Military Review

Media: the United States tested in the Black Sea new weapons

94
The US destroyer USS Carney, who left the Black Sea in early March, tested the electronic warfare system, writes The Drive.


Media: the United States tested in the Black Sea new weapons


The AN / SLQ-32 (V) 6 equipment, upgraded as part of the Block 2 Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), was observed aboard the destroyer during the passage through the Bosphorus. According to the data on the website of the US Navy, it is intended to counter enemy rocket attacks. The upgrade has affected the radar and device signal receiver.

The publication notes that the use of equipment in the Black Sea allowed the US military to test the system in a space dominated by Russian radio electronic means.

Recall, March 4 rocket destroyer of the US Navy "Karni" left the Black Sea, where he entered February 18. Before this, the British destroyer Duncan left the area, but the US Navy destroyer Ross also entered the area.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/YorukIsik
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 7 March 2018 15: 57
    +41
    And if the Crimea had not been squeezed out on time, what would the US 6 squadron get up there ... It's scary to think men!
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 7 March 2018 16: 04
      +13
      Well, what did he try there? what
      1. st25310
        st25310 7 March 2018 16: 08
        +31
        They tested our patience ...
        1. Crowe
          Crowe 7 March 2018 16: 13
          +20
          And how did they know that the tests were successful if our missiles did not fly into them? The answer to Putin’s speech? Then somehow sluggish. Strange information, at least.
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 16: 16
            +15
            Quote: Crowe
            And how did they know that the tests were successful if our missiles did not fly into them? The answer to Putin’s speech? Then somehow sluggish. Strange information, at least.

            Well, if they didn’t shoot, then they were scared, and if they were scared, then they were successful
            1. Crowe
              Crowe 7 March 2018 16: 27
              +5
              Or maybe they couldn’t shoot? - in their opinion. Or success is considered to be the exit of this "ship". Or any of their actions are considered "exclusively" successful.
              You can laugh as much as you like, but they don’t say anything to us. Maybe a bluff, but worse if not.
              1. Angel_and_Demon
                Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 16: 37
                +8
                Quote: Crowe
                You can laugh as much as you like, but they don’t say anything to us. Maybe a bluff, but worse if not.

                so who doesn’t finish? The RF Ministry of Defense didn’t say anything about this, the states said that they were successful - and what was successful? were there launches on them? I think no, this is nonsense, ukroshumery did launches with the old Soviet missiles? so it would have been announced to the whole world how they integrated into nature and participate in the testing of the latest weapons, so where is there anything to think about?
                1. Crowe
                  Crowe 7 March 2018 16: 46
                  +5
                  I am in general. The article is strange. How have you experienced that? - unknown, but successful. Maybe they just reported? Maybe they are glad that our electronic warfare systems did not drown them. Or is this system sobering up the drinkers?
                  Some questions.
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 16: 58
                    +5
                    Quote: Crowe
                    Or is this system sobering up the drinkers?

                    maybe just the opposite? doesn’t pin, and does it seem like anything?
                  2. Red_Hamer
                    Red_Hamer 7 March 2018 17: 50
                    +3
                    How have you experienced that? - unknown, but successful. Maybe they just reported?
                    We tested the new AN / SLQ-32 (V) 6 (electronic intelligence and electronic warfare system).
                  3. not main
                    not main 7 March 2018 22: 37
                    0
                    Quote: Crowe
                    I am in general. The article is strange. How have you experienced that? - unknown, but successful. Maybe they just reported? Maybe they are glad that our electronic warfare systems did not drown them. Or is this system sobering up the drinkers?
                    Some questions.

                    At least view our radio frequencies in various modes! And then EW!
                2. Vasyan1971
                  Vasyan1971 7 March 2018 17: 34
                  +4
                  Quote: Angel_and_Demon
                  states said they were successful - and what was successful?

                  Have taken away flippers, means successfully.
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 18: 40
                    +3
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    Have taken away flippers, means successfully.

