Military Review

West - "the world-vampire"

53
80 years ago, 12 March 1938, the German troops invaded Austria. Austrian troops were ordered not to resist. The new Austrian government of Zeiss Inquart decided on the accession of Austria to Germany.


March 14 Hitler signed a decree on the unification of Austria with the Third Reich. England and France, the former guarantors of the independence of Austria, did nothing to protect it. The British and French governments only handed over notes of protest condemning the "pressure" of Germany on Austria. These notes were ostentatious, so Berlin calmly ignored them. This was due to the fact that the owners of France, Britain and the United States at this time, in fact, did everything to surrender almost all of Europe to Hitler (in the end, even France was surrendered). Hitler created the “Eternal Reich” on the basis of Europe (the “European Union”) and was actively assisted in this in order to throw the united European civilization against the “solar” Soviet civilization. The masters of the West were afraid of the Soviet project based on social justice, ethics of conscience, a society of service and creation. Hitler was allowed and helped to bend under him most of Europe, and secretly made it clear that there would be no “second front” this time. Germany can quietly get rid of Soviet Russia, get “living space” at the expense of it and once and for all solve the “Russian question” for the West - destroy the Russian superethnos.

prehistory

After the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire as a result of the First World War, the Austrian state appeared on the political map of Europe. Previously, Vienna and Berlin vied for leadership in Germany. With the birth of the Second Reich (1871 year), Berlin was able to lead most of the German lands. However, the Habsburg Empire still had power at the expense of Slavic, Hungarian, Italian and other lands. In 1919, Vienna lost most of its territory, population and resources. Austria has become a weak state, losing most of its industrial capacity and agricultural land. It is not surprising that the movement for the reunification of the German people, who found themselves in two states - Germany and Austria, was very strong. Especially in the period immediately after the war, when the people experienced a tremendous shock after the collapse of the Habsburg Empire, defeat in the war and the collapse of the former way of life, when Vienna and Austria ceased to be the center of a huge European empire. In 1930-s, when life gradually adjusted and the memory of the empire began to go into the past, the idea of ​​the Anschluss with Nazi Germany began to lose its former popularity.

The movement for reunification was artificially restrained by the victor countries. The texts of the Versailles and Saint-Germain treaties (1919) and the Geneva Protocols (October 1922) contained articles prohibiting the Anschluss. In March 1931, the governments of Germany and Austria made a proposal for a customs union. However, the victorious countries resisted this. Thus, while the owners of the West needed a weak, humiliated Germany, they interfered with the unification of Berlin and Vienna. And they had every opportunity to continue to restrain the desire of revanchist circles in Germany.

But the world situation has changed completely. The USSR showed fantastic results in the development of the country and the people. Russia did not die after world war, two revolutions and troubles, becoming a colony of the West, but revived as a phoenix bird. She showed the world a new development project - an alternative to a Western one. A fair, “sunny” project of a future human civilization, where an ordinary person is not a “two-legged tool” and an animal consumer, but a creator, a creator of a new reality. The situation was extremely dangerous for the owners of the West. Their “new world order” collapsed - the slave-owning, caste world, with the division of people into the caste of the “elect” and the caste of slaves and servants (including the intellectual).

At the same time, the capitalist (colonial predatory) system experienced a new brutal crisis. The western capitalist system is based on constant expansion, when the core of the capsystem gets the opportunity to rob and develop more and more new territories and peoples. When the “living space” is exhausted, “breaking” begins. In fact, the West is a vampire world that constantly needs “blood” - resources, energy for a normal existence. The West was constantly expanding and flourishing until the end of the 19th - early 20th centuries, when it was shaken by the first severe crisis. To solve the problems was organized world war. She allowed to bring down the Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Turkish empires, to feast at their expense, to master their fragments.

However, the trophies were coming to an end, Russia could not be completely destroyed and colonized, and in the 1930s the Western world was again on the verge of a severe crisis. The crisis has hit the United States especially hard, which at this time became the economic, military, and political leader of the Western world. Were drawn into the quagmire of crisis, England and France. Germany, Italy and Japan suffered less. The masters of the West needed a “big sacrifice” in order to prolong the existence of it and at the same time complete the enslavement of the planet, humanity, to establish their world order, a non-slave-owning civilization, once and for all. For this it was necessary to kill and rob the USSR-Russia. At the same time, they again set off Russians with the Germans and Japanese, strangling competitors in the most western project - Germany and Japanese civilization in the East, which modernized on the basis of Western achievements of science and technology, but retained its own identity. Along the way, to maintain control over huge China and India. In addition, the United States and Britain sought to turn Europe (Old World) into a battlefield in order to win up over the old European houses, including the ancient “command center” of the West - Rome.

