Military Review

The situation in Syria as a source of the British ultimatum of Russia

86
A beautifully built system of relations between states is bursting at the seams. What we were told from the high tribunes for many decades turned out to be fiction. International treaties, agreements adopted and ratified by states, conventions and so on. It turned out that the whole история humanity is just fiction. The main laws of how there were, and remain the laws of the wolf pack. The one who is stronger is right.




You are guilty of the fact that I want to eat. Our fabulist Ivan Krylov was right. But it was written many years ago. In a completely different era. Strength is everything. But only until such time as another force appears. Equal, and maybe more. Then the place of the strong passes over to another. And the old leader goes to die. Or die on the spot.

Today, many people are anxiously following the situation in relations between Russia and the United States, Russia and the United Kingdom. Anxious because the situation is really critical. The situation, in my opinion, is akin to the famous Caribbean crisis. Washington and Moscow are really on the verge of serious events.

It is interesting in this aspect to consider the ultimatum of Britain. That arrogance and some recklessness, which showed the Prime Minister of the Kingdom. What is it? Phantom pains of a great empire or the stupidity of modern English politicians?

Alas, neither. Britain has long been the master of the fate of the world turned into a capo, working for the US administration. Prisoner of a concentration camp, who for the sake of an extra piece of bread mocks others. Mocks sometimes much tougher than the supervisor. But he has no rights and is completely dependent on the administration.

To take seriously what happened in the English Parliament, it is impossible. Ultimatum, like all the talk about the punishment of Russia, will quietly go nowhere. Investigation of the next "attempt" on the life of an English subject has already been classified. Similarly, it will happen to everything else. In the worst case, sanctions will be taken against the next group of Russians.

The main purpose of the raised hype is to divert attention from Syria. To divert attention from the confrontation between Russia and the United States in this particular region. The noise from London is just a background, a distraction. Such tactics are often used by special services.

To understand the general situation in the Syrian theater, it is enough to recall a number of preceding events.

Russia and the United States in the UN Security Council exchanged accusations of non-compliance with UN Security Council resolution 2401 on the cease-fire in Eastern Gut. The “exchange” of opinions took place in a rather acute manner on both sides.

What happened next? And then, on Monday, the United States Permanent Representative to the UN, Nikki Haley, announced the readiness of the Americans to ban Russia from inflicting air strikes in Syria. And at the same time, about the readiness, without international decisions, to strike at Syria "in connection with Asad’s failure to implement the UN Security Council resolution on a cease-fire."

Literally in parallel with these statements, the head of the Pentagon, James Mattis, spoke about the intelligence available to intelligence about the upcoming chimataks in Eastern Gut. But ... "the Pentagon has no evidence that Damascus uses chemical weapons."

At the same time, Russian diplomats at all platforms are talking about training himatacs already by militants. Moreover, on the day when Haley angrily “denounced” Al-Assad and Russia in the UN Security Council, the Russian military presented evidence of the chemical weapons production by the militants. A handicraft workshop for the manufacture of chemical weapons was found in Gute.

Probably the only honest statement about the situation in Syria was made by President Assad. "... just blackmail, usually used only as an excuse to inflict air strikes on the Syrian army." It is clear that the successes of the Syrian army, the successes of the Turkish army in the fight against the Kurds force the Americans to intensify the use of aviation and other weapons. To help with military force or to forget and leave to their own devices.

There is a thought that American “rakes” are even more attractive than all the others. Washington with the stubbornness of an idiot is jumping on a rake. Although, in my opinion, again, it would be better to jump on a shovel shovel. The blow falls not on the forehead, but on another place that American politicians think.

The United States plays exactly as they played with the DPRK. The fact is that the "pacification" of the DPRK is advertised as Trump's victory over the Korean leader. Moreover, the advertising campaign is so active that even the political opinion of the United States strengthened the “winning opinion”. They are sure that they “broke” Kim Jong-un. Broke their own military strength.

In principle, the logic of the Americans is clear. Russia's responses to calls were always delayed in time and therefore interpreted remotely from the event itself. With appropriate information flips answers can always be masked. Therefore, unexpectedly for the Pentagon, the words of General of the Army General Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, were heard.

"In the event of a threat to the life of our servicemen, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take retaliatory measures both on the missiles and on the carriers who will use them."

What happened in reality?

For any attitude toward America, it’s not worth talking about the fact that the generals are less educated than in Russia in the American headquarters. The generals there are well prepared and understand in military affairs. That's why they shut up today. Two or three sentences from the speech of the head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation produced the effect of a bombshell.

