The Republic of Kazakhstan has signed a treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons.

59
The Republic of Kazakhstan decided to accede to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear weapons. The document was signed by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the UN, Kairat Umarov.





This is a document that was adopted in July last year. Initially, the readiness to support the “nuclear-free” initiative was expressed around the 130 countries of the world, but in the end it turned out that the document was signed by the 56 states. The ratification of the treaty has been carried out at the moment only in five countries of the world.

Press office Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan:
The President (of Kazakhstan) noted that the nuclear powers bear the highest responsibility to humanity for the prevention of a nuclear catastrophe. It is the major nuclear powers that should be at the head of the struggle for a nuclear-free world, to set an example of the reduction of WMD. This does not mean that the rest of the countries should stand aside, and that little depends on them. On the other hand, if the great nuclear powers insist on maintaining their nuclear status and improving their weapons, while prohibiting the acquisition of nuclear weapons by other countries, this will not lead to positive results. Therefore, I urge to make joint efforts in this direction.


Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, commenting on the initiative to ban nuclear weapons, noted that the Russian Federation shares the task of building a nuclear-free world, but emphasizes that all members of the “nuclear” club should share this task. While such a unity of positions is not visible.

In the expert community, the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was called populism - at the level of the prohibition of any weapon with a view to "world peace."
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    3 March 2018 14: 15
    Well, Elbasy correctly joined, because he would never solve this issue. laughing
    1. +24
      3 March 2018 14: 16
      Put the signature in Latin? smile
      1. +16
        3 March 2018 14: 23
        Deficient populism under the USA from the leaders of Kazakhstan carries, already, per kilometer.
        In the expert community, the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was called populism - at the level of the prohibition of any weapon with a view to "world peace."
        1. +15
          3 March 2018 15: 14
          The usual attempt to sit on two, while Yelbasy has three chairs, there are Chinese Maoists nearby, who without the Russian Federation will devour the RK and not choke, but in Latin, this demarche, etc., are jealous of the new cosmodrome, a transport route from Europe to the Asia-Pacific region, bypassing Kazakhstan, like railway, auto and the Northern Sea Route, the Power of Siberia that Putin set up. However, Kazakhstan is still in the Collective Security Treaty Organization, with a common air defense sky, i.e. under the protection of that same nuclear umbrella laughing which provides statehood of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Therefore, Elbasy can be criticized, but the main thing he understands and does, which is beneficial to Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation. He also did not allow a color revolution in the republic and remains the oldest and only ruler of the collapse of the USSR. And the Latin ... well, is that really important?
          1. +6
            3 March 2018 15: 19
            SweaterhstanTSY can sign a treaty banning koumiss. good
            There will be more sense.

            When will they come up with a Latin name?
            If they switched to the Latin alphabet, it’s time to call ourselves a thread in Latin. It is not worth using the Russian word "stan" to call a Latin country laughing .
            And all the more so since there are neither Cossacks nor a Cossack camp or a Cossack stop there. All this is in the past. love
            1. +8
              3 March 2018 16: 04
              And one more question. When will the Kirghiz demand from the Kazakhs the return of "their" land?
              After 17 years, these "Kazakh" territories were called KirghizStan. About the Turks and TurkStan silent. lol
              And if in 36 Stalin did not decide to create a union republic of Kazakhstan, then we would now listen to the stories of some sort of Kyrgyz president about the antiquity of the Kyrgyz state and the many millions of years of ownership of these lands by the Kyrgyz people.

              But in order to avoid such questions from the “indigenous” population, the alphabet needs to be changed. As a result, after a couple of generations, "true Kazakh" cannot read Mascals literature. And he will know about stochitelny Kazakhstan.

              Thank God that Orenburg was "transferred" to the RSFSR. Otherwise, the song that Zykina sang "Orenburg Downy Scarf" would be an ancient Kazakh epic. wassat

              But if all these territories remained autonomous republics within the RSFSR, then more of the country would be ours now.
              These are the "antiquities".