The United States and Britain abandon the policy of political, military and economic suppression of Germany. They secretly support Hitler and his party, leading them to the pinnacle of power. Germany can restore the military-industrial, economic potential. Germany is allowed to violate the conditions of the Versailles system, although until the collapse of France there were all diplomatic, military and economic opportunities to stop the aggression and expansion of the Third Reich. As a result, the European states, which naively believed that they are “partners” and allies of Paris and London, are beginning to feed Berlin. Practically everything will allow Hitler to begin a new “onslaught to the East” of a united Europe headed by Germany. The Western masters also pursued a similar policy with regard to Italy and Japan, allowing the Italian fascists to plunder in the Mediterranean basin, and the Japanese militarists in the Pacific and the Far East.

Thus, the masters of the West did everything to create three centers of world war - Germany, Italy and Japan, and so that they would start the struggle for a new division of the world. Three aggressive powers acted as figures in the Great Game, starting the world massacre. But the real winners and architects of the new world order were supposed to be the masters of England and the USA. In the role of the main victim saw - the Soviet civilization. The death of the Soviet Union and its plunder was supposed to allow Britain and the United States to create a global neo-slave-owning civilization. Germany and Japan, having unleashed a global war, also became victims at the final stage, were plundered. As a result, Germany and Japan either disappeared altogether from the world arena, or remained weakened in a tap. For example, the Anglo-Saxons had plans for the dismemberment of Germany, the complete elimination of its economic potential. And only the tough stance of Moscow in the year 1945 allowed to save Germany.

It is not surprising that for a long time the West did not see anything bad and terrible in Italian fascism and German Nazism. They only continued the Western tradition of racism, social Darwinism and their basis - the Protestant and Old Testament ideology with the division of people into "elected" (rich) and "unlucky subhumans". Hitler has long been the most popular politician in Western Europe. Fascism and Nazism were supposed to help in the struggle against the workers and the communist movement in Europe, to uproot the "red plague".

For these reasons, the owners of France, England and the United States sacrificed the national interests of their countries (in particular, they gave France to Hitler) for the sake of supranational, global interests. The masters of Paris, London and Washington did everything to drown Moscow’s attempts to create a collective security system in Europe. So that Germany, Italy and Japan could quietly realize their plans for preparing for a big war. To incite Germany and Japan on the USSR, the Western powers pursued a policy of "non-intervention", condoning the aggression of Rome, Berlin and Tokyo.

Obviously, Hitler and his entourage were well aware that France, Britain and the United States were more afraid of the “communist threat” than fascism and Nazism. Fascism and Nazism were typical manifestations of the Western world. The domination of the "chosen nations" over others. It was obvious that the Anglo-Franco-American "appeasers" would try to come to terms with Berlin, first at the expense of the weak states of Europe, and then of Russia. Germany will expand the "living space" to the East.

The first goal for the German Fuhrer was Austria and Czechoslovakia. The seizure of the most developed fragments of the former Austro-Hungarian empire made it possible to solve the problem of the unity of the German nation and create a strategic base for further expansion. Hitler correctly calculated that the owners of England and France had already written off Austria and Czechoslovakia. Therefore, in Berlin they were confident that if they were properly prepared and found a suitable pretext for the German invasion of Austria and Czechoslovakia, it would get away with them with impunity.

How London "appeased" Hitler

England at this time supported the course of the agreement with Germany. After concluding a maritime agreement with the German government in 1935, London began a revision in favor of Berlin of the restrictive military articles of the Versailles Treaty. London expressed its willingness to provide new long-term loans and to agree on the delimitation of spheres of influence and markets. Such an attempt was made by the British Foreign Office through industrialist Rickens at the beginning of 1937. In a conversation with the German ambassador to Austria, von Papen, Rickens developed the idea of ​​incorporating the Reich into the world economy by providing it with sales markets and a long-term loan on preferential terms to stabilize the German economy. The loan was granted for approximately 40 years with a negligible interest rate and was partially given in gold to ensure the stability of the brand. In countries where the German market was declining, it was proposed to reduce duties. Germany was also promised a settlement of the colonial question, on the one hand not to violate the interests of Britain, and on the other - to collectively compensate Germany on the west coast of Africa. In addition, London could agree on a customs union between Germany and Austria.

In May, Neville Chamberlain came to power in England in England. The main course of his foreign policy was to achieve reconciliation with Germany and Italy and create a pact of four. A special concern of the British Prime Minister was the achievement of a broad Anglo-German agreement. To this end, Lord Halifax was sent to Germany in November 1937. The meeting between Hitler and Halifax was held in Obersalzberg 1937 on November 19. London endorsed Hitler’s policies to end democracy and defeat the labor movement. According to Halifax, Germany "can rightfully be considered the bastion of the West against Bolshevism." The British government noted the "great merits of the Fuhrer" and proposed to create conditions for "a comprehensive and frank discussion of all issues of interest to the two countries." Halifax stated that "no possibility of changing the existing situation should be excluded ...". England agreed to satisfy Hitler’s claims at the expense of Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Danzig, on condition that the redrawing of the political map of Europe in favor of Germany would proceed “peacefully” and gradually. However, Hitler wanted more - the solution of the colonial question in favor of Germany. And this was a sore point for England. Therefore, it was not possible to immediately reach an agreement.

