Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman

108
Comrade Xi Jinping can now rule the Chinese state indefinitely. The limitations previously established by the constitution are no longer present. Amendments to the constitution were approved by the National People’s Congress.


Chinese leader Xi Jinping




According to the German edition “Bild”, the Chinese leader now has the right to remain in power indefinitely. The special amendment to the constitution was approved by the All-China People’s Assembly. For it was voted almost absolute majority of the votes.

As noted by "InoTV"The National People’s Congress has lifted the deadlines for the chairman of the PRC. Chinese deputies in China have adopted an amendment to the constitution. Formerly, the head of state could count on only two terms, 5 years each.

Recently, the Central Commission of the Communist Party of China proposed to lift these restrictions. It was clear in advance that the deputies sitting in the All-China Assembly would approve the proposal.

And here's the result: out of almost three thousand deputies 2958 voted for changing the constitution. Only two were against, only three abstained.

The abolition of restrictions should serve to ensure the authority not only of Xi Jinping himself, but also of the leadership of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. In addition, the initiative aims to strengthen the national governance system.

Recall, Comrade Si is not the first decade is one of the most influential Chinese politicians. And it’s not for nothing that constitutional changes by foreign experts find the culmination point for Xi Jinping, who has rushed to his sole authority. The same “Bild” recalls that at one time, Comrade Sy tried to “eliminate the collective management system established in the state”: he appointed himself as head of the state security, finance, economic reforms, etc. This meant that the real power in the country was lost the second person in the ruling party, State Council Premier Li Keqiang. The Premier of the State Council in the People's Republic of China is, by the way, the head of the Chinese government.

Despite the predictability of the people's decision, many Chinese are shocked by the initiative of the Central Committee of the CPC and its consequences. Opponents of the "unlimited" Xi see ahead a return to violence from the time of comrade Mao. In addition, people do not like propaganda: nearly every day, the state television plays movies where the Chinese praise their great chairman.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 March 2018 07: 47
    According to the German edition of Bild, the Chinese leader now has the right to remain in power for an unlimited time.

    What is it, everyone suddenly became preoccupied with the Chinese constitution? And the Germans, with their "rotten but not dead" Madame Chancellor, generally need to be silent
    1. +8
      12 March 2018 07: 57
      Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman
      something reminds me ..
      1. +4
        12 March 2018 08: 18
        Yes, and it becomes sad, but the most interesting thing is that the United States likes it and they will quietly support the personality cult in China.
        1. +2
          12 March 2018 09: 14
          Quote: cniza
          and the most interesting thing is that the USA likes it and they will quietly support the personality cult in China.

          They don’t just like it - Trump is already clearly hinting that he likes it and that America should also think about this issue.
          1. +2
            12 March 2018 14: 12
            Trump is an old bzdunishka, sand is pouring from him, he should at least spend these two terms without a risk to his life.
      2. +6
        12 March 2018 08: 28
        I support the decisions of the Chinese comrades .. I have earned it. In everything. In domestic politics, economics, foreign policy. We would like to learn a little more from our leaders!
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman
        something reminds me ..
        1. +5
          12 March 2018 08: 37
          Quote: 210ox
          Our hands to learn a little guide!

          Yes, yes, let them learn from China how to make investments in US Treasury bonds! hi
          And yet, let them also not forget to learn how to go to the first place in the world, in debt. wink
          1. 0
            12 March 2018 09: 21
            yeah. their investment in these papers gives them a wild leverage on the states.
            1. +4
              12 March 2018 09: 42
              In the event of serious disagreements between the United States and China, the Americans will multiply this lever by zero and China will remain with candy wrappers. By the way, bonds are profitable so far on them ~ 2 percent per annum.
              1. 0
                12 March 2018 09: 57
                it depends on who is the first to start) throwing out these 8 percent to the market there will not seem to everyone.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2018 11: 02
                  The Fed will print dollars and buy all these 8%. The Fed and so 50% of these securities belong.
              2. +2
                12 March 2018 11: 32
                Quote: Grandpa Eugene
                China will stay with candy wrappers.

                And with one and a half billion people. Remind you of the mobilization reserve of the Chinese army? Somewhere around 50 million bayonets. This is just in case.
                1. 0
                  13 March 2018 13: 13
                  Quote: Orionvit
                  Remind you of the Chinese army's mobilization reserve?

