Military Review

Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia

190
The chairman of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces, General John Gaiten, said that American submarines "are capable of destroying Russia if they make such a decision."


Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia


He stated this during the budget hearings in the House Committee on Armed Forces on Wednesday, Voice of America reports.

They (the Russians) cannot do anything except a massive attack against our country, to which we could not respond. By the way, they do not know where our submarines are located, and they are capable of destroying their country if we take this course.
- he added.

We are ready for all threats, and no one should doubt it
- noted Heiten.

In the new "National Defense Strategy" of the USA, the Pentagon called China, Russia, the DPRK and Iran the main threats to American security. It is noted that the most significant threat to the States is nuclear weapon Russia. Washington also accused Moscow of financing "destabilization of cyberspace."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
190 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prapor75m
    prapor75m 9 March 2018 13: 50
    +24
    They are ready and we are ready, engaged in complacency wink
    1. Monos
      Monos 9 March 2018 13: 53
      +30
      We are ready for all threats, and no one should doubt it

      Usually when they say "Believe me" or "No one should not doubt it. ", that means they want you on ... well, let it be fooled. smile
      1. Cutter
        Cutter 9 March 2018 14: 05
        +29
        Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia

        Of course they can ... But nothing will remain of the states! Even if you stupidly compare the territory of Russia and the states, the Russian will be where to start a new life ... yes
        1. Crowe
          Crowe 9 March 2018 14: 17
          +22
          Quote: Cutter
          Russian will be where to start a new life ...

          Nuclear winter will be very difficult to live. Everywhere! Even in Africa there will be a cudgel.
          This is not optimism, but stupid naivety.
          1. Cutter
            Cutter 9 March 2018 14: 28
            +35
            This is not optimism, but stupid naivety.

            Of course, I agree with you, but if the Chairman of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command General (!) Claims such stupidity in the House of Representatives (!):
            They (Russians) can do nothing but a massive attack against our country, which we could not respond. By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located, and they are able to destroy their country if we take this course

            what you already want from me, a modest Soviet reserve officer! So I do not need "optimism with silly naivety", but the American general ...
            hi
            1. ARES623
              ARES623 9 March 2018 23: 28
              +2
              Quote: Cutter
              but if the Chairman of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command General (!) claims such stupidity in the House of Representatives (!):

              The general, of course, is an optimist. In this report, however, he forgot to add that if Congress decides to use the opportunity voiced by the general, this will be the last report in the House. Because the House, the entire congress, the administration of the President of the United States and the entire east coast will turn into a zone of increased radiation to a considerable depth, incompatible with the life of cockroaches. And the crews of the submarines will have no one to return to. As our President said: "Why do we need a world in which Russia will not be?"
          2. Sirocco
            Sirocco 9 March 2018 14: 43
            +23
            Quote: Crowe
            Nuclear winter will be very difficult to live.

            I suppose, at the expense of nuclear winter, this is a bluff for scientists to arrange this scenario. I think we need the entire stock of nuclear weapons throughout the ball, and not local blows in the KLT, here we need MHT.
            Now on the topic, we are of the same opinion and we are in the HE in relation to the United States. Only there is one BUT, Russia is not Libya, Syria, Iraq. Gun rollback can even tear your head away from such success among those who want to try.
            1. max702
              max702 10 March 2018 12: 00
              +1
              Quote: Sirocco
              I guess on a nuclear winter’s account it’s a bluff for scientists,

              I hereby advise everyone who wrote about the bluff of a nuclear winter once again to think WHERE nuclear weapons strikes will be delivered .. Europe will just have one hit on the blocks of the Zaporizhzhya NPP, Siberia one hit on the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP, the same facilities will be found in the Urals as in the far in the east, the same applies to the United States and the entire American continent .. Even if there is no ecological disaster, there will be a global technological one, the world will at best roll back to the age of iron and steam, but in reality even further, figure out what will happen in 50-100 years the field of such a conflict ... The most important question is who and how will restore everything that has been destroyed? Who are these people, and where will they get the resources to rebuild civilization? Let me remind you of the consequences of the explosion of ONE Chernobyl reactor that could not be properly eliminated by the most powerful country at its peak .. But then there will be orders of magnitude greater. So whether there will be a nuclear winter or not, it’s not enough for civilization to get civilization after exchanging nuclear weapons strikes ..
          3. Chaos
            Chaos 9 March 2018 15: 00
            +13
            Someone once blurted out about the nuclear winter. Everyone believed it. There will be no nuclear winter. Myth is everything.
            1. onix757
              onix757 9 March 2018 15: 05
              +2
              Quote: Chaos
              Someone once blurted out about the nuclear winter. Everyone believed it. There will be no nuclear winter. Myth is everything.

              I think that this theory was put forward at a time when each side possessed several thousand deployed carriers.
            2. Bongo
              Bongo 9 March 2018 15: 40
              +3
              Quote: Chaos
              Someone once blurted out about the nuclear winter. Everyone believed it. There will be no nuclear winter. Myth is everything.

              Nuclear fears (clickable) hi
            3. DMB_95
              DMB_95 9 March 2018 18: 02
              +1
              Quote: Chaos
              Someone once blurted out about a nuclear winter. Everyone believed. There will be no nuclear winter ..

              Most likely, after a large-scale exchange of nuclear strikes it will be even worse than during a nuclear winter.
          4. SPACE
            SPACE 9 March 2018 15: 37
            +8
            Quote: Crowe
            Nuclear winter will be very difficult to live. Everywhere! Even in Africa there will be a cudgel.

            Dubak, our home is native.
          5. poquello
            poquello 9 March 2018 16: 03
            +5
            Quote: Crowe
            Nuclear winter will be very difficult to live. Everywhere!

