Mogherini called the conditions under which the EU will support the entry of peacekeepers in the Donbass

63
The European Union will support the deployment of UN peacekeeping forces in the Donbass if it helps in the implementation of the Minsk agreements and the settlement of the conflict, said the head of European diplomacy Federica Mogherini.





The Minsk agreements have not yet been fully implemented, and we still believe that they should be. This is the purpose of the negotiations in the framework of the Tripartite Contact Group and the discussion in the "Norman format". The Minsk agreements, indeed, as it was absolutely necessary, managed to stop the dangerous escalation of violence,
Mogherini said in an interview UNIAN.

According to her, Brussels is working "to create conditions that guarantee the achievement of a complete cease-fire and accelerated progress by all parties (the conflict) in the framework of fulfilling their obligations."

We consistently voice this through our contacts with both the Ukrainian authorities and Russia. That is why our sanctions are important. They can increase political and economic pressure, prevent further escalation and ultimately contribute to changing the behavior of Russia and its approach to the Minsk process,
noted the head of diplomacy.

She recalled that the decision on the introduction of peacekeeping forces is taken by the UN, not the European Union.

We would like the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in Ukraine to have full access to the entire territory of Ukraine, including along the Russian-Ukrainian border, in accordance with its mandate. And if the peacekeeping mission, agreed by the UN Security Council, could accelerate all this and help advance the implementation of the Minsk agreements, we would, of course, be only in favor
reported Mogherini.

Recall, Kiev is seeking the introduction of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass, which would have a broad mandate and located throughout the territory of Donbass to the Russian border. Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that he supported the idea of ​​sending peacekeepers to the east of Ukraine, but this could only be a safety function of the OSCE staff along the line of contact.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +30
    11 March 2018 16: 44
    Ask LDNR first .. And then decide .. You have found the captures. Cover your rear .. And then they will introduce you. Bearded. And there will be no second reconquest ..
    1. +21
      11 March 2018 16: 48
      “It is clear that the Minsk agreements were signed between LDNR and Ukraine, while we pro-American eurozombies, incurring economic losses, continue to say that Russia, for some reason, must fulfill what it did not sign, but others have signed, otherwise the overseas master of us, eurodeities, will punish "- thought Mogherin wassat
      1. +9
        11 March 2018 16: 49
        Geyropeytsy want a lot. At the expense of others. Plus bias. The LDNR and the Russian Federation are always to blame for everything and always. A banderlog with a pig is always white and fluffy.
        1. +15
          11 March 2018 16: 51
          The European Union has nothing to do with UN peacekeeping missions.
          1. +25
            11 March 2018 17: 03
            Quote: Thrall
            ... The European Union has nothing to do with UN peacekeeping missions ...

            The European Union is not related to the Minsk agreements. There was no Mogherini.
            If my memory serves me, there were representatives of Germany, France and Russia. These are guarantor countries. Something is not heard about the sanctions against France and Germany, they also signed for the country 404. And they were sent by artillery to cities and villages. Something in Mogherini's eyesight ...
            1. +7
              11 March 2018 17: 08
              Vladimir Putin said that he supported the idea of ​​sending peacekeepers to the east of Ukraine

              After sending the Russian airborne troops to Kiev! Yes
            2. +4
              11 March 2018 18: 17
              Quote: Andrey K
              The European Union is not related to the Minsk agreements. There Mogherini and there was no smell ..

              European Union from Russian countersanctions are losing more than Russia from their sanctions. According to them. Trump also just recently introduced import duties from Europe to the States. And in these conditions, the European official decided to put pressure on us ??
              That is why our sanctions are important. They can increase political and economic pressure, prevent further escalation and ultimately contribute to a change in Russia's behavior
              Absolutely crazy ...
              1. +2
                11 March 2018 19: 51
                crazy ... from birth, you can't make a smart career there - you will lose your mind on everything ... and then go!
          2. +4
            11 March 2018 22: 38
            Quote: Thrall
            The European Union has nothing to do with UN peacekeeping missions.

            Especially after Europe "screwed up" during the peacekeeping mission in Serbia: under Amer’s control, NATO set a record and decided to introduce NATO forces in Serbia in a day, throwing Europe out of there
        2. +9
          11 March 2018 18: 50
          And if the peacekeeping mission agreed by the UN Security Council could accelerate all this and help advance the implementation of the Minsk accords, we would, of course, only be in favor,

          And whoever asks this euro horse because of the puddle, they decide there, but Russia is resisting.
        3. +1
          11 March 2018 20: 06
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Geyropeytsy want a lot. At the expense of others. Plus bias. The LDNR and the Russian Federation are always to blame for everything and always. A banderlog with a pig is always white and fluffy.

