Military Review

Disarmed States of America

240
Some key questions inspired by the message of Vladimir Putin


Disarmed States of America


1 question. Does the information of Vladimir Putin about the newest models of strategic weapons Russia?

Answer: Corresponds fully and exactly to the extent that is designated by the President of Russia. In the case of Vladimir Putin, who has already become historical a world-class personality, one thing can definitely be said - he never fell and will not go down to a banal, momentary lie. Because it values ​​too much its state position and place in history. If Putin had Poroshenko in place of Putin, I would not have given a penny for the authenticity of his "amazing stories." But here is something completely different. Exchange for a primitive muhlezh, whose lifespan is, by force, a couple of months, a figure of such a scale as Putin will definitely not. That is, all that he said is true.


2 Question: Why was the newest weapon of Russia represented mainly in the form of computer animation, and not documentary filming? Is this not proof of fraud?

No, not proof. Putin himself explained why. The shown complexes are the most advanced in the world and therefore absolutely secret. Even that small part of specific information about them, which was voiced by the president, was also secret until that moment, and it was opened to the general public for very important reasons. The main one among which is by no means the upcoming elections, but new unprecedented military threats to Russia from the United States. Washington adopted a new nuclear doctrine a month ago, in which the conditions and extent of the use of nuclear weapons are extremely blurred. Up to nuclear strikes for preventive purposes. when someone in the US seems to need it.

Russia categorically did not like it. And Putin directly warned that any games with a lowering of the nuclear threshold will only lead to a reciprocal full-scale strike on the aggressor from Russia.
It was with the fact that in the West no one doubted that such a devastating blow would inevitably be demonstrated and weapon systems that could turn the American missile defense system into useless trash.


3 Question: Who is the new Russian strategic weapon directed against?

Answer: The demonstration of the new military capabilities of Russia has one and very clear addressee. This is the USA. Putin’s entire presentation of the latest weapons systems was structured in such a way that no one has any doubts - Russia does not consider Europe as its potential military opponent. The source of global instability in Moscow is considered by the United States and impose on America only those weapons that by their main parameters - range, speed and maneuverability leave no doubt that their targets are objects in the States.

For Russia, it is clearly redundant to create cruise missiles with a nuclear engine and an unlimited range for the bombing of its European neighbors. The same applies to the ICBM "Sarmat" capable of attacking the United States from the South Pole and in general - from anywhere. Deep-sea nuclear drones are also clearly not the weapon, without which it is impossible to do in a European war. But the American coast completely built up by cities on two oceans is a target almost perfect for such super-torpedoes.
Thus, although Putin did not say it out loud, he made it clear that Moscow does not put an equal sign between Europe and the United States and expects the Europeans to understand and appreciate this.

Moreover, the clear distinction shown by the President of the Russian Federation between the United States and the more near West is a fundamental principle of the Russian global strategy, which is still based on the concept of Greater Europe - from the Atlantic to the Urals, with as much overseas influence as possible. The fact that Moscow, even after four years of Western sanctions and NATO’s advance to the East, emphasizes this distinction and even makes it the basis of its military-strategic planning, shows that Russia is still confident that its European stake is the only correct one.


4 Question: How can you assess the world reaction to the speech of Vladimir Putin?

Answer: First and foremost is, of course, a feeling of complete and general confusion. Shock and Awe. The degree of surprise is exactly the same as in the cases with the first Soviet atomic bomb, the first Soviet artificial satellite of the Earth and the first Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. The West once again completely failed in its forecasts and estimates regarding Russia.

The confusion is so great that the first persons of the modern West, Donald Trump and Angela Merkel, did not consider it shameful to quit all current affairs and devote a separate telephone conversation to the discussion of Putin’s message. Does anyone doubt that two world leaders would hardly have discussed the words of any foreign politician on such an emergency basis?
There is one explanation - they are not childishly penetrated. I won’t be surprised if in the coming days there will be extremely tough conclusions regarding the top leadership of American intelligence. Who today can weave anything in his defense, to the extent that Putin had a dream in a dream. But the fact remains that yesterday they had no idea about all this. Because, if they had, they would certainly ring the whole world about Russia's aggressive intentions. Flushed completely.

The reason why this happened is absolutely obvious to me. This is still the same incurable Western arrogance, monstrous and unreasonable self-confidence in its own exclusivity and unwillingness on this unhealthy soil to seriously engage in a possible opponent.

It was at this time that Hitler, who at the end of the war bitterly regretted that he had no idea about the real military and economic capabilities of the USSR, got burned. It is not too late for the West to learn for itself. And learn, finally, to respect the rest of the world. Otherwise, he cannot avoid new surprises, some of which may well prove to be lethal for him.

5 Question: What will Western leaders do in the light of the revelations he has revealed about Russia's military capabilities?

They will do what they always did. The West is considered only with strength and is ready to respect only a strong opponent. Russia has demonstrated its strength and can make it more convincing, if necessary. The West will definitely have to make adjustments to its policy. While its leaders are in traumatic shock and can only staggered at their concern about this, dumbfounded.

But this is not the currency that is quoted in global geopolitics. The West, of course, also does not sew. And certainly try to act in the usual way. That is, to oppose the strength of an even greater force. And, thereby, save yourself from having to make substantial concessions to Russia.

But this time he may have problems with it. And the matter is not even the lack of appropriate technologies for him - this is a new business. And the fact that the new Russian weapons are irreversible, at least for the foreseeable future, negates the strategic invulnerability of the US territory. Which the Americans very much hoped to provide at the expense of their global missile defense umbrella. Now it is clear - this rate is a bit.

And consequently all American plans to launch a disarming strike on Russia, after which they themselves hoped to remain unpunished, are crumbling to hell. Now the "otvetka" in full growth will overtake them in any case.

And from this it follows that the entire American strategy of creating decisive military superiority over the Russian Federation goes down the drain and can no longer be regarded as an effective means of achieving American geopolitical goals. Where they had recently counted on the complete neutralization of the enemy, now there is nothing to hope for. And, therefore, we should be talking, no less, about changing the entire geopolitical concept of the United States, as such. And this is not a single day, or even one month. So, in the near future, American governing minds will surely fall into deep thought and will painfully think - how can they arrange everything so that they have everything and they don’t have anything for it.

I think that during this period they will be categorically incapable of making any far-reaching and risky decisions.

6 Question: How did Putin do all this?

Answer: The components of Vladimir Putin’s personality for me, as he is almost the same age and a colleague in the same army, do not constitute a special secret. This is a normal patriot of his homeland still Soviet ferment, able to organize things exactly as he was taught in the profession. For any security officer, ensuring the secrecy of their plans, the progress of their implementation, and the creation of a surprise effect for the enemy is the cornerstone. And the Russian leader in these sciences clearly succeeded. He managed to make the whole world think about Russia and its capabilities a bit differently than it really is. In this, he was greatly helped by the still-preserved traditions and the most experienced cadres of the once most closed country in the world, who perfectly mastered all the technologies of closing state special events of any scale and complexity.

It was these particular technologies of absolute secrecy that accompanied the Soviet space program at one time, which allowed the Soviet Union to regularly drive Americans into a complete stupor.

In the post-Soviet period, something similar was used to ensure the secrecy of large-scale resuscitation and the renewal of the Russian army. The necessity of which was dictated by the well-known military-political weakness of Russia of the early 2000-s. As part of this special operation, the defiantly minister-furniture maker was brought to the forefront of events. And then it turned out that the entire clearing of the army "Augean stables" was carried out precisely at this notorious "taburetkin", which became a kind of lightning conductor of "unpopular measures."

And most importantly, almost all the contracts for the production of the latest Russian weapons systems, which surprise the whole world today, were concluded precisely under him. Do not believe it - read the list of weapons systems contracted by the Minister in my previous article on this topic: https://news-front.info/2015/11/21/who-is-mister-serdyukov-yurij-selivanov/?utm_referrer= https% 3a% 2f% 2fwww.google.com% 2f

A new army is not born in one day, or even in one year. And when already, under the new minister, she suddenly began “giving out on the mountain” a surprise after a surprise from the Crimea to Syria, it finally became clear that everything had begun long before that.
The use of the same combination of external distracting noise effects (for example, through the same noisy and confused liberal media) and intense, purposeful work in the opposite direction, away from prying eyes and with the obligatory surprise of the Gagarin scale at the end, apparently, became the key to success and the current strategic program. And Putin said about this in his message almost without reserve:

“This is the result of the efforts of dozens of institutes, scientific organizations, and design offices. OVER THIS, QUIETLY, HUMBLELY, WITHOUT ANY LOVE, WITH COMPLETE RETURN OF THE FORCES AND DURING FOR A MANY YEARS OF WORKING BY THOUSANDS OF OUR SPECIALISTS. ”


It remains to add that the technologies of ensuring the regime of full secrecy of the defense activities of a strategic level were developed and brought to absolute perfection in the Stalinist Soviet Union. And thank God that these technologies were not lost on the way. For it is far from a fact that our Western "partners" would allow Russia to do this in an absolutely open and transparent manner. But what Putin and his associates have done is by no means a lie, the impossibility of which at this level was told by me at the very beginning. But this is undoubtedly a military ruse, without which it is impossible to win any war. Even in a hybrid like this.
Author:
240 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 March 2018 06: 45
    +17
    Once again, the West has completely failed in its forecasts and assessments regarding Russia.

    And oh, how dear, in the literal and figurative sense of the word, it will cost him. Hacked the hostages on the tonsils! angry
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 3 March 2018 06: 50
      +17
      Yeah, face on the asphalt. Also calmly fend off their attacks, they like this oh how they do not like.
      1. Tatar 174
        Tatar 174 3 March 2018 07: 51
        +8
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        Yeah, face on the asphalt.

        If they do not understand the other, then how else? That's right, only in the face and only on the asphalt or on the table, all one, but if you had to do so, they should realize that they have gone too far with both their missile defense and NATO expansion, and with declaring themselves exceptional and many more to others. In addition to everything else, I really liked what the GDP said about the protection of the Allies, now many should think which chair to choose from two, well, not to sit on two)))
        1. 210ox
          210ox 3 March 2018 09: 12
          +7
          The situation with nuclear-powered rockets is interesting. According to their purpose and specifics of operation, they can only be launched in a nuclear conflict where everything is clear and there will be no winners. The operation of these engines leads to radiation infection. The question is where and how to test this technique.
          1. Vladimir16
            Vladimir16 3 March 2018 12: 12
            +11
            Quote: 210ox
            The operation of these engines leads to radiation contamination.

            The operation of a nuclear power plant does not lead to infection.
            Test technology will not tell us. I think this process is secret.
            They could make the work of the NPP safe. So here they were able to solve this problem.
            The main thing is that the mattresses are out of reach and their missile defense will not help them.

            I wonder when such engines will be in aviation. When for airplanes the main cargo will cease to be kerosene. Many tons of kerosene.

