Military Review

New weapons of Russia as a guarantee of changes in the world political system

143
Well, the hype about the speech of V.V. Putin's introduction of new types of weapons is gradually ending. The press "revealed all Russian military secrets", "the entire bluff of the Kremlin", "Putin’s struggle for the presidency for the next term." As much attention as was paid to this speech, not one of the speeches of modern politicians in the past few years caused, perhaps.




Talk about the performance of those weapons, which told Putin, I will not. Not because it is necessary to keep military and state secrets. Just really, the work was done in such secrecy that few know the reality. Even from the top leadership of the country. At least that was how it was possible to perceive their reaction to the words of Vladimir Vladimirovich.

So, Russia has ceased to catch up. But this is exactly what the USSR was doing. It was about this situation that quite recently almost everyone spoke. "In response to ... US, we will deploy our ...". Instead of a dot, you can insert any next weapon or initiative of the US or NATO in the military field.

Catching up is always harder than running away. Just because you are limited in maneuvering the actions of the evader. So, you spend much more manpower and resources to keep up with it completely. Although we cannot talk about the already forgotten arms race as uselessly spent forces and finances.

It was then that Russia received the shield that today reliably covers the country from the attack of the aggressor. It was then that many existing defensive systems were developed. It is on these systems that the development of Western design ideas today is oriented. Today we are reaping the fruits of the lost, in the opinion of some, the arms race.

I already wrote that in conditions when we are forced to “catch up” with the probable enemy, our not completely stable economy will inevitably lose to the West. We will be forced to spend more than we can and still lag behind. We are not ready to confront the consolidated West. And besides the shield, we also received a sword.

For the first time, Russia has become a runner-up from evading. Those systems that are named by the president are not so much for defense, but for retaliation. And if we discard the "peace-loving rhetoric", then for the attack. Now we can also "misinterpret" something.

I think among the readers there are those who have not forgotten the speech of US presidential candidate Hilary Clinton. Remember her warning in plain text? If Russia subjects the US to cyber attacks, then this should be perceived as a direct military invasion. And in these conditions, the United States has the right to attack Russia with all the means at its disposal.

At the same time, it never occurred to anyone that the "war in cyberspace" is virtual. And the evidence there can be cooked up a lot. Any evidence. And after the attack by military means and the destruction of the country who will understand? Winners are not judged. There are many examples of such actions even in recent decades. Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Ukraine, if you like.

Let's look at what Putin said through the eyes of an ordinary soldier or officer. No matter which army of the world. We will see from the point of view of the possibility of opposing this weapon today.

Intercontinental ballistic missile RS-28 "Sarmat". With external similarities with its predecessors, this is a completely new type of rocket. Sophisticated systems of deception of the enemy's missile defense system, a huge range of flight, allowing you to attack from any direction, a large throw-in weight, allowing you to carry not only real warheads, but also false ones. And at the same time, a faster start, a higher flight speed and the ability to change course during the flight.

And now the conclusion of Western experts about the possibility of intercepting this rocket. For guaranteed interception "Sarmat" you need at least ... 500 antimissiles. The figure may be overstated in order to get new allocations for scientific research, but I do not think that much. And if you add to the "Sarmatian" already known glider U-71? Will the American missile defense cope with such a missile? It is doubtful.

Complex "Dagger". Many people remember sea-based missiles "Zircon". This is the brother of this aircraft carrier killer. Only at times great opportunities. Air basing practically makes the complex "omnivorous." The highest speed (12 000 km per hour), long range (2 000 km), the ability to maneuver makes the Dagger not just the AUG assassin, and without harm to the wearer (MiG-31 fighter), but also the assassin of objects far to the rear of the potential enemy.

But there is still a rocket "Avant-garde" with 20-multiple sound speed and the ability to change course. There is a nuclear-powered rocket, with virtually no range limitations. There is an unmanned nuclear submarine "Status-6" with a depth of immersion beyond 1000 meters and a speed that while nothing on the water moves. It is about this boat that is spoken of as a possible carrier of a hydrogen bomb capable of causing tsunamis in coastal areas.

Now a little about the "obvious-unbelievable." That everyone knows. About what "almost nobody knows". Think, can you name the Soviet or Russian weapons that would be exported abroad without the existence of much better weapons in our army?

And now from the recent past. Russia has concluded contracts for the supply of C-400 systems with some countries. In particular with Turkey. Similarly, with some other types of weapons. On the other hand, for some reason, we are not interested in exporting "Armatu" ...

It was the C-400 supplies that pushed Western experts to the idea of ​​the possibility of exporting the systems Putin was talking about. On the sidelines of NATO and the Pentagon are actively discussing this very thought. The thing is that the sale weapons really redraw all foreign policy in the world. The example of the DPRK showed everyone that with the presence of even a minimum of serious weapons, the "strong countries" start enuresis from fear for their own lives.

In the near future, we should expect speeches by American and NATO generals, in which this very thought will be voiced. Understanding that Russia will not do this in the near future is in the military circles of the West. But such a "scarecrow" for their own people and the government not to use would be a great folly. Money money money...

Today it should be recognized that the multibillion-dollar costs of the United States in the fight against products of the arms race that has sunk into oblivion, have been reduced to a minimum by Russia. All these AUG, European missile defense and other "gadgets" of Americans are almost crossed out by us. In the event of a real conflict, we will be able to face the American army on an equal footing. At least on equal terms.

The USA “yesterday” needs to install its own anti-missile shield on the continent. I will repeat the idea that has already been voiced repeatedly, the ocean has turned from an ally of the United States into an enemy. More precisely the oceans. Again, after the speech of Putin and a beautiful cartoon on the screen.

But, in my opinion, a completely different scenario is more likely. We do not need to sell anything. Until the moment when there will be systems that can withstand ours. It is enough just to have them. That's enough.

No matter how much our “European partners” can boast of their freedom and independence, most of them tend to have one, not very pleasant, but existing, quality. They readily move from one camp to another, betray their master allies, exactly at that moment when they realize that the enemy is stronger.

Exactly when the Europeans understand, as the Turks understood, for example, that all the talk about American invincibility is just talk, the mass "enlightenment" of European governments will begin. The first, those who come running to Moscow "at the head of the peloton", will get enough preferences. The rest will get miserable "leftovers". Oh, and the stampede will begin in the queue for admission to the Kremlin offices.

Thus, this year we should expect not only the easing of sanctions against Russia, but also the appearance of the first "defectors" in Europe. So, the change in the entire system of relations between countries. The US will be forced to reckon not only with the opinion of Russia, but also with the opinion of those countries that will go under its protection. Again there will be a rebirth of two at least opposing blocs.

The only thing that is not yet very clear is whether China agrees with the role of "head of the region" or enters into an alliance with one of the parties as a "junior partner" ... And the answer to the question I asked the readers a little higher is simple. By 2020, around Moscow, the X-NUMX battery of the C-4 “Prometheus” SAM system should be installed ...
Author:
143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Firework
    Firework 10 March 2018 06: 23
    +25
    what would be considered important to Russia and weapons and the power of the economy, with the second, not everything is simple
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 10 March 2018 06: 48
      +13
      Now we, too, can something "not understand".

      Gold words. And the fact that the economy is "not everything is simple," so when it was different
      1. midivan
        midivan 10 March 2018 07: 40
        +13
        Quote: Chertt
        And the fact that the economy is "not everything is simple," so when it was different

        Eeee, my friend, why are you the most important mantra fellow they took it like that and plunged it into a tar bucket laughing
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 10 March 2018 08: 27
          +10
          Quote: midivan
          ... why are you the most important mantra ...