However, these negotiations gave Hitler to understand that London is ready to give Austria, Czechoslovakia and Danzig to Germany. Obviously, England will also be glad if Germany goes further to the East in order to fight with "Bolshevism." France, without the support of England, would also not oppose the expansion of the German sphere of influence.

Therefore, Berlin began to speak in a tone of ultimatums. 26 January 1938, in a conversation with the British Ambassador Genderson, German Foreign Minister Neurath said that Germany would not tolerate England’s interference with Austria. London was silent on this defiant statement by Neurath, although he had every reason to reject it, referring to the articles of the Versailles and Saint-Germain agreements. Berlin at this time could not confirm his words with military power. Moreover, London closed its eyes to the conclusion of the Berchtesgaden Protocol on February 12 of the year 1938, according to which the Austrian Chancellor Schuschnigg actually signed the surrender of Vienna. Despite the demand of Hitler to include in the Reich 10 million Germans living outside of Germany, Chamberlain continued the policy of "appeasement."

Thus, London began to hand over Western Europe to Hitler, so that the Führer would have the opportunity to organize a "crusade" of the West to the East.

West - "the world-vampire"

Residents of Vienna Welcome Adolf Hitler

To be continued ...
Author:
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. solzh
    solzh 12 March 2018 06: 21
    +1
    The Anglo-Saxons have always dreamed of capturing, enslaving Russia, including with the wrong hands.
    1. rkkasa xnumx
      rkkasa xnumx 12 March 2018 07: 31
      +1
      Quote: solzh
      Anglo-Saxons have always dreamed of capturing, enslaving Russia

      In fairness - not only the Anglo-Saxons, and not only Russia. In the role of invaders who was not there: Spanish-French-Germans-Portuguese-Japanese; and in the role of prey: China-India-Vietnam-Korea-Africa-America, there are a lot of examples.
      By the way, Russia was also not always white and fluffy (see China of the XNUMXth century).
    2. Gloomy
      Gloomy 12 March 2018 07: 54
      +3
      And I must say, they have achieved their goal: just look at where most of the Russian "elite" holds their accounts, families and real estate.
    3. Looking for
      Looking for 12 March 2018 15: 18
      -1
      They didn’t want to capture Russia, it was too tough for the British or the French, nor the rest. But to weaken it as much as a political and economic player in the world arena is “sacred” of British politics. By the way, it’s not only about Russia. to create mistrust. to bribe, scold, and then - "carry chestnuts out of the fire with their own hands"
  2. Korsar4
    Korsar4 12 March 2018 06: 23
    +6
    Unfortunately, again the slogans.
    There are a lot of examples of joining in history. And you don’t have to go far for them.
    And it’s dangerous to draw universal analogies. Although with the fact that the western version of development is a struggle for resources. And they are limited, you can’t argue.
  3. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 12 March 2018 06: 33
    +6
    Here it is purely in general, without privacy, I agree with Samsonov yes
    The true aspirations of the West towards us are too obvious. Not only does the history of recent years 100-150 prove this, but modern different kinds of strangulation look very eloquent what yes
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 12 March 2018 12: 39
      +2
      Everything would have been fine in the author’s reasoning, but one question tormented me: why in the beginning of the 30s start collecting an all-European crusade against a country for which the union of Poland, Romania and Japan was overkill almost until the end of the 30s? Against a country that was considered an object of European politics back in 1938, and which may not even be invited to a conference at which the fate of a state connected with the USSR was decided by an agreement, it is enough to simply inform that that state will be divided.
      We really love to project solely on ourselves the preparation of the Reich for a big war, while completely losing sight of intra-German and intra-European politics, as well as one overseas player. Some have dreamed of a revenge for a treacherously lost war ("we would have won if it hadn't been a stab in the back"). Some people needed a counterweight in Europe for their favorite European political games within the framework of checks and balances, so unsuccessfully violated by Versailles. And some dreamed of a big war in Europe, during which you can first earn money and at the end of which its participants will be entangled in debt, with a killed economy and falling off colonies.
      And the distant USSR in these games was taken into account only as a scarecrow for the Reich, an imitation of the Allied negotiations with which would force the Reich to soften its position on Poland. Or as the last hope of England and its last possible ally on the continent, the inevitably quick defeat of which will cause the limes to seek peace.
  4. moskowit
    moskowit 12 March 2018 06: 36
    +4
    actively contributed to abandon the united European civilization against the “sunny” Soviet civilization. The masters of the West were afraid of the Soviet project, based on social justice, ethics of conscience, a society of service and creation.