          6. dvina71
            dvina71 9 March 2018 17: 31
            +2
            Quote: Crowe
            Nuclear winter

            Nuclear winter is nonsense. The Second World War did not cause any disasters, but entire cities and countries burned there.
          7. lis-ik
            lis-ik 9 March 2018 18: 06
            +2
            Quote: Crowe
            Quote: Cutter
            Russian will be where to start a new life ...

            Nuclear winter will be very difficult to live. Everywhere! Even in Africa there will be a cudgel.
            This is not optimism, but stupid naivety.

            Where does such confidence about nuclear winter come from? It seems to me that this is greatly exaggerated by the guardians of nature. And by that time, it’s time to be the first to groan, besides having such a “head start” in the form of nishtyaks voiced by the president. All the same, a great war cannot be avoided. And he himself said, "you have to beat first."
          8. alexddd
            alexddd 9 March 2018 22: 08
            +5
            Nuclear winter is a myth of the Cold War era. Volcanoes annually emit much more than anything into the atmosphere, but there is no winter, or rather there is ordinary winter. Google the power of volcanic eruptions and compare with thermonuclear explosions. I remember one old scientist on TV laughed at the presenter’s statement that they would soon cut down all the forests. Roughly said this, even if the whole world starts sawing, all the same, the forests will have time to recover, a person takes a lot on himself, arguing about his greatness, like look at a map of Russia - in 70% of the forests a person’s foot has not set foot. I looked at the map of Russia after that and really shocked the territory of my homeland. By the way, look at the information on the description of the explosion of the "Kuzkin Mother" 50 megatons on Novaya Zemlya. Physicists with instruments were at the epicenter of the explosion after 2 hours after the explosion, the radiation background was normal. A person who has studied physics little at school knows that the reaction of thermonuclear fusion of deuterium and tritium (a modern thermonuclear warhead) does not produce such destructive radiation as plutonium nuclear charges. Therefore, the winner in the war may be bad, as everyone will try to get ahead of the opponent with the first shot. By the way, the American military institute conducted a computer simulation of nuclear war, and so they got a disappointing result for themselves - the United States will not be able to restore economic activity on its territory, due to crowding of industrial enterprises and populated agglomerations in tight territories, mainly on coasts, because invaders from ships settled colonies from the coast (the Indians will be alive on their reserves), Russia, due to the uneven population density and vast territory, will completely restore industry and agriculture within 20-40 years. Americans are bluff masters. The fact that they were engaged in the modernization of free-falling nuclear bombs may indicate an almost completely destroyed missile shield and sword. Remember Britain’s tests of launching a nuclear missile from a submarine several years ago, when the missile went completely wrong, analyze why rocket engines are still being bought from us, look up the clown Elon Mask, this is an illusionist, ahahahaha! 99 percent that their missiles will not fly anywhere and Putin knows this and they understand that Putin knows, and Putin realized that they understood that he knows. It remains for the rest to understand, oh yes, Eun understood the same. Comedy awaits us, when the Americans will try to bluff the inflated turkeys and shrink Putin’s new arms limitation treaties. But our Vladimirych is smart and will take advantage of the opportunity to maximize dividends from the elite.
            1. Mih1974
              Mih1974 10 March 2018 05: 32
              +2
              I’ll add a little: America, to the breathtakingly “automated”, that an elementary shutdown of electricity will be for them equivalent to a vigorous bombing. I'm not joking, recently there was a message in Naglia (less computerized) due to a change in supplier, an entire trading network like our “magnet” was left with empty shelves - they just bought everything and did not bring in a new one. Imagine what will happen to the United States when you turn off the Internet, refrigerators, cut off food supplies, what can I say - they almost forgot what cash is !!! fool .Even if there are goods - they will not be able to buy them if there is no cash, and stores will not be able to sell without breaking checks !!! negative There the wild Achtung will begin, remember that the atm was in New Orleans? And then if the whole country is in such a mess - yes, there the country will fall apart into small pieces controlled by gangs and the "feral" military. By the way, I want to remind you that, unlike Russia, the United States has more than 100 nuclear reactors !! belay You remind Fokushima, and there were no attacks by cruise missiles, "only" the supply of cooling water stopped !!! Believe it will be STO Focus negative . And these are not “pure” thermonuclear explosions, there will be just a scattering of scraps of uranium fuel, those systems (with no less luminosity, etc. a la Chernobyl. Moreover, in Russia only a couple of regions are a bit of a national strain, but here in the USA - read every city "small Middle East". No. negative With all that it implies.
              In Russia, all the "cops" to each other "cops")), and in the United States, each city is like its own country. This is the story of the former "policeman" who served 18 years in Oklahoma, and it is not for nothing that they often "beat" this in their films.
              If in Russia during cataclysms there will be "unity of people" in helping each other, then in the USA, which has happened more than once in history, there comes complete anarchy and "hell on earth."
              1. siemens7774
                siemens7774 10 March 2018 17: 19
                0
                Mih1974, I was in New Orleans during Catherine. So it was. As long as the National Guard and the army did not take control of the entire okrug. They even called their snipers from Europe, who shot almost 673 Moroders.
          9. NKT
            NKT 9 March 2018 22: 19
            0
            There will be no nuclear winter, but it will be the other way around, as in a stove.
            66 million years ago it was, 3/4 of all species died. The explosion was a force of 100 million MT
            1. Chaos
              Chaos 10 March 2018 07: 21
              +2
              Excuse me, did you live 66 million years ago? Tell me what was there? flora, fauna, weather more bully
              1. Clumsy
                Clumsy 10 March 2018 08: 05
                +1
                RenTV to help you))) there are almost documentary shots)))
              2. NKT
                NKT 10 March 2018 14: 34
                +1
                Why is it necessary to live? The end of the Cretaceous period is clearly traced by the geological layer. It is enough to take core or rock samples and carry out analyzes. From there you can find out what atmosphere was then. There are such sciences - geology and paleontology, which are engaged in this.
                This layer, which can be traced everywhere, is the time of the impact of the asteroid.
          10. 2С5
            2С5 10 March 2018 06: 20
            +1
            ... well, it’s something we don’t get used to winter))) And judging by the ecological situation, at least in our Krasnoyarsk, the nuclear winter is not much different from ours laughing
        2. Shura Sailors
          Shura Sailors 9 March 2018 14: 23
          +7
          Maybe ... And the United States, and Russia, and China (and there is also India, Great Britain, brother Eun and others like them). Are pipettes measured again? Like small children, by golly
          1. sgazeev
            sgazeev 9 March 2018 18: 25
            0
            Quote: Shura sailors
            Maybe ... And the United States, and Russia, and China (and there is also India, Great Britain, brother Eun and others like them). Are pipettes measured again? Like small children, by golly