          For nefig (s)
          1. GDP
            GDP 13 March 2018 10: 21
            0
            To say that the military potentials of the USA and Russia are at least equal ... It seems to me that this is hatred. Even if we do not take into account the combined power of NATO, the United States even surpasses us quantitatively in most types of weapons, it can be only with the exception of artillery, in tanks and air defense, parity in the number of nuclear charges and delivery vehicles is slightly superior to the states, in sea and air the absolute dominance of the Yankees is quantitative their aviation and navy surpasses us several times. Gitersonic missiles, Armata and PAK FA This is certainly good, but when will they still enter the army and saturate the army properly? So far, in the event of war, we can only defend ourselves at our borders or charge along the impudent muzzle.
      2. 210ox
        210ox 10 March 2018 07: 55
        +22
        When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in different years it’s different. But economies are simply incomparable. And the bugbear of the “new weapon” is temporary. And its guarantor raised because there is nothing else.
        Quote: Chertt
        Now we, too, can something "not understand".

        Gold words. And the fact that the economy is "not everything is simple," so when it was different
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 10 March 2018 07: 59
          +7
          Quote: 210ox
          When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in all years in different ways.

          I will not say about all the times of the USSR. But the end of the 80s was with very very big problems
          1. krops777
            krops777 10 March 2018 15: 06
            +4
            But the end of the 80s was with very very big problems


            Problems were but not fatal, moreover, arranged artificially. Instead of reforms, Gorbi sold the country.
        2. Boris55
          Boris55 10 March 2018 08: 38
          +22
          Quote: 210ox
          And the bug of the “new weapon” is temporary. And his guarantor raised because there is nothing else.

          There is nothing more permanent than something temporary. Not gonna get us!
          The guarantor raised this issue for a very simple reason - the United States announced the use of nuclear weapons for any reason. Russia simply could not answer this call - to cool hotheads there. All the preparations conducted by the United States to stupefy public opinion about the unpunished use of nuclear weapons against a terrible Russia have failed. This is the main result of the second part of the President’s speech.
          The war that the hawks in Washington so dreamed of was put off by us indefinitely.
          1. flicker
            flicker 10 March 2018 09: 59
            +3
            Not gonna get us!
            Here, the same opinion. Maybe China, but not the USA.
          2. dauria
            dauria 10 March 2018 20: 05
            +3
            The war that the hawks in Washington so dreamed of was put off by us indefinitely.


            Pros wanted to exchange 120 million people on each side? And look at the wreckage of the United States and Russia, how does China immediately become the only superpower? They are not idiots or suicides. You confuse American strategists with reporters.
        3. New Year day
          New Year day 10 March 2018 09: 39
          +2
          Quote: 210ox
          But economies are simply not comparable. And the bogeyman of the “new weapon” is temporary.

          and the world political system will change again, there is nothing settled
        4. Barabashka 68
          Barabashka 68 10 March 2018 11: 38
          +12
          "When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in different years it’s different. But economies are simply incomparable. And the bogeyman of a" new weapon "is temporary. And his guarantor raised it because there is nothing else." - when you finally understand that our country is not Sweden and not even Germany together with France. Size, climate, wars not unleashed by us, revolutions from the outside. Today, sanctions are strangling energy. Yes, and whiners here and throughout the country letting snot. Do not like it - do it better.
          1. 210ox
            210ox 10 March 2018 14: 52
            +5
            In my family, I’m doing what would be better. Four sons, built a house ... And for the country ... But who will give it when candid freaks are appointed as presidential candidates ..
            Quote: Barabashka 68
            "When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in different years it’s different. But economies are simply incomparable. And the bogeyman of a" new weapon "is temporary. And his guarantor raised it because there is nothing else." - when you finally understand that our country is not Sweden and not even Germany together with France. Size, climate, wars not unleashed by us, revolutions from the outside. Today, sanctions are strangling energy. Yes, and whiners here and throughout the country letting snot. Do not like it - do it better.
        5. businessv
          businessv 10 March 2018 12: 13
          +6
          Quote: 210ox
          And the bogeyman of the “new weapon” is temporary. And his guarantor raised it because there is nothing else.

          And you, apparently, still have a lot of things in store in favor of mattress-like ones! Come on, my friend, spread it out, otherwise somehow everything in the article is really very optimistic, not in your way all-pervasive! hi
          1. 210ox
            210ox 10 March 2018 16: 35
            +7
            I hate mattress-like ones, but that empty talking-room about the country's development is unacceptable. For me, by the way, the same authority is Stalin, and from foreign leaders Den Xiaoping, even the same Pinochet, whom many hated by many, did much more for Chile than many politicians there.
            Quote: businessv
            Quote: 210ox
            And the bogeyman of the “new weapon” is temporary. And his guarantor raised it because there is nothing else.

            And you, apparently, still have a lot of things in store in favor of mattress-like ones! Come on, my friend, spread it out, otherwise somehow everything in the article is really very optimistic, not in your way all-pervasive! hi
        6. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 10 March 2018 21: 24
          +4
          Quote: 210ox
          When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in different years it’s different. But economies are simply incomparable. And the bugbear of the “new weapon” is temporary. And its guarantor raised because there is nothing else.

          If you didn’t raise the guarantor “new weapon”, then soon the last one would be taken from us. And so, when it was shown to the cunning faces that they would be beaten, Russia at least had 10-15 years to calmly deal with the economy.
      3. geniy
        geniy 11 March 2018 17: 53
        +3
        Just do not scare all Russian difficulties in the economy. In fact, practically all other countries have difficulties, even very rich ones, for example, the USA has difficulties, and England, France, Japan, and even Germany. And if most Western fans believe that the above countries are many times richer than Russia, then this is a general misconception. The fact is that in these countries a fictitious calculation of the gross domestic product is used. And so the whole comparison of their financial power is fictitious. And besides, we must remember that we must remember that all of the countries listed have a huge financial debt that they can never repay - and all these countries will sooner or later face a financial collapse - default. And if the US national debt is approximately equal to GDP, then for the other countries I have listed it is even greater - and two, and three times more than GDP. So there is no need to tell tales here that Russia is all so poor, and the countries opposing us - oh, how rich. In fact, all of their ostentatious wealth is only that they LIVE IN DEBT!
    2. fa2998
      fa2998 10 March 2018 08: 10
      +1
      This is the essence of the economy. You need to have 2% of military expenses and have a modern army, but not 20-30%, and God forbid all 50-80% of the budget. I think when the economy shrinks and the process of increasing costs goes, we go the second way hi
    3. Boris55
      Boris55 10 March 2018 08: 26
      +17
      Quote: Salute
      what would be considered important to Russia and weapons and the power of the economy, with the second, not everything is simple

      Speak to the second not really? And talks about the negotiations are already underway. It seems that you are wrong in this. It’s enough to have the strength to start respecting and talking to you as an equal.
      Regarding the fact that our economy is not very good, Putin put two-thirds of his report on this. True, “ours,” and not ours, the media just don’t notice this, including VO correspondents, which is very upsetting ...
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 10 March 2018 10: 12
      +9
      10 days left to vigorously admire our new weapons, "which will shock the world. Already 10 days in all the Russian media about the same thing. Or is it hard for our readers, or is it already a trend for making money on advertising? belay
      1. Lex.
        Lex. 10 March 2018 10: 38
        +6
        To shake the world, you first need to rivet them in acceptable quantities, how many of those very calibres of them must be thousands of standing in the United States
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 10 March 2018 10: 42
          +12
          Quote: Lex.
          of those very calibers, thousands of them should stand in the United States

          Are you sure that we have fewer of them? We just had no reason, unlike the United States, to demonstrate them, so it seemed to you that we had them only yesterday.
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 10 March 2018 11: 10
            +10
            Quote: Boris55
            Are you sure that we have fewer of them?