              Why not join a nuclear-free club?
              1. 0
                3 March 2018 17: 10
                Quote: Vladimir16
                And one more question. When will the Kirghiz demand from the Kazakhs the return of "their" land?

                do we need it? another shaming fire ...
          2. +2
            3 March 2018 15: 43
            Quote: hrych
            an attempt to sit on two, while Elbasy has three chairs,

            What else can he do? Objectively, he retains power only because he always defends the interests of foreign investors from the USA, China and Russia, who are very profitable to have enormous resources, corrupt power and impoverished labor. In Russia, before the sanctions, the situation was similar. Only with the tightening of Western sanctions and the election of the President make politicians do something for the people. It is a pity that in a month everyone will forget about their election promises. The Kazakh people, too, before the election for six months or even a year as "cheese in oil skated" due to artificial retention of the exchange rate.
            1. +1
              4 March 2018 00: 24
              In Kazakhstan, economic crises are three times more likely than in Russia.
          3. 0
            3 March 2018 15: 57
            Quote: hrych
            And the Latin ... well, is that really important?

            There, one of Koreiko’s comrades-in-arms “Hercules” translated into Latin, if memory serves. With this move, Elbasy resolved all sorts of misunderstandings compared to Koreiko regarding the transfer of the Republic of Kazakhstan as well as Hercules into Latin. Surely the works of Ilf with Petrov in Kazakh in Latin will not be translated.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +6
        3 March 2018 14: 28
        In their 90s, translators from Russian into Kazakh were introduced at enterprises .. Not all Kazakhs knew Kazakh there .. Well now the deflection will be counted, Maybe the Vatican will open the embassy ..
        Quote: Thrall
        Put the signature in Latin? smile
        1. +3
          3 March 2018 14: 54
          Quote: 210ox
          Maybe the Vatican will open an embassy ..

          maybe even the Papuans laughing
        2. +1
          3 March 2018 19: 51
          In their 90s, translators from Russian into Kazakh were introduced at enterprises

          it was like that, though they were not called translators, but like teachers. they all chased everyone to the Kazakh lessons, though it didn’t hurt, it helped, and then completely disappeared
        3. +1
          4 March 2018 10: 31
          Quote: 210ox
          In their 90s, translators from Russian into Kazakh were introduced at enterprises .. There, not all Kazakhs knew Kazakh then ..

          At the beginning of the 90s, we began to translate the Armed Forces manuals into Kazakh, but did not translate them at all, everything in Russian worked out. So they left. laughing
          1. 0
            4 March 2018 13: 51
            Charters of the armed forces in two languages.
      3. +2
        3 March 2018 15: 17
        Perhaps in the litinitsa "elbasy" does not sound so obscene
    2. +9
      3 March 2018 14: 17
      Nuclear weapons are the best guarantee of peace on Earth.
      1. +4
        3 March 2018 14: 25
        Quote: dorz
        Nuclear weapons are the best guarantee of peace on Earth.

        And rightly so! hi
        In the expert community itself the treaty banning nuclear weapons called populism - at the level of prohibition of any weapon for the purpose of "world peace."
    3. +7
      3 March 2018 14: 25
      Kazakhstan will still show itself "in all its glory" as an adversary of Russia, they do not remember the good. Great Russia preserved these ethnic groups, created industry for them and donated land.
      1. +3
        3 March 2018 14: 30
        Quote: Ancestors from the Don
        Kazakhstan will still show itself "in all its glory" as an adversary of Russia, they do not remember the good. Great Russia preserved these ethnic groups, created industry for them and donated land.

        Dude Tony has been helping them with this for a long time .. Well, Kazakhs!

        Nazarbayev whale tyk and it all starts men! soldier
        1. +3
          3 March 2018 14: 57
          And Semipalatinsk with Baikonur will return to their native harbor!) drinks
    4. +7
      3 March 2018 14: 33
      And who would not sign one who has no nuclear weapons? However, they themselves trade in uranium over a hill. winked
      1. +3
        3 March 2018 14: 55
        Quote: siberalt
        However, they themselves trade in uranium over a hill.

        so this is for a peaceful atom laughing
      2. +1
        3 March 2018 15: 23
        Quote: siberalt
        And who would not sign one who has no nuclear weapons? However, they themselves trade in uranium over a hill. winked