            United Kingdom leases missiles from the United States, the last launch showed .... and she ... turned to the owner. wassat
        3. sgazeev
          sgazeev 9 March 2018 14: 48
          +2
          Quote: Cutter
          Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia

          Of course they can ... But nothing will remain of the states! Even if you stupidly compare the territory of Russia and the states, the Russian will be where to start a new life ... yes
        4. Serge Gorely
          Serge Gorely 10 March 2018 14: 11
          +1
          After the exchange of nuclear "greetings" between the US and Russia, only rats and cockroaches will start a new life ...
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 9 March 2018 14: 16
        +11
        Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia

        Maybe, but you know our answer too? "Dead Hand System ..? Is there such, although with new developments, your missiles are likely to be able to return back ..)))
        Russian EW also does not stand still and you know it gentlemen! soldier it would be better if we talk heart to heart and we will return ALL money to thieves together! soldier
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Korax71
            Korax71 9 March 2018 15: 30
            +12
            Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Our fucks up! Our local politician !!! lowering offending him. He could go on the attack.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 9 March 2018 16: 42
              +5
              Not our local marshal for victory.
            2. Curious
              Curious 10 March 2018 02: 04
              +6
              "... he can follow him up to attack."
              Attack, as I understand it, will be the nearest wineglass?
              1. Korax71
                Korax71 10 March 2018 10: 50
                +2
                Two fronts. Another and take a cheburechny wink
          2. B.T.V.
            B.T.V. 9 March 2018 15: 40
            +13
            Quote: Galaxy
            Although Trump is likely to mow the audience under an idiot, and you're natural!


            And an insult from what: from “beyond the mind” or lack of education ?!
            1. Stanislas
              Stanislas 10 March 2018 08: 28
              +1
              Quote: B.T.W.
              And an insult from what
              From the fact that MIKHAN is still in the ranks, he senses the enemy over a mile away and knows how to raise the morale of fighters.
          3. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 9 March 2018 17: 09
            +7
            Quote: Galaxy
            You can’t read Mikhan without tears,

            I agree.. crying I’m afraid of myself sometimes .. wassat
            I understood your malice very well .. heh heh
            Quote: Galaxy
            Although Trump is likely to mow the audience under an idiot, and you're natural!

            I remember that ...
          4. 72jora72
            72jora72 9 March 2018 17: 26
            +4
            Although Trump is likely to mow the audience under an idiot, and you're natural!
            Rude is not necessary ......
            1. ZVO
              ZVO 10 March 2018 17: 44
              +2
              Quote: 72jora72
              Although Trump is likely to mow the audience under an idiot, and you're natural!
              Rude is not necessary ......


              And here is rudeness? if this Mikhan had been read in the last 3-4 years, by different nicknames, you understand that Mikhan is natural. Its when banned again. after 3 days, a new nickname will appear - which will again prove to be the same again within a week - naturally!
              1. The comment was deleted.
      3. ancestors from Don
        ancestors from Don 9 March 2018 15: 39
        +3
        About the "invisibility" of Amer’s submarines))), only Russian nuclear submarines can simultaneously launch multiple missiles on board from an underwater position, no one else in the world can repeat this.
        1. alex86
          alex86 9 March 2018 17: 16
          +7
          Quote: ancestors from the Don
          simultaneous salvo of missiles on board from underwater

          for accuracy - all the same, not simultaneous, but sequential (if I may say so)
          And about invisibility - unfortunately, the combat patrol zone for them is the entire oceans, and we will not track them
        2. ZVO
          ZVO 12 March 2018 19: 13
          0
          Quote: Ancestors from the Don
          no one else in the world can repeat this.


          If they didn’t do it specifically for you, you don’t have to think that this is impossible in principle ...
    2. Dimontius
      Dimontius 9 March 2018 13: 54
      +16
      except for a massive attack against our country, which we could not answer

      So we don’t need that anymore. fellow Yes, and about our submarines somehow forgot something, against the backdrop of new weapons. And they are! but that's where they’re the big question repeat Anyway, there is no better place for such attacks than hearings in the budget committee laughing
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 10 March 2018 05: 35
        0
        And to our submarines - to the button their location, in case of an order, they will launch missiles right from the pier. good . That incidentally, once checked - flew to the cheats glass in dozens of houses, but the order - carried out. soldier good
    3. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 9 March 2018 13: 58
      +9
      Their fleet is certainly not weak, but Russia also has something to answer all the more now angry .
      So at the expense of who will destroy whom, I think Amers should not overestimate themselves No. .
      1. 2С5
        2С5 10 March 2018 06: 23
        0
        ... Danunafik! They are like in that joke ... they are standing in front of the mirror and you are * in front of yourself ...
    4. 210ox
      210ox 9 March 2018 14: 01
      +5
      “By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located, and they are capable of destroying their country if we take this course.” And you, fenders, know where our submarines are?
      Quote: prapor75m
      They are ready and we are ready, engaged in complacency wink
      1. Deck
        Deck 9 March 2018 17: 11
        +3
        Do you, fenders, know where our submarines are?