            That's where we are moving.
            1. meandr51
              meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 28
              +2
              I agree. In addition, on the radioactive trail, perhaps you can track the trajectory from space. They got rid of him. And you can run it whenever you want. True, after undermining warheads, contamination of the area is inevitable.
              1. 17085
                17085 3 March 2018 14: 22
                +3
                Quote: meandr51
                I agree. In addition, on the radioactive trail, perhaps you can track the trajectory from space. They got rid of him. And you can run it whenever you want. True, after undermining warheads, contamination of the area is inevitable.


                Quote: 210ox
                The situation with nuclear-powered rockets is interesting. According to their purpose and specifics of operation, they can only be launched in a nuclear conflict where everything is clear and there will be no winners. The operation of these engines leads to radiation infection. The question is where and how to test this technique.


                Before you wrote this stupidity, you would google ... Wikipedia wrote for you ...
                1. Vladimir16
                  Vladimir16 3 March 2018 15: 24
                  +7
                  Quote: 17085
                  Before you wrote this stupidity, you would google ... Wikipedia wrote for you ..

                  Is it really written in your wikipedia about a new weapon? what
                  Where did the Westerners and their presidents and chancellors look? Why were they waiting for Putin's speech? I had to ask Wikipedia! wassat
                  And Putin also read on Wikipedia? I read in the evening and, well, make rockets. In the country, secretly. laughing wassat
            2. Partyzan
              Partyzan 3 March 2018 15: 21
              +3
              Quote: Vladimir16
              I wonder when such engines will be in aviation.

              I’m wondering how they could put a reactor into a diameter of 30 cm?
              1. Vladimir16
                Vladimir16 3 March 2018 16: 36
                +5
                There are many new things. But only in the coming years, how it all works and who did it will not be told to us.
                Thanks to the engineers and workers.
            3. nikon7717
              nikon7717 4 March 2018 00: 50
              +2
              Do nuclear submarines go under water? Yes! also secretly? Yes!
              And here the problem was to reduce the reactor to a size of 400 mm. steam generator created. and all convert the extension into electricity or into a turbine right away!
              For such a reactor, materials are necessary and the layout scheme is basic. So done. well done! Heroes of Russia are scientists! Glory!
              when will they be declassified only? here they need to give the Nobel Prizes!
          2. dog breeder
            dog breeder 3 March 2018 12: 16
            +5
            So this is stated. "Sit still, breathe deeper" This is not a weapon of aggression.
            1. your1970
              your1970 3 March 2018 14: 52
              +5
              I always had the feeling that Taburetkin was a cover for serious things. Despite all the mistakes and punctures ...
              1. Partyzan
                Partyzan 3 March 2018 15: 23
                +4
                Quote: your1970
                I always had the feeling that Taburetkin was a cover for serious things. Despite all the mistakes and punctures ...

                so he went as a witness, obviously for a reason, the amounts were much more than Ulyukaev’s
              2. max702
                max702 4 March 2018 00: 30
                +2
                Quote: your1970
                I always had the feeling that Taburetkin was a cover for serious things. Despite all the mistakes and punctures ...

                Soon they will say so about Chubais ...
              3. dauria
                dauria 4 March 2018 02: 53
                +4
                I always had the feeling that "Taburetkin" was a cover figure


                Exactly ... And Vasilyeva is the radio operator Kat. Hero Star to her .. laughing
                Aw, people !!! So easy to let yourself go? This is a clear attempt to "write off" the blunder of rulers, passing it off as a wise plan. Moreover, this pearl is "issued" not by Putin, but by his admirer, a certain Selivanov.
                1. your1970
                  your1970 5 March 2018 10: 20
                  +1
                  those. there is dipping Serdyukov into the product of vital activity of France - as a state incapable to fulfill their obligations on the supply of weapons and in direct proportion to the Zaluzhi on any issue (especially on the supply of weapons) is a trifle .... belay
                  about supplies that could initially be subject to and / or subject to sanctions - France has now also fallen from the cage

                  Z.Y. If you forgot - we got technologies (which we didn’t have in principle) and us still paid for it (fines) ....

                  Z.Z.Z. as if the generals in the army should be periodically "shaken up" - I have no doubts. And the fact that Taburetkin did it NOT methods 1935-37gg ....
              4. Midshipman
                Midshipman 4 March 2018 11: 34
                0
                And I always talked about this.
          3. amirbek
            amirbek 3 March 2018 12: 28
            +2
            Quote: 210ox
            The operation of these engines leads to radiation contamination. The question is where and how to test this technique.

            probably already experienced this technique and most likely over Europe and current measurements those seem to have not understood it yet ...
            Remember, for example, not so long ago in Europe, they swore about radiation ... bully
          4. Orionvit
            Orionvit 3 March 2018 13: 19
            +6
            Quote: 210ox
            The operation of these engines leads to radiation contamination.

            Yesterday I specially dug up an article on this issue. Unlike nuclear engines developed in the 50s, with the current state of technology, radioactive contamination from the operation of these products is not necessary. This is achieved through the use of heat exchangers of a special design and a strict calculation of the amount of nuclear fuel, which by the end of the flight, almost completely "burns out". Anyway, I am inclined to think that this is mostly from the realm of fantasy.
            1. nadezhiva
              nadezhiva 3 March 2018 13: 40
              +4
              Fiction is unlikely. Indeed, it is classified in full, but people are already showing the little things. Take a look at the developments of FSUE NII NPO Luch. Nuclear batteries, which were shown to the public at the IX international forum Atomexpo-2017. Funny little thing, so far, to hell, dear. But here, as always, is a matter of time.
              1. Orionvit
                Orionvit 3 March 2018 14: 24
                +2
                Quote: nadezhiva
                full secret But here, as always, a matter of time.

                We will see. Once again, from my point of view, this statement is designed for the average layman.
            2. udincev
              udincev 3 March 2018 16: 24
              0
              Quote: Orionvit
              Anyway, I am inclined to think that this is mostly from the realm of fantasy.

              Real fiction - cell phone and internet.
              1. Orionvit
                Orionvit 3 March 2018 17: 07
                +3
                Quote: udincev
                Real fiction - cell phone and internet.

                In the days of my youth, yes. laughing
          5. Ierarh
            Ierarh 4 March 2018 11: 25
            0
            Quote: 210ox
            The situation with nuclear-powered rockets is interesting. According to their purpose and specifics of operation, they can only be launched in a nuclear conflict where everything is clear and there will be no winners. The operation of these engines leads to radiation infection. The question is where and how to test this technique.

            No, it does not. Only if the fuel elements are destroyed. Powerful ionizing radiation from an unprotected reactor is different.
          6. Natalia777
            Natalia777 4 March 2018 17: 15
            +2
            NEWS: 04.03.2018/3/XNUMX. "Residents of several regions of the Ural Federal District noticed a dazzling meteor in the sky. Eyewitnesses managed to remove the fireball in the video. A meteorite flew over the Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk regions on the night of March XNUMX. According to residents of the Urals, a bright blue reflection was rapidly moving across the sky. ”
            I believe that this was not a car, but just the same demonstration of the new Russian Vanguard missile. She flies with a 10-fold excess of sound and creates a plasma cloud in front of her. Due to the high speed, the rocket itself is neither visible nor audible. Only the plasma cloud is visible. Let the United States look at what Russian weapons they now have to deal with.
      2. dauria
        dauria 4 March 2018 03: 23
        +9
        Yeah, face on the asphalt.


        Yes, cool down already. First of all, the speech is PRE-ELECTION. If the enemy were up to something, then not the press would be called, but an increased (military danger, complete) degree of combat readiness would be introduced. Then the guys from the Pentagon themselves they call the Kremlin and ask, "Are you serious?"
        And then here, Vasilyeva and Taburetkin were not punctured, but recorded as a plus sign. laughing And there are no such “jerks” and “lags”. Nuclear monopoly -4 years (since we were not up to the bomb in the 42-45th) Sputnik-months. The astronaut is also. Nostril to nostril always. The United States has all of this for sure. Worse, better - but there is.
        All this speech is primarily for our voters, and secondly for voters (crowds) in Europe and the USA. But not for specialists for sure.
    2. dog breeder
      dog breeder 3 March 2018 12: 19
      +7
      The author forgot to mention the local all-predators. They then flow around not childishly.
      Would local liberoids know this information, would they go to Trump for breakfast?
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 05
        +6
        Quote: dog breeder
        Local liberoids would know this information

        for general development: the development of a nuclear compact engine for the Kyrgyz Republic in Russia was carried out after the liberal Medvedev signed the necessary documents. Or is Medvedev not a liberal?
        1. businessv
          businessv 3 March 2018 16: 48
          +3
          Quote: Silvestr
          Or is Medvedev not a liberal?

          Full, his mother, a liberal!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Spnsr
      Spnsr 3 March 2018 22: 44
      +3
      The problem of Western intelligence is the focus on the Internet and social networks! Which, by their reaction, can be attributed to the main source of information for them!
  2. Geksagena
    Geksagena 3 March 2018 06: 54
    +17
    Yeah, make another hero out of Taburetkin. The Mistral did not come, but they are building new BDKs, military representatives have earned it under Shoigu, and divisions are being returned under Shoigu. And much and much. The rearmament of the army is the merit of three people, Putin, Rogozin and Shoigu. And liberals like Medvedev and his sidekick Taburetkin, the real Khrushchevites and traitors.
    1. yuriyselivanov
      3 March 2018 08: 53
      +3
      Why "make a hero"? A. Serdyukov - Hero of the Russian Federation. Did not know?
      1. egor-kz
        egor-kz 3 March 2018 12: 09
        0
        Quote: yuriyselivanov
        A. Serdyukov - Hero of the Russian Federation. Did not know?

        What is this terrible secret ?! Share the source of a respected Colleague?
        1. andj61
          andj61 3 March 2018 13: 17
          +1
          Quote: egor-kz
          Quote: yuriyselivanov
          A. Serdyukov - Hero of the Russian Federation. Did not know?

          What is this terrible secret ?! Share the source of a respected Colleague?

          Nezavisimaya Gazeta in 2014 reported that in a secret decree of President Medvedev in 2012 Serdyukov was awarded the title Hero. But then it was officially denied as absurd. So you should not re-run the long-standing info of NG - this is the usual speculation typical of liberal media. hi
          1. yuriyselivanov
            3 March 2018 20: 11
            +1
            "But then it was officially denied as absurd." Denial to the studio!
        2. yuriyselivanov
          3 March 2018 19: 18
          0
          http://www.ng.ru/armies/2014-02-10/3_kartblansh.h
          tml
    2. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 3 March 2018 08: 57
      +25
      Quote: Geksagena
      The rearmament of the army is the merit of three people, Putin, Rogozin and Shoigu. And liberals like Medvedev and his sidekick Taburetkin, the real Khrushchevites and traitors.

