YuVO pilots on Su-24М worked flights at altitude 25 m above ground

The sophisticated elements of piloting on the upgraded Su-24М front-line bombers were completed by pilots of the aviation regiment of the Southern Military District, which is deployed in the Volgograd region, the press service of the district reported

The aircraft flew in pairs at low and extremely low altitudes to 25 m above the ground. Moreover, their speed was more than 1 thousand km / h

- said the head of the press service of the Southern Military District Vadim Astafyev.

Astafiev noted that all was made about 30 departures. The pilots improved the elements of maneuvering while evading the attack of a conditional enemy in the conditions of electronic suppression.

In addition, actions were taken in the event of an emergency situation due to equipment failure. Crews also learned how to put bombers on a limited space in conditions of limited visibility.

Comments

[Alexey-74]

Well done flyers. But a little sad, we understand that the age of the Su-24 has already passed ....

[Simon]

Where to go, you still need to practice your skills.

[Orionvit]

Quote: Alexey-74

century Su-24 is already gone ....

Still fly. A century of B-52, or Tu-95, too, is gone?

[KVU-NSVD]

For a long time, in Akhtubinsk, on the day of aviation, he probably watched how airplanes from a local airfield showed low-low flights over the river and in the city. An unforgettable childhood experience ...

[NKT]

Won't you make a mistake with speed?
Maybe 500 km / h?

[Cheldon]

My uncle over West Berlin with the help of this exercise on the MiG-21 demonstrators dispersed and the speed was exactly 1000 km / h

Quote: NKT

Won't you make a mistake with speed?
Maybe 500 km / h?

[NN52]

Supersound?

[Cheldon]

Yes, in supersonic, then I met somewhere in the press about this incident.

[Dr. David Livesey]

Supersound is 1230 km / h, stop lying to us about your uncle over Berlin. I think that if your notorious uncle flew over West Berlin altogether, his pants and shoulder straps would immediately be removed from him immediately after landing, even a helmet would not be allowed to take off)))

[Orionvit]

SU-24 is quite capable of supersonic, moreover, at low altitudes, for this it was created. True, I did not see Sushka, but I watched MIG-25, at supersonic sound, above the city, at low altitude. In 1986 Sensations are still those.

[iouris]

This could not be. Why write such nonsense?

[NN52]

NKT

I think they were definitely mistaken with speed ,,,
And all the rest, not specialists, just the same ...
It's a pity...

[shuravi]

And so it goes with the language:
... Yes, there were people these days ...

[320423]

and I remembered the Tu-16 flights in the north and unfortunately the catastrophe in which Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Pliev died.
“He taught us to fight,” they said about him in the regiment.
https://masterok.livejournal.com/2369791.html

[Alexey RA]

Su-24 and below flew - especially over the roads.

[shuravi]

Quote: Alexey RA

Su-24 and below flew - especially over the roads.

You watched inattentively. Especially footage over the coast.)

[groks]

Cool of course. But why do bomber pilots need such skills?

[shuravi]

Quote: groks

Cool of course. But why do bomber pilots need such skills?

At this altitude, it is difficult to use radar and even MANPADS.

[san4es]

Quote: shuravi

... At this altitude, it is difficult to use radar and even MANPADS.

[Zubr]

I’m just wondering, can these cars go like CDs with a relief copy?

[Zaurbek]

They were made for this ... Su-24M certainly can.
Automatic flight control system SAU-6.

The aircraft can be controlled via pitch, roll and course channels both by the crew and by the automatic control system SAU-6. This self-propelled gun can operate in stabilization modes of the trajectory, damping, as well as provide low-altitude flight with enveloping the terrain according to the RPS "Relief" information. The signals of the automatic control system are fed directly to the input of the hydraulic booster and electro-hydraulic units deflecting the steering surfaces. In case of failure of self-propelled guns in low-altitude flight mode, special steering units are provided in the longitudinal and lateral control systems, which ensure safe departure of the aircraft from the ground and bring it to zero roll.

[iouris]

This mode was turned off - psychophysiological stress was beyond.
It was said that during the tests somewhere near Mozdok a flat terrain with a mountain was found and the chief pilot Ilyushin went to this mountain in an “automatic machine”. His negotiations with the pilot-navigator: "Do not touch the pen! Do not touch the pen !! Do not touch the pen !!! ... Go !!"
At this time, most pilots did not trust the machine even during the approach, although everything worked, which was confirmed in combat units. I think this was due to the distrust experienced by the pilots in technology and insufficient flying (about 100 hours a year). With such a level of raid, I really do not want to trust the "piece of iron" piloting.
Interestingly, how is the flight altitude of 25 m confirmed and how long does this exercise take?

[dauria]

But why do bomber pilots need such skills?