        If they read VO, then they know that mainly at the wall or under repair https://topwar.ru/132156-voennyy-flot-rossii-grus
        tnyy-vzglyad-v-buduschee.html
        1. SEER
          SEER 9 March 2018 23: 29
          0
          Quote: Deck
          If they read VO, then they know that mainly at the wall or under repair https://topwar.ru/132156-voennyy-flot-rossii-grus
          tnyy-vzglyad-v-buduschee.html

          I understand you that our boats can’t shoot from the wall?
          1. alex86
            alex86 10 March 2018 09: 24
            +2
            Since we assume that we are not the first to strike (though, after Putin’s speech, we are no longer sure), it’s very likely that they won’t have time to shoot from the wall - the coordinates are known, cruise missiles and saving - the walls are close to each other, one ammunition - several submarines
      2. The comment was deleted.
    5. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 9 March 2018 14: 06
      +7
      "General John Geithen, chairman of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command, said US submarines" can destroy Russia if they make that decision. "
      Nonsense American and so visible to anyone and without the statement of his highest military
      Or is he spitting without a piece of paper?
      Interestingly THEY undergo a mental examination ??
      1. alex86
        alex86 10 March 2018 09: 27
        +1
        Is it you who subtly troll our President?
        Quote: To be or not to be
        Interestingly THEY undergo a mental examination ??

        After HIS speech, the majority raises precisely this question ...
    6. poquello
      poquello 9 March 2018 15: 54
      0
      Quote: prapor75m
      They are ready and we are ready, engaged in complacency wink

      ett he's so joking, a little dumb but funny
    7. Maz
      Maz 9 March 2018 16: 53
      +3
      The 24th “bestial” submarine division, nicknamed for the names of the submarines - “Wolf”, “Boar”, “Cheetah”, “Leopard”, “Panther”, “Tiger” ... The panther has a snack on the emblem of this division in half an American Ohio class submarine. And not just on the emblem a black night cat, the queen of darkness, nibbles the American SSBN ...
    8. drunkram
      drunkram 9 March 2018 19: 39
      +7
      How many caps in the comments, and no one is commenting on the case. ah ah, the flood room
      1. Chaos
        Chaos 9 March 2018 21: 00
        +1
        And you’ve commented on the topic right now, right in the center of the article laughing
        1. drunkram
          drunkram 10 March 2018 15: 13
          0
          I'm not flooding)
  2. svp67
    svp67 9 March 2018 13: 50
    +12
    The chairman of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces, General John Gaiten, said that American submarines "are capable of destroying Russia if they make such a decision."
    So Russia has its own submarines, including unmanned ones ... But this is not the main thing. They deliberately DO NOT WANT to hear us. Our President clearly stated that:
    - Russia's strike will be RESPONSE
    - WE DO NOT NEED THE EARTHWIDE WITHOUT RUSSIA.
    It’s time in the USA to get from the storerooms and revisit the film “The Next Day”, maybe then they’ll
    1. Masya masya
      Masya masya 9 March 2018 13: 56
      +8
      Quote: svp67
      They deliberately DO NOT WANT to hear us.

      so they don’t know how to wash their ears ... wink
    2. 210ox
      210ox 9 March 2018 14: 03
      +2
      A very serious film with a shitty end .. There, by the way, the artist from the "Police Academy" starred ..
      Quote: svp67
      The chairman of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces, General John Gaiten, said that American submarines "are capable of destroying Russia if they make such a decision."
      So Russia has its own submarines, including unmanned ones ... But this is not the main thing. They deliberately DO NOT WANT to hear us. Our President clearly stated that:
      - Russia's strike will be RESPONSE
      - WE DO NOT NEED THE EARTHWIDE WITHOUT RUSSIA.
      It’s time in the USA to get from the storerooms and revisit the film “The Next Day”, maybe then they’ll
    3. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 9 March 2018 14: 19
      +9
      svp67 "- Russia's strike will be RESPONSE"
      With that new system for detecting a nuclear missile attack that was made in Russia, no doubt, in the case of a missile attack from any direction, the strike will be retaliated-INTERCEPT ....
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 10 March 2018 07: 27
        0
        Actually, there is one troubled moment with nuclear weapons - in the USSR / Russia and the USA, the military and specialists gave an "expiration date" (do not laugh) of only 30 years. In the United States, the enrichment industry (nuclear) has become a stake for several decades. So whether they make new warheads or not, only Allah knows.
        For a very long time in the United States, "physical nuclear explosions" were not carried out, only mathematical calculations, so the United States has "working" warheads or not, "this is not known to science" as about life on Mars. lol
        But for Russia I’m calm - about 6-9 years ago, we carried out "subcritical" physical explosions. These are such umm "small" explosions, even though nuclear, but somehow not prohibited by the "ban on nuclear explosions." How is it - xs, but something else is important here, the mattresses didn’t do anything similar in their response. So even if their ancient minutemans take off and reach us, they are far from a fact that they “bang”, it is likely that they will simply collapse with a piece of “cast iron” in the region of the blast point. repeat
        1. bk316
          bk316 10 March 2018 12: 03
          +1
          experts gave an "expiration date" (

          So missiles extended time more than once. It is with us in 5-7 years ALL ICBMs will be new. And in the USA it’s still old, but how many blocks do not change how many controllers do not reflash the product still aging.
  3. Selendis
    Selendis 9 March 2018 13: 51
    +3
    Lord, for so many years now they have been wrinkling muscles instead of brains, but what's the point ...
  4. tchoni
    tchoni 9 March 2018 13: 53
    +2
    Yeah ... Herr Hayten discovered America (or Armenika .... or Armenia ... maybe lost ...)
    Let's tie him with this! (possible in chorus)
    This is not news since the late sixties ....
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 9 March 2018 13: 54
    +15
    oh how menacingly cheeks puffs! like he knows where ours go ... laughing
    wink
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 10 March 2018 07: 29
        0
        For those who are stubborn, Russian nuclear submarines can (tested) launch ballistic missiles directly moored to the pier. This does not interfere with their main task in any way.
        1. alex86
          alex86 10 March 2018 09: 30
          0
          Quote: Mih1974
          For people like you stubborn
          - if they manage to do it
  6. Runoway
    Runoway 9 March 2018 13: 55
    +7
    If they could at all, they would have attacked for a long time, but for now alas for them
  7. razved
    razved 9 March 2018 13: 56
    +10
    Judging by the statements of the Amers, the more carefully they study the message of March 1 of this year and the more aware of it, the stronger their hysteria.
    1. Dashout
      Dashout 9 March 2018 14: 49
      +4
      There is such a thing ... until it reaches the length of the neck ...
  8. bubalik
    bubalik 9 March 2018 13: 57
    +1
    He stated this during a budget hearing.