            And you are sure that it’s more, naivety. Well, name the sites from which they can be launched in a volley! What sites are not called (in view of their absence?) That's just the same
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 10 March 2018 11: 16
              +5
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Well, name the platforms from which they can be launched in one gulp!

              I'd rather show:


              1. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt 10 March 2018 11: 38
                +10
                Well, how many in a volley, the indicator, is much larger than in the total volley of NATO or much less. You don’t give numbers, because we are lagging behind the complexes of the Kyrgyz Republic, and it remains for you to print beautiful pictures to blur this fact.
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 10 March 2018 11: 46
                  +10
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Well, and how much in the salvo, the indicator is much larger than in the combined volley of NATO

                  So tell everything straight to you - do not wait until you poke around, but poke around, be sure, rake in full. This time you can’t sit out in a puddle. hi
                2. CHARM
                  CHARM 11 March 2018 14: 25
                  +3
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Well, how many in a volley, the indicator, is much larger than in the total volley of NATO or much less. You don’t give numbers, because we are lagging behind the complexes of the Kyrgyz Republic, and it remains for you to print beautiful pictures to blur this fact.

                  Well, we have all sorts of CR and RCC capable of working on the ground, too. Second, Putin clearly said in Russian, -in case of military aggression in our direction or in the direction of our allies, we reserve the right to use any weapon, including nuclear, in response. In other words, any missile strike at us, at our bases, etc., will be regarded as an act of declaring war, with all that it implies.
            2. Barabashka 68
              Barabashka 68 10 March 2018 11: 45
              +5
              Stormbreaker. And you are sure that it’s more, naivety. Well, name the sites from which they can be launched in a volley! What sites are not called (in view of their absence?) That's just the same.
              But are there few carriers? Yes, and launched them already with a hundred.
            3. Igor1980
              Igor1980 10 March 2018 12: 29
              +5
              You either pretend or in life, can you still have the keys to the hut on a golden plate where the money is, give the coordinates of the sites to him, go to x .. troll
            4. Petrix
              Petrix 11 March 2018 09: 50
              +5
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Well, name the platforms from which they can be launched in one gulp!




              Look for similar sites on duty near the shores of the “partners”.
        2. serezhasoldatow
          serezhasoldatow 10 March 2018 11: 34
          +7
          Thousands of us do not need rockets. You need tens of thousands from the United States, because only a few without anti-aircraft defense achieve their goals
        3. businessv
          businessv 10 March 2018 12: 19
          +5
          Quote: Lex.
          how many of those very calibres of them should thousands stand in the us

          And why calibers "rivet" if there is a "Dagger" ?! Yeah, I realized that amers have so many Tamagavks so that 500 pieces for each attack of the “Dagger” can be spent apart from if the operational command post escapes! wink
          1. Lex.
            Lex. 10 March 2018 14: 25
            +1
            Actually, the dagger mig-31 carries calibers in batches
      2. flicker
        flicker 10 March 2018 20: 52
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        10 days left to vigorously admire our new weapons, "which will shock the world. Already 10 days in all the Russian media about the same thing. Or is it hard for our readers, or is it already a trend for making money on advertising? belay
        It’s not because it’s tight, it’s not a trend - these are just tectonic shifts in the formation of a new world order. That such a tiny event happened.
    5. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 10 March 2018 11: 57
      +16
      Quote: Salute
      what would be considered important to Russia and weapons and the power of the economy, with the second, not everything is simple

      That's who they fear in the West and this is the main weapon of the Russians! It was and will be .. Such peasants, even where they reach and they will take any enemy capital ..
      And everything else, this is the app to them! soldier

      Eternal memory to them is the soldiers of the Russian infantry .. Nothing could stop them when they get angry!
    6. Nick
      Nick 13 March 2018 14: 35
      0
      Quote: Salute
      what would be considered important to Russia and weapons and the power of the economy, with the second, not everything is simple

      And who has it easy? Both China and the United States have their own economic problems. In Russia their own. Nothing critical for us in the Russian economy, and Thank God
  2. Vard
    Vard 10 March 2018 06: 24
    +6
    By value, this is all comparable to atomic weapons ... Like there is no method against scrap ... And they have no other scrap ... And the main thing is not to overthrow this advantage ....
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Alexey N
    Alexey N 10 March 2018 06: 39
    +7
    There will be no queues. The hegemon will press with terrible force on the satellites, not hesitating to eliminate possible defectors with all the power of special services and a wallet.
    It is necessary to build allied relations with serious players, breaking them out of Western structures. First of all, China, covering it with a nuclear umbrella in the southeast, but involving in the redistribution of the BV. After the resource tap is closed, Europe itself will fall into the hands of the winners, and the shit-goers from across the ocean will have to curtail their bases, and the opportunity offered to them to drive us in the arms sphere without finding demand and financing will narrow down to the virtual sphere.
    But to flatter yourself and relax is obviously early.
    https://aftershock.news/?q=comment/5150462#commen
    t-5150462
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 10 March 2018 07: 15
      +4
      Alexey N Today, 06:39 AM After the resource tap is closed, Europe itself will fall into the hands of the winners,

      If you mean our, Russian gas, then the mericatos can do it - they will instantly “pick up the flag that fell out of their hands” and force the geyropu to buy them liquefied at their meritic prices, which, as we know, are quite high. And the rest I agree with your conclusions.
      1. Alexey N
        Alexey N 10 March 2018 07: 43
        +9
        Omerika does not have any LNG. Neither gas, nor delivery vehicles in commodity quantities.
        Neither now nor later.
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 10 March 2018 07: 47
          +2
          Alexey N Today, 07:43 ↑
          Omerika does not have any LNG.

          But, I would not say so categorically ... Something is there and even for sale, because there Congress allowed to sell the surplus ...
          1. businessv
            businessv 10 March 2018 12: 22
            +5
            Quote: aszzz888
            allowed to sell surplus ...

            this is the key phrase! Surplus! Now we need to find them! In the meantime, two tankers have already rocked with Russian LNG
            1. aszzz888
              aszzz888 10 March 2018 12: 37
              +2
              businessv Today, 12:22 PM In the meantime, two tankers have already rocked with Russian LNG.

              Yes. Here I agree with you.
        2. flicker
          flicker 10 March 2018 10: 13
          +3
          no delivery vehicles in commodity quantities
          About 500 LNG tankers are needed to cover gas demand in Europe.
        3. sapporo1959
          sapporo1959 10 March 2018 12: 57
          +3
          Maybe not, but it scares the patriots unnecessarily, because if we don’t sell gas, we will naturally sit only with rockets. Well, as you know, you won’t put rockets on bread and you won’t pour them in a glass ..
          1. Nick
            Nick 13 March 2018 14: 46
            0
            Quote: sapporo1959
            Maybe not, but it scares the patriots unnecessarily, because if we don’t sell gas, we will naturally sit only with rockets. Well, as you know, you won’t put rockets on bread and you won’t pour them in a glass ..

            Yes, stop it! Everything in Russia already exists, and what to wear, and what to spread on bread, and how to fight with an adversary. Made with us!
    2. midivan
      midivan 10 March 2018 08: 01
      +4
      Quote: Alexey N
      The hegemon will press with terrible force on the satellites, not hesitating to eliminate possible defectors with all the power of special services and a wallet.

      Well, they are like cockroaches and they will scatter through the cracks and pull them out later. I think Ryzhik will not buragoz, it threatens him with loneliness, since Smoked has left such an inheritance that he has to rake for another ten years. At the moment, Trump would have to squander openly with GDP and send all the money for wood with mutual support and begin to quietly crush reptiles like Soros and K "like here and here with us, this is real time and a chance to restore order in the world. friendships are observed, there were precedents though small like this-
      MOSCOW, Mar 10 - RIA News. US President Donald Trump held a meeting with representatives of the gaming industry, congressmen and members of parent organizations to discuss the problem of violence in video games, which showed a cut of violent scenes from games, writes The Verge. Among other things, the compilation included an episode from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, in which terrorists shoot the passengers in a story at an airport in Moscow ............ At the meeting, the president urged developers to tighten age limits on video games and volunteer take other measures to “improve the industry,” reports The Verge. Representatives of the companies, in turn, presented scientific studies that refute the connection between violence in games and cruelty in real life.

