Hayley is determined to ban Russia from inflicting air strikes in Syria

82
The United States proposes a draft resolution of the UN Security Council, which will not give Russian and Syrian troops the opportunity to strike at "moderate opposition", the newspaper said Look statement by US envoy Nikki Haley.





At the meeting, Security Council Haley said that Moscow and Damascus did not initially plan to implement the UN resolution 2401 on a cease-fire in Syria.

In the past two weeks, the Russian and Syrian regimes have been very busy labeling each opposition group in Eastern Ghouta, calling them terrorist groups,
she said.

We have prepared a new draft resolution on the establishment of a cease-fire regime that will not leave any loopholes. It is simple, straightforward and obligatory for execution. The resolution will come into force immediately after the adoption, there are no counter-terrorism loopholes that can be used (Syrian President Bashar) Assad, Iran and Russia,
explained the representative.

She added that if the UN cannot achieve a cease-fire in the suburbs of Damascus, the United States can again strike at Syria.

Earlier, Moscow has repeatedly stressed that the cease-fire should not extend to the fight against terrorist groups such as "Dzhebhat an-Nusra" (banned in the Russian Federation). At the same time, the militants continue to bombard civilians and humanitarian corridors in Eastern Gut.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    13 March 2018 10: 33
    Let him forbid himself to generate idiotic thoughts. D.B.
    1. +11
      13 March 2018 10: 40
      I'm just wondering - How does she imagine it? laughing
      1. +2
        13 March 2018 10: 52
        Renting half Hmeimim for rent, probably smile
        1. 0
          14 March 2018 16: 35
          Aloemc
          Let him forbid himself to generate idiotic thoughts. D.B.

          And what kind of adequacy in the US military aggression against the ATS in BV can one want from the American religious sectarian and US envoy to the United Nations Nikki Haley, as well as the wife of the American military, who, by her own forces, is rushing to award herself the pro-American Nobel Peace Prizes ?!
          Yes, no adequacy, except for the continuation of US aggression in the BV against the ATS, Iran and other countries, including Russia!
      2. +41
        13 March 2018 10: 52
        The question for the USA will be the same: a list of these "moderate", exact coordinates of their deployment, distinctive features from other terrorists, evidence of these differences. No answer? Then evacuate them to the USA - they are not dangerous ...
      3. +4
        13 March 2018 11: 49
        Quote: Finches
        I'm just wondering - How does she imagine it?

        fist on the table. in my kitchen
    2. +21
      13 March 2018 10: 44
      It’s time it may already change the rhetoric in the appeal to the USA, begin to call the rule in the USA a bloody regime of democracy.
      1. +10
        13 March 2018 10: 47
        it had to be done the day before yesterday, and we have all the "partners" (burn them in hell)
      2. +2
        13 March 2018 14: 19
        “In the event of a life threat, our servicemen of the RF Armed Forces will take retaliatory measures against both the missiles and the carriers that will use them.
        Source: http://rusvesna.su/news/1520931652
    3. +5
      13 March 2018 10: 49
      How would she not burst from such fullness of her determination! belay
      1. +8
        13 March 2018 11: 18
        I didn’t understand her about "anti-terrorist loopholes".
        That is, these terrorists who fire at civilians and hold them hostage for the United States do not deserve punishment, i.e. to. they are in opposition.
        But I realized that, on the one hand, referring to the UN Security Council, on the other hand, the United States "put" on it. Is this not international blackmail?
        Isn't it time already to give these impudents a drink. Moreover, after February 7th they owe them ...
    4. 0
      14 March 2018 15: 55
      They cannot, there are no others))) They had one Psaki, and that one was removed for clever thoughts)))
      1. +2
        14 March 2018 16: 13
        They had one Psaki,

