Military Review

Japan plans to develop potential for striking enemy bases

19
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) will prepare recommendations for the country's authorities by May with a view to developing the potential of the armed forces when attacking potential adversary bases, reports TASS message from Kyodo agency.




It is noted that it is a question of “adopting the means for a counterattack on ballistic missile launchers in case of an immediate threat to the territory of Japan”.

Party leaders also spoke in support of the government’s decision to purchase F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing aircraft in the United States and “create the first aircraft carrier in the country based on the largest Izumo helicopter carrier at the disposal of the national self-defense forces.”

In addition, the LDP reads an important increase in defense capability in space and cyberspace.

New measures are necessary, including “due to the growing threat from the DPRK and the expansion of China’s zone of activity at sea,” said Gen Nakatani, head of the party’s defense commission.

According to the agency, the Japanese government is of the opinion that the possession of a country by offensive arms "is not in conflict with the" peaceful "Constitution if it is associated with self-defense." However, the adoption of a strike carrier aircraft, for example, "will no longer comply with the provisions of the basic law," concludes the publication.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 16 March 2018 11: 59
    +5
    Straight amazing belay !!! Russia - Not among the opponents! crying Maybe they just missed it ??? sad
    1. Warrior with machine gun
      Warrior with machine gun 16 March 2018 12: 04
      +5
      they didn’t miss it, and the bikes poisoned as it should be with the Amer’s litter about the DPRK, China would have been added to Fiji here, you can see these macaques very much want to get a hammer on the head and go to the bottom together with their islands in the case of a sheher.
      1. Crowe
        Crowe 16 March 2018 12: 11
        +3
        The Japanese are dragged to the bottom of their plans. At the bottom - in the literal sense.
        Not there, the Japanese are looking for allies. Now on the other end of the continent, then on the other side of the ocean. They have a strange philosophy, not practical
    2. Pirogov
      Pirogov 16 March 2018 12: 08
      +1
      Quote: Hunter 2
      Straight amazing belay !!! Russia - Not among the opponents! crying Maybe just missed ???

      In the Amer’s training manual, Russia wasn’t in order to disguise jo.py and confuse the tracks.)
    3. gippernano
      gippernano 16 March 2018 17: 14
      +1
      Yeah, and forgot to develop the potential to strike at Japan. One! hit one! rocket.
  2. NEOZ
    NEOZ 16 March 2018 12: 07
    0
    ABOUT! decided to sacrifice Japan !!! against who? RF? China?
    1. gippernano
      gippernano 16 March 2018 17: 15
      0
      For the sake of world peace and clean air
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 16 March 2018 12: 14
    +3
    According to the agency, the Japanese government is of the opinion that the country's possession of offensive weapons "does not contradict the" peaceful "Constitution, if it is associated with self-defense." At the same time, the adoption of the strike aircraft carrier, for example, “will no longer comply with the provisions of the basic law,” concludes the publication
    And they say that only we have a law, that the drawbar - as you turn it, it happened ... laughing
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 16 March 2018 12: 33
    +1
    New measures are necessary, including “due to the growing threat from the DPRK and the expansion of China’s zone of activity at sea,” said Gen Nakatani, head of the party’s defense commission.

    I suppose R. Sorge’s students are on the spot, and we have intelligence, against whom the Ipenians are preparing rackets.
  5. gig334
    gig334 16 March 2018 12: 34
    0
    Satan alone is enough, and there is no Japan with its potential. She generally better not get involved in wars with such a tiny territory. In the 21st century, they will be erased from the face of the Earth in 5 seconds
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 16 March 2018 12: 43
      0
      Does a large area help? Million-plus cities will be destroyed, and then what?
      Villages will survive in Japan, where else ... dig potatoes or rice planted in the old fashioned way.
      1. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 16 March 2018 16: 30
        +1
        Especially villages will survive if the tsunami washed them off. This is a seismically unstable area. Even bacteria will not survive.
      2. gig334
        gig334 16 March 2018 16: 31
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Does a large area help? Million-plus cities will be destroyed, and then what?
        Villages will survive in Japan, where else ... dig potatoes or rice planted in the old fashioned way.

        It helps, it’s more difficult to destroy a big country.
  6. g1washntwn
    g1washntwn 16 March 2018 13: 23
    0
    Japan silent creeps creeps from self-defense forces to full-fledged shock formations. I’m not even surprised if I guess who specifically thought of it and will help her with this.
  7. ventel
    ventel 16 March 2018 13: 29
    0
    Well, as I wrote a year ago, that Japan, due to the connection with the DPRK's nuclear program, will increase military spending so it came true. Although here on the site there were people who, in addition to memorized words and slogans such as American puppets or erase one rocket, can’t say more. And I am very interested in reading those who shout that America’s policy in the Asia-Pacific region has been blown away. I like how the United States makes politics on a global scale quietly unnoticed and there is a result.
    1. gig334
      gig334 16 March 2018 16: 32
      0
      Quote: ventel
      Well, as I wrote a year ago, that Japan, due to the connection with the DPRK's nuclear program, will increase military spending so it came true. Although here on the site there were people who, in addition to memorized words and slogans such as American puppets or erase one rocket, can’t say more. And I am very interested in reading those who shout that America’s policy in the Asia-Pacific region has been blown away. I like how the United States makes politics on a global scale quietly unnoticed and there is a result.

      Then read the wise guy, because of what North Korea began to develop nuclear weapons
      1. ventel
        ventel 16 March 2018 20: 38
        0
        Well, we can read, but how are we supposed to think. Based on open sources, I can assume that the development of nuclear weapons in North Korea began somewhere in the early 70s. And you guessed the vow in Beijing and Moscow, or how do you explain the fact that the SCAD missile came from Egypt and the Koreans built their missiles on the basis of this missile Hvansons. Now look where the SCAD was in service. And do you think that KIM ER SEN was a clairvoyant. Now put yourself in the place of the leadership of the USSR, because it’s obvious that the North Koreans turned to purchase a complex of weapons that can carry nuclear charges. And I don’t have to carry nonsense here that the Americans all the time thought of seizing North Korea.
  8. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 16 March 2018 16: 28
    +1
    Are these narrow-film ghouls still climbing? Is it not enough for them to shamefully defeat the Kwantung Army and the atomic bombing? Still want?
  9. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 17 March 2018 11: 25
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Villages will survive in Japan, where else ... dig potatoes or rice planted in the old fashioned way.

    Do you really think that then it will come to planting potatoes?