
    Fear syki, be afraid !!!
  6. +1
    16 March 2018 14: 05
    We are so angry, it’s better not to touch us .......................
  7. +5
    16 March 2018 14: 06
    Hiroshima and Nagasaki somehow vividly showed "point destruction", before that there was "point destruction" of Hamburg and Dresden, "point destruction" - of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya. The list of this can go on for a very long time.
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      16 March 2018 16: 21
      Yes Komrad, you can’t say better! sad
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        16 March 2018 23: 41
        Friend / or not friend /, I don’t quite understand what you want. Find out the truth, I will not help you. Try searching between the lines.
        Representatives of the TEPCO company, which is the operator of the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant, admitted today that the data on the radiation surge at the station’s 2nd nuclear reactor are “erroneous” and “overestimated.” Data on which the level of radiation in the water accumulated in the lower part of the turbine hall of the 2nd reactor turned out to be higher than the norm in 10 million timeswere misinterpreted, said the station operator.
        “These are not trustworthy figures,” said Takashi Kurita, a spokesman for the Tokyo-based energy company serving the plant. “We are sorry.” Http://www.newsru.com/world/27mar2011/yod.
        html
        According to her, when measuring the level of radiation, experts mixed up the content of iodine isotopes in water and cobalt. New data on the actual radiation level at the 2nd power unit will be provided in the very near future. "Publication date: March 27, 2011, 17:47 | last updated: December 7, 2017, 08:56
        / let iodine be shmobalt for you /
        “But the appearance of cobalt-58 in seawater can mean anything. Starting from the fact that the corium melted the walls and went outside (along with the cobalt accumulated inside the reactor), and ending with the simple version that cobalt is simply washed out of the deposits into some something far pipe. "http://forum.atominfo.ru/index.php?showto
        pic = 575 & st = 1208
        but on this forum / if you do not trust Vrunyus / like me by the way / you can find out in detail about how I / in your opinion / bzdy.
  9. +4
    16 March 2018 14: 08
    Humanitarian bombing of nuclear weapons has already appeared! Background: Status-6 is an unlawful response to a humanitarian bombardment using nuclear weapons of reduced power, oh, these bad Russians, they decided to infect the whole of America with cobalt, and they trained on Skripal! So I want to remember our main diplomat, d ..... b ... b!
    1. +4
      16 March 2018 14: 45
      Quote: Hammer 75
      So I want to remember our main diplomat, d ..... b ... b!

      They don’t let us forget it even for a minute. Around some DB.
  10. +4
    16 March 2018 14: 08
    Well, yes, what the United States offers is only for the destruction of Russia, and Russia offers the United States + their allies ... Terrible weapons !!!
    So guys, or all together, or no one!
    So-so on their faces in their arrogant Saxon and chop.
    Tercium non datum !!!
  11. 0
    16 March 2018 14: 10
    "we have such devices but we won’t tell you about them"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=23&am
    p; am
    p; v = RCuHE5niNfA
  12. 0
    16 March 2018 14: 11
    Dudes, don't be afraid. We are holding them on for now.
  13. +3
    16 March 2018 14: 15
    I recall the "neutron bomb", which mattresses also touted as "humane." There is no explosion, but everything is infected ... As you do not listen to them, even a tear is welling up, what humanists they are.
    1. +1
      16 March 2018 15: 04
      They frightened us with a neutron and said, “Let’s drop the bomb, all material assets will survive, and people will die ....”
      But then the USSR promised to drop 50 warrant officers into the states and said, “Let’s drop it, all people will survive, but material assets .... request laughing
  14. +5
    16 March 2018 14: 15
    Well, in general, as usual - conjecture is taken and the “horror of the layman” is promoted Well, for the appetizer, the patriotic conclusions for the same layman — our weapon is a humane light sword, and the damned Russians have a bloody hatred ax ... Another, demanded “in the moment”, rave..
  15. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 16
    US nuclear weapons are intended only to destroy weapons of mass destruction on the territory of the enemy, while the charges detonate in the air, and the shock wave becomes a destructive factor. As a result, the city over which the explosion was carried out will be almost completely destroyed, however, radioactive pollution will be minimal.
    American nuclear weapons are the most humane nuclear weapons in the world !!! Because it is American!
  16. 0
    16 March 2018 14: 19
    I was glad for Russia if she had even cleaned her radioactive waste in Murmansk, otherwise Norway and other NATO countries are paying for it, it’s worth it to start beating, look, and the bi neighbors have respect. Nadeyatsa that all intimidate all the same is stupid. There is a Russian nice saying about a tricky ass and a bolt
    1. +6
      16 March 2018 14: 29
      Quote: Vitauts
      I’m glad for Russia if she even cleaned her radioactive waste in Murmansk