    This is true, but the root cause is much deeper and more complex ...
    Everything is explained by the fantastic wealth of our Motherland .... Now, "wild capitalism" has developed in the country in all its glory, and the policy against our country has remained the same, as it was in the pre-war ...
    1. Korsar4
      Korsar4 12 March 2018 06: 46
      +3
      Do you think time and space once were different?
      Just someone was interested in cocoa grains and Quetzal bird feathers. Someone gold, someone earth.

      "You have a long spear -
      The right has become yours "(c).
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Olgovich
    Olgovich 12 March 2018 06: 47
    +6
    х
    ozyaeva france, England and the United States at this time, in fact, did everything to surrender almost all of Europe to Hitler (in the end even surrendered France)
    How's that?
    Self-sacrifice ... of yourself ?! Why then sacrifice if you are not? request
    in the 1930s, the Western world was again on the verge of a tough crisis.

    But the consumption there of meat, milk, etc. per person was several times higher than in the USSR, where there was no crisis (Report of the Central Statistical Bureau of the USSR, 1955)
    up to the collapse of France, there were all diplomatic, military and economic opportunities to stop the aggression and expansion of the Third Reich.

    Without Russia? There is no chance: without Russia’s participation, there was NOT and never is peace in Europe! But she was not in the Versailles system of the world because of Brest betrayal
    For example, the Anglo-Saxons had plans for the dismemberment of Germany, the complete elimination of its economic potential. Only Moscow’s tough stance in 1945 saved Germany.

    Gruabya mistake-left a monster who killed tens of millions of our citizens alive. Now he is AGAIN- at the forefront of Europe against Russia.
    A few electors in the place of Germany would be much better.
    London was silent on January 26 1938 years to this defiant statement of Neurath, although he had every reason to reject it, citing articles Versailles and Saint Germain agreements.

    Hitler was from Versailles back in 1933 году request
    But England and France categorically did not want to fight, remembering the wild losses of the WWII.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 12 March 2018 08: 12
      +1
      Governance of the World is a little different than you imagine.
      The violent Christianization of Europe, when the local elite was burned at the stake of the Inquisition, and their place was occupied by newcomers, led to the fact that Europe was divided into states in which their leaders were from the same tribe, all of them to one degree or another relatives. After the revolution of 1917, it was not their man who was at the helm of Russia. They did not like it much ...
      Regarding the WWII and other wars. Wars start not only due to lack of resources. When the shepherds, with local wolves, are not able to more effectively control their herd, they attract wolves from neighboring states for this, while solving obedience issues, they don’t unite people around the leader like a common enemy, the question of “recycling” especially violent and the issue of herd size.
      This is not affecting the issue of the banking system, which belongs to all the same.
      1. Lieutenant Teterin
        Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 08: 30
        +8
        Quote: Boris55
        Violent Christianization of Europe, when the local elite was burned at the stake of the Inquisition, and their place was occupied by newcomers, pr

        Dear, in what world do you live in general? The Christianization of Europe is the first millennium after the birth of Christ, and the Inquisition is the second millennium. And please consider that the number of those killed after the inquisitors' sentences was orders of magnitude smaller than those who died from diseases, wars and crop failures in those years.
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 12 March 2018 09: 02
          0
          Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
          The Christianization of Europe is the first millennium after the birth of Christ, and the Inquisition is the second millennium.

          Not when nothing is done simultaneously.
          The first Ecumenical Council in the history of the Christian Church opened on May 20, 325 in Nicaea (now the city of Iznik on the territory of Turkey). It was convened by the Roman emperor Constantine I in order to stop the debate over the "Arian heresy" that torn apart all Eastern Christianity.
          After the Christians gained strength, in 1215, the Inquisition was created by Pope Innocent III (in Russian, the wanted list).
          Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
          And please consider that the number of those killed after the inquisitors' sentences was orders of magnitude smaller than those who died from diseases, wars and crop failures in those years.

          Who told you this? So with the advent of these - it all started. The newcomer who usurped power did not give a damn about the natives.
          1. Lieutenant Teterin
            Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 09: 30
            +6
            You do not see that between the year 325 and the year 1215, a gap of 900 years? Filled with dozens of works of the Church Fathers, the Baptism of Europe, the Great Schism, when Roman Catholics broke away from a single Church, and a whole lot of events.
            Christianity came to pagan lands with a few preachers. And these local elites perceived the teachings of Christ and Baptism from Christian bishops. There were no "newcomers" at all. Clovis, Emperor Constantine, Prince Vladimir, the Ostrogoth and Lombard kings, Prince Meshko — these were rulers, flesh from the flesh of their people.
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 12 March 2018 09: 35
              0
              Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
              Emperor Constantine

              Constantine wanted to save the Roman Empire from collapse - it did not work out.
              Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
              There were no "newcomers" at all. Clovis, Emperor Constantine, Prince Vladimir,

              That's just about Vladimir, the son of a Jewish woman, Malki - is not necessary. Read about the institute of Jewish wives.
              1. Lieutenant Teterin
                Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 09
                +5
                Quote: Boris55
                Constantine wanted to save the Roman Empire from collapse - it did not work out.