                  Back in 1980, it was equal to 400 million ... belay
              3. +3
                12 March 2018 11: 45
                Quote: Grandpa Eugene
                By the way bonds profitable while they are ~ 2 percent per annum.

                Do you think so? Give me money at 2% per annum!
                It is much more profitable to lend to your business, which takes loans already at 6-8% per annum, in the same West.
                1. +1
                  12 March 2018 19: 14
                  Quote: Stas157
                  It is much more profitable to lend to your business, which takes loans already at 6-8% per annum, in the same West.

                  No no more profitable. The system of international payments is still in dollars and China is trading with the United States in 2017 ~ 500 billion $ turnover and purchases of 140 are only with the United States without other states. State bonds of China controls the renminbi against the dollar, being a "whale". As one of the results, increased rates with a high yield of 6-8% in the domestic market became possible.
                  The numerical superiority of any not only Chinese bayonets is offset by the destruction of air defense, followed by the shooting of communications from the air, fuel and lubricant depots, ammunition, and provisions. The army won’t fight much without security, the Stalingrad boiler is an example, at the present time the MLRS and artillery will tear enough infantry to pieces on foot on the approaches to work with aviation and the blind infantry will not go far. If you attack, it’s necessary to deliver 50 million bayonets overseas, the United States is the “master” of heaven and sea, if there is scenario 1 to occupy the territory of China, without the ground component the US forces can negate the PLA’s resistance, if you do not take into account the nuclear scenario. In the nuclear confrontation between the United States and China, China has fewer chances of victory than in a conventional war.
        2. +4
          12 March 2018 08: 41
          Quote: 210ox
          I support the decisions of the Chinese comrades ..


          Comrades - this is under socialism and communism !! In China, rabid capitalism ... and now also with an admixture of the emperor !!! wassat
          When C came, he put the old nomenclature into the scrap and gave new blood to the government .... now how will it be? Let's see .... Prisons in China are crowded from corrupt officials ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            12 March 2018 17: 28
            Quote: Nasr
            When C came - he put the old nomenclature into scrap

            And do you have evidence of your claim?
            1. 0
              12 March 2018 21: 17
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              Quote: Nasr
              When C came - he put the old nomenclature into scrap

              And do you have evidence of your claim?

              there is. This is a well-known fact. Search by the following names and the general contours will be clear:
              "Fighting the Reincarnation of the CCP" ..., "Great Purge" by Chairman Xi
              1. 0
                12 March 2018 22: 14
                Quote: Nasr
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                Quote: Nasr
                When C came - he put the old nomenclature into scrap

                And do you have evidence of your claim?

                there is. This is a well-known fact. Search by the following names and the general contours will be clear:
                "Fighting the Reincarnation of the CCP" ..., "Great Purge" by Chairman Xi

                Thanks, I'll take a look.
                1. 0
                  13 March 2018 10: 26
                  Shit, tell me, if the Darkest purged the government, what feelings would you have? Satisfaction? Indignation? Fright? Indifference?
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2018 10: 55
                    He will never clean, he is smart ... and I will answer for what. In place of the "stripped" come even more "hungry" and less predictable. It’s easier to keep the old elite “Faberge”. Sometimes, discarding a card from the deck - as a warning to the remaining ... obedience of which allows you to put his ideas into practice ...
                    Now is the century of scammers, starting from the household and ending with the state apparatus, and as you know, you cannot transplant everyone (outweigh) - which is what the Chinese experience says ...
                  2. +1
                    13 March 2018 11: 14
                    By the way, Putin began to introduce new people to the government ... instead of falling out of the deck ... there are also many thoughts, but now there is no time to speculate - you know ...
                    1. 0
                      13 March 2018 13: 36
                      Fuck, something in your reasoning, at first glance, is quite correct, with careful reading, not everything fits into a logical chain. Look here -
                      Quote: Nasr

                      By the way, Putin began to introduce new people to the government ... instead of falling out of the deck ... there are also many thoughts, but now there is no time to speculate - you know ...

                      If, instead of a turner fired for theft, they will replace another turner who came from another factory, will you also have “a lot of thoughts”? Further. I did not ask you whether the Darkest purge will be arranged or not. I asked how you would feel about it. After all, as I understand it, you talked negatively about the purges in China.
                      = He will never clean, he is smart ... and I will answer why. = So is it good or bad? I do not mean that - smart, but that will not conduct cleaning.
                      1. 0
                        13 March 2018 13: 59
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk

                        If, instead of a turner fired for theft, they will replace another turner who came from another factory, will you also have “a lot of thoughts”?