There is an automatic envelope relief. The radar was called "Relief". A beam forward and a little down. Automation keeps the slant range constant. When the earth slopes down, the inclined range increases, the machine lowers the nose until the range along the beam decreases to normal. And vice versa. Of course, human intervention by effort on RUS takes precedence. Then in the 70s it was considered a way to break through front-line air defense. Green - "Orion", red - "Relief"

[Kamchatsky]

Well, actually they are fulfilling a flight on PMV along a linear landmark. But soon this Lafa will end with them, the season of mass aircraft chemical work will begin, and all the "petty-hoofed" aviation will take to the wing.

[shuravi]

This photo was taken from the Mi-24 cockpit.

[groks]

Hmmm. Well, they didn’t work out machine skills. And the pilots. Almost supersonic at 25 meters. He certainly doesn’t take anything. But he himself can not do anything.

[shuravi]

Quote: groks

Hmmm. Well, they didn’t work out machine skills. And the pilots. Almost supersonic at 25 meters. He certainly doesn’t take anything. But he himself can not do anything.

At such heights, only manual piloting.
And why nothing? Assault bombing, overcoming air defense zones.

[groks]

What for bombing with 25 meters ?! The bomb fuse will not work. And if it suddenly works (!) Then there will be an explosion of the aircraft. with the same success you can bomb with stones, the speed of a good projectile.
And what for manual on a pre-sound ?! The above video is not at all 1000 km / h. So the Kyrgyz Republic does not know how to fly.

[shuravi]

Quote: groks

What for bombing with 25 meters ?! The bomb fuse will not work. And if it suddenly works (!) Then there will be an explosion of the aircraft. with the same success you can bomb with stones, the speed of a good projectile.

Well, if you don’t know what an assault bombing is, then ask. And you’re just shaking the air for nothing.

And what for manual on a pre-sound ?! The above video is not at all 1000 km / h. So the Kyrgyz Republic does not know how to fly.

The most common manual piloting. The speed is subsonic and for the Su-24 is relatively low. A well-known section of the road was chosen for training; the flight itself is very short.
Much harder to fly over rough terrain.

[groks]

Those. it starts to dive at a speed of 1000 and also an altitude of 1000, drops bombs, after 3 (three!) seconds at a height of 25 it meets its bombs, and they flew in general in parallel, it certainly will not come out of a dive from 25, .... Rave!
If a pilot can fly at an altitude at which not all CRs above the sea (!) Can fly at such a speed, enveloping the relief, then this pilot will be able to dodge pistol bullets freely!
If we say that a plane can fly for several seconds in a straight line and over an almost even surface at 25 meters, then what is the point of overcoming air defense? These are some kind of meaningless show-offs.
Or is it a magazine magazine that has misinterpreted something. Or MORF again lies in the style of computer toys.

[Zaurbek]

KR is detected by air defense systems for 30 km ... during such a flight. The goal is to break through air defense at the European theater of operations, where far from everything is smooth.

[Xscorpion]

Quote: groks

What for bombing with 25 meters ?! The bomb fuse will not work. And if it suddenly works (!) Then there will be an explosion of the aircraft. with the same success you can bomb with stones, the speed of a good projectile.
And what for manual on a pre-sound ?! The above video is not at all 1000 km / h. So the Kyrgyz Republic does not know how to fly.

You have no idea about bombs. There are fuses for bombing from extremely low altitudes. Bombs cannot be dropped from a height of less than 15 meters, but this is only a possible rebound.

When high-explosive bombs are equipped with an AB-1 fuse, the minimum bombing height is horizontal. suspension of bombs - 20 m. When bombing on snow cover with a depth of more than half a meter is minimal. height for bombing with AB-1 - 50 m.

These fuses are suitable for the FAB-250-500.
Plus there are special bombs to work from such heights, but I don’t know if they are in the SU-24 nomenclature, too lazy to check.

[shuravi]

Quote: Xscorpion

Quote: groks

What for bombing with 25 meters ?! The bomb fuse will not work. And if it suddenly works (!) Then there will be an explosion of the aircraft. with the same success you can bomb with stones, the speed of a good projectile.
And what for manual on a pre-sound ?! The above video is not at all 1000 km / h. So the Kyrgyz Republic does not know how to fly.

You have no idea about bombs. There are fuses for bombing from extremely low altitudes. Bombs cannot be dropped from a height of less than 15 meters, but this is only a possible rebound.

When high-explosive bombs are equipped with an AB-1 fuse, the minimum bombing height is horizontal. suspension of bombs - 20 m. When bombing on snow cover with a depth of more than half a meter is minimal. height for bombing with AB-1 - 50 m.

These fuses are suitable for the FAB-250-500.
Plus there are special bombs to work from such heights, but I don’t know if they are in the SU-24 nomenclature, too lazy to check.

Assault bombs are used from such heights. Due to the braking parachute, they dramatically lose speed than they provide rel.