                With the eastern part of the empire, he quite succeeded.
                Quote: Boris55
                That's just about Vladimir, the son of a Jewish woman, Malki - is not necessary.

                I beg you, do not read the neopagan opus. There is no truth in them.
                Most scholars agree that the annalistic Malk was a Drevlyan prince, a Slav. This is precisely the reason why his children got into the service of Princess Olga - they were “hostages” taken to the prince’s court after Olga subjugated the Drevlyans and imprisoned their prince Mal (Malka), whom the Drevlya married Olga as husbands immediately after the assassination of Prince Igor (Novgorod First Chronicle )
                That is why the Drevlyansky prince was honored in the annals, and not because the ordinary Jew from Lubech “Apparently, [...] gave them [his children] a good education for those times”. That is why the illegitimate youngest (!) Son of Svyatoslav was recognized by Olga, as he had a noble birth (Svyatoslav did not marry Malush, as the “theory” claims - she was his concubine). And precisely because of this noble origin, Dobrynya got the opportunity of a military career.

                https://voronkov-kirill.livejournal.com/84008.htm
                l
                Please study the history, and not the crafts of Russophobia from the 90s.
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 12 March 2018 10: 17
                  0
                  Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
                  I beg you, do not read the neopagan opus. There is no truth in them.

                  Yes, yes, yes ... and the fall of Persia due to the woman is the same invention, but purim is still celebrated ...

                  1. Lieutenant Teterin
                    Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 31
                    +6
                    One question: how do events in Persia a few hundred years before the birth of Christ relate to real the story of Prince Vladimir and the refutation of neopagan slander against him?
                    1. Boris55
                      Boris55 12 March 2018 10: 32
                      0
                      Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
                      how events in Persia a few hundred years before Christmas correlate with the real story of Prince Vladimir

                      The methods are the same. They operate to this day.
                      1. Lieutenant Teterin
                        Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 53
                        +6
                        If you have problems with logic, I repeat: what does Vladimir, born of the daughter of a Slavic prince, have to do with that Persian history?
                      2. Boris55
                        Boris55 13 March 2018 09: 04
                        0
                        Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
                        What does Vladimir, born of the daughter of a Slavic prince, have to do with that Persian story?

                        Malka, in the translation - the queen, was one of the "Jewish brides" and if you know, the Jewish family tree goes by mother including not born from a Russian prince and that’s why he’s Russian, but he was born a Jew, and therefore he is a Jew who planted the Judeo-Christian religion in Kiev. Another photo for thought is closer to our time:

                        By the way. Stalin’s wife was killed, Putin and his wife divorced - it’s amazing how the country develops with bachelors.
      2. Olgovich
        Olgovich 12 March 2018 09: 10
        +2
        Quote: Boris55
        Governing the World is a little different than you imagine it.

        Tell me how I represent him yes
        Quote: Boris55
        Violent Christianization of Europe, when the local elite was burned at the stake of the Inquisition, and their place was taken aliens

        Who are the newcomers? The rapists, who?
        Quote: Boris55
        Europe was divided into states in which their leaders were from one tribe

        Name "TRIBE" lol
        Quote: Boris55
        When the shepherds, with local wolves, are not able to more effectively control their herd, they attract wolves from neighboring states for this, while solving obedience issues, they don’t unite people around the leader like a common enemy, the question of “recycling” especially violent and the issue of herd size.

        Why could the shepherd, could, and could not! belay Wolves are allies of shepherds? request Are foreign wolves attracted, but not foreign shepherds? How do foreign shepherds relieve their wolves and cope with their herds?
        Some questions .... request
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 12 March 2018 09: 28
          0
          Quote: Olgovich
          Tell me how I represent him

          You know better what you represent, but judging by what you write, it turns out that some rulers are in no way connected with others - in your opinion they are initially enemies, although in fact - "... kings can do everything, but here to marry for love ... "
          Quote: Olgovich
          Who are the newcomers? The rapists, who?

          The bearers of the Biblical concept - the vehicles of which are Jews, are governed throughout the world through a rabbinate controlled by globalists.
          Quote: Olgovich
          Why could the shepherd, could, and could not!

          Because you can’t fool the people forever, but oh, it’s like a hunt to parasitize ... True, it will always find a way.
          Quote: Olgovich
          Wolves are allies of shepherds?

          Wolves are the power structures of parasites.
          Quote: Olgovich
          Foreign wolves are attracted, but no foreign shepherds?

          Relatives will agree with each other, though not always - the second Nicholas was surrendered in the hope of tearing Russia apart. It didn’t work right away - they are still trying.
          Quote: Olgovich
          How do foreign shepherds relieve their wolves and cope with their herds?

