Military Review

T-90 production in Egypt will begin at the end of 2019 of the year.

41
Licensed assembly of Russian tanks T-90S / SK in Egypt is scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter of 2019, reports bmpd with reference to www.menadefense.net.




According to the resource, the Egyptian enterprise must assemble “400 T-90С / СК tanks, of which 200 will be supplied from the Russian Federation in the form of conventional vehicle sets (SKD), and also 200 - in the form of CKD sets, providing for the welding and assembly of some elements (corps and towers) ".

The build program is designed for 2019-2026 years. The build rate is 50 tanks per year.

Earlier it was reported that in the annual report of Uralvagonzavod for 2016, the list of priority areas of military-technical cooperation included “work on a project to create an enterprise for the licensed assembly of T-90С / СК tanks at the customer“ 818 ”(Egypt)”.

Reference bmpd: “Under an agreement with the United States, the Egyptian tank plant No. 1992 in Helwan is licensed to assemble the M200-XXNXX Abrams tanks from vehicle sets, which are supplied by the US against US military aid, at the Egyptian tank. From the 1 of the year to the present, the US has financed the supply of 1 vehicle sets to Egypt (the first 1992 SKD level and the rest CKD levels of different degrees of localization. Earlier, Egypt’s plans included the release of 1105-75 tanks MXNUMHA1300, but at present, the prospects for continuing to build these tanks are not quite definite, however, apparently, will continue. "
Photos used:
https://defence.ru
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Herculesic
    Herculesic 12 March 2018 13: 45
    +1
    It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!
    1. RASKAT
      RASKAT 12 March 2018 13: 48
      +11
      Well, knowing how the Egyptians work in mechanical engineering, one can quite confidently predict that, along with the machine kits, we should also send specialists and equipment there. And maybe it will be like in India, they themselves will not be taken out to observe the necessary level of quality and the contract will be reviewed in favor of the supply of finished tanks. In any case, 400 Tanks is a very large order, congratulations to RosOboronExport.
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 12 March 2018 13: 49
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

      Do you think they will attack Russia? Or our allies? What do not trust?
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 12 March 2018 14: 04
        +1
        I do not trust the Egyptians, Sadat showed how you can sell and betray!
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 12 March 2018 14: 08
          +3
          Quote: Herkulesich
          I do not trust the Egyptians, Sadat showed how you can sell and betray!

          Then the USSR provided military assistance free of charge. Now times have changed, contracts, prepayments, etc.
          1. serriy
            serriy 12 March 2018 14: 57
            +1
            You have information - how much and when will Russia receive for these tanks? Or just believe that times have changed?
            In the press about recent times and our military contracts, the information is not very:
            - we supply modern aircraft of Indonesia in exchange for palm oil and obligations to invest in the economy of Indonesia
            - we supply S-400 Turkey with our credit and the obligation to organize production there
            - Modern ships of India and we commit ourselves to invest a third of the contract for the construction of a new shipyard there.
            - .....
            hi
            1. Voyager
              Voyager 13 March 2018 17: 05
              0
              Quote: serriy
              - we supply modern aircraft of Indonesia in exchange for palm oil and obligations to invest in the economy of Indonesia

              Normal global practice, why not?
              Quote: serriy
              - we supply S-400 Turkey with our credit and the obligation to organize production there

              It is not yet known what is a big plus for us, the potential income from the transaction or the very fact of the sale of our funds to the country of NATO, which is crushed from all sides by its counterpart. If apad is furious, then we are doing everything right.
              Quote: serriy
              - Modern ships of India and we commit ourselves to invest a third of the contract for the construction of a new shipyard there.

              And this is the reality of the struggle for the market. Americans really want to chop off this piece.
          2. cats
            cats 12 March 2018 15: 39
            +3
            Quote: Chertt
            Then the USSR provided military assistance free of charge. Now times have changed, contracts, prepayments, etc.

            Recently they wrote about the industrial zone. Can it be there?
            1. Chertt
              Chertt 12 March 2018 15: 43
              +1
              Quote: Kotovsky
              Recently they wrote about the industrial zone. Can it be there?

              In general, that would be logical. All the same, all the specialists will be from Russia. At least at the initial stage (and most likely, and not only at the initial stage)
              1. cats
                cats 12 March 2018 15: 44
                +2
                Quote: Chertt
                In general, that would be logical.