    ,,, the draft budget for the 2019 year provides for the allocation of additional 24 billion dollars to support and modernize nuclear forces.

    Putin said earlier that in response to the development of a missile defense system in the United States, Russia will adopt a new nuclear missile. According to him, information about the latest unique Russian weapons, which no one has in the world, is not a bluff.
  9. izya top
    izya top 9 March 2018 13: 57
    +4
    and why didn’t they even ask for money? belay
    1. evil partisan
      evil partisan 9 March 2018 16: 07
      +2
      Quote: izya top
      and why didn’t they even ask for money?

      You’ll interrogate how! sad
      Hi greed! drinks
      1. izya top
        izya top 9 March 2018 16: 10
        +5
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        Hi greed

        don't be protoucr No. you owe me one hundred shekels for moral damage
        1. evil partisan
          evil partisan 9 March 2018 16: 14
          +2
          First return 100 shekels!
          And then we'll talk about the damage ... smile
          1. izya top
            izya top 9 March 2018 16: 20
            +5
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            And then we'll talk about the damage.

            no, Shmulik, you are definitely a sumer belay
  10. Sergey D_2
    Sergey D_2 9 March 2018 14: 00
    +5
    Man - there is a microbe on the body of the Earth, vile and greedy (Saint-Jean Perseus)
  11. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 9 March 2018 14: 03
    +6
    Well, you scare them. They are you. That's how you live fun.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. dauria
      dauria 9 March 2018 14: 27
      +10
      Well, you scare them. They are you. That's how you live fun.


      Aren't you scared? wink We are accustomed, but you do not all come from the USSR. Moreover, the most offensive to you - Armageddon can start without asking Israel. laughing
      1. Diver d
        Diver d 9 March 2018 15: 18
        +3
        Do not worry about Israel) Here, during the shelling, the cafes were packed, at least in the beginning, and even after that they did not close. And you know, it was not the local population who had the most panic, but those who arrived. The locals are already familiar, there was not yet a generation here that would not have fought or grew up without wars. There was no panic before, but now there will be no more. Really scared, so much so that instead of sheltering, they go to look at how rockets are intercepted, a wonderful sight, more mesmerizing than a salute) However, it gathers no less than spectators)
    3. Maz
      Maz 9 March 2018 15: 40
      +4
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Well, you scare them. They are you. That's how you live fun.

      You have already been intimidated - no activity in Syria. Hezbollah opened its mouth. They scare you, you scare them. Everything is parallel. The difference in volume and danger. Your mouse fuss does not threaten anyone but you. And if our boats start to bullet American ones, then everyone will have to smell the forelock.
  12. askme
    askme 9 March 2018 14: 05
    +9
    From a psychological point of view, this is a pure act of aggression. Russia does not declare the destruction of the United States at all official levels. Yankees do this from hysteria. They are losers. What are recognized regularly. Officially))
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 9 March 2018 17: 28
      +1
      Quote: askme
      From a psychological point of view, this is a pure act of aggression. Russia does not declare the destruction of the United States at all official levels. Yankees do this from hysteria. They are losers. What are recognized regularly. Officially))

      didn't declare? Are you sure? A recent cartoon with a rocket that is pointing to the American coast then what?
      1. askme
        askme 9 March 2018 17: 36
        +4
        This is a Rorschach test. That is, only people with special imagination (sick) can fantasize themselves that through the cartoon Russia is officially threatening to destroy the American coast. In contrast to the absolutely unequivocal statement of this American official bastard with epaulettes, directly threatening to do so. And he is far from the first. Russia has never officially allowed itself such a thing. The difference is obvious. For sane ...
        1. smoooggg
          smoooggg 9 March 2018 22: 28
          0
          > Russia has never officially allowed such a thing.

          why do you first comment, and not read a textbook on the history of the Russian Federation?
      2. SEER
        SEER 9 March 2018 23: 36
        0
        Quote: MadCat

        didn't declare? Are you sure? A recent cartoon with a rocket that is pointing to the American coast then what?

        show yes? really want to see it
        1. MadCat
          MadCat 10 March 2018 02: 28
          +1
          27 ° 54'40.10 "N
          81 ° 39'39.14 "W
      3. Stanislas
        Stanislas 10 March 2018 09: 08
        +1
        Quote: MadCat
        didn't declare? Are you sure? A recent cartoon with a rocket
        The cartoon is not an act of aggression, but an invitation to negotiations: there is nothing about the destruction of the United States, but about the futility of their missile defense and the need to negotiate with us. Although, if cat mad, then it is said, for a long time.
  13. Operator
    Operator 9 March 2018 14: 06
    +5
    The head of the US Strategic Command divulged military secrets: as a measure of military influence on Russia, America can only rely on its offensive weapons, missile defense is a bluff.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Operator
        Operator 9 March 2018 22: 41
        0
        Strategic Nuclear Forces are directed, but missile defense is not, and most importantly, you firmly believe in this laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Bouncer
    Bouncer 9 March 2018 14: 07
    +19
    And Russian boats can destroy the United States
  15. AlexVas44
    AlexVas44 9 March 2018 14: 07
    +4
    By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located,