The first thing that became clear to the Americans: Russia is well aware of the preparation of attacks on the Assad army. Thoroughly prepared himatak imitation operations in Eastern Gute and other areas of Syria are disclosed. Moreover, the Russians now no longer speak to the Americans "through closed channels", but spread their own intelligence information into open access.

And the second. For the first time, Russia openly announced the possibility of a tough response to American strikes. Nobody in the world made such statements after the collapse of the USSR. Even Kim Jong-un spoke of a limited strike. Gerasimov dotted all i. The answer will be not on rockets or airplanes, but on carriers! And which carriers are mainly used by the United States? Where should it fly from?

The coming days will be decisive in resolving the conflict. Americans are put in a situation where any decision will lead to a change in attitude towards the United States as the leading military power.

If there is a decision to strike at Damascus, the Americans will have to go into direct confrontation with Russia. Without neutralizing the air defense system, an air strike is impossible. It means that it is necessary to destroy the Russian systems managed by the Russian military. The answer, according to Gerasimov, is not long in coming.

Will the Americans refuse to strike? The image of the superpower will be lost. Although after the conflict with North Korea, it is silly to talk seriously about the superpower. Yes, and a businessman in power shows the most disgusting features of modern business, and not politics. The campaign will begin on "explaining to Russian the statements of the permanent representative to the UN."

In general, to talk about a possible full-scale war today is not worth it. Americans understand their own capabilities in such a war. There is no chance to win, but it is quite possible to get a lot of negativity in your own country for any outcome.

The upcoming events that await us are the assault of Eastern Guta by the Assad army. Storm hard. The elimination of terrorists there will no longer be connected with the agreements in Astana and Sochi. And according to intelligence data, military advisers of Western countries, mercenaries and other Western "ichtamnets" are in Gut today.

Washington went for broke. And got an unexpected result. So who beat someone?
Author:
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Titsen
    Titsen 15 March 2018 06: 33
    +9
    The NGS verbal answer is beautiful, but will there be enough will, and, most importantly, will our strike systems be able to strike in a limited and accurate way? ...
    1. Sunjar
      Sunjar 15 March 2018 08: 29
      +3
      Is not a fact. Putin himself scared about Novorossiya, if only they would try. Have tried. Here, of course, the situation is different, but ... So let's hope for the remnants of the US mind.
    2. Santor
      Santor 15 March 2018 10: 08
      +16
      Judging by the fact that only yesterday yesterday 30 su-30's arrived in Syria, and the day before yesterday 27 pieces, plus all 6 submarines with Caliber are in Middle East and another carrier, Essen, urgently arrived there on March 12 BDK "Minsk" with special forces as the Turks noted on board - https://twitter.com/YorukIsik/status/973096587340
      779520- are not going to retreat.
      I tweeted to the Turks:
      55 minutes ago, the Orsk-BDK passed through the Bosphorus towards Syria at full speed.
      11 hours ago "Grigorovich" under the admiral's flag - https://twitter.com/YorukIsik/status/973823527727
      091713
      23 hours ago, “Inquisitive” stomped there too -
      https://twitter.com/YorukIsik/status/973821701531
      283456
      1. MoJloT
        MoJloT 15 March 2018 11: 59
        0
        Fly, swim ... while in NATO is not opposed.
      2. NN52
        NN52 15 March 2018 14: 40
        +11
        Santor
        Do you yourself believe that 57 Su 30?!?!?!?! Planes will arrive in Syria in two days.
        These are three regiments with two squadrons ....
      3. the most important
        the most important 15 March 2018 19: 30
        +2
        Quote: Santor
        30 su-30s arrived in Syria yesterday, and the day before yesterday 27,

        But where are they located there ??? And you can’t keep everything in a heap on one base.
    3. Kent0001
      Kent0001 15 March 2018 11: 16
      +7
      I think the probability of our answer is 50/50, as well as the possibility of a US strike in today's conditions (i.e., according to probability theory, the event will not happen if its probability is less than 85% :). If we don’t drift in Guta now, the Americans will understand that we can beat it up with carriers, especially if something from our remaining Navy with anti-aircraft missiles and anti-ship missiles is pulled into Tartus, i.e. forces capable of harming the grouping of US ships in the Mediterranean. Well then, you have to wait for a reaction to 5 tbsp. Of the NATO charter, which of the vassals will fight for the USA, and it’s a complete paragraph if NATO decides to hit us from Europe in the form of an answer ..., well, here I’m obviously driving, though ...?
      And as for Britain - they just need grandmothers for brexit - and this is an occasion to squeeze them from our runaway aligarchs.
      1. andj61
        andj61 15 March 2018 14: 10
        +7
        Quote: Kent0001
        And as for Britain - they just need grandmothers for brexit - and this is an occasion to squeeze them from our runaway aligarchs.