          At present, with the advent of nuclear weapons that can destroy them too - anti-human culture is being cultivated, GMO products, drugs, etc. are being introduced ... in general, genocide weapons are used - alcohol, tobacco, drugs.
          The population for them is just a biological resource, the same as gas or oil. Too large a percentage of loafers leads to revolutions and other troubles.
          1. Lieutenant Teterin
            Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 09: 35
            +6
            Quote: Boris55
            The bearers of the Biblical concept - the vehicles of which are Jews, are governed throughout the world through a rabbinate controlled by globalists.

            Are you anti-Semite? I remember one man, too, all shouted about the "Jewish conspiracy." Hitler was his name. Are you in agreement with him?
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 12 March 2018 09: 37
              +1
              Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
              Are you anti-Semite?

              No. Jews are using. I even feel sorry for them somewhere. And by the way - Jewish blood flowed in Hitler’s blood and he destroyed only those Jews who assimilated with the locals. Read about the cutting of the dry branches of Israel expressed by the first head of state of Israel.
              1. Lieutenant Teterin
                Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 09
                +5
                What can I say ... only this:
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 12 March 2018 10: 24
                  +2
                  Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
                  What can I say ...

                  If you are too lazy to look for yourself - read:

                  “... When Chaim Weizmann, later becoming the first president of Israel, was offered to ransom Jews in German concentration camps, he cynically replied:“ All these Jews are not worth a drop of a Palestinian cow. ”Weizmann called the“ cutting of dry branches. ”Statements by Chaim Weizman, those of 1937 clearly demonstrate the terrifying nature of the Holocaust: "I ask the question: Are you able to resettle 6 million Jews in Palestine? I answer: No. From the tragic abyss I want to save only 2 million young ... And the old should disappear ... They are dust, economic and spiritual dust in a cruel world ... "
                  1. Lieutenant Teterin
                    Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 32
                    +4
                    Excuse me, did the source of this quote prevent you from being modest?
                    1. Boris55
                      Boris55 12 March 2018 10: 34
                      0
                      Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
                      Sorry, source of this quote.

                      So that there would be no more bad questions for me - from the very beginning I suggested that you find this information yourself. Perhaps now you will bother to do this. hi
                      1. Lieutenant Teterin
                        Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 10: 54
                        +4
                        This means that you have no source. I do not intend to do the work for you to prove your position.
                    2. BAI
                      BAI 12 March 2018 11: 12
                      0
                      Of the 208 million search results, it’s easy to find the following:
                      Now turn to a curious book: “Holocaust victims are being blamed. Documents and testimonies of Jewish war criminals ”(New York, 1977).

                      The American rabbi M. Schonfeld wrote this book. Rabbi Schonfeld is convinced that none other than the Swiss Zionists brought Adolf Hitler to power over the German people, and then gave him the money necessary for militarizing Germany.

                      It was their joint project with the English royal court, which pursued the goal - the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. This task, together with Hitler, was solved by the leader of the Zionist project Chaim Weizmann who lived in Switzerland. Rabbi Schonfeld calls him in his book one of the main war criminals.


                      In 1937, when there was no Israel, this Chaim Weizman, as president of the World Zionist Organization (1921-1931,1935-1946), asked his like-minded and associates in the Zionist party: “I ask: Are you able to resettle six million Jews to Palestine? I answer: No. From the tragic abyss I want to save two million young ... And the old must disappear ... They are dust, economic and spiritual dust in a cruel world ... Only a young branch will live ”(Shonfeld M“ The Holocaust Victims Accuse. Documents and Testimony on Jewish War Criminals. NY, 1977. P. 25.).

                      .
                      1. Lieutenant Teterin
                        Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 11: 30
                        +6
                        I did not find information about Rabbi Schonfeld. It seems to me that this book is similar in its reliability to the “protocols of the Zion of the wise men” included in the list of extremist materials
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich 12 March 2018 11: 16
            +2
            Quote: Boris55
            You know better what you imagine

            Of course, but it was you who said that you knew my idea. I wanted to knowrequest
            Quote: Boris55
            The bearers of the biblical concept - the guides of which are Jews

            Jews forcibly christianized Europe? belay Which, however, are insidious ... lol
            Quote: Boris55
            Because you can’t fool the people forever, but oh, it’s like a hunt to parasitize ... True, it will always find a way.

            Whose truth is more truthful and who determined what is real "truth"? recourse
            Quote: Boris55
            Relatives will agree with each other, though not always - the second Nicholas was surrendered in the hope of tearing Russia apart. It didn’t work right away - they are still trying.

            And who beat each other's face in WWI, WWII, and even before, aren't relatives, shepherds?
            Or again ......- Jews? request
            Quote: Boris55
            Currently, with the advent of nuclear weapons, which can destroy them too - anti-human culture is being cultivated, GMO products, drugs, etc. are being introduced ... in general, genocide weapons are being used - alcohol, tobacco, drugs.
            The population for them is just a biological resource, the same as gas or oil. Too large percentage of loaferin leads to revolutions and other troubles.