                    Well, everything works - they managed to get away, so of course successfully
            2. Black Colonel
              Black Colonel 7 March 2018 16: 52
              +9
              Successful ones are when the “Balls” and “Redoubts” highlighted you in the Black Sea, and you managed to slip into the Dardanelles and the diapers were not useful.
              1. Angel_and_Demon
                Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 17: 00
                +6
                Quote: Black Colonel
                and you managed to slip into the Dardanelles and the diapers were not useful.

                so have time laughing
                1. Andrey K
                  Andrey K 7 March 2018 17: 23
                  +9
                  Quote: Angel_and_Demon
                  ... so did laughing...

                  Victor hi
                  Well sho you again - what yes why?
                  It is said successfully, then successfully - successfully eat ... save on diapers, this is also a successXXX laughing
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 17: 34
                    +4
                    Quote: Andrey K
                    This is also a successXxx

                    besides financial - so nothing personal, now on this base they will create pocket ones and will issue them to all military personnel lol
          2. LiSiCyn
            LiSiCyn 7 March 2018 16: 38
            +4
            Quote: Crowe
            The answer to Putin’s speech?

            I think the answer to the speech of the GDP is that they quickly screwed from there ... They didn’t expect a dirty trick from under the water lol And here, this is shown on TV .. belay
            1. Angel_and_Demon
              Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 17: 36
              +5
              Quote: LiSiCyn
              I think the answer to the speech of GDP is that they quickly screwed from there ...

              GDP has many interesting answers to their questions
              1. LiSiCyn
                LiSiCyn 7 March 2018 23: 28
                +1
                Once again I am convinced that Putin has a unique craving, with self-education ... Without hesitation, a complicated economy. terms ... Well, wit, he did not hold ... Still, the rigidity of Stalin ... It would be possible to make such a breakthrough ... good
          3. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 8 March 2018 00: 02
            +1
            Quote: Crowe
            And how did they know that the tests were successful if our missiles did not fly into them? The answer to Putin’s speech? Then somehow sluggish. Strange information, at least.
            I don’t know how much they were able to test the reliability of their system, but there is already a result of the consequences of Putin’s speech, which is that the Pentagon receives a lot of reports about dismissal from military service from the crew. It’s just that people who yesterday hollowed with impunity for innocent victims today do not want to be in their place and recognize themselves as a target, even with a new “stray” on board.
        2. XXXIII
          XXXIII 7 March 2018 16: 22
          +2
          Quote: st25310
          They tested our patience ...

          Exactly... good
        3. Svarog
          Svarog 7 March 2018 16: 23
          +6
          Quote: st25310
          They tested our patience ...

          To sink .. say mine of the second world .. tests were not successful ..
      2. Dezinto
        Dezinto 7 March 2018 16: 12
        +9
        Well, what did he try there?


        We replenished the set of Russian idiomatic expressions - they did not understand anything and set sail for the sunset. winked
        The tricksters overheard something like this:

        Well, can I see it then? And what is this compartment where we are now?
        “Eighteenth,” the commander says, “I ask you to proceed to the bulkhead hatch.”
        - In the nineteenth? - the Foreign Minister proudly boasts of her knowledge of mathematics.
        - Into him, yes.
        Go on to the eighth.
        - And this is the twentieth?
        - No, it's the eighth.
        - And the nineteenth last, or what?
        “No, on this board is the last sixteenth.”
        - And on the other - the seventeenth? - the minister is trying to crush with logic.
        - No, on the other - the fifteenth. And the seventeenth in our nose, between the first and second.

        So let them listen further ....
      3. cormorant
        cormorant 7 March 2018 17: 18
        +2
        They tested the lathes of the new system. With a more powerful vacuum system, so that with massive use, the tremors will no longer clog ... laughing
      4. ochakow703
        ochakow703 7 March 2018 17: 59
        +1
        We tried a new paint, draw a target on board. The tests were successful - the water of the Russian Sea does not wash off the target from the board of the Amer ship.
      5. self-propelled
        self-propelled 7 March 2018 23: 31
        +1
        so I don’t understand, Russia included its "electronic means of influence"? or did the Americans just walk by?
    2. iouris
      iouris 7 March 2018 17: 14
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      if Crimea had not been squeezed on time