        These events are not such an occasion. The British have long declared the possibility of financial sanctions against individuals who have made their fortunes by criminal means. But in Russia there are no others! Unless Kaspersky in the company can be remembered - they get rich due to their own brains. So runaway and other oligarchs with ownership in foggy Albion can be unpleasantly surprised!
        Theresa May's logic is simple - she began to rapidly lose her rating. This is due to Brexit and the general economic situation. And so she decided to gain a rating in this way - a past provocation connected with Litvinenko allowed Tony Blair to significantly raise her rating in 2006. She does not need an investigation or a fair trial at all. The main thing is to raise a wave. Therefore, the British will only hysteria.
        But the investigation may lead to unexpected results. The developer of the notorious "newcomer" has been living in the United States since 1992, and the fact that the British quickly identified this gas suggests that they also have samples for comparison and formulas. That is, they can produce it - even if they can do it in the laboratory as well. The main production and testing ground for the beginner were located in the city of Nukus in Uzbekistan. In the 00s, under the control and funding of the United States, they were closed, and the remaining stockpiles of chemical weapons were destroyed. This gas was not in service either in the USSR or in Russia. So as of today, at least four countries have the chemical formula of a newcomer - Russia, the USA, Great Britain and Uzbekistan. bully
        Regarding the possibility of a U.S. strike on our military - something I don’t believe in it !. Americans can strike only if they are sure that no answer will arrive. And here they are just sure of the opposite. So things will not go further than loud statements. Our politicians and the military in general should clearly identify the red lines, the violation of which Russia will not allow by all available means. Speaking abstractly - they say the United States will be responsible - is not worth it. But something in the style of a recent statement by the NHS - that’s it! hi
        1. uskrabut
          uskrabut 15 March 2018 15: 29
          +1
          Quote: andj61
          But something in the style of a recent statement by the NHS - that’s it!

          It is better to land an American aircraft in Syria.
          1. andj61
            andj61 15 March 2018 16: 04
            +1
            Quote: uskrabut
            Quote: andj61
            But something in the style of a recent statement by the NHS - that’s it!

            It is better to land an American aircraft in Syria.

            And it’s better if it is manned. bully
            Naturally, solely in response to the aggressive actions of the Americans. hi
            1. Suhow
              Suhow 16 March 2018 22: 54
              +1
              and land by the forces of the Syrian Arab Army in response to aggression and violation of the territory of the republic ...
    4. Starik72
      Starik72 19 March 2018 12: 10
      0
      Titsen. .........., but will there be enough, ..... Do not hesitate, enough!
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 March 2018 06: 34
    +25
    Fearfully. Now it’s really scary. Really fingers on the buttons. And Russia is not North Korea. We have not two and a half missiles with an unknown number of warheads ...
    1. Esoteric
      Esoteric 15 March 2018 07: 54
      +19
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Fearfully. Now it’s really scary. Really fingers on the buttons. And Russia is not North Korea. We have not two and a half missiles with an unknown number of warheads ...

      You do not panic ahead of time. If you remember, “Provide capital with 10% of the profit, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, with 300% there is no such crime, which he would not risk taking, at least under the fear of the gallows. ”Except for one - suicide. This was understood in the DPRK when they went all-in and “dressed” the “red flaky stump” and Trump’s threats and all the “defiles” of his AUG. Sorry, this “GB” must be in awe of the threat that the “Russian Bear” will lower its claw to Her squalor. Political pygmies run in front of the colossus and wave cacti in front of him.
      Remember in a joke where a grandmother with a bag sneaks along the bus and repeats all the time: “Do not beat the eggs! Guys! Do not make eggs! ” And to the question: “What are you, mother, eggs in a bag?” Grandma said: “There - not eggs, but nails! Do not make eggs ... " laughing
      1. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 15 March 2018 11: 29
        +9
        On the one hand you are right, but on the other not. From a military point of view, we have fighting spirit and skills at the highest level and we will not back down. And on the other hand, "our elites" can easily pass. Remember the beginning of the 90s. The enemy did not surrender the country, but "theirs." There are even more such “friends” in the manual now. Apart from the obvious traitors and agents of influence and just weathercocks. And if something happens to the GDP, but on the eve of the elections ... Removing a couple of key figures will not be difficult for them. I hope that I am not original in my fears and these paths for "mine" are blocked.
        1. uskrabut
          uskrabut 15 March 2018 15: 33
          +2
          Quote: AKuzenka
          I hope that I am not original in my fears and these paths for "mine" are blocked.