      RIA News https://ria.ru/world/20180310/1516065507.html
      Quote: Alexey N
      It is necessary to build allied relations with serious players, breaking them out of Western structures.

      It’s impossible to break it out, here an approach to everyone is needed and mutual interest request
      Quote: Alexey N
      After the resource tap is closed, Europe itself will fall into the hands of the winners, and the shit-goers from across the ocean will have to curtail their bases, and the opportunity offered to them to drive us in the arms sphere without finding demand and financing will narrow down to the virtual sphere.

      Revenge for all resentment the soul asks? No. GDP will not do this, he doesn’t need it, as I understood it (as far as I could understand) He is for Peace in the World yes and me too repeat I have long believed so that if everyone takes up the mind and lay down all weapons in the CWC, then in years, a maximum of 20t, we will have at least soil from Mars smile
      1. Essex62
        Essex62 10 March 2018 11: 15
        +9
        This is you tell the freemasons. World - all over the world for them an incredible horror. What can GDP opposite be there? Colored paper walks through the expanses of the Russian Empire and agents of influence of a business street rule here. You can show cartoons as you like, in fact we are a occupied country.
    3. Lelek
      Lelek 10 March 2018 11: 17
      +4
      Quote: Alexey N
      It is necessary to build allied relations with serious players, breaking them out of Western structures.

      hi
      You are right, it is necessary. And this is being done, albeit slowly, sometimes imperceptibly, but it is being done. Not all in this world are "blockheads" like Washington "sitters". Already, Austrians scratch their heads, and the French vote against NATO membership:

      And in Italy, changes are not marked:

      And these notorious sanctions to all "Europeans" (and not only) are sick of it. The Anglo-Saxons of the European and overseas spills alone continue this mantra of tougher sanctions. Yes, and to hell with them. yes
    4. Nick
      Nick 13 March 2018 14: 37
      0
      Quote: Alexey N
      But to flatter yourself and relax is obviously early.

      Yes and no need at all ... hi
  6. shinobi
    shinobi 10 March 2018 07: 02
    +9
    Wangyu. After the hysteria in the mattress has subsided, they will pretend that nothing happened. Actually, as it is. That’s what our guarantor voiced, this is not news for specialists. And this will happen right after the election.
    PS: They’re hysterical only because they were told right in person by their capabilities that are far from what was declared. Which is also not news for a long time.
    1. midivan
      midivan 10 March 2018 08: 15
      +7
      Quote: shinobi
      PS: They’re hysterical only because they were told directly to them by their capabilities that they’re far from the declared ones. Which is also not news for a long time.

      They are also hysterical because they announced to the whole world how they tore our economy to shreds, and shredded the nooks and crannies and showed everyone where the sleeve is sewn laughing Well, of course it’s a shame to them, whatever one may say, and the primer on diplomacy and ethics will have to get and read.
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 March 2018 07: 11
    +10
    For the first time, Russia has become a runner-up from evading. Those systems that are named by the president are not so much for defense, but for retaliation. And if we discard the "peace-loving rhetoric", then for the attack. Now we can also "misinterpret" something.

    Well now, the author, hold on, all the fingers will fly, each letter will be sucked, disputed and turned inside out. To the author, A. Staver fat plus! good
    1. flicker
      flicker 10 March 2018 10: 22
      +4
      Well, now, the author, hold on, all the fingers will fly, each letter will be sucked, disputed and turned inside out. To the author, A. Staver fat plus! good
      This is exactly yes yesterday everyone argued that the AUG must still be detected, and if they do, then the "Dagger" will not fall into it. etc laughing
  8. Yak28
    Yak28 10 March 2018 07: 38
    +3
    All the weapons that Putin boasted weren’t a secret, these developments have been carried out since Soviet times, and they’re not fools in the United States either, and they’re developing the same thing. Here, it seems to me, by hypersound, lasers have more interesting weapons. weapons to destroy or disable enemy satellite constellations, transfer explosive energy over distances, etc., etc. Yes, and the United States seems to be doing the same, plus do not understand how the working HARP (HAARP). I do not agree with the author, the USSR is not always caught up with the United States, by the mid-80s in rocketry, in the construction of submarines and in many other things the USSR had gone forward for decades.
    Today, in the event of a major war, Russia has the weakest point: a small amount of human resources compared to the United States and especially NATO, Russia will not be able to make up for military losses for a long time. I will add that most victories in significant battles in the history of the Russian Empire and the USSR. thanks to the numerical advantage.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 10 March 2018 07: 54
      +9
      I will add that most victories in significant battles in the history of the Russian Empire, the USSR. Russians were won thanks to the numerical advantage.

      And how many people had the Entente and Soviets in 18? And how much was at the beginning of the Second World War on both sides. So, your untruth.
      Together with the German armies, the armies of Italy, Romania, Hungary, Finland and volunteer formations from Croatia, Slovakia, Spain, Holland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and other European countries attacked the USSR.

      June 22, 1941 crossed the border of the USSR and invaded our land 5,5 million soldiers and officers of Nazi Germany and its satellites, but in terms of the number of troops the armed forces of only one Germany exceeded the Armed Forces of the USSR 1,6 times, namely: 8,5 million people in the Wehrmacht and a little over 5 million people in the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army. Together with the allied armies, Germany had at least 22.06.1941 million trained, armed soldiers and officers on 11 and could very quickly make up for the losses of its army and strengthen its troops.
      1. Yak28
        Yak28 10 March 2018 09: 07
        +2
        I didn’t have warriors, but victories in certain battles, for example, the Swedes near Poltava, the Kursk Bulge, etc. The skill is certainly good, but with a numerical advantage it is even better. Despite the strength of the Nazi army and allies, the USSR was not Russia either because of its huge territory and large population, despite the huge losses in the first and second world war, the Russian Empire and then the USSR not only did not cease to exist, but also won the war against almost all of Europe. And today, almost all the republics of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, together with their infrastructure, people, territory in NATO, or seeks there.
        Therefore, today's Russia, in comparison with the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR, is already in a more unpresentable situation. Fortunately, there are nuclear weapons that so far hold back the passions, but for the time being, until the states can defend themselves.
    2. Boris55
      Boris55 10 March 2018 09: 17
      +9
      Quote: Yak28
      thanks to the numerical advantage.

      What are you talking about? Military casualties The USSR and Nazi Germany (not counting their allies) are comparable. But the fact that they destroyed 20 million civilians - women, children, the elderly, we will never forget this and will not let others forget.
    3. businessv
      businessv 10 March 2018 12: 33
      +6
      Quote: Yak28
      I will add that most victories in significant battles in the history of the Russian Empire, the USSR. Russians were won thanks to the numerical advantage.

      Damn, do you seriously consider the number of bayonets in the army to be the most important condition for victory ?! First of all, the war is a test of the strength of the spirit of the people, the country's economy, ammunition and weapons of the army (I do not mention the command staff)! The numerical advantage can play a role in a single battle and only, but not in the war as a whole!
      1. Dante Alighieri
        Dante Alighieri 10 March 2018 19: 14
        +1
        Damn, do you seriously consider the number of bayonets in the army to be the most important condition for victory ?! First of all, the war is a test of the strength of the spirit of the people, the country's economy, ammunition and weapons of the army (I do not mention the command staff)! The numerical advantage can play a role in a single battle and only, but not in the war as a whole!

