Military Review

Five "Boreev" will be built with enhanced nuclear missile weapons

62
Five "Boreev" will be built with enhanced nuclear missile weapons

According to the contract of the Ministry of Defense and the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC), five strategic nuclear submarines (APL) of the Borey-class 955A Pr. With enhanced nuclear missile weapons are to be built. According to ITAR-TASS, citing a source in the Military Industrial Commission (MIC) in the Russian government, signing the contract before the May holidays is possible, provided the military department submits a detailed conclusion on all articles of price proposals previously formulated by industry.

Earlier, on April 14, the head of the military-industrial complex Vice-Premier Dmitry Rogozin sent an order to the Ministry of Defense to provide such an opinion on Borei-class strategic nuclear submarines. Despite the promise to give an answer within a month, until this order is not executed. Upon receipt of the justification in the last decade of April, a meeting of representatives of the USC and the Ministry of Defense, chaired by Dmitry Rogozin, should be held to resolve all issues regarding the conclusion of the state contract.

"This is a contract for the construction of five strategic submarines of the Borey class 955A project with enhanced nuclear missile weapons, at least 50% of the systems and components of which are completely new and have no analogues in the domestic shipbuilding," said a source in the military industrial complex. The contract volume exceeds 100 billion, and the whole series of eight Borey-class submarines, including and the last five, must be built before the end of 2018.

According to the General Staff of the Russian Navy, starting with the fourth serial submarine missile-carrier of 955 Ave. Nicholas St., they will be carried not by 16, but by 20 of Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles. Now work on the submarine "St. Nicholas" without an official ceremony of laying the ship is already underway, but the money has not yet been received. On the eve of the first deputy minister of defense of Russia Alexander Sukhorukov announced the readiness of the state contract for the construction of "Boreev", which the other day "will be sent to the company for signing".
Originator:
http://www.arms-expo.ru
62 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. domokl
    domokl April 23 2012 13: 12
    +28
    Well, it broke through the good news after lunch ... Strategic missile carriers are retaliation weapons that will serve to cool hot heads and heat frostbitten
    1. older
      older April 23 2012 13: 15
      +24
      I agree ... Such ships not only frighten enemies but also decorate the fleet ... And Russia is worthy of such missile carriers!
      1. vadimus
        vadimus April 23 2012 14: 17
        +16
        While such titans are serving under water, the overseas "friends" can only spit saliva ...
        1. Neighbor
          Neighbor April 23 2012 16: 32
          +8
          at least 50% of systems and units which are completely new and have no analogues in domestic shipbuilding "
          Contract volume exceeds 100 billion rubles
          What can I say! HOORAY!!!!! Keep it up!!!!
          Go Russia!!!! drinks drinks drinks
          Quote: domokl
          cooling hot heads and heating frostbitten
          good good laughing
    2. Kasym
      Kasym April 23 2012 13: 31
      +14
      Guys, don't jinx it. The bureaucrats are butting for prices. And the Navy, oh, how these boats are needed.
      1. Virtor
        Virtor April 23 2012 14: 45
        +3
        AND! Anyway, it’s useless anyway, they will soprut a part ... It’s simply not possible for them ...
    3. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus April 23 2012 15: 04
      +8
      You see how good everything is, there will be Boreas "Reinforced", and some here before the elections were worried, worried that all the good news would end after March 4th, but that's how it happened, the action on May 6 "5in20 in five boreys one free" This is XNUMX missiles the bonus is obtained!
      1. alexng
        alexng April 24 2012 00: 34
        +1
        I think it will be even more interesting further, especially after Putin took office. The formation of Russia began, and the further into the forest, the thicker the partisans, i.e. PLABR. Recently, every day, there is new news about the increase in the power of the country. And now the time has come when it is necessary to send humanitarian aid to NATO - a vessel full of diapers, i.e. medicine for "Bulava". It is a response to the gloating over the failure of this racket, which has become a pain in the ass for the West. Further sarcasm in the direction of the Russian OPK is fraught with the risk of receiving an aspen stake in return - the renewed "Satan".
  2. Vanek
    Vanek April 23 2012 13: 13
    +15
    But this is good news. Still to restore the institutions for training.
    1. older
      older April 23 2012 13: 16
      +9
      Hmm .... The training of crews urgently needs to be restored ... And it will turn out like the Ukrainians .. There simply are no crews for boats ..
      1. viruskvartirus
        viruskvartirus April 23 2012 14: 34
        +3
        :( unfortunately the Sevastopal submariners' training base is lost ... I can testify to this, at least it will be difficult to restore it .... and the peak of lawlessness came just at the end of my studies ... now in SevVMIU "Holland" "Institute of noble girls "...
    2. Armata
      Armata April 23 2012 13: 21
      +11
      Quote: Vanek
      Still to restore institutions for training