      Crimea itself.
    3. Maz
      Maz 7 March 2018 21: 17
      0
      And the tama of old German mines does not come up with minreps? And then you can find a couple and bring it under the bottom, and let it go with positive buoyancy from the bottom into the keel of the hull - then they’ll prove it and try it. Shaw from our mine Bula. Immediately stop crawling.
    4. Warrior-80
      Warrior-80 7 March 2018 21: 20
      0
      Right now, our Israeli friends will appear and say that the American and Israeli are the best and our reb so mediocrity
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto 7 March 2018 16: 00
    +15
    Well, here I have one association ....................... with all due respect ..... corny of course, but I like the introduction, the Americans will never understand ours Navy, do not translate ... no way!
    "What would the gateway not get dirty, and Bosko did not hang out!" )))) Well, how can this be translated !? )))

    1. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 7 March 2018 21: 28
      0
      Quote: DEZINTO

      13
      DEZINTO Today, 16:00 New
      Well, here I have one association ....................... with all due respect ..... corny of course, but I like the introduction, the Americans will never understand ours Navy, do not translate ... no way!
      "What would the gateway not get dirty, and Bosko did not hang out!" )))) Well, how can this be translated !? )))

      Banter. Fun, of course, but bragging and hatred from the military can have a sad continuation.
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 7 March 2018 16: 00
    +7
    And how did he test him on us, if we did not touch him? dbb or
    The Drive
    writes for dbb?
    1. Rostislav
      Rostislav 7 March 2018 16: 12
      +7
      To the point.
      As correctly noted in one of the articles on VO, stupid plays are not stupid writers writing. Dumb plays are written for dumb readers.
      1. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 7 March 2018 17: 38
        0
        Quote: Rostislav
        As correctly noted in one of the articles on VO, stupid plays are not stupid writers writing. Dumb plays are written for dumb readers.

        Wai, well said! How did I miss it. Thank! I’ll write it in my little book, for I feel it will come in handy in life. hi
    2. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 7 March 2018 21: 36
      0
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      And how did he test him on us, if we did not touch him? dbb or
      The Drive
      writes for dbb?

      The radio intelligence system, which was tested on destroyers, is designed to take signals, classify and determine the coordinates of radio emission sources. In a row: radar detection, radar guidance, navigation systems, communications, etc.
      The more actively we respond to the appearance of destroyers, the more complete information they will collect about our group on the Black Sea and its environs
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 7 March 2018 21: 56
        +3
        The radio intelligence system, which was tested on destroyers, is designed to take signals, classify and determine the coordinates of radio emission sources. In a row: radar detection, radar guidance, navigation systems, communications, etc.
        ANY RTR system is designed for this - as you noticed with startling evidence. The Black Sea Fleet understands this much better than you and me winked hi
        1. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 8 March 2018 11: 38
          0
          Quote: KVU-NSVD
          KVU-NSVD Yesterday, 21:56 ↑
          The radio intelligence system, which was tested on destroyers, is designed to take signals, classify and determine the coordinates of radio emission sources. In a row: radar detection, radar guidance, navigation systems, communications, etc.
          ANY RTR system is designed for this - as you noticed with startling evidence. The Black Sea Fleet understands this much better than you and me

          At the Black Sea Fleet, they probably understand. And it’s possible that it’s not very - in previous visits, for some reason, they demonstrated the capabilities of our electronic warfare and the combat modes of the radar systems of coastal anti-ship missile systems, for no good reason.
          The second part of the question - they write here not for officers of the Black Sea Fleet, but for the couch audience, which, for the most part, hovers somewhere in the heavens, far from earthly realities.
          The third part, new visitors of RTR, with advanced capabilities, are standing at the current visitors, that's why the Yankees tested it.
          1. KVU-NSVD
            KVU-NSVD 8 March 2018 11: 48
            +4
            new visitors of RTR, with advanced capabilities, are standing at the current visitors, that's why the Yankees tested it.
            Testing is being tested, but only the testers are limited by the minimum average for tracking visitors, and therefore the super-sophistication of new systems in this case is not enough, which gives. For the sake of Pontus, no one will post the capabilities of combat regimes for all to see. This is an axiom for the army in general and for the Black Sea Fleet in particular. There are no fools there.
  4. Prospero
    Prospero 7 March 2018 16: 02
    +1
    Eye yes eye needed.
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 7 March 2018 16: 03
    +7
    the use of equipment in the Black Sea allowed the US military to test the system in a space dominated by Russian electronic means of influence.