        Kazakhs have uranium .. This is alarming! negative
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          4 March 2018 00: 28
          ..and no brains, and it calms. There, after the departure of the Russians, there were no specialists at all; after uni in 1997, we were invited by both Kyrgyz and Kazakh countries. Right now, maybe they already have their own personnel, but then they had problems.
      3. +1
        3 March 2018 15: 39
        As mentioned in the article - "in the expert community, the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was called populism." In this case, the correct wording.
        Yes, and about the very concept of "contract" is also not clear. A contract or a declaration? The contract must be with someone. Who are the parties to the contract? Who are these great sides - Kazakhstan, Nigeria and Latvia? With whom did they agree, among themselves?
        Something like an agreement to ban whales from swimming on the territory of Mongolia.
    5. +1
      3 March 2018 15: 58
      And why did he need this, Kazakhstan is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, they understand very well under whose nuclear umbrella they are.
  2. +4
    3 March 2018 14: 16
    Well, this is their decision. I think that a nuclear-free status in the event of a mess will not save anyone.
  3. +1
    3 March 2018 14: 18
    All this is good if yes ALL, but it is from the category of utopia.
  4. +4
    3 March 2018 14: 18
    For all the good versus all the bad wassat After the GDP spoke about the PROTECTION OF ALLIES, Kazakhstan emboldened and signed an agreement to ban nuclear weapons. Yes, God will judge them ... Time will show where all this will lead.
    1. +1
      3 March 2018 15: 13
      We are for allies, only allies for both ours and yours.
  5. +2
    3 March 2018 14: 27
    Signed and correctly, if only it would not work out, the placement thereof by "well-wishers" from across the ocean - it will become with them.
  6. +8
    3 March 2018 14: 31
    Well, why not sign an impracticable agreement that does not oblige to anything? For what an important international step an independent and democratic country is taking !!!!! laughing
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      3 March 2018 14: 55
      Quote: Thracian Warrior
      Putin signed?

      you will not wait
  8. +7
    3 March 2018 14: 54
    Gaddafi and Saddam send greetings to all those who are against nuclear weapons.
  9. +15
    3 March 2018 15: 17
    The Republic of Kazakhstan has signed a treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons.

    then the fate of Ukraine will follow
  10. 0
    3 March 2018 15: 22
    yeah .... if all sorts of igil, and so on. they will trample from Afghanistan, where they are mobilizing now, who will defend the Kazakhs. The signing of this, at this moment when the support of a neighbor is required .... the bend smells. Watering now all those who do not have nuclear weapons
  11. -1
    3 March 2018 15: 26
    Signed under pressure, fact. Just a question by pushing someone. Hope joint Russia and mattresses. For the unexploded test charge in the mountains subway in the 90s, only the lazy did not write. And for tactical charges they really have enough there.
  12. 0
    3 March 2018 15: 29
    In the process of fishing and hunting, Kazakhs no longer get off ..!
    I have long felt that Tony is not in vain for the Kazakhs to spud ...
    Nazarbayev is already signing heh heh
    The authorities there need to be changed urgently!
  13. +3
    3 March 2018 15: 35
    Indians voted to ban revolvers and guns ....
  14. +1
    3 March 2018 15: 49
    This means that in the event of a worsening foreign policy situation, but with the development of the CSTO, Russia will not be able to deploy nuclear weapons at distant approaches in response to the deployment of the US. but the Americans will be able to.
  15. +1
    3 March 2018 15: 53
    Well, where are the forum users Kazakhs ..? Where are the swamps ...
  16. +2
    3 March 2018 16: 14
    Signed by those who do not shine to play in this sandbox.
  17. +3
    3 March 2018 17: 04
    The Republic of Kazakhstan decided to accede to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons


    when you have neither nuclear weapons, nor science capable of ever creating it, and most importantly, steel eggs, in order to bring it to life you can sign anything.
    Besides the attempt of the authorities of Kazakhstan to lick this “civilizational” western ass with this signing, this signing does not make any sense.
    The West refers to the peoples of Eastern Europe as second-class people who are suitable for the role of cannon fodder and Asians for them at the level of dirt under the nails. And the more you lick the American ass, the more they are convinced that they correctly consider you dirt.
    1. +2
      3 March 2018 18: 00
      BN-350 in Aktau. Actually, there are 5 research reactors in KZ. The one near Alma-Ata now works for medicine, industry, and science. There is still in Kurchatov.
      A nuclear fuel center has been set up in the Republic of Kazakhstan. It takes the 1st place in the world in uranium mining (by reserve it is in the top three). Processed raw materials - hake - we sell in Russia and China, for example. In the Russian Federation, it is enriched and returns to the Ulba met. combine. We get pills and ship to the Russian Federation, where they make TVELs. Kazatomprom owns a stake in the American Westinghouse, and enriches the Russian ones. enterprises. Kazatomprom revenues were above $ 2 billion. hi
      1. +1
        3 March 2018 21: 01
        Quote: Kasym
        Processed raw materials - hake - we sell in the Russian Federation and China