                        A lot of thoughts not from the fact that he is changing someone, but how ... hi
          3. 0
            13 March 2018 13: 19
            Quote: Nasr
            When C came, he put the old nomenclature into the scrap and gave new blood to the government .... now how will it be?

            When Pu arrived, he began to "shuffle" the old nomenclature on the principle of "Trishkin's caftan." He scrapped the entire industry, gave new blood to the debt obligations of a hostile state, allowed to take out more of the country than they invested in it ... now how will it be? We'll see... request
            1. 0
              13 March 2018 13: 52
              some nonsense ... obsessed with the election and Putin .. good luck! hi
        3. +3
          12 March 2018 09: 22
          Quote: 210ox
          I support the decisions of the Chinese comrades .. I have earned it. In everything. In domestic politics, economics, foreign policy. We would like to learn a little more from our leaders!

          If our students learn and go for life, then they will certainly take serfs. The villages are bent, so the cities.
        4. +2
          12 March 2018 09: 48
          Quote: 210ox
          I support the decisions of the Chinese comrades .. I have earned it. In everything. In domestic politics, economics, foreign policy. We would like to learn a little more from our leaders!

          Everything is debatable, firstly he only worked his first 5-year term, and secondly, were Deng Xiaoping or Hu Jintao worse ?! What are the talented managers in China after Xi transferred? And so the direct path to despotism, where it will lead, is unknown
          1. 0
            12 March 2018 16: 03
            Deng Xiaoping was definitely no worse.
      3. +4
        12 March 2018 09: 00
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman
        something reminds me ..

        He reminds you of Stalin, I hope so. Although maybe Brezhnev.
        1. +2
          12 March 2018 11: 20
          Quote: captain
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman
          something reminds me ..

          He reminds you of Stalin, I hope so. Although maybe Brezhnev.

          Yes, everything is better than the laborer-reformer, Tagged!
      4. +6
        12 March 2018 10: 31
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman
        something reminds me ..

        And where did you get that Comrade X will be the chairman for life? Changes in the constitution only mean that the chairman can stand for election in the third and fourth, etc. deadlines. But this amendment to the constitution does not mean the abolition of the election of the chairman and does not abolish the principle of alternative elections. So, in fact, at the next election, in principle, he may not be elected.
        But I approve of the decision of the Chinese. Changing the leader for the sake of the change itself, just because someone wrote so in the constitution is the height of idiocy. The leader, whose activities are approved by the majority of citizens, MAY remain at his post for an unlimited time. If there is a possibility at the next election to elect another leader
        1. 0
          12 March 2018 16: 04
          They have no alternative. Deputies choose the one recommended by the CPC Central Committee. Although, it is possible that alternative options are being discussed at closed plenary meetings of the Central Committee.
        2. 0
          13 March 2018 00: 22
          And where did you get that Comrade X will be the chairman for life? Changes in the constitution only mean that the chairman can stand for election in the third and fourth, etc. deadlines. But this amendment to the constitution does not mean the abolition of the election of the chairman and does not abolish the principle of alternative elections. So, in fact, at the next election, in principle, he may not be elected.
          I wanted to write about the same, but you got ahead. hi Something today at VO has especially little attention from readers to read material. request
        3. 0
          13 March 2018 13: 22
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          The leader, whose activities are approved by the majority of citizens, MAY remain at his post for an unlimited time.

          It is hard to disagree. Just don’t say that in Russia this leader is
          1. +1
            13 March 2018 14: 05
            Quote: Esoteric
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            The leader, whose activities are approved by the majority of citizens, MAY remain at his post for an unlimited time.

            It is hard to disagree. Just don’t say that in Russia this leader is

            Understand what business. I can bring a lot of arguments, quite logical, to the fact that the Darkest must leave. But these arguments will be subjective. I can give a lot of arguments, quite logical, in favor of the fact that he should stay. But these arguments will be subjective. How to be On many sites, I happened to read that the Darkest ruins the economy, leads Russia to collapse, etc. in that spirit. But if we look back and look at the state in which he accepted Russia 17 years ago and compare it with today's ... You understand me.
            One day, a now-viable Ukrainian politician, said: "The people of the USSR won the war not because of, but contrary to Stalin. =
            So I ask you a question - the changes that have occurred in Russia have occurred thanks to or contrary to Putin?
            1. +2
              17 March 2018 08: 23
              Quote: Krasnoyarsk
              thanks or contrary to Putin?