    I would like a test result ...
    On March 4, the US Navy missile destroyer Karni left the Black Sea

    and hit the road why?
    1. Angel_and_Demon
      Angel_and_Demon 7 March 2018 16: 21
      +6
      Quote: Masya Masya
      and hit the road why?

      and if the Russian EWs "prevailed" - then what? write off a quarter of the crew again?
    2. Dezinto
      Dezinto 7 March 2018 16: 26
      +5
      and hit the road why?


      The time spent on the Black Sea by a detachment of warships of non-Black Sea countries should not exceed 21 days.

      Montreux Convention.

      love
      1. Masya masya
        Masya masya 7 March 2018 16: 38
        +8
        love the tonnage had to be checked ... wink maybe they would have wound up faster ...
    3. Antares
      Antares 7 March 2018 16: 27
      +2
      Quote: Masya Masya
      and hit the road why?

      they are on a rotational basis + Montreux Convention.
    4. NikolaiN
      NikolaiN 7 March 2018 16: 30
      +2
      and hit the road why?
      I heard somewhere that they can be in the Black Sea only for a limited period of time, how much I don’t remember. Therefore, one went, another went, etc.
    5. XXXIII
      XXXIII 7 March 2018 16: 30
      +5
      Quote: Masya Masya
      and hit the road why?
      Remember more ..... lol
      1. Masya masya
        Masya masya 7 March 2018 16: 42
        +7
        love
        Go Russia!!! and always ahead !!!
  6. Strashila
    Strashila 7 March 2018 16: 05
    0
    They experienced ... ours, they trained the same.
  7. Wolka
    Wolka 7 March 2018 16: 05
    0
    but left with nothing ...
  8. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 7 March 2018 16: 06
    +5
    SLQ-32 (V) 5 has served faithfully for 30 years. The time has come for SLQ-32 (V) 6.
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 7 March 2018 16: 37
      +2
      Quote: A. Privalov
      SLQ-32 (V) 5 has served faithfully for 30 years. The time has come for SLQ-32 (V) 6.

      And what is this on the American ship flag of Turkey in the photo, a mistake ?!
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 7 March 2018 17: 59
        +4
        Quote: XXXIII
        And what is this on the American ship flag of Turkey in the photo, a mistake ?!

        No, not a mistake. During the passage of the Bosphorus-Dardanelles, ships, in respect (if respected), hang the Turkish flag.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 7 March 2018 18: 08
          +2
          Quote: Kurare
          Quote: XXXIII
          And what is this on the American ship flag of Turkey in the photo, a mistake ?!

          No, not a mistake. During the passage of the Bosphorus-Dardanelles, ships, in respect (if respected), hang the Turkish flag.

          So they didn’t swim to us .... laughing
      2. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 7 March 2018 21: 16
        +2
        Quote: XXXIII
        And what is this on the American ship flag of Turkey in the photo, a mistake ?!

        It also says: Used photos: https://twitter.com/YorukIsik. And this very Yörük Işık is a Turk.
  9. gig334
    gig334 7 March 2018 16: 07
    +1
    It’s not cool, but Americans are catching up in electronic warfare systems, Russia is ahead of everyone in this direction, just like in rocket science, I'm talking about nuclear, cruise, hypersonic missiles. And the Black Sea for the Americans is a grave. At the first collision, their entire fleet on the Black Sea will be destroyed.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 7 March 2018 18: 55
      +2
      Why are catching up? Every third plane on their aircraft carriers -
      specialized jammer F-18 Growler (EA-18G Growler)
      Containers under the plane (orange in the diagram) - electronic jamming devices for jamming radars
      In addition, the Americans on standard armament of strike aircraft have a special missile,
      working on radars AGM-88 HARM (high-speed anti-radiation missile)
      1. Charik
        Charik 7 March 2018 19: 29
        0
        agm 88 range what? more than air defense missiles?
        1. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 7 March 2018 21: 59
          +1
          Quote: Charik
          agm 88 range what? more than air defense missiles?