[groks]

To both Internet fighters. You not only names, but also descriptions read. I will not talk about AB, about their fuses, just for FAB-250, for example, the zone of continuous destruction of 60 meters.
Here's about Ш "FAB-500Sh high-explosive assault aerial bomb, designed to overcome air defense zones and horizontal damage from small and extremely low altitudes (100-200м)"
"Therefore, subsequently from the use of assault bombs from extremely low altitudes refuse."
Source http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/ab/fab-500sh.html

[shuravi]

Quote: groks

To both Internet fighters. You not only names, but also descriptions read. I will not talk about AB, about their fuses, just for FAB-250, for example, the zone of continuous destruction of 60 meters.
l

And it’s curious how much the Internet fighter actually dropped groks? Judging by how it was bombed here, not one.
Otherwise, I wouldn’t carry nonsense about fuses. Confusing it with the fuse response time.
And not the zone of continuous destruction is taken into account, but the radius of the expansion of fragments. And he is at the FAB-250 to 1500 meters.

Here's about Ш "FAB-500Sh high-explosive assault aerial bomb, designed to overcome air defense zones and horizontal damage from small and extremely low altitudes (100-200м)"
"Therefore, subsequently from the use of assault bombs from extremely low altitudes refuse."
Source http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/ab/fab-500sh.htm

Either the “scorer" did not understand what it was about, or he was cheating.
First, the "Corner of the sky" is the same source.
Secondly, it spoke of a special case, a ban on using a batch of assault bombs with PMV after improper storage, and not on abandoning them at all.

[groks]

none

Naturally. But the rest is probably even smaller.

Otherwise, I wouldn’t carry nonsense about fuses. Confusing it with fuse response time

Those. Can a bomb fire before dropping?

And it is at the FAB-250 up to 1500 meters.

It is very likely fun then to drop them from 25 meters.

First, the "Corner of the sky" is another source

Oh, that the first in Yandex on the topic has fallen.

WWI

? There about Afghanistan like. The quotation is given, since 100-200 are called ultra-small, and not what the MORF is lying about.

[shuravi]

Quote: groks

Naturally. But the rest is probably even smaller.

But I had to, though the maximum caliber FAB-250. (This is the limit for Mi-24)

Those. Can a bomb fire before dropping?

No.

It is very likely fun then to drop them from 25 meters.

That's for this and set the deceleration of the fuse. Or assault bombs are used. To the carrier at the time of operation out of the zone of expansion of fragments.
Assault is better, since it works instantly when touched. When the fuse slows down on dense soils, the bomb ricochets.

There about Afghanistan like. The quotation is given, since 100-200 is called ultra-small in it, and not what MORF is lying about.

Extremely small, that's all below 200 m.

[groks]

(This is the limit for Mi-24)

At a speed of 1000?

No.

Why? At what distance after detachment can the fuse blow? Well approximately. What is the reason for this? This is more likely to the second opponent, with the prehistoric AB-1. But anyway.

That's for this and set the deceleration of the fuse

Exactly for this? And what is the deceleration of a fuse? Here is a simple AB-1 as far as can be set?

Assault is better, since it works instantly when touched

In what I brought in by reference, it was written specifically about the assault, which had a big slowdown.
Slowing a fuse is generally not at all in order to let the plane topple over.

everything below 200 m.

In our case, 25 per 1000 is indicated. Why, for what, and why .... Regular Ponte Kozhugetycha?

[bober1982]

Flying at extremely low altitudes for the Su-24 is a common practice (no one else flies like that) Standard mode - altitude 50 m (set), speed 800 km / h, the mentioned 1000 km / h - they don’t fly at that speed at that speed, you can dig into the ground.
They do not choose any linear guidelines for such flights, and there are no 15-second flights either, you can fly at least before fuel is generated, the duration of the flight usually depends on the flight mission, and can reach 10-20 minutes. Such flights require increased attention and, accordingly, the load on the crew.
For combat use, assault bombs are used.
Maintaining a predetermined height of 50 m is possible only in manual mode, and it is impossible to maintain such a height, therefore the flight is actually performed at altitudes from 15 m to 50 m, taking into account that you have to bend around the terrain and obstacles, I repeat, in manual mode, this even when you don’t look at the altimeter.
All these videos of the Su-24 flights along the road are a bit of a treat, and the crews themselves like it (they always turn on the road if it is on the side), and it looks spectacular on the video.

[iouris]

There was an episode when Su-24 passed over my head at an altitude of about 50 m. This is scary. Flying over roads is hooliganism: you can provoke an accident. For such flights you need a special training ground. NATO members use Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia for such training. Residents are simply warned not to get scared.

[bober1982]

They fly along the route, these same roads are of no interest to anyone, because you cannot change the route. Hooliganism - when you pass along the roofs of houses, in such cases you need to climb a little.
When learning such flights, passage on the PMW is performed through the runway or in the aerobatic zone.

[shuravi]

Quote: iouris

There was an episode when Su-24 passed over my head at an altitude of about 50 m. This is scary. Flying over roads is hooliganism: you can provoke an accident. For such flights you need a special training ground. NATO members use Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia for such training. Residents are simply warned not to get scared.

The UTP (route) can be performed on the PMW both from take-off to landing (most often for helicopter pilots), and from AI to KPM, as well as at a certain stage of the route.
At the same time, roads and railways are chosen as linear landmarks. But it is recommended to go not above them, but if possible a little to the side.