          All hope that the Armed Forces are not led by those who led in the late 80s and early 90s. There will be a decisive command of the military - Russia will stand.
    2. reibert
      reibert 15 March 2018 08: 19
      +6
      Hysteria ??))) Ordinary diploma. war))) This was ... time 47 already)))) Let the Britons, as the weakest, 1 to stay on the sidelines, in which case .. at 2: no evidence, only indirect ... And for the UN- this is a fiction))) And everyone perfectly understands this, and that and the other side)))
      1. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 15 March 2018 11: 33
        +2
        Alas, neither one nor the other. Britain has long turned from the arbiter of the destinies of the world into a capo working for the US administration. A prisoner of a concentration camp who, for the sake of an extra piece of bread, scoffs at the others. Sometimes it makes fun much harder than the overseer. But it does not have rights and is completely dependent on the administration.

        I do not agree. The brain center of the Western world, in Britain was and remains. SGA, no matter how they entertained their vanity, are just performers. And all the other Western countries, even lower, at best live on handouts, and when necessary they simply sacrifice them for the sake of British interests. History has repeatedly confirmed this.
        1. lady.endzhi
          lady.endzhi 15 March 2018 12: 34
          0
          Akuzenka
          Meant - in the military plan. She can’t force anyone to do anything by force. And what does the brain center and all the money of the world spinning there? The island, along with all this, can safely go under water overnight. So in military affairs, as in the case of coercion, if it comes to this, she is definitely not the arbiter of fate.
        2. uskrabut
          uskrabut 15 March 2018 15: 35
          0
          Quote: AKuzenka
          The brain center of the Western world, in Britain was and remains.

          I agree, that is still an island.
    3. Berber
      Berber 15 March 2018 08: 47
      +6
      Always spoke at the head of state can not put a trader. And in the US, all traders. For them, the measure of combat effectiveness is the size of the budget. And then there is a mismatch - realities break patterns.
      1. Opera
        Opera 15 March 2018 09: 50
        +17
        All this is Anglo-Saxon rudeness and show-off is simply the final loss of face! And speaking of a simple disgrace! Who did you give 24 hours to, Zakharova said ?! Well, 24 hours have passed ... And ?! Are you sending diplomats ?! And that’s all ?! Oh yes! Do you stop any relations there that were long terminated and cancel Lavrov’s visit, which we haven’t even considered ?! And this aunt with a face that gives a clear reason to seriously think about the real possibility of the existence of a secret order of reptilians, tried to insult Lavrov that he was kind of out of place ?! Well, I’m very clearly imagining in what place Lavrov saw her with all her cabinet, lords, peers and co ... Speaking of the queen - mother! I am sure after 24 hours before the heavenly punishment for Russia and Putin personally from May and her shaggy friend, the queen said something like - you, that this ..., ..., dishonored my gray noble dynastic curls ...,. .., ... !!! In order to decide to send diplomats you need to give 24 hours?!?!?! They will think about us now that we are in full ... And you and this .... ..... ..... .... .... ... at Trump and the whole Congress and more nor ... ... ... !!!
        But what about the United States, they want to bomb Damascus ?! Well, how can we ban them? They were just warned of the consequences! So let's see.
        1. uskrabut
          uskrabut 15 March 2018 15: 39
          0
          Quote: Oper
          in what place did Lavrov see her with all her cabinet, lords, peers and co ... Speaking of the queen - mother!

          All their blahArodnye surnames came from the frostbitten rabble of robbers and murderers.
        2. your1970
          your1970 15 March 2018 20: 12
          0
          "AND make sure in that neither members of the royal familynor members of the government were not present at the 2018 World Cup in Russia "- and no one paid attention - that T. May also queen and royal family trying to steer and indicate - where they are, and where not ..
          not only that - it is promised to control it belay belay belay
        3. Pete mitchell
          Pete mitchell 16 March 2018 13: 29
          +5
          Quote: Oper
          so I imagine very clearly in what place Lavrov saw her with all her cabinet, lords, peers and
          you still want to say where Lavrov turned it with .... I would love to help him, but I think he doesn’t need it, he would easily spin the white house with the State Department ..
          And once again I agree with you, Her Majesty probably wondered: where to find modern church painters and thatcher
  3. savage1976
    savage1976 15 March 2018 06: 42
    +7
    We need an urgent demonstration of the performance of the "Dagger". We need to make sure, to them to make sure it is available.
    1. Titsen
      Titsen 15 March 2018 06: 46
      +5
      Quote: savage1976
      We need an urgent demonstration of the performance of the "Dagger". We need to make sure, to them to make sure it is available.


