An-148: winged victim of "Maidan"

22
History An-148 began as early as the 21 century. The parks of the airlines were full of outdated cars, and they had to be changed. For this case, in addition to the "Sukhoi" with his "Superjet" and "Tupolev" with Tu-334 (about him you told earlier), took and "Antonov". At first, the Ukrainians planned to create a new aircraft based on the turboprop An-140. But after weighing all the pros and cons, the Antonovs decided to create a liner from scratch.

Work on the project An-148 began with the 2001 year. Already at the design stage, a serious modernization potential was laid in it. And he realized. Now in the sky you can see an enlarged An-158 and military transport An-178. In 2004, An-148 first took off the ground. He was “driven” for three years, and in 2007 he received his first certificate.



Today this car, as it is not sad, became a victim of political disagreements between Russia and Ukraine.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    22 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. avt
      0
      7 March 2018 15: 49
      But after weighing the pros and cons, the Antonov team decided to create a ship from scratch.
      wassat That you shoo-oh-oh! ?? And the Antonovites themselves "know for this ??? Something when it was actually designed, nobody on Antonov, including the then chief designer, that the car is made on the basis of Cheburashka. A kind of An-26/24, but with dvigl under the wings . It turned out by the way very soundly. But ........
      Today this car, as it is not sad, became a victim of political disagreements between Russia and Ukraine.
      Moreover, bought back by Russia and delivered to the VASO series - three times offensive.
      1. +7
        7 March 2018 16: 28
        Quote: avt
        Themselves, the Antonovites "know for this ??? Something when it was actually designed, no one on Antonov, including the then chief designer, that the car is made on the basis of Cheburashka. A kind of An-26/24, but with dvigl under the wings.

        They know. Despite the similarities between the general layout and the An-74TK-300, the 148th is a completely new aircraft. There is no more in common between them than between the Yak-40 and the Yak-42.
        1. 0
          7 March 2018 17: 43
          good for the most 'stubborn' - it's hard to understand (net to help them). The car was created 'from scratch', without looking back at past developments. It was created in cooperation with Russian aircraft manufacturers (like the An-70, for example).
          Separately for avt - moreover, the development is not bought out, but being a JOINT project (do you feel the difference?).
          1. avt
            0
            7 March 2018 17: 55
            Quote: shura sailors
            separately for

            Quote: shura sailors
            Shura Sailors

            To begin with, figure out what cooperation is and what design is. Then we’ll talk about what and when it became
            Quote: shura sailors
            JOINT PROJECT

            So when
            Quote: shura sailors
            (feel the difference?).

            feel it. Then let's talk about mass production with the delivery from Kharkov, it seems sets of wing planes. Well, after that, about the ownership of the documentation of the right to issue and the remaining certificate for Antonov, type. I believe
            Quote: shura sailors
            it's hard to understand
            and one
            Quote: shura sailors
            (net to help them)

            It's hard to get by. But you have to try., But it’s not for
            Quote: shura sailors
            most stubborn

            Wikipedians.
            1. 0
              7 March 2018 18: 25
              Well, you are all so stubborn - you consider yourself superior to the rest, just the highest nation (such OUR peoples have already passed). Only Russia has the right to produce An-148? Or was the An-148 created in Russia? The fact that you bought the documentation - well done, sincerely glad for you, no more
              1. avt
                0
                8 March 2018 08: 04
                Quote: shura sailors
                straight superior nation (such OUR peoples have already passed)

                Well, where are we-Finno-Ugric before you - Sumerokrov in obstinacy. If at every opportunity, please show
                Quote: shura sailors
                Only Russia has the right to produce An-148? Or was the An-148 created in Russia?

                bully And we finish the right and the series precisely 148 and precisely because
                Quote: shura sailors
                Or was the An-148 created in Russia?

                It was not created in Russia and
                Quote: avt
                Remaining, ,, Antonov "type certificate.

                That is, for the application of each new rivet, you need to ask Antonov’s permission for money, not counting the extension of flight practice. Well, for the sweet - the Great SOVIET aircraft designer Antonov was born in the MOSCOW province in the village of Trinity. According to your classification, Finno-Ugric means from NOVOSIBIRSK, he and KB were transferred by decision of the Government of the USSR to Kiev.
          2. +6
            7 March 2018 18: 01
            Quote: Shura sailors
            The car was created 'from scratch', without looking back at past developments.

            Fortunately, this does not happen with sane designers. They relied on developments on the An-74TK-300.
            1. +1
              7 March 2018 18: 27
              They relied on the achievements of the Wright brothers (with the same success).
              1. +6
                7 March 2018 18: 33
                Quote: Shura sailors
                They relied on the achievements of the Wright brothers (with the same success).

                The joke didn’t work out. Practice a little more.
                1. 0
                  7 March 2018 19: 34
                  This is not a joke. In the design of the An-148 and An-74-300 common as in the aircraft of the Wright brothers and "Ilya Murovets" - they can fly
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. 0
                      7 March 2018 21: 16
                      So what's the problem? Yakovlev Design Bureau had no experience in creating a vertical take-off aircraft, but created (where did he look?), Mikoyan and Gurevich Design Bureau did not have experience in creating jet aircraft, but (oh God) built it. In the bullshit. How did they do it? And in this century of modern technology, Antonov Design Bureau cannot create a NEW aircraft with a T-tail ... It’s completely sad
                      1. 0
                        7 March 2018 21: 18
                        Interestingly, An-74-300 created looking at whom (what)? After all, they didn’t create this ...
                        1. The comment was deleted.
                        2. avt
                          0
                          8 March 2018 08: 08
                          Quote: shura sailors
                          Interestingly, An-74-300 created looking at whom (what)?

                          bully Well, there are two options - or think about the digit 74 and then find confirmation that
                          is an upgraded version of the base AN-74
                          Or according to the tradition of the Sumerian
                          richer with his dumka
                          write about
                          Quote: shura sailors
                          Relying on the achievements of the Wright brothers
          3. +1
            7 March 2018 21: 57
            oh from scratch? probably this is their first plane and there were no backlogs before?
            1. +1
              7 March 2018 23: 02
              Any doubts? T-34 and T-84 were built at the same factory (although at different times). And the "Oplot" was built on the backlogs of the T-34?
              1. +2
                7 March 2018 23: 14
                "... and then Ostap suffered ..." crying
    2. 0
      7 March 2018 22: 01
      Avis-bis,
      don't strain, it's not worth it. learned the mantra of necessity and repeats from koment to koment.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          7 March 2018 22: 40
          apparently the person is upset by the current situation, when suddenly all the ostentatious need has become of no interest to anyone and is not needed. Here and dust at all.
          Unfortunately, I am an ignorant person in aviation. therefore, I really can’t say anything. the theme of land vehicles is closer to me.
          1. 0
            7 March 2018 23: 12
            I am absolutely satisfied with my life and do not crave the recognition of my every need.
        2. 0
          7 March 2018 23: 09
          How is it - the operating time from An-74-300TK was used and at the same time the aircraft was developed from scratch? Do not you find some dissonance in your expressions? You either remove the cross or put on your underpants.
      2. 0
        7 March 2018 23: 05
        Yes, no one talks about 'necessity.' You think that there is my opinion, but there is something wrong. you cannot understand a question
        1. 0
          7 March 2018 23: 47
          An-148 aircraft are now releasing new ?!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"