      And nevertheless, I drove him to the dancing slots of Yuyuyurmaly, vseravnooo kivin there is no longer booooooooood, a new wave of aoooooo!
    2. +2
      16 March 2018 14: 30
      We clean the Arctic ..... constantly we check all oil rigs in terms of ecology, and something like zero attention to these specific actions in the field of general environmental safety.

      But you "respect" it, you generally said funny, ..... when I tie my shoelaces or go about my business, they respect me or not from the high bell tower. !
      So I think, and many in Our country - what is your respect? You would begin to respect yourself ..... constantly under the mattresses ....
      and what does Norway pay for there?
      1. +1
        16 March 2018 14: 38
        Norway pays for the disposal of Russian decommissioned submarines of boats, so as not to cause environmental disaster, this is at least 10 years old.
        1. +4
          16 March 2018 14: 45
          Listen well with all due respect ..... well, that you are attached to these recycled submarines, well, pay (I won’t even take a word) and pay further, and the world will become cleaner and more beautiful thanks to you ...... what is required of Russia in your opinion? Beating his head on the floor in a fit of shame? So this will not happen! and don’t wait.

          Continue to pay and how do you protect the world.
          And Russia is not going anywhere, we are huge, and we have something in the world everywhere. wink
        2. ZVO
          +2
          16 March 2018 19: 53
          Quote: Vitauts
          Norway pays for the disposal of Russian decommissioned submarines of boats, so as not to cause environmental disaster, this is at least 10 years old.


          Not my friend ...
          not an enemy. namely, not a friend .. These are different things ... So far ... different.

          Taxes are paid - we are in the know.
          But you don’t know why.
          They don’t talk about it.
          For there was a deal in Svalbard.
          We give them part of the land and sea - they give us money for recycling.
          So learn to understand what is in reality.

          They do not make the world cleaner - they pay for their purchase of Svalbard.
          Although they hide behind a fucking philanthropy.
          This is all your fucking Europe - you're lying.
          You are white - call black. you mask your purchases with "humanistic values."
          Although there is no humanism in your affairs.

          simplest analogy. what do you understand.

          You hired a person to clean your septic tank (aka the toilet) from shit.
          Ukrainian came.
          He counted everything and you paid him.
          But you think and paid for all the news that you made a contribution to helping Ukraine protect against an external enemy - Russia.

          Do you understand the idea?

          But the thing is to clean the shit ...
    3. SOF
      +2
      16 March 2018 14: 48
      Quote: Vitauts
      I was glad for Russia if she had even cleaned her radioactive waste in Murmansk, otherwise Norway and other NATO countries are paying for it, it’s worth it to start beating, look, and the bi neighbors have respect. Nadeyatsa that all intimidate all the same is stupid. There is a Russian nice saying about a tricky ass and a bolt

      ... this is our saying - apply it to us. So ... try to keep your ass unsophisticated and may the bolt not come with you.
      P.S. Are you going to release your fascists like veterans and young shoots again?
    4. +4
      16 March 2018 14: 55
      And on the bolt there is an ass with nooks ... learn proverbs.
    5. +2
      16 March 2018 15: 29
      look and the bi neighbors respect

      We respect from the National American Terrorist Organization does not need for us this semblance of ISIS.
  17. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 24
    Yes, you need to spit on all these nonsense,
    And do everything just as Russia needs it! We need to make a cobalt bomb, although we also have thermonuclear weapons more powerful and reliable than the American one.
  18. +1
    16 March 2018 14: 32
    if this thing simulates marine animals, it’s hard to detect
  19. +3
    16 March 2018 14: 40
    US nuclear weapons are intended only to destroy weapons of mass destruction on enemy territory,

    The new Russian Status-6 underwater drone, which is capable of carrying a nuclear charge on board, is a “cobalt bomb” and can turn entire continents into lifeless territories.