      Neither Rogozin nor Shoigu had anything to do with the beginning of the rearmament of the army! They were put in their posts after it became clear that the reform was underway: Rogozin - to oversee the ongoing rearmament, and Shoigu - to finish the reforms begun in the army. And all the dirty work was done by Serdyukov! Yes, with mistakes and excesses, but things have moved forward: cash flows went into the army, and not into the bottomless pockets of the general! And on this basis, the rearmament of the army and the construction of housing for the military began. I would look, where would the same Shoigu be, if instead of Serdyukov he would start raking these "Augean stables"! Serdyukov knew what he was going on: for the sake of restoring our army, he sacrificed his reputation. That is why he is free and still holds leadership positions. I am sure that over time, we will learn a lot about this topic.
      1. passing
        passing 3 March 2018 10: 08
        +20
        And all the dirty work was done by Serdyukov! Yes, with mistakes and excesses, but things have moved forward: cash flows went into the army, and not into the bottomless pockets of the general!

        Yes of course! And then Vasilyeva was substituted for the sake of the motherland!
        So that the corrupt generals would not steal people's money, she would take care and sin upon herself! Star of the hero Vasilyeva !!!!! And how much land does the military department return through the courts sold by Serdyukov?
        You are not accidentally from the sect of "witnesses to a good life under Putin," but you are trying to justify any of his actions.
        1. meandr51
          meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 33
          +4
          Otherwise, this work could not be done. An alternative is the Beria cleanings. Would you do that?
          Well, well .. And then they gave a couple to steal, they phoned about it all over the world. And they pressed the rest. This is done under capitalism. When Pete 1 was about the same.
        2. Orionvit
          Orionvit 3 March 2018 13: 26
          +8
          Quote: passing
          "witnesses to a good life under Putin"

          Sorry for the question, but you are a "witness" in general what? Well, vote for "your" candidate and you will be happy. Moreover, he promises everyone everything at once, as in a fairy tale. laughing
          1. passing
            passing 3 March 2018 14: 42
            +6
            Quote: Orionvit
            Quote: passing
            "witnesses to a good life under Putin"

            Sorry for the question, but you are a "witness" in general what? Well, vote for "your" candidate and you will be happy. Moreover, he promises everyone everything at once, as in a fairy tale. laughing

            unfortunately, in short, there are no candidates that inspire confidence in me.
            And if someone will objectively evaluate the year 2000, then he will understand that the improvement in life was associated with a change in the elite, some could not steal, others were still afraid.
            Therefore, I most likely will not go to the polls.
            yes, I forgot, your candidate defends the "elite" selling, thieving, elite.
            the standard of living of the rest of the population does not interest him
        3. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 3 March 2018 14: 39
          +8
          Quote: passing
          You are not accidentally from the sect of "witnesses to a good life under Putin," but you are trying to justify any of his actions.

          Are you passing? Well, that would go by, there is nothing to bully the "honest people"!
          1. passing
            passing 3 March 2018 14: 45
            +10
            Are you passing? Well, that would go by, there is nothing to bully the "honest people"!

            when there are no arguments, go to rudeness!
            These are the defenders of GDP, sectarians, in a word tongue
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 3 March 2018 14: 57
              +12
              Quote: passing
              when there are no arguments, go to rudeness!
              These are the defenders of GDP, sectarians, in a word

              My argument: the president of Russia was, is and will be another term - Putin V.V.! And you, all his opponents, at least kill yourself against the wall, but it won’t be your way! A sect can be called your bunch of opponents of Putin, but not us, supporters of the revival of Russia! Putin just leads our country to this! Where do you want to lead us?
              1. passing
                passing 3 March 2018 15: 07
                +14
                Quote: SRC P-15
                Quote: passing
                when there are no arguments, go to rudeness!
                These are the defenders of GDP, sectarians, in a word

                My argument: the president of Russia was, is and will be another term - Putin V.V.! And you, all his opponents, at least kill yourself against the wall, but it won’t be your way! A sect can be called your bunch of opponents of Putin, but not us, supporters of the revival of Russia! Putin just leads our country to this! Where do you want to lead us?

                Why do you, Putin’s supporters, associate yourself with the revival of Russia, is it time to start developing? But opponents of Putin, what is against the development of Russia?
                Enough to engage in demagogy, I think on this site the majority for the development of Russia. Only I think welfare growth should be for all citizens of the Russian Federation, and not for a handful of oligarchs and officials
                1. Winnie76
                  Winnie76 3 March 2018 15: 43
                  +3
                  Quote: passing
                  Why do you, Putin’s supporters, associate yourself with the revival of Russia, is it time to start developing? But opponents of Putin, what is against the development of Russia?

                  If the revival of Russia is not connected with Putin, then with whom? With Yeltsin or Gorbachev? Or maybe Chernenko or Brezhnev? Name sister, name ???
                  1. ans
                    ans 4 March 2018 21: 53
                    +3
                    Quote: Winnie76
                    Quote: passing
                    Why do you, Putin’s supporters, associate yourself with the revival of Russia, is it time to start developing? But opponents of Putin, what is against the development of Russia?

                    If the revival of Russia is not connected with Putin, then with whom? With Yeltsin or Gorbachev? Or maybe Chernenko or Brezhnev? Name sister, name ???

                    With your own mind and not with the gummy gum
                2. Setrac
                  Setrac 3 March 2018 23: 31
                  0
                  Quote: passing
                  Is it time to start developing?

                  And what should the "beginning of development" look like?
              2. twviewer
                twviewer 3 March 2018 15: 08
                +3
                leads with Medvedev, Kudrin, Chubais? Have a good trip.
                1. passing
                  passing 3 March 2018 16: 23
                  +9
                  Putin appointed Medvedev, Putin appointed Kudrin.
                  Chubais creature of Medvedev. The government of the Russian Federation allocates money from the budget to Chubais. GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Prime Minister Medvedev. Designates Putin.
                  What are you talking about?
                  You will get an education, at least secondary
                  1. twviewer
                    twviewer 3 March 2018 16: 55
                    +2
                    Hang up, this was written for the S-P P-15. But on the whole, arguing with him is useless, his last argument will be: but for me on the drum! Which rather means: that "I personally feel so good."
                    1. SRC P-15
                      SRC P-15 3 March 2018 18: 09
                      +7
                      Quote: twviewer
                      Hang up, this was written for the S-P P-15. But on the whole, arguing with him is useless, his last argument will be: but for me on the drum! Which rather means: that "I personally feel so good."

                      I feel good as much as possible for a retiree with 15 thousand. retirement. And besides, at the age of 62, I also work and don’t whine, as some do not wait for the manna from heaven! And then, I am at such an age when the prestige of the country is more important to me than my wallet. You don’t understand this: we grew up at a time when the well-being of society was put in the first place and only then we could think about ourselves. And you want everything for yourself now and more.
                      1. twviewer
                        twviewer 3 March 2018 18: 40
                        +7
                        Quote: СРЦ П-15
                        I feel good as much as possible for a retiree with 15 thousand. retirement. And besides, at the age of 62, I also work and don’t whine, as some do not wait for the manna from heaven! And then, I am at such an age when the prestige of the country is more important to me than my wallet. You don’t understand this: we grew up at a time when the well-being of society was put in the first place and only then we could think about ourselves. And you want everything for yourself now and more.

                        Is it the Rotenbergs and Timchens that are shaking over the well-being of society? do not make me laugh. According to the classic, some carry out exploitation out of personal interests, by the way, while the other dictates their will.
                        Why do you whine, if everything turns out that you like it.
                      2. passing
                        passing 3 March 2018 19: 47
                        +7
                        You don’t understand this: we grew up at a time when the well-being of society was put in the first place and only then we could think about ourselves

                        According to the IMF and VTsIOM statistics before joining Oreshkin’s firm. Over 3 years, the number of people living below the poverty line has increased, while the income of billionaires has increased
                        In 2017, sales of premium cars increased by 18 percent. At the same time, 70 percent of their total number was sold in Moscow and the region.
                        Not a car of the middle segment, which would indicate an increase in household incomes, namely premium. All this is due to the economic policy of the country's leadership.
                        Attention, the question is, what kind of society are you for, if you are satisfied with the mess in the country? Or are you afraid that when you change the leader you will be shoved from the post? Then do not speak for all the people
            2. Orionvit
              Orionvit 3 March 2018 17: 11
              +3
              Quote: passing
              when there are no arguments, go to rudeness!

              Sorry, what are your arguments? Why don't you like everything? This is not an argument, but a life position, by the way is not the best. Inherent to offended children and hysterical women.
        4. nikon7717
          nikon7717 4 March 2018 00: 58
          +2
          If you carry out a special operation, should you be like everyone else or suddenly it will turn out to be sharply clean? Serdyukov and Vasilyev were put in their place, they worked exactly the same as they seemed, they stole for the media, only, damn it, if the goal was to show that they were stupid thieves and the whole army was being blown, that they could still make the audience public? all believed and you including, along with amers. lit up like suckers)))) and the guys worked out the legend of des ...
      2. egor-kz
        egor-kz 3 March 2018 12: 12
        +4
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Neither Rogozin nor Shoigu had anything to do with the beginning of the rearmament of the army!

        Sincere wish to you, Colleague: all this, especially about S.K. Shoigu, pronounce in the combat unit of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Agree to the end. And leave healthy there.
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 3 March 2018 13: 15
          +4
          A colleague means that the rearmament of the army began and was planned before the arrival of Shoigu. And this is so, because it is a long process.
          What is wrong again?
          1. egor-kz
            egor-kz 5 March 2018 00: 25
            0
            It's not like that, Colleague. Or you need to divide what has been said into "two", namely: rearmament is really
            Quote: Mestny
            long process
            but only in what pans is the then Minister of Defense here ??? That is exactly what, in my opinion, is not so.
        2. V. Salama
          V. Salama 3 March 2018 14: 48
          0
          Quote: egor-kz

          Sincere wish to you, Colleague: all this, especially about S.K. Shoigu, pronounce in the combat unit of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Agree to the end. And leave healthy there.

          A strange argument, Colleague, do not you think? Especially about the military unit ... Or do you think that you will play in contrast with Taburetkin? I think no one will bite, the logical connections between what and with what should the combat unit be established? What form was given in which the soldier does not die and is no longer fed with canned food? You can say thank you, but it should always be like this, but it only became when they reached the edge. And for this, it’s too early to say thank you for this, here it is necessary to draw conclusions and punish the guilty ones. I can’t understand how it’s possible to connect with Stalin’s methods and “Soviet leaven,” something that doesn’t go into any gates, but “People eat it calmly”:
          As part of this special operation, a defiantly absurd furniture minister ... was brought to the forefront of events ... who became a kind of lightning rod of "unpopular measures"
          Notice, I did not put quotation marks. Don't you think, Colleague, that this is a bust with thoughtfulness? And what can be attributed to “unpopular measures” that could not be implemented on the basis of competent decisions and in the legal field?
          1. egor-kz
            egor-kz 4 March 2018 23: 49
            0
            V. Salama

            A strange argument, Colleague, do not you think?
            No, Colleague, I don’t think so. Thanks to the Minister of Defense, let the current officers speak. I have long been in stock. Well felt accent, Colleague. In the combat unit, no one plays in any contrast. Expressing your syllable as “contrast with Taburetkin” in the units and subunits, you felt and noted for a long time. Moreover, the meaning of what I said is categorically disagreeing with the maxim that Mr. Serdyukov was laying somewhere, some kind of foundation or foundation. ONLY ABOUT THIS SPEECH.
            The acting Minister of Defense, thank you, smacks of obscurity. Although I had to hear for the form of gratitude. From ordinary and sergeant staff. The army has been reformed a lot. Already.
      3. mig29mks
        mig29mks 3 March 2018 12: 36
        +6
        all this looks like a special operation to misinform a potential enemy !!! and when the conflict was brewing in Georgia in 2008, many were outraged that Serdyukov had made repairs in the headquarters building and had taken all the documents somewhere! but for me it was so clean from wiretaps from Yeltsin’s times from unnecessary eyes and ears and a lot of what else!
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 3 March 2018 13: 19
          +3
          This, by the way, is the peculiarities of the country's governance - strategic long-term planning of activities based on information that is not available to the vast majority of citizens.
          And often these very citizens, seeing only the immediate facade of the process, raise a friendly howl that the country is going the wrong way, that all crooks and thieves. and just do not know how to.
      4. New Year day
        New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 15
        +9
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        And all the dirty work was done by Serdyukov

        it’s not strange. but with all my dislike for this person, I agree with this point of view. But along the path of modernization, Mr. Serdyukov, along with his fellow travelers, managed to get into the pocket of the state more than once and this came to the surface only because of him love with Vasilyeva. He would be modest in everyday life - no one would know anything.
      5. businessv
        businessv 3 March 2018 16: 57
        +2
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        where would the same Shoigu be if he started instead of Serdyukov to rake these "Augean stables"!