            Those. destroy the basis of their wealth-herds ?! WHERE did you see the proprietor doing this, destroying the foundation of his wealth? request hi
  7. Gloomy
    Gloomy 12 March 2018 07: 52
    +4
    I love articles from Mr. Alexander "National Bolsa" Samsonov. Whatever the line, it is an aphorism, not a paragraph - platinum.
    I wonder if the venerable gentleman also works as a screenwriter of humorous pseudoscientific programs on RenTV?
  8. Lieutenant Teterin
    Lieutenant Teterin 12 March 2018 08: 28
    +5
    Another nonsense about "superethnos" and "slave civilizations." Curiously, someone will finally be able to explain to Mr. Samsonov that there is no single villainous slave-owning West and that the Bolsheviks of Russian statehood and ethnicity caused enormous damage with their policies of “indigenousization”, the separation of national republics, the destruction of the Russian military, commercial and cultural elite, the defeat of the active part peasants and attempts to create a "new historical community"?
    1. Net
      Net 12 March 2018 15: 11
      0
      Excuse me, but please name “Bolsheviks of Russian ethnicity” by name.
  9. nivander
    nivander 12 March 2018 08: 42
    +3
    the Austrian army immediately became part of the Wehrmacht, and the officers joyfully received the long-awaited promotions and positions. The 1st Vienna Division Hoh und Deutschchester (Gen. Krozik) became the 44th Infantry Division - (died near Stalingrad) -. The 2nd Inn-Innsbruck Division (Gen. de Angelis) became the 45th Infantry Division - (slurped at Brest Moscow, Rzhev died in the Bobruisk Cauldron) ---. The Armored Cavalry Division (Gen. Rous) became the 4th Panzer-- (5 times reduced to the battalion finally died out near Danzig) ---. And the numerous mountain rifle battalions of the company and brigade were transformed into 3 and 4 mountain rifle divisions. Until 1941, Austria gave the Wehrmacht even more than a dozen formations of the division level. Nevertheless, in 1945 the Austrians joyfully and with natural crocodile tears met Soviet and American tanks
    1. BAI
      BAI 12 March 2018 10: 27
      +1
      And the local population actively hunted the fugitives from the block No. 20 of Mauthausen in 1944.
      1. Mikado
        Mikado 12 March 2018 22: 26
        0
        I will support. The 45th division already on June 22 in the Brest Fortress stained itself with war crimes. And during the Hungarian uprising there were throws through Austria of sabotage groups.
  10. BAI
    BAI 12 March 2018 10: 19
    +1
    "Solar" project of the future human civilization

    The author specifically draws an analogy with the "City of the Sun" by the utopian Companella to emphasize the unattainability of the ideals of the "solar" project?
  11. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 12 March 2018 11: 04
    0
    In May 1937, Neville Chamberlain came to power in England. The main course of his foreign policy was to achieve reconciliation with Germany and Italy and create a pact of four.

    Chamberlain’s main foreign policy course was about the same as that of the IVS in the late 30s — delaying the start of the war at all costs in order to allow the British armed forces to recover. After coming to power, this “pacifist and pacifier” increased the military budget, began the rearmament of the Air Force and the army, and strengthened the fleet’s PLO forces (Khanty and Flowers, programs of 1938 and 1939).
    As for Chamberlain's reputation, he owes a lot to his political opponent and the real author of the collapse of the British armed forces. Yes, yes, yes ... it was thanks to Winston Churchill and his concept of "10 years without war" that the army and the Air Force of the Island Empire by the mid-30s were miserable, heartbreaking sight.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Luga
    Luga 12 March 2018 12: 53
    +2
    There are two forces driving the history of mankind. The first is the power of good and progress, the power of light, spontaneously combining in itself all the best that is in humanity. The second - the power of destruction and enslavement, the power of chaos, and where it prevails - only "cry and gnash of teeth." The first personifies Russia, the second - "Masters of the West". Everything that happens on the planet is the result of the struggle of these forces, where the forces of chaos use the most vile and vile methods - betrayal and betrayal, deceit and bribery, intimidation and incitement, and the forces of light oppose them only with their own honor, nobility and their most important force - force the truth.
    And this truth sows among us Samsonov. Despite persecution and vilification, his fiery spirit illuminates our path in the darkness of ignorance, and the trumpet voice gives courage to those who are tired and confident of those who doubt, in order to awaken a great power in us, unfortunate and deceived.
    And now the Russian hero stands up, awakened from a drugged dream, straightens his bent back, shakes off pro-Western parasites, drinks the blood of Russians drinking in buckets, crunching his members with a crunch, tearing off the hostile bonds with which the Masters of the West have braided him, and piercing his enemies with a fiery eye, running in fear and confusion ...
    wassat wassat wassat
    Boring, colleagues, boring ... request
    1. Curious
      Curious 12 March 2018 14: 10
      +2
      I see an analogy with Prometheus. Prometheus is a superethnos, a matrix, light. The West in the form of an eagle subjects Prometheus to all kinds of torment. Prometheus is heroically exposed to these torments. And so for thousands of years. Instead of twisting the eagle-west head and shining yourself calmly.
      But Prometheus knows that if he does, wretched authors like ours will starve to death, and their hamster readers will not be able to exist without the thought of being “exposed” all the time. Well, they can’t be “not exposed” to them. Drawn over the millennia.
      Are you still interested in this bullshit and the contingent that is interested in it.
      And Teterin, I see, spends power on throwing beads. Give up.
      1. Luga
        Luga 12 March 2018 14: 19
        +3
        Quote: Curious
        Are you still interested in this bullshit and the contingent that is interested in it.
        And Teterin, I see, spends power on throwing beads. Give up.