    This is our life - an unjust thing. Ce la vie.
  20. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 44
    Well, of course, the United States has peaceful bombs and kills only the elite, but Russian bombs are bad. hypocritical creatures
  21. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 54
    Well duck do not wake famously while it is quiet.
  22. +2
    16 March 2018 14: 54
    American radiation only slightly tickles the nostrils with a light floral aroma. And the creatures of darkness from Mordor, you tfu, made a reservation - all continents are ready to poison from Russia. That would continue to be handy to drink the blood of infants, gays, lesbians and God forgive me, transgender people. Here is such a world politics. And we live in it. And it’s funny and scary ...
  23. +1
    16 March 2018 15: 00
    Yes, let them invent horror stories for themselves - they’ll throw themselves faster from the windows.
  24. +3
    16 March 2018 15: 08
    US nuclear weapons are being developed to target strategic targets with minimal collateral damage.
    Of course, after all, itching to destroy your hands so that you could use the resources in the very near future.
    But when the application is planned solely for reciprocal purposes, then the greater the consequences, the better.
  25. +2
    16 March 2018 15: 20
    and can turn entire continents into lifeless territories.

    Well, North America will definitely not be amiss, let it be better to become a desert than a world-class terrorist organization.
  26. +1
    16 March 2018 15: 31
    Tremble, the devils are striped!
  27. +2
    16 March 2018 15: 48
    Quote: mavrus
    I recall the "neutron bomb", which mattresses also touted as "humane." There is no explosion, but everything is infected ... As you do not listen to them, even a tear is welling up, what humanists they are.

    You are not right. The explosion was just there, but there was no infection, as from nuclear weapons. Living destroyed by neutron radiation.

    Back in those years there was a mystery: What is the difference between warrant officers and neutron blmb
    Response
    When a neutron bomb explodes, all life disappears and material values ​​remain
    When warrant officers appear, all living things remain, but material values ​​disappear
  28. +3
    16 March 2018 15: 53
    Yeah, i.e. the mattresses have humane, democratic weapons, and Russia has barbaric weapons?
    It reminds a joke, they say, before shooting, they must smear their head with green))
  29. +2
    16 March 2018 16: 29
    A weapon cannot be humane - it kills
  30. +1
    16 March 2018 16: 52
    What nonsense from Lenta.ru - “Status-6” with a nuclear reactor has an unlimited cruising range and a speed of 100 knots at a depth of 1000 meters.

    Judging by the size of the Status-6 thermonuclear warhead (1,5x6 m, Kuzkina’s mother N.S. Khrushchev), its capacity is about 100 Mt provided that the third stage is made of uranium-238, and not cobalt-59.
  31. +1
    16 March 2018 17: 11
    Quote: Vitauts
    I was glad for Russia if she had even cleaned her radioactive waste in Murmansk, otherwise Norway and other NATO countries are paying for it, it’s worth it to start beating, look, and the bi neighbors have respect.