        Dear, Shoigu signified by you, if you have not noticed, is always put where the biggest mess, the big thefts and the rest can’t cope. It is not for nothing that those who work in the public sector monitor their movements and after the next, try to get under his head again because they know that where Shoigu is, money is paid there and order begins. Fortunately, it is being moved in structures of either paramilitary or military. He is an excellent organizer, and about Serdyukov we will certainly hear something else, for example, under whose wing he managed to steal so much and why he was not put in prison.
    3. Fedorovich
      Fedorovich 3 March 2018 10: 13
      +1
      True, it was with them that Georgia was placed with cancer ...
      1. iouris
        iouris 3 March 2018 12: 40
        +11
        Quote: Fedorovich
        put Georgia on cancer ...

        Firstly, not Georgia, but Georgia. Secondly, Georgia was armed for several years, but the great nuclear power, nevertheless, allowed to attack itself, calling into question its status. The question is why, in order to carry out the reform? Thirdly, it turned out that Georgia’s pro-American political regime was not overthrown, and its “president,” Saa ..., what a wonderful person, is still doing what he did: he creates the rationale for “containing Russia”.
        So, I think, your interpretation of history is not quite, and maybe completely, does not correspond to the real picture.
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 3 March 2018 13: 29
        +4
        Quote: Fedorovich
        put Georgia on cancer ...

        Putting Georgia is not a problem, especially for a state like Russia. The problem is generally not in Georgia, just as now in the Donbass the problem is not in Ukraine. The main war is on other fronts, which Putin voiced.
    4. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 29
      0
      So they used it blindly.
    5. lady.endzhi
      lady.endzhi 3 March 2018 13: 11
      +1
      Geksagena
      And none of Taburetkin makes a hero, do you not understand the article? Stools are a screen for people like Putin and Shoigu.
    6. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 07
      0
      Now is the time of hybrid wars. Now the partisan can be found everywhere. Even in the camp of the liberals. However, and vice versa, under the guise of a patriot, an American agent can be encrypted.
      1. Tatanka Yotanka
        Tatanka Yotanka 3 March 2018 23: 09
        +8
        Well, with the partisan in the camp of the liberals is more or less clear))

        it remains to be determined whether the patriots under the agents are encrypted or the agents under the patriots)))
  3. izya top
    izya top 3 March 2018 06: 56
    +4
    Russia does not see Europe as its potential military adversary.
    But what about the island of villains?
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 3 March 2018 07: 52
      0
      Quote: izya top
      But what about the island of villains?

      What is an island? They will not be remade, they will continue to spoil.
      1. izya top
        izya top 3 March 2018 08: 01
        +3
        Quote: Tatar 174
        They can’t be redone,

        drown? repeat
        1. dog breeder
          dog breeder 3 March 2018 12: 22
          +1
          izya top Today, 08:01 ↑
          Quote: Tartar 174
          They can’t be redone,
          drown?

          Wash off.
          1. Tatar 174
            Tatar 174 3 March 2018 17: 43
            0
            Quote: dog breeder
            Wash off.

            Because they swim, not drown laughing
        2. meandr51
          meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 36
          0
          Overload. The Irish will help.
    2. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 35
      0
      This is not quite Europe ... Therefore, there is a special program for them.
  4. Tahtvjd2868
    Tahtvjd2868 3 March 2018 07: 02
    +22
    It would be interesting to see similar cartoons about the factories and factories built .. The fields cleared of weeds .. And to see our pensioners driving their retirement to world attractions .. and in the Louvre to hang around not with Chinese pensioners, but with Russian .. Where is the performance report your messages to the people?
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 3 March 2018 07: 32
      +28
      . This is a normal patriot of his homeland yet Soviet sourdoughable to organize a business exactly as he was taught in the profession

      Why is the patriot Soviet sourdough such an abnormal gap in the country between rich and poor ?? The Guarantor copes well with foreign policy and armaments. But, for whom is he doing this, if in Russia decent conditions are created only for oligarchs?
      It turns out that there, who is on top - did a great job! And they took all the wealth to themselves, and secured the regime (at the external frontier advanced weapons, at the internal Rosguard), and even gained the glory of the ardent patriots of Russia. Well done boys! In the ladies!
      1. Odysseus
        Odysseus 3 March 2018 07: 48
        +22
        Quote: Stas157
        Garant copes well with foreign policy and weapons

        Not bad ? laughing This is with motorized rifles on the BMP-2 and BRM-1, sailors on 1155 and 956, submariners with 4 nuclear submarines built over 25 years watching cartoons about the "nuclear submarine drone, simultaneously silent and ultra-fast" exploding the United States (in which the "Russian elites" are super-active buy nedvizhu)?
        You are a reasonable person ...
        1. Mountain shooter
          Mountain shooter 3 March 2018 09: 10
          +6
          As part of our Navy, there are slightly more submarines and they are fresher. Take an interest ... And special boats are not the only one ... Just to get closer to the truth.
          1. twviewer
            twviewer 3 March 2018 12: 57
            +5
            USSR weapons were mountains and what helped? And then "non-Soviet"! Drew and paradise will come ... as soon as the Internet in each village will conduct :) Insanity.
          2. New Year day
            New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 21
            +6
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Just to get closer to the truth.


            An unnamed representative of the Yantar shipyard (Kaliningrad): the Admiral Butakov and Admiral Istomin, which have already been lowered from the Yantar slipways, but so far unfinished, will be brought to mind on the spot and then sold to India.
            The Admiral Kornilov, which was built in Kaliningrad for the Black Sea Fleet, but has long been mothballed, will be towed to the same country, and the Indians themselves will build it with our help at Goa Shipyard Ltd, which will receive advanced technologies from Russia.
            Only for the opportunity, with Russian help, to finish building “Admiral Kornilov” in India, and then to produce another such frigate from scratch there, Delhi will pay Moscow about $ 800 million. Plus - 51 million dollars for project documentation.
            Thus, the entire Indian Navy will immediately receive the four Project 11356 warships, on which BrahMos anti-ship cruise missile systems of a joint development with Russia will be installed. The total amount of the transaction concluded by Moscow and Delhi is $ 3 billion.
            Black Sea Fleet: the cruiser Moskva has long been immobilized and is waiting for many years of repair. The large anti-submarine ship "Kerch" is seriously damaged in a fire on November 4, 2014, and is awaiting decommissioning. Apart from the already mentioned three new frigates of Project 11356, the remaining large combat units of the 30th division of anti-submarine ships (“Okay”, “Inquisitive” and “Sharp”) for a total of 124 years old. And to leave them from the pier will soon become simply dangerous.
            It turns out that our most belligerent fleet is about to “dry up” in just a few years to simply dangerous sizes. Its surface component will be reduced to only three frigates.
          3. Odysseus
            Odysseus 3 March 2018 17: 10
            +5
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            As part of our Navy, there are slightly more submarines and they are fresher. Take an interest ..

            Over the past 25 years, 4 new nuclear submarines were built: Severodvinsk, Monomakh, Nevsky, Dolgoruky. The rest is the Soviet legacy.
            Your Captain Evidence.
      2. meandr51
        meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 38
        0
        Create another theme in another resource. This has nothing to do with the army.
      3. Orionvit
        Orionvit 3 March 2018 13: 43
        +7
        Quote: Stas157
        Why does the patriot of Soviet sourdough have such an abnormal gap in the country between the rich and the poor?

        How much can I repeat that within the framework of the existing system, not a single patriot will be able to restore perfect order, even if he is the president. You recall what legacy Putin received from the memorable 90s? And on the issue of the "anomalous gap", so my friend is called capitalism, everywhere will not be like that. At least, until the state formation changes. I am surprised at naive adults who seem to have lived their lives, but still believe in a "fairy tale" and think that it is enough to vote for a "fashionable candidate" or express their "philistine displeasure" and everything will suddenly become fine, as if by magic . To destroy something, a lot of intelligence is not necessary, but to build something (especially the state), this takes years, if not decades, of hard work. I say this because I have the misfortune to live in Ukraine at the moment. And looking at you from here, I am sincerely perplexed, are you completely stunned there (I wanted to express myself more clearly, but again they’ll ban me) What more do you need? You just don’t know what is bad.
        1. flicker
          flicker 3 March 2018 18: 54
          +2
          I am surprised at naive adults who seem to have lived their lives, but still believe in a "fairy tale" and think that it is enough to vote for a "fashionable candidate" or express their "philistine displeasure" and everything will suddenly become fine, as if by magic .
          There are no "naive adults" here, but rather "rabbi's nephews."
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 3 March 2018 20: 10
            0
            Quote: flicker
            There are no "naive adults" here, but rather "rabbi's nephews"

            Apparently, there are enough of both.
    2. yuriyselivanov
      3 March 2018 08: 54
      +5
      Stop whining!
      1. 210ox
        210ox 3 March 2018 09: 15
        +8
        Well, let's applaud!
        Quote: yuriyselivanov
        Stop whining!
        1. amirbek
          amirbek 3 March 2018 12: 37
          +2
          Quote: 210ox
          Well, let's applaud!