        Yeah, with a tight formation. No, I understand that after the collapse of the USSR, the study of philosophy is a disaster. Only if gentlemen liberals did not disown the Marxist heritage, then they are not able to repeal the laws of the same dialectic of Heigel (the fundamental basis of the materialistic approach).
        In particular, in this case we are talking about such a not unknown law as the transition of quantitative changes to qualitative ones.
        It is this law (albeit with some adjustment regarding the issues under consideration, where a qualitative transition means military success over its adversary) clearly illustrates why the USSR won the Second World War while, although not fundamentally more technologically advanced, Germany lost ( take at least the same T-34, though not the most perfect, but the most massive tank of the Great Patriotic War). It is this law that tells us that even if we possess "weapons that have no analogues in the world" (ala Tiger tank or Faust missiles - since we reason from the innovations of the Second World War), we can still lose by less technologically equipped, but more to numerous opponents. And to call less prepared and small US Armed Forces the language is unlikely to turn at least one sane person.
        So, to summarize: only referring to statistical data on the number of carriers of missile weapons, aircraft, tanks and human resources and industrial production capabilities is the main and key factor that allows us to predict the development of a military conflict. That is why to level the value of this indicator is at least stupid, and even simply criminal. All other factors you listed in the person of “fighting spirit”, etc., fit into the 5% error, since one soldier's fighting spirit can be conditionally equal to + 10 xp, and the other -10, which will not affect the overall temperature in the hospital. Moreover, there is no need to talk about the "quality" of the overwhelming mass of today's Russian population and the Russian economy - you yourself see everything.
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 March 2018 08: 02
    +3
    massive enlightenment of European governments will begin
    So smart in Europe have long understood that the Americans will not only not protect them, but also expose them to attack. But the EU has neither the strength nor the will to say this honestly and send the United States with their military initiatives to hell. Therefore, in the near future there will be no "lines", but a desire to speak with Russia as a human being will appear.
  10. samarin1969
    samarin1969 10 March 2018 08: 37
    +9
    There are many fronts "virtual" and quite real, on which the Americans are able to "win." And for this it will not be necessary to use nuclear weapons or some “Aegis” ...
    The "missile theme" did not appear during the escalation of military confrontation, but before the election.
    No matter how formidable Russian weapons are, the policy of the “RF” is determined not by the military, but by “money” generals.
    1. sergei_55
      sergei_55 10 March 2018 15: 47
      +3
      The missile theme came in response to Trump's statement on the use of nuclear weapons. Trump said before our elections, probably our man. In response to the horror story I received the horror story. Well, before the election, it was successful, as someone wrote here, Putin knocked out a pill from under the feet of competitors.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. populist
    populist 10 March 2018 08: 44
    +10
    New weapons of Russia as a guarantee of changes in the world political system

    There will be no changes in the global political system in connection with the advent of new Russian weapons.
    1 This weapon is not yet.
    2 Use these weapons only in the event of a nuclear disaster.
    3 The US keeps its “allies” in obedience to a wide variety of open and secret methods.
    4 We are incredibly weak politically, economically, organizationally, and so on and so forth.
    1. cats
      cats 10 March 2018 13: 10
      +8
      Pyotr Lyakseyich .. you? ..
      So we are not talking about Ukraine, we woke up in vain .. request
      1. sapporo1959
        sapporo1959 11 March 2018 12: 41
        +2
        So it’s clear that it’s not about Ukraine, once they profiled it, they took Crimea, but hostile Ukraine was at hand thanks to the president’s wise policy. So, we had to whisper about our tandem before waking up ...
        1. cats
          cats 11 March 2018 18: 33
          +3
          Quote: sapporo1959
          hostile Ukraine at hand and seized thanks to the wise policy of the president.

          Are you also disappointed that Putin is not gender, and Medvedev is not Batman?
          1. sapporo1959
            sapporo1959 11 March 2018 20: 06
            0
            Well, yes, it’s clearly not Batman who’s gotten an enemy right by the side. Although in another sense there’s even entertainment for servants. That’s with Putin, and we’ve already with Bandera, snot is flying ...
  12. serg999
    serg999 10 March 2018 08: 47
    +6
    Quote: Yak28
    I will add that most victories in significant battles in the history of the Russian Empire, the USSR. Russians were won thanks to the numerical advantage.

    You balabol, but don’t get sick, balabol your soul. Remember, son, all the Greatest Victories of Russian Warriors were just the same with the numerical superiority of the enemy, often overwhelming: the rout of the Khazar Khaganate, the Battle of Ice, the Battle of Molody (1572), the Moscow Battle (Minin and Pozharsky), the Battle of Poltava , the naval battle in Chesme Bay, the battle of Kozludzhi (1774), the capture of Izmail, and indeed all the battles of Suvorov are victories with the enemy numerically superior, the battle at Cape Tendra (Ushakov defeated the Turks without any losses), Borodino, the battle of Elisavetpol (1826 ), the capture of Erivani, the battle of Sarykamysh, the Brusilovsky breakthrough (1st MV), the battle for Moscow. And such key victories as in the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk, the capture of Berlin, the Russians had a very insignificant advantage, which could not play a significant role. I called it only the largest and key battles, if you call small ones, I’ll write a week ... Learn the story, boy, and do not disgrace like that anymore ...
  13. groks
    groks 10 March 2018 08: 52
    +9
    Now, to any threat of the Russian Federation can respond .... cartoons? And sometimes cartoons with obscure devices that do not know what they are doing.

    It is sad that Staver hit the electoral brechology. With past articles it really fits very weakly. When already these elections of Putin will pass and the people will return to adequacy.
    1. populist
      populist 10 March 2018 09: 45
      +2
      groks
      Now, to any threat of the Russian Federation can respond .... cartoons? And sometimes cartoons with obscure devices that do not know what they are doing.

      good

      When already these elections of Putin will pass and the people will return to adequacy.

      Among other things, these elections serve as a test of loyalty to their proclaimed ideals. winked In these elections, for example, such a red-red and Marxist-Marxist publicist-politician-political scientist like Konstantin Semin burnt down. So, some will never return to adequacy. negative
      1. groks
        groks 10 March 2018 11: 28
        0
        Did Semin climb into this showdown? And spoke out in favor ... well, one of two and both are the same.
        Well - capitalism however.
        1. populist
          populist 10 March 2018 13: 29
          +1
          groks
          Did Semin climb into this showdown?

          So they imprisoned him for that, then they put him on TV and let them shoot at the right time.
          And spoke in favor

          Semin appeared anti-breastfeeding video "Visiting a fairy tale." After that I had to release a video with a clumsy attempt to justify myself.
          Well - capitalism however

          Manipulation of consciousness.
          1. groks
            groks 10 March 2018 13: 35
            +1
            Well, maybe even the anti-Putin zabatsat in time. It will be more decent.
            1. populist
              populist 10 March 2018 15: 31
              +1
              Well, maybe even anti-Putin.

              It will not be able against the owner.
              1. ML-334
                ML-334 10 March 2018 16: 10
                +1
                A cuckoo praises a rooster for praising a cuckoo.
  14. Voyager
    Voyager 10 March 2018 09: 22
    0
    Isn't Yu-71 and Vanguard the same?
  15. emwave
    emwave 10 March 2018 09: 50
    +1
    In the contest, I would like to recall the changes that have occurred in the world after the development of nuclear weapons in the USSR. In that situation, the USSR was catching up with the United States. Now the United States will catch up with Russia.
    1. Bo Yari
      Bo Yari 10 March 2018 11: 28
      +8
      why rave? Why is this self-deception?
    2. flicker
      flicker 10 March 2018 21: 07
      +3
      Quote: emwave
      In the contest, I would like to recall the changes that have occurred in the world after the development of nuclear weapons in the USSR. In that situation, the USSR was catching up with the United States. Now the United States will catch up with Russia.