        And in general, the beauty was bully and her all rotten type of mimra, and you look at the PRESENT! crying
    5. 0
      20 March 2018 09: 10
      This is the whole of C ... the essence of their existence in this world.
  2. +3
    13 March 2018 10: 33
    Hayley is determined to ban Russia from inflicting air strikes in Syria
    in response: multiply it! fucking mericatos ...
    1. +4
      13 March 2018 10: 38
      It was hot to see a lot, since it squealed like that.
      1. +6
        13 March 2018 10: 41
        No, you do not pull, Nikki, on Munchausen. Only he could single-handedly declare war (England) and win it. And you would go home in a bad way, otherwise it would be even worse in a good way, Nebenzya will explain to you. laughing
      2. +3
        13 March 2018 10: 46
        Right So we are moving in the right direction. The main thing is not to stop. It's time to ignore these screams.
    2. +5
      13 March 2018 11: 20
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      in response: multiply it!

      hi
      Already. For this, the Russian Federation has transferred 27 aircraft to Syria, if I am not mistaken, and designated "test" launches of "lionfish" from a squadron in the Mediterranean Sea. But all these actions of the Americans and ours are fraught with big troubles and the situation in Syria is pregnant with war. We are right on our side since the United States is not legal in Syria and operates without the approval of the UN, and our forces are deployed there with the invitation of the government and act with the approval of the UN. But this does not stop the “exclusive” impudent nation, and it already dictates its “Wishlist” to the UN (which spreads its snot and does not take any measures against the presumptuous bandit).
  3. +3
    13 March 2018 10: 34
    Yeah ... it just won’t resolve ...
    It is a pity that a sufficient number of new weapons have not yet been done ...
  4. +18
    13 March 2018 10: 37
    An interesting mix turns out)) ... the occupants in Syria (and the United States and other coalition is illegally located there) ... declare an open challenge to the legitimate government and the troops of a sovereign power ... RUSSIA located in Syria in accordance with international law)
    And wherever they train such illiterate politicians who for the last 25-30 years have been behaving like the last gopniks / lawless people without any political concepts ... I'm not talking about compliance with elementary international norms and rules ...
    1. +1
      13 March 2018 10: 49
      You are right in everything, except for one thing ... Pi_ndos can increase their presence in Syria multiple times and theoretically just smear us without international statements .... Only realizing that the chopping will be concrete and specific losses, pi_ndos do not dare, and time is playing on us. ..We are getting stronger every day ...
      "PS" .But not like an old joke ...
      1. 0
        13 March 2018 17: 27
        So we will arrange a hack for them there, let them gather more people! soldier
    2. +2
      13 March 2018 11: 09
      common American, so far unpunished, disgusting
  5. +4
    13 March 2018 10: 39
    Another confirmation that the longer the United States does not get in the teeth, the bolder and more aggressive its foreign policy becomes.
  6. +1
    13 March 2018 10: 40
    To scream at the UN is the maximum that the United States is capable of today on the situation in Ghouta.
    It will be much more interesting when the sweep across the Euphrates begins.
  7. +4
    13 March 2018 10: 40
    The US may strike again at Syria.
    If this happens, and this is not excluded, then Russia and its allies will simply have to react harshly, otherwise the impudent Yankees will not be stopped.
    I have always been interested in the question - in which incubator are these ladies prepared for the UN Security Council. One is more tough than the other, both in appearance and in aggressiveness.
    1. 0
      13 March 2018 10: 52
      no, this appearance is still nothing, I’m waiting for everything when it starts to grow frightened. to match
    2. +2
      13 March 2018 10: 52
      These are talking dolls. They leash voice but do not decide anything.
  8. +3
    13 March 2018 10: 41
    and May wants and Hayley wants. It would be better for them to go to the kitchen and engage in socially useful work.
    1. +1
      13 March 2018 10: 46
      Don't touch the comic old woman (old acting role). She's so cool and original in her red pumps. So unsuccessfully comically trying to be like Margaret Thatcher. But it is not without reason that they claim that history repeats itself first in the form of tragedy, and then in the form of farce. Where else can you find one?
    2. +2
      13 March 2018 10: 52
      maybe they have problems with men? do not satisfy? laughing
  9. +4
    13 March 2018 10: 44
    They see that a scheme is working successfully in the suburbs of Damascus, as in Aleppo at one time, that’s what they’ll hysteria.
  10. 0
    13 March 2018 10: 48
    Quote: Finches
    I'm just wondering - How does she imagine it?