      Well there is one.

      So what?

      Hundreds if not thousands are needed!
      1. serg999
        serg999 15 March 2018 07: 07
        +5
        Quote: Titsen
        Quote: savage1976
        We need an urgent demonstration of the performance of the "Dagger". We need to make sure, to them to make sure it is available.


        Well there is one.

        So what?

        Hundreds if not thousands are needed!

        What makes you think that there’s only one? Maybe there are hundreds or thousands of them? Yes, and without the "daggers" we have something to answer, it will not seem enough.
        1. 97110
          97110 15 March 2018 10: 21
          +3
          Quote: serg999
          we have something to answer, it will not seem a little.

          I immediately remembered the political leader, rubbing an eraser on the map, and muttering: "Yes figs with her, with England, but there must be order on the ship!"
      2. kudma
        kudma 15 March 2018 07: 08
        +5
        And Putin himself reported to you how many of them we have? Maybe there are already hundreds of them, neither you nor I will ever know about it.
      3. domokl
        15 March 2018 07: 09
        +4
        And why are they needed in such numbers? Sorry, but you think in terms of the second world ...
        Today, the beginning of such a war will mean the destruction of the planet. Like a cosmic body. Whoever wins, the loser will tear what remains in their own warehouses. The ball will crack ...
        So many Daggers are enough to destroy what really threatens to attack in a particular place. And we and the Americans understand this ...
        1. 97110
          97110 15 March 2018 10: 28
          0
          Quote: domokl
          Sorry, but you think in terms of the second world ...

          Here recently on RenTV it was revealed that the descendants of the "hibakusha" in the 4th generation did not take anything: neither radiation, nor toxins. True, they did not specify: what about a fly swatter? The question is topical - since 1945 the fourth generation should be born. If Japan says something like a terezka, it’s as if their fly swatter isn’t taking ...
        2. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 15 March 2018 11: 36
          +3
          Do not worry. Earth, like a celestial body, will not cease to exist. People have not mastered enough energy. They didn’t even get close.
          1. domokl
            16 March 2018 08: 49
            0
            Quote: AKuzenka
            They didn’t even get close.

            I look at the Phaeton and believe .... Tse impossible uniquely
      4. lance
        lance 15 March 2018 07: 23
        +4
        But what about the United States is already able to deal with calibers, onyxes, etc.?
        1. Pingo
          Pingo 15 March 2018 07: 26
          +1
          the aeroballistic Dagger or Iskander can be removed by SM3, by the way, Yeltsin gave it to the Americans.
          1. lance
            lance 15 March 2018 07: 28
            +3
            according to recent tests, this is clearly visible. OPK knows how to slip in, especially the older frames.
          2. lance
            lance 15 March 2018 07: 33
            +3
            where and how will simka3 catch up and calculate a variable path both in height and in plan?
            1. Pingo
              Pingo 15 March 2018 07: 53
              0
              Yeltsinoids transferred this technology to the United States precisely to protect American AUGs from aeroballistic missiles of that time, and the live rocket from the S-300 was at the same time brought.
              1. 75 hammer
                75 hammer 15 March 2018 08: 53
                +2
                This lesson is useless, anti-missile costs should be at 1/25, while the C300 PM does not have such capabilities, maybe 400, but you can’t even talk about Aegis, 25 missiles at least if the launch point is known, and if there are several not over 2000 km? No chance darling!
                1. Pingo
                  Pingo 15 March 2018 08: 58
                  0
                  the working technology was transferred, dear. only after that SM2 was changed to SM3 and it began to intercept warheads on tests over the Pacific Ocean
                  destroyers with it is an escort aug or mobile missile defense
                  1. 75 hammer
                    75 hammer 15 March 2018 11: 21
                    +3
                    I don’t need to write back what and who transmitted, take the characteristics of the rockets + detection and guidance methods + guidance on the final section of the trajectory, then take the speed and possible overload of the attacking rocket and everything will become clear to you if you studied well at school! CM3 can intercept a target missile, similar in characteristics to Uranus only with the consumption of missiles 4. Teach the materiel and you will be happy! You can not answer only if with calculations and proof of nasty test results!
                    1. Pingo
                      Pingo 16 March 2018 01: 09
                      0
                      aeroballistic intercept able even more so for that and transmitted
      5. maratk
        maratk 15 March 2018 07: 48
        +3
        write millions more !!! in fact, if they were adopted and a regiment in the south is already equipped with them, as was said earlier, the number is enough to destroy those large objects that need to be destroyed primarily from a military point of view. Well, besides, there are other missiles in Syria that can destroy any object with the same Iskanders.
      6. Esoteric
        Esoteric 15 March 2018 07: 59
        +3
        Quote: Titsen
        Hundreds if not thousands are needed!

