Military Review

The fastest aircraft with the fastest rocket

60
After creating the high-altitude interceptor MiG-31, Soviet aircraft designers realized that this aircraft had a huge modernization potential and could also perform various, even the most exotic functions. So, under the sunset of the existence of the USSR, plans were developed for using a specially created modification of the MiG-31D to launch the 79М6 Kontakt anti-satellite missile.


At the beginning of the 2000s, together with Kazakhstan, our country was developing another version of the famous interceptor. MiG-31I Ishim was supposed to launch subcompact spacecraft into orbit. The 10-meter rocket with a mass of 10 tons was supposed to start from the MiG and bring into space from 120 to 160 kg of payload.

In modern Russia, the MiG-31 seems to be becoming the first carrier of a hypersonic weapons mass production. The first Dagger missiles have already been taken on test combat duty in the southern regions of Russia.

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 5 March 2018 16: 35
    +1
    Yes ... This is not F-35 ... with the left software ... And how he grounded a black bird!
    1. ltc35
      ltc35 5 March 2018 18: 35
      +3
      These are completely different planes. From the word absolutely.
  2. Simon
    Simon 5 March 2018 18: 16
    +3
    Yes, a good MIG-31 interceptor was created in the Union, which has undergone modernization, and has become a good launcher for new modern missiles, especially for the first dagger missile that has already been put on pilot combat duty in the southern regions of Russia. good soldier
  3. HEATHER
    HEATHER 5 March 2018 18: 17
    +2
    Kansk.MiG-31BM.Polk. Serious guys.
  4. Yak28
    Yak28 5 March 2018 18: 33
    +1
    Personally, my old MIG-31 does not inspire confidence, no matter how the 21st century. It is strange that capitalist Russia, for so many years, could not replace the old Soviet aircraft. Maybe the MiG-31 can be put on the series again, since there wasn’t enough mind to come up with something new. I hope drawings in the 90s did not have time to sell the Americans, although they have a moment 25
    1. ved_med12
      ved_med12 5 March 2018 20: 19
      +8
      And my opinion is that this plane was a little ahead of time, birth, and now requires deep modernization in terms of avionics and weapons.
    2. Beltasir matyagu
      Beltasir matyagu 5 March 2018 20: 57
      +7
      In your opinion, if a teleport had been created 30 years ago, which other countries would not be able to do another two hundred years, then this is old, because it’s the 21st century? Lack of logic.
    3. Starlei.ura
      Starlei.ura 5 March 2018 21: 32
      +4
      Do not write stupidity! It wasn’t enough for the mind to cut it and throw it away, thank God. For the normal launch of a hypersonic rocket (so as not to make it huge), the carrier must give 3mach. There are none yet. Well, why the hell to fence something new if the old works well. You don’t eat with your feet because it sucks and junk (it’s kind of like eating with your hands for millennia, it’s time to come up with something new).
    4. Serge Gorely
      Serge Gorely 5 March 2018 23: 55
      +9
      Well, yes, yes ... wild Russians use the ancient MIG-31. And the USA is cut into the brand new B-52s. Enviously, already terrible!
  5. Vikalst
    Vikalst 5 March 2018 18: 50
    +2
    Among the Yankees, the old B-52s (which were still bombed by Vietnam) remain the main air carriers of nuclear weapons .... All of these new "inconspicuous" planes that they have been doing lately fly like stools and are only suitable for landfill (or for sale ) .... Ours also had a lot of projects like "flying wing", but wisdom was enough to go along the "well-worn track" ....
  6. Procyon lotor
    Procyon lotor 5 March 2018 23: 27
    0
    Mig 31 and Iskander were riveted and the output was Kinshal
  7. Northern warrior
    Northern warrior 6 March 2018 00: 19
    0
    I hope that the standard equipment of the “Dagger” will be a thermonuclear warhead from 100 kt and above. A very formidable weapon, capable of hitting any target in 5 km in 6-500 minutes, which will not leave the enemy the slightest chance to survive.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 6 March 2018 09: 29
      0
      Apparently there will fit 500 Kt.
      1. Northern warrior
        Northern warrior 6 March 2018 15: 12
        0
        If the mass of warheads, like the Iskander, is easy.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 9 March 2018 14: 05
          0
          And how the Radar Barrier will direct this missile to a given square - you will have to redo the MiG 31 avionics.
  8. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter 6 March 2018 04: 52
    0
    Interestingly much in our storage of the MIG-25? Change the filling and here are the dagger carriers laughing
    1. Northern warrior
      Northern warrior 6 March 2018 15: 15
      +1
      Where to get spare parts for them? To do a project to upgrade the Mig-25 under the new avionics and engines? It is better to resume the release of the Mig-31BM.
      1. Shadow shooter
        Shadow shooter 7 March 2018 04: 36
        0
        Well, the Syrians take from somewhere spare parts for them wink
        1. Northern warrior
          Northern warrior 7 March 2018 23: 44
          0
          Remove from other aircraft of this type. Mig-25s have not been manufactured for more than 30 years, so new parts are simply nowhere to come from.
  9. Ivanov IV
    Ivanov IV 6 March 2018 17: 19
    0
    Just do not understand why the MIG-31 did not break in in Syria ????
    In principle, it’s not too late. Israel has long jumped out of his pants .....
    1. NN52
      NN52 7 March 2018 13: 30
      +9
      Ivanov IV