          More. It can be launched from low altitudes when the plane does not see air defense radars.
          At the initial stage, the rocket is directed to the given coordinates by the inertial system, and then to the radio emission source (radiation parameters are entered into memory in advance).
      2. Charik
        Charik 8 March 2018 11: 47
        0
        yes for every rocket there is another rocket
    2. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 7 March 2018 21: 51
      +2
      Quote: gig334

      0
      gig334 Today, 16:07 New
      Like it or not, but in EW systems, Americans are catching up,

      You are mistaken. We have efficient electronic warfare systems in prototypes appeared in the seventies. Our opponents - in the forties. The more we demonstrate the capabilities of our new EW systems from children's foppishness without sufficient justification, the less effective they will be. The age of effectiveness of electronic warfare systems is very short - until its characteristics are studied and the systems against which this electronic warfare is working are developed. Both in Vietnam and the Middle East, the scales fluctuated as the radar's immunity and EW systems were further refined.
  10. Herculesic
    Herculesic 7 March 2018 16: 11
    +2
    You can laugh as much as you like, but you need to get the parameters and the possibility of their electronic warfare complex! We just need to incentivize them to turn on the electronic warfare, "slipping" them a pair of quadrocopters without identification marks. And track the operation of their complex, high-altitude drone, which will remove the parameters from their electronic warfare system.
    1. Zubr
      Zubr 7 March 2018 16: 28
      +3
      Do you think they are stupid and will be bought by drones? I doubt it very much. They need another SU-24 with KHIBINS.
    2. XXXIII
      XXXIII 7 March 2018 16: 40
      +3
      Quote: Herkulesich
      You can laugh as much as you like, but you need to get the parameters and the possibility of their electronic warfare complex! We just need to incentivize them to turn on the electronic warfare, "slipping" them a pair of quadrocopters without identification marks. And track the operation of their complex, high-altitude drone, which will remove the parameters from their electronic warfare system.

      Under the water, the Navy set up torpedoes while they were testing something there, with the Turkish flag at the match .... laughing
      1. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 7 March 2018 17: 18
        +3
        Quote: XXXIII
        Under the water, the Navy set up torpedoes while they were testing something there, with the Turkish flag at the match ....

        laughing while carnivorous licking their lips at the same time. Definitely, striped turnips are begging for a turnip. Seeker let him find it.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 7 March 2018 17: 28
          +2
          Quote: iliitch
          Quote: XXXIII
          Under the water, the Navy set up torpedoes while they were testing something there, with the Turkish flag at the match ....

          laughing while carnivorous licking their lips at the same time. Definitely, striped turnips are begging for a turnip. Seeker let him find it.

          Yes, it was necessary for the Navy to launch a couple of training torpedoes in order to flare up close, it would be easier to check the pants .... lol
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 7 March 2018 20: 03
            +2
            Yes, it was necessary for the Navy to launch a couple of training torpedoes

            What is educational? Are there few TESTS? Well, so what, that banged?
            1. Charik
              Charik 8 March 2018 12: 00
              +1
              something in August 2000, didn’t fail even where it should have been, for what and to whom.
  11. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 March 2018 16: 21
    +1
    And we, probably ... Apply the latest generation electronic warfare measures to him. wassat Will cost ...
  12. Zubr
    Zubr 7 March 2018 16: 24
    +2
    So what, but how did the tests go? Probably called our min. Defense and asked to embed them in all Antennas? =)))
  13. Antares
    Antares 7 March 2018 16: 34
    +4
    January Odessa Sea Terminal

    similarly in March.
    He spent 14 days in rotation, participated in a missile attack on Syria, his brother Ross came out earlier. At the moment, 4 US ships (which replaced each other in rotation) are not in the Black Sea.
    Americans are happy to test everything they need. However, they have few interests in the World Cup, except for the demonstration of the flag. This is not MOT.
  14. Sergey D_2
    Sergey D_2 7 March 2018 16: 43
    +2
    Nishtyaki nuclear war:
    Retinal detachment
    Skin burns
    Hair and tooth loss
    Degradation of internal organs
    Spinal cord injury
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 7 March 2018 17: 23
      0
      Quote: Sergey D_2
      Nishtyaki nuclear war:

