Saudi Abrams are shot down in Yemen

34
The next video of the destruction in Yemen appeared on the web tank Abrams Saudi Army from anti-tank complex, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta.





In the explanation to the video says that the shooting was made on the border of Yemen and Saudi Arabia in the sector of Jizan.

“During the battle, two Saudi soldiers were killed by the rebels, the bulldozer and the M1-X2 Abrams tank were destroyed,” the annotation says.

The footage shows how a guided anti-tank missile is flying toward the Abrams. Then there is an explosion, and the car is hidden in clouds of smoke and dust.



However, users doubt that the tank was completely destroyed by an ATGM rocket. The main argument indicates that the fire in the combat vehicle is not shown.

The newspaper notes that in Yemen, the rebels have burned and knocked down more than a dozen Saudi "Abrams". Also large losses of such cars were recorded in Iraq. As a result, the Iraqi authorities purchased a consignment of T-90 tanks in Russia, which is evidence of the high reliability and effectiveness of Russian armored vehicles.
  • http://defence-blog.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    6 March 2018 12: 14
    Yes, most likely not hit. The protection worked, and there was no kind of fire. Although the record ends ...
    1. +8
      6 March 2018 12: 17
      Saudi Abrams are shot down in Yemen
      got lost? ..
      give the Saudis at least Abrams, at least Armata .... but better than a camel they do not control anything laughing
      1. +4
        6 March 2018 12: 20
        The main thing for Americans to sell a tank. And what will happen to him next is not important. Since the warranty is lifetime - if the tank is destroyed, then the warranty ends smile
    2. +15
      6 March 2018 12: 21
      The Abrams (the Saudic versions) have no side protection.
      Surely there was a break. The sides are very frail. But there is no detonation. Since the shells
      are in a crazy basket.
      1. +6
        6 March 2018 12: 28
        Quote: voyaka uh
        But there is no detonation.

        most likely, due to dust, it was hit in the engine compartment
    3. +11
      6 March 2018 12: 23
      However, users doubt that the tank was completely destroyed by the ATGM missile. As the main argument, it is indicated that the fire in the combat vehicle is not shown

      Well, it’s not hit, but the camels aren’t sickly in Yemen. Yes
      1. +5
        6 March 2018 12: 28
        Destruction of the tank is not fixed! Hit - hit, but nothing more.
        1. +3
          6 March 2018 13: 36
          Quote: Artyom
          Destruction of the tank is not fixed! Hit - hit, but nothing more.

          Well, I saw that during the explosion there a rather big chunk of which flew upwards, so the minimum was out of order
    4. +1
      6 March 2018 12: 46
      Quote: bazzbazz
      Also, large losses of such machines were recorded in Iraq. As a result, the Iraqi authorities purchased a batch of T-90 tanks in Russia, which is evidence of the great reliability and effectiveness of Russian armored vehicles.

      What kind of nonsense?
      The conclusion of the finger?
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 13: 05
        Not my quote!
      2. 0
        7 March 2018 02: 36
        Actually, there is a lot of information about the losses of Abrasheks in Iraq, google to help, and the purchase of our T-90s is completely official information.
    5. mvg
      0
      6 March 2018 15: 20
      Protection against a fool? The abrams has neither dynamic nor active protection. Arrived from behind, straight into the combat unit. Hiroshima was supposed to be.
  2. +8
    6 March 2018 12: 16
    yeah ... Yemenis are not bending ... respect to them soldier
  3. +13
    6 March 2018 12: 21
    Quote: “As a result, the Iraqi authorities purchased a batch of T-90 tanks in Russia, which is evidence of the great reliability and effectiveness of Russian armored vehicles”
    Let's refrain from pompous statements so far Iraq is purchasing the T-90 mainly due to more affordable prices and lower operating costs.
    Further time will tell.
    Still, they don’t throw cucumbers at the tanks, but shoot quite serious anti-tank systems of Soviet, Israeli, Chinese and American production.
    In this case, you just need to very closely monitor the statistics and make appropriate organizational conclusions using various technical solutions and improvements, like in Syria, but it doesn’t sound like it, but today Iraq and Syria are the most important testing ground for weapons in real combat use , and if statistics on the Abrams are already collected, then regarding the T-90 it’s still only at the beginning of the journey.
    Let's hope our tanks are better.
    1. +4
      6 March 2018 12: 31
      today Iraq and Syria are the most important testing ground for weapons in real combat use, and if statistics on the Abrams are already collected, then the T-90 is still only at the beginning of the journey.
      I think the relevant statistics are kept by interested structures. And with it, including help, then the corresponding TK are issued
  4. +7
    6 March 2018 12: 24
    Why present news as a miracle?
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 22: 03
      Clickbait fashion in the media.
  5. +3
    6 March 2018 12: 24
    Minus one .. It happens ....
    1. +4
      6 March 2018 12: 31
      There is already an account for dozens, let them buy from us. Yes
      1. +12
        6 March 2018 13: 08
        ..Let they buy from us.
        wink ... "musical instruments" like this:

        ... not only the American "rhapsody" sounds on them, but also the Israeli "seven-forty"
  6. +3
    6 March 2018 12: 25
    Yemenets - respect and respect! It is a pity that the article does not indicate what type of ATGM slammed Abrams ..
    1. +3
      6 March 2018 12: 57
      Was it slammed, maybe it was just scratched?))
      There is no further video ...
  7. 0
    6 March 2018 12: 30
    Quote: Nasr
    Why present news as a miracle?

    I agree!
  8. 0
    6 March 2018 12: 32
    Quote: Thrall
    The main thing for Americans to sell a tank. And what will happen to him next is not important. Since the warranty is lifetime - if the tank is destroyed, then the warranty ends smile

    Tank Abram millionth?
  9. +2
    6 March 2018 12: 55
    I think to break through, then they struck, maybe even someone was killed, the side is always weaker than the forehead, but there was no fire and detonation, apparently there was little or no ammunition in the tower, judging by the video, there used to be at least a video from the inside of Abrams, well, the pictures ... And here most likely he left on his own.
  10. +1
    6 March 2018 13: 09
    Quote: bazzbazz
    Yes, most likely not hit. The protection worked, and there was no kind of fire. Although the record ends ...

    What protection is there? There is no active defense or active defense .... only the combined armor of the tower ...
    Most likely the penetration was but the ammunition did not detonate.
  11. 0
    6 March 2018 13: 09
    Welcome to Hell ...
  12. 0
    6 March 2018 13: 15
    That's who it is not at all a pity that the Saigis igil moderate and fsha satisfaction from such news every time, although it is not the fact that he was destroyed on the video.
  13. +1
    6 March 2018 13: 29
    The video ends at the most interesting place ... 4-5 seconds were not enough to get a feeling of "complete satisfaction"
  14. +3
    6 March 2018 14: 38
    Do you want to burn alive, go to the tank
    1. +1
      6 March 2018 20: 07
      On the T-35 - a mass grave immediately for 11 people.
      1. +1
        6 March 2018 21: 22
        Quote: Metallurg_2
        On the T-35 - a mass grave immediately for 11 people.

        Well it was necessary to build such a barn)))))
  15. 0
    6 March 2018 20: 06
    The parquet army cannot defeat any barmaley.
  16. +1
    7 March 2018 10: 41
    Quote: Penalty
    ..Let they buy from us.
    wink ... "musical instruments" like this:

    ... not only the American "rhapsody" sounds on them, but also the Israeli "seven-forty"

    Ai-ai-ai, how bad, in a peaceful Srailian tank on Lebanese land, and an ATGM. This is the Holocaust

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"