      But what about the Kuznetsov Academy in St. Petersburg? It is in demand and produces high-class specialists, but with training it is worse. And in general, I don’t understand how in the 1 year of service you can make an upscale specialist from the fry? Why did you cancel the 3 of the year when you could have been well-trained and had time to put knowledge into practice?
      1. Vanek
        Vanek April 23 2012 13: 28
        +8
        I’m probably the most stupid here because I still don’t know how many people are currently serving in the Navy. If also, one year, then I do not know, there are no words ..................
        1. Armata
          Armata April 23 2012 13: 33
          +13
          Quote: Vanek
          If also, one year, then I do not know, there are no words ..................

          Exactly 1 year. They say that they will increase the service life, but while the moms of indoor soldiers cry, the officials accordingly delay and nothing moves.
          1. Vanek
            Vanek April 23 2012 13: 42
            +6
            Eugene, thank you. I'll know.

            In the fleet for 1 year - POSORISCH.
            1. plotnikov561956
              plotnikov561956 April 23 2012 14: 09
              +4
              The issue of conscripts in the submarine fleet is not acute, the Kursk has a fond memory, there were only 22 sailors out of 118 crew members
          2. nycsson
            nycsson April 23 2012 13: 49
            +16
            Quote: Steam Train
            Exactly 1 year. They say that they will increase the service life, but while the moms of indoor soldiers cry, the officials accordingly delay and nothing moves.

            Shame and disgrace! When they took me for an urgent payment, my parents didn’t even say a word about the farmer’s! Divorced half of the country sissies who hid behind their mother’s skirt and dad’s wallet !!! Everyone should serve in the army, and at least two years, or even three, if in the Navy !!! Indeed, the defense capability of our country depends on this !!! My father told me that during his youth, if you did not serve in the army, the girls shied away from you, like hell from incense !!! Since it was believed that if you did not take into the army, it means that there are health problems, and there will be no healthy children from you !!! And now they turned everything upside down, went into the army, then ........., didn’t go, handsome, then there is money !!!
            1. Armata
              Armata April 23 2012 14: 14
              +12
              Quote: nycsson
              My father told me that during his youth, if you did not serve in the army, the girls shied away from you, like hell from incense !!! Since it was believed that if you did not take into the army, it means that there are health problems, and there will be no healthy children from you !!! And now they turned everything upside down, went into the army, then ........., didn’t go, handsome, then there is money !!!

              3 of the year, I spanked my boots. And my wife waited for me and we have been living with her for 22 years together. And for those who are afraid, there is a foreign land there for them democrats will intercede. Annoyed that our children are littering our brains every day. angry
              Personally, my proposal to introduce censorship as before, said something against the country in a psychiatric hospital, and did it in prison.
              1. nycsson
                nycsson April 23 2012 14: 45
                +5
                Quote: Steam Train
                And my wife waited for me and we have been living with her for 22 years together.

                A beautiful wife! Did you serve in the navy? The army teaches a lot, it is a pity that the current generation does not understand this! The whole question is state policy! This problem can be solved once or twice! I didn’t join the army, which means you have no privileges, I’ve gone - the green light is everywhere!
                1. Armata
                  Armata April 23 2012 14: 53
                  +17
                  Quote: nycsson
                  A beautiful wife! Did you serve in the navy?

                  And the wife is beautiful. smile And I still haven’t been with the fleet, only now I'm building, my father says that this is a diagnosis))))) He built self-propelled guns all his life, and I’m the court.
                  1. nycsson
                    nycsson April 23 2012 18: 11
                    +5
                    Quote: Steam Train
                    And I still haven’t been with the fleet, only now I'm building, my father says that this is a diagnosis))))) He built self-propelled guns all his life, and I’m the court.