      They will not catch up with us N IK O G D A.
      "About once a month, on Friday or Saturday night, Silicon Valley technocrats gather for sex and drug-related parties. Sometimes these gatherings are held in a gigantic mansion located in one of San Francisco's elite neighborhoods. Sometimes guests travel to a suburban residence in the valley Napa or on private beach properties in Malibu. Places change, but many participants and their goals remain unchanged, says journalist Emily Chang in her new book, Brotopia
      They already live well good
  16. gguess
    gguess 10 March 2018 09: 51
    +2
    To strengthen the country's defense capability, the anticipated development of missile defense, and not strategic offensive arms, is necessary! And Moscow is not all of Russia ...
  17. cariperpaint
    cariperpaint 10 March 2018 10: 05
    +7
    people do you have some kind of aggravation? is there no such term in military nature to fight on equal terms? something like wall to wall or something? The Kulikovo battle was a long time ago. initially such a company could not be equal with the same but buried in the ground and disguised in ambush. all that was voiced by the commander in chief is that the protective equipment that they built became zero. all. and not that we are on equal terms with someone. some kind of game has been flying for so many days ... it doesn’t make sense for us to get any equality. from the word at all.
  18. Bo Yari
    Bo Yari 10 March 2018 11: 26
    +2
    [quote] I will not talk about the performance characteristics of the weapons that Putin spoke about. [/ quote [quote = flicker] [quote] Us - not up to the chase! [/ quote] Here, the same opinion. Maybe China, but not the USA. [/ Quote]
    uzhos ...
  19. andrew xnumx
    andrew xnumx 10 March 2018 11: 41
    +2
    New weapons cannot but delight. There is a feeling that we will finally be reliably protected and able to engage in the development of our economy. Only in no case should we agree to such agreements with the Americans that would provide for a further reduction in our nuclear weapons. They are so reduced to the utmost minimum. And if you count the number of missile defense that the United States already has, it just becomes scary. In this regard, I would like to ask readers of Military Review a very naive question. Maybe a competent person will answer it. The question sounds something like this: “If you forget about all our latest weapons for a second. Is there still a classic strike against our potential enemy with ballistic missiles, both from submarines and ground-based through the North Pole, taking into account the US missile defense systems and radars in Greenland and Alaska? Or did the Americans deploy such a dense missile defense umbrella over the Arctic Ocean that now we can only rely on cruise missiles and other latest weapons? "
    1. dauria
      dauria 10 March 2018 20: 52
      0
      Is there still a classic strike against our potential adversary with ballistic missiles,


      If they could hit with impunity, they would have hit long ago. Have you forgotten Hiroshima? And now, in addition, there is a “viewer” in the form of China, who is waiting for such happiness to instantly become the first and sell Pepsi Cola for the yuan on the ruins of Los Angeles. Previously (in 1979) they had - 110-120 million from them, 120 - from the USSR. For the collapse of an empire, a quarter of these losses will be enough for them.
  20. groks
    groks 10 March 2018 11: 45
    +3
    What did you mean? If you hang a rocket on a good Soviet fighter, use the fighter as the first stage of a rocket, then later you can throw it somewhere at a very high speed. Not very well imagining where exactly, since adjusting the flight is not very successful.
    Or is it that the Voivode is being removed from the database, and instead of them it is proposed to put Sarmat (who is not there yet), with unknown crap, with wings taxing the alleged missile defense areas. Estimated since the partners on the ships are striving for that missile defense to fuck up. And this is instead of the guaranteed 10 BB and hundreds of LC Voivode?
    Is this definitely overwhelming? Or is it waving to Western politicians and waving to the Western military-industrial complex?
    1. flicker
      flicker 11 March 2018 01: 15
      +1
      Is this definitely overwhelming?
      With the help of it to the neighbors.
      Or is it waving to Western politicians and waving to the Western military-industrial complex?
      But the point is, the Pentagon has already bent all the bankers and the Fed - they pay him loot as a tribute.
      Not very well imagining where exactly, since adjusting the flight is not very successful.
      Not a problem at all. And how do planes adjust their flight? A flight route is lined up for the intended target area, there is an intermediate adjustment of the movement by dispatchers or via satellites (but it can also go according to the laid program), at the place of the intended target, the GOS is turned on, which finds the object of attack, the AI ​​selects the most suitable attack path, well, the target’s attack itself . Once again, no problem at all. Any AUG will sink.
      1. groks
        groks 11 March 2018 08: 05
        +3
        Yes, it seems, not only to the neighbors. Some of us begin to jump at the mention of the guarantor.
        The problem is that a plasma cloud forms around the apparatus in hypersound. And through it, the connection does not go well into any way.
        1. flicker
          flicker 11 March 2018 09: 33
          +1
          a plasma cloud is formed. And through it, the connection does not go well into any way.
          Forced to upset, but in Russia this problem was solved.
          1. groks
            groks 11 March 2018 11: 04
            +3
            I know. Torsion fields, fasting and prayer.
            1. flicker
              flicker 11 March 2018 11: 29
              +1
              I know. Torsion fields, fasting and prayer.
              Forgot to add: and a careful reading of the Talmud.
  21. Olgovich
    Olgovich 10 March 2018 11: 49
    +1
    the systems called by the president are not so much for defense as for retaliation.

    A retaliatory strike is an element of defense, IMHO.
    Think, can you name the Soviet or Russian weapons that would be exported abroad without the existence of much better weapons in our army?

    "Shell C1" was developed precisely by order of the UAE, due to which Russia also has
  22. Radikal
    Radikal 10 March 2018 12: 15
    +1
    Quote: Barabashka 68
    "When!? Yes, in the days of the USSR ... Of course, in different years it’s different. But economies are simply incomparable. And the bogeyman of a" new weapon "is temporary. And his guarantor raised it because there is nothing else." - when you finally understand that our country is not Sweden and not even Germany together with France. Size, climate, wars not unleashed by us, revolutions from the outside. Today, sanctions are strangling energy. Yes, and whiners here and throughout the country letting snot. Do not like it - do it better.
    They won’t give. No.
  23. Radikal
    Radikal 10 March 2018 12: 19
    +2
    Quote: Lex.
    To shake the world, you first need to rivet them in acceptable quantities, how many of those very calibres of them must be thousands of standing in the United States

    yes hi
  24. av58
    av58 10 March 2018 12: 28
    0
    The reaction to Vladimir Putin’s speech is mixed so far: from horror to statements that the President of Russia is bluffing out of habit. In this statement, even the usually neatly Chinese words managed to light up. In order to convince the world, and especially the United States and its Pacific allies such as Japan, Australia and New Zealand, of the seriousness of information about Russia's new weapons, it would be nice to conduct an indicative use of such weapons. For example, a cruise missile with a nuclear propulsion system, which, as reported, has no range limitations, could fly with the installed beacon (so that they could see and track the flight) from the borders of Russia across the Pacific Ocean wherever the side of New Zealand circled over Antarctica, and then, after completing the circle, go near Japan and return to any Russian missile training ground. I think that after that NATO generals and politicians will quickly bite their tongues.
    1. groks
      groks 10 March 2018 13: 40
      +4
      Which is mixed? Who?
      This crap, in principle, should not have been. Our policy is peaceful and the doctrine is defensive. And then the second Tukhachevsky got out and let's show cartoons.
  25. Snowblast
    Snowblast 10 March 2018 12: 30
    +8
    From these cartoony Kremlin wunderwafes in the USA, Chip and Dale got excited. Already in a hurry to help!
    The Kremlin’s military spending in 2014 was $ 91 billion, with $ 2018 planned for 46 - half as much. And in the United States for 2018, 700 billion is planned - 15 times more.
    Did Putin secretly build this child prodigy from snot and matches? Who does the Kremlin frighten with its weakness?
    1. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 11 March 2018 19: 25
      +3
      China is appealing to us even more interesting, due to territories for rent for a period of 49 years. For example, a forest, which almost did not remain in the Angara region and around Lake Baikal. About this in the election opus, not a word, not a word. I will not be surprised that the same will happen with the Kuril Islands.
  26. Alexander Nezgovorov
    Alexander Nezgovorov 10 March 2018 12: 58
    +4
    pre-made customized PR ....
  27. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 10 March 2018 13: 02
    +2
    Quote: Snowblast
    From these cartoony Kremlin wunderwafes in the USA, Chip and Dale got excited. Already in a hurry to help!
    The Kremlin’s military spending in 2014 was $ 91 billion, with $ 2018 planned for 46 - half as much. And in the United States for 2018, 700 billion is planned - 15 times more.
    Did Putin secretly build this child prodigy from snot and matches? Who does the Kremlin frighten with its weakness?