                Although gentlemen, Jews said that it could not be .. lol
    3. seti
      seti 12 March 2018 13: 52
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

      And it will come to Iran, no doubt. It's a question of time.
    4. Lesorub
      Lesorub 12 March 2018 13: 53
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

      And, what trust to Iran ?? !!
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 12 March 2018 14: 08
        +6
        Quote: Lesorub
        Quote: Herkulesich
        It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

        And, what trust to Iran ?? !!



        Until now, the current Russian-Iranian (Persian) agreement 1921 is considered.

        According to it, Russia opposes foreign troops on the territory of Iran, and can also send troops into Iranian territory to protect its national interests.
        It was this treaty the USSR took advantage of when Iran was occupied in August by 1941.

        Based on this, in principle, the West will be able to limit itself exclusively to air operations, as ground invasion to allow Russia to supply weapons to the Persians despite the sanctions.

        Iran is not used yet so as not to strain Israel and the Saudis ... because the states will not only raise such a high about a nuclear deal ... And so all Middle Eastern buyers will be provided with Uralvagonzavod products laughing
        1. A. Privalov
          A. Privalov 12 March 2018 14: 40
          +3
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Lesorub
          Quote: Herkulesich
          It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

          And, what trust to Iran ?? !!



          Until now, the current Russian-Iranian (Persian) agreement 1921 is considered.

          According to it, Russia opposes foreign troops on the territory of Iran, and can also send troops into Iranian territory to protect its national interests.
          It was this treaty the USSR took advantage of when Iran was occupied in August by 1941.

          Iran still unilaterally denounced 1979 and 5 articles of the Soviet-Iranian treaty 6 of the year in 1921, according to which both parties pledged not to contain hostile troops, and in the event of a military threat to the borders, the RSFSR received the right enter its troops in Iran. hi
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 12 March 2018 14: 57
            +4
            Quote: A. Privalov
            denounced articles 5 and 6


            unilaterally and return ..
            1. ZVO
              ZVO 12 March 2018 20: 04
              +2
              Quote: vorobey
              Quote: A. Privalov
              denounced articles 5 and 6


              unilaterally and return ..


              He hasn’t returned since 1979, now why should he return? Think ...
              1. the lord
                the lord 14 March 2018 23: 10
                0
                You can ponder, Iran is again in the big game on BV. as a consequence, a negative scenario should be considered. when everything is bad and the hell is knocking at your gate. Then all the clauses of the agreement can return to their places. And help from the Russian Federation will not hurt. Well, they can do it themselves, too. Amerov and Judah this will not amplify for sure.
                1. ZVO
                  ZVO 15 March 2018 21: 44
                  0
                  Quote: znavel
                  Then all the clauses of the agreement can return to their places. And help from the Russian Federation will not hurt. Well, they can do it themselves, too. Amerov and Judah this will not amplify for sure.

                  N / t / do you consider our country a prostitute? What would any Iran take at the right moment and cast and quit?
                  He needed, not us.
                  And should our country with a smile in its Iran, the right moment to turn his back on him and protect him from America?
                  But why?

                  us that Iran is a friend?
                  The previous 100 years, he may have shown a warm relationship with Russia. Soviet Union?
                  There has never been such a thing ...
                  and never will be.
                  All Arab countries will always be bad towards non-Arab countries.
                  Always.
                  Whatever gums are kissing.
                  There are a million examples.
          2. Lex.
            Lex. 12 March 2018 22: 08
            +1
            Strange Iran states called the Great Satan and the USSR the Small
            1. Crane operator Nahamkinson
              Crane operator Nahamkinson 12 March 2018 22: 19
              +2
              Well, then who are the Jews for Iran?
              Worse than Beelzebub?
              Well, yes, according to your affairs,
              and attitude towards you !!
              1. ZVO
                ZVO 15 March 2018 21: 46
                0
                Quote: Crane Operator Nahamkinson
                Well, then who are the Jews for Iran?
                Worse than Beelzebub?
                Well, yes, according to your affairs,
                and attitude towards you !!