                    Respectfully.........
      2. nycsson
        nycsson April 23 2012 14: 10
        +6
        Quote: Steam Train
        Why did you cancel the 3 of the year when you could have been well-trained and had time to put knowledge into practice?

        But this is from the state of ... of us! The enemies of our homeland have tried hard to push through this issue!
  3. toguns
    toguns April 23 2012 13: 16
    +7
    drinks Improved Boreas are good !!!
  4. sichevik
    sichevik April 23 2012 13: 17
    +6
    Oh, I’d rather build them and give them to the fleet !!! And then, time is running out. To have time !!! And the news is really good.
  5. Ty3uk
    Ty3uk April 23 2012 13: 24
    0
    Is this news? The fact that "Borei" will go from 20 launchers starting from "St. Nicholas" has been known for two years, probably.
    Well, yes, here I am, dope, this is Rogozin tweeted !! laughing
  6. Tersky
    Tersky April 23 2012 13: 30
    +8
    Beauty!!! 20 vs 16 is + 4, delivery of at least 10 from 20 and hit guaranteed drinks
  7. Sokol peruna
    Sokol peruna April 23 2012 13: 39
    +4
    It is unrealistic to build the 5th PLABLE pr. 955U in 5 and a half years on one Sevmash. Bookmark 4 of the body is shifted to the right for 3 years. Maybe this is finally laid. According to the name, the Navy also did not officially name 4 the corps. He became St. Nicholas with the light hand of the former Gene. Director Sevmash Kalistratov. At the Pacific Fleet there is already a diesel-electric submarine B-445 “Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker”. Most likely, the new submarine will be named in honor of a commander.
    1. Ty3uk
      Ty3uk April 23 2012 14: 15
      +1
      Quote: Sokol Peruna
      Bookmark 4 of the body is shifted to the right for 3 years. Maybe this is finally laid.

      A bit wrong. The laying ceremony is postponed, because the signing of the contract is constantly postponed for well-known reasons, and in fact "St. Nicholas" has been built for a long time.
      1. Sokol peruna
        Sokol peruna April 23 2012 14: 59
        +2
        So ktozh argues. Usually the ship is laid on a slipway with 5-10 percent of technical readiness. It is possible that they have already formed a strong body by 60-80%. But everything is exactly Sevmash for 8 years it is unlikely that it will survive the 5th PLABR, pr. 955U, 6 ICAPL, pr. 885M, repair + modernization of TAKR pr. 11435 Admiral Kuznetsov, modernization 4 TARKR pr. 1144 (1144.2). This is unrealistic, too much work.
        1. Ty3uk
          Ty3uk April 23 2012 15: 37
          +4
          On boats, I agree, there is a risk. But they could have been in the Union, so this is not from the realm of fantasy.
          "Kuzya" will be modernized by the same guys that are sculpting "Gorshkov" now, so I see no problems.
          As for TARKRs, there seems to be only one of them in GOZ-2020. "Nakhimov" is already being finished; the next one will be done by the same guys.
          1. Sokol peruna
            Sokol peruna April 23 2012 16: 01
            +1
            Kuznetsov needs at least 5 years to modernize. Now there is not even a project for its modernization. Before 2013, work would not start on any.

            Adm. Nakhimov has not yet begun to modernize. And will start no earlier than 2013.

            http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20111202/504201814.html

            As for the TARKRs, then in GOZ-2020 there seems to be only one of them.


            If this is true, then Kirov and Adm. Lazarev will go for recycling.
            1. altman
              altman April 23 2012 16: 34
              +2
              Kirov has long been decommissioned .. but Adm. Lazareva would very much like to return the Pacific Fleet to service !! And if the modernization project is developed this year, can it begin to be modernized at the Amur Shipbuilding?
              1. Sokol peruna
                Sokol peruna April 23 2012 17: 34
                +1
                I heard that Lazarev was dragged to Severodvinsk on Sevmash. But the prospects for it are rather illusive. It seems like a fire destroyed the control post of the power plant and one of the turbines was seriously damaged. Moreover, the add-on from AMg rotted on it. Its repair + modernization will be much more expensive than Nakhimov’s, and the terms are longer.