      MIG 31 BM back in 16 in Syria, it’s actually been tested ....
  10. Cyril Troekurych
    Cyril Troekurych 7 March 2018 07: 38
    0
    dagger rocket
    as an option
    starting weight 10 tons
    after acceleration to 4400 m / s, the mass is 2 tons, it flies 10 minutes along a ballistic trajectory for a distance of 2000 km
    a target on the surface of the Earth in a dive hits at a speed of 3000 m / s
  11. Snakebyte
    Snakebyte 7 March 2018 09: 42
    0
    In fact, the MiG-31 is not the fastest aircraft.
    He can give 3M; But, irreversible deformation of the airframe from heating begins. Therefore, the speed is limited to M = 2,83. For the SR-71, this speed is cruising, the maximum speed is M = 3,2
    1. Pingo
      Pingo 7 March 2018 12: 27
      +1
      Max. permissible speed of the MiG-31 - 3400 km / h, M = 3,2
      1. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte 7 March 2018 12: 54
        0
        Yes, only after a flight at such a speed does the entire skin go in waves and the plane is written off. I saw this myself.
        The MiG-31 also has an onboard gun. After firing from it, the aircraft is also decommissioned, recoil violates the strength of the glider.
        1. Pingo
          Pingo 7 March 2018 12: 57
          0
          Where and in what year? "Specialist" on non-existent aircraft and idle nozzles, this is with the MiG-29.
          1. Snakebyte
            Snakebyte 7 March 2018 13: 39
            0
            Unlike the "experts" like you, I worked with the MiG-31 for years. And I know that they don’t write on Wikipedia. The speed limit M = 2,83 was removed only in the modification of BM, where almost the entire glider was redone.
            1. Pingo
              Pingo 7 March 2018 18: 34
              0
              What American museum did you do that is so technically incompetent? Even with a return.
        2. NN52
          NN52 7 March 2018 13: 36
          +8
          Snakebyte
          Where did you get such nonsense? Seen in a dream?
          Google for what it uses so much titanium ....
          And about the gun, well, the atas is full .... Imagine, but she shoots ....
          1. Snakebyte
            Snakebyte 7 March 2018 16: 04
            0
            I don’t need to google, I climbed these planes from nose to tail hundreds of times.
            Google the recoil of this gun, and imagine ...
            A heavy interceptor does not need a gun. This is an emergency weapon. A one-time use, which may be justified, for example, to intercept a bomber or missile defense with "special" contents. And the MiG will not fall apart from the use of the gun, he will be able to return to base. Only on the flight no one else will release him.
            When the MiG-31M was developed, the cannon was removed from it, gained weight, and two more missiles were added to the load. Unfortunately, the USSR fell apart and did not receive a development project.
            1. NN52
              NN52 7 March 2018 22: 52
              +8
              Snakebyte