              Some in Russia think that contrary. People have a short memory, they forgot the 90s. In such cases, I always say, come here to Ukraine and see what democracy is in action. But for some reason no one is going. Of course it’s easy to scold Putin on the spot.
      5. +2
        12 March 2018 11: 22
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        something reminds me ..

        Nothing special, at all times it was, and everywhere. And so there are dynasties. Why, for example, Karl the Great, or Rurik is possible, but can not Comrade Xi Jinping? An exception may be in the countries of "triumphant democracy", but it is not the monarch who rules there, but the governor of the dominant financial-oligarchic class (president), who does not do any weather. It’s not easier for ordinary people, "horseradish is not sweeter." The main thing would be the benefit for the workers, but this is a rare case ..
    2. +9
      12 March 2018 08: 05
      This is the internal affair of China, if they are satisfied with the leader, then this should not bother anyone else, even if they pick at their "democratic" noses.
    3. +1
      12 March 2018 08: 11
      Those who voted against and abstained received this written instruction from Xi himself. Otherwise, they would not be able to bear their heads. lol
      1. +2
        12 March 2018 09: 15
        Most likely 1 against - Xi himself.
        Here they are obviously looking for a second one, an enemy of a sort of people. laughing
        1. 0
          12 March 2018 09: 52
          Second Li Keqiang ...
      2. 0
        12 March 2018 16: 05
        No, rather this is one of the deputies from Hong Kong.
    4. avt
      0
      12 March 2018 08: 40
      Quote: Chertt
      What is it, everyone suddenly became preoccupied with the Chinese constitution? And the Germans, with their "rotten but not dead" Madame Chancellor, generally need to be silent

      bully Compare horseradish ... with a finger.
      Quote: ancestors from the Don
      This is the internal affair of China, if they are satisfied with the leader,

      That's just THIS is no longer an internal matter! The Chinese elite mobilized and on March 11 took shape de jure to jump into the Big Game as a Player and a center of power. The next step, naturally peaceful, we don’t talk about the military, is the promotion of the renminbi as the reserve currency of the World.
  2. +13
    12 March 2018 07: 47
    In fact, the only people who will not give their country away are those to whom it really belongs ... Administrators they come and go ... and if you are for life, then this will not be your shit ...
    1. +1
      12 March 2018 08: 00
      and if you’re for life, then it’s yours and you will no longer be crap ...


      Everything is so ... what if the General Secretary falls into senile dementia at the age of 90 and begins to suffer from Alzheimer's disease ... what and at the next session of the Communist Party, the PRC will start to weird ... what the Chinese will do with this scourge. what
      1. +2
        12 March 2018 08: 07
        Same lech .
        and what if the General Secretary falls into senile dementia at the age of 90 and begins to suffer from Alzheimer's ..
        He will live forever. In general, he is practically a saint. laughing
      2. +5
        12 March 2018 08: 47
        The possibility of an unlimited number of re-election does not mean a lifetime of the board.
        This is in the USA, where the power is usurped by the political nomenclature of the united conservative-democratic party, and the presidents-idiots especially influence it, their power is eternal.
    2. +6
      12 March 2018 08: 05
      Vard
      In fact, the only people who will not give their country away are those to whom it really belongs ... Administrators they come and go ... and if you are for life, then this will not be your shit ...
      Well, or to be a spineless king. Have forgotten the second Nicholas?
      1. 0
        12 March 2018 15: 02
        Nobody chose Nicholas II, so your comparison is inappropriate. wink
    3. +2
      12 March 2018 08: 05
      Quote: Vard
      and if you’re for life, then it’s yours and you will no longer be crap ...

      what Khrushchev and Gorbachev, after all, were counting on a lifelong !!!
      1. +6
        12 March 2018 08: 08
        So it was necessary to satisfy their expectation, they were late with Khrushchev, but Gorbachev could still be sentenced to life, there is enough evidence of crimes. With a high degree of probability, he and his accomplice Yakovlev were recruited by foreign intelligence, according to Yakovlev there is definitely irrefutable evidence. Kryuchkov provided a report to the Politburo.
        1. +4
          12 March 2018 08: 11
          Quote: ancestors from the Don
          So it was necessary to satisfy their expectation