        Hundreds? Thousands? laughing laughing laughing As the late Papanov said:
      7. businessv
        businessv 15 March 2018 11: 15
        0
        Quote: Titsen
        Well there is one.
        So what?
        Hundreds if not thousands are needed!

        Well, why do you think that he is alone ?! Damn, well, at least a little ask what kind of system it is, limited data has already been posted to our MO. And it won’t reach thousands - time will not allow it.
  4. andrewkor
    andrewkor 15 March 2018 07: 24
    0
    Wow, fried smell, but for whom chestnuts from the fire?
    1. domokl
      15 March 2018 08: 08
      +2
      Do not believe it, but for yourself beloved ... I really do not want to become a karachik. Since childhood, not accustomed ...
      1. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 15 March 2018 11: 40
        0
        So you are not accustomed to it. Among those who decide the fate of the country, many stand on them and enjoy. It depends on them when they surrender us. And they will surrender as soon as they consider it profitable for their wallet.
  5. Petr1
    Petr1 15 March 2018 08: 09
    +1
    The answer will not be on missiles or aircraft, but on carriers! And which carriers do the US mostly use?
    But aren't the planes carriers? And didn’t they already destroyed the Western specialists?
    There the bearded ones rested against the Yankers of their useless death !!
  6. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn 15 March 2018 08: 35
    +11
    I think that the Americans will not risk it. According to recent reports, Russia also pulled up some surface fleet. We don’t know about submarines, maybe there are already a dozen of them, and American ships can very easily sink to the bottom. VKS is also strengthened. Apparently less than the Americans, but there are some. I think they won’t take a chance. And the response of the General Staff pleased, just pleased, finally.
    1. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 15 March 2018 10: 29
      +1
      God grant that it would be so ....
  7. Maalkavianin
    Maalkavianin 15 March 2018 09: 13
    +1
    Woke up damn ... Everywhere and always right is the one who is stronger. So it was and it will be so. All these international agreements were adopted after centuries of brutal wars and not otherwise.
    1. 97110
      97110 15 March 2018 10: 43
      +1
      Quote: Malkavianin
      Everywhere and always right is the one who is stronger.

      At the time of my youth, the phrase “You don’t look that I am small. I am a technical one” was popular in St. Petersburg.
  8. BAI
    BAI 15 March 2018 09: 17
    +6
    "In the event of a threat to the life of our servicemen, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take retaliatory measures both on the missiles and on the carriers who will use them."

    Although this is very dangerous, the situation is such that the main thing is that the words do not go wrong.
    1. Korax71
      Korax71 15 March 2018 10: 14
      0
      Here I am talking about the same thing. In the event of a life threat to our military personnel, it’s very spatial. It’s a formidable application, but no specifics. Yes, there were already belligerent applications and about the fact that we would not allow the Allies to touch them. The result is a little different than what was expected .
      1. savage1976
        savage1976 15 March 2018 12: 35
        +2
        Well, in fact, the answer has already arrived to Israel, and so far it has become quiet and does not protrude, so this is worth considering.
  9. tank64rus
    tank64rus 15 March 2018 09: 23
    +3
    The coming days will be decisive in resolving the conflict. Americans are put in a situation where any decision will lead to a change in attitude towards the United States as the leading military power.
    1. businessv
      businessv 15 March 2018 11: 20
      0
      Quote: tank64rus
      The Americans are in a situation where any decision will lead to a change in their attitude to the United States as a leading military power.