      2. +2
        3 March 2018 21: 09
        Quote: Kasym
        Processed raw materials - hake - we sell in Russia and China, for example. In the Russian Federation, it is enriched and returns to the Ulba met. plant

        hake belay
        pitch - probably more correct wink
        1. +1
          4 March 2018 20: 12
          Uranium ore - uranium hake - they also say "yellow hake". hi
      3. 0
        4 March 2018 00: 52
        but KZ will not make a bomb, this is slightly different (to put it mildly) than tablets for fuel elements using Soviet technologies.
        1. +1
          4 March 2018 20: 08
          He taught Iranian students at the Faculty of Physics, subsequently studied at the Department of Atom. physical .. By the way, at your recommendation they were sent to us.
          The French, Canadians, Japanese and Americans worked closely with Kazatomprom - "You have a very developed nuclear industry, and the new production technology is the most advanced, which you have developed."
          Why do we need this bomb? We give you 1000 poison. warheads with carriers passed in the 90s, after the collapse.
  18. +1
    3 March 2018 19: 13
    The Republic of Kazakhstan has signed a treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons.

  19. 0
    3 March 2018 22: 10
    This is good, that means they are hoping for us.
  20. +2
    3 March 2018 22: 37
    The EU countries and the NATO bloc have not signed and are not going to. The US plans to set up bases for everyone. The base involves the deployment of AMERICAN nuclear weapons. Germany, Poland, Turkey and Romania - the first to accept
  21. 0
    4 March 2018 13: 06
    In the expert community, the agreement on the prohibition of nuclear weapons was called populism - at the level of prohibition of any weapon for the purpose of "world peace"


    And what is wrong with "world peace"? Of course, it’s kind of a little naive, but that doesn’t mean that you don’t have to strive for it at least somehow
  22. +1
    4 March 2018 13: 08
    Quote: Ancestors from the Don
    Kazakhstan will still show itself "in all its glory" as an adversary of Russia, they do not remember the good. Great Russia preserved these ethnic groups, created industry for them and donated land.

    And why is this dregs? Kazakhstan is a friendly state.
    1. +2
      4 March 2018 13: 36
      Quote: Mentat
      Kazakhstan is a friendly state.

      it remains to find out to whom
  23. 0
    4 March 2018 13: 50
    It’s interesting, but before whom they caved in ...
  24. 0
    4 March 2018 14: 06
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    Quote: Mentat
    Kazakhstan is a friendly state.

    it remains to find out to whom

    Of Russia. In another form, foreign virtues simply will not allow him to exist. An example of Ukraine and Syria before our eyes. Central Asia never entered the "inner circle" of the Anglo-Saxons. You need to take a sober look at things. At the slightest opportunity, they will arrange the pumping out of resources and another buffer zone of the humanitarian catastrophe, so that Russia burns as much as possible near by. If Kazakhstan, God forbid, blazes, everything will be much worse there than in Ukraine.
    Do you think the Kazakhs do not understand this? Then why kindle, it is not clear.
    1. +1
      4 March 2018 22: 21
      Quote: Mentat
      Russia.

      Yes, it does not seem so far
      Quote: Mentat
      In another form, foreign virtues simply will not allow him to exist.

      Do you really think that the government is interested in this ?!
      Quote: Mentat
      Do you think the Kazakhs do not understand this?

      you do not understand
      Quote: Mentat
      Then why kindle, it is not clear.

      what kindle ?!
  25. 0
    5 March 2018 01: 59
    About the ban on nuclear weapons in Kazakhstan? At this time, all sovereign states are trying to acquire such weapons. There is such a state "Ukraine": they refused - now they are very sorry.
  26. 0
    6 March 2018 11: 35
    ** It is the largest nuclear powers that should be at the head of the struggle for a nuclear-free world, to show an example of WMD reduction. **
    But for this to happen, it is urgent to reform the NPT, which is now essentially the main incentive for the nuclear race. And just Nazarbayev recently tried to do this, proposing to legalize all the actual nuclear powers. If they are accepted into a nuclear club with non-proliferation obligations, then it will be possible to talk about something; no, sorry.