DNR requires the return of 297 residents of the republic, held in Ukraine

5
Donetsk requires Kiev to include in the list for the exchange of 297 residents of the DPR, who are being held on the territory of Ukraine, while the Ukrainian authorities confirm the presence of only 81 prisoner, reports Interfax statement of the plenipotentiary representative of the DPR in the humanitarian subgroup Daria Morozova.



Kiev confirms that only 81 people are located on its territory. Detention still 216 Ukrainian authorities refuse to recognize. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian side is looking for around 115 people in the territory of Donbass. DNR confirmed the whereabouts of 14 of them. It must be remembered that we keep in custody only military and saboteurs, whose guilt has been proven. If a person is impressed by the Ukrainian side, and he speaks about it, we don’t imprison him. Everyone has the right to this, if he acts within the law. In this, our position is fundamentally different from the Ukrainian one. (...) Ukrainian security forces often detain older people who travel to Ukraine to receive pensions. Then these people are on the lists of prisoners prepared for the exchange,
told Morozova.

She believes that "the exchange of prisoners on the principle of" all for all ", most likely, will not be realized until the end of the military conflict." Ukraine "must first, in accordance with the Minsk agreements, adopt an amnesty law, and Ukrainian security forces must stop persecuting civilians for political reasons."

The war in the Donbass has been going on for almost four years, but at the same time Kiev refuses to fulfill its obligations. However, now it is necessary to reach an agreement on the exchange of those persons who are agreed by both parties. However, the Ukrainian proposal from February 2018, we absolutely do not like. Kiev proposes to change only six Ukrainians to 16 residents of Donbass. We want to return at least 81 people. Let's look at the result of the negotiations,
added Morozova.

As the representatives of Ukraine said in turn, Kiev is not refusing to conduct an exchange, however, “the coordination process is not quick and requires careful study.”
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    14 March 2018 11: 12
    Demand from the ducks? Take the villains in full, and then change. Only so. And list.
    1. +2
      14 March 2018 11: 20
      We have a little peasant at home ... They came to the second laziness ... Charged three hundred thousand ... Gave ... Just to break out .... And by the way, they later told him ... His brother handed over to ... He came to visit ... And before that he helped with money ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      14 March 2018 11: 33
      Have you tried to demand from the OSCE? belay This is their bread!
  2. 0
    14 March 2018 12: 15
    remembered when Ruban was detained.
    and this is the level of Medvedchuk and Ruban?
  3. 0
    14 March 2018 12: 17
    It must be remembered that we keep in custody only the military and saboteurs whose fault has been proven. If the Ukrainian side impresses a person, and he speaks about it, we don’t put him up for it. Everyone has the right to it, if he acts within the law

    Well, so are they. And according to the law, all who are needed are accused. Both sides are good here. I have not seen pro-Ukrainian rallies in Donetsk over the past years (except the last one) and I have not seen pro-Donetsk rallies in Kiev. Both sides resolutely suppress such attempts in the bud.
    If a person openly declares his position, then there will be either a law or “radicals”, or “Urkain DRG” or SBU cellars, the MGB and all that ...
    this is war. But she is supposed to blame the enemy for all the bad and expose herself in all the good.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"