      IMHO, has already led to a change, which is why around the world the howl and hysteria of Britons and mattresses.
  10. Fonmeg
    Fonmeg 15 March 2018 10: 05
    +1
    The eternal desire to strangle Russia!
  11. Bo Yari
    Bo Yari 15 March 2018 10: 17
    +1
    such a long text .... but it doesn’t cover the truth, murders have become the practice of the FSB
    1. lance
      lance 15 March 2018 10: 23
      +5
      exactly, they’ll come for you today. wait.
    2. domokl
      15 March 2018 10: 41
      +8
      There are fools in the world who have at least a count on their head. Intelligence agencies live by their own laws, which you could see when our main scouts went to barbecue in the US. they wanted to spit on all these sanctions and other entertainments of politicians.
      Since 1978, the specialists refused to eliminate traitors. And ours and American and others. The information is completely open. So, wa bunch, pan Bo Yarsky, just a bunch. Smelly, but not dangerous ...
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 15 March 2018 11: 40
        +4
        Quote: domokl
        Since 1978, specialists refused to eliminate traitors. And ours and American and others.

        And in Qatar, what happened then? They blew up the traitor, the Chechen rebel Yandarbiiev. The Soviet specialists refused this, the Russians liquidate whoever you want, if there is need, no worse than Sudoplatov!
        1. your1970
          your1970 15 March 2018 20: 19
          0
          - you do not confuse sitting in prison Skripalya with Qatar - the situations are completely different ....

          They would like to destroy and / or pose a threat to the Russian Federation - he is in prison - bread would choke / brick would fall / yes commonplace acute dysentery ...
          no one would have mercy on him ...
  12. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 15 March 2018 10: 31
    0
    It is now more profitable for the Americans to save face, while not starting the Third World War, Russia now cannot face the dirt (the same thing) and fulfill the promise of the National High School of the Russian Federation .... here’s the dilemma of what to do? And while not unleashing a third world.
  13. Chaos
    Chaos 15 March 2018 10: 43
    0
    Yusa launch tomahawks from the ship. We are drowning a ship from a submarine. They drown the submarine from their submarine. We drown their submarine. So much for the limited war in the Syrian region. And that’s all over, nobody will dare to launch the first ICBM with nuclear weapons.
  14. P0LYM
    P0LYM 15 March 2018 11: 00
    0
    I liked the wording:
    but to get a bunch of negativity in your own country for any outcome is quite possible.
    ... well, if after the retaliatory strike the psychotherapists remain alive, then they will cope with the negative ... in general, 3,14ndos are a nation of optimists
  15. Qubi
    Qubi 15 March 2018 11: 21
    0
    In East Ghouta, they will now find a "Novice" and connect with Skripal and Russia. Then everything is clear.
  16. SERGEY KOZLOV
    SERGEY KOZLOV 15 March 2018 11: 38
    +1
    "The situation, in my opinion, is akin to the famous Caribbean crisis."
    No, the situation is more reminiscent of 1941. Enemy troops occupy their original positions, road infrastructure is being prepared, and ammunition and fuel and lubricants are transported directly to their locations. The evening ceases to be languid, just wait until the aggressor in front of the entire MC defines himself as the Aggressor, as Stalin needed in the 41st, now there is no need. And they themselves feel their end, understand that they will not be spared. They have the commander in chief Satan, he needs his own harvest. So we decided.
  17. lady.endzhi
    lady.endzhi 15 March 2018 12: 18
    +2
    It’s just that the Americans have always behaved like that - Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia. And no one thought to stop them, because the forces were not the same. As a result, Americans reasonably considered themselves exceptional. And now they were suddenly simply smeared face on the table. Star disease is difficult to pass, but we will help them with this.
  18. flicker
    flicker 15 March 2018 12: 57
    +1
    In recent years, the American elite, from the so-called "deep state", has been actively building bomb shelters. It would be nice to make public the location of these shelters. I would sober them up right away.
  19. P0LYM
    P0LYM 15 March 2018 13: 54
    0
    God give us survive the elections and the World Cup ... I think the answer will go tough ... stopudovo !!! He really doesn’t want to apparently VV spoil the holiday for football lovers ... yes, probably, it’s a pity for the grandmothers if they will be dumped into the empty ... but then, I think they will all hiccup before vomiting ...
  20. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 15 March 2018 15: 07
    0
    If there is a decision to strike at Damascus, the Americans will have to go into direct confrontation with Russia. Without neutralizing the air defense system, an air strike is impossible. It means that it is necessary to destroy the Russian systems managed by the Russian military. The answer, according to Gerasimov, is not long in coming.