        I won’t answer for Teterin, but personally I am having fun. I believe that if such an opus is left without my comment, then Samsonov wrote it in vain. smile
        And in general, today pulls flood, apparently, spring ...
      2. Mikado
        Mikado 12 March 2018 14: 24
        +2
        Viktor Nikolaevich, I admit, I agree in something with Samsonov that the West lived and lives largely at the expense of other countries (in this paragraph). The main thing is to deliver a good commodity and financial turnover. In any case, the western countries remained rich, and the inhabitants of their former colonies both jumped on palm trees and jump, only with a Kalashnikov assault rifle in their hands. The question is that the West really set clear goals, and received its profit, and the USSR spent (gave away) a lot of money to support various "friendly regimes". Where are they, these modes .... and "where is the money, Zin" ..hi Of course, I said one-sidedly, everything is much more complicated, but in part I'm right. hi You know better, you just traveled abroad and traveled with a mission of assistance and exchange of experience. yes If I'm wrong, correct me. soldier Just don’t tackle with intelligence! fellow drinks
        1. Curious
          Curious 12 March 2018 14: 37
          +1
          If you have a desire to live well, but there are not enough resources for this, then you will either be satisfied with cash and will "live within our means", or will take what is missing from our neighbors. “Subject” them to robbery and violence. Or cheat. Not the point.
          Now the question. And if you have all the resources to live well and rob no one?
          1. Mikado
            Mikado 12 March 2018 14: 48
            +1
            Now the question. And if you have all the resources to live well and rob no one?

            I personally would be satisfied with this, and would not go to other countries "to look for my Borodino." But .. Greed is such a thing. Sometimes it can be everything, but I want more and more. request it is these people who become oligarchs. Or Napoleons.

            You can make out the cartoon for quotes. good And that's it! drinks
            1. Curious
              Curious 12 March 2018 14: 56
              +2
              I had a slightly different meaning. But alright, let's go in that direction. This paragraph - "Sometimes it can be everything, but I want more and more" - it is inherently international, or inherent only to representatives of the "rotten Western civilization", the rest are modest people who are ready to swallow a cracker, but keep their "high moral and civilizational principles "?
              1. Mikado
                Mikado 12 March 2018 15: 06
                +2
                whoo! good otherwise I could not understand your thought, too deep for my tormented by two higher psyche. wink drinks definitely on to gnaw a cracker, but to maintain their "high moral and civilizational principles"? only rabid Tolstoyans or finished yogis are ready. hi each country has its own goals. But we were outplayed.
                By the way, we get a good Socratic dialogue wink
                1. Curious
                  Curious 12 March 2018 15: 24
                  +2
                  I’ll probably draw a line on this, given the experience of previous "Socratic dialogues." As the saying goes, "in much wisdom there is much sadness; and whoever multiplies knowledge, multiplies sorrow."
                  1. Mikado
                    Mikado 12 March 2018 15: 25
                    +2
                    As the saying goes, "in much wisdom there is much sadness; and whoever multiplies knowledge, multiplies sorrow."

                    Are you afraid to crush my self-esteem? wink It's empty! hi I’m already used .... from the moment I contacted you, I’m used to it! laughing love
  14. Yak28
    Yak28 12 March 2018 17: 57
    +1
    With the tacit consent of the leading Western countries of England and France, Hitler began the production of military equipment and as a result created a powerful and modern army. Probably England and France hoped that the German army would destroy the USSR in the first place. However, everything went a little way, as the history of the well-armed showed, numerous European armies turned out to be cowardly and inexperienced, and as a result they were not combat-ready, becoming easy prey for the Hitler army.
  15. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 12 March 2018 22: 34
    +1
    As a result, all powers turned out to be cannon fodder, with the exception of one that received a gesheft. The Americans left in the fools even the grandmasters of geopolitics, the British, and bravo.
  16. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 13 March 2018 14: 07
    +1
    masters of the West

    I propose to call the author of the articles exactly that way - the demonizer