                According to Kirov, I recently came across information that he did not seem to be decommissioned, but in conservation. Maybe they again introduced as B-239 "Karp" pr. 945. in the hope of modernization?
                1. Foamas
                  Foamas April 23 2012 23: 01
                  +1
                  If you look at the materials from the network, then the technical condition of Kirov (Kalinin) is much better than that of Lazarev, just look at the photo and make sure that the disassembly of its Pacific counterpart is clearly higher.
            2. Ty3uk
              Ty3uk April 23 2012 17: 10
              +1
              Quote: Sokol Peruna
              Kuznetsov needs at least 5 years to modernize. Now there is not even a project for its modernization. Before 2013, work would not start on any.

              I agree. Because "Gorshkov" will be done by the end of 2012. And as soon as they finish, so immediately and "Kuzey" will be engaged.

              Quote: Sokol Peruna
              Adm. Nakhimov has not yet begun to modernize. And will start no earlier than 2013.

              As to Nakhimov, you are probably right. So I will do it for 3-4 years, and then "Lazarev".

              In short, the plans are real.
  8. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov April 23 2012 13: 41
    +4
    More and more such news. Early, some buried VPK, finally early
  9. sergskak
    sergskak April 23 2012 13: 42
    +2
    1)perhaps subject to the submission by the military department of a comprehensive conclusion on all articles of price proposals previously formulated by industry.
    2)Rogozin sent to the Ministry of Defense an order to provide such an opinion
    3)until this order is executed

    How much can you deal with this red tape? !!! Or is it that everyone starts to work with accelerating kick Rogozin only ?!
  10. Trailer
    Trailer April 23 2012 13: 43
    +5
    The deal on 100 billion rubles! However, on the same site there was previously a note on the reduction of the State Defense Order this year by 25 billion rubles. On 5 boats, it turns out that one is no longer in demand, or how? All the time they blow about what will be built, but at the same time answer me the following questions:
    1. Why are they silent about the restoration of training institutes for these ships?
    2. Why does the declared increase in the number of weapons reduce funding for their purchase?
    3. How does the introduction of new technologies relate when the leading domestic defense enterprises go bankrupt?
  11. Vulkan raven
    Vulkan raven April 23 2012 13: 44
    0
    My concern is that an increase in the number of missiles = an increase in the number of warheads, but the number of warheads is limited by the START treaty. So it turns out that on Boreya alone there will be 2 / 3 arsenal of strategic nuclear forces. At the same time, submarines are potentially very vulnerable - after all, the likely enemy has superiority at sea. For each of the 8 of our SSBNs, he can allocate more 50 of his ICAPLs ....
    1. Ty3uk
      Ty3uk April 23 2012 14: 18
      +1
      Quote: Vulkan Raven
      For each of our 8 SSBNs, he can allocate more than 50 of his ICAPLs ....

      And why not immediately at 100500 ??
    2. Armata
      Armata April 23 2012 14: 42
      +5
      Quote: Vulkan Raven
      If the adversary is superior at sea

      It has superiority at sea only due to the greater displacement in the mass of all ships. As for weapons and combat effectiveness, I would not say. If you count all the aircraft carriers (tons of useless iron with which the Amrs scare everyone in the hope that the more the better) then yes they will certainly prevail over us. We can only say that in a fight between a cow and a wolf, a cow with more weight and size survives much less often. Or is it considered superior to the fact that for the protection of 1 aircraft carrier you need a squadron of escort ships? In this case, if the aircraft carrier is hit, and the design of the aircraft carrier itself is, oh, how vulnerable, should they all drown in shame? I liked the statement of our unforgettable cap when we saw this miracle in the net in 92. "guys, but it's harder to hit us"
      1. Vulkan raven
        Vulkan raven April 23 2012 17: 52
        +2
        I'm sorry, I grabbed a dashing, of course they total there will be about / more 50 ICAPLs by the time the 8 Boreevs are built. But still, the alignment is not in our favor (do not forget Ohio with the Tomahawks, etc., etc.).

        And then all sorts of nuances begin, KOH, SLCM strike on bases, etc.

        Personally, I believe (IMHO) that grouping a large part of the nuclear arsenal in such potentially vulnerable carriers as nuclear submarines is not too far-sighted. It’s best to differentiate the arsenal as much as possible, use unconventional carriers — BZHRK, disguised as PGRK civilian wagons, transporters with air-launched missiles, etc., etc. — are less vulnerable.