    The calculator will help you. Compare the dollar exchange rate over the years. At least the costs have not changed. We, unlike the United States, do weapons in our own countries, for rubles. We also pay the salaries of military personnel and designers.
    1. groks
      groks 10 March 2018 13: 42
      +5
      Where do we get rubles? Yes, we sell oil and gas.
      1. sergei_55
        sergei_55 10 March 2018 15: 53
        +1
        do it yourself groks can sell
        1. groks
          groks 10 March 2018 15: 57
          +3
          Did. Drive on topics Coalition, Boomerang, ....
          1. sergei_55
            sergei_55 10 March 2018 16: 20
            0
            Can you sell, but is there a buyer?
            1. groks
              groks 10 March 2018 18: 03
              +4
              The buyer is. The buyer has little money. The buyer has little money, since we have no budget. and where does the money come from? Oil Gas.
    2. Snowblast
      Snowblast 10 March 2018 17: 50
      +1
      Quote: Xscorpion
      A calculator to help you. Compare the dollar over the years.

      As I understand it, you don’t know how to use the calculator, and what is the course you don’t understand? Do you need help in these matters?
  28. Wolka
    Wolka 10 March 2018 14: 19
    0
    a good deterrent for arrogant and hot heads ...
  29. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 10 March 2018 16: 33
    0
    Quote: Salute
    what would be considered important to Russia and weapons and the power of the economy, with the second, not everything is simple

    I completely agree with the conclusions of Staver! But his article is not about economics. Although your statement is certainly true! Today, the GDP was able to deal with the "sworn partners" in a purely eastern tradition - the enemy realized that he had been defeated before the start of the fight! Bravo! Now it's time (while others do not interfere) to deal with internal problems. It’s time to descale the boiler so that the turbine runs at full power!
  30. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 10 March 2018 17: 16
    +3
    "in a situation where we are forced to" catch up "with a probable adversary, our not-yet-stable economy will inevitably lose to the West. We will be forced to spend more than we can and still lag behind. We are not ready to confront the consolidated West. And now, in addition to the shield, we also got sword."
    Perfectly in the hole. That is why the president personally pleased me. Although I did not see the whole performance. I was at work, what should I do? .. Nobody canceled the timing of manufacturing platforms for Caliber at the Black Sea Fleet.
  31. dDYHA
    dDYHA 10 March 2018 17: 28
    +4
    The children of officials live abroad. Who will give the command to send rockets there?
    1. Petrol cutter
      Petrol cutter 10 March 2018 17: 49
      +3
      I think this will happen automatically. Where, whose children, no one will care. As they say, who did not hide, I’m not to blame ...
  32. Snowblast
    Snowblast 10 March 2018 17: 53
    +4
    Quote: sib.ataman
    It’s time to descale the boiler so that the turbine runs at full power!

    Right! The main problem is in the Kremlin and the Kremlin-backing pozriots who are dying from low-profile toons.
    1. Petrol cutter
      Petrol cutter 10 March 2018 18: 25
      +5
      The fact is that we don’t die of toons. We create with our own hands what we painted there. From this personally my joints hurt all at night, my back hurts. But these are my personal problems, but we work. What do you personally do to strengthen the country's defense capability?
  33. Operator
    Operator 10 March 2018 17: 57
    +4
    Two years later, the ban on the export of offensive weapons to Iran expires.

    It's time to start preparing large-scale deliveries to Iran of the Dagger complex as part of the new MiG-41 and the developed Iskander-M, and under two different contracts (to comply with the agreement on the non-proliferation of medium-range missile technologies).

    We’ll cut down the Iranian grandmothers to finance the production of the MiG-41 for the Russian Aerospace Forces and we will solve geopolitical issues in the Middle East bully
    1. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 11 March 2018 19: 38
      +2
      The main danger for Russia is precisely in such thoughts as yours, Operator, in the manic desire to sell everything, absolutely not thinking about the consequences. The Angara forest has already been sold at the root, it is no longer there, and it will be so in everything! You are our trade!
      1. Operator
        Operator 11 March 2018 20: 36
        0
        Something must be addressed with the Israeli occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights, for example, with the help of the fraternal Syrians of the Persian people.

        Are you for the Israeli occupation of the Golan?
        1. Evgeniy667b
          Evgeniy667b 12 March 2018 06: 46
          +1
          It is easier to come to an agreement with Israel, but the East, as Comrade Sukhov said, is a delicate and dark matter. Egypt apparently taught us nothing. So Syria is with us today, tomorrow it will run to the same uses, therefore whose Golan will be, let it be decided without our participation!
          1. Operator
            Operator 12 March 2018 08: 46
            +1
            This is exactly what I am proposing: we need to cut off the money from Iran for the deployment of the MiG-41 + Iskander-M production, and let the graters rub together without us with Syria and Israel bully
            1. Evgeniy667b
              Evgeniy667b 12 March 2018 18: 43
              0
              Squandering secret technology is a crime against your country .. Let Syria and Iran themselves "Might." For us to fight, if something, no one will be.
              1. Operator
                Operator 12 March 2018 19: 02
                +1
                Technologies are known only to the technologists of factories producing weapons. Persians and Syrians will not receive them.

                The Persians will not fight with Israel for us, but for themselves - like Vietnam and the USA (the difference is that the Persians will pay for weapons).
                1. Evgeniy667b
                  Evgeniy667b 13 March 2018 19: 11
                  0
                  There is such a saying, a cat scratches on its ridge, and in our time about arms trading! Weapons are made for the defense of the country, primarily and not for dubious operations. The pursuit of the dough is the department of the old woman with a scythe in a black hoodie.
                  1. Operator
                    Operator 13 March 2018 20: 41
                    0
                    The trade (with profit) in weapons with the right countries is a one-shot hit in two birds with one stone: making money for the Russian military-industrial complex and solving our foreign policy tasks with the wrong hands.
                    1. Evgeniy667b
                      Evgeniy667b 14 March 2018 08: 50
                      0
                      This is a boomerang that returns and hits the head of the one who launched it. Illusions, illusions and again illusions!
                      1. Operator
                        Operator 14 March 2018 08: 53
                        0
                        Vietnam is not at all like a boomerang.
  34. Snowblast
    Snowblast 10 March 2018 19: 11
    +3
    Quote: Benzorez
    The fact is that we don’t die of toons. We create with our own hands what we painted there. From this personally, my joints hurt all at night, my back hurts

    Have you tried creating your head?
    1. Petrol cutter
      Petrol cutter 10 March 2018 19: 36
      +3
      Well, what question is such an answer ... Have you tried to work with your hands?! ..
      From the head, the steamer will only go through paper spaces. And in metal, my friend who sculpts it ?! May bi new techniques developed, I went out somewhere ?!
  35. Budilnik
    Budilnik 10 March 2018 20: 15
    +1
    confrontation and further heated conflict between good and evil cannot be avoided. the American devil, as a worm, will corrode Russia from within, working with the consciousness of the younger generation, changing the mentality of the people, tearing it away from moral principles and historical roots, through culture, education, etc. and so on and never stop ... even an infinitely patient and fair person sometimes need to decide on a fight ...
  36. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 10 March 2018 22: 54
    +1
    Quote: Snowblast
    Quote: Xscorpion
    A calculator to help you. Compare the dollar over the years.