                Those. you just kept silent about the USSR ... They said so. you and your friends were doused with manure. but you don’t notice your dung ...
                Cool cho there ...
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 12 March 2018 14: 18
      0
      What will Israel say to this? belay
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 12 March 2018 16: 07
        +2
        So far, Saudi finances Egypt, and
        the young (relatively) saudi king wants to start
        to be friends with Israel (have seen for 70 years smile ) While the tanks are not scary.
        Unless any unforeseen Islamist coups / revolutions happen am ,
        that in the Middle East - chik-chak (as we say) ...
        1. A. Privalov
          A. Privalov 12 March 2018 17: 43
          +2
          I dare to suggest that Egypt will have the closest armed conflict with Sudan. Between Sudan and Egypt for 120 for years there has been a dispute over the ownership of the so-called. "The triangle of Halaib".
          In 1899, the UK and Egypt declared Sudan their initial. The northern border of the country was established along the 22 parallel, the city of Halaib formally fell to Egypt. In 1902, England unilaterally changed the border, transferring the "triangle" to Sudan. 12 November 1955, Sudan gained independence. In 1958, Egypt captured the area of ​​Halaib. Then the "triangle" was given to the use of Sudan. In 1992, Sudan caused extreme dissatisfaction with Egypt, giving the coast of the "triangle" to the concession of the Canadian oil company International Petroleum Corporation. In 1993 — 1994, there were armed clashes on the border of Egypt and Sudan. In 1995, Egypt sent troops to the region and took control of all the disputed lands, with the exception of the city of Halaib. In 2000, Sudan withdrew troops from Halaib, the lands were completely under Egyptian control.
          A triangle there is not frail - more than 20 thousand square meters. km
          This is all on condition that you don’t have to sneak with Iran. fellow
          1. Lord of the Sith
            Lord of the Sith 12 March 2018 19: 35
            +2
            Shalom! Always enjoy reading you. Thoughtfully and in the case write.
            I am more interested in the annual assistance of the United States, including the Abrams.
            1. A. Privalov
              A. Privalov 12 March 2018 22: 10
              +1
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              Shalom! Always enjoy reading you. Thoughtfully and in the case write.
              I am more interested in the annual assistance of the United States, including the Abrams.

              Thank. And to you, shalom! hi
              The fact is that Egypt is very important for the "national security interests" of the United States, as it controls the Suez Canal, through which up to 8% of all maritime traffic passes annually. The Suez Canal accelerates the passage of ships of the US Navy, following from the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf and back. In other words, this communication line provides connectivity to US military fleets operating in the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean. The Treaty of Egypt with Israel 1979 of the year remains one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the United States. To involve Egypt in an alliance with the United States, the Americans used the mechanism of annual economic and military aid. Let me give you some numbers for reference. From 1946 to 2016, the United States provided Egypt with external aid worth $ 77,4 billion (excluding inflation). This amount includes US military aid to Egypt.
              US military aid to Egypt goes to finance the purchase of US weapons systems and pay for the necessary services of US military contractors.
              Military aid to Egypt was first provided to the United States in the year of the Egyptian Campaign Agreement with Israel, and already in 1981, it was $ 550 million, and in 1982 - $ 900 million, in 1983 - $ 1,365 billion. Since 1983, the annual American military aid to Egypt amounts to $ 1,3 billion. In total, from 1979 to 2013, the United States provided military assistance to Egypt in the amount of $ 41,8 billion. Outwardly, the "ideology" of helping Egypt looks like this: The United States mediated a peace settlement between Israel and Egypt, so the United States provides military assistance both countries for both baking the regional balance of power and to maintain security cooperation with both countries. This is a key principle of the policy of military assistance to Egypt. Two special memoranda are attached to the 1979 peace treaty of Israel and Egypt, where the United States has set out its obligations towards Israel and Egypt. A similar mechanism since 1980-s has made Israel and Egypt the largest recipients of US military aid in the world.
              It should be understood that the US military aid to the Egyptians does not come in the form of remittances. The Egyptians do not see in their lives a single dollar allocated to them for military assistance. This is a grant program. Egypt is one of its main recipients. I will quote from the magazine on economics:
              From the financial year's 2018, US aid to Egypt goes into four categories: counterterrorism, border security, Sinai security, maritime security, and plus - to support the American weapons systems that Egypt has. In order to reorient the armed forces to "unconventional military actions", the Egyptian military needs, according to one of the estimates, large investments in rapid reaction forces, equipping infantry, optics and communications equipment with sophisticated weapons, supported by expanded observation and reconnaissance platforms. For their transportation, Egypt also needs numerous modern aviation facilities.
              There is a definite reason for the future "anti-terrorism sharpening" of the armed forces of Egypt. One of the biggest concerns over regional stability over the past few years has been the Sinai Peninsula, where radical local Bedouins, foreign and Palestinian militants from neighboring Gaza have created terrorist cells targeting both Egypt and Israel. The Ansar Beit group operating in Sinai arose after the Egyptian revolution 2011 of the year and linked itself with the Islamic State (as is known, it is forbidden in the Russian Federation).