          laughing As there is a classic ..... here is the village, but ktozh them plant, they are GENESEC !!!
          1. +1
            12 March 2018 08: 18
            This "classic" himself fled to the West after an operation to correct his appearance, and Gorbachev, what is GENESEC now, a man who knew all the highest secrets of the state, now lives behind a hill, for this alone he should have been put on a stake.
        2. 0
          12 March 2018 16: 08
          Kryuchkov himself contributed a lot to the collapse of the social community. Ours, not by chance, contributed to the removal of a number of leaders of the socialist countries of Eastern Europe who did not want to carry out perestroika at home. But the situation got out of control, and representatives of anti-communist forces came to power.
  3. +4
    12 March 2018 07: 48
    frankly surprising, because when they developed their polit. system, they specifically decided to limit the term of the first person’s government so that, as in the USSR, it didn’t work out with the general secretaries.
    1. +3
      12 March 2018 08: 07
      Quote: K0
      frankly surprising, because when they developed their polit. system, they specifically decided to limit the term of the first person’s government so that, as in the USSR, it didn’t work out with the general secretaries.

      I have an assumption that events are coming, or very likely, in the conditions of which the process of change of power can not affect the stability of the state in the best way.
  4. +3
    12 March 2018 07: 52
    The emperor is back. Cry, moan, universal people
    1. +3
      12 March 2018 08: 47
      Elections every 5 years have not been canceled ....
  5. +2
    12 March 2018 07: 54
    Was comrade Xi Jinping became emperor Xi Jinping, the history of China goes in a circle.
    1. +1
      12 March 2018 09: 17
      Yeah, the next step is the proclamation of the Jin empire and the foundation of the imperial dynasty. laughing
    2. +3
      12 March 2018 10: 29
      Quote: cobalt
      Was comrade Xi Jinping became emperor Xi Jinping, the history of China goes in a circle.

      His Imperial Majesty is Comrade Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee. smile
  6. +6
    12 March 2018 07: 57
    Yes, God be with them, with the Chinese. They know better in China. Not one thousand years the country will understand. We would somehow have a normal life here ...
    1. +8
      12 March 2018 08: 07
      Quote: Jovanni
      We would somehow have a normal life here ...

      recourse You live in a dugout and are interrupting from bread to water ???
      1. +9
        12 March 2018 08: 34
        Quote: Serg65
        You live in a dugout and are interrupting from bread to water ???

        No, thanks to the Soviet authorities, I gave my parents a small size for free, and I live in it. Well, he manages to earn a meal. In addition to the pension, which would be enough for bread and water. But this is not my sadness, dear colleague. Right now the elections are on the way, and our President has identified the “scissors” between the richest and the poorest one of the most important problems. The trouble is that this is not the first time he has noted this. Before the election, as a rule. And for some reason, with such words of his, all sorts of faces of Chubais-Sechin-Deribaskov’s seem. How they laugh at us, and over his words ...
        1. +1
          12 March 2018 08: 47
          Quote: Jovanni
          In addition to the pension, which would be enough for bread and water.

          And how much is your pension of 700 rubles or the minimum?
          1. +2
            12 March 2018 09: 54
            And how much is your pension of 700 rubles or the minimum?

            I don’t understand your sarcasm. Thank God for 43 years of work experience (with a break for military service in the army) there can be no minimum pension. But I was not a deputy or judge either. So my initial pension is 12490 rubles. I do not die of hunger and thirst. Only we are still not animals that need enough food, drink, and, well, maybe burrows above our heads. A person has more requests. For example, I love my homeland, and I would like to ride on it. Visit Baikal, the Kuril Islands. At the Bolshoi Theater. But alas ...
            1. +1
              12 March 2018 10: 09
              Quote: Jovanni
              I do not understand your sarcasm.

              But everything is simple
              Quote: Jovanni
              which would be enough for bread and water.

              I understand you won’t be scattered for such a pension, but you can live! We took care of the security of our state we are with you(since we also participated in this and did not ache), now we have the right to expect an increase in our well-being!
              1. 0
                12 March 2018 11: 05
                one cannot live on such a pension, but eke out a miserable existence ...
            2. 0
              17 March 2018 21: 58
              Quote: Jovanni
              And how much is your pension of 700 rubles or the minimum?

              I don’t understand your sarcasm. Thank God for 43 years of work experience (with a break for military service in the army) there can be no minimum pension. But I was not a deputy or judge either. So my initial pension is 12490 rubles. I do not die of hunger and thirst. Only we are still not animals that need enough food, drink, and, well, maybe burrows above our heads. A person has more requests. For example, I love my homeland, and I would like to ride on it. Visit Baikal, the Kuril Islands. At the Bolshoi Theater. But alas ...