          ETOGES Lope it is necessary to have patience to know and wait ... so then soooo modestly say ...
          ETOGES such technology .... all the guys dump capitalism in a basket ... it is good to plow on villains ... it's time to start living, resting and moving in the space where you want and on your personal transport, so to speak fellow
      2. New Year day
        New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 25
        +5
        Quote: yuriyselivanov
        Stop whining!

        and soberly look at the circumstances does not work? In your opinion: or whining, or hat-making need to do?
    3. 210ox
      210ox 3 March 2018 09: 14
      +4
      Why promise the impossible from the beginning? With the current socio-political system and leadership?
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      It would be interesting to see similar cartoons about the factories and factories built .. The fields cleared of weeds .. And to see our pensioners driving their retirement to world attractions .. and in the Louvre to hang around not with Chinese pensioners, but with Russian .. Where is the performance report your messages to the people?
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 28
        +5
        Quote: 210ox
        Why promise the impossible from the beginning? With the current socio-political system and leadership?

        in order to “charge” the electorate before the election.
        In economics, speech is not impressive
    4. krops777
      krops777 3 March 2018 11: 01
      +4
      And to see our pensioners traveling to their retirement destinations around the world .. and in the Louvre to hang around not with Chinese pensioners, but with Russians ..

      In China, there are no pensioners by definition, do you think they are not poor? Take a trip to China to the countryside of Beijing and see the full blaze of poverty. Our economy is only at the beginning of its development and parity needs to be created now, it will have to endure.
      1. Freeman
        Freeman 3 March 2018 15: 41
        +3
        krops777 Today, 11:01
        In China, there are no pensioners by definition.

        You have somewhat outdated information, there are pensions in China.
        But so far only among civil servants and workers in industry.
        Pensions from the rural population, Until recently, did not have.
        Hence your
        Take a trip to China's suburbs of Beijing and see the brilliance of poverty

        Here are more recent data
        At the beginning of the 21st century, the pension system was revised and now in China receive a pension:
        * Public sector workers (from party workers to doctors and teachers)
        * Workers
        * Peasants
        * Employees of private enterprises
        The minimum pension in China in 2017 was 618 yuan (in rubles this is about 5.500) per month. But among residents of large cities, this figure is much higher. For example, for Beijing and Shanghai pensioners, the average pension is 3500 yuan (31.000 rubles), very good! However, given the high level of capital prices, this is slightly higher than the cost of living. In developed cities, with a population of more than 10 million people, the average pension is 2000 yuan (17.500 rubles).
        https://mirkitaja.ru/pensiya-v-kitae/


        I repeat again. The rural population (peasants) is only just beginning to be covered by pensions. So far, only those of them who have been making contributions to pension funds for at least 15 years can count on retirement.
        1. krops777
          krops777 3 March 2018 15: 58
          +1
          Every fourth inhabitant of the Middle Kingdom receives a pension, and for this fourth part of the pension, they vary greatly from 50 to 1500 yuan from here, and the conclusion that pensioners who receive a decent pension in China is negligible.
          1. Freeman
            Freeman 3 March 2018 19: 42
            +2
            Quote: krops777
            Every fourth inhabitant of the Middle Kingdom receives a pension ...

            But before that, you argued that * In China there are no pensioners by definition *.
            To this I replied that your information was out of date. hi
            pensions vary greatly from 50 to 1500 yuan

            Pensions really vary greatly, but the source I cited states
            Minimum pension in China in 2017 was 618 yuan (in rubles it is about 5.500) per month

            You see, minimal and not average.
            retirees receiving decent retirement in China are negligible.

            Given the number of elderly people in China (for 2015, the PRC has more than 200 million people over 60 years old, which is 14,9% of the Chinese population. An increase of 10 million per year.), it is impossible not to agree with this.
            But there are improvements on the face, especially when you consider that for a long time pensions in China, for the majority of the population, really were not.
    5. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 16
      +1
      You’ll be tired of watching cartoons. It's easier to go to the site of Rosstat.ru and get acquainted with all the achievements there. In particular, agricultural indicators have increased 2000 times since 40.
    6. stylet
      stylet 6 March 2018 04: 38
      0
      type in the search engine "Time Forward!"
      https://www.youtube.com/user/ShkolaFaberlic
  5. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 3 March 2018 07: 05
    +14
    By the way, a nuclear engine on a rocket is the development of the solar system.
    The world needs a GOAL and space can become such a unifying factor.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 3 March 2018 07: 17
      +4
      Razvedka_Boem Today, 07:05 AM New
      By the way, a nuclear engine on a rocket is the development of the solar system.
      The world needs a GOAL and space can become such a unifying factor.

      So yes, we drive to Mars, have a smoke and begin development!
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 3 March 2018 07: 36
        +3
        Quote: aszzz888
        So yes, we drive to Mars, have a smoke and begin development!

        why learn? to explode, and to equip especially valuable "golden" asteroids with movers and direct them to the ground
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 3 March 2018 08: 02
          +2
          aybolyt678 Today, 07:36 ↑
          Quote: aszzz888
          So yes, we drive to Mars, have a smoke and begin development!
          why learn? to explode, and to equip especially valuable "golden" asteroids with movers and direct them to the ground

          Oh how! Then we need an additional storage area to look after. Colorado, Virginia or Washington there, for example, the area! wink
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. nikolaev
      nikolaev 3 March 2018 12: 21
      +5
      I searched for a long time with a microscope trolling, but never found.
      A good article!
    2. populist
      populist 3 March 2018 13: 41
      +2
      Odysseus
      Putin’s Chubais’s power is mockingly sophisticated, you must be able to do this. Level 99 trolling.

      This is not trolling.
      The author thinks so and is convinced of all this. This is what many think in VO and most of the "electorate" (if not the vast majority)
      The sincerity of the author (in error) confirms his thinking style. Namely - the 3rd question is empty, and the 4th gives out wishful thinking.
      1. cedar
        cedar 3 March 2018 16: 57
        +3
        You look tormented by doubts, tolerate a little ...
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 March 2018 07: 20
    +13
    The author asking questions himself answered them intelligibly. I can only add that I completely agree with the author.
  8. odometer
    odometer 3 March 2018 07: 38
    +14
    Everything is for the people. For the Russian, “Fatherland is in danger!”, For the American, “Russians are coming!” And “hand washes hand slowly”, supranational gangs cut loot, arranging shows for each of their constituencies. sad
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 3 March 2018 13: 54
      0
      odometer

      An interesting device. laughing Have you tried to measure yourself, or is your "device" going through the roof?
    2. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 20
      +3
      It is not good to envy. Envy is the most terrible feeling and destroys a person’s personality.
      1. cedar
        cedar 3 March 2018 16: 59
        +4
        Pride. It was she who slipped the US elite and drives her crazy ..
  9. aybolyt678
    aybolyt678 3 March 2018 07: 40
    +6
    Once again proud for the president.
    1. cedar
      cedar 3 March 2018 07: 55
      +8
      In addition to our pride in him, he still needs our friendly support in the elections.
  10. cedar
    cedar 3 March 2018 07: 53
    +3
    "War is the art of deception."
    Spoofing false goals and other gambits ...
  11. Snail N9
    Snail N9 3 March 2018 08: 22
    +3
    How can we evaluate the global reaction to the speech of Vladimir Putin?
    The first and most important thing, of course, is the feeling of complete and general confusion. Shock and Awe.

    laughing lol love hi
    1. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 28
      +3
      In fact, the United States has long been in shock. First, Georgia, then Our Crimea, then Syria. And now there’s also a 10-fold supersonic flyback from V.V. Putin with a concrete wish that the United States listen carefully to Russia. Here the reaction may be different. From hysterical laughter to jumping into the windows shouting "Russians are coming."
      1. cedar
        cedar 3 March 2018 17: 18
        +3
        This is only the beginning of the symphony "The Russians are coming" ... Introductory part, so to speak ... Next is fire, water and copper ... basins for the dull.
      2. brain city
        brain city 5 March 2018 09: 02
        0
        As I understand it, in the Russian Federation nothing is done without looking back at the USA? And in the media, and on the forums ... But do you sometimes watch other media outlets? So, purely for objectivity? They write about the Russian Federation incomparably less, the Russian Federation really does not care much for them, not like they show on TV. Think it over.
  12. Old26
    Old26 3 March 2018 09: 25
    +4
    Quote: 210ox
    The situation with nuclear-powered rockets is interesting. According to their purpose and specifics of operation, they can only be launched in a nuclear conflict where everything is clear and there will be no winners. The operation of these engines leads to radiation infection. The question is where and how to test this technique.

    Well, with the question of testing the reactor itself, questions just do not arise (sorry for the tautology). This is the New Earth. But the test of the “reactor” (rumor has it that it was tested in November-December 2017) does not mean that the power plant itself and the rocket as a complex exist. Firstly, it is not clear what kind of rocket it is, what are its speed parameters. The second one. A lot of research will have to be done to ensure that radiation from this reactor does not affect the electronics of the flight control system and the electronics of the charge detonation system. Secondly, it is not yet clear how the issue of maintaining the heat balance of the rocket will be resolved. It is one thing when it is supersonic, then cooling is removed as a problem. second, if it is subsonic. IMHO yet a nuclear cruise missile (more precisely, with a nuclear engine) is by no means the immediate prospect. And, by the way, the question of how much air and the environment will be infected from the passage of such a rocket is also a question.

    You can make a mock up of anything, but sometimes before being put into series - a very long period of time and not the fact that such a product may turn out to be serial.
    The simplest example is work in the USSR and the USA on atomic aircraft. It seemed like a huge number of pluses, but it turned out that there were cons that put a bold cross on these projects.

    Quote: Razvedka_Boem
    By the way, a nuclear engine on a rocket is the development of the solar system.
    The world needs a GOAL and space can become such a unifying factor.

    Space engine, please note. And there will be completely different parameters. The engine of this rocket is disposable. Yes, and the rocket itself is something like a control shot in the head of a person who got in line with the KPVT.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 48
      +1
      Those. Do you think that Putin lied for the good about the presence of such weapons? What's the point? Did he lie in armaments before? Or wants to disappear from Russia in a couple of months? By the way, you think that he lied, and the rocket is not needed. That is, the General Staff and the military-industrial complex are stupid people. You were not asked.
      I am inclined to think that there is a CR with a nuclear-powered engine in the form of a prototype. And that it is needed to saturate anti-aircraft defense systems with a massive attack. If this is within budget, this needs to be done.
      1. Scalpel
        Scalpel 9 March 2018 11: 30
        0
        Rather, "let the fog", which he has already done repeatedly. Maybe there are prototypes, but it is unlikely that they have at least been tested.
  13. omit
    omit 3 March 2018 09: 37
    +5
    laughing laughing tongue Well, just no words tongue laughing laughing
    1. cedar
      cedar 3 March 2018 14: 55
      +4
      You are no exception ... Today, many have nothing to say.
  14. Ural resident
    Ural resident 3 March 2018 09: 58
    +4
    Regarding Serdyukov, I also always thought that this was a sign for the West: do not go here - here are yours.
    And on the sly you can calmly and re-equip the army, the main thing is to "lull" friends, that everything is fine.
    It’s the same thing - for a long time I didn’t understand why Rogozin, who was reminiscent of a character from the film “The Secret of the Third Planet”, was sent by the special representative to NATO, then he realized that it was such a mockery of the “partners” - the level of our attitude towards them.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 12: 50
      +2
      They just didn’t read Russian fairy tales about Ivan the Fool in the West.
  15. cats
    cats 3 March 2018 10: 04
    +6
    An article, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye ..
    They were interested in what HPP is ..
    I think we are somewhere half the way. hi
  16. nikolaev
    nikolaev 3 March 2018 10: 07
    +5
    much off topic.
    An article appeared in Russian Spring on the United States Unleashing Russia's Hands in Ukraine.
    Two “sheets” appeared in the comments - “for all good versus all bad”.
    Unfortunately, there is not a single sensible answer - one mate.
    They constantly banned me there, although neither mat, nor fakes, nor other obscenities were allowed there.
    Here is my answer to these sheets:
    “The West, by all means, must prevent Putin’s election, any means are attracted, numerous and diverse faces are taken in the information war, including those“ favored by the Russian people. ”But there’s one thing: now we’ll say anything , just to get to the throat, and then we will hang ... "
    If possible, visit this site, read the sheets mentioned and give a decent answer for yourself and for that guy (that is, for me). This can not be skipped without an answer, especially since the same topic was voiced on other resources in other articles (not in the comments, but in the articles), where the commentary is limited or not allowed. That is, this information is not an accident, but a planned attack in a different style, which can provoke undesirable consequences.
    1. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 40
      +6
      There are many such sites now where coordination is clearly visible and the bloggers who support V.V. Putin are banned. And the forum is left to the pro-American bots pouring mud on Russia, life in Russia, Putin and Russians. Rambler.ru is one of such resources. They immediately banned me for supporting Putin.
      1. cedar
        cedar 3 March 2018 17: 23
        +3
        Blogs stint on the vine. Team "Greens do not regret." And then the bots have fun.
  17. nikolaev
    nikolaev 3 March 2018 10: 22
    +7
    The announcement of secret developments is most likely a necessary measure so that some sobering up in the west, so that stupidity is not done on the other side due to thoughtlessness. The world has approached a dangerous line and this information gives him another chance.
  18. wellaut
    wellaut 3 March 2018 10: 24
    +1
    defiantly awkward furniture minister