      This is called radiation sickness ..
    2. faridg7
      faridg7 8 March 2018 00: 53
      +1
      Quote: Sergey D_2
      Nishtyaki nuclear war:
      Retinal detachment
      Skin burns
      Hair and tooth loss
      Degradation of internal organs
      Spinal cord injury

      Well, sickly, you need to report more carefully about these nishtyaks in Congress, otherwise they are apparently not up to date with you and stubbornly run into them.
  15. flicker
    flicker 7 March 2018 16: 50
    +2
    Media: the United States tested in the Black Sea new weapons
    Super diapers for personnel - now no diarrhea is terrible for the brave American sailors.
  16. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 7 March 2018 16: 53
    +1
    Ours, too, last year near the US shores “oceanographed” several weeks.
    1. Charik
      Charik 8 March 2018 12: 02
      0
      Norms such an oceanographer felt-GiForda
  17. flicker
    flicker 7 March 2018 16: 54
    +4
    Meanwhile, France opposed NATO
  18. LMN
    LMN 7 March 2018 17: 04
    +3
    Well, fine. We, too, in Syria tested the Su-57 electronics (according to the MO) and after 2 days we had already returned home.

    As someone noted above, there’s nothing for anyone to catch at the World Cup. Yet during the Second World War, the Germans were reluctant to enter this mousetrap. I'm also sure the issue will be resolved.

    Let them spend ..
  19. iouris
    iouris 7 March 2018 17: 19
    +1
    The development of weapons is an endless process. However, the Black Sea should be closed by warships of the USA and Great Britain.
  20. lance
    lance 7 March 2018 17: 20
    0
    Of course, the trials were successful - the Su-24s did not fly in with the Khibiny (is afraid), the ball radar is silent (afraid). During the time of being in the World Cup there are no incidents - the device is working.
  21. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 7 March 2018 17: 25
    0
    Quote: vlad66
    Well, what did he try there? what

    I listened to the GDP message for the assembly! Even before the GDP said it, it was encrypted using Conan Doyle's book and sent to Trump with mail tuna! A copy with mail beavers sent to Israel!
  22. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 7 March 2018 17: 27
    0
    Quote: iouris
    The development of weapons is an endless process. However, the Black Sea should be closed by warships of the USA and Great Britain.

    For this, Turkey needs to get out of NATA and a bunch of all kinds of UN resolutions, etc. will have to change ...
  23. san4es
    san4es 7 March 2018 17: 27
    +2
    ... Before the trials in the Black Sea (for the translation sorry hi ):
    Block 2 is the last in the evolutionary sequence of improving the “blocks” of the Navy to conduct an electronic warfare system for its ship, which will gradually add new defensive technologies and functionality. In 2009, the Navy on a competitive basis, in Lockheed Martin, a contract for the development of SEWIP block 2. The company recently completed successful integration and testing for two block 2 models, design developments at the Lockheed Martin electronic warfare systems stand in Syracuse, New York State.