              Dear, I will not read you an educational program ....
              What you covered there hundreds of times, I don’t know ,,,
              I flew them many hundreds of times and even once, as you say with a gun, shot ,,,
              According to the original design of the designers, the GSh 31 was intended for balloons, if you did not know ...
              If you don’t have my text, I’ll add, Pravdinsk ,,, you know what call sign was?
              1. Snakebyte
                Snakebyte 8 March 2018 07: 38
                0
                As you know.
                I would rather believe the real people who trained me in servicing this aircraft and my own experience than the unknown on the forum.
                1. Pingo
                  Pingo 8 March 2018 17: 14
                  0
                  Continue Psaking ... In museums with non-existent, non-flying or non-working American junk, did he climb too?
                  1. Snakebyte
                    Snakebyte 8 March 2018 23: 23
                    0
                    I’m not you, who from the flying saw only a duck under his bed.
                    1. Pingo
                      Pingo 9 March 2018 03: 53
                      0
                      Your ducks, so it was clear, are in these American and German museums. Those that were generally made, and not just in dreams.
                      1. Snakebyte
                        Snakebyte 9 March 2018 09: 06
                        0
                        These ducks, which are "only in dreams," already in the amount of 250 airplanes flew 200 thousand hours in the armed forces of eight countries. During this time, public relations specialists of the Moscow Region, together with pseudo-patriots, who were waving to them, using hundreds of thousands of articles and millions of comments about unique Russian and shabby American equipment, developed in the USA computer technology on the American OS, an American browser on the American global network.
                        And if PR specialists expect to get the lifetime title of Heroes of the Country, then what are pseudo-patriots counting on?
                    2. Pingo
                      Pingo 9 March 2018 14: 23
                      0
                      How your soul hurts for the USA! Did you turn on the fool again? These two hundred irons are made on the basis of Soviet design, and their two-hundredth duck is not even in the museum, they hesitate when they pour tea or coffee on it.
                      You do not know about the fact that everything American-Israeli ended in 386 percent? What is it about software. It doesn’t matter, you will soon forget anyway.
                      1. Snakebyte
                        Snakebyte 10 March 2018 09: 38
                        0
                        Quote: Pingo
                        These two hundred irons are made on the basis of Soviet design

                        In addition to MO agitation, can you quote anything? Although it’s better to quote someone else’s, your own thoughts only disgrace you.
                        Quote: Pingo
                        You do not know about the fact that everything American-Israeli ended in 386 percent?

                        Come on. What did Intel, Microsoft, Google, and Apple move from the US?
                        However, what to speak with a pseudo-patriot who quotes MO agitation, but he himself cannot distinguish one plane from another.
                        Learn at least this, but don’t stop, then after 10 years you’ll understand why you cannot turn the Harrier into a supersonic one by simply pulling the nozzle into its tail.
                    3. Pingo
                      Pingo 10 March 2018 16: 24
                      0
                      What is written in your training manual of the State Department besides "MO agitation"?
                      Microsoft and Intel have been using the work of Russian programmers and chip designers since the 1990s.
                      That’s how it turns into supersonic, because its glider is designed for M = 1,3
                      1. Snakebyte
                        Snakebyte 11 March 2018 08: 41
                        0
                        Quote: Pingo
                        Microsoft and Intel have been using the work of Russian programmers and chip designers since the 1990s.

                        That is their original Russian name, like Raja Koduri.
                        Quote: Pingo
                        That’s how it turns into supersonic, because its glider is designed for M = 1,3

                        Burn on. However, what to expect from the "expert" confusing MiG and Su.
                    4. Pingo
                      Pingo 11 March 2018 09: 31
                      0
                      Have you ever heard of the original Russian Babayan and the "Hindu code"?
                      Did you go to the site of Ukroboronservis?
          2. Pingo
            Pingo 7 March 2018 18: 33
            0
            Mb Is it Belenko himself? Look at him at the beginning of the second page of comments that he writes about the "advanced" American museum equipment (with illustrations).
            In flight instructions, Americans are forbidden to engage in close maneuver combat with this interceptor above 11 thousand meters.
            1. Snakebyte
              Snakebyte 8 March 2018 07: 47
              0
              Quote: Pingo
              In flight instructions, Americans are forbidden to engage in close maneuver combat with this interceptor above 11 thousand meters.

              Even your only source of “knowledge” - Wikipedia, states that the maximum allowable overload is 5G. Thrust-weight ratio is also indicated there. The wing specific load is not difficult to calculate. Compare these figures with those of any NATO fighter. Although, I doubt that you need it.
              A distinctive feature of pseudo-patriots is the desire to prove with all their might that Russia is the birthplace of elephants. Instead of being proud of the real achievements of the country, which are many, they stubbornly prove their primacy in fictional areas.
              1. Pingo
                Pingo 8 March 2018 16: 54
                0
                Look at the indicated overloads there, for example, according to the Mirage. See what a practical ceiling is. See the description of the battles between the F-15 and the Syrian MiG-25, when the F-15 without accepting the battle at the height of the MiG immediately declined, and then it was not recruited.
                Quote: Snakebyte
                A distinctive feature of pseudo-patriots is the desire to prove with all their might that Russia is the birthplace of elephants. Instead of being proud of the real achievements of the country, which are many, they stubbornly prove their primacy in fictional areas.