        Well, or cancel strategic offensive arms and shove warheads without restrictions. winked
        1. Ty3uk
          Ty3uk April 23 2012 18: 35
          +1
          Sorry, catch +. smile

          As for nuclear submarines as an element of strategic nuclear forces, they are just the least vulnerable.
          BZHRK, not to mention "PGRK disguised as civilian trucks" have huge security problems, because they will be on duty on public roads, and this is still the hemorrhoid.
          Aviation takes time to deploy, with a sudden attack, airfields will be destroyed 100% first.
          PGRK, although they also require time to deploy, are smaller and also they are on duty in shifts in the forests and swamps, where their combat stability is very high.
          And now the SSBN. An almost silent boat in thousands of square kilometers of water is worse than a needle in a haystack - the highest combat stability. Ideally, its full cover requires one ICAPL and an aircraft carrier group in the area of ​​combat patrol.
          1. Eugene
            Eugene April 23 2012 21: 56
            0
            Constantly our and amerskiye boats collided in the Cold War. Most missile carriers have a multipurpose torpedo tube hanging in the "dead zone" in the event of tension on the tail. American sensors at the bottom found them very well, because the patrol areas are known.
            However, there was a brilliant operation "Atrina", where amers could not find a division of our missile carriers in the Atlantic for 2 weeks.

            BZHRK will be on duty on common roads, this is understandable, but in case of tension in relations with someone, security can be quickly strengthened with a pair of special forces wagons. If there is a continuous air defense zone as in the union, it is not particularly necessary. Considering that we are the second in the world in terms of railway length ...
  12. Zlu
    Zlu April 23 2012 13: 48
    +5
    Something really flooded with good news today. keep it up smile
  13. Vanek
    Vanek April 23 2012 13: 50
    +10
    In general, men, agree.

    Nuclear submarine "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker" and in his hands "Bulava".

    Mother of God is a holy torpedo.

    SOUND SOUND.
  14. Bat1stuta
    Bat1stuta April 23 2012 13: 55
    +4
    more often would have pleased us with good news ... wink
  15. Pablomc
    Pablomc April 23 2012 13: 58
    -2
    I do not think that boats will be built by 2018.
    And what do conscripts do on underwater missile carriers?

    They simply should not be there.
    1. nycsson
      nycsson April 23 2012 14: 06
      +6
      Quote: PabloMC
      And what do conscripts do on underwater missile carriers?

      They simply should not be there.

      I completely agree with this! Moreover, they serve one year! To get on a boat, and even on a combat exit, you need at least a year of training and training! Previously, they served in the Navy for three years, I understand that, they trained specialists, and now what I don’t understand at all !!! And the most incomprehensible is that our society took the news about the year of service with a bang!
    2. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 April 23 2012 18: 00
      -4
      Position of cook, torpedo driver, steering-signalman, bilge operator
      That's almost it.
      1. nycsson
        nycsson April 23 2012 18: 13
        0
        Quote: plotnikov561956
        Position of cook, torpedo driver, steering-signalman, bilge operator
        That's almost it.

        I did not serve in the Navy, but it seems to me that you are mistaken.
  16. Nechai
    Nechai April 23 2012 14: 10
    +2
    Quote: Vulkan Raven
    but the number of warheads is limited by the START treaty.