    ... After the tests:
    The report said that the Navy integrated the sensors of the Executive Service program (PEO CPC 2.0), which manages itself / the slq-32 SEWIP initiative, into the combat system above the water, “not to effectively develop and manage electronic warfare systems for blocks 1B1 and 1B2. This happened because PEO СРС 2.0 does not solve all the main shortcomings before or after entering the full course of paragraphs. ”

    The message adds that now additional funds will need to be spent to solve the problems associated with this. He continued that, “the tone of the CDS CDS 2.0 is not to effectively develop and manage electronic warfare and electronic support functions for unit 2 ... as a result, the CDS CDS 2.0 spent $ 1,8 million for the second phase (initial operational testing and evaluation) for Block No. 2 and the acquisition schedule increased by almost two years. ”

    http://www.monch.com/mpg/news/maritime/2464-navy-
    ew.html
  24. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 7 March 2018 17: 29
    0
    Quote: Sergey D_2
    Nishtyaki nuclear war:
    Retinal detachment
    Skin burns
    Hair and tooth loss
    Degradation of internal organs
    Spinal cord injury

    Why are you doing this? Here everyone knows about it ... Confused the site?
  25. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 7 March 2018 17: 33
    0
    Quote: Herkulesich
    You can laugh as much as you like, but you need to get the parameters and the possibility of their electronic warfare complex! We just need to incentivize them to turn on the electronic warfare, "slipping" them a pair of quadrocopters without identification marks. And track the operation of their complex, high-altitude drone, which will remove the parameters from their electronic warfare system.

    Was he really? This complex ... Which EW ... It is too early to make a stir, especially since they don’t know that while they tested something, they themselves were tested than that!
  26. andrson
    andrson 7 March 2018 18: 24
    0
    Strange guys .. They go there only to make a show for the media, and once again experience our reb))
  27. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 7 March 2018 18: 34
    +3
    There were times in the USSR! WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF ANYTHING! even sanctions and threats of nuclear weapons! wassat
    And tough act .. ALWAYS!

    We’ll expel nothing soon .. I’m sure of this guys! soldier
  28. Simon
    Simon 7 March 2018 18: 50
    +1
    Quote: Angel_and_Demon
    Quote: Crowe
    And how did they know that the tests were successful if our missiles did not fly into them? The answer to Putin’s speech? Then somehow sluggish. Strange information, at least.

    Well, if they didn’t shoot, then they were scared, and if they were scared, then they were successful

    Or maybe ours laughed at American wisdom and showed like this fool Nothing more to say about them. request
  29. Not served
    Not served 7 March 2018 20: 14
    0
    Most likely the fact that passing through the Black Sea their navigation did not show that they are sailing in the Donbass))))
  30. muhomor
    muhomor 7 March 2018 22: 00
    0
    I don’t understand why the Turkish flag is on the US ship. belay Or is it a disguise?
  31. Guillon
    Guillon 7 March 2018 22: 48
    0
    And after that, the Americans continue to brazenly declare that the missile defense system is not against Russia! wassat Oh well! angry It's time to drive them with a tattered mixer !!! soldier
  32. sleeve
    sleeve 8 March 2018 05: 00
    0
    Yes ... incomprehensible message. Calibration passed or what? And how does this help against the “Ball”? Or are our somewhere on Twitter modes and the frequency of the current work laid out to make it more convenient? Blah, blah. We conducted tests near the coast of the enemy ... and that’s it. I turned on the light bulb in the wheelhouse and the same thing. Well, I did the tests. The dishonesty of the Americans is absolutely knocking down the rail of upbringing. It’s vanging that ahead of us there will be a “set of measures” for a neat decrease in “fun” activity off our coasts using the “pressure difference effect in the anus” of stellate cavities.
  33. myobius59
    myobius59 9 March 2018 19: 29
    +1
    Quote: LiSiCyn
    Once again I am convinced that Putin has a unique craving, with self-education ... Without hesitation, a complicated economy. terms ... Well, wit, he did not hold ... Still, the rigidity of Stalin ... It would be possible to make such a breakthrough ... good

    In addition to rigidity, even more important will be the ability to select and appoint competent managers to key posts, and so that those who too, will pick up the same assistants for themselves. N and so on from top to bottom. As Comrade said Stalin, which you mentioned, is “Cadres decide EVERYTHING.” And the president has trouble with these cadres. More precisely, that is, frames, but it is SUCH FRAMES request . !!!. One DM is worth it. negative : .Yes and the rest is no better. Maybe only Shoigu MEETS his position. The rest, judging by the cases, have full official inconsistency.