    As I understand it, you don’t know how to use the calculator, and what is the course you don’t understand? Do you need help in these matters?


    I don’t, even a second-grader can see that defense spending remained at the same level. And it would not hurt you to finish school
  37. Snowblast
    Snowblast 11 March 2018 01: 23
    +1
    Quote: Xscorpion
    Quote: Snowblast
    Quote: Xscorpion
    A calculator to help you. Compare the dollar over the years.

    As I understand it, you don’t know how to use the calculator, and what is the course you don’t understand? Do you need help in these matters?


    I don’t, even a second-grader can see that defense spending remained at the same level. And it would not hurt you to finish school

    Does a second-grader see that $ 91 billion in 2014 is $ 46 billion in 2018? And you are a graduate of this school ???
  38. PVL176
    PVL176 11 March 2018 02: 08
    +4
    By military and economic strength, Russia is a weak likeness of the USSR, its pale shadow. Some adult smart people made speeches and listened to promising "wunderwaffes." Other adult smart people seriously discuss and admire all this. What is it? Magnetic storm? Collective insanity? It would be funny if it weren’t so sad ...
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 11 March 2018 07: 24
      +1
      Quote: PVL176
      By military and economic strength, Russia is a weak likeness of the USSR, its pale shadow.

      In fact, yes! But in fact, Russia still surpassed the USSR! We are now accused of participating in elections in the USA, cyber attacks and hybrid wars .. I don’t remember something like that in the days of the USSR! Ideology, which bound the hands of the USSR, we don’t have it now (on the one hand it’s good, on the other hand it’s not so ..) We play now according to the “rules” of the West and begin to beat them .. We are learning fast! he he
  39. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 11 March 2018 07: 17
    +1
    Russia in its history has repeatedly changed dramatically the political and economic alignment on the planet ... Unfortunately, with great losses (alone had to stand to death ..)
    This is our mission! And Putin also did not appear casual ...
    I really hope that this time it will do without a world war .. Few Russians remain! soldier
    1. cedar
      cedar 11 March 2018 07: 44
      +3
      With the weapons that we have, there is not much to war.
      And for a peaceful life twice as much as we have is very desirable.
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 11 March 2018 08: 17
        +1
        Quote: cedar
        With the weapons that we have, there is not much to war.
        And for a peaceful life twice as much as we have is very desirable.

        That's right ..! The west would lag behind us and let us live peacefully, we would quickly recover in EVERYTHING! But alas, Russia is not included in the plans of the West as a strong and powerful power and has never been included .. We interfere, we establish “world domination” to one degree or another .. We are restless and have a sense of justice in our hearts!
        Anecdote:
        Is there life on Mars..?
        Нет!
        Why..?
        Because the Russians would have already begun to help them!

        Funny and sad ... laughing hi
        1. cedar
          cedar 12 March 2018 05: 42
          +1
          They are haunted by a third of Russia's world resources.
          The pathological greed that pushed them to the unprecedented genocide of tens of millions of Native Americans in history is now moving this flock of undead towards us.
  40. SCHWERIN
    SCHWERIN 11 March 2018 10: 12
    +1
    Both we and the West think in WWII categories. In the modern world, war (full-scale) is not needed. The threat (just a threat) of a nuclear strike cools hotheads on all continents.
    Can you imagine that the enemy’s KR (at least one!) Fell in the center of the metropolis? Panic, collapse of everything. When there are accidents on the roads, in the energy supply and water supply systems, the phones of the Ministry of Emergency Situations and city services become heated. For some citizens, this is the end of the world. And what will happen in the event of a full-blown strike of the Kyrgyz Republic or God forbid the use of nuclear weapons? Indeed, now, unlike the 40s, people can’t be taken to Tashkent in advance! And no matter where it happens in Russia or in the USA. Nuclear weapons are the end of civilization. Everything will change 100%.
    Effects? Watch The Walking Dead. Something like that. Who wants such a life? I think no one.
    And the same West does not want. Understands its "elite" consequences. Even those who reserved a place in government bunkers. Spend the day on the subway. You’ll immediately understand how it feels to live there. Why all my life I have been chasing loot, mansions, super cars? It will not be necessary.
    Spin NATO, on the lands of the Baltic gnomes arrange shooting games, maneuvers. And attack b .... t! But the gnome-limotrophs are happy. We are now under Uncle Sam’s armpit. Fools ... Yes, there are dill.
    East Wall .... Three years already holding back.
    Sanctions did not ride. Of course there is an effect, but not the one we were counting on. That frolic, breed the above suckers.
    Part of our population is mocking on the message of GDP and cartoon pictures. Gentlemen, comrades, this is called the HYBRID WAR. Hollywood has been pouring cartoons into your heads for decades and you were fooled. Lost in the 90s. Well, people. Gorbi and his entourage also led. Well, Gorby, he's in chocolate. And in what kind of "chocolate" did the people of the USSR end up? I think it’s clear.
    And then it went. Yugi, Middle East. Pomegranate, apple, orange, rose revolution and others. For a penny, the West (USA) has ruined half the world! I’m silent about the non-brothers.
    How we crawled out from under it. Only miraculously can be explained.
  41. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 11 March 2018 13: 44
    +5
    Having a powerful weapon, it is also necessary to have a powerful economy, power in the person of the first persons of the state completely failed domestic policy. A socially just state has not been created, the simple, SIMPLE Citizen of Russia is not provided with physical, economic, social, criminal procedural security, which has led to inequality, a colossal difference between rich and poor, reaching a proportion of hundreds, and in some sectors, thousands of times, example, the salary of the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation is 1760000 rubles a month, the salary of a simple financial specialist in any rural area is 15000 rubles, 1760000: 15000 = 117,33. And what our minister did good for the growth of well-being of a simple Russian, nothing. Until tough order is established in the country, especially in the so-called "elite", of officials of all ranks, we will not achieve anything and all these calls by top officials will be buried just like the May 2012 presidential decrees. Look at the performance of GDP in September 2011 at the congress edr ... which programs were announced and which of them were implemented, but nothing. As long as the power will be for himself and for a handful, and not for the whole PEOPLE, all that is said to the federal assembly is Pshik.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 11 March 2018 20: 36
      +4
      Did he say anything about the people there? laughing
  42. high
    high 12 March 2018 00: 43
    +2
    US Secretary of Defense Mattis:
    ,, I watched the clips that Putin showed and did not see any changes in the equipment of the Russian armed forces, each of the systems that Putin spoke about still requires many years of refinement, so they will not affect the military balance of forces. We do not need to change the deterrence strategy because of them. ,,
    1. cedar
      cedar 12 March 2018 05: 35
      +1
      A fresh American joke of the day - "I watched the clips that Putin showed and did not see ..."
      The nearest time will show who looked ...
  43. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 12 March 2018 09: 32
    +2
    Alexander, do you yourself believe in your conclusions? smile There is no question of any lifting of sanctions or easing pressure on Russia even in the foreseeable future! It is a pity that the Russian government flesh from the flesh of the West does not understand this! Rather, she understands, but her roles as vassals suit.
  44. kig
    kig 13 March 2018 06: 33
    0
    With a kind word and a gun ... mind you, the word comes first.