          I recall the shock of the Nazi generals when the French arrived to sign the surrender ... "What, they defeated us too !?"
    2. +11
      11 March 2018 16: 49
      Quote: 210ox
      Ask LDNR first

      Consent of the People's Republics is the first and most important condition. And what Mogherini thinks is not interesting to anyone at all
    3. +4
      11 March 2018 16: 58
      And she asked Zakharchenko what conditions would he put for her? winked Euro peacekeepers are just cover for starting a military aggression. Let it be better to peace at home. winked
      1. +3
        11 March 2018 17: 06
        Set the conditions for the sharpie!? In the best case, give a kick before the negotiations.
        Quote: siberalt
        And she asked Zakharchenko what conditions would he put for her? winked Euro peacekeepers are just cover for starting a military aggression. Let it be better to peace at home. winked
      2. +2
        11 March 2018 18: 33
        herring marshal Zakharchenko had already conquered Kiev several times, Europe and London. yes, and in general, as Madame Mogherini can stand next to a man who has 7 USSR heroes and two chicken stalls in the family ??? at best, she can only ask permission to floor bets to get a stall.
      3. +2
        11 March 2018 19: 35
        Quote: siberalt
        And she asked Zakharchenko what conditions would he put for her?

        Does Zakharchenko decide something?
    4. +3
      11 March 2018 17: 12
      They do not ask LDNR. Papa Trump decides for 'united Europeans'.
    5. +6
      11 March 2018 17: 17
      Stultus ordinaria (dur.a vulgaris - lat.) - somewhere, approximately, like that! laughing
    6. +3
      11 March 2018 17: 21
      The decisive word about the introduction of UN peacekeepers beyond Novorossia and Russia, there will be no Canadian-Bandera goblins there. Consent will be given for deployment along the administrative line of Donbass with the mandatory presence of Russian troops from the UN.
      1. 0
        11 March 2018 18: 00
        Quote: Thrall
        The European Union has nothing to do with UN peacekeeping missions.

        Nevertheless, it has experience in conducting such operations (21 operations), the largest in Bosnia (in accordance with UN Security Council resolution No. 1576) .http: //militaryarticle.ru/zarubezhnoe-voenn
        oe-obozrenie / 2008-zvo / 7623-operacii-i-missii-evro
        pejskogo-sojuza
        1. +6
          11 March 2018 18: 38
          Sora gathers in kodla or vice versa, kodla in svoru.
      2. +3
        11 March 2018 22: 48
        Euro-mattresses only create a background. Solves the Washington Regional Committee. They would have long been their "peacekeepers" without any UN sanctions, but they fear a repetition of South Ossetia and Crimea. The third time in a row to sit in their own manure, oh oh how not hunting. And the likelihood of this is much higher than in those situations.
    7. 0
      12 March 2018 10: 19
      Aunt is clearly not in herself. Russia has already stated that sanctions are a problem for those who introduced them. Russia will not agree to any conditions. Everyone in the West can’t understand this.
    8. wvg
      0
      12 March 2018 10: 26
      And here LDNR? It is Russia that must be forced to amend the constitution of Ukraine, introduce an amnesty in Ukraine and also fulfill the rest of the clauses of the agreement, even if for this it is necessary to change the regime of power in Ukraine!
      It seems that this is within the forces of one Airborne Division, and after the implementation of Minsk-2 let them figure out how to live on and whether it is worth living at all.
  2. +2
    11 March 2018 16: 45
    another supporter of the "Croatian scenario ..."
    1. +5
      11 March 2018 16: 51
      laughing
      Quote: taiga2018
      another supporter of the "Croatian scenario ..."

      Mogherini - Mussolini's girlfriend
  3. +7
    11 March 2018 16: 50
    Damn it, how terrible it is. And made up and not made up. She would go on ... a forest with her EU. It was necessary to discuss the fate of the “east of Ukraine” and the introduction of some peacekeepers earlier, in 2013, when all this was conceived in Washington and Brussels. And now the train has gone east.
    1. +3
      11 March 2018 19: 10
      Quote: gerkost2012
      Damn it, how terrible it is.

      when this seigneur loomed on the EU foreign policy horizon, an article appeared in the VO with some hopes that the new head of European diplomacy was not at all Russophobic, but even vice versa. Somewhere dug her kind words about the Russian Federation and so on. As usual, as always without understanding, the fooling public declared Mogherini, almost Putin’s protege. So, many considered her appearance pretty, and some even beautiful. wink
  4. +3
    11 March 2018 16: 51
    Minsk has not been respected for a long time and the VNA has been ignored, and these tolerant democrats still will not quit fool
    It would be necessary to give the GDP yet another interview with Megin Kelly (she sees in dreams oh how she wants these meetings lol ) and walk around Europe with a righteous skating rink - then Mogherini will find out the true opinion about its conditions and offers wassat
    1. +5
      11 March 2018 19: 23
      Quote: Rurikovich
      One more interview should be given to GDP

      So he gave in another place. And not against peacekeepers throughout the territory of the LPR.
      At a press conference following talks with Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurtz, President Vladimir Putin spoke about how the idea had developed to deploy peacekeeping contingents in eastern Ukraine, RBC reports.