    ---------------------------
    She proposes to move from a proxy war to a direct clash with Russia in Syria. In general, their hands are already itching to try themselves in battle.
    1. 0
      13 March 2018 10: 52
      I still do not understand what happened to the Wagner PMC? Was it or not? Who knows what?
  11. +1
    13 March 2018 10: 51
    What does “mandatory” mean? A lot of what the states themselves “do” to force us to do what they want?
  12. +1
    13 March 2018 10: 52
    Not. It is necessary to submit a counter "claim" to the UN Security Council from Syria, Iran and Russia, together with a proposal to get out of the invaders. In case of failure to shoot down everything that flies illegally within the borders of a sovereign state.
  13. +2
    13 March 2018 11: 02
    Direct interference in the affairs of a sovereign state am Unlike mattress mats, the Syrians are fighting on their territory. US bases created on the territory of Syria occupied by them are subject to destruction, like the bases of the aggressor! hi
  14. +1
    13 March 2018 11: 03
    Hayley is determined to ban Russia from inflicting air strikes in Syria
    Better to remind them once again that Russia does not know where the American submarines are, and therefore cannot destroy them and thereby protect itself.
    When there is no opportunity to do something real, they just raise a screech - May screeches, Hayley does not lag behind her. Screech is the new hyperweapon of the west.
  15. +2
    13 March 2018 11: 03
    It is necessary to squeeze the United States out of Syria harder, it is time to destroy American terrorist training centers.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +1
    13 March 2018 11: 08
    They are fanatics. A special type of insanity. But this type of fanatics are afraid of death. To the horror. And what pushes them to walk this path to death is fear. Madness. The mind of a smart animal is crazy.
  18. +1
    13 March 2018 11: 10
    It seems like the times have come when the United States, like that grandfather ... sits on the heap and barks at passers-by ... First ... veto right ... Second ... as I understand it ... it's just a concussion ...
  19. +1
    13 March 2018 11: 28
    It's funny to listen to this madam. The United States in Syria is illegal and in the position of the interventionists. It’s as if a thief broke into someone else’s house and began to call for help from a police officer to protect him from the owner. After listening to Haley, you can cut yourself on an obtuse angle.
  20. 0
    13 March 2018 11: 38
    there are no counter-terrorism loopholes that Sydan, Iran and Russia can take advantage of (Syrian President Bashar)

    That is, this entire resolution is in the interests of the United States, and there will be plenty of loopholes for them
  21. SOF
    +1
    13 March 2018 11: 57
    ... at the end they were cut off, utyrki ...
  22. +2
    13 March 2018 11: 58
    [quote] [/ quote] In the past two weeks, the Russian and Syrian regimes have been very busy hanging labels

    Calling us a regime, of course, you do not hang labels ..
    Poor heila, she stomps her foot, waves her arms, but Russia doesn't care .. tongue
  23. +1
    13 March 2018 12: 08
    Another scream of another mongrel. Only the faces and sometimes the gender of those who are tugging towards Russia change, but the rhetoric does not change.
  24. 0
    13 March 2018 12: 27
    When did UN resolutions stop the US? So they are to us a bulb, they asked us, we help! Everything is legal and beautiful, but how is it in their throats ... They no longer know which side to approach!
  25. +2
    13 March 2018 12: 46
    This Haley resolution refers precisely to the United States itself, one piece in another.
  26. BAI
    +1
    13 March 2018 13: 26
    Since the Security Council has recently been very reminiscent of a quarrelsome village - whoever shouts louder is right, I would use village methods - more actively (constantly) accuse the United States of supporting terrorism, since there are plenty of examples.
    And this is generally something:
    в there are no counter-terrorism loopholesthat may benefit (Syrian President Bashar) Assad, Iran and Russia,

    Those. The United States is promoting a resolution that impedes counter-terrorism (counter-terrorism) activities by Syria, Russia and Iran. Those. Does the US openly admit that they are accomplices of terrorists and openly want to smuggle this through the Security Council? Obviously, I already don't understand something in this life.
    1. 0
      13 March 2018 17: 23

      Those. The United States is pushing a resolution that interferes with the counterterrorism (counterterrorism) activities of Syria, Russia and Iran. Those. Does the US openly admit that they are accomplices of terrorists and openly want to smuggle this through the Security Council?