              Let's try to compare. Likewise, 43 years with an emergency break in the army. Under Yanukovych, a pension was accrued to me: - pension + premium "for special services to Ukraine" + Chernobyl bonus, total - 2600 hohlobaksov. At the time I received my pension, I spent a month on bread for my family a day (bread + loaf) - 160 hohlotugriks. After the last pension reform, they added 400 hryvnia to me. Total pension has become 3000 hohlorubley. But for the same bread + loaf today, I spend 600 UAH per month. In connection with the increase in income (400UAH), I cut the size of the subsidy for housing and communal services. And I began to pay 1300 hryvnias for housing and communal services (on average for three months) instead of 900 pre-reform ones. My wife does not receive a pension, because she is really young - 58 years old. Feel the difference. And also I love the Motherland, and relatives in Russia in bulk. And to go ... eh ... Only to Moscow the ticket costs 2100 UAH.
        2. +2
          12 March 2018 14: 24
          Quote: Jovanni
          Our President, one of the most important problems, identified the "scissors" between the richest and the poor

          laughing As for the "scissors" between the rich and the poor, I’ll tell you, dear colleague, an interesting story ..
          in the 1987 year in Sevastopol, one colonel served as the head of the KGB, if I am not mistaken by the name of Kondratov and he had a beautiful daughter of 22's age, everything is fine, but the daughter was lagging behind in development and very much. And the simple Soviet colonel decided to marry his daughter, offering a dowry in the form of 3-x apartment in Sevastopol, a VAZ 2007 car and full board !!!!
          Why am I doing all this? And to the fact that “scissors” were, are and always will be, and if this substance is constant, is it worth it to suffer? And according to Sechin ..... sometimes the generally accepted opinion becomes erroneous wink
          1. 0
            12 March 2018 15: 25
            Well, as it were, even now any colonel, and not just the FSB, can provide full board to both daughter and her husband ...
  7. +8
    12 March 2018 08: 01
    For a stable and guaranteed implementation of long-term programs, this is necessary. They did it right! And then, every five years, someone wants to "steer", and even a nuclear power, and even for the sake of their sponsors - political crooks and street racers!
    1. +1
      12 March 2018 08: 12
      For a stable and guaranteed implementation of long-term programs, this is necessary.

      Comrade Xi Jinping, a wise man ... secured a future for himself ... as well as his whole family.
      It seems to me that we will be present at the historical event of the formation of the SI dynasty ...
      Long live the great emperor SI.
      1. +5
        12 March 2018 09: 10
        China, from a ragged country that thirty years ago smelted metal in tens of thousands of rural horns, drove sparrows - so as not to gobble up the crops and where the scooter was considered a luxury, under the guidance of the "emperors" and the efforts of the hardworking people, it turned into one of the leaders in world industry .
        1. 0
          12 March 2018 16: 12
          It was not thirty, but fifty-five years ago. By the way, for some types of production they had solid indicators even before the start of Dan's reforms. It is not necessary to exaggerate and depict the PRC of the times of Mao and Hua Guofeng as a completely backward state. Compared to most countries in Asia and Africa, China even in the 70s. was a relatively developed state.
  8. +1
    12 March 2018 08: 08
    Comrade Xi Jinping can now rule the Chinese state indefinitely.
    China quickly moved to a new level of EMPIRE, I wonder the United States when will they follow?
    1. +4
      12 March 2018 08: 17
      Quote: svp67
      Comrade Xi Jinping can now rule the Chinese state indefinitely.
      China quickly moved to a new level of EMPIRE, I wonder the United States when will they follow?

      USA will never follow
      Any lifelong government leads to degradation and stagnation.
      because he will surround himself with a bunch of loyal friends - who will sit the same for life. and after they surround themselves the same (each has its own circle 0 - social elevators will be violated, because the whole system will be sharpened for one purpose - to preserve themselves, their privileges and the privileges of their circle.
      Nothing good will come of it.
      1. +1
        12 March 2018 08: 51
        Quote: karish
        Nothing good will come of it.

        But this is the historical path of any Empire, and the USA is the EMPIRE, in its purest form.
        Quote: karish
        USA will never follow

        At one time in republican Rome, they thought the same thing as in republican France ...
        1. 0
          12 March 2018 12: 25
          Quote: svp67
          But this is the historical path of any Empire

          I don’t know what you mean by empire - today the historical path of any empire is to fall apart and disappear
          Quote: svp67
          and the USA is EMPIRE, in its purest form.