              In other words, the United States is going to “help” Egypt not in what Cairo considers necessary. And in that Washington considers it necessary. Accordingly, the Abrams will go there or not, the Americans decide. However, since 2013, the Egyptian military has increased defense spending and entered into contracts for the supply of arms with France and Russia. Egypt bought weapons from the French for $ 9 billion, including the ill-fated Mistrals. With Russia, by more than $ 3 billion
              Our relationship with Egypt improved markedly after the 2013 coup of the year. Israel expressed significant concerns about the Islamization of Egypt. Egyptian military and police brutally suppressed street protests, killing at least 1150 demonstrators. The Muslim Brotherhood was banned, and their legal branch, the Freedom and Justice Party, was dissolved in 2014.
              And although relations with the Egyptian military are not without difficulties, we have a regular dialogue with them on defense and intelligence issues. Something like that...
              1. amr
                amr 12 March 2018 23: 12
                0
                In principle, the whole point is that the Americans crushed Egyptian power for themselves .... why the flow of text? if the meaning fits on one line?
                Americans crushed Egypt, Israel is pleased! a curtain!
    6. RASKAT
      RASKAT 12 March 2018 14: 21
      +2
      It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!
      Yes, you wait a little, the signing of documents on Iran’s accession to the EEC is planned for May, this will allow us not only to trade bypassing sanctions, but also opens up great opportunities, including infrastructure projects and many others. Here is more detailed.
      Also quite interesting material, also worth taking note.
      1. Chertt
        Chertt 12 March 2018 16: 01
        +1
        RASKAT All this looks like a wonderful fairy tale. And miracles (unfortunately) do not happen
    7. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 12 March 2018 23: 19
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      It would be better in Iran, there is no confidence in the Egyptians!

      In fact, no one needs to be trusted. But something else surprised me - and what for them so much?
      1105 Abramsov yes plus 400 T-90.
  2. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 12 March 2018 13: 45
    +1
    but in our army they where I don’t look at the parade are all m 72 and m 72
    1. figwam
      figwam 12 March 2018 13: 49
      +4
      wicked pinnochio

      And in our army at the parade and T-90 and Armata!
      1. wicked pinnochio
        wicked pinnochio 12 March 2018 13: 56
        0
        in your city you wanted to say
    2. seti
      seti 12 March 2018 13: 51
      +7
      Buy points. Or you just don’t want to see another.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Vard
    Vard 12 March 2018 13: 47
    0
    Don’t go to a fortuneteller ... get ready ... and it’s understandable why and to whom ... And the rest of the neighbors aren’t peaceful, but two thousand tanks is too much ...
  5. Serge Gorely
    Serge Gorely 12 March 2018 14: 08
    +2
    It’s not a car, but a tanker. All the same, the Jews are piling on the Arabs, even if they give them armature.
    1. serriy
      serriy 12 March 2018 15: 01
      0
      Armata? A good idea.
      After the assembly of 400 t-90 (2023), we will see there the production of Armat. drinks
      1. Lex.
        Lex. 12 March 2018 22: 11
        0
        Something can not be believed, the T-90 breakthrough 3 by -23 is not known what will happen to Egypt from the United States, it is unlikely that Russia will get help
  6. serriy
    serriy 12 March 2018 14: 39
    +2
    The amount of the transaction and the terms of payment is a great secret. Once a secret, then there is no money. Those. Russia is also giving credit to Egypt under this business. Irrevocable. Billion $ 2 somewhere (400 tanks, assembly organization).
    hi
  7. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 12 March 2018 21: 49
    +1
    Normal such help from the USA, Egypt - about 1000 Abrams ?! Why such generosity ?!
  8. Nasty
    Nasty 12 March 2018 23: 40
    0
    It’s good, we have to go all the way, it only strengthens our presence in the world. Like cockroaches, like Americans. It is necessary to make it so that without Russia, nowhere.