    Just do not so frankly extol to heaven! I do not believe in such directly super abilities and foresight.
    And what other state can a person build with the education and experience of a KGB colonel? Explicitly based not on so-called democratic principles. Other principles play here: clannishness - we don’t give our own, all means are good, lies and provocations for the sake of achieving goals. The television is now just propaganda Soviet Union 2,0.
    Success is certainly impressive. But this does not abolish the poverty of the bulk of the country's population.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 13: 00
      +6
      And when did you live richly? But the army in Russia must be combat-ready and formidable by default, regardless of the welfare of the population. You would still advise Stalin to provide the cars of the Soviet people first, and only then the army - airplanes and tanks ... The growth of general wealth is possible, but only if there is a proper army.
      Regarding the qualifications of the presidents, please remind me where they are taught? And in which country is it more intelligent and effective as a manager. According to the principle: accepted and left.
    2. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 45
      +3
      The concept of poverty is relative. What you consider poverty in Russia, in other countries is considered wealth. Compared to 2000, the standard of living has grown tenfold.
      1. Scalpel
        Scalpel 9 March 2018 11: 34
        0
        In 2000, I could save up for an apartment in Moscow for a year from my salary. This will not work out now.
    3. businessv
      businessv 3 March 2018 18: 24
      +1
      Quote: wellaut
      Success is certainly impressive. But this does not abolish the poverty of the bulk of the country's population.

      So, therefore, they believe that the value of their significance does not correspond to the funds spent on them, and even steal how much! And about poverty, then look at the media, or Rosstat, which Russia went to the Supreme and how much needed to be done. If you are not a fan of the Yeltsin Center, then of course you will agree that everything that could be distributed and drunk was distributed and drunk! It was just a systematic destruction of the country. The restoration and return to ownership of the country's resources is a longer process, but it is almost complete. That is why in relation to the embezzlers and officials who already do not feel the land beneath themselves, they are not doing anything, this is the main question. I will not believe that less is known about the state property cut above than we are. Why are these freaks so dragged away from the feeder? I don’t remember which famous person said, but "if you don’t understand what’s the matter, then it’s money!" soldier
  19. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 3 March 2018 10: 59
    +7
    Putin, of course, did not state everything in his statement .. The weapon is a good and necessary thing!
    But I think the West is digging a hole “financial” and they are very violently reacting to this, in every possible way sanctioning and humiliating Russia and Putin! It’s not yet evening gentlemen .. hi
    Oh, you have to pay a lot for the gentlemen and your "mongrel" including ..
    1. Tatanka Yotanka
      Tatanka Yotanka 3 March 2018 18: 32
      +9
      Quote: MIKHAN
      But I think "he digs a hole in the financial" West

      and here are the main diggers hehe))) fellow
  20. dgonni
    dgonni 3 March 2018 11: 42
    +4
    Р'РѕРїСЂРѕСЃ 1. RЎRѕRѕS,RІRμS,SЃS,RІSѓRμS, R "Ryo RґRμR№SЃS,RІRoS,RμR" SЊRЅRѕSЃS,Ro RoRЅS "RѕSЂRјR ° C † RoSЏ P'P" P RґRoRјRoSЂR ° ° ° RџSѓS,RoRЅR of the PS RЅRѕRІRμR№S Roes ... € ± RѕR СЂР ° Р · С † Р ° С ... стрР° С‚РµРіРёС З РµСЃРєРѕРіРѕ оружия Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё?


    Answer: Corresponds fully and exactly to the extent that is designated by the President of Russia. In the case of Vladimir Putin, who has already become a world-class historical figure, one thing can definitely be said - he never stooped and never stooped to a banal, momentary lie. But how is Ihtam not with the green men?
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 13: 04
      +1
      He didn’t lie, but only said something vague. Putin did not claim that the Crimean polite had no relation to Russia. He simply did not name their affiliation and noted that the Russian Federation has the right to the military contingent in Crimea. Then no one claims that presidents never lie. It is entirely permissible to lie in detail, but to tell the truth in essence. But the essence is this: do not panic - rake in full.
    2. Natalia777
      Natalia777 3 March 2018 15: 49
      +3
      Russian troops in the amount of 20 thousand were in the Crimea in accordance with the agreement. So there was no need to transfer troops. Enough permanent contingent to ensure the peaceful passage of the referendum in the Crimea.
  21. PVL176
    PVL176 3 March 2018 12: 07
    +8
    For the sake of increasing interest, the president of a great country has made it a scarecrow for the whole world! Not at the moment when you need to click the enemy’s nose to stop, not when it’s pointless and harmful to hide further, not to get any preferences for the country. Just as part of the campaign. Is it really so bad and the percentage falls? But there are no competitors! The Caliber strike was timely and effective. But these are armament samples. Here are promising developments. Maybe this is again the HSP for the removal of the adversary in the wrong direction of containment? And the main, most important surprise is hidden for another occasion? I do not believe in this, but this is the only thing that can at least partially justify the damage caused to the country in connection with the widely announced beginning of the arms race with the West.
    1. nikolaev
      nikolaev 3 March 2018 12: 26
      +2
      repeatedly
      The announcement of secret developments is most likely a necessary measure so that some sobering up in the west, so that stupidity is not done on the other side due to thoughtlessness. The world has approached a dangerous line and this information gives him another chance.
    2. meandr51
      meandr51 3 March 2018 13: 18
      +5
      Your dislike of Putin does not allow you to see the picture of the world as a whole. Not Putin began an arms race. It was Trump who announced a sharp increase in army spending a few months ago and demanded that his allies increase. It was the United States that deployed a network of missile defense areas and is expanding it further, surrounding Russia. It was the United States that said it could launch a nuclear strike "in response to a hacker attack." So who's the scarecrow here?
      So Putin’s message is very timely. Right now in Europe the issue of raising military budgets is being decided. And new information will throw arguments to the opponents of a military alliance with the United States. "Russia is strong and will become even stronger. USA is a paper tiger. Let's live together!"
      1. PVL176
        PVL176 3 March 2018 17: 57
        +4
        What are you talking about? It was the USSR, our troops were in Berlin. All this was handed over for jeans and sausage for some and for palaces and yachts for others. That is, sold for a well-fed life. But it turned out not for everyone. There is no development strategy in the country. We got the Crimea but lost Ukraine, left the Donbass under fire in limbo, got stuck in Syria, took away property, took away the flag and anthem at the Olympics. Even in the foreign policy that Putin is proud of, things are bad. All these external affairs and the search for the enemy simply to distract the people from a helpless, harmful domestic policy.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. yuriyselivanov
      4 March 2018 12: 30
      0
      Can I find out your last name? I will advise everyone to promote you to the presidency of the Russian Federation. Putin, in comparison with you, is simply an illiterate kid.
      1. PVL176
        PVL176 5 March 2018 22: 52
        0
        I withdraw my candidacy in advance, as I am busy with other matters. But I am very bitter and upset that our great country was almost torn apart by a handful of officials and their children, oligarchs and their children, friends and their children, covered by your deity.
        1. stylet
          stylet 6 March 2018 05: 01
          0
          Quote: PVL176
          as busy with other things

          Do you work for VO?
          1. PVL176
            PVL176 8 March 2018 02: 20
            0
            I work for my family, and this is a hobby.
  22. Reklastik
    Reklastik 3 March 2018 12: 14
    0
    technologies to ensure a regime of complete secrecy of defense at a strategic level were developed and brought to absolute perfection in the Stalin Soviet Union.
    The Internet is a by-product of the USSR special communications system, developed by the People's Commissar Peresypkin, capitalized by an organized criminal community from North America)))))
  23. turbris
    turbris 3 March 2018 12: 24
    +5
    Quote: dgonni
    But how is Ihtam not with the green men?

    Check once again which units were part of the Black Sea Fleet in Crimea before the Maidan, you will find a brigade of marines - these were also green men, but they were there from the beginning, so everything is right, nobody lied to you.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 39
      +2
      Quote: turbris
      but they were there from the beginning, so everything is correct, no one deceived you.

      agree, one brigade to cover all the HF APU in the Crimea was not enough. The obvious things cannot be denied, even if you don't like it.

      they didn’t carry air
      You can easily find videos of the transfer of troops through the Kerch crossing. The number of APUs in Crimea at that time was about 27 thousand people. How many in a separate brigade of personnel?
  24. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 12: 33
    +5
    Quote: yuriyselivanov
    Stop whining!

    You are very "convincing"! wassat
  25. turbris
    turbris 3 March 2018 12: 34
    +4
    Quote: PVL176
    Just as part of the campaign. Is it really so bad and the percentage falls?

    The issue has long been resolved with the elections, and you know this, then why write all this in the hope of what? It is simply amazing that there are frank Russophobes on the site who have long forgotten about the country itself, about Russia in the struggle with the authorities. It’s probably harder to find arguments for your hatred and so get mad? Maybe Stalin was right about the "enemies of the people", that too many "critics" divorced.
  26. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 12: 36
    +6
    Quote: dgonni
    Р'РѕРїСЂРѕСЃ 1. RЎRѕRѕS,RІRμS,SЃS,RІSѓRμS, R "Ryo RґRμR№SЃS,RІRoS,RμR" SЊRЅRѕSЃS,Ro RoRЅS "RѕSЂRјR ° C † RoSЏ P'P" P RґRoRјRoSЂR ° ° ° RџSѓS,RoRЅR of the PS RЅRѕRІRμR№S Roes ... € ± RѕR СЂР ° Р · С † Р ° С ... стрР° С‚РµРіРёС З РµСЃРєРѕРіРѕ оружия Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё?