    There wasn’t enough political will for such a thing .... but the US always had an answer ... But this is better than just looking at their actions.
  21. The poor man
    The poor man 15 March 2018 16: 06
    0
    And in response to the English ultimatum, we will launch our “bird” with a nuclear power plant and let it fly for a year or so around England. Well, where and when to land this “bird” will depend on the outcome of their ultimatum.
  22. turbris
    turbris 15 March 2018 17: 31
    0
    I agree with the author that the situation in Syria is clearly tied to May’s tantrum at the request of the United States, but there are a number of factors besides this - the elections and the World Cup, which Russia stole from Britain. Therefore, "English shits", there is nothing surprising in this. What Russia should do is adequately respond to the expulsion of diplomats, initiate a criminal case on the attempt on the life of a Russian citizen and go to the crime scene. And if they don’t allow it, then accuse England of countering the investigation and concealing evidence of a crime against Russia ...
  23. iouris
    iouris 15 March 2018 17: 44
    0
    Quote: “Washington went all-in. And got an unexpected result. So who outplayed whom?” The end of the quote.
    This game is very long. At the end of the game, not a single sovereign state should remain and while the game is going on successfully. The USSR and the world system of socialism were able to interfere.
    In addition to Syria, Theresa May has many internal reasons for organizing this provocation, it can be said that the situation in Britain forced her to lead the campaign against Russia. In such a situation, all NATO leaders will verbally support Theresa, however, it seems that they are gloating that she, and not him, is entrusted with the dirty work.
  24. Satum
    Satum 15 March 2018 20: 50
    0
    What a stupid thing. On the news, they made clear about NATO’s fifth article. The landing of paslov is a step towards breaking relations with the Russian Federation. In short, England and the United States want to use the fifth article of NATO, which would quickly bring the number of NATO troops to a maximum to the borders of the Russian Federation. Simply put, NATO is preparing for war
    1. domokl
      16 March 2018 08: 59
      0
      Zvinyate, please name those who are preparing to fight with Russia by nationality. NATO is preparing ... Who exactly? The great army of Holland or Estonia? Just wondering
  25. Indifferent
    Indifferent 16 March 2018 01: 53
    0
    They say with a Ukrainian accent: "Don’t give me a gop until you jump over!" I can not stand any hatred. And aviation in the USA is very serious and they managed to easily turn the Wagner group into a bunch of meat. So let's think! And do not throw caps! God help me!
    1. domokl
      16 March 2018 09: 03
      +1
      But here in Siberia they say differently. You will be afraid later, now you have to do business ... Well, have you destroyed or not destroyed the PMC employees and what? Every day, men risk their lives in the taiga, and what? Normal work ... for a man.
  26. Gato
    Gato 16 March 2018 22: 32
    0
    Chamberlain threatens us
    Old horseradish - a parasite
    We are facing Chamberlain
    Parasite - Old Horseradish
  27. abrakadabre
    abrakadabre 16 March 2018 23: 03
    0
    "In the event of a threat to the life of our servicemen, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take retaliatory measures both on the missiles and on the carriers who will use them."
    In principle, only something like that would be tougher than such a statement:
    The local commanders were ordered: in the event of a life threat to our troops, open fire on readiness, by all means at their disposal, both at the directly attacking targets and at the position areas from where the attack was made, regardless of whether these areas belong to the territory ATS ".
    With addition:
    "In order to ensure maximum security for citizens of the Russian Federation, clarification of the degree of the threat that has arisen will be carried out upon the suppression of such."
    And according to intelligence, it is in Ghout that military advisers of Western countries, mercenaries and other Western "ichtamnets" are located today.
    Perhaps it is time to not just take such prisoners or quietly eliminate them during the database, but to publicly demonstrate them. Though in the form of a carcass, even alive (which is preferable). With scoring all related information about their role in the database.
  28. andrew xnumx
    andrew xnumx 18 March 2018 12: 22
    0
    Terrorists in Eastern Ghout need to be destroyed as quickly as possible, without looking back at the Americans. Here speed matters. Then a possible strike by the United States will be largely meaningless. Well, one must prepare hard to repulse the blow.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. Wolka
    Wolka 21 March 2018 20: 06
    0
    everything is ambiguous, and time will tell who is capable of what ...
  31. Radikal
    Radikal 21 March 2018 22: 46
    0
    Will the Americans give up the blow? The image of a superpower will be lost.
    Do not refuse. They will coincide with something - the 2018 World Cup, Trump's meeting with Putin, etc. wassat They are masters at it! sad