      According to him, Ukraine first raised the issue of arming the OSCE monitoring mission, which operates in the conflict zone. “We agreed, the OSCE refused, citing the fact that the OSCE has neither such experience, nor people,” the president explained. Fears, he said, were also caused by the fact that armed mission personnel could become targets for both sides of the conflict.

      After that, the idea was expressed of a UN mission that would ensure the security of the OSCE SMM. “We agreed,” Putin said. Then in a telephone conversation, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that peacekeepers should also be deployed on the border between Russia and Ukraine. “I said: you are probably right,” the president added.

      “We went for it. But this was not enough. Now they say that they should be everywhere, that is, in fact put the entire territory [of the conflict in the Donbass] under international control. Is Russia for or against? At least we are not opposed, but we need to negotiate with these unrecognized republics, then go and agree with them. No, nobody is going to do this, ”Putin said.
      1. +5
        11 March 2018 21: 14
        Quote: Karabin
        At least we are not opposed, but we need to negotiate with these unrecognized republics, then go and agree with them. No, nobody is going to do this, "

        Here is the answer hi LDNR will not negotiate with dill, nor dill will negotiate with LDNR. Many have agreed on this from Minsk. hi
  5. +7
    11 March 2018 16: 52
    Everyone wants to go down in history and get involved. European dances on the blood.
  6. +4
    11 March 2018 16: 56
    Feminism is a terrible vesch ...
  7. +7
    11 March 2018 16: 58
    It’s painful for me to watch, it’s painful what kind of Russian spaces solve some kind of Morgelini and some kind of Americans ... who gave them the right to decide ?!
  8. +3
    11 March 2018 16: 59
    EU climb into every hole. They made a coup with the Americans - now they dictate how to live in the southeast. It is clear that they want to block the southeast tightly, and to establish a fascist regime on that territory. . That all obey America, like the rest of Ukraine. Trust them - if they all live in Europe only on lies.
  9. +4
    11 March 2018 16: 59
    Never. This word is never ... Never any peacekeepers will be introduced to the Donbass. Generally. Since Russia has the right to veto! And now it has become a little more WEIGHT ...
    1. +2
      11 March 2018 18: 23
      During the war of North and South Korea, the USSR also had a veto right. How did this help North Korea ?? but the veto right when deciding to create a global tribunal on the shooting down of the Boeing Mn17 really helped. It is not clear why to use it if there is irrefutable evidence of our warriors and ck about Ukraine’s involvement in this?
      1. +2
        11 March 2018 22: 28
        The USSR then generally boycotted (and did the right thing) meetings of this remarkable pro-American organization with an office in New York, because then instead of China little Taiwan was represented there. The American intervention in Korea would still have taken place under a different flag, at least under the Olympic one, and the Americans would have gotten too tough there. The UN flag only compromised them, and their office. China and the USSR limitedly intervened in this conflict only when these mummers of the "UN" began to threaten their borders.
        No one answered the questions of the Russian military on Boeing. And then they gathered to set up some tribunal and moggerinit there, following the example of the Yugoslav! According to the terms of the resolution about him, any of Russia should have been given to the Hague, which they would point their finger at according to the “materials” from social networks. And he did not concern Boeing, but the entire "Ukrainian-Russian" conflict, with all the consequences. For some reason, this business with Boeing is not conducted by international Interpol but by the Dutch prosecutor’s office, which puts everything under its control and does not consider it, and decides what it likes.
    2. +5
      11 March 2018 19: 33
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      No peacekeepers will ever be introduced to the Donbass.