    Answer: Corresponds fully and exactly to the extent that is designated by the President of Russia. In the case of Vladimir Putin, who has already become a world-class historical figure, one thing can definitely be said - he never stooped and never stooped to a banal, momentary lie. But how is Ihtam not with the green men?

    Indeed, in relation to the Kursk nuclear submarine, he did not lie - "She drowned." sad
    1. yuriyselivanov
      4 March 2018 12: 27
      0
      Can I laugh? Was it apparently humor?
  27. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 12: 37
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Putin, of course, did not state everything in his statement .. The weapon is a good and necessary thing!
    But I think the West is digging a hole “financial” and they are very violently reacting to this, in every possible way sanctioning and humiliating Russia and Putin! It’s not yet evening gentlemen .. hi
    Oh, you have to pay a lot for the gentlemen and your "mongrel" including ..

    lol lol lol
    1. The comment was deleted.
  28. Santa Claus
    Santa Claus 3 March 2018 12: 39
    +2
    Chelyabinsk meteorite, the campaign was not a meteorite. and the vanguard, everything falls into place. Well, the first atomic engines were still in the USSR. satellites flew granite at them to guide the SCRC, after one unsuccessful departure from the arbiters, one in Canada fell at the beginning of 80 about radiation screaming although it was not recorded. Our party bosses closed the program although scientists were against and argued that there would be no radiation. that cr can be used in a non-nuclear version.
  29. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 12: 41
    +1
    Quote: Odyssey
    The author of this article is an unconditional genius. Putin’s Chubais’s power is mockingly sophisticated, you must be able to do this. Level 99 trolling. No Bulk with his films about the yachts-palaces of officials in the West did not even lie nearby.
    I sincerely admire talent.

    yes good
  30. Bully
    Bully 3 March 2018 12: 46
    +3
    An excellent tool for the "smoke screen" of the real activities of the defense industry is the Internet. And then a bourgeois invention was put at the service of the Motherland - people are discussing so much spam, it comes to a fight laughing At this time, the defense industry complex (and not only) is quietly implementing the planned activities. There must be some help from the liberals tongue
  31. Icarus
    Icarus 3 March 2018 13: 00
    +2
    Р'РѕРїСЂРѕСЃ 1. RЎRѕRѕS,RІRμS,SЃS,RІSѓRμS, R "Ryo RґRμR№SЃS,RІRoS,RμR" SЊRЅRѕSЃS,Ro RoRЅS "RѕSЂRјR ° C † RoSЏ P'P" P RґRoRјRoSЂR ° ° ° RџSѓS,RoRЅR of the PS RЅRѕRІRμR№S Roes ... € ± RѕR СЂР ° Р · С † Р ° С ... стрР° С‚РµРіРёС З РµСЃРєРѕРіРѕ оружия Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё?

    The best answer that will remove this question is to apply in reality any of those demonstrated by computer graphics in Putin's message. At least the “Dagger” against the barmaley in Syria, so that the missile flies over the US air defense system or over a surface military vessel, demonstrating speed in
    10 M.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 3 March 2018 13: 23
      +5
      We will now pass on your wish to the Ministry of Defense. Stay in touch.
      But the American “partners” as it were had enough cartoons - they do not howl about “universal truth”.
      1. Icarus
        Icarus 3 March 2018 14: 13
        +5
        You, I look at the relations with the State Department winked. You have already been informed that they believed the cartoons.
        PR all this Putin’s speech 17 days before the election. Than half an hour to show cartoons, one exponential launch of the dagger would be enough, preferably immediately after the publication of the new US military doctrine.
      2. Scalpel
        Scalpel 9 March 2018 11: 40
        0
        Yeah, they believed. They can't sleep right. Is there panic in the streets? Are people fleeing to shelters?
  32. New Year day
    New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 02
    +3
    this is certainly good, but "hatred" should not be dominant.

    need to soberly assess opportunities
  33. Anyone
    Anyone 3 March 2018 13: 12
    +2
    Lord You read such "articles" and think when these elections will come and the Internet and TV will cease to litter this election campaign!
  34. Mestny
    Mestny 3 March 2018 13: 21
    0
    Quote: Tahtvjd2868
    It would be interesting to see similar cartoons about the factories and factories built .. The fields cleared of weeds .. And to see our pensioners driving their retirement to world attractions .. and in the Louvre to hang around not with Chinese pensioners, but with Russian .. Where is the performance report your messages to the people?

    What is interesting to you, a bright personality - nobody cares.
    And this is good.
  35. Mestny
    Mestny 3 March 2018 13: 27
    +4
    Quote: PVL176
    come to life, for election purposes, in order to increase interest, the president of a great country makes it a scarecrow for the whole world! Not at the moment when you need to click the enemy’s nose to stop, not when it’s pointless and harmful to hide further, not to get any preferences for the country. Just as part of the campaign.

    And when it’s interesting, this very “moment” will come. And suddenly he has already come?
    Just only in the minds of adolescents - he pressed the button, the music began to play. Everything is simple.
    About the scarecrow for the whole world I will say so. This expression itself gives out headlessly a fighter with the regime, who faithfully believes in the civilized Western world. But oh well.
    There are generally only two ways - to be a scarecrow for the United States and its mongrels, and the stronger, the better. Or be the laughing stock and cannon fodder for them.
    Personally, I, like most Russian citizens, prefer the first path as the only one possible.
    If it seems to you that the most important thing is to feed every bright person to the fill, while at the same time becoming a well-known pose for the rest of the world. or even breaking up into pieces - you in Yavlinsky.
    It was he who, back in the 90s, argued about the following - if for individual happiness, satiety for an individual is necessary. so that Russia ceases to exist - so be it.
    This is a song from the series "whether it was necessary to defend in the Second World War. If such victims?" Or "it was necessary to surrender Leningrad, then millions would not have died"
    Well, in the end - “if it weren’t for Stalin, we would now eat sausages and drink German beer right in Mercedes.”
    Are you one of these? fighters for the quality of roads and pensioners' income?
    1. PVL176
      PVL176 3 March 2018 17: 42
      +3
      And when it’s interesting, this very “moment” will come. And suddenly he has already come?

      Has it really come? What happened extraordinary for the need for such statements?
      About the scarecrow for the whole world I will say so. This expression itself gives out headlessly a fighter with the regime, who faithfully believes in the civilized Western world.

      What does this mean? How do you know what I believe in?
      There are generally only two ways - to be a scarecrow for the United States and its mongrels, and the stronger, the better. Or be the laughing stock and cannon fodder for them. Personally, I, like most Russian citizens, prefer the first path as the only one possible.

      Here we reached the goal - at the same time becoming both a scarecrow and a laughing stock.
      If it seems to you that the most important thing is to feed every bright person to the fill, while at the same time becoming a well-known pose for the rest of the world. or even breaking up into pieces - you in Yavlinsky.
      It was he who, back in the 90s, argued about the following - if for individual happiness, satiety for an individual is necessary. so that Russia ceases to exist - so be it.

      you are confusing something, our bright personalities are full and satisfied, having grabbed some money, dumped in London and spit on Russia and the people.
      This is a song from the series "whether it was necessary to defend in the Second World War. If such victims?" Or "it was necessary to surrender Leningrad, then millions would not have died"

      Where did I talk about this?
      Well, in the end - “if it weren’t for Stalin, we would now eat sausages and drink German beer right in Mercedes.”
      Are you one of these? fighters for the quality of roads and pensioners' income?

      I did not understand about Stalin. Why is there a rattling of weapons now, and when did the Baltic states join NATO all were silent in a rag? I am for pensioners' income and quality of roads, but against the class, oligarchic-bureaucratic system of society, which the current government is imposing on us. If this does not stop there will be problems and missiles will not save.
  36. flicker
    flicker 3 March 2018 13: 27
    +6
    Thanks to the author for the article. There’s nothing to add, and therefore only quotes:
    ensure stealth large-scale resuscitation and renewal of the Russian army. The need for which was dictated by the well-known military-political weakness of Russia in the early 2000s. As part of this special operation, a defiantly absurd minister-furniture maker was brought to the forefront of events. And then it turned out that the entire clearing of the army "Augean stables" was carried out precisely with this notorious "stool", which became a kind of lightning rod of "unpopular measures."
    For it is far from a fact that our Western “partners” would allow Russia to do this in an absolutely open and transparent manner.

    Once again, everything is accurate and to the point.
  37. demo
    demo 3 March 2018 13: 30
    +4
    Р'РѕРїСЂРѕСЃ 1. RЎRѕRѕS,RІRμS,SЃS,RІSѓRμS, R "Ryo RґRμR№SЃS,RІRoS,RμR" SЊRЅRѕSЃS,Ro RoRЅS "RѕSЂRјR ° C † RoSЏ P'P" P RґRoRјRoSЂR ° ° ° RџSѓS,RoRЅR of the PS RЅRѕRІRμR№S Roes ... € ± RѕR СЂР ° Р · С † Р ° С ... стрР° С‚РµРіРёС З РµСЃРєРѕРіРѕ оружия Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё?
    To answer such a question, you must either have access to top secret documents, where figures and data on the technical characteristics of the product are grouped, or to have the product on hand.
    And you won’t get the first and second in a month or two. If secrecy is respected.
    And more.
    All modern products of the military-industrial complex are made by different factories. For limited blocks of documentation.
    And the final assembly and top-secret components are held somewhere else.
    And not the fact that having received some part of the documentation, a comprehensive conclusion can be drawn.
    So on average, intelligence takes up to three years.
    2 Question: Why was the newest weapon of Russia represented mainly in the form of computer animation, and not documentary filming? Is this not proof of fraud?
    Animation is both good and bad.
    The good thing is that it is not possible to draw an unambiguous conclusion about the appearance and predict the performance characteristics of the product.
    But the bad thing is that the level of confidence in words is reduced.
    If you present such products to the world, and present new rules of the game, then you can do it differently.
    How? Very simple. There is a documentary shooting, and then the image is slightly blurred.
    And that’s all. Hi Aunt Dusi, the barmaid.
    In our USSR, absolutely everything was filmed!
    Even top-secret hydrogen bomb tests.
    And nothing bad happened.
    So it’s more likely a minus than a plus.
    3 Question: Who is the new Russian strategic weapon directed against?
    I think that comments are unnecessary here.
    Everything is clear to everyone.
    It would be necessary to add to the end of the speech to V.V. Putin with a smile that we, the Russian Federation, decided to withdraw from the business trip of our illegal resident in the USA, working in a very high post, for his award with the Star of the Hero of the Russian Federation for his special merits in the fight with the American military. And let them also think about it.
    4 Question: How can you assess the world reaction to the speech of Vladimir Putin?
    Any hasty statements by international leaders are not welcome.
    First they listen to the reports of their heads of special services. Get to know the statements. And only then they make statements, or do not.
    Little time has passed. Let's wait.
    And maybe American newspapers will give a detailed interview with the chief of staff of the US Army.
    Then we realize what they think.
    5 Question: What will Western leaders do in the light of the revelations he has revealed about Russia's military capabilities?
    Yes, they will not do anything other than what they have been doing lately - to impose new sanctions.
    But we did not promise to shy away with our ultra-modern missiles in the capitals of countries that imposed sanctions?
    Why should they worry?
    As they crushed, they will crush as well.
    6 Question: How did Putin do all this?
    A question that is not and will not be answered.
    It was possible and succeeded.
    But the author’s next passage, to be honest, has baffled me.
    I quote:
    "And then it turned out that the entire clearing of the army" Augean stables "was carried out precisely with this notorious" stool ", which became a kind of lightning rod of" unpopular measures. "
    And most importantly, almost all contracts for the production of the latest Russian weapons systems, which surprise the whole world today, were concluded with him. Do not believe me - read the list of weapons systems contracted by this Minister in my previous article on this topic: https://news-front.info/2015/11/21/who-is-mister-
    serdyukov-yurij-selivanov /? utm_referrer = https% 3a%
    2f% 2fwww.google.com% 2f "
    Author!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is the cover price too high?
    With a real term (albeit scanty) to the chief financier of the Moscow Region. With bags of money. Etc. I do not want to list.
    Is this bumpy voluptuary a cover figure?
    And his father-in-law, Zubkov, covered the cover.
    And so on the cover that he almost flew out of the "clip".
    Author! The measure of delusions must be known.
    It’s not even worthwhile in one sentence to cross the line of reason.
    For such a negative attitude will be projected onto everything else.