          USA is not an empire
          An empire (from Latin imperium - power) is a monarchical state headed by an emperor or a colonial or internationally significant power, relying in its domestic and foreign policies on military estates (organized army) and acting in the interests of military estates. As a rule, an empire unites different peoples and territories into a single state with a single political center, which plays a significant role in the region or even throughout the world. The most famous empires were the Roman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, the Mongol Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and the British Empire. As of 2018, formally the last and only empire in the world is Japan.

          Quote: svp67
          At one time in republican Rome, they thought the same thing as in republican France

          At one time, they walked in bast shoes, witches burned at bonfires, etc. etc.
          Weak analogy request
      2. +7
        12 March 2018 08: 53
        And really! In a shady manner, power in Europe is exercised by clans that have a long history. The degradation of their society is obvious. The US president is almost a nominal figure; in reality, politics is formed by other non-replaceable structures. The result is the same.
      3. +5
        12 March 2018 09: 33
        Any lifelong government leads to degradation and stagnation.
        Thanks for the jokes of humor early in the morning.
        Write to Lizka of Londonobod
        1. +1
          12 March 2018 10: 17
          So they will answer you that she rules nominally, she doesn’t go into management issues laughing But I'm not one of those hiShe is also the head of 15 states Yes
    2. +3
      12 March 2018 10: 25
      Quote: svp67
      China quickly moved to a new level of EMPIRE, I wonder the United States when will they follow?

      Isn't the US an empire? There already for 150-200 years hereditarily rule empires:
      JP Morgan Chase - since 1823, CityGroup - since 1812, ExxonMobil - since 1870, Wells Fargo - since 1852. etc. Only empires are more reliable - there is money, there is power, but to pick it up, try to pick it up.
  9. +8
    12 March 2018 08: 11
    We have the same thing in Russia, only unofficially)))
    1. +4
      12 March 2018 08: 32
      Quote: Million
      We have the same thing in Russia, only unofficially)))

      tongue And thank God!
  10. +7
    12 March 2018 08: 13
    And how is it that the Chinese comrades forgot to ask permission from the "world community". request wink
    Well done !!! ... Beijing is not Belgrade, they will not bomb. (Even if there are no video cameras at polling stations).
  11. +5
    12 March 2018 08: 30
    Despite the predictability of the decision of the people's representatives, many Chinese are shocked by the very initiative of the CCP Central Committee and its consequences.
    It is said as if X was some kind of usurper ...
    The Chinese are happy that he is in power, the people love him and it is logical that the leader with his skills and talents should rule his whole life. Under his rule, China came out on the first place in the economy, rose in the military and political sense.
  12. +7
    12 March 2018 08: 42
    The Chinese are aware that the world around them is far from safe for both China and the Chinese.
    Three thousand people voted to maintain the "status quo".
    Such a country as China, if it is spread, will create so many problems for all neighbors, including the Russian Federation, that it will not seem enough.
    Just imagine for a moment the flow of refugees of 10-15 million people to our Far East. What do we do?
    And imagine all the charms of the transition period if “democratic values” prevail (the dashing 90s in Russia). The triads in China today are in a tight bridle.
    It is during such periods that crime tries to make sure that nothing threatens it.
    Imagined millions of gangs from neighbors.
    Neither sell nor buy.
    And the flow of drugs from China to the Russian Federation.
    So let Comrade X sit in his place.
    We will be calmer.
  13. +1
    12 March 2018 08: 42
    how it does not look like Russia ..
  14. 0
    12 March 2018 09: 11
    Most likely poison No.
    1. +1
      12 March 2018 09: 35
      If liberalists are caught and shot, nothing will happen
  15. +4
    12 March 2018 09: 29
    Recently I watched a story about the history of China, where a man told me that 30 years ago it was happiness for him to buy new socks. And now looking at China, I just want to .... In any large Chinese city there are so many skyscrapers that Moscow City seems to be a wretched village compared to them. I no longer take Shanghai or Guangzhou.
    Communicating with the Chinese, I realized that as people with imperial thinking, they only respect strong personalities, so they need a king and emperor. Therefore, they love Putin. And X will not live up to Alzheimer as a politician. Now there are many strong clans, and as soon as you lose your grip, immediately retire.
  16. +1
    12 March 2018 09: 34
    It’s time for us to do so, but it’s much better. Abolish the terms for the president and Putin rule until the end and appoint lifelong Prime Minister Medvedev. Then we will have peace, stability and confidence in the future. As was the case with the USSR. Lying on the savings book 12000 rubles -they will lie tomorrow too. And you knew that nothing would change and waited for a distant beautiful future. So it is necessary now. In the evening you go to bed and know that tomorrow you will be the same poor and wake up. And no one will throw you stupid temptations about decades of victories and a great future for generations.
  17. 0
    12 March 2018 09: 39
    One belt, one way. The logical continuation of the strategy.
    1. 0
      12 March 2018 10: 15
      Quote: Razvedka_Boem
      One belt, one way.