    If this is said by the chairman of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces, then it is worth thinking about his strategic horizons. Is it in its place? Maybe tired, it's time to stock, retirement? Or is it scary to even think in a psychiatric hospital? laughing laughing tongue laughing laughing
  16. Herculesic
    Herculesic 9 March 2018 14: 09
    +7
    It seems that the world has turned upside down, after Putin’s speech on March 1, the Yankees have definitely lost ground, and now they are trying by self-deception to prove first of all to themselves their omnipotence and invulnerability.
    1. drunkram
      drunkram 9 March 2018 19: 34
      +4
      It’s just that they have an underwater fleet no worse than ours and surface and underwater combined, the number of carriers of the Kyrgyz Republic is many times greater, the number of nuclear submarines is such that the Russian Navy did not even dream of and will not be in the next 30-50 years, with the number of modern torpedoes and anti-submarine vehicles The Russian Federation is not particularly in order, the outdated anti-submarine aircraft fleet, tired minesweepers and a whole bunch of problems can be forgotten offhand, you can’t throw hats here anymore. So here is more likely a hint - do not meddle in trouble, bears.
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 10 March 2018 07: 35
        0
        Yes, yes - "they have longer" submarine fleet, "AND WHAT?" tongue We and mine missiles and those that are waiting at the pier for the eyes will be enough to make the film "the next day" a reality. How will the "length" of the fleet help America? fool What will they die from the "poplars" more pleasant?
        1. drunkram
          drunkram 10 March 2018 15: 15
          0
          I doubt that someone from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has the courage to put poplar or two towards the USA, if they suddenly decide to sink a couple of our ships somewhere in disputed areas or far from their homeland. A strong one who has a fleet should not rely on nuclear weapons, they can hide behind - yes, but don’t cloud over, it will hurt to fall.
  17. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 9 March 2018 14: 11
    +16
    Well, there have come sensible discussions about a guaranteed answer, calls for negotiations, hysterical screeches about the impossibility of "Russian" developments .... good . You look and get back to the normal dialogue .. And then "I will win everyone", "gas station" and others "to shreds" ... That's what the life-giving cross does ... laughing
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 9 March 2018 17: 29
      0
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      Well, there have come sensible discussions about a guaranteed answer, calls for negotiations, hysterical screeches about the impossibility of "Russian" developments ....

      the journalists asked them and answered, you want to say lied?
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 9 March 2018 18: 45
        +4
        They were asked, they answered, didn’t lie in anything. laughing And what ?
      2. SEER
        SEER 9 March 2018 23: 40
        0
        Quote: MadCat

        the journalists asked them and answered, you want to say lied?

        Yes! and as usual.
  18. Doliva63
    Doliva63 9 March 2018 14: 15
    +9
    "They (the Russians) can do nothing but a massive attack against our country, which we could not answer ..."
    This is enough for us drinks Yes, and you too drinks
    1. Mih1974
      Mih1974 10 March 2018 07: 38
      0
      If I read the delirium of the mattress general right, Russia will detect a massive missile attack because we will respond to it and therefore we will destroy Russia with the nuclear submarines with impunity !! belay No. fool
      God, how are they allowed to give orders that could lead to a nuclear war to destroy?
  19. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 9 March 2018 14: 16
    +5
    Quote: from article
    By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located, and they are capable of destroying their country if we take this course, he added (General John Geithen)

    But we (Russia) know where the United States is located and where the children of General John Gaiten live ...
    1. Mih1974
      Mih1974 10 March 2018 07: 40
      +1
      Well, why so meticulous, just the beginning of your post
      But we (Russia) know where the United States is located
      This is more than enough for the Strategic Missile Forces good . Vet still trifles about something there in Matrsia "to heal". laughing
  20. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 9 March 2018 14: 19
    +2
    So no one doubted that. But when we announce the creation of anti-ballistic weapons - this will be a decisive advantage laughing
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 9 March 2018 17: 31
      +2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      So no one doubted that. But when we announce the creation of anti-ballistic weapons - this will be a decisive advantage laughing

      Against the number of rockets that Americans have, the navel will tear about raising. Do not tell tales.
      1. SEER
        SEER 9 March 2018 23: 46
        +1
        Quote: MadCat

        Against the number of rockets that Americans have, the navel will tear about raising. Do not tell tales.

        Is your surname not andersen? change flag, gasket. on all issues you are for the "probable". and it's not about earflaps.
        Now I’m historically watching a movie about Iron Maiden, which is very instructive.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  21. emwave
    emwave 9 March 2018 14: 20
    +3
    Lord, have you made a discovery ?!
    We can destroy each other many times, and in one whole world ...
  22. HAM
    HAM 9 March 2018 14: 22
    +2
    Well, as the boys “boast” and “measure” things. It’s only annoying: the “boys” are old and, as it turned out, without brains, and “toys” can ruin everything. You’ve been intimidated so much that he already “can’t eat”. They took us, ushlopki ..
  23. Dormidont
    Dormidont 9 March 2018 14: 23
    +3
    Well yes. We saw this. "I am the most charming and attractive ..." Self-hypnosis is called
  24. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 9 March 2018 14: 23
    +8
    Already tired of their warlike squeals ... Here it is real, a mob of rabble from bandits, slaves and traitors is trying in the classical traditions of the gopot to threaten the whole world. Disposal trash ...
  25. Separ
    Separ 9 March 2018 14: 30
    +3
    "... American submarines are capable of destroying Russia .." - if they are not inadvertently drowned at distant approaches. am
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 9 March 2018 14: 48
      +6
      And "inadvertently" then assign a star !?
    2. MadCat
      MadCat 9 March 2018 17: 33
      +1
      Quote: Separ
      "... American submarines are capable of destroying Russia .." - if they are not inadvertently drowned at distant approaches. am