    To the author, the deflection is counted.
    1. flicker
      flicker 3 March 2018 15: 30
      +4
      For it is far from a fact that our Western “partners” would allow Russia to do this in an absolutely open and transparent manner.
      Is this true or not? If yes, then:
      As part of this special operation, a defiantly absurd minister-furniture maker was brought to the forefront of events.
      it looks more than logical, which means:
      And then it turned out that the entire clearing of the army "Augean stables" was carried out precisely with this notorious "stool", which became a kind of lightning rod of "unpopular measures."
      and it looks quite obvious. So that:
      Author! The measure of delusions must be known.
      obviously superfluous.
    2. alex86
      alex86 3 March 2018 19: 23
      +6
      according to claim 1: a mixture of truth and bluff - Sarmat - certainly Vanguard - some work is underway, a dagger - probably there is, but the range is clearly overestimated, a rocket with a nuclear reactor - given out as desired, work is underway, but the result is not achieved, underwater drone - probably there is a certain prototype, but it’s not ready for actual operation
      according to claim 2: that which works cannot be shown (except for Sarmat, since there you can show anything), that which does not work - there is nothing to show
      according to claim 3: the goal, of course, is the United States, only at the State Department press conference for some reason did our correspondents try to deny this
      according to claim 4: everyone understood - one more Kim, version 2.0, you can wait for everything, with the adequacy of the problem
      according to claim 5: thanks to such speeches, NATO was becoming impaired and gaining momentum to mobilize and strengthen. Military budgets will be built up, and due to the small size of the Russian economy compared with most leading economies and the low efficiency of this economy, we will once again be brought to "guns instead of oil" and brought to the state of the USSR before the year 91, and then, God forbid. ..
      according to claim 6: he did not succeed in anything special, work on the defense industry was carried out, is ongoing and will continue, taking into account clause 1 - that is, that is, that is not there.
      The whole speech has two audiences: the internal one - “look how good I am, protecting you from the external enemy I have invented, believe me, and you will live as it happens (you didn’t live richly, you’ll start not making it)”
      external (and this is the most offensive): “why don’t you want to talk to me, I already do that. See what you’re ready for - well, talk to me!” - but it’s a shame that it is said in plain text.
      1. yuriyselivanov
        4 March 2018 12: 20
        0
        Why so long! It can be shorter: "Ahhhh! Guard! Everything is gone !!!"
    3. yuriyselivanov
      4 March 2018 12: 24
      0
      When I served in the army, such peremptory aplomb as you had, the ensigns — the chiefs of the canteen and staff office with full primary education — usually differed.
      1. alex86
        alex86 4 March 2018 15: 21
        +3
        You already decide: or
        Quote: yuriyselivanov
        Why so long
        , or
        Quote: yuriyselivanov
        such peremptory aplomb

        At the same time, both will fail.
        It is long written in the article, in short it is possible like this: pp. 1-6 - you are driven around your ears, and people are hailing.
        PS: I just didn’t understand where I said that everything was lost - except for the money ...
  38. New Year day
    New Year day 3 March 2018 13: 35
    +11
    Quote: curvimeter
    Everything is for the people. For the Russian, “Fatherland is in danger!”, For the American, “Russians are coming!” A "hand washes his hand slowly" cut the loot supranational gangs, arranging shows for each of its electorate

    Everything is old
  39. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 14: 34
    +2
    Quote: Mestny
    We will now pass on your wish to the Ministry of Defense. Stay in touch.
    But the American “partners” as it were had enough cartoons - they do not howl about “universal truth”.

    And they are very gullible, and love cartoons, and computer graphics! wassat
  40. gladcu2
    gladcu2 3 March 2018 14: 42
    +4
    The biggest problem for the US in Russia is not the weapon that Russia has. Russia's arms are nonsense. Not because it is effective, but because the United States is an aggressor and, by reducing aggressiveness, they may not be afraid of using these weapons. In other words, the United States does not lose control of the situation.

    But! The method that the United States relied on to control Russia absolutely and completely does not justify itself. This method is the money of the oligarchs.

    The economic system created in Russia was supposed to stop the military potential of Russia. This did not happen. This is a shock. Because the answer why the system did not work is not found. And there is no answer how and what works now in Russia.

    We will see what happens next ..
  41. Radikal
    Radikal 3 March 2018 14: 44
    +1
    Quote: turbris
    Quote: dgonni
    But how is Ihtam not with the green men?

    Check once again which units were part of the Black Sea Fleet in Crimea before the Maidan, you will find a brigade of marines - these were also green men, but they were there from the beginning, so everything is right, nobody lied to you.

    Your surname is not accidentally Elena Vasilyeva, it was she, having come to work at the Ministry of Defense that coined the term “green men” that was offensive to our military personnel. sad
  42. Vladivostok1969
    Vladivostok1969 3 March 2018 14: 50
    +2
    Quote: Vladimir16
    The operation of a nuclear power plant does not lead to infection.
    Test technology will not tell us. I think this process is secret.
    They could make the work of the NPP safe. So here they were able to solve this problem.

    Of course, the operation of the nuclear power plant does not lead to infection, only the spent nuclear fuel is then removed and put into reprocessing. And before that it was stored in special storage facilities. And you say.
  43. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  44. Gennady Epeykin
    Gennady Epeykin 3 March 2018 15: 21
    +3
    And what will happen to Chubais Seluanov Nabiullina, and so on, whom the State Department has set to harm Russia. Trump will probably fire them.
    1. ans
      ans 4 March 2018 22: 06
      0
      Quote: Gennady Epeykin
      And what will happen to Chubais Seluanov Nabiullina, and so on, whom the State Department has set to harm Russia. Trump will probably fire them.

      Well of course Trump! After all, the fish is rotting from the head! laughing
  45. udincev
    udincev 3 March 2018 16: 07
    0
    Quote: Orionvit
    Anyway, I am inclined to think that this is mostly from the realm of fantasy.

    Real fiction is a cell phone and the Internet.
  46. turbris
    turbris 3 March 2018 16: 43
    +3
    Quote: Silvestr
    Quote: turbris
    but they were there from the beginning, so everything is correct, no one deceived you.

    agree, one brigade to cover all the HF APU in the Crimea was not enough. The obvious things cannot be denied, even if you don't like it.

    they didn’t carry air
    You can easily find videos of the transfer of troops through the Kerch crossing. The number of APUs in Crimea at that time was about 27 thousand people. How many in a separate brigade of personnel?

    But Putin admitted that the transfer of special forces was carried out, in addition to the existing green people, but he admitted it when it was possible to do so. And before this it was not necessary to do this for tactical and political reasons, so it was not a lie, but the observance of military secrets, which was advisable at that time, was it so hard to understand?
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. cedar
    cedar 3 March 2018 17: 35
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Putin, of course, did not state everything in his statement .. The weapon is a good and necessary thing!
    But I think the West is digging a hole “financial” and they are very violently reacting to this, in every possible way sanctioning and humiliating Russia and Putin! It’s not yet evening gentlemen .. hi
    Oh, you have to pay a lot for the gentlemen and your "mongrel" including ..


    The task is to convincingly, but politely ask the United States to overthrow Russia, taking with it its puppets and, as a result, redirect the hundreds of billions of greenery that the naughty Saxons are now pumping out of Russia to ... See Putin’s speech, it says what our money will go to.
    A polite word is convincing, but reinforced by “Dagger”, “Sarmat” and “Vanguard”, convincingly triple ...
    Sovereignty. Russia. Putin
    1. ans
      ans 4 March 2018 22: 10
      +2
      [quote = cedar] Watch Putin’s speech, it says what our money will finally go to.
      Lies! You won’t get this money if you are not Putin’s personal friend
  49. Maxim Maksimych Stirlitz
    Maxim Maksimych Stirlitz 3 March 2018 18: 53
    +1
    everything is good that against the USA .... ata
  50. alex86
    alex86 3 March 2018 19: 14
    +4
    according to claim 1: a mixture of truth and bluff - Sarmat - certainly Vanguard - some work is underway, a dagger - probably there is, but the range is clearly overestimated, a rocket with a nuclear reactor - given out as desired, work is underway, but the result is not achieved, underwater drone - probably there is a certain prototype, but it’s not ready for actual operation
    according to claim 2: that which works cannot be shown (except for Sarmat, since there you can show anything), that which does not work - there is nothing to show
    according to claim 3: the goal, of course, is the United States, only at the State Department press conference for some reason did our correspondents try to deny this
    according to claim 4: everyone understood - one more Kim, version 2.0, you can wait for everything, with the adequacy of the problem
    according to claim 5: thanks to such speeches, NATO was becoming impaired and gaining momentum to mobilize and strengthen. Military budgets will be built up, and due to the small size of the Russian economy compared with most leading economies and the low efficiency of this economy, we will once again be brought to "guns instead of oil" and brought to the state of the USSR before the year 91, and then, God forbid. ..
    according to claim 6: he did not succeed in anything special, work on the defense industry was carried out, is ongoing and will continue, taking into account clause 1 - that is, that is, that is not there.
    The whole speech has two audiences: the internal one - “look how good I am, protecting you from the external enemy I have invented, believe me, and you will live as it happens (you didn’t live richly, you’ll start not making it)”
    external (and this is the most offensive): “why don’t you want to talk to me, I already do that. See what you’re ready for - well, talk to me!” - but it’s a shame that it is said in plain text.