                Poor thing, didn’t you understand that you had a fictitious (American) or unsuccessful (German)?
                1. Snakebyte
                  Snakebyte 8 March 2018 23: 38
                  0
                  Quote: Pingo
                  Look at the indicated overloads there, for example, according to the Mirage

                  I don’t have to look, I’ll say for memory - 9G at Mirage 2000. And what does the practical ceiling have to do with it? Or did you discover new laws of aerodynamics? So run run for the Nobel Prize in physics.
                  Quote: Pingo
                  See the description of the battles between the F-15 and the Syrian MiG-25, when the F-15 without accepting the battle at the height of the MiG immediately declined, and then it was not recruited.

                  Where to see? In the MO agitators, who persistently insist that the MiG-25 failed the F-15? Presenting evidence from the agency OBS as evidence.
                  1. Pingo
                    Pingo 9 March 2018 03: 55
                    0
                    Then tell me the memory for other Mirages, since I looked. Look at the practical ceiling for the Su-25. Since you live with the Israeli-Israeli propaganda that not a single F-15 was shot down, what does the practical ceiling have to explain to you for a very long time. Even through their flight instructions, where you were immediately sent.
                    1. Snakebyte
                      Snakebyte 9 March 2018 09: 12
                      0
                      Is this “flight instruction” taken from the same place as the rest of the “knowledge” —from own fantasies seasoned with MO agitators?
                      Ceiling of the Su-25? And what makes these 7000 meters special? It is clear why the Americans should decline, but the enemy cannot even overpower 10000 laughing
                      1. Pingo
                        Pingo 9 March 2018 14: 21
                        0
                        Congratulations, you have surpassed yourself in your fantasies. And now take your head out of Wikipedia and put on that ceiling, if not in the flight instructions, at least on the Ukroboronservis website.
              2. Pingo
                Pingo 8 March 2018 17: 09
                0
                The distinctive ability of liberoids to grab any anti-Soviet or Russophobian branchy cranberries that Lockheed palms under their nose.
                Mb and the motherland is a mammoth in a species tree closer to the Indian elephant than the African elephant. Weighed as both of these combined. You didn't know that either? Hehe ...
                1. Snakebyte
                  Snakebyte 8 March 2018 23: 43
                  0
                  The pseudo-patriot is capable only of patriotic propaganda of the Moscow Patriarchate. Any information that contradicts them is immediately rejected as not fitting into the primitive picture of the world with Russia - the birthplace of elephants.
                  Talk further with your brothers Soho and Concher, I do not remember how it is there. Stand each other.
                  1. Pingo
                    Pingo 9 March 2018 03: 56
                    0
                    A true patriot, of course, should not yet watch RT because this is all Russian propaganda.
                    you and the fact that the Siberian mammoth is an elephant did not understand and immediately forgot.
      2. Staros
        Staros 8 March 2018 08: 52
        0
        Clarification is for BM. The deformation was not a glider but a problem with glazing. He was replaced.
        1. Pingo
          Pingo 8 March 2018 17: 12
          0
          BM is not the MiG-31? He is now not the fastest type of aircraft, but the only one.
  12. Victor Alexandrov
    Victor Alexandrov 8 March 2018 12: 12
    0
    1,5 thousand is far from the fastest
  13. Snakebyte
    Snakebyte 10 March 2018 09: 31
    0
    Pingo,
    First, learn to distinguish the interceptor of KB Mikoyan from the attack aircraft of KB Sukhoi, then you can already puff out your cheeks.
    1. Pingo
      Pingo 10 March 2018 16: 25
      0
      Did you just notice it now? Or is it that the raguli think that attack aircraft should not fly high even in the mountains?
      1. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte 11 March 2018 08: 43
        0
        I have long noticed that you will not distinguish Spirit from Flyer-1.
        I was wondering when you yourself will notice it. It seems like never.
        1. Pingo
          Pingo 11 March 2018 09: 32
          0
          Can you list all 45 presidents from memory?
          You taught it in vain. I have long noticed that you are even exceptional among them.
  14. Lucy
    Lucy 11 March 2018 22: 00
    0
    Quote: Snakebyte
    He can give 3M;

    And what does the thrust-weight ratio have to do with it? Mig-21bis has it more, and in the Czech Republic it is 1, so what.
    1. Pingo
      Pingo 13 March 2018 00: 17
      0
      Quote: Snakebyte
      Spirit from Flyer 1.

      distinguishes and that is good.