      That's right, comrade! Yes hi
  27. +1
    13 March 2018 13: 26
    I'm embarrassed to ask - does this not apply to the USA, Israel and Turkey?
    and what about tourists who would like to take a picture against the backdrop of oil refineries in the territories depressed by the Kurds?
  28. +1
    13 March 2018 13: 33
    Haley can fuck anything. But, if anything, the American sailors will go to the bottom. And Yankee pilots will get 150 kg of TNT in the ass from the S-400.
  29. +4
    13 March 2018 13: 41
    Here I read about such "formidable intentions" of all sorts of Hayley and Co., and even remember an old children's fairy tale. In short:
    Mice gathered for a meeting to solve the problem, they say, the cat generally got it, sneaks up and SUDDENLY grabs - and that's it, there is no mouse. To overwhelm the insolent cat, but there will be a lot of mice, is not an option. And in general - not democratically) Oh, we decided: we need to tie a bell around the cat's neck. Like, the cat will then be heard from afar, will not be able to sneak up. Here, so all the mice were delighted, they began to congratulate each other on a successful decision. It’s cool, after all, it was high time I found a council for a cat. And then one old mouse and asks: "who will go to the cat to catch the bell then?" And there was silence ...
    Something like this )
  30. +1
    13 March 2018 13: 45
    Baba beast! I would have played with her.
    "Milk with a bun, but on the stove with a fool!" wink
  31. +1
    13 March 2018 13: 57
    In short, America announced that. that she intends to strike at Syria anyway.
    Give her the main reason, although you can without it.
  32. +2
    13 March 2018 14: 36
    The United States is closer than ever to defeat, hence the hysterical chaotic squeals, statements, and, God forbid, actions! Because this defeat will not be a temporary particularity, like Vietnam, it will only be the first domino to bring down dominance, as well as American overconsumption and overconcentration of capital.
  33. +2
    13 March 2018 15: 11
    It is necessary to ban the presence of Americans in Syria and the help of terrorists on their part.
  34. +1
    13 March 2018 15: 25
    imagines herself that She herself is too much. Chicken close its beak.
  35. +1
    13 March 2018 15: 53
    It is hardly worth talking about defeat, the striped ones still have a lot of strength, and the main weapon, the printing press is working!
    It is high time to pinch the proud eagle entogo, but at only if in a crowd, in such a friendly company!
  36. 0
    13 March 2018 16: 24
    Hayley is determined to ban Russia from inflicting air strikes in Syria

    Russia has not looked back only at the opinion of striped hens. laughing
    How it will be necessary for whom to “knock” Russia will knock, looking only at its own opinion and that of Assad and the Iranians. Everyone else is running through the forest. Yes
  37. +1
    13 March 2018 17: 14
    I do not like the situation. A ship in the Black Sea "victim". .... At the border, 45 thousand were driven by wild beasts, the planned strike on Damascus, the madam's hysteria with ultimatums. The squeals of the pigs ... One mistake of Russia can be costly. MINES HAVE ALREADY PUT ... THE WISDOMS OF RESISTANCE AND PRAGMATICITY TO THE LEADERSHIP OF RUSSIA!
  38. 0
    13 March 2018 17: 18
    Why the heck do we need such a resolution to please the bearded barmaley and their patrons ?! belay Soaked and will soak !!! soldier angry
  39. +1
    13 March 2018 19: 29
    The resolution will enter into force immediately after adoption

    It remains only to accept and persuade Russia not to use the veto.
    And the woman's entoy clearly has uterine rabies ...
  40. 0
    13 March 2018 20: 51
    Quote: Finches
    I'm just wondering - How does she imagine it? laughing