      if you’re threatening, then you need to be ready to embody the threat, what are you going to "inadvertently" drown all of the submarines with? do you throw your hats?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 9 March 2018 20: 46
        +2
        To each "inadvertently" a depth bomb in your pocket, a bomb in ... under your arm, a "trawler" with nets in tow !!!
  26. Yak28
    Yak28 9 March 2018 14: 32
    +5
    Russia is a land country, and the US infrastructure is located on the coast, a powerful underwater nuclear explosion will create waves that will wash away all the muck
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 9 March 2018 14: 47
      +2
      Also an option! Dumb all of this, we’d better not fight, we will coast the world!
    2. ved_med12
      ved_med12 9 March 2018 22: 59
      +1
      Plus to you!
      a third of the US population lives on the coast, oceans ... And a third of the Russian population is very close to Europe, which in itself limits the use of nuclear weapons ... in addition, Moscow is covered by an "umbrella"
      Even the purely hypothetical destruction of continental Russia does not mean the immediate death of the submarine fleet, which can wash off at least half of America into the ocean!
  27. armourer
    armourer 9 March 2018 14: 43
    +2
    If porridge begins, China will be afraid to help. For some reason, it’s getting into my head, but maybe I'm wrong
    1. staviator
      staviator 9 March 2018 15: 02
      +1
      IMHO. They will soon go over to their side, nafig them across the ocean when everything is close at hand, along with Mongolia.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 9 March 2018 16: 44
        0
        Who needs this stone Mongolia.
        1. staviator
          staviator 9 March 2018 18: 42
          +1
          Territory however, for example, a landfill or landfill fool
        2. SEER
          SEER 9 March 2018 23: 55
          0
          Quote: Vadim237
          Who needs this stone Mongolia.

          there is so much buried in stones that ....
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 10 March 2018 21: 54
            0
            What is buried - manure?
            1. SEER
              SEER 12 March 2018 13: 07
              0
              Quote: Vadim237
              What is buried - manure?

              disconnected from google?
  28. rocket757
    rocket757 9 March 2018 14: 43
    +2
    If there is nothing to say? So you need to repeat!
    Indeed, why are we surprised / indignant?
  29. Simon
    Simon 9 March 2018 14: 50
    +3
    Of course they can, but only on the map! tongue
  30. Falcond
    Falcond 9 March 2018 14: 57
    +1
    Able and capable .. who would doubt it! ... You could not say it!
    The question is the inevitability of a retaliatory strike ... in any situation - regardless of whether we know where their boats are or not ... these boats will have nowhere to return ...
    And so you can measure dildas as much as you like ...
    1. SEER
      SEER 9 March 2018 23: 56
      0
      Quote: FalconD
      Able and capable .. who would doubt it! ... It was possible not to declare it !.

      stated many times. there were dozens of plans.
      Quote: FalconD
      The question is the inevitability of a retaliatory strike ... in any situation - regardless of whether we know where their boats are or not ... these boats will have nowhere to return ...
      And so you can measure dildas as much as you like ...
  31. Okolotochny
    Okolotochny 9 March 2018 14: 59
    +3
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    Well, you scare them. They are you. That's how you live fun.

    You mixed up. We did not scare, but warned. Do you catch the difference? Compare the combat potentials of NATO and Russia, and then you will not write your heresy about fear. Although you will, captain, mana mana. You became frank Jumshuds among amers.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  32. cradle
    cradle 9 March 2018 14: 59
    0
    Quote: rocket757
    And "inadvertently" then assign a star !?

    bulk stars
  33. Dim Dimych
    Dim Dimych 9 March 2018 15: 02
    +5
    A. Nevsky "God is not in power, but in law"! I will add, for whom it is true, for those the Lord himself, with all the ensuing consequences! And this is evident from current events, including a bloodless operation in the Crimea, an operation to “clean up” Syria and, in general, in the case of a nuclear duel, it may turn out that 50% of the ICBMs do not reach the target, or do not detonate, and the remaining 50 % US nuclear submarines, in the case of the “start” command, abnormal situations will occur (by the time the US statistic had never experienced the simultaneous start of the full ammunition of a nuclear submarine, unlike Russia and Operation Behemoth, where a full 16 kMBU ammunition was launched from the K- 407 “Novomoskovsk”!) I just read somewhere a long time ago that the Pentagon tried to launch several pieces at a time (in my opinion with the Ohio nuclear submarine, when it was still the carrier of ICBMs before the Tomahawks) and the boat immediately literally diverged at the seams! Here you have the praised USA technique! Indeed, why does God need such a world in which Russia will not be ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 March 2018 16: 45
      +1
      Tale no more.
      1. SEER
        SEER 9 March 2018 23: 57
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        Tale no more.

        original however
  34. Puler
    Puler 9 March 2018 15: 06
    +1
    For some reason it seems to me ... that it would be smarter to keep silent to the mum penguin ...
  35. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 9 March 2018 15: 10
    +1
    And when will such "-r-swarms" be put in ward N6 ?! If he wanted to say that he was not at all scared after the appearance of the GDP, then his head at that time was shoved either in the sand, or, worse, between his legs! Ostrich with bulging eyes!
  36. macgyver
    macgyver 9 March 2018 15: 16
    0
    Do they already make submarines a decision? LGBT Submarine Fleet?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 9 March 2018 16: 46
      +1
      Just Chuvachyok fulfills a bonus to the salary no more.
  37. Mirza
    Mirza 9 March 2018 15: 19
    +1
    The ferret hissed, you just look ...
    The bear has no tricks and agility ...
    The bear didn’t spit on cunning and agility!
    There is no need to trick such a figure!
  38. K-50
    K-50 9 March 2018 15: 20
    +2
    General John Geithen, Chairman of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command, said US submarines "are capable of destroying Russia if they make such a decision"

    Who will decide? Boats Crews? The president?
    No one doubted that if you open the mittens and watch the rockets fall on the country, then yes, quite. Only now Russia will resist with all available means, and we have enough funds. yes angry
    From Omerigi there will be only memories, well, a certain number of refugees who will be strangled at the place where they want to hide. It is hoped that citizens of other states who will certainly suffer from American adventures senselessly will not be angry at these refugees, they will hang everyone. yes
  39. Strashila
    Strashila 9 March 2018 15: 25
    +2
    "By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located" ... but we really need it ... ??? our rocket men know geography ... they will not miss.
    1. SPACE
      SPACE 9 March 2018 15: 44
      +1
      Quote: Strashila
      By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located "..