      one chairman
  18. 0
    12 March 2018 09: 46
    Meet the lifelong Chinese chairman

  19. +2
    12 March 2018 10: 04
    Typical magazine news feed. Fry to a burnt crust, so that there is more stock, and serve to the table - here, fry hot. Ugh.
    The restriction for two consecutive terms was canceled. The elections themselves every 5 years have not been canceled.
  20. +3
    12 March 2018 10: 14
    Well done, the Chinese do not bother with verbiage such as "democracy." Everything is simple there: a stable government - a stable state - a stable economy - a way to improve the welfare of the people. And judging by their pace of development, they are right.
  21. 0
    12 March 2018 10: 16
    But what about "DEMOCRACY" ??? where are the statements about caring for the Chinese people ??? something is silent and as if by ears .... and if power in China will be inherited, can it be considered a republican monarchy?
  22. 0
    12 March 2018 10: 33
    The Central Committee and other government posts in China have always changed after a certain period of time to other people, regardless of the results. And here is a departure from tradition, no matter how bad ...
  23. +1
    12 March 2018 10: 45
    judging by the discussion of the article, we have only democrats on the site, well, there a couple of people supported the initiative of China, evil partocrats ...)))
    The article says that it became possible to be re-elected every 5 years without limiting the number of terms. It’s good indeed on the other hand, if the government is engaged in the development of the state, then really, the population will have confidence in the future ... It’s bad that the authorities can go wild and ruin the country with their behavior, as the Soviet Union collapsed at one time. So the great C will need to periodically "replay the whole parliament" ... You can pay attention that we do not have confidence in the future, these constant elections and changes in direction do not allow us to live in peace. And what will happen to China, let's see in the future, maybe it will be necessary to repeat their scheme, but with their interest.
  24. 0
    12 March 2018 11: 11
    it will not end in anything good, but the truth is we won’t know about it ...
  25. +3
    12 March 2018 12: 54
    What is unusual or new? The dynasties of emperors are Qing, Shan, Great Mao and Dan. They chose for a long time, now it’s Xi’s turn. China has not changed its traditions for centuries! Their historical experience tells them that the supreme power should be personified,
    and not smeared with an endless leapfroke of irresponsible "spectacular managers from politics", which not only tires, but also cools! If we changed dads and mothers every 4-5-6 years, then everyone would be orphans!
  26. 0
    12 March 2018 14: 48
    No, no, no ..- this is by no means a "cult of personality", it's just ... well, such a "production" need: well, ... there is a right "vector" of development, a "power vertical" to support and all that .... We are waiting in Russia. wink
    1. +1
      12 March 2018 19: 28
      If you want to buy a magnet or icon with C in China, you will have to try very hard. On TV it is shown within the normal range. Chips or noodles are shown an order of magnitude more often. Such a cult of personality
  27. 0
    13 March 2018 07: 31
    Quote: Dormidont
    If liberalists are caught and shot, nothing will happen

    like mad dogs and very contagious
  28. 0
    13 March 2018 07: 36
    Quote: Snail N9
    No, no, no ..- this is by no means a "cult of personality", it's just ... well, such a "production" need: well, ... there is a right "vector" of development, a "power vertical" to support and all that .... We are waiting in Russia. wink

    And will you wait? I’m embarrassed to ask, in the place of events, or how? If "ali how" - then we’ll figure it out without you, the king needs us, or we don’t need ... this is OUR, not a dog’s business ... these are the twists of fate
  29. 0
    13 March 2018 14: 11
    Nasrat,
    So how does he change them? What amazing technology is it that makes you so nervous? Why do you have soaps in your head like bees in a hive?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"