    Yes, she doesn’t imagine anything. With her appointment, it became clear that the CIA had become an entity controlled by the corporate elite, fulfilling its political and financial orders. Which, incidentally, is not a positive trend for world security. I wonder if the NSA is still alive there?
  41. +4
    13 March 2018 21: 07
    Hayley is full ... and this is enough to characterize it Yes
  42. 0
    14 March 2018 04: 11
    zaeb ----- dust to swallow this prafura. Russia has a specific lever-VETO! For any of their idiotic proposals. am
  43. +1
    14 March 2018 08: 13
    "A field of miracles in the land of fools" and where only the United States recruits such "politicians", their ideas are insane in their essence, for example, the so-called. opposition; any person in his right mind knows that if someone in a country who does not agree with the government takes up arms, he automatically becomes a criminal with all the ensuing consequences. The country of the parasite USA does not know the limits of meanness and hypocrisy: they even protesters of their own citizens against the arbitrariness of the authorities without shame and conscience, they simply - they simply physically destroy (for example Fergusson), and the bloody geeks who cut off people's heads on the air are declared the opposition. It seems that they have arrived and nowhere else. And it is very strange to listen to the screams and "dancing to the tambourines" of this stupid woman about the fact that the United States will "take measures" (military), but it would be for an hour in Syria, in Eastern Ghouta under the mortar shelling of "oppositionists", then the brains would instantly be aired , and without answering for anything and sitting in a warm soft chair at the UN, this hysterical can carry any nonsense!
  44. 0
    14 March 2018 12: 36
    That's all the rhetoric. nya crowned herself for the role of the Almighty. This has happened many times in the history of mankind and has ended in tears.
  45. +2
    14 March 2018 16: 26
    Stupid limited aunt, like all representatives of the State Department. It's disgusting to listen to her nonsense ...
  46. 0
    17 March 2018 19: 54
    Russian forces in Syria will be hit. Meek. You must accept this.
    1. 0
      18 March 2018 16: 03
      what is the stupid Romanian dog doing here?
    2. LIP
      0
      18 March 2018 16: 19
      You yourself believe in what you write? Or is this a joke?
      1. 0
        20 March 2018 08: 50
        The Su-24 was shot down by the Turks. No reaction. Recently "Wagnerians" were ironed by USAF. No reaction. Further on the rise. Logic suggests.
  47. +2
    17 March 2018 22: 16
    What is this lady's panic? Back in 2015, a British journalist who called the RF Ministry of Defense and asked how we would fight moderate terrorists was answered. That we will bomb them with moderate ammunition. When asked how you will define them, they answered. just as you distinguish moderate terrorists from immoderate ones.
  48. 0
    18 March 2018 16: 02
    they still want to cease fire or strike, I still do not understand
    can these generally speak in a civilized manner?
  49. LIP
    0
    18 March 2018 16: 17
    Ah, Haley, Haley, know she's strong ...
  50. 0
    18 March 2018 16: 47
    If you do not use strong expressions, then it is impossible to express the fullness of indignation. Another thing is striking. The rest of the countries in the UN Security Council will sit and look into the mouth of the United States? Are they so intimidated that the obvious, lying on the surface, tearing Syria into areas with oil deposits leave no other US interests in this Arab country?
  51. 0
    19 March 2018 09: 36
    She intends to ban, we are not Poland, stupid sheep.
  52. 0
    19 March 2018 14: 32
    Russia has to stand its ground for a long time until others understand WHY.
    Most of the foreign terrorists in Syria are US citizens

    It seems that IS is not in Syria and the genocide of the Syrian people is underway.
  53. 0
    19 March 2018 17: 42
    And why won’t they be told: shut up and know your place in Syria)
  54. 0
    20 March 2018 16: 37
    Brothers, this aunt outrages me too. Here is just one question for those who like to give forceful answers: Do you understand that these answers are paid for with the blood of our guys? Are you ready to go there and give your life? After all, the land, excuse me, is not ours... And the brotherhood is dubious... And so on the couch I’m also brave!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"