      Something tells us that this is a naive misconception, every atomic submarine of Americans and their allies, every atomic aircraft carrier, shines very brightly on the monitors of the NTsUO.
      1. Strashila
        Strashila 9 March 2018 16: 36
        +3
        The blame for the weight loss program for the US military is to blame, fitness trackers give out the location of the military.
      2. MadCat
        MadCat 9 March 2018 17: 34
        +1
        Quote: SPACE
        Quote: Strashila
        By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located "..

        Something tells us that this is a naive misconception, every atomic submarine of Americans and their allies, every atomic aircraft carrier, shines very brightly on the monitors of the NTsUO.

        I think you just don’t know what you’re talking about.
        1. SEER
          SEER 9 March 2018 23: 59
          0
          Quote: MadCat
          you just don’t know what you are talking about.
          О
          so enlighten, oh know-it-all!
  40. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 9 March 2018 15: 43
    0
    Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia

    Yes eprst. Changed underpants and gaskets ..... repeat Only one categorical condition! :
    - According to all requirements, "green-orange" - "wash shit at the place of origin" repeat
    Well, we will take fines .... but who didn’t have time, alas, he was late.
    And I don’t feel sorry for those. "Dumb head get a feather"
  41. Old26
    Old26 9 March 2018 15: 48
    +1
    How little is needed for you guys to get aroused. Well, he told the senators that the SSBN could destroy Russia. What do you want him to say? The presence of 280 missiles in boats is really enough to destroy Russia as a single state with a central government.
    Surely the same Shoigu says when speaking to the Duma or SF. If there had been no threat of mutual annihilation, the war would have erupted a very long time ago. And here we can destroy each other. What new did he say? Fact is fact. It was the threat of mutual destruction that at one time pushed the USSR and the USA to conclude strategic agreements
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn April 5 2018 23: 25
      0
      Good day, Vladimir! You are absolutely right - boats are being built for this! Like, however, in Russia or China?
  42. poquello
    poquello 9 March 2018 15: 52
    +1
    good humor, I liked who didn’t fall under the table yet, see the shooting of their submarines
  43. Maxim Maksimych Stirlitz
    Maxim Maksimych Stirlitz 9 March 2018 16: 04
    +3
    The US and NATO must be destroyed! The United States is the most important international terrorist in the world. The destruction of the United States is the main condition for the salvation of mankind from the Masonic-globalist enslavement and from the liquid-Satanic enslavement.
    https://youtu.be/vSrXtKrrX8Q
  44. flicker
    flicker 9 March 2018 16: 05
    +4
    Over the course of several years, a missile defense system was launched in Europe from Iran and North Korea, in the last three years, US military equipment has been transferred and continues to be transferred to the borders of Russia, the USA sharply lowers the threshold for deciding whether to launch a nuclear strike (for cyber attacks), classifies us as a threat, and deprives us us flag and anthem at the Olympics, impose fictitious sanctions (if you intend to hit with nuclear weapons, then what are the sanctions?) and all in order to frighten and force to surrender.
    But Putin is reporting a new weapon created in Russia that can nullify Amers’s aggressive intentions. And all these missile defense systems, all this scrap metal (called tanks, etc.), all these attempts are reset to zero.
    Now (after Putin’s message), we hear
    We are ready for all threats, and no one should doubt it

    In the beginning there was a position of a self-confident hunter, now the position is already a game that can snap back.
    The arrogance was quickly knocked down from a Washington hawk.
  45. APASUS
    APASUS 9 March 2018 16: 21
    +1
    Americans are cool specialists, especially in the class for carpet intrigues, but when something went wrong there is a panic, it simply catches the eye:
    Pentagon: US submarines are able to destroy Russia
  46. Berkut24
    Berkut24 9 March 2018 16: 22
    +1
    Of course, we have smaller submarines, well, so the US territory is smaller. Do they want to hear a similar phrase from Putin?
    1. SEER
      SEER 10 March 2018 00: 06
      +1
      Quote: Berkut24
      Of course, we have smaller submarines, well, so the US territory is smaller. Do they want to hear a similar phrase from Putin?

      Putin’s similar phrase will be put up for discussion at the UN Security Council.
      Called a threat to peace. The threat of democracy. Lunatic dictator. The whole country is stigmatized, again, by the "evil empire."
      And the lamb goat will again ride around, bleating about all of the above.
      And this was not the first time.
  47. Dimy4
    Dimy4 9 March 2018 16: 37
    +1
    By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located ....

    I really thought that now he would say that they (that is, we) do not know where the States are located.
  48. birs
    birs 9 March 2018 16: 38
    +3
    He said so in vain, because then it turns out that since the American submarine fleet is in perfect order, he does not need additional funding, and this is not far from budget cuts. Short-sighted.
  49. Graz
    Graz 9 March 2018 16: 39
    +1
    so they can split the mainland if one or two Sarmat missiles are sandwiched into the Yellowstone volcano, then this will be guaranteed
  50. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 9 March 2018 17: 01
    +1
    "By the way, they don’t know where our submarines are located, and they are capable of destroying their country if we take this course ..."
    This is the level of the general !!! Like a developmental child! There’s nothing to say, the late M. Zadornov expressed everything clearly and easily about them in a nutshell!
    Do the admirals agree with him? With the fact that nobody knows about boats? So about ours, we can say the same thing about other surprises ...
    Oh my God! Recognize this: "... They can do nothing but a massive attack against our country, to which we could not answer ..." and carry nonsense about the boats. You will then live on boats, stubborn in the trash, exceptional in dullness, individuals?