      I would not be so categorical. Three years ago, the very idea of ​​consenting to the introduction of the MS in Donbass was almost unanimously considered an act of betrayal, and now we are discussing options. Walker and Surkov discuss the same conditions. Putin said that Russia, in principle, is not opposed. There is bargaining, and the option that the Russian president will not complain about four years later that the Russian Federation is again “brazenly and meanly deceived”, this time with peacekeepers, is quite real.
      1. 0
        11 March 2018 22: 37
        Now they will bring you their peacekeepers to the Germans-bridge. After the previous special envoy of Russia to the UN openly etched.
    3. wvg
      0
      12 March 2018 10: 34
      the best word is ALWAYS!
      Peacekeepers in the Donbass needed! And above all, in that part of Donbass that is occupied by Ukraine.
  10. +2
    11 March 2018 17: 00
    Brussels is working "to create conditions guaranteeing the achievement of a complete ceasefire and accelerated progress by all parties (conflict) in the framework of fulfilling their obligations."
    I wonder what “Makar” Germany and France achieve the achievement of a complete ceasefire, if fully and completely subject to the states? They carry nonsense and thereby hide behind. In fact, they have long since “disowned” all agreements!
    1. Net
      +4
      11 March 2018 17: 28
      Brussels has already guaranteed the absence of a coup in 2014. 4 EuroMinisters signed. Maybe at first they will fulfill these guarantees?
  11. +1
    11 March 2018 17: 01
    Why should we justify ourselves and repeat the same thing. They said that.
    "And if it doesn’t, turn off the gas!"
  12. 0
    11 March 2018 17: 01
    all the same, I hope that the Russian leadership will never agree to peacekeepers along its border with the republics, an agreement would mean that we recognize the fact of the war between Russia and Ukraine ...
  13. +6
    11 March 2018 17: 20
    That is why our sanctions are important. They can increase political and economic pressure, prevent further escalation and ultimately contribute to a change in Russia's behavior

    Yes try your luck ...
  14. Net
    +1
    11 March 2018 17: 25
    Mogherini would have said under what conditions the EU will support the withdrawal of American occupation forces from Europe. That would be much more important for Europe.
  15. +5
    11 March 2018 18: 09
    They will not perform Minsk in Ukraine. Then the whole top of the government will fly off and there will be such chaos that the Maidan will appear as a children's sandbox.
  16. 0
    11 March 2018 18: 10
    In short - Signora lowered kaklov below the plinth ...
  17. 0
    11 March 2018 18: 15
    Let him take a pair of blue helmets .... for safety. Now the time has come! ... About the blue sky can not be said without subtext .... sad
  18. +1
    11 March 2018 18: 35
    Our Middle Eastern partners are such dreamers.
  19. +3
    11 March 2018 18: 48
    Minsk suburbs are not respected, and will not be respected ... but the Muggerini and others like her do not want to see this
    Quote: Masya Masya
    That is why our sanctions are important. They can increase political and economic pressure, prevent further escalation and ultimately contribute to a change in Russia's behavior

    why not push the kuev? instead, they allocated a lard .... to continue the war?
  20. +1
    11 March 2018 18: 56
    Again, cheeks are pouting, as if their opinion means anything. They don’t give a damn about the inhabitants of Donbass from a high bell tower. The main thing is to spoil Russia with something.
  21. 0
    11 March 2018 19: 07
    CLIMAX BRAIN fool
  22. +1
    11 March 2018 19: 54
    What only the EU has not supported and supported! But the Minsk agreements cannot be read at least! SHAME!
  23. +1
    11 March 2018 19: 55
    They all set some conditions and put forward ultimatums! Ass @ fucked up!
  24. +1
    11 March 2018 20: 51
    “Minsk agreements have not yet been fully implemented
    ----------------------
    They, in my opinion, have not been implemented at all by any point .....................
  25. +1
    11 March 2018 23: 40
    Do these babes still think that Javropa is deciding something? it’s already ridiculous to listen to their attempts, as Russia-USA will say so, and to sit and assent to the sixes
  26. 0
    11 March 2018 23: 55
    Well, yes, they want the ukrovermaht to creep
    the occupation under the guise of these peacekeepers.
    And then these same peacekeepers will defend ukrovermaht if something happens.
    Well, at the expense of sanctions ... well, they are stupid.
  27. 0
    11 March 2018 23: 59
    Interestingly, has she ever combed her head?
  28. 0
    12 March 2018 04: 25
    "That's why our sanctions are important. They can increase political and economic pressure, prevent further escalation and ultimately contribute to a change in Russia's behavior and its approach to the Minsk process," is it not clear from which side the dill ??? Trying to show puff up to show its independence, and fear without sneezing.
  29. 0
    12 March 2018 08: 11
    It’s necessary to chat with them! We have a large border with Ukraine. Belgorod, Kursk, Oryol regions - let them sit and monitor even before losing a pulse. And between Lugansk, Donetsk and Russia, in fact, there is no border, there is nothing to monitor.
  30. 0
    12 March 2018 12: 52
    The main thing in all this verbiage .. control over the border of Russia and LDN .. that is hardly real. And for sure this control will not be in any case. Not the UN, or even some “peacekeepers," and even less so Ukraine will not get control. What was Valtsman thinking when signing the Minsk agreements? Border control is the last and hardly feasible point. The border is a guarantee of the independence of the Lao PDR and they won’t give it back .. like Russia, even if ALL points of the agreements are fulfilled, and Ukraine understands this.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"