    The contract is respected as long as it is beneficial to the gentleman.
    In the photo to the article, the "fish" going down looks like a new type of propulsion?
    1. favn
      favn April 23 2012 17: 22
      +2
      It looks like this. Painfully high quality "wrapped"
  17. gen.meleshkin
    gen.meleshkin April 23 2012 14: 23
    +2
    In my opinion, it’s time to nationalize the military-industrial complex until it is finally plundered. And then both orders to execute and deadlines will be executed.
  18. darkman70
    darkman70 April 23 2012 15: 18
    +1
    Good news. But it would be necessary to accelerate all this.
  19. 101
    101 April 23 2012 15: 34
    +2
    I thought that 16 was cool and 20 was infected at once 200 warheads. Now move away. But at once they’ll destroy the whole world. And then ABM and who wants to check it ABM OR NOT ABOUT
    1. sergskak
      sergskak April 23 2012 15: 49
      0
      101,
      So for the sake of interest from Wikipedia: Flag of the Russian Navy 941 “Shark” Flag of the US Navy “Ohio” Flag of the Russian Navy 667BDRM “Dolphin” Flag of the British Navy “Vengard” Flag of the French Navy “Triumph” Flag of the Russian Navy 955 “Borey”
      Appearance Typhoon class SSBN.svg SSBN726 Ohio.svg Delta IV class SSBN.svg Vanguard class SSBN.svg Triomphant class SSBN.svg Borey class SSBN.svg
      Years of construction 1976-1989 1976-1997 1981-1992 1986-2001 1989-2009 1996—2017 (plan)
      Years of service 1981-2004 1981 — present 1984 — present 1993 — present 1997 — present since 2012 (plan)
      Built 6 (1 in operation, 2 in reserve) 18 (14 in operation) 7 (3 in operation, 4 under repair) 4 4 2 (10 planned)
      Displacement (t) above water
      scuba 23
      48 000 16 746
      18 750 11 740
      18 200
      15 900 12 640
      14 335 14 720
      24 000
      The number of missiles 20 R-39 24 Trident II 16 R-29RMU2 16 Trident II 16 M45 16 or 20 "Mace"
      The thrown weight (kg) · range (km) 2550 · 8250 2800 · 7400
      ? 11300 2800 8300
      ? 11547 2800 7400
      ? 11300? 6000 1150
  20. Ziksura
    Ziksura April 23 2012 15: 37
    +1
    You say Euro PRO? .... Well, well laughing
  21. Odinplys
    Odinplys April 23 2012 16: 18
    +4
    Of course, such news is encouraging ... And at the same time they give an answer ... who does not understand ... what is being done in the country to increase combat readiness ...
  22. Mr. Truth
    Mr. Truth April 23 2012 16: 36
    +3
    This is great news. By the way, now all SSBNs will be on the SF.
    Another would have built a couple of dozen ash trees.
  23. EVIL
    EVIL April 23 2012 16: 51
    +3
    The photo clearly shows the size of these charming "babies")))
    And yet, only I hear a slight sarcasm in the title "St. Nicholas"?

    I will refrain from his "CONSOLIDATION")))
  24. sergskak
    sergskak April 23 2012 16: 52
    +3
    So for interest from a regular Wikipedia:
  25. dimks98
    dimks98 April 23 2012 17: 08
    +8
    Five "Boreys" - well ... well ... well you can get stupid! good
    If only it turned out to be true, only it would turn out to be true ...
  26. taseka
    taseka April 23 2012 18: 19
    +5
    All this pleases! Now the training is at a high level! Training and stealth duty!
  27. altman
    altman April 23 2012 19: 54
    +4
    And I was pleased with the news about "Yekaterinburg" .. laughed heartily. smile
    The cost of repairing the Yekaterinburg will be almost two times less than previously planned, since the specialists were able to find the SKAT-BDRM hydroacoustic system for the ship. "We found it in a warehouse, in oil, as they say. Due to this, the cost of repairing the boat has almost halved," Rogozin said, noting that the damage from the fire turned out to be two times less than previously reported in the media. "That is, the figure is not named, but you can calculate it yourself," the Deputy Prime Minister noted.
    What you just can’t find in our warehouse laughing
  28. suharev-52
    suharev-52 April 23 2012 21: 05
    +4
    Nice "piece" in the above warehouse. An award for his master's streak. Sincerely.
    1. Eugene
      Eugene April 23 2012 22: 01
      +1
      Total 8 strategic submarine missile carriers by the year 18?
      It seems to one that it’s not enough? They promised 10, like?

      I didn’t understand TARK on modernization, like all 3 were going to modernize?
      And why only Sevmash and Zvezdochka are engaged in modernization, and what is Komsomolsk-on-Amur silent?
  29. Pedro
    Pedro April 23 2012 21: 46
    0
    Yes! Russia is not scanty with money
    1. Goga
      Goga April 24 2012 03: 55
      0
      Pedro - Yes, I don’t mind the last ruble for a good deed - and the factories are working, people are getting wages, and the "products" are not just beautiful, but also very "useful" good
  30. firever3000
    firever3000 April 24 2012 06: 32
    +1
    I am glad that they began to build them. And let the submarine BOREAU will be worthy of their namesakes - legendary Hyperboreans! good