    ---------------------------------
    I would be glad for Germany, which in the Baltic Sea has reliably sunk its chemical weapons and everything is shiito-covered, and the cans are rusting.
    1. +2
      17 March 2018 00: 48
      Quote: Altona
      I would be glad for Germany, which in the Baltic Sea reliably sank its chemical weapons ...
      Germany has done a lot of bad things ... That's for sure. But Germany, defeated in WWII, has nothing to do with the flooding of the Chemical Ammunition in Baltics:
      According to reports, a chemical weapon discovered in West Germany, American and British occupation forces were flooded in four areas of the coastal waters of Western Europe. In the Norwegian deep water near Rental; in Skagerrak near the Swedish port of Lucechil; between the Danish island of Funen and the mainland; near Skagen, the extreme northern point of Denmark. In total, in six areas of the European water area, 302 875 tons of toxic substances lie on the seabed, or approximately 1 / 5 of the total stock of OM. In addition, at least 120 thousand tons of chemical weapons are flooded in unidentified places in the Atlantic Ocean and in the western part of the English Channel, and at least 25 thousand tons were transported to the USSR.
      Soviet military archives contain detailed information about what was discovered in the chemical arsenals of East Germany and flooded in the Baltic Sea:
      - 71469 250-kg bombs equipped with mustard gas,
      - 14258 250-kg and 500-kg air bombs equipped with chloroacetophene, diphenylchloroarsin and arsine oil and 50-kg air bombs equipped with adamite,
      - 408565 artillery shells of caliber 75mm, 105 mm and 150 mm, loaded with mustard gas,
      - 34592 chemical mines of 20 kg and 50 kg loaded with mustard gas,
      - 10420 chemical smoke mines caliber 100 mm,
      - 1004 technological tanks containing 1506 tons of mustard gas,
      - 8429 barrels containing 1030 tons of adamsite and diphenylchloroarsine,
      - 169 tons of poisonous process tanks containing cyanide salt, chlorarsin, cyanarsin and axelsarsin ...
  32. +1
    16 March 2018 17: 14
    Americans can dig into the ground today.
  33. 0
    16 March 2018 17: 25
    Schwartz claims US nuclear weapons are safe! Further reading is not worth it ................
  34. SAF
    0
    16 March 2018 18: 39
    Quote: To be or not to be
    They would be silent ..
    "March 16, 1968, 50 years ago, soldiers of the Charlie company of the 1st battalion of the 20th infantry regiment of the US Army entered the Vietnamese village of Songmi and completely destroyed it. 504 civilians were killed."

    These CREATURES are under 80.
    If only one of them had been burned and they felt ... 504 ... KILLED ... just like that ...
  35. +1
    16 March 2018 19: 07
    Do not forget: the main threat to life on Earth is the United States and, in general, Western "civilization"!
  36. +1
    16 March 2018 20: 12
    Quote: ZVO
    Quote: AleksPol
    Monos to your video
    Victor is not worth it and we are not taken into account. In case of aggression, I will pick up a weapon to protect children and granddaughters. And at least one, but I’ll take it with me. And with good luck and skills and more


    And what will you do against aviation?
    For almost 50 years there have been no infantry battles ...

    How many impolite people got divorced in VO, I wouldn’t turn to you to a stranger.
    I meant the invasion, especially not far from us hi
  37. 0
    16 March 2018 22: 35
    That is, weapons of mass destruction is a CITY? headquarters?
  38. 0
    16 March 2018 23: 02
    how many idle expeditions ... rave
  39. +1
    16 March 2018 23: 25
    Well, then you do not meddle with us and do not apply then.
    And then damn their bombs are democratic and healthy,
    and ours are all so totalitarian and harm our health. ...
  40. +3
    17 March 2018 02: 46
    The USA is a source of evil and chaos.
    The Americans are our enemies, they understand only the language of power and cruel pressure, and on this basis, we must conduct our business with them. Therefore, such weapons must be used against them - this will be a boon to the rest of humanity.
  41. +1
    17 March 2018 12: 02
    I read the article. All clear.
    It became even calmer in my soul!
    Let all g .., yapping around the perimeter!
  42. 0
    17 March 2018 13: 15
    Quote: ZVO
    Quote: Topotun
    Here the main question is whether the Russian leadership will have enough decisiveness for a lethal answer. So far, our "partners" (who have found partners) seem confident that there will not be enough. Syria seems to show how far we are ready to go. If the impact of amers and others like them in Baghdad take place ....


    Russians have too much love for children.
    Putin’s children live and raise their children abroad.
    Children of Lavrov - live abroad.
    Millon's children of critically important officials, businessmen and other power-holders live abroad.

    It would be strange if they thought otherwise ...
    By the way, what does the hat-making Hrych write in response in essence or does the Crap freeze again?

    Have you forgotten how much property, production, etc. you bought abroad, the accounts in the local banks is to bomb your own? lol hi
  43. 0
    18 March 2018 13: 22
    Interestingly, this expert was present at the tests? How did he find out about the components? Or did another “ex-colonel of the GRU” appear again?))))
  44. DK
    0
    22 March 2018 06: 22
    It must be assumed that the combined uranium shells destroying Yugoslavia, the phosphorus bombs raining down on Iraq, napalm and orange in Vietnam, the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan were extremely environmentally friendly and healthy? ;)
  45. 0
    22 March 2018 12: 06
    the threat of life is a Russian weapon, and the American is a peddler of peaceful democracy ......

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"