TsOO sappers worked out demining with the help of the newest BMR-3М Vepr.

The engineers of a separate engineering compound of the Central Military District (CEC) using the latest technology have worked out the tasks of demining a minefield during exercises in Bashkiria, the press service of the district reports.

Engineers used for this a single, recently entered service model of the armored mine clearance vehicle BMR-3M based on the chassis tank T-90 With the help of new technology, passages in the minefield were made several minutes faster

- said in a statement.

The BMR-3М Vepr is a Russian armored demining vehicle based on the T-90 battle tank. The main purpose - the exploration, overcoming and clearance of minefields. Created passages during clearance in width are approximately equal to the inter-track or inter-wheel distance of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers.

It is noted that the machine is capable of making ruts with 2-800 mm width in the 870 anti-tracks minefields. The main difference between the BMR-3M chassis and the base machine is enhanced mine protection. The cabin of the crew, in which the commander’s turret is located, hatches, viewing instruments, and an installation with an anti-aircraft machine gun are located on the chassis housing. The cabin is welded from armor rolled sheets. Behind the cabin there is a platform installed to transport the trawl section. The front of the hull and deckhouse are covered with containers with dynamic protection.

Comments

[bazzbazz]

Comrade specialists, such a question is, how many explosions can such rollers withstand. And unless anti-tank mines blow this rink and damage the car itself. Or is it just against infantry mines?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: bazzbazz

Comrade specialists, such a question is, how many explosions can such rollers withstand.

For roller KMT-7 it is indicated:

- explosion resistance - up to 10 min ТМ-57 or up to 4 min ТМ-62М

[andrewkor]

At this Boar, chains should be pulled between the rollers of the mine trawl to initiate cumulative mines with antennas.

[Alexey RA]

It is noted that the machine is capable of doing 2 tracks with a width of 800-870 mm in anti-track minefields.

Of course, I wildly apologize - but what about the anti-bottom mines? Something this situation reminds me of the situation with mine-sweeping equipment in the Navy: we are preparing for the last war.

[Hermann]

Two vertical cylinders on the trawl create a magnetic field identical to the magnetic field of the tank in front of the machine, so there is a remedy against magnetic mines, I won’t tell about others.

[Dangerous]

It is unclear why so many dynamic protection hung? Simple steel armor saves from a mine explosion. Although suddenly it will fall under fire, then it makes sense

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Dangerous

It is unclear why so many dynamic protection hung?

BRM-3M is designed for reconnaissance, overcoming and mine clearing of minefields, ways of movement of military columns, the creation of passages in minefields with fire resistance of the enemy.

In short, it is the heir to the engineering minesweeper tanks. And for them, armor was extremely important - for they went first. Belton Cooper has a good description of what happens when minesweepers are knocked out.

Our brave tankers knew that their cars on a soggy minefield were doomed to certain death, and still continued the offensive. That was one of the most heroic attacks in the history of the war. 64 medium tanks moved into the first attack, and in the first 26 minutes of the battle we lost 48 vehicles. Losses among the crews in this terrible battle were appropriate ...
By sunset, the 1st task force with huge losses reached Gastenrath. In one of the columns of nineteen tanks (including the minesweeper tank), four remained by the end of the day: the remaining fifteen remained in the minefield.

[Xscorpion]

Quote: Alexey RA

It is noted that the machine is capable of doing 2 tracks with a width of 800-870 mm in anti-track minefields.

Of course, I wildly apologize - but what about the anti-bottom mines? Something this situation reminds me of the situation with mine-sweeping equipment in the Navy: we are preparing for the last war.

Quote: Herman

Two vertical cylinders on the trawl create a magnetic field identical to the magnetic field of the tank in front of the machine, so there is a remedy against magnetic mines, I won’t tell about others.

Anti-bottom mines are contact and non-contact, that is, magnetic, about which you wrote, the pass is about 6 meters, and in the case of contact mines, the pass is a little more than 3 meters, which in principle allows all types of combat vehicles to pass a trace.
Armor is needed, this machine is the first to go, and it is necessary to defend itself not only from mines. Together with anti-atomic protection it allows you to stay offline for 2 days in case of radioactive contamination of the area. Even the hull and tower are made according to a special multilayer scheme resistant to a nuclear explosion, although it is not known what power and at what distance, as well as penetrating radiation.

[Dedall]

Gentlemen, I would also propose to attach the dozer blade behind. Then, if necessary, you can turn around and move to the side of the barricade, set by the "barmaley". And in the current version, this is too highly specialized option.

[Alexander War]

Tank vs 7 kg of TNT http://gurkhan.blogspot.ru/2018/03/vs-7.html#more

[san4es]

..Hold San. Evening cinema

[Alexander War]

Healthy namesake Worse than a crime. The construction of project 20386 corvettes is a mistake.https: //timokhin-